TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Families have approached me with concerns about their loved ones being moved from hospitals to care homes during the pandemic. Many elderly patients were not properly cared for and were not given their necessary medications, leading to their deterioration. The NG 163 protocol, similar to the Liverpool pathway, was reinstated, which involved the use of respiratory suppressants like midazolam and morphine. It is questionable why these medications were given to COVID-19 patients, as it worsens their respiratory condition. Many believe that their relatives were put on this pathway unnecessarily, hastening their end. I have received evidence on this matter and anticipate potential court cases.

Around 6,000 additional deaths have been estimated due to administering two doses of Rivotril to elderly individuals in order to facilitate their death. These deaths occurred in nursing homes over a certain period of time. It was decided, without prior statistics, that these individuals had incurable conditions and would not recover, so they were assisted towards death. In the Paris region, rapid intervention measures were implemented to administer Rivotril to elderly individuals suspected of suffering from Covid-19. This decision resulted in a significant increase in mortality, particularly among the elderly in nursing homes. This decision-making process is considered a scandal.

Grace's death certificate listed COVID-19 pneumonia as the cause of death, but her family believes she was actually murdered. The hospital increased her medication dosage significantly, refused to resuscitate her, and put a do not resuscitate order in place. Despite pleas from her family, nurses did not intervene, claiming Grace was a do not resuscitate patient. The family suspects foul play due to the sequence of events leading to Grace's death.

A good death requires equipment, medication, and administration. The NHS has enough syringe drivers to keep patients comfortable during their final moments. However, there are accusations of negligence and harm caused by the use of certain drugs. The combination of midazolam and morphine has been deemed dangerous and has led to the deaths of multiple individuals. The use of diuretics to dehydrate patients has also worsened their condition. This scandalous situation is known as the paradoxical effect, where the very treatment meant to help actually harms. The consequences have been devastating, with waves of deaths occurring due to this cycle.

Speaker 0 recalls a case: “patient, he was sick. He looked like he was dying, but they just, like, pushed morphine. He had no pain. You know, they do a pain score, so zero to 10. This guy had zero pain.” Then, “they pushed insulin to drop his sugar, and his glucose was fine. And then he died three minutes later.” He says he “turned him into medical board. I reviewed this chart and turned him into medical board. Nothing.” “But, yeah, they definitely that definitely went on during COVID.” Speaker 1: “Jesus. That is such a terrifying thought that someone would just decide so many people are dying. This guy's definitely gonna die. Yep. This is 100% real?” Speaker 0: “Yeah. Definite. Definite.” Speaker 1: “It's It seems like something” Speaker 0: “they would call it tell euthanasia. They don't call it euthanasia.” Speaker 1: “It seems like something I would tell me, and then I would have to ask you. Like, this is something someone told me. I'm sure this” Speaker 0: “is send you the record that I read to you.” Speaker 1: “It seems like something I would be bringing up to you as a ridiculous thing, and you'd shoot it down.”

Many nurses witnessed patients dying not from COVID, but from medical mismanagement like using remdesivir and ventilators. One nurse highlighted the lack of feeding tubes for ventilator patients. Placing patients on ventilators without feeding tubes led to starvation and death. The focus on ventilators instead of proper care caused harm, with many patients not surviving the treatment. Early intubation was pushed to contain the virus, resulting in high mortality rates for ventilated patients. The situation in hospitals was distressing and poorly managed.

Many people have approached me with concerns about their relatives being moved from hospitals to care homes during the pandemic. It seems that these elderly individuals were not properly cared for and were often not given their necessary medications. This led to their health deteriorating, with limited access to doctors. Additionally, a protocol called MG 163 was authorized, which reinstated the Liverpool pathway and the use of respiratory suppressants like midazolam and morphine. This medication combination worsens respiratory issues, and many believe it was unnecessarily given to their loved ones, hastening their end. I have received a lot of evidence on this matter, and it is likely that there will be court cases about it.

Patients are dying not from COVID, but from treatments like remdesivir causing organ failure. One person's mother died after being given remdesivir against their wishes, leading to organ shutdown. There was a financial incentive for hospitals to admit patients and put them on ventilators, resulting in unnecessary treatments and deaths.

During the pandemic, fear and politics took over, leading to social distancing and mask mandates. The predictions of physicist Niall Ferguson and Imperial College London were highly exaggerated and flawed. Elderly individuals were hit the hardest, with many dying in care homes due to the use of the sedative midazolam. The government implemented policies to protect the NHS, but it was actually a cover for a euthanasia program. Face masks were ineffective against the virus, as admitted by experts like Dr. Fauci. The pandemic was a behavioral experiment to manipulate and control people's behavior.

In hospitals, a drug called midazolam, previously used for euthanasia and lethal injections, is now being used to induce a comatose state in patients. Shockingly, it has also been administered to elderly individuals in UK care centers, with their deaths being attributed to COVID-19. It is important to note that midazolam is known to be lethal. This information has been observed in medical reports.

Governments worldwide intentionally suppressed early treatment for COVID-19, causing fear, suffering, hospitalization, and death. This controversial narrative aimed to harm citizens simultaneously. Disturbingly, doctors in the Netherlands admitted to euthanizing seniors with lethal doses of morphine instead of treating the virus. Similar occurrences were reported in Africa and South America. The bizarre behavior observed globally during the pandemic was not limited to the United States.

Speaker 0: The problem they have, like I say, or had, is that they weren't getting enough deaths to really find the population. So they needed a lot of people to die very quickly in the 2020. So what they did in Britain, they did it in other countries too, but I can talk about the British example, is we had a health secretary at the time called Matt Hancock, and he oversaw the ordering, not least two years supply from France, of an end of life drug called midazolam, which is used in by a number of American states in the execution process. It's a sedative, and if you give too much of it, you kill people, and I've seen documented evidence. We've done a documentary about it on Iconic. I've seen documented evidence given to me that shows that the levels of midazolam that were given to people were lethal and would have been known to be lethal. And another effect of midazolam, ironically, is that it suppresses respiration and respiratory, the respiratory process. So if you take midazolam, you start to have breathing problems. And the more midazolam they give you, the more breathing problems you have until it kills you. And these connection to the breathing problems and the suppression of respiration is actually in the regulations of midazolam use. It's all there to be seen. So in Britain, you had this massive, massive delivery of midazolam in the 2020, and they used midazolam in the preparation for operations, but they stopped operations except the most emergency. So all that midazolam that would have been used in operations was now not being used in operations. Suddenly, in the same period, April 2020, the midazolam use went through the fricking roof way beyond anything that's been used before. And this is what they've done, and they did it in America, and they did it in other countries. They said to the hospitals in Britain, this is through Hancock and those that control him, it's the porn, a psychopathic porn, yes, but a porn. We've got to clear the beds for this big influx of COVID people that's coming in this pandemic, which never actually came. That's why you saw all these nurses on TikTok doing their dancing in empty hospitals, nobody bloody there. So we've got to get clear the beds. So what the hospitals did, they did this in America. Mhmm. The same thing happened there with another drug, and they they they put them into the care homes. And if you're in a hospital and you're elderly, your health is in serious trouble. But they put these very seriously ill people into care homes, and they fed them midazolam. At the same time they fed them midazolam, they were putting do not resuscitate orders on them, not only on the elderly, but on people with learning difficulties, people with psychological problems, just like the Nazis. And these people were dying in droves. What will happen is thousands and thousands and thousands of old people in Britain died in this very same period from midazolam. And they said they died of COVID nineteen because it was their respiratory thing that did that did for them. Right? Well, that was caused by the midazolam, you psychopath. And what did they call that? Thousands of people dying. The first wave of COVID, because they didn't have a virus, so they had to make it seem as if they did. In America, they used a drug called Remdesivir that was mandated for use on so called COVID patients. They tested positive with a test not tested with the virus by the psychopath, Antti DiFauci. And what remdesivir does is it stops the kidneys function, stops other organs function, but it stops the kidneys function, it's infamous for it. And so what happens is the abdominal cavity started filling up with water of people, and their lungs filled up with water, and they literally drowned. And they called this the first wave of COVID in America. This is how it was done.

The Liverpool Care Pathway (LCP) was introduced in the 1990s to provide end-of-life care in hospitals. While it aimed to improve comfort and dignity, there were controversies surrounding its implementation. Families reported treatments being removed too quickly and patients being put on the LCP without consent. In 2013, the LCP was scrapped in England, Scotland, and Northern Ireland, but concerns remain that similar practices continue under different names. There are allegations that the sedative midazolam, which suppresses the respiratory system, is being used inappropriately on COVID-19 patients, potentially leading to premature deaths. Whistleblowers have raised concerns about the lack of consultation and the normalization of euthanasia in care homes.

A patient who looked like he was dying was given morphine despite having zero pain, according to the pain score. Insulin was also administered even though his glucose was fine, and he died three minutes later. The speaker reported this case to the medical board after reviewing the chart, but they did nothing. The speaker states that this definitely went on during COVID. The speaker refers to this as euthanasia, though it is not called that. The speaker offered to send the record that was reviewed.

Updating anticipatory care plans during the pandemic was challenging due to families wanting hospital treatment for their loved ones, but facing restrictions. There was a push by the NHS to implement DNA CPR in care homes, causing access to care to be limited without much public discussion. Translation: During the pandemic, updating care plans and implementing DNA CPR in care homes faced challenges and restrictions, impacting access to care without widespread public awareness.

The speaker shares a disturbing experience where patients died and their bodies were stacked in freezer trucks, but not from COVID. Autopsies were banned and there were price hikes for ventilators and deaths. Feeling unable to speak up, the speaker decided to go undercover and recorded conversations for four weeks. They play a clip of a doctor who didn't properly care for a patient, wrote her death certificate before she died, and lied to her family. The speaker believes it's important for the public to know about these unethical practices. They question why the hospital staff didn't act differently if family or ethics committees were present. The speaker asks for opinions on what the right thing to do in that situation would be.

Many nurses witnessed patients dying not from COVID, but from medical mismanagement like using remdesivir and ventilators. One nurse highlighted the lack of feeding tubes alongside ventilators, emphasizing the importance of proper care. Patients were intubated early, leading to high mortality rates. The medical system's focus on COVID treatments caused harm, with nurses bearing the brunt of patient care.

A senior British coroner has confirmed a full medical inquest into a death involving the end-of-life care protocol, midazolam, plus an opioid. The inquest is set for next month, and will span five days. Evidence will be presented regarding allegations of a systemic policy by the British state using NHS protocol NG163 to implement involuntary state euthanasia, targeting the elderly in care facilities under the guise of COVID. It's alleged that the excess death rates in April 2020 were due to the state using midazolam injections for involuntary euthanasia, using COVID as a cover. This allegation, brought forth by over 50 victim families, will finally be heard, and a senior coroner will consider the evidence. Radical Media has been accepted as an official independent media monitor for this hearing.

A nurse and a doctor discuss the use of ventilators in hospitals during the pandemic. The nurse reveals that some floors were carrying out actions that other floors refused to do, essentially causing harm to patients. The doctor mentions that ventilators were used to protect healthcare workers, even though they had a high fatality rate for patients. The lack of transparency with patients and families is highlighted, as well as the reluctance to explore alternative treatments like Ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine. The speaker also mentions the incentivization of using certain drugs and protocols that led to unnecessary deaths.

The speaker received a call from a care home stating her father had fallen and was agitated, and would be given morphine. She was shocked he was on an end-of-life path of injecting to stop his issues. She later learned midazolam, one of the medications being used, is considered by some practitioners to be like being waterboarded because it floods the lungs. The speaker was not advised about a specific end-of-life care plan for her father. She expressed concerns to the care home manager about what she had seen and the way end-of-life care was being administered. Despite a DNR in place from the first care home, she learned her father had been mobile and trying to get to the toilet. She felt it was a random decision to keep him quiet, in isolation, in a comatose state.

The speaker's brother, James, died in Ninewells Hospital in May 2021 at age 41. She describes him as a healthy, kind chef. After being taken to the hospital, she believed he was in the best place. However, she later learned from his medical records that doctors tried to put him on a ventilator, which angered her because this wasn't communicated to her. She communicated with her brother via text for the first few days, but then he was given lorazepam and ventilated. The family didn't want him on a ventilator due to low chances of recovery. He developed ventilator-associated pneumonia, which she discovered later in his records. The death certificate cited SARS COVID-2 as the cause of death. She noted a discrepancy in the time of death, raising questions about resuscitation. She requested investigations into his death, focusing on his participation in a trial where the signature on the consent form didn't appear to be his. She questioned whether trial drugs caused an allergic reaction. She also discovered he was prescribed toxomolobab, an immune suppression drug, making him more susceptible to hospital-acquired infections. She claims doctors and nurses lied to her daily.

According to the speaker, hospital protocols differed for vaccinated and unvaccinated COVID-19 patients, with more aggressive protocols used on the unvaccinated. The unvaccinated patients interviewed were often given remdesivir, a repurposed drug from a failed Ebola trial where about half the patients died. The speaker claims the efficacy data for remdesivir was "sketchy at best," but hospitals received large reimbursements for its use. The speaker alleges that patients would then be put on oxygen, then mechanical ventilation, then ICU, and finally, if they resisted, a cocktail of sedatives and sometimes four-point restraints to prevent them from leaving. The speaker states that "a lot of the patients died." The speaker claims that at each step, the hospital received more reimbursement, and there was "lockstep adherence" to the protocol.

The speakers discuss a concerning situation in a hospital where patients are being given unnecessary medications to hasten their death. One nurse shares her experience of witnessing this practice and how it made her more vigilant about patient safety. The conversation also touches on the denial of certain treatments and the financial incentives for hospitals to label patients as COVID cases and potentially profit from their deaths. The speakers raise questions about the coordination and ethics behind these practices.

The speaker received a phone call saying their dad was feeling unwell. They were told that their dad was agitated and had been shouting for help. They found him on his hands and knees trying to get to the toilet. The care home said they would introduce end-of-life medication, which shocked the speaker. They were allowed to visit their dad, but only at the door while wearing full PPE. They were not sure if their dad was COVID negative or if the restriction was to limit staff exposure. They were only able to see their dad lying on his side in bed.

The inquiry anticipates hearing that people were pressured into DNR notices, were not resuscitated without a notice, and may have been neglected and left to starve. Families may not have been told the truth about the cause of death, and the usual death certification process was altered. A solicitor produced a DNR order with a name printed in block letters, not a normal signature. A witness stated they told the care home categorically that they did not want a DNR order in place for their grandmother. A care home manager said there was a push from the NHS to implement more DNRs. One home received DNR/ACPR forms for all residents who didn't have one. Challenges arose when families wanted their loved ones to receive hospital treatment for non-COVID ailments, but facilities wouldn't accept them. It was stated that GPs were said to have discussed DNR forms with families, but this didn't seem to be the case. The process was rushed, with a focus on who needed a DNR because they wouldn't be able to go to the hospital. There was no individual consideration, and care homes weren't asked about a resident's health when considering DNRs. Access to ambulances and hospitals was limited, leading to DNR decisions.