reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0 notes the world population is 6.8 billion and is headed up to about 9 billion. He says if we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, and reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15%. Speaker 1 responds with the question: common sense would tell you that if a man standing in front of you says he's gonna reduce the world's population by 10–15% using vaccines, what does that mean to you? He explains that means somebody's going to die because you put a vaccine in them, and it doesn't mean you're going to save people. He says that’s common sense, but he saw him say it, and now he’s here; he says, "I’m now an anti vaxxer I wasn't before."

The speaker claims that when the rotavirus vaccine was approved, four out of five board members had direct financial interests in it, working for the companies that made the vaccine or receiving grants to do clinical trials on it. One board member, Paul Offit, allegedly voted to add the rotavirus vaccine to the schedule while he had a rotavirus vaccine in development. The speaker says that because it's now on the schedule, his developing vaccine is virtually guaranteed to get on the schedule. The rotavirus vaccine that Offit voted on was withdrawn within a year because it was causing intussusception in kids. Offit's vaccine then replaced it. The speaker states that Offit and his business partners sold that vaccine to Merck for $186,000,000. The speaker says that Offit told Newsweek that he won the lottery and that it's been said of him that he voted himself rich.

In 1989, 10 shots were given as part of the vaccine schedule. Compared to other Western countries, we give twice as many shots. The question is, do we really need all these vaccines? We should educate ourselves and make informed decisions as parents. We can't assume that those in charge of public health always have our best interests at heart. Some doctors seem hesitant to learn more about vaccines, which can save lives and prevent diseases. It's important to note that the pharmaceutical industry heavily influences medical schools and the American Academy of Pediatrics. Vaccines are a booming business, worth billions of dollars. We need doctors to prioritize prevention and overall health, even if it means taking a financial hit.

Speaker 0 argues that ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine were suppressed because they are well-established drugs with safety records and billions of doses used; ivermectin is a human drug that also works on horses and won the Nobel Prize for its effectiveness in humans. He states there is a federal law that says an emergency use authorization (EUA) for a vaccine cannot be granted if there is any approved medication shown effective against the target disease, so admitting effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin would have made EUA for vaccines illegal and would have collapsed a “200,000,000,000 enterprise.” Speaker 1 notes this is the first time hearing that assertion, acknowledging it’s in the book. He suggests that if the medical community had been saying ivermectin is an effective COVID treatment, EUA for vaccines could not have been granted. Speaker 0 explains that many in the medical community supported effectiveness, citing a petition signed by 17,000 doctors and numerous peer-reviewed publications, but Fauci aggressively crusaded against it, labeling it a horse medication and alleging danger and overdosing to drown out those reports. Speaker 1 asks why Fauci continued to push the claim after EUA was granted. Speaker 0 answers that, even with EUA, the law may require withdrawal if a functioning medication exists, implying a motive to undermine ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine. He mentions a strong incentive for Fauci to kill these medications and cites several doctors who treated tens of thousands of COVID patients and supported the claim that the science shows many lives could have been saved. He names Harvey Reich at Yale, Peter McCulloch as the most published doctor in history and prominent in biostatistics/epidemiology, and Peter Quarry in connection with the doctors who treated many patients. They allegedly state that half a million Americans did not need to die.

you were promoted to the FDA classifies the vaccine as a drug. You were told it was safe. You were told it was effective. Mister Fauci, you made the statement that none of these shots will prevent transmission. You also stated that none of these shots will prevent you from getting the virus. So you're telling the people to take a shot that will will not prevent you from getting the virus and that will not prevent you from transmitting the virus if you do get it. The ultimate agenda is two things. One profit, which we all know is the pharmaceutical companies and agencies middle name. The word pharmaceutical comes from the Greek word pharmakia, which is in the bible. Pharmakia means sorcery and or witchcraft. You are now and have been experimented on. The Johnson and Johnson shot has aborted fetal tissue from aborted babies from the retina, as well as the kidney cells. Johnson and Johnson, you playing too much. You had over twenty five thousand cases of cancer racking up to over $4,000,000,000 of lawsuits. Why should we trust Moderna, the youngest one in the group? Ain't never created no vaccine, and this is not even a vaccine. We are getting banged on by institutions at high levels. We ain't got nothing on them.

The discussion questions whether SIDS is “vaccine death,” asserting that 75% of all SIDS deaths occurred within seven days of a vaccination. It references a “Polio, forty eight hour safety review trial,” described as “forty eight hours, two days,” and connects this to President Roosevelt, described as famous for having polio in a wheelchair. The speaker claims Roosevelt “had transverse myelitis” and then answers a challenge: “No way. Didn’t have polio,” adding “How can you sit here and say doctors don’t know anything about vaccines?” The response continues by arguing that doctors do not have adequate education about vaccines, stating that “a doctor is lucky if they have a half a day education on vaccines.” The speaker further says, “I have yet to find a pediatrician that can list the ingredients of any vaccines.” The argument then escalates into the claim that “They don’t know anything at all,” emphasizing certainty about doctors’ knowledge of vaccines. The speaker claims “99.5 of our children are getting a product that was tested for five days,” and states that this product is tested “for a disease they will not come in contact with until they’re an adult.” The speaker adds that, “hopefully never,” children will face situations the speaker associates with infection risk, describing those situations as “sharing heroin needles or sleeping with prostitutes.” The overall message frames the topic as revealing wrongdoing, saying, “I do believe when people see the truth on this, it will reveal everything that’s corrupt about the world that you live in.”

Speaker 0 claimed that none of the 72 vaccines mandated for children has ever been safety tested in relicensing placebo-controlled trials. He said Fauci has been denying this for eight years and recounted a 2016 appointment by President Trump to run a vaccine safety commission, where he asked Fauci and Collins to meet with him with White House counsel. He stated that at that meeting Fauci said, “you say I’m lying,” and promised to send the study, but he never received it. He asserted that he sued Fauci and Aaron Siri, and after a year of stonewalling, government lawyers admitted on the courthouse steps that they never had any study, and provided a written acknowledgment. He pointed to a CHC website and his own website where the letter from HHS is posted. He claimed there is “no downstream liability” and “no front end safety testing,” which he said saves vaccine makers a quarter of a billion dollars. He further argued there is no marketing and advertising cost because the federal government orders 78,000,000 school kids to take that vaccine every year. He described a “gold rush” to add vaccines to the schedule, which he argued is unnecessary for most of them, and claimed many vaccines target diseases that are not even casually contagious. He contended that once a vaccine is on the recommended schedule, it becomes a billion-dollar-a-year business for the company. He asserted that NIH bears royalties in many cases. According to him, a set of vaccines expanded to 72 shots and 16 vaccines contributed to a dramatic increase in vaccine offerings. He linked this expansion to a broader push around vaccines, including the HPV vaccine. He also claimed that in 1989 there was an explosion of chronic disease in American children, including neurological diseases, ADD, ADHD, sleep disorders, language delays, ASD (autism), Tourette syndrome, tics, and narcolepsy. He stated that autism prevalence rose from one in ten thousand generations ago to one in thirty-four children today, citing CDC data. Overall, the summary repeats assertions about the lack of placebo-controlled safety testing, the admission of no study, financial and regulatory incentives to expand vaccine schedules, and a sharp rise in diagnosed neurological and developmental conditions beginning around 1989.

I'm looking at a world population of 6.8 billion, projected to hit 9 billion. If we focus on new vaccines, healthcare, and reproductive health services, we might be able to lower that by 10 to 15 percent. If someone says they're going to reduce the world's population by 10 to 15 percent using vaccines, it suggests that some people will die because of those vaccines. This doesn't sound like saving people. I never considered myself anti-vax, but here we are.

The speakers discuss the increased number of vaccines since 1990 and question if all are necessary. One speaker claims the US vaccine schedule includes twice as many shots as other Western countries. They suggest parents should educate themselves, space out or delay vaccines, and clean out toxins. One speaker believes public health officials may not always have people's best interests at heart. They claim the AAP and medical schools are financed by drug companies and that vaccines are the pharmaceutical industry's largest growing division, worth $13 billion. They suggest asking pharmaceutical companies to take a loss for the good of children is a tough sell.

"Birtucil is probably the single worst mass vaccine that we've ever seen." "This vaccine targets millions of preteens and teens for whom the risk of dying from cervical cancer is zero." "Death rates in the Gardasil trials were thirty seven times the death rates for cervical cancer." "Children who take that vaccine, the Gardasil vaccine, are thirty seven times more likely to die from the vaccine than they are to die from cervical cancer." "So the problem with Gardasil, like most vaccines, is it was never tested against a true placebo, an inert placebo." "And the CDC and HHS say, if you don't test it against a true placebo, it's not science." "The entity that is actually performing the study is and paying for this study is Merck." "Merck got to decide which injuries were being caused by Gardasil and which were just bad coincidences." "They were able to license something that is insanely dangerous."

Speaker 0: The population today is 6,800,000,000 people, and it’s headed up to about 9,000,000,000. If we do a really great job on new vaccines, health care, reproductive health services, we could lower that by perhaps 10 or 15%. Speaker 1: Well, common sense would tell you if you have a man standing in front of you saying he's gonna reduce the world's population by 10 or 15% using vaccines, what does that mean to you? That means somebody's going to die because you put a vaccine in them. It doesn't mean you're going to save people. That's pretty much common sense in my brain but yet I saw him say it, he said it and here we are I don't know I'm just here we are I'm now an anti vaxxer I wasn't before.

There are over 1,400 peer-reviewed studies on NIH's website linking various vaccines to different health issues. The vaccine industry makes $60 billion a year from selling vaccines and $500 billion a year from selling remedies for vaccine injuries. This business plan involves making people sick and then selling them the lifetime cure. Unlike measles or chickenpox, which can be cured with chicken soup and vitamin A, vaccines can cause lifelong conditions like diabetes or ADHD, ensuring a permanent customer base. Some vaccines are given to babies for illnesses they have zero risk of getting, like hepatitis B. These unnecessary vaccines can be dangerous despite having no risk.

The speaker argues that unvaccinated populations “won’t do it” and offers an example involving the DTP vaccine (diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis). They state that the vaccine was removed from use in “this country” because it was causing injuries, including “severe brain injuries, or death to one in every three hundred children,” and that in the 1980s its use led to litigation against vaccine companies, which precipitated the passage of the Vaccine Act that gave them immunity from liability. The speaker then contrasts countries, saying the DTP vaccine is banned or not used in “Europe” and the “America,” but is given to “one hundred and sixty one million African children a year.” They claim that Bill Gates asked the Danish government to support the program, saying it saved “thirty million lives,” but that the Danish government asked for the data and “wasn’t able to” receive it. The Danish government then conducted its own studies by going to Africa and reviewing “thirty years of DTP data.” According to the speaker, the Danish government’s studies found that girls who received DTP were dying at “10 times the rate” of unvaccinated girls, and that the causes of death were not ones associated with diphtheria, tetanus, or pertussis. The speaker lists deaths attributed to diphtheria, anemia, malaria, bilharzia, pulmonary disease, respiratory disease, pneumonia, and other “minor diseases.” The speaker concludes that for “thirty years” no one noticed that the vaccinated girls—not unvaccinated girls—were dying, and they claim DTP protected girls against diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis while “also ruined their immune systems,” leaving them “unable to defend themselves against other” illnesses that other children with “hearty immune systems” could fend off.

Nick, what does the Maha crew need to do and what do the people need to be demanding? First, we have to look in the past. Back in the nineteen fifties, they removed the Qatar polio vaccine for ten deaths. They removed the swine flu vaccine of nineteen seventies for twenty to fifty deaths. They removed the Rhoda Shield vaccine in 1999 due to ten cases of bowel obstruction. So regardless, it doesn't even matter. These vaccines have far surpassed the threshold for withdrawal of a product. There's just no argument. The data is there. There is no reason to deny it. People need to act accordingly with the data.

In the early 1980s in the United States, there were only three routine vaccines: DTP, MMR, and OPV, totaling seven injections for childhood, plus the adult and pregnancy schedules, which did not exist at the time. Manufacturers of these three products either stopped making them or went out of business due to injuries and the financial liability associated with those injuries. Typically, when a product harms people, a company would respond by making a better, safer version. The speaker notes that, for vaccines, Congress chose a different path. Instead of compelling manufacturers to improve safety or compensate victims, the United States Congress decided to provide immunity from liability. In 1986, Congress passed the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act, which granted immunity to manufacturers for liability not only for those three early vaccines but for virtually all other vaccines made thereafter, including all childhood vaccines. The speaker emphasizes the contrast between the standard industry response to harm (improve the product) and the legislative approach taken with vaccines (immunity from liability). The implication highlighted is that this immunity allowed vaccine manufacturers to continue selling products despite injuries, shaping the broader vaccine landscape beyond the initial three vaccines.

Speaker 0 explains that people wonder why ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine were suppressed, noting these are well established drugs with safety profiles and billions of doses given. He says ivermectin is a human drug and also works on horses, but it would win the Nobel Prize because it works so well on human beings. Speaker 1 responds “Mhmm.” Speaker 0 states there is a little known federal law that says you cannot give an emergency use authorization (EUA) to a vaccine if there is any medication approved for any purpose that is shown effective against the target disease. So if Tony Fauci or anybody had admitted that hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin are effective against COVID, it would have been illegal to give the EUAs to the vaccines, and they could never have gotten them approved. He suggests this would have collapsed a “200,000,000,000 enterprise.” Speaker 1 says, “That is fascinating,” noting they had been covering this for two years and that this is the first time hearing that; if the medical community had been saying ivermectin works, it would have affected EUA. Speaker 0 responds that the medical community did say that—17,000 doctors signed a petition, and there are many peer reviewed publications consistently saying so. Yet Fauci aggressively crusaded against it, insisting it’s a horse medication, that people are overdosing, and so on. He asks why Fauci kept saying it. Speaker 1 asks why Fauci continued to say it after he got the authorization. Speaker 0 offers possible explanations: one, even if you have an EUA, the law appears to say you can't have it anymore if there is a functioning medication. He acknowledges, though, that he cannot read Fauci’s mind but speculates there is a strong incentive for Fauci to kill ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine. He cites several doctors who treated tens of thousands of COVID patients successfully and who argue that half a million Americans did not need to die, naming Harvey Reich at Yale, Peter McCulloch, and Peter Quarry.

We're injecting genetically modified organisms into kids' arms. My business strategies were questioned during the Microsoft antitrust trial. To counter the negative press, I invested in the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, transforming my image. Vaccines are the best investment I've ever made, with over a 20 to 1 return. The Gates Foundation controls a vast supply chain, but it faces criticism for profiting from companies causing the very problems it aims to solve. Normalcy returns only with global vaccination. Until then, new vaccines and therapeutics are needed. Vaccine manufacturers have immunity. In India, the Gates Foundation incentivized mass vaccinations. An untested vaccine was given to tribal girls without proper consent, causing injuries and even deaths. The Indian Parliament investigated and initially kicked out the Gates Foundation. Studies show the oral polio vaccine caused paralysis in nearly 500,000 Indian children.

The speaker states they searched for years for a pre-licensing safety trial of the 72 vaccine doses effectively mandated for American children. They claim that every other medication requires a safety trial comparing health outcomes in a placebo group versus a vaccine group before FDA licensing. The speaker assumed this was also done for vaccines. They state they found out that vaccines were exempt from this requirement.

Vaccines are not subjected to true placebo-controlled trials before licensure. The DDP vaccine was pulled in the US due to lawsuits against drug companies. Wyeth, now Pfizer, requested full immunity from liability for all vaccines from the Reagan administration in 1986, threatening to leave the vaccine business. The company claimed they were losing $20 in downstream liability for every dollar of profit. When asked to make vaccines safe, they responded that "vaccines are unavoidably unsafe." This phrase is in the statute granting them immunity and was cited in the Brusowitz Supreme Court case. The industry obtained immunity by convincing the president and Congress that vaccines are unavoidably unsafe.

In 02/2015, Bill Gates stated the world population needs to be reduced by 10 to 15% due to global warming, and this would be achieved through vaccines. In 02/2020, Gates said 7 billion people must be vaccinated. The speaker then poses the question of why they should take a vaccine for their health that is financed and produced by someone who wants to decrease the world population.

The transcript contrasts “legend” about young Bill Gates building a computer empire in a garage with a portrayal of Gates as coming from wealth and privilege. It claims Bill Gates’ grandfather and great grandfather were banking moguls, and that his father, William Gates Sr., was a prominent Seattle-based lawyer and political lobbyist who taught Gates “the ins and outs of law and politics” and how to “manipulate those governing forces.” It states that Gates dropped out of college to start Microsoft and is credited with inventing the operating system that became Windows, but claims he “bought an existing operating system from Seattle Computer Products,” had it modified, and licensed it to IBM, while still taking credit. The transcript also claims that during Paul Allen’s cancer, Gates “seized the opportunity” by attempting to cheat Allen out of his share of Microsoft’s fortune, describing Allen’s “shocking and disheartening” experiences with plans to dilute his share “down to almost nothing.” In 1998, it says the U.S. Department of Justice sued Microsoft for antitrust violations and that Gates gave hours of videotape testimony. It includes allegations that the Justice Department charged Microsoft with “anti competitive and exclusionary practices” to maintain its monopoly in personal computer operating systems. The transcript claims Gates invested $100,000,000 to set up the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation to “overshadow the negative press,” leading to a rebranding that doubled his net worth and earned him “richest man in the world.” It quotes Gates announcing pledges of additional funds and states that a Wall Street essay described vaccines as “the best investment I’ve ever made,” including “over a 20 to one return.” It portrays the foundation as a vertically integrated multinational corporation controlling steps in a supply chain reaching from Seattle to villages in Africa and Asia, and raises allegations that the foundation’s investments and portfolio include companies blamed for social and health problems the foundation seeks to address, with accusations such as forcing people to lose homes, child labor, and neglect of patients. It then shifts to discussion of global vaccination efforts, including statements that “normalcy only returns when we’ve largely vaccinated the entire global population,” that going back to normal means putting lives at risk, and that the plan includes producing and deploying vaccines worldwide and fully vaccinating “children and pregnant women,” alongside new vaccines, therapeutics, and diagnostics. It claims syringes were already bought, and that military mobilization would enable rapid distribution. It also describes the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act signed by Ronald Reagan as granting “total immunity” to vaccine manufacturers, claims that after lawsuits vaccine makers went bankrupt, and that taxpayers pay damages when injuries or deaths result from adverse reactions. The transcript includes allegations involving India: it says an untested HPV vaccine was allegedly administered to thousands of tribal girls without proper study or paperwork, that girls were told they were receiving “wellness shots,” that some developed seizures and cancer and that seven died, and that a task force was created and the Gates Foundation was “kicked out.” It includes further references to alleged misinformation and to additional claims about polio vaccine-related paralysis in India, citing a 2018 scientific study claiming over 490,000 children developed paralysis. It states that without medical training, Bill and Melinda Gates founded the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization to vaccinate the world, and claims the foundation has been sued by governments of some of the poorest and most vulnerable nations for causing serious harm through experimental vaccine programs. It includes quotes and claims about African communities being used as “lab rats” and references the “Kissinger Report” as stating foreign policy in Africa aimed to reduce population to preserve resources for the U.S. The transcript lists additional alleged Gates-related initiatives, including a Stratospheric Controlled Perturbation Experiment described as blocking out the sun, an Earth Now global surveillance project described as launching hundreds of satellites to monitor people, a technology described as vaccinating under the skin with a “quantum dot tattoo” for digital “immunity proof,” and a plan to release millions of genetically modified mosquitoes funded by the Gates Foundation. It also includes a statement that “Science Magazine” coined the phrase “flying syringes.” It then shifts to claims about a connection between Bill Gates and Jeffrey Epstein, stating they met at least six times, that flight logs showed Gates was a passenger on the “Lolita Express,” and that Gates claimed he did not know the jet belonged to Epstein and denied business involvement. It adds that the New York Times revealed Gates initiated a relationship with Epstein after Epstein was convicted of sex crimes and that the two were involved in cofounding a multibillion-dollar charitable fund. The transcript ends with questions framed as whether Gates is a benevolent hero or a malevolent opportunist, and a closing statement expressing a personal desire to believe Gates is giving away his fortune and is unaware of “the damage he’s done.”

Speaker 0: It is a report that concludes that The United States official foreign policy signed into law in 1975 by president Ford, and when I say signed into law, it's called a presidential directive, is the reduction of population in 12 foreign twelve twelve specific foreign countries. Not the control of population, the reduction of population. And so it explains the ways we're gonna do this is through medicalizing birth control, never was before. You didn't need a doctor to get a condom, and to go around and talk to villages everywhere and say, you want a reproductive health freedom, don't you? You know what most women want on the planet Earth? Babies. They're they're not looking for reproductive health freedom was a term for have fewer babies. Right? There is a very potent move in official US foreign policy to reduce population in other countries. Now why? Philippines or or Indonesia. Why? They state it directly in the Kissinger report because it's classified. They wanted to reduce those countries' development so that they wouldn't need their own raw materials because we want them, the metals, etcetera. It is dark as shit, the Kissinger reports. It's not and it's not classified anymore. You can, you know, ask chat GPT about it to give you quotes from it. And so this whole business of population reduction is now another third rail I'm stepping on. Right? Nobody wants it. What are you you're nuts. No. A lot of people want it. A lot of people believe, obviously, Bill Gates, that 8,000,000,000 people was the number where we must turn it around, which is where we are supposedly now. And the Kissinger report, I was a kid. I didn't write it. I didn't make it up. You can find it on Wikipedia. It's a real thing. And all the presidential directives that came from it. Would these countries like the idea that we show up and we say, hey. We've got a new tetanus vaccine for you, but it happens to also have in it secretly something that will reduce fertility in your women as we did in India, as we did in Peru. In both India and Peru, we also did forced sterilization surgeries. US paid for them. True story. Speaker 1: So the the one vaccine was the DTP vaccine. Is that what it was? Speaker 0: The the one I'm talking about. The the Speaker 1: the The one that had h c g in it? It was just tetanus. But there was a vaccine that was in Bobby Kennedy's book Yeah. Where they were talking about women in Africa, where they were unknowingly given Yeah. This vaccine against That's that's diphtheria, tetanus, and Speaker 0: Well, it was the tetanus part Right. That that they were that they were pitching. And by the way, tetanus is a challenge in those countries more than it is in The United States. But, yeah, they were call they were naming them wellness drugs. Speaker 1: And they had h c g Speaker 0: in it. That's correct. Speaker 1: And that h c g, and they were more administered to women than they were to men. Speaker 0: Oh, of course. And they were five. They would administer administer five of the injections. Speaker 1: And they did it under this the guys were the the the narrative was that women were more vulnerable. So you have to give the vaccination to women. Yeah. And it was preventing them from getting pregnant. Speaker 0: It was preventing them from getting pregnant, and they had World Health Organization, which basically has this as a mission. Man, I wish they would sue me for saying this, but they they have this as a mission, which is population reduction from the beginning. They had worked on that HCG. Speaker 1: There's Gates famously, Speaker 0: of course, Speaker 1: in the speech saying Speaker 0: We can do that with vaccines. Speaker 0: Yeah. By the way, in the Kissinger report, for those of you not seeing this and only hearing it, that was me drinking my pause was me drinking water. I did not have a stroke. In the Kissinger report, they list the strategies and how much funding they'll give to each strategy. One of the strategies is to medicalize birth control, meaning have trusted people in the villages, etcetera. Another one is to pay young men to have a vasectomy. Just outright pay you know, write a check-in villages so they get $60 and they get a nice weekend of buying beer, but they never have kids. But another one of them is injections that reduce that temporarily reduce male fertility. Now here's an interesting thing about that one. It's in the Kissinger report. Injections that temporarily reduce male fertility. The COVID vaccine reduces sperm count in men for three months admitted by Fauci. It's not a secret. But the CDC's response was, yeah, but it's only for three months. And But they were asking us to take one every fucking three months. Well, also the miscarriages. Miscarriages and stillbirths. My point is that it's no it's no surprise that these persistent thoughts that I think good people believe meaning, I think there are good people who believe that population reduction is important. The fact is, of course, that now we are barely at replacement, you know, at replacement value right now in terms of many populations.

There are numerous peer-reviewed studies on NIH's website linking vaccines to various injuries. It seems that pharmaceutical companies are making $60 billion a year from vaccine sales and an additional $500 billion from selling remedies for vaccine-related injuries. This business plan involves making people sick and then selling them lifetime cures like diabetes medication, Adderall, Ritalin, Advair inhalers, albuterol inhalers, and anti-seizure medications. Unlike illnesses like measles or chickenpox that can be cured with chicken soup and vitamin A, vaccines can cause long-term conditions like diabetes or ADHD, ensuring a permanent customer base. Some vaccines are given to newborns for illnesses they have zero risk of contracting, such as hepatitis B, which can only be transmitted through unprotected sex or sharing needles. Despite the vaccine only lasting 5 years, it is still administered to infants, posing unnecessary risks.

What we need to do at our agency is to make sure the public believes in the things that we're saying. And the way that we do that is by telling the truth. There are many other countries that actually have a higher vaccination rates than ours where, there are no mandates, and it's because people trust their government. The Americans have lost faith in the federal government. Sixty percent of Americans say that they will not take that vaccine no matter what. And only thirteen percent of children although it's recommended for a hundred percent of children, only thirteen percent are complying. And that's after a billion dollar campaign to persuade people to take. It's the biggest campaign for a pharmaceutical product in history.

Speaker 0 says they found “information like this,” such as vaccine insert paper, with “nothing printed on it,” which they call disheartening and disgusting. They add that it “just keeps happening” and claim the CDC redacts “every single word” of a 148-page study on a myocarditis after COVID vaccination. Speaker 0 says they asked someone to print the study, and that the entire 148 pages are redacted. They ask what a study does if “there’s nothing there,” and they ask what might have been there that required redaction. Speaker 1 says they are “witnessing an active cover up” involving “a colossal consumer product safety debacle” affecting the entire world. They claim that in the United States, the CDC, National Institutes of Health, and FDA are actively involved in a cover up, and that similar cover ups are occurring in the UK with the MHRA, in Europe with European medicine agencies, and in Australia with the Therapeutic Goods Administration. Speaker 1 states that each company that puts out a product has an obligation to produce “ninety days of safety monitoring” after the product comes out, describing it as a regulatory dossier. They claim that if someone has a problem and reports it to a company like Pfizer, Pfizer must report, write down what happened, collate it into a report, and make it publicly available. Speaker 1 says that when the ninety days elapsed for Pfizer’s first vaccine approved on 12/10/2020, Pfizer “didn’t produce a report.” They add that people asked what was happening with the vaccine, and Pfizer allegedly would not disclose what happened, leading to a court case. Speaker 1 says the lawyer for the FDA stepped in to say they did not want to release Pfizer’s dossier for fifty-five years. Speaker 1 then says that after the plaintiff pushed, the Pfizer dossier “slowly” came out. They claim Pfizer recorded one thousand two hundred and twenty-three deaths with their product within ninety days of release, and they say people called Pfizer in desperation watching family members die after taking the vaccine. Speaker 1 also claims Pfizer recorded “over twelve hundred” new adverse events and refers to “doctor Boden” discussing problems they say they have been grappling with. They conclude by claiming the FDA worked to cover this up and should have been regulating the company with at least monthly meetings and full disclosure about novel vaccines, described by Speaker 1 as a genetic transfer technology platform and as the first time human beings were injected with foreign genetic material in world history, after which “they were getting it full on.” Speaker 1 ends by saying “Two thirds of the world’s population took”