reSee.it - Related Video Feed

So it's it's referred to in the literature as photobiomodulation photobiomodulation. If you want to look up any of the clinical studies, put photobiomodulation, and then put and dementia, and Alzheimer's, and skin, and inflammation, the studies will come up. But basically different nanometers of light have different effects in the body, and so they are well researched and publicized to reduce inflammation, increase microvascular circulation, so the smallest of the capillaries in our body are affected by light. They have a very specific effect in the mitochondria, the powerhouse of the cell. So if you actually went through the wall of a cell and into the cytoplasm and found the mitochondria and you went into the mitochondria, you'd see that there's a motor in there that's spinning around.

The pharmaceutical industry may face major concerns because it has become an alternative to palliative chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery in large clinical studies on cancer, with trial sizes ranging into the thousands and cancer cases in the high hundreds through photodynamic therapy. A randomized control trial published in *The Lancet Oncology* involved 413 people, with a “red light” group performing almost 400% better than the non-red light group. In that trial, only 6% of the red light group received surgery, while 3% of the non-red light group received surgery, described as a 100% difference. The transcript also highlights major post-surgical outcomes: after these surgeries, nine out of ten people will become impotent. Because of this, people are pursuing less invasive, more selective therapies that target tumor cells instead of “carpet bombing” the body or removing organs they want. The transcript describes a concern that organ removal is happening because people do not think there is a better option. It frames this as a “forced” or “transgender” surgery dynamic occurring when better alternatives are not available, and identifies this lack of options as the biggest threat.

Dr. Alexis Cohen (Jasmine Cohen) and the host discuss a wide-ranging view of health, science, and society, centered on mitochondria, light biology, and decentralized approaches to knowledge and healing. - On science, health, and authority: - Cohen argues that “we really haven’t been doing science for about seventy years now” and that modern science has become scientism, with people looking to scientists and doctors as authority figures over personal health, even though no one can fully know another’s lived body experience. - She emphasizes that aging is a reflection of mitochondrial heteroplasmy and that there are ways to slow or speed that burden, but contemporary living habits harm mitochondrial health. She asserts there are incentives to promote lifestyle advice that is not monetizable (outdoor activity, barefoot grounding, seasonal eating, movement), which she says slows research and access to information. - The conversation asserts a need to reclaim personal authority over health and to recognize life as magical and miraculous. - Personal entry into Bitcoin and crypto curiosity: - Cohen notes she and her partner became interested in Bitcoin in 2018, with a continued engagement including taking a cryptography course to understand the underlying proofs rather than accepting information at face value. - Background and work: - The host introduces Cohen as a Princeton-trained molecular biologist, a PhD focusing on metabolism, gut health, and circadian biology, who shifted from academic research to helping people rebuild health through nutrition, movement, mitochondrial function, and light exposure. Cohen shares that her own childhood illnesses, weight issues, and colitis prompted a pivot from academia to health coaching, emphasizing ownership of wellbeing through science and practical lifestyle strategies. - Cohen highlights that she values rigorous science but seeks practical lifestyle strategies to empower clients to understand their biology and take ownership of their health. - Dance, embodiment, and biology: - Cohen describes taking up social dancing (salsa, bachata, merengue, fox trot, hustle) and training intensely. She explains dancing challenges the brain in novel ways, requires being guided by a partner, and expands neural connections. - The host shares similar experiences with dance, noting body memory across decades and the importance of movement, rhythm, and social connection for health. - Mitochondria, heteroplasmy, and light: - Cohen explains mitochondria as the battery of the cell, with their own circular DNA and multiple roles in ATP production, biosynthesis, and epigenetic regulation. Heteroplasmy, the mutation burden in mitochondrial DNA, reflects dysfunction that can lead to energy production deficits across tissues. - She notes three key mitochondrial outputs: - ATP production powers cellular processes and metabolism. - Metabolic water production (including deuterium-depleted metabolic water). - Biophotons, photons largely in the UV range, emitted by mitochondria and nucleus during electron transport; older, sicker individuals emit more light due to increased permeability of the system. - Cohen argues aging mirrors mitochondrial heteroplasmy and mutation accumulation, with higher mutation burdens in tissues like immune cells, gut, liver, and brain associated with disease. She also discusses that mitochondria contribute to energy, water, and biophotons, and that modern life elevates heteroplasmy by lifestyle choices. - She argues heteroplasmy can be slowed or sped, and that there are actionable interventions—though the exact list is not exhaustively enumerated in this segment. - Why mitochondrial health isn’t the central target: - Cohen says mitochondrial health research is less profitable because it emphasizes lifestyle and environmental changes rather than drugs, which affects funding and research direction. She describes a system where focusing on broad environmental and lifestyle changes could be financially less lucrative than drug-centered approaches. - She expands on historical dynamics in science, including siloing of scientists and the development of a paywalled academic publishing model, suggesting that the system discourages holistic, integrative approaches that would unify mitochondrial biology with systems biology. - Light, circadian biology, and UVA/UVB: - The discussion shifts to light as a regulator of mitochondria. Cohen divides the sun’s spectrum into ultraviolet (UVB and UVA), visible light, blue light, and near infrared (NIR). She emphasizes that near-infrared light penetrates deeply and stimulates mitochondria, while UVB promotes melanin production via POMC and MSH peptides, affecting energy balance, mood, and metabolism. - UVB light triggers alpha-MSH and beta-endorphin production, the latter contributing to mood and dopamine support, and helps regulate energy expenditure and appetite via POMC-derived pathways; UVB exposure supports melanin synthesis, redox balance, and photoreception across tissues. - UVA light activates Neuropsin receptors on eyes and skin, aiding circadian entrainment and nitric oxide production, which improves vasodilation and nutrient delivery. Neuropsin is present in skin and testes; its stimulation is linked to testosterone and fertility enhancements. UVA also helps anchor local circadian rhythms in tissues. - Cohen discusses the misperception that UV light is universally harmful and argues that melanin is not only protective but can facilitate energy capture from high-energy photons to support energy metabolism in humans. Melanin’s roles extend beyond protection to potential energy transduction, with POMC, MSH, and alpha-MSH linking light exposure to metabolic regulation. - The My Circadian app is recommended as a tool to track sunrise, UVA/UVB rise, and lux (brightness) to optimize exposure. Cohen notes indoor environments rarely exceed 1000 lux, while outdoor brightness can reach 60,000–60,200 lux, significantly impacting serotonin production, mood, and cognition. She emphasizes the importance of bright daytime light for circadian alignment and melatonin suppression at night. - Infrared, LEDs, and indoor lighting: - The conversation covers lighting technologies, noting fluorescent tubes and LEDs minimize near-infrared and maximize blue light, which disrupts circadian rhythms and flicker, stressing the eyes and sympathetic nervous system. Cohen argues that modern lighting deprives people of infrared and UV radiation, both critical for mitochondrial function and circadian health. - She criticizes the push for energy efficiency that reduces thermal and infrared energy, arguing it contributes to systemic health issues. She emphasizes the importance of incandescent and near-infrared-rich lighting for indoor environments and sun exposure to sustain metabolic health. - Grounding, EMF, and environmental exposure: - Grounding (direct contact with the earth) is presented as a way to discharge excess positive charge in tissues, reducing inflammatory burden and supporting mitochondrial function. Cohen shares practical grounding instructions—grounding directly to the earth when possible, wearing natural fibers, and using grounding footwear. - Non-native electromagnetic fields (EMFs) from Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, 5G, and other sources are discussed as contributors to mitochondrial dysfunction and inflammation. Cohen cites Robert Becker’s historical work on non-thermal EMF effects and Havana syndrome as context for potential biological risks. She suggests practical mitigation, including reducing EMF exposure, using Ethernet where possible, and using tinfoil to shield exposure in certain situations. Plant life can absorb EMF, and grounding, sunlight, and strategic use of red and infrared light are recommended to compensate where exposure is high. - The discussion includes practical home strategies, EMF-blocking window panels, EMF-blocking paint, and even temporary shielding (e.g., tinfoil) as a do-it-yourself mitigation approach. - Travel, circadian disruption, and protocols: - Cohen outlines travel challenges: high altitude cosmic radiation exposure (non-AVMF exposure), cabin EMFs, circadian misalignment, and sedentary behavior. She suggests pre- and post-travel strategies such as grounding, sun exposure, hydration, lymphatic support, and blue-light management to ease time-zone transitions. - She promotes an ebook protocol focused on lymphatic support and circadian realignment, available for purchase, with a holiday discount code holydays. Blue-light blocking strategies and red-light strategies are included to facilitate adaptation to new time zones. - Health, mental health, and pediatric considerations: - The hosts discuss mental health concerns, including PTSD, anxiety, and depression, emphasizing circadian regulation, light exposure, sleep hygiene, and reducing screen exposure. Cohen notes the importance of bright daytime light and a dark, cool sleeping environment for sleep quality and mood. She mentions a study showing even small nighttime light exposure can influence daytime metabolic markers, emphasizing the importance of darkness at night. - Birth, medications, and vaccines: - They touch on birth experiences, epidurals, and how early life interventions can influence long-term health and microbiome development. Cohen discusses pain as a portal to healing and critiques reliance on certain pharmaceutical approaches. - On vaccines, Cohen describes observed adverse effects post COVID-19 vaccination, including histamine issues, barrier permeability, and rapid cancer reports linked to vaccine exposure, while underscoring the lack of widespread funding to investigate these relationships. She mentions turbo cancers and batch variation as topics already discussed by researchers like Kevin McKernan and a need for independent inquiry. - Decentralization, science, and Bitcoin again: - Cohen envisions a decentralized health system in which multiple modalities (acupuncture, Chinese medicine, Ayurveda, allopathic medicine) can be tested for proof of work, with outcomes guiding what works best for individuals. She believes decentralization is necessary for genuine innovation, with a future vision of a decentralized, funded light research lab and a retreat model to study circadian biology, mitochondrial function, and nature-based health in diverse environments (North America and equatorial regions). - She sees Bitcoin as a tool that enables financial sovereignty and autonomy, providing an opportunity to fund decentralized science and publish findings on blockchain to protect against censorship. She highlights the potential for Bitcoin to support a lab through deflationary funding and to empower researchers and patients alike. - Closing: - The conversation closes with practical resources: Thinkific-hosted classes, an online book club, and a QuantumU course that reframes science education around decentralized, nature-based principles. Cohen emphasizes accessible contact options (Instagram and email) and a holiday discount for courses and ebooks. The participants express enthusiasm for ongoing collaboration, travel and events, and continued education in Bitcoin, science, and holistic health. Overall, the episode centers on mitochondria as a foundational health driver, the essential role of light and circadian biology in energy, mood, metabolism, and aging, and a call for decentralized, nature-aligned science, with Bitcoin framed as a funding and governance tool to empower individuals and researchers to pursue health innovation beyond centralized institutions.

- First of all, red light therapy, when done properly, can stimulate collagen. - It can stimulate the growth of fibroblasts in the skin and decrease the appearance of wrinkles and fine lines. - Number two, it actually decreases inflammation and increases blood flow, which is very useful when talking about rejuvenation. - It can also improve wound healing and decrease hair loss, and it's been used for many years successfully to do this. - Now red light therapy can also reduce acne and eczema. - Some people have also reported a decrease in the incidence of cold sores. - If you're taking certain medications, it can actually increase the risk of complications. - So you might wanna talk to the doctor who's prescribing your meds and see if red light therapy is gonna be safe for you before you start. - In any case, if you're using

Red light therapy, or photobiomodulation, is described as the body responding to light it is biologically designed to respond to, especially red light and near-infrared light. Jonathan Otto explains that the technology has historical roots, with Nobel Prize context in 1903 for light therapy (Niels Ryberg Finsen) and early work by John Harvey Kellogg; red light therapy as known today was advanced by Andre Mester in the 1960s and further developed with LED technology funded by NASA, enabling high power delivery with minimal heat. Key evidence and claims: - In major clinical studies, red light therapy is being explored as an alternative or adjunct to palliative chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery in cancer. The Lancet Oncology published a trial with 413 men in which the red light group did almost 400% better than the non-red-light group; only 6% in the red light group required surgery versus 30% in the non-red light group, a claimed 500% difference in that aspect. - In a lymphoma pilot study (PubMed, 2006), three patients achieved complete remission within a week after photodynamic therapy with methylene blue, with no side effects reported and pain easily managed. - University College London conducted studies showing 49% remission in a red-light group versus 13.5% in a non-red-light group in a prostate cancer context when combined with a photosensitizer; separate eyesight research with 6, seven 0-nanometer parameters demonstrated immediate improvements, with larger long-term effects reported in various other conditions. - Red light therapy is claimed to impact a broad range of conditions: eyes (macular health, myopia in children), autoimmune diseases (Hashimoto’s thyroiditis, autoimmune thyroiditis), hair loss (androgenic alopecia), skin conditions (acne, eczema, psoriasis), chronic pain (arthritis, back pain), depression and anxiety (rapid improvements noted within hours in some studies), and post-stroke or neurodegenerative conditions (mood, cognitive function, overall energy). - Specific eye-related findings include a large trial where 41 clinical trials in children showed the therapy stopped vision worsening in many cases; in the UCL eyesight study, 70–80% near-infrared penetration targets deeper tissues, with evidence of rapid improvements in vision when light was delivered in the morning or near the eyes at 670 nm in LED form. - In thyroid and metabolic contexts, there are reports of thyroid medication reduction and remission in chronic autoimmune thyroiditis with certain dosing regimens (e.g., 20 minutes twice a week for five weeks in a trial cited), and a Hashimoto’s thyroiditis study showing substantial medication reduction. - Hair growth is reported to respond to red light therapy due to stimulation of hair follicles and scalp stem cells; anecdotal reports include improved hair density and delayed graying in some individuals. - The therapy is claimed to affect fat loss via photonic lipolysis and to modulate mitochondrial function, with mitochondrial chromophores described as light receptors in about 25% of cellular organ content, generating reactive oxygen species and ATP to drive cellular energy. - A long-COVID study by the European Society of Medicine reported four sessions of 64–84 minutes each yielding total remission of all symptoms in 60 of 62 participants within one week; two others improved with the same protocol. - Dosing guidance and safety: thousands to millions treated with red light therapy have reported minimal adverse effects; overexposure can occur, but the majority of clinical experience indicates a favorable safety profile; a dark period and sleep in darkness are noted as important to maximize benefits. - Delivery devices: panels that deliver broad-spectrum light (including multiple wavelengths such as 630 nm, 660 nm, 670 nm, 810–860 nm, 1060 nm) are preferred for broad organ coverage and deeper tissue penetration; these devices aim to deliver high irradiance (e.g., over 200 milliwatts per square centimeter at about three inches) to accelerate healing and support whole-body photobiomodulation. - Practical use: exposure parameters vary by condition, with some studies showing immediate or rapid improvements (e.g., eyesight within 24 hours in some trials; depression or anxiety improvements within hours; autoimmune symptoms over weeks), while others report improvements sustained for months if therapy is continued, though some benefits persist beyond cessation in certain conditions. Historical and practical context: - The interview frames red light therapy as a natural, noninvasive modality that aligns with the body’s use of light for healing, contrasts it with more invasive conventional therapies, and positions it as having broad clinical study support across multiple journals (including The Lancet Oncology, British Medical Journal, and other major journals). It’s presented as a scientifically backed, broadly applicable therapy that can be used at home with high-quality devices. Applications mentioned: - Cancer and tumor-targeted approaches (photodynamic therapy), eyes and vision, autoimmune thyroid disease, skin conditions, hair growth, wound and tissue healing, pain and inflammation, mood disorders, long COVID, and metabolic effects such as fat reduction and thyroid regulation.

The human “light body,” also called the subtle body, body of light, or luminous vehicle, appears across numerous traditions as a non-physical radiant form of the human being that transcends material dimensions of reality. Many traditions say it can only be realized through an evolved state of consciousness and describe it as a form of interdimensional travel and the only way to escape the cycle of death and rebirth. Neo-Platonic and theosophical schools taught of a luminous body. Gnosticism and Hermeticism describe an astral body and a subtle body, and similar concepts are said to exist in practically all eastern traditions. Tibetan Buddhism calls it the rainbow body, with centuries of documentation of those who achieved it; the transcript claims there are nearly 200,000 documented rainbow body events in Tibetan history. Father Francis Vincent Tiso, described as a Roman Catholic priest and interfaith expert on Tibetan Buddhism, is said to believe that Tibetan rainbow body teachings may have been influenced along the Silk Road by the Christian belief in the resurrection of the body. He is quoted as writing that both rainbow body and resurrection are claims that make statements about human possibilities attainable by all human subjects under certain conditions. The light body is presented as a vehicle for travel through higher dimensions and as a way to heal the human body. The transcript then turns to “scientific evidence,” stating that modern science calls a faint visible light emitted by the human body UPE (ultra-weak photon emission). It describes this light as requiring sensitive cameras and darkness to capture, and says the official scientific narrative attributes it mostly to oxidation of biomolecules, disappearing at death because metabolic processes stop. The transcript also says studies show red and near-infrared light is capable of healing the body. It further claims that luminous biophotons in the brain increase with meditation. A 2012 study is said to have measured increased photon emissions from participants’ heads when they imagined seeing a white light, described as a common meditative visualization practice. A 2016 study is said to have measured up to a 600% increase in biophoton emissions during meditative practices, claiming that focused mental states can amplify biophoton output. It claims this matches what “ancients” taught about a luminous rainbow resurrection body: the potential to heal and be cultivated into a vehicle of transcendence. Examples include ancient Egypt’s union of light, spirit, and body (Merkaba concepts: Mer, Ka, and Ba). The transcript describes the Merkaba as an energy field comprised of two counter-rotating tetrahedrons used by priests and pharaohs for interdimensional travel and spiritual ascension. It adds that the “secret of the flower of life” states the Merkaba becomes manifest by visualizing two counter-rotating intersected tetrahedrons and claims these fields exist naturally and are moved by intention. It also claims that the third Reich’s classified project “Die Glock” was based on counter-rotational spin of energy created by a mercury-based substance known as serum five two five, and that similar counter-rotation energy appears in Victor Schauberger’s repulsine motor and in Otis T. Carr’s OTC X one craft, with both spin physics and non-material physics described as hidden from the public.

Speaker says that long wavelength light—red light from sunlight, infrared, and near infrared light—is beneficial for us. It is low energy, can pass into the body, and supports mitochondrial health by charging the mitochondria. The speaker recently learned that the water surrounding the mitochondria absorbs red light in the same way the ocean absorbs red light, which is why the ocean appears blue and reflects blue. The mitochondria are described as having a “mini ocean” surrounding them that absorbs red light.

Researchers recruited 22 individuals and randomized them into two groups: control and experimental. Both groups had a baseline color contrast test, which assesses visual function. Participants worked in a building with abundant artificially lit LEDs and fluorescent lighting, a spectrum with a big spike in blue light and very low red light and zero infrared light. After two weeks of working under these conditions—described as conditions the participants had experienced for the last two years—there were zero improvements in color contrast in the control group. In the experimental group, researchers added two desk lamps, each equipped with a 60-watt incandescent bulb. The incandescent bulbs provided a spectrum that added abundant infrared light, introducing longer wavelengths similar to sunlight. After two weeks of this infrared light supplementation, color contrast tests were retaken. The experimental group showed a 28% improvement in protan thresholds and a 24% improvement in tritan thresholds. After the incandescent lights were removed, improvements persisted four weeks later and six weeks later, with no other changes to the lighting. The mechanism behind these results centers on retinal energy metabolism. The retina is rich in mitochondria, requiring substantial energy. The electron transport chain in mitochondria handles energy transformation. Two scenarios are described: shining red and infrared light on mitochondria versus blue light. - Blue light: Absorbed by porphyrins in the mitochondria, leading to the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS). Excess ROS reduce ATP production, diminishing energy available to retinal cells and impairing function. - Red and infrared light: Absorbed by cytochrome c oxidase and by nano water around ATP synthase. Absorption releases nitric oxide, allowing oxygen to enter and form water. The longer wavelengths are also absorbed by nano water around ATP synthase, reducing viscosity and enabling the rotor to run faster, generating more ATP and providing more energy for retinal cells to function properly. The speaker attributes the observed improvements to these mitochondrial light–energy interactions, particularly the enhanced ATP production from red and infrared light. A practical takeaway is proposed: add incandescent lighting to the environment.

German doctor Alexander Wunsch, a photobiology expert, explains the hidden dangers of modern lighting. With the shift to energy efficient LEDs, we’ve lost out on the health benefits that infrared radiation in traditional incandescent bulbs and candlelight used to provide. Infrared and near infrared light can penetrate as much as an inch into tissue, even through clothing. Unlike natural sunlight, LEDs lack the near infrared light that’s essential for cellular repair, especially in the eyes and mitochondria where energy is produced. Infrared light can actually produce energy in your cells. Overexposure to the blue wavelength of light emitted by LEDs can lead to serious health issues like macular degeneration, which is the number one cause of blindness as we age. It also blocks melatonin release. In addition, these LEDs flicker rapidly, which isn’t visible to us, but it can disrupt cellular function and impact our mental and hormone health. So Wunsch suggests sticking with warm, clear incandescent bulbs, the old fashioned kind, if possible, especially in the evening, and getting natural sunlight exposure during the day. Now it’s not practical to avoid LEDs altogether. He acknowledges that reality. But when you need LED lighting, don’t just buy the cheapest ones. Buy bulbs with a low flicker rate, a high CRI, and R9 values above 90 if you can, because those are closest to natural light. The Centric series by Waveform Lighting and the Sora Vivid a 19 at polarray.com are good choices.

Speaker critiques LED red-light therapy, calling LEDs unhealthy and arguing they emit radio frequencies like street lights; asserts there are no health studies showing LEDs are healthy. Claims Monsanto and IBM created the LED to push robotic, transhuman, or AI futures and that red light therapy is nonsensical unless used outdoors. Advises using incandescent or halogen instead of standing in front of a pane of LEDs. Links LEDs to blindness, cataracts, brain fog, and nausea; notes how shoppers report feeling sicker under store lighting. Argues there is no heat from LEDs and questions the logic of red-light therapy. Promotes sun exposure as the true biohack: sit in the sun for two hours, go out in nature. Says the sun is free and constant, and that most illnesses can be reversed by simply sitting in the sun.

The speaker, a neurosurgeon, claims medicine is “ass backwards” and argues that many health problems originate from light exposure, especially blue light. They assert the alpha wave in the human brain is 7.83 hertz and describe a “direct loop” from the brain to the pineal gland involving balanced energy from blue and red light. They say blue light is “toxic,” makes people fat, and blocks perception of truth when dopamine is low. They also claim energy and mass are the same thing, differing only by environment, and describe the eye (the pupil) as a “perfect black box radiator” where UV light passes through and can be demonstrated with a UVA flashlight and fluorescence. They argue aromatic amino acids absorb UV light because benzene rings function as “photon traps,” and they claim the eye is loaded with these UV-absorbing aromatic amino acids. They connect this to water and coherent domains in water, stating that sunlight-driven exclusion zone coherence in water generates free, delocalized electrons used to run biochemical programs. They further describe UV light hitting proteins in water as creating an electromechanical effect transmitted as sound-like changes in water density, framed as a quantum-mechanical mechanism, and they claim mitochondria produce cytosolic water that surrounds cellular components. The speaker links Schumann resonance to sunlight interacting with Earth’s ionosphere and says the resulting 7.83 hertz entrains humans to generate alpha waves. They claim non-native EMF dehydrates cells by lowering redox potential in mitochondria, reducing water production. They offer a practical analogy: microwaving leftover steak makes it taste like “shoe leather” because microwaves vibrate and rotate water quickly, causing dehydration. They shift focus to the eye’s timing system, saying traditional ophthalmology emphasizes the “camera” (including cataract surgery implants) while missing UV/blue light pathways. They claim cataract implant lenses block UVA/UVB and also block part of blue light (stated as “50%” since a change in 2008). They describe infrared A as a large portion of sunlight reaching Earth and argue blue light bends most via gravitational lensing, landing in front of the retina and contributing to “visual obscuration,” elongation of the eyeball, myopia, retinal detachments, and acute macular degeneration. They connect cataracts to “blue light toxicity,” claiming the brain responds by making the lens black/hazy to protect itself. They describe melanopsin as an opsin in retinal pathways linked to nighttime signaling and melatonin. They then present a controversial claim: central retinal pathway energizes distal brain functions, including turning on the pituitary gland, and they use the historical ophthalmologist Fritz Hallwich to support this. Hallwich, they say, removed cataracts (without intraocular lenses present at the time), documented improvements in growth, metabolism, weight, sleep, animal behavior, coat color, and changes in urinary metabolites of hormones—leading to the claim that “light was able to make chemicals in us that weren’t there before.” They also bring in John Ott, stating Ott used time-lapse and investigations suggesting light affects chloroplast rotation and that retinal pigment epithelium melanin absorbs UV and is associated with a DC electric current that supports tissue regeneration. The speaker argues that when light slows (energy loss), the pituitary gets bigger, and they claim this reflects light being turned into hormones that can alter DNA. They say obesity may relate to insufficient sunlight rather than food intake. They reference medical school training with Nicholas Bazan, stating the eye has more DHA than other brain regions and that the eye’s clock must run faster for synchronization. They further claim blue light acts as an antidote to vitamin A and DHA by making vitamin A (described as yellow) and that opsins in the body depend on vitamin A, linking vitamin A deficiency to obesity via NHANES data. They give “sun’s rules” for timing: they recommend reconstructing morning exposure, including receiving UVA and infrared A earlier, and they claim sunrise patterns regenerate components and support making melatonin first in the eye before generalizing throughout the brain. They argue UVA light helps turn on hormone production, while UVA on skin turns off hormone production in the blood plasma. They also connect UVA light to reducing mitochondrial energy production by turning down ATP generation, stating red light turns on cytochrome c oxidase and UV light turns it off via nitric oxide. Practical advice: they recommend grounding and reducing clothing to allow UV exposure, mention UVA-penetrating bathing suits, suggest infrared A methods such as sauna or geothermal-heated pools, and state that heat is infrared light.

The speaker discusses red light therapy, advocating the use of a red light incandescent bulb that costs about $7 to $10, which you can plug in to treat with red light. They argue you don’t need the masks associated with seizures. They contrast incandescent bulbs with LED masks, stating that the LEDs flicker like crazy, causing nausea, and they emit radio frequencies that are “toxic to your brain” because you are pulsing your brain the entire time. The speaker recommends sticking to old incandescent bulbs, noting they don’t cost much. They comment that the government wanted to ban incandescent bulbs, but claim these bulbs are linked to health issues and are perfectly legal.

Dosing considerations: "spectrum can I get? Then, how long should I do it? And then, how often?" "directly turn up the energy inside of your cells" "So your cellular respiration is going to speed up." "you can throw off a lot more oxidants, lot more free radicals. Pro oxidation." "they directly decrease the free radical buildup and the oxidative formation." "So you're getting the benefit of energy without the benefit of oxidation because the red light has taken care of that." "through those and some other means, are going to help the cell not only to kick start and to work faster, but you're going to help the cell to build up more healing capacity." "If you have a sick cell that is running slowly and the mitochondria in the cell are running slowly, it cannot heal like it ought to."

Mark Baker, founder and president of the Soft Lights Foundation, and Clayton (Speaker 0) discuss the health and societal concerns around LED lighting. Baker argues that LED lights are devastating to health due to their blue-rich spectra, prevalence in night environments, and the resulting impact on sleep, mood, circadian biology, and overall well-being. He describes personal experiences that motivated his activism, including a mental breakdown linked to LED exposure and a subsequent shift to full-time advocacy. Baker explains that LEDs are now ubiquitous: LED headlights in cars, blue-rich LED streetlights, general-service LED lamps in homes, and intense LED indicators on appliances. He notes that emergency vehicles with flashing LEDs are also problematic for some people. He acknowledges that the issue feels overwhelming to many, including bureaucrats, which adds to the difficulty of solving it. The conversation delves into Baker’s backstory. In the mid-2010s, as high-powered LED lights proliferated, he noticed blue-rich headlights and 5,000 Kelvin streetlights that disrupted his psychological wellbeing. Living in California, he experienced intense lighting at night from apartment windows and, after attempting to contest changes with city officials, suffered a severe mental breakdown when his school district refused to turn off the LEDs. This led to hospitalization and redirected his career toward advocacy, studying physics, government regulation, and organizing with others suffering similarly. Baker emphasizes that many people experience LED-induced sensitivities: migraines, epileptic seizures, sleep disruption, and even suicidal thoughts for some. He notes that individuals with astigmatism report driving difficulties due to LED headlights. He characterizes the public as having diverse responses: some people are highly sensitive to LEDs, others notice little to no effect. He frames the community as “canaries in a coal mine” for broader environmental and health impacts. The discussion covers the science of light. The body has photoreceptors beyond the eyes, including in skin and tissues, with blue wavelengths around 450 nanometers linked to circadian regulation. He asserts that artificial light at night interferes with melatonin suppression and cellular repair processes, thereby increasing health risks. He argues that the spectral distribution of many LEDs, with a prominent spike in blue light and no infrared, contrasts with incandescent light, which has a warmer, red-yellow spectrum and includes infrared. He maintains that LEDs are further from natural light than incandescent sources and that this spectral shift affects mood, sleep, and health. On policy and regulation, Baker critiques the 2005 Energy Policy Act, which directed the Department of Energy to pursue solid-state lighting and set a minimum luminous efficacy of 45 lumens per watt. He contends that the DOE did not coordinate with the FDA to ensure safety standards, so LEDs entered markets without assessing flicker, color temperature, or overall quality. He suggests this failure contributed to a mismatch between efficiency goals and health outcomes. He calls for reintroducing safe, healthy lighting and undoing “the effective ban on incandescence,” arguing that incandescents were healthier and that the current LED emphasis ignores health impacts. Baker discusses practical implications for sleep and daily life. He recommends reducing exposure to night-time LED lighting, using warmer color temperatures (around 2,700 Kelvin or lower), and installing measures to limit blue light in bedrooms. He notes that even skin exposure to light and non-visual photoreceptors can affect sleep. He mentions that some LEDs are being redesigned to imitate incandescent light, including “natural light” LEDs with broader spectral distributions and devices that incorporate infrared light to soften nighttime exposure. He also highlights the challenge of modern fixtures that integrate LEDs into fixtures rather than as replaceable bulbs, complicating the shift away from blue-rich lighting. The Soft Lights Foundation provides resources at softlights.org, including a campaign to ban blinding car headlights and an LED incident report for the FDA. Baker mentions a Change.org petition with tens of thousands of signatures, a database of incident reports to push regulatory action, and a resources section with scientific articles. He encourages joining the Ban Blinding LEDs Facebook group and engaging with regulatory and legal efforts (e.g., lawsuits) to address LED-related health concerns. In closing, Baker argues the system resists change, driven by arrogance, incompetence, negligence, and financial incentives, but denies a conspiratorial killing intent. He invites listeners to learn more, sign petitions, and consider environmental and health impacts when choosing lighting options.