reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The mainstream media is attempting to cancel the People's Party of Canada (PPC), but due to their growth, they are starting to receive attention. Maxime Bernier, the leader of the PPC, emphasizes that many Canadians are unaware of their existence and that the party was excluded from national debates during the electoral campaign. The PPC stands alone against vaccine passports and lockdowns, which all other parties support. Bernier believes that after the election, the PPC will have elected candidates, allowing them to engage in national conversations that the media cannot ignore. Bernier reflects on his political journey, admitting he initially supported Bill C-16, which he later recognized as a threat to free speech. He founded the PPC in 2018 due to dissatisfaction with the Conservative Party's direction under Andrew Scheer. Bernier argues that the PPC is the only party with a clear policy on gender identity and that their platform is based on individual freedom and personal responsibility. He critiques the Conservative Party for drifting leftward and emphasizes the importance of presenting alternative ideas, even at the risk of vote-splitting. Bernier believes that the PPC's growth in polls indicates a shift in public sentiment, as more Canadians seek representation for their values. The discussion also covers issues like COVID-19 measures, immigration policy, and the economy. Bernier advocates for a decentralized government, allowing provinces more autonomy and responsibility. He argues against the current equalization formula, suggesting it disincentivizes provinces from developing their resources. Bernier concludes that voting for the PPC is a vote for common sense and freedom, aiming to bring important discussions to the forefront of Canadian politics.

In this special Knowledge Project episode, host Shane Parrish sits down with Pierre Poilievre to unpack a broad critique of Canada’s political and economic landscape through the lens of youth, housing, and opportunity. The conversation centers on the purpose of government, with Poilievre arguing for a limited state that focuses on essential functions like defense, border control, and basic infrastructure, while empowering private markets and voluntary exchange to drive growth. He contends that Canada’s current trajectory—characterized by high spending, regulatory complexity, and a reliance on foreign labor—has strained young people and squeezed the middle class, proposing tax cuts on investment, capital gains relief for reinvestment in Canada, and streamlined permitting to accelerate homebuilding. The discussion also probes national identity, emphasizing freedom as a unifying value and calling for a shift toward a more self-reliant, Canada-first approach on the world stage. Poilievre delves into immigration policy, arguing that rapid population growth without commensurate expansion in housing, healthcare, and jobs creates bottlenecks and erodes social cohesion. He frames the solution as unlocking domestic resources, enhancing private sector incentives, and reorienting foreign aid toward core national priorities, paired with a stronger emphasis on personal responsibility and aspirational economics. Throughout, the host and guest wrestle with questions of media independence, regulatory overreach, and the dangers of bureaucratic entanglement, suggesting that a more vibrant, competitive information ecosystem is essential for a healthy democracy. The episode closes with reflections on resilience, hope, and the daily choices that shape Canada’s long-term prospects for affordability, opportunity, and national strength.

In a conversation between Jordan Peterson and Minister Dan Williams, the focus is on the addiction crisis and homelessness in Alberta, Canada, and the contrasting political dynamics between Alberta and the federal government. Williams discusses the detrimental effects of addiction, particularly related to opioids, emphasizing that addiction is a disease requiring intervention and recovery, not mere harm reduction. He critiques the federal government's enabling policies, which he believes exacerbate the crisis, and highlights Alberta's proactive approach to treatment and recovery. Williams outlines the structure of Canadian politics, explaining the division of powers between federal and provincial governments, and the unique challenges Alberta faces, particularly regarding resource management and transfer payments to other provinces like Quebec. He argues that Alberta's contributions to the Canadian economy are often overlooked, leading to feelings of being treated as second-class citizens. The discussion also touches on the historical context of political parties in Canada, noting a shift in the NDP's identity and the emergence of a new breed of conservative leadership in Alberta, represented by Premier Danielle Smith. Williams emphasizes the importance of community and purpose in recovery from addiction, advocating for a comprehensive treatment model that includes detox centers, long-term recovery facilities, and community support. Williams critiques the current harm reduction policies, particularly the distribution of high-powered opioids under the guise of "safe supply," arguing that they lead to increased addiction and societal harm. He asserts that addiction must be addressed as a public health issue, with a focus on rehabilitation rather than enabling continued substance use. The conversation concludes with a call for compassionate intervention, emphasizing the moral responsibility of society to support individuals struggling with addiction. Williams plans to introduce legislation aimed at providing necessary interventions for those at risk of harming themselves or others due to addiction, framing it as a societal obligation to foster recovery and restore dignity to individuals affected by addiction.

In the conversation, Joe Rogan and Pierre Poilievre discuss governance, economic policy, and the role of government in daily life, weaving personal history with a vision for a freer, more efficient Canada. Poilievre emphasizes reducing bureaucracy and accelerating permitting to unlock Canada’s vast resource potential, arguing that leaner government and fast, predictable regulatory processes would spur investment, create jobs, and strengthen national security through strategic resource stockpiles. He frames his leadership project as restoring freedom by limiting government overreach and preserving individual responsibility, using historical touchpoints such as the Magna Carta and economic examples to illustrate how restraint on state power coincides with prosperity. The dialogue also explores how fiscal discipline, like a Pay-Go-inspired approach, could balance budgets and curb inflation, while maintaining social safety nets. Rogan pushes on practicalities, and Poilievre responds with concrete ideas: single-project environmental reviews with firm timelines, pre-permitting, and targeted deregulation to enable energy, housing, and manufacturing growth. The discussion touches cultural and political differences between Canada and the United States, including how each country handles immigration, welfare, and public health policy, along with the importance of safeguarding freedoms during crises such as the COVID era. There is frequent reflection on personal discipline, fitness, and resilience as metaphors for political leadership, linking physical health and mental well-being to a broader sense of societal vitality. The episode also traverses foreign policy themes, trade, and cross-border collaboration, underscoring a shared interest in lower tariffs, stronger continental energy security, and mutual prosperity, while defending Canada’s sovereignty and the value of a distinct national path. The tone remains focused on pragmatic reform rather than ideology, with Poilievre arguing that a freer economy, characterized by real productivity and limited gatekeeping, could uplift ordinary Canadians and reshape the political landscape in Canada and beyond.

In a conversation between Jordan Peterson and Alberta Premier Danielle Smith, they discuss the challenges facing Alberta, particularly regarding its relationship with the federal government and the energy sector. Smith emphasizes that Alberta's economic success is largely due to its energy resources, which have been hindered by federal policies. She argues for increased provincial sovereignty and the need for Alberta to assert its rights, particularly through the Alberta Sovereignty Act, which aims to limit federal interference in provincial matters. Smith highlights the historical context of Canada's confederation, noting that both federal and provincial governments have exclusive jurisdictions. She criticizes the current federal government for overstepping its bounds and disrespecting Alberta's autonomy, particularly in resource development. The conversation touches on the detrimental effects of federal policies on Alberta's energy projects, citing the cancellation of major pipeline projects and the lack of support for new developments. The discussion also addresses the broader cultural issues of identity and responsibility among youth. Smith and Peterson argue that young people are seeking meaningful narratives that encourage civic engagement, family formation, and personal responsibility, which they feel conservatives have failed to articulate effectively. They believe that a strong conservative vision can resonate with young people if framed properly. Smith expresses a desire to foster partnerships with neighboring provinces and emphasizes the importance of developing Alberta's resources responsibly while addressing environmental concerns. She advocates for a collaborative approach to energy and resource management, including potential agreements with First Nations communities. The conversation concludes with a focus on the need for conservatives to reclaim the narrative in media and education, emphasizing the importance of presenting a balanced view of issues. Smith outlines her plans for improving healthcare and addressing affordability in Alberta, while also promoting the province's energy capabilities on the international stage. She expresses optimism about Alberta's future and the potential for a coalition among Western provinces to assert their interests more effectively within Canada.