reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The transcript follows a chaotic, multi-voiced discussion centered on political information networks, election integrity, and coordinated activism around protests and media narratives. - Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 repeatedly question the sources of information: “Who the fuck is Jeremy? Where do I get my information? Why did I delete karaoke?” and the same for Jonathan, signaling concern about where information originates and how it is disseminated. - Speaker 2 describes a sense of purpose from sharing information and notes that Wisconsin was the first state where “the evidence that I and my one of my associates, Chris, had put together for Peter, Wisconsin was the first state where it was actually presented, under oath in, you know, a senate… the Wisconsin Senate Committee on Election Integrity.” - Speaker 3 references multiple online presences, including YouTube and Facebook (Jeremy Oliver, Onslaught Media Group), and mentions protesting activities as part of the narrative. - Speaker 4 mentions “Using other state capitals for practice dry runs,” implying rehearsal for protests or political actions. - Speaker 1 indicates a readiness to “storm the capital” and notes that participants are “all actors,” signaling a performative or coordinated element to actions. - Speaker 3, as a journalist or news producer, plans to stream live from protests to show “the real story” and “support the people that are out there fighting for our First Amendment rights.” - A dialogue involving Speaker 1 and Patrick discusses Mary Fanning and Mary Fenix, with questions about speaking to Patrick and perceived fairness in conversations, leading to a strained exchange. - Speaker 5 asserts that “Donald Trump has no business being president,” and introduces a coalition or think tank that includes Biden, Harris, Mike Flynn, and Simon Johnson (an IMF chief economist by birth in England), framing a network with both Democrats and Republicans. - Speaker 3 introduces Brian Gamble as CIO of the America Project, founded by Patrick Byrne, who sits on the Council on Foreign Relations with Stanley McChrystal. The claim is made that Flynn registered Flynn Intel Group from McChrystal’s home; McChrystal is described as an advisor for the Defeat Disinfo Pack, an AI system that detects Trump-trending content and promotes opposing viewpoints. The system is said to share opposing viewpoints, connecting to efforts involving the Flynn network to target the Patriot movement. - Speaker 6 expresses disbelief at the unfolding information, while Speaker 1 dismisses an interruption during a conversation, showing friction in interviews and onlookers. - Speaker 8 details that “the entire Flynn network was there,” naming Ali Alexander (a former CMP member) as a lead organizer, and Michael Flynn’s appearance on the CMP staff roster. The aim is stated as “creating instability as they’re trying to carry out a color revolution.” The speaker lists a list of Flynn network traits: a united and organized opposition, the ability to drive home the claim that voting results are falsified, compliant independent media to inform citizens about the falsified vote, and the mobilization of tens of thousands of demonstrators. - Speakers 9 and 10 discuss 2020 in Maricopa County, noting 395,000 in-person voters on election day (a figure they describe as low due to COVID) and debating how many Republicans intended but did not vote in Maricopa in the midterms. Projections estimate large missed numbers (700,000 or around 150,000 in later drafts), with debate on whether turnout would favor one party given demographics and turnout expectations. - Speaker 8 critiques associated figures: Patrick Byrne, Roger Richards (tattoo of Lucifer, propaganda space films with Jordan Sather), Emily Newman (ties to US Agency for Global Media, linked to Hillary Clinton and John Kerry), and Brian Gamble’s background in information warfare. - There are digressions about fundraising sources, rockefeller connections, and a tension between reform goals and control, with Speaker 12 suggesting figures like Charlie Kirk publicly advocate doing “the same things that got us into this place” to “beat the system,” implying a critique of reform vs. control within the movement. - The dialogue closes with personal anecdotes about Wisconsin politics, a case discussed with a Supreme Court justice race, and a strained, emotional confrontation that underscores distrust and the perception of manipulated information flows.

The speaker highlights the challenges faced by the Republican Party due to the mainstream media and big tech industries working against them. They compare the contrasting treatment of Governor DeSantis and Andrew Cuomo, emphasizing how Cuomo received praise despite his controversial decisions. The speaker points out the double standard in media coverage, where DeSantis faced criticism for minor issues while Cuomo's serious allegations were downplayed. They express the need for more truth-telling and communication with the American people, as the mainstream media's approval ratings are low. The speaker concludes by stating that the situation is ridiculous and calls attention to the ongoing situation.

The speaker asserts that the Washington Post is almost extinct and that the papers are dishonest, claiming that generally people do not believe the media. He emphasizes his perception of widespread negative coverage by stating that he receives a high percentage of bad publicity—specifically describing it as 93% bad press, with some figures he mentions reaching 97%. He characterizes this reporting as fake press and insists that all of it is fake. In discussing a political or administrative matter, the speaker mentions someone named Caroline, stating that she is doing a poor job. He poses a question about whether they should keep her, saying, “should keep we her? I think we’ll keep her,” which indicates a decision to retain Caroline despite his critique of her performance. He reiterates his big influx of negative press and ties it to a broader assertion about the media landscape. The speaker then connects these media criticisms to a broader electoral outcome: he claims to have won “in a landslide” despite the high proportion of bad stories about him. He frames the situation as evidence that “people don’t believe the press.” He expands on the significance of that belief by stating that when people do not believe the press, it is “a very bad thing for our country,” linking public trust in the media to national consequences. Throughout, the core claims revolve around three interrelated points: the media’s dishonesty and unreliability, the overwhelming proportion of negative reporting about the speaker, and the implication that voters’ distrust of the press coexists with a decisive electoral victory. The speaker explicitly labels the press as fake and maintains that the perceived credibility gap—where people do not believe the media—constitutes a detrimental condition for the country. He also presents a practical staffing judgment regarding Caroline, indicating a preferred, despite expressed concern about her performance, and asserts a priority on maintaining current personnel.

The speaker believes dislike of social media is growing, exacerbating the problem of building consensus in democracies. Traditional arbiters of fact have been undermined, and people self-select information sources, creating a vicious cycle. Curbing social media entities to ensure accountability on facts is difficult due to the First Amendment. The speaker suggests winning the right to govern through elections to implement change. The speaker questions whether democracy can survive unregulated social media, stating democracies are deeply challenged and slow to address current issues. The speaker believes the current election is about breaking the fever in the United States.

NPR and PBS heads testified before Congress this week, facing accusations of liberal bias. The question is whether the government should continue funding public broadcasters. Republicans have long sought to eliminate PBS. The speaker believes NPR is far left and that government subsidies are no longer necessary. These outlets became popular when political polarization was lower. Now that Republicans and Democrats are at odds, such organizations are no longer viable as public entities and should be private.

I'm giving a tour of our trailer with sponsors like Beverly Hills Precious Metals and Patriot Mobile. Despite sacrifices, I face hate. Paul Ryan, Reince Priebus, and Robin Vos are college friends and roommates. There's a recall effort against Vos in Racine County, Wisconsin. Text messages reveal tensions between Vos and Mike. Police are hindering signature collection for the recall.

The speaker claims the mainstream media is lying about Vance Luther Bolter's party affiliation. According to the speaker, some states, like Minnesota, do not register voters by party affiliation and have open primary systems. The speaker states that despite serving under Democratic governors, news outlets reported Bolter last registered to vote in 2022 as a Republican. The speaker questions why a registered Republican would work under Tim Walz until 2023. The speaker provides voter information showing Bolter registered as a Republican in Oklahoma in 2004. However, Minnesota voter registration only provides name, birth year, and registration status, not party affiliation. The speaker insists the mainstream media is lying about Bolter's affiliation.