TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

"I'm absolutely fucked as farmers" and "Everything is so fucked," with the speaker saying they do not see anybody surviving this farm crisis. One of the best spawn crops they have ever raised is becoming worthless because, "because of the tariffs, China will not fucking buy it." They note that China is "the only country in the world that buys scorn" (sic) and conclude they are "literally just chopping it and blowing it on the fucking ground because it's fucking useless." They state they will need government assistance "to make it through this fucking crisis and kill these tariffs in." The speaker emphasizes, "Look at I've never raised a spawn crop like this," calling the situation "heartbreaking" and expressing doubt about how they will survive. They recall Trump's claim that "he fucking loved us farmers," and juxtapose it with their reality of "blowing my spawn crop all over the ground." They hope that Trump will "work a deal out where Antarctica and Mars will start buying this sporn and save the farmers." The segment closes with the blunt assertion, "sporn crop, but you're fucked."

I voted for Donald Trump, and now our farm is at risk. We're in danger of losing it because the NRCS isn't upholding their contract with us regarding the EQIP program. This program, which cost-shares improvements like fencing and wells, was funded by the Inflation Reduction Act. However, executive orders have frozen the funding, preventing payments for completed work and future projects. This isn't just affecting me; other farmers are in the same situation. Before making business decisions, I verified the funding was secured per contract, not contingent. Now, they're breaking the contract due to the funding freeze.

Speaker 0 is down $7,000,000 in stocks and crypto due to Trump's tariffs. Speaker 0 has been trying to understand the tariffs, which they see as a trade deficit tariff. The speaker suggests the tariffs are based on a formula to even up the amount of goods traded between countries. According to the speaker, everything is in bad shape because of these tariffs.

I received a list of crops that can be grown next year, and it turns out we can only grow Chinese cabbage. Everything else needs to be harvested by October 1st. It's ridiculous! We'll have to buy celery from Spain, even though it can't be grown there because it's too warm. Who came up with this list? We're not even talking about sustainability anymore. I've been trying to get in touch with the government about these issues, but they're not responding. The problems will be huge next year, and there won't be enough food. I've reached out to people in The Hague, but no one is listening.

I am frustrated and upset about what the Welsh government is doing to us farmers. I have been farming since 1903 and want to pass it on to future generations. I understand the need for some changes in farming practices, but the government's actions feel like they are trying to eliminate us just to meet their net zero quotas. I am willing to do anything to fight for my right to continue farming.

We're at Hidden Rose Farm in Southern Ontario, where we milk about 260 pounds of milk. During the winter months, we produce even more milk because the feed is consistent. However, we're currently over our regulated limit set by the government and the DFO. The problem is that millions of people see this milk being wasted. I have 30,000 liters of milk that I have to dump. As dairy farmers, we have no say anymore on our own farm. I want people to see the pain we go through every day. We've worked hard our whole lives on dairy farms, and this is what's happening.

Check out these insane tariffs that Canada imposed on the US last year: 250% for milk, 291% for butter, and over 200% for whey and cheese. Meanwhile, we charged them far less for the same goods. Since Trump announced tariffs, everyone suddenly became an economics expert. I don't know how tariffs will affect the economy, and neither does anyone else. But I do know tariffs led Apple to build a new factory and hire 20,000 Americans. Honda is building Civics here instead of Mexico. Taiwan Semiconductor is investing $100 billion to build five chip factories in the US. Tariffs pressure China, Mexico, and Canada to stop the flow of fentanyl. Tariffs are one tactic in an economic strategy. Are we willing to tolerate short-term disruption for long-term gain? Macroeconomics are complicated and take time to play out. Are you listening to people who want the President to fail, even if it hurts America?

So, I went off-script a bit tonight, and some folks walked out, but let me set the record straight on a few things. The economy I inherited wasn't a disaster, despite what some might say. Social Security isn't paying out to centuries-old people, and CEOs aren't thrilled about my tariffs. Ford's CEO thinks they'll devastate the auto industry. We've committed less to Ukraine's defense than Europe has, and Biden didn't close a bunch of power plants. Oil and gas production actually hit records under him. Even Doge hasn't claimed the huge savings some attribute to them, and cutting pediatric cancer research, then praising a young cancer survivor? That's just wrong. Oh, and I admitted Elon Musk heads Doge, which might cause some legal issues down the road. Also, about those tariffs, despite my efforts, everyone knows that the costs fall on the consumers.

China consumes 61% of soybeans produced worldwide. Of the soybeans that American farmers produce, 25% currently have been going to China. So it's a five alarm fire for our industry that 25% of our total sales is currently missing. And, right now, we are not price competitive with Brazil due to the retaliatory tariffs that are in place. Our prices are about 20% higher, and that means that the Chinese are going elsewhere because they can find a better value. There's 500,000 of us that produce soybeans, And, we desperately need markets, and we need opportunity, and we need a level playing field so we can compete because we grow a great product, but we had to be price competitive as well. And there's a artificial barrier that is built with these tariffs that makes us not be competitive.

Turn off my water today. Can't pay any of my bills because I can't grow any crops. Leave my water on, defy the water board. They sue me, take my farm. So either way, it it goes. I'm gonna lose my farm. For what? What what gain does the state get for stealing my water. What gain do I get? Nothing. I lose my car. Can't pay my bills. They're not getting no fish back. So when are gonna wake up, California?

A privileged status exists for farms, and I believe we should take action against them, similar to what Margaret Thatcher did to the miners. You mean close them down? Yes, there’s an industry we could do without. If people are upset enough to protest and spray slurry, then we don’t need small farmers. So, you would use heavy-handed tactics to push them out of business? If the public is that angry, it indicates a need for change in the farming industry. Just to clarify, you were a former labor special adviser, right?

Only 43 pounds of fentanyl were found last year, which is less than a carry-on suitcase. The vast majority of fentanyl is brought in through Mexico, not Canada. Last year alone, there was a 2000% increase in illegal fentanyl. You're asking me for the president's justification for these tariffs. It's disrespectful to the families who have lost loved ones to this deadly poison. They are grateful that they finally have a president who is standing up to both Canada and Mexico, and most importantly, to China as well. The president added an additional 10% tariff on China because this deadly poison is being produced there and distributed through our neighbors. There need to be consequences.

The transcript centers on a retrospective beginning with a Casablanca exchange at the end of World War II, where Roosevelt told Churchill that the war wasn’t fought to reestablish British eighteenth-century methods, and Churchill asked what Roosevelt meant. Roosevelt answered with a definition of a system that takes more out of a country than it puts back in. Roosevelt died before the war ended, and the result, as described, was the triumph of British eighteenth-century methods or a system that takes more out than it puts in. The speaker then argues that since World War II, the United States has deteriorated: manufacturing employment fell from 31% of the population in 1950 to 8% today, and when including other goods-producing sectors (agriculture, mining, transportation), the share dropped from 55% to less than 20%. The speaker contends that good-paying jobs, industry, infrastructure, and family farms disappeared, and economic sovereignty was stripped by “British eighteenth-century methods of financialization and free trade,” leading to imports of food and “cheap crap” and an exploding trade deficit. The claim is made that Donald Trump is reversing this trend, with tariffs described as a powerful weapon that the global elites hate, and that they are working to rebuild the U.S. manufacturing base and economic independence. Support for this claim includes concrete numbers: in November, 136 new factories were started, along with 78 processing plants and 199 new warehouses. The narrative emphasizes that, beyond physical growth, there is a reawakening of a productive spirit among the population, especially the youth. An example is given from blue Massachusetts, where young people respond to opportunities in vocational training and productive jobs instead of pursuing liberal arts degrees with heavy debt. The speaker also highlights the Trump administration’s broader vision, including a merger between Trump’s Truth Social and TAE Technologies, described as signaling a revolutionary development: cheap, clean, limitless fusion power that could drive the economy forward and propel humanity into the solar system. The broader strategic claim is that, on the eve of 2026—the two hundred and fiftieth anniversary of American independence—there is an unprecedented opportunity. Trump is described as dismantling the postwar imperial system, ending perpetual wars, rebuilding American manufacturing, and treating nations as sovereign partners rather than pawns on a chessboard. However, the British establishment is portrayed as resisting this transformation, intending to turn back the clock by leveraging assets in Congress, the media, and intelligence agencies to create chaos and turn Trump supporters against one another. The speaker urges listeners not to fall for it and to keep their eye on the strategic picture.

Speaker 0 expresses a visceral rejection of “America first,” declaring, “America only,” and argues that the stance is unacceptable. The post they discuss should anger viewers, focusing on a beef initiative tweet about Trump saying the U.S. would buy Argentina beef. A reporter asks what he says to US ranchers who are “losing their shit.” His answer: “Argentina is fighting for its life. They're dying.” Speaker 0 notes that 77 American cattle producers per day are going out of business and praises Shipwrecked, urging viewers to follow her for opposing Argentina beef and supporting local farmers who would welcome their business. Speaker 1 responds by insisting that Argentina is “fighting for its life,” and that viewers don’t understand the situation. She argues that nothing is benefiting Argentina and that they are “dying” and have no money, while he says he “likes the president of Argentina” and believes he’s trying to do the best he can, though he emphasizes they are not doing well. Speaker 0 pushes back, asserting that America doesn’t care if Argentina is dying. He condemns the government for sending tax dollars to “third world” countries while continuing to send bombs to Israel, accusing the government of “Israel first propaganda.” He claims that $30,000,000,000 is sent to Israel yearly, and suggests that if the government wouldn’t fund Israel so heavily, there would be less objection to buying beef from Argentina. He reiterates that 77 American cattle farmers go out of business every day and contends that more people will awaken to oppose the “America first agenda.” He concludes with a forceful assertion that it is “America motherfucking only,” and tells those not on the “America only” side to “get the fuck out.”

The speaker discusses tariffs and questions their logic, arguing that tariffs are supposed to replace the income tax, but pointing to a pie chart that shows income tax and social security as the large portions, with a small line at the top representing proposed tariffs, and asks how tariffs could replace the income tax unless the system is off the charts and business becomes untenable. The speaker asserts that a recent development shows significant harm to farmers under the tariff regime, noting that Trump plans a $14,000,000,000 bailout for farmers because the tariffs are hurting their income. This is presented as part of the broader argument that tariffs have negative effects on agricultural interests. Turning to historical context, the speaker references the 1893 McKinley tariffs, which Trump allegedly quotes, and claims that such tariffs would lead to an economic depression and an agricultural depression, suggesting a cyclical or predictable downturn as a consequence of protectionist policy. The speaker then recommends reading Secrets of the Federal Reserve by Eustace Mullins, asserting a strong critical stance toward taxation. It is stated that no tax has ever helped the people, that all sides have implemented taxes, and that bankers have “screwed the people.” The speaker emphasizes the importance of being aware of these dynamics, linking taxation to a broader critique of financial and political systems.

Speaker 0: We saw US bankruptcies at the highest rate since Trump's last presidency. We see the economy shuttering due to tariffs. We see vegetable prices going up 40%. There are bunch of different You know why? PPI just said that vegetable price is going up 40%. I'm asking if you know why. Sure. Storms, weather, droughts all over the world. What about electricity prices going up 10%? It has it has to be. Do know when liberation I think if you're gonna throw out Donald Trump is responsible for vegetable, but you should come and know Liberation will be terrible.

An individual in China displays a home allegedly containing no US products, then asks if the listener has Chinese products in their home. The speaker suggests Americans should be angry about China getting rich off of them, possibly for the speaker's entire life. The speaker questions anger directed at Trump and Elon Musk, especially in light of Trump's tariffs on China.

My tomatoes are rotting, and I’m not making any sales. It’s been terrible since Trump threatened to deport everyone. Nobody’s coming to the farmer’s market anymore. Look at all this produce—I’m practically giving it away. I’m forced to sell a whole box of corn for just $15. It’s a disaster.

Privileged farmers are a concern, and I believe we could manage without them, similar to how Margaret Thatcher dealt with the miners. So, you would essentially push them out of business? Yes, if people are upset enough to protest and spray slurry, we don't need small farmers. Just to clarify, you were a former labor special adviser, right? Yes, emphasis on "former." Let's move on to Ed Miliband.

We used to be the biggest producer of Pluto, but now we have nothing. People are frustrated and want Trump back. They question when America was ever great, as they struggle with gas, electricity, jobs, and food. Many are waiting for stimulus checks and extra food stamps. They want to know why anyone supports Joe Biden. People feel silenced and helpless, while the Democrats promise a Green New Deal for 2030 but lack plans for electricity. The speaker passionately expresses their desire for Trump's return.

I'm in Sherwood, Connecticut, discussing concerns about Gates and China buying up American farmland. My experience with factory farms in North Carolina highlights this issue. Smithfield Foods, the largest pork producer, partnered with a state senator to pass laws that made it illegal to sue factory farms. They drastically reduced pork prices, driving out 28,000 independent farmers. Those who remained had to sign contracts with Smithfield, losing control over their operations. This model spread to Iowa, giving Smithfield control over 80% of U.S. hog production, which is now owned by China. This shift threatens the vision of American democracy rooted in independent family farms, as industrial agriculture compromises food quality and landscapes. If you support my presidential campaign, visit kennedy24.com to donate.