reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker discusses the possibility of someone new entering the presidential race. They mention the need for adults in the room and criticize the current state of politics. The speaker emphasizes the importance of free speech but suggests that people should be more discerning in what they listen to. They express their willingness to run for president and highlight their independence. The speaker talks about the role of fear in society and media's role in shaping public opinion. They mention their past with Netflix and their ongoing influence. The conversation ends with a discussion about the remaining candidates and the speaker's desire for a fearless leader.

The speaker believes that there is a plan to prevent Trump from becoming president again. They claim that the plan involves someone within their own party who will be propped up as a candidate to keep the war machine and censorship agenda going. The speaker is determined to prevent this from happening. They express gratitude for the opportunity to ask a question and appreciate the honesty of the conversation.

The corrupt establishment is targeting me to maintain their power and control over the American people. They want me to renounce my beliefs, stay silent, and accept a corrupt Election. But I refuse to do that because I love our country too much. They're coming after me because I'm standing up for you, and they'll come after you too.

The speaker is asked if they would ever consider running for president, to which they respond that they probably wouldn't because they love what they're currently doing. However, they express frustration with the state of the country and don't rule out the possibility completely. The speaker then encourages an average person to believe in themselves and work hard. They also mention that if they were to run for president, they believe they would win. Various people express doubt and disbelief about the speaker becoming president. The speaker emphasizes their desire to put America first and states that the future is uncertain but will be shaped by the people.

I am running to replace the corrupt political establishment with a government controlled by the American people. The establishment, along with financial and media corporations, exists to protect and enrich themselves. Our campaign poses a true threat to them. This election is a crossroads that will determine if we, the people, regain control of our government. The establishment is responsible for disastrous trade deals, illegal immigration, and policies that have harmed our country. They have destroyed our factories and jobs, benefiting a few large corporations and political entities. This is a struggle for our nation's survival and our last chance to save it. The Clinton machine is at the center of this power structure, as revealed in WikiLeaks documents. The corporate media is no longer unbiased and serves its own political agenda. They will do whatever it takes to stop us. The Clintons are criminals, and the establishment protects them. Only the American people can stop this corrupt machine and save our country. Our civilization faces a reckoning, and I am doing this because I love this country and want to give back. We will take back this country and make America great again.

Put on notice: if you harm us, we will respond in unprecedented ways. The forgotten men and women of our country will no longer be overlooked. The 2024 election is our final battle. They have taken our jobs and wealth, but the future belongs to patriots, not others. We will drive out globalists and communists. America will win again—like never before. We will restore our jobs, secure our borders, and reclaim our dreams.

The speakers discuss the speaker's potential candidacy and the pressure they face from powerful individuals who want to keep them out of politics. They mention that the speaker is not for sale and that money is not the motivation for their involvement. They express frustration with corrupt individuals and their desire for control. The conversation touches on the possibility of election interference and the speaker's determination to fight against it. They emphasize their commitment to representing the people and their refusal to make deals with questionable individuals. The speaker declares their intention to run and be a thorn in the side of those who oppose them, even if it means facing extreme consequences.

The speakers discuss the possibility of running for office and the importance of stopping Donald Trump. They mention the need to make a decision before the party nomination, but it could be as late as spring 2000. They consider different approaches and ways to facilitate discussions. They talk about the energy and dedication required for politics and the potential to heal divisions. They plan to have more discussions and meetings before any official decision is made. The speakers express their frustration with the current political climate and the desire for change. They end the conversation with plans to talk again after further discussions.

The speaker claims they were offered $20,000,000 to withdraw from the senatorial race and run against Rashida Tlaib. They assert the pro Israel lobby will go to any length to remove anyone from U.S. Congress who opposes their agenda and their total unequivocal support for Israel, good, bad, or indifferent. The speaker emphasizes that money should not be the main catalyst for getting people elected, arguing that the pro Israel lobby uses money as its primary tool to threaten politicians. They state that the lobby will spend money against or for politicians to influence outcomes. The speaker urges Americans to elect people who truly represent their values and not those with special interests. They conclude by addressing APEC, saying, "APEC, keep your money in."

Speaker 1 was approached with an offer to pause their political activity, but Speaker 1 is offended, viewing it as an attempt to buy them out of running and a reflection of others' lack of concern for the country. Speaker 1 believes this is about preventing them from winning and defeating Trump, which they see as bad for the country. Speaker 0 suggests it may not be about Trump, but about Speaker 1. Speaker 1 refuses to be bought at any price, stating they are not going to let people who hate the country tell them not to run. Speaker 1 intends to be a "pain" to those trying to stop them and is willing to fight, even if it means risking their life. Speaker 1 urges Speaker 0 to tell them to get behind their campaign. Speaker 1 believes the "swamp" doesn't pre-approve of them because they would root out corruption.

The speakers discuss the speaker's potential candidacy and the pressure they are facing from powerful individuals who want to keep them out of the race. The speaker expresses frustration with being controlled and owned by others and their refusal to work with people who don't align with their agenda. They also mention the possibility of election theft and their determination to fight against it. The speaker declares their intention to run and be a thorn in the side of those who oppose them, even if it means facing extreme consequences.

Speaker 1 expresses hesitancy about running for president but acknowledges being tired of the country's current state. Inflation and a state of emergency at the Texas border are mentioned. The speaker questions why they would give up a good life to return to a difficult situation. However, they also express love for the country and highlight accomplishments such as job growth, peace in the Middle East, and fighting ISIS. The speaker declares their official run for president, promising to bring back jobs and secure borders. They emphasize their dedication to the American people and the ongoing nature of their movement.

The speakers discuss the possibility of running for office and the importance of stopping Donald Trump. They mention the need to make a decision on running before the party nomination, but it could be as late as spring 2000. They consider different approaches and ways to facilitate discussions. They talk about the energy and dedication required for politics and the potential to heal divisions in the country. They plan to have more discussions and meetings before making any decisions. They express frustration with the current political climate and the need for change. The conversation ends with a promise to call back after further discussions.

The speaker talks about being tough and how it doesn't always work. They mention property theft from an elderly woman and the influence of donors and special interests. The speaker claims that they don't want or need the money from these groups and that they will do what's right for the American public.

The speakers discuss their fear of those who oppose them and their determination to stop them. They believe that the opposition will go to great lengths to prevent their cause. They express concern for the state of the United States and the need for people to support their mission. They emphasize the importance of doing the right thing for the country and ask for support. The conversation ends with gratitude and a plea to make the right decision.

The speakers discuss powerful individuals who want to keep Speaker 0 out. Speaker 0 believes they should want him because he is a great candidate, but Speaker 1 suggests it's about control and being on their team. Speaker 0 refuses to make a deal with these people and sees it as a battle worth fighting. Speaker 1 mentions the importance of raising money to win and suggests pausing rather than going away. Speaker 0 disagrees and vows to be the biggest pain for these people, even if it means they might try to kill him. Speaker 1 understands but advises caution.

The speaker acknowledges the strong influence of donors, special interests, and lobbyists over politicians. They claim to have turned down significant amounts of money from these sources, stating that they are not accepting any money from anyone except the people of the country. Speaker 1 brings up the speaker's past relationship with Hillary Clinton, suggesting that it worked for her. The speaker responds by saying that as a businessman, it was their job to get along with people, including politicians. They emphasize that they did a good job in doing so.

Two friends discuss powerful people who want to keep one of them out. They mention corruption and a globalist agenda. The conversation revolves around the idea of being on a team and the control these powerful people want. They discuss offers and the need to raise money to win. One person is adamant about not making a deal with these people and fighting against election theft. They express a willingness to be a pain and continue fighting, even if it means risking their life. The conversation ends with a statement about not needing to explain further.

They discuss their determination to stop someone and not let them succeed. They express their belief that this person will stop at nothing and the need to prevent them from achieving their goals. They mention feeling worried and fearful about the state of the United States and express a desire for support. They argue that voting for them would save the person they are referring to, while voting for someone else would lead to their downfall. They emphasize the importance of doing the right thing for the country and ask for support in the Iowa caucus. The other person agrees to consider their request.

The speakers discuss a potential offer to buy Speaker 1 out of the governor's race. Speaker 1 is offended by the offer and expresses his commitment to running for the betterment of Arizona and the country. Speaker 0 suggests that the offer is a recognition of Speaker 1's power and offers a counter proposal. Speaker 1 refuses to be bought and emphasizes his dedication to the people and his refusal to let those who dislike the country dictate his actions. The conversation ends with Speaker 1 expressing hope for his case and his intention to fight against corruption.

The conversation centers on whether political opponents or powerful interests would buy off or influence a candidate, and what that would mean for a political race and the country. Speaker 0 questions if a price exists to “be bought,” and both eventually reject money as the primary issue, insisting the matter is about the country itself. They discuss the idea that fresh faces are needed because no one in a federal race has ever lost and then won, though Speaker 0 contests that notion as a possibility. They reference powerful people in the East who want to keep the candidate out and are willing to spend heavily, making the conversation forbidden and not to be repeated. A fear is expressed that someone might be offered financial incentives, such as being placed on a payroll to be kept out of the race. They acknowledge the presence of entities willing to “put their money where their mouth is” and the risk that they would “murder” or eliminate opponents to stop certain candidates, describing a dangerous political landscape. The dialogue shifts to the cartel and corruption, with mentions that “the cartel is operating in 50 states,” though details about who knows what are avoided. They discuss the strategy of staying on “the team” of those who want to influence the race, suggesting creditors or backers aim to control the candidate’s actions and align them with a globalist agenda. There is insistence that the person should not “scratch their back” for others in Washington, viewing DC as a “back scratching club.” Speaker 1 argues that defeating Trump is a central aim, claiming that DeSantis is not America first and that removing Trump would be a dangerous outcome for the country. Speaker 0 expresses support for Trump but questions whether he can win again, suggesting the real issue is money and the ability to raise funds to win. They note that consultants benefit from a continuing cycle of money and that those consultants do not want their payday to end. A key sentiment is resistance to being controlled or owned, with Speaker 1 declaring he will not accept backroom deals and will be “the biggest pain” to those trying to control him. They discuss public support and the importance of defending their movement and the people of Arizona, stressing a commitment to carry their torch and voice. The dialogue ends with a defiant vow to continue, even if it risks dangerous retaliation, and a readiness to persevere rather than pause on the battlefield.

The speakers discuss the possibility of running for office and the need to stop Donald Trump's influence on the political process. They mention the importance of having discussions and forming coalitions to bridge the divide between different beliefs. They express a desire to heal the divisions in the country and bring about positive change. The speakers plan to have further discussions and meetings to explore the potential for running for office. They also mention other individuals who could potentially contribute to creating change in the country. The conversation ends with a plan to talk again after the speakers have spoken to someone else.

The speaker claims the Murdochs hate Trump and that they asked him to run for president against Trump in May 2023, after he was fired in April 2023. He states that Lachlan Murdoch told him to run and that they would back him. He says this backing would include Fox News, the Wall Street Journal, and all of their papers. The speaker says the Murdochs wanted him to run to stop Trump, but he would never get elected and he likes Trump.

The speaker discusses the current political landscape and expresses concern about the future. They believe that the system will stop at nothing to prevent Donald Trump from returning to the White House. They suggest that the plan is to make it a two-horse race between Trump and Nikki Haley, who they believe will implement a pro-war globalist agenda and expand surveillance. The speaker emphasizes the importance of the America First movement and the duty to protect it beyond any individual leader. They propose shutting down the FBI, stripping vaccine manufacturers of liability exemptions, and removing Ronna McDaniel from the RNC chair seat. The speaker concludes by stating their commitment to lead the country and work with Trump if necessary.