reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Currently in Panama at Bajo Chiquito migrant camp, a map shows routes for migrants, with HIAS and UN involvement. Criticizes NGOs like HIAS for human trafficking under the guise of Judaism. Calls for defunding and prosecuting these organizations. Describes dangerous conditions, including rape, disease, and lack of basic necessities. Urges shutting down these operations for the safety of migrants. Translation: The speaker is in Panama at a migrant camp, discussing routes for migrants and criticizing NGOs like HIAS for human trafficking. They call for shutting down these operations due to dangerous conditions and lack of basic necessities.

I am in a hotel room, which is a risky situation. This hotel, the Clarion Hotel in West Springfield, is accommodating Haitian migrants. The town is not benefiting from the tax dollars, as they are being given to my friends. I need to leave now.

The speaker entered a facility seeking asylum/refugee status and was offered a taxpayer-funded flight to another city with family. He received a temporary ID and was scheduled for a medical exam. These IDs grant access to migrant shelters, including one on Randall's Island. The speaker visited Randall's Island, where thousands of migrants are housed. He inquired about entering the shelter as an American citizen and was told to leave. He encountered workers and police, observing what he described as problems. He was told there are about 4,000 people in the shelter. He claims people "just come in and take advantage" and that he saw someone "smoking crack right there."

We're looking at the vans that transport Haitian migrants to the meat packing factories. There are multiple houses here that serve as living quarters. These vans specifically drive the Haitians to these factories. Initially, I estimated around 24 vans, but the number seems to be much higher. All these vans transport the Haitians to the meat factories. This is another location for the migrants, one of a couple in this area. The factories used to rely on local labor, but now immigrants make up over 90% of the workforce. This meat packing factory where the Haitians are working ships to Tyson, displacing most of the domestic workers.

A person went to a secret migrant shelter in Massachusetts and was allegedly reported to the police. The speaker claims the shelter spends $100,000 per month on Lyft rides for illegal immigrants. According to the ex-director of the shelter, the shelter has contracts with Uber and Lyft and pays them directly, even for trips to Boston or New Hampshire. The ex-director estimates Uber and Lyft costs totaled $1,200,000 a year. The speaker also claims the shelter charges taxpayers for empty rooms at $180 a night, and also bills for meals in those rooms. The ex-director alleges there is a tremendous amount of waste and/or fraud. The speaker claims to have exposed millions more in fraud and will post another video if they gain 500 followers.

As a Royal Hotel administrator, I oversaw nearly 5,000 migrants. The hotel provided everything from medical care to cribs, with numerous babies born weekly. However, the situation deteriorated rapidly. Alcohol abuse, underage drinking, sexual activity, and even guns became commonplace in this family hotel. I witnessed a drunk ten-year-old with two other intoxicated children whose parents had left them. Security guards frequently dealt with weapons and threats. Staff faced assaults and threats, needing escorts to their vehicles. Shoplifting escalated into physical altercations. My five years at the hotel have been the worst of my career, and the city’s handling of the migrant situation is alarming and unsustainable.

The speaker discusses allegations of fraud involving “immigrants” and says foreigners are “getting popped all over the place for committing fraud.” They claim people in comment sections became angry after they said “they’ve been committing fraud,” with others responding by calling them a MAGA or Trump supporter. The speaker rejects those labels and says they work in human services and were “clearing the … applications,” which they say is how they know fraud was occurring. The speaker argues that Black Americans “could have been out there” snitching like “Nick Shirley,” and claims Black Americans have known about fraud connected to multiple POC immigrant communities “since the fucking nineties.” They say Black Americans have been aware that “$2 in a dream” stories are a lie and that people were receiving government benefits while working “under the table,” including food stamps, housing, AFDC checks, and Medicaid. They also claim these communities use childcare assistance, and they say they know about sending “husbands” to work while the individuals allegedly stay at home. The speaker asserts that Black Americans “know everything about every group of fucking people” because “no one pays us any” attention and because others think Black Americans are “too stupid” or “too incompetent” to read or do math. They describe having worked in “health care administration” and claim familiarity with fraud involving home health businesses and psychosocial rehabilitation services for people with disabilities, including “behavioral” services. They contrast Black Americans not troubling others with “the problem” beginning when others “began to trouble us.” The speaker says they join comment sections to explain what they claim to know, stating that other groups use Black Americans’ name to deflect from their own crimes, including robbing “local government funding,” “state fund government funding,” and “federal government funding.” They reference “anchor babies” and say others should “shut the fuck up” and stop making claims about Black Americans lacking culture or not working hard. They conclude by stating “Black Americans don’t snitch,” but say once others “started drinking your own fucking piss” and “talk[ing] to us crazy,” they “finna tell it all.”

Currently in Panama at the Bajo Chiquito migrant camp, a speaker criticizes HIAS, a Jewish organization, for allegedly trafficking migrants. The camp serves as a starting point for migrants heading to the United States via Costa Rica. The speaker calls for defunding and prosecuting NGOs like HIAS, Catholic Charities, and the United Nations for aiding human trafficking. The conditions at the camp are described as dangerous, with reports of rape, drowning, and disease. The speaker emphasizes the need to shut down the camp due to its unsanitary and hazardous environment.

The speaker is at a migrant center in San Antonio, Texas, alleging that NGOs are facilitating human smuggling into America. He claims San Antonio police officers are contracted by NGOs to guard the area in their official uniforms and cars. The speaker questions the officers about the alleged conflict of interest and whether they are being paid by NGOs, but they offer "no comment." He accuses the NGOs of lying about paying for migrants' flights and scamming the federal government. He asks why the police are not investigating this and are instead taking money from NGOs. The speaker follows a bus allegedly transporting migrants to the airport and back to the migrant resource center. He questions a woman involved in the pickup about her NGO affiliation. He also questions an airport employee about working a side contract approved by the San Antonio PD.

The speaker describes a scenario of a trendy illegal immigrant arriving at the U.S. Southwest border during the 2023 crisis, aided by taxpayer-funded NGOs, and released into the interior with a notice to appear in immigration court. He asserts the person will file a bare-bones, frivolous asylum application, aided by another NGO, and that due to a nearly 4,000,000-case immigration court backlog, the case will take years to be heard. In the meantime, the individual is said to move to a major city, receive taxpayer-funded benefits, commit crimes, be supported by sanctuary-city leadership, and be defended by Democrats who oppose strict immigration laws. The process allegedly drags on with continuances and motions, and years later an immigration judge supposedly denies the asylum claim. The individual is said to appeal to the Board of Immigration Appeals, which allegedly takes months or years, followed by appellate denial in a federal court of appeals. The speaker charges that federal departments and courts expend many taxpayer dollars on such cases, all to deport an apparently frivolous claimant. The focal policy proposal is the expedited removal of criminal aliens act, described as straightforward: criminal aliens cannot misuse the asylum system and must be detained and deported quickly if they are in the U.S. with certain criminal convictions. The speaker notes that current law already permits expedited removal for aggravated felon aliens, who are considered ineligible for asylum and relief and are presumed deportable; this is said to be constitutionally upheld by every federal court of appeals that has addressed it. The bill would expand categories of criminal aliens who may face removal proceedings when in criminal custody and authorize the Department of Homeland Security to place additional criminals in expedited removal. It would allow fast-track deportation for non-lawful permanent residents who are in a gang, transnational criminal organization, or foreign terrorist organization, or who have been convicted of dangerous crimes. The bill’s specified conviction categories include: any felony; any misdemeanor against a member of a vulnerable group; any assault on a law enforcement officer; any sexual offense; any crime of domestic violence; any stalking; any crime against children; sex trafficking or sexual exploitation of minors; sexual abuse of a minor; any activity involving child sexual exploitation; or any violation of a protective order. The term “vulnerable group” covers a child under 16, a pregnant woman, a person with severe disability, and seniors over 65. The speaker cites a poll claiming 78% of Americans support deporting illegal immigrants who have committed crimes, including nearly 70% of Democrats, and asserts broad public support for tougher immigration action while criticizing Democrats’ handling of border policy. He accuses Democrats of previously expanding border openings, cites alleged prior high border encounters, millions of entrants, and 2,000,000 “gotaways,” along with terrorists allegedly released and a record immigration court backlog, blaming the Democrats for a perceived border crisis. He argues recent House actions and votes against border-security measures and declares the bill a step toward securing the border and reforming immigration policy, urging support. He concludes by urging colleagues to back the expedited removal of criminal aliens act.

The speaker boarded a bus full of African and Hispanic migrants heading to Costa Rica, then potentially to the United States. They highlighted the organized nature of the migration, with multiple camps sending thousands daily. The speaker expressed concern over undisclosed bus owners and the influx of migrants, calling it an invasion. They emphasized the issue's significance in an election year and the need for transparency.

The area was filled with migrants, but they were moved inside when filming began. Signs offer free travel tickets out of New York City in multiple languages. The migrants disappeared when approached for questioning.

The Biden administration is flying migrants from South America to the United States, regardless of documentation, aiding human trafficking. Most lack documentation.

The speaker addresses the historic mass migration crisis at the US Southern border, asserting its root cause is President Biden's open border policy, as perceived by immigrating foreign nationals via social media. They are motivated by the success of those who came before them. This has led to record border patrol apprehensions and significant "gotaways." The speaker claims that UN agencies like IOM and UNHCR are materially contributing to illegal border crossings by providing cash, food, shelter, and legal/psychological services along migrant trails. They cite examples of cash debit cards given to migrants, and psychologists helping migrants recover memories of persecution to pass asylum interviews. The speaker suggests this UN assistance, funded partly by the US, keeps migrants on the trail to the US. They also raise national security concerns, citing an example of an FBI watch-listed Venezuelan released by ICE and now pursuing asylum in Detroit.

Anyone can come to the US, like going to New York and seeing the Statue of Liberty. The speaker picked up three guys from Honduras who were at Home Depot and had nowhere to go. One of them, Hector, needs medication twice a day and they all need to use the bathroom. The speaker called to ask if they can stay, but the person on the other end said no because they don't know them. The speaker calls them a hypocrite and tells the guys to leave.

I'm in the Bronx, where 2,200 migrant men will soon be housed in this building. Bronx residents are angry because they weren't consulted. This highlights how sanctuary cities, despite the Trump administration's crackdown on illegal immigration, continue spending millions on migrant housing. For example, a women- and minority-owned business received a $340,000 contract, and Garner Environmental Services got a $450 million contract to manage shelters citywide. Residents are protesting the lack of input on this relocation to this building, which was originally marketed as luxury housing with a rooftop terrace. This is just temporary housing; permanent housing will likely follow, a pattern seen in other sanctuary cities and states. I'm here to bring attention to the Bronx residents' concerns about this situation.

Alright, a dozen or so people exited a van outside Piedra, assisted by two NGO workers. These are illegal aliens. This is happening in broad daylight, while unaccompanied children are moved at night. Many of the 500,000 unaccompanied children brought into our country are missing or dead from organ harvesting. The people are given neon bags by a Mexican NGO and are headed to Terminal A, likely for Frontier Airlines to travel into the interior. I found two illegals escorted by a faith-based NGO out of Mexico and Texas. One was dropped at Delta. Another dozen jumped off the van and one with arrest papers is heading into TSA. Airport employees received memos about my journalism. I'm recording a male from Colombia. He couldn't provide ID, so they sent him to another line, possibly headed to Atlanta via Dallas. He was escorted through the gate without showing ID. This is Kamala Harris's America, with TSA escorting illegals into our country.

The booths for Hyatt and UNICEF are closed, and there seems to be no activity. It's puzzling to see financing from the United States and the European Union linked to illegal migration into the U.S. This raises questions about the motivations behind such sponsorship.

Speaker 0 expresses a significant concern about UK and Europe immigration. They start by stating they are not racist and urge listeners to hear them out. They recount a personal incident from October 2024: a stabbing by a Somalian immigrant while the speaker was defending their girlfriend from being touched. The assailant hit the speaker first, and the speaker only realized they had been stabbed after the confrontation ended. The speaker was in hospital for two days, and after being discharged, they were arrested for defending themselves. Upon returning to Scotland, the speaker had to go to court for the incident, and the assailant did not face charges in the speaker’s version of events. The speaker ended up losing the case in court, and this outcome affected their job prospects because the incident was recorded as assault. They note that this issue has since been resolved in their favor, but they describe a process that still felt unjust. Beyond this personal experience, the speaker claims a broader pattern: it’s happening to hundreds of people a week, and thousands of people a month. They describe the situation as unacceptable and emphasize the core concern that people are being brought from other countries with different cultures who “think it’s okay to do these things” into the country without proper documentation of who they are, where they are, who they have connections to, or what they want to do in the country. The speaker asserts that this lack of documentation and the cultural differences contribute to the problem and that “it’s all just wrong.” The speaker reiterates the central thesis: immigration from other countries with different cultural norms, with insufficient documentation, leads to serious personal harm and a perceived systemic injustice, and this situation is not acceptable. The overall message is a call to reevaluate immigration and the ways individuals are identified and tracked within the country, tying the personal incident to a broader, ongoing pattern that the speaker views as harmful and concerning.

According to the speaker, on September 14 in Bexar County, a Venezuelan migrant was paid to recruit approximately 50 migrants from around a migrant resource center in San Antonio. 48 migrants were lured under false pretenses to stay at a hotel for a couple of days, then flown to Florida and Martha's Vineyard. They were promised work and solutions to their problems, but the speaker believes they were taken to Martha's Vineyard for a photo op and then unceremoniously stranded. The speaker says the migrants were in the country legally and were preyed upon with false promises of a better life. The speaker believes this was political posturing and is opening an investigation. The speaker has been in contact with LULAC National, an attorney representing the migrants, and members of the media. The speaker has names of persons of interest but will not be sharing them.

The first speaker contends that Congress is trying to give $5,000,000,000 of your money for refugee resettlement programs, and that money ends up in places like this. The second speaker identifies the International Rescue Committee as the largest refugee NGO in the country, noting that they get government funds and subcontract the work out to places like this. The first speaker describes the Somali American Community Center as a location that receives grants from the IRC in order to help refugees resettle in America. The second speaker reports that when they went in, they found this: an almost completely abandoned retail space that hasn’t filed taxes in almost ten years. The first speaker states that almost every business in the area is focused on getting refugees on taxpayer funded welfare programs. The second speaker asserts that this is how the largest refugee city in the country is funded. The first speaker adds that this is how over 87% of Somali immigrants end up on taxpayer funded public assistance. The second speaker notes that they spent three days in Little Somalia in Atlanta, Georgia. The first speaker concludes by saying that in the largest refugee center in the entire country, this is what they found.

We're providing free meals for fire victims today, but some individuals taking food from the distribution center do not have burned homes. I confirmed that their houses did not burn down. To investigate further, I visited an evacuation shelter and found that they do not inquire about the legal status of those present. It appears that tax-funded resources are being redirected by the Red Cross to provide food and shelter for illegal migrants instead of solely for fire victims.

The speaker shows how NGOs like HIAS are closely connected to migrant camps, providing maps and instructions for migrants to reach the US. Despite attempts to get information from HIAS, they remain secretive. The speaker calls for these groups to be shut down and their employees arrested for aiding illegal immigration. The speaker emphasizes the need for border security and an end to funding organizations facilitating illegal immigration.

The speaker asserts the primary concern is everyone's welfare and safety, but believes the individuals in question are illegal migrants, not refugees. The speaker claims it's telling that no one specifies what these people are fleeing from, what wars, countries, or persecution they are escaping. Because of this lack of information, the speaker believes they are by definition illegal immigrants and technically criminals. The speaker states they shouldn't be housed in five-star hotels but in cells. The speaker believes they should not be allowed to leave until they pay for their ticket back. The speaker's question is not where they will be moved to in a year, but how they will be removed from the country.