reSee.it - Related Video Feed

After coming out as a conservative on November 5th, I resolved never to be silenced again. Although I had identified as a conservative since 2015, fear kept me quiet for years. Following my public declaration, I faced threats and backlash, losing over 1,500 followers in three days. Instead of feeling defeated, I found liberation in speaking my truth. We’ve allowed the extreme left agenda to flourish because of our silence and fear of consequences. But we have nothing left to lose. When we confront our fears, we realize they often aren't as daunting as we imagined. Just like in "The Sandlot," stepping past our fears reveals that what we dread may not be as threatening as we thought. If you're hesitant to speak out, remember that the weight of silence far exceeds the potential consequences of speaking up.

Our weapon is truth, while their weapon is censorship. We continue to fight on different battlefields, striving to awaken others. We will never surrender, even if we have to shake everyone awake. What troubles me is the increasing censorship that keeps me awake at night.

It's time to stop coddling those who refuse to get vaccinated. They are afraid, plain and simple. We need to stop using euphemisms like "vaccine hesitant" or "vaccine skeptics" to describe them. They're protesting mandates and passports because they're afraid. They claim it's a personal choice or that they're waiting for more information, but it's just fear. We shouldn't sugarcoat it anymore. Apart from those with legitimate medical complications, we must stop coddling these individuals. They are snowflakes, cowards, idiots, losers, and above all, afraid.

People seek comfort in certainty, even if beliefs lack evidence. Criticizing others for being ignorant doesn't improve the situation. Personal experience shows arguing in comment threads is unproductive. Translation: Seeking certainty is common, even without evidence. Criticizing others doesn't help. Arguing online is not effective.

I received two hateful messages in one day, one calling me a racist and the other insulting me as a white person. The person who called me a racist also blamed me for everything wrong with Arabs and blamed them for being troublemakers. I consider troublemakers to be anyone who causes problems and disrupts others' lives, like those who disturb moviegoers. These messages were sent anonymously by people with few followers. One person even wished harm upon me. However, these negative messages are rare, and I am grateful for the overwhelming support I receive. I don't feel the need to respond to these messages because I know my worth and that I am not a racist. I am against troublemakers, and I appreciate well-behaved Muslims who don't deserve the negative image caused by these individuals.

The exchange centers on whether the person being spoken to is the author of a controversial social media post and on whether authorities should press for a response. The conversation begins with an attempt to verify the person’s identity: “Picture to make sure it's you. We're not sure.” The responding party, referred to as Speaker 0, declines to answer without his lawyer present, stating, “I refuse to answer questions without my lawyer present. So I really don't know how to answer that question either.” He emphasizes his stance with a nod to freedom of speech, saying, “Well, you're like I said, you're not gonna is freedom of speech. This is America. Right? Veteran. Alright. And I agree with you 100%.” The officers explain they are trying to identify the correct person to speak with and proceed with the inquiry. Speaker 1 presents the substance of the post in question: “the guy who consistently calls for the death of all Palestinians tried to shut down a theater for showing a movie that hurt his feelings and refuses to stand up for the LGBTQ community in any way, Even leave the room when they vote and on related matters. Wants you to know that you're all welcome clown face clown face clown face.” They ask Speaker 0 if that post was authored by him. Speaker 0 again refuses to confirm, stating, “I’m not gonna answer whether that’s me or not.” The discussion shifts to the underlying concern. Speaker 1 clarifies that their goal is not to establish whether the post is true, but to prevent somebody else from being agitated or agreeing with the statement. They quote the line about “the guy who consistently calls for the death of all Palestinians” and note that such a post “can probably incite somebody to do something radical.” The purpose of the inquiry, they say, is to obtain Speaker 0’s side of the story and to address the potential impact of the post. Speaker 1 urges Speaker 0 to refrain from posting statements like that because they could provoke actions. Speaker 0 expresses appreciation for the outreach, but reiterates that he will maintain his amendment rights to not answer the question. He concludes by acknowledging the interaction and affirming that the conversation ends there: “That is it. And we're gonna maintain my amendment rights to, not answer the question about whether or that's fine.” Both parties part on a courteous note, with Speaker 0 thanking them and wishing them well.

Speaker 0: If there is power and courage in Ram, why hasn't he come to protect you yet? Speaker 1: I cannot disclose the various threats and ways in which harm can be done. Ram is present in every moment, in every aspect, and in every hope. Speaker 0: Ram is present in compassion, peace, unity, progress, and even in the thoughts of enemies. Look at the sins of Ravan, Ram is in your mind, Ram is in my mind. Ram is everywhere. I am excited about the future of India and I admire Modi.

The school district has sent an officer to check on my mental well-being for the second time in three days. I have many troubling stories about the district, and their actions show their fear. They resort to calling the police to intimidate, but I refuse to be afraid. No offense to the officer, who is a kind man, but this behavior reflects cowardice.

You see, Sabrina, read the comments from your own community. You've failed them. You've absolutely failed them. You've cozied up to people and tried to be friends with people who want to see the destruction of the only Jewish homeland. They're they're your friends. I don't associate with jihadists, Islamists, anti Semites, Jew hatred. I won't give them a time of day. You hang around with them. That's the difference between me and you. And I speak facts and truth, and that's uncomfortable for you because you're a coward, and that's it. You have a problem with me because you think you can cozy up and be nice to the Islamists, and they might just leave you alone. Because of people like you, you allow it to happen. Not me. I won't allow it to happen. That's the difference between us.

Those who were considered nerds in high school are now the ones in power, like Mark Zuckerbergs and Fauchis. They have a chip on their shoulder against normal people, making laws and shaping media. It's time to stop being afraid of them and stand up. These former losers are still losers, so it's time to put them in their place and speak out.

Conservatives exhibit a cultish vibe in their interactions. They refuse to listen to outside perspectives and are unwilling to learn.

It's time to stop coddling those who won't get the vaccine. They're afraid, not hesitant or skeptical. No more sugarcoating. They're scared of the vaccine, being wrong, following rules, and needles. Except for those with medical issues, we must stop coddling these individuals and call them what they are: snowflakes, cowards, idiots, losers, and most importantly, afraid.

At the core of the left, at the core of a liberal, is someone that would use the sword if they had it. They are very violent people at their core. They always have it. They can't debate. They can't have conversation. So they'll resort to these tactics. They're gonna do everything they possibly can to try to murder this movement because they can't beat us. So they're gonna try to take weapons. And now we're very aware of that. I'm aware of it. We have to have full time security. This is not a joke. This is who these people are.

My name is John. I have practically no online presence. And the reason for that is because I am scared to post things that I believe or really care about because I worry about what people think of me. I am worried about missing out on opportunities because of an online footprint. Yesterday, a man died, presumably because he believed the same things that I believe in. I am a conservative and more importantly, I'm a Christian. I believe wholeheartedly that Jesus Christ is my Lord and Savior, that he died from our sins and rose again, and that he is God. I know that in the grand scheme of things, I don't really matter. No one knows or cares who I am. But if there's one person who sees this and gains the courage to speak up themselves, that's why I'm making this.

I'm genuinely happy that the left is collectively embracing bullying again, especially after the right has revealed their true nature. Personally, I excel at bullying. It's an area where I thrive and feel most alive. For a long time, I've had to suppress this part of myself because, as children, we're taught that bullying is wrong, and it is. However, we're living in unprecedented times that call for a different approach.

I'm confronting you for disrespecting my credentials and spreading hate in the name of religion. Get out of here. This is a hate crime. Take off your mask and own up to your past. Stop glorifying violence. What do you have to say about the events of October 7th? Go back to where you came from.

We deserve to be spit on and crucified. If they hated Jesus, they'll hate you too. Why does the name of Jesus or Yeshua offend you so much? He died for your sins. Which one of you would die for one another? Silence indicates selfishness. Some claim they would die for another. We take our lives in our hands coming down to you. We love you and bring a message of love. What happens to the kids that spit on us?

How long will it take for everyone to realize that if we stand together and firmly reject the current situation, things would change? We know the truth. We recognize the agenda and the betrayal being carried out. If we collectively stood our ground, it would be over. Those in power are cowards.

Speaker 0: I’m a little pissed at the New York Times, honestly. But since you’re listening, I believe in your mission. When you write a technically completely illiterate article, you lose a lot of credibility if people are technical. That article about us being a surveillance thing is like where it’s all implied, what we do. The problem is you lose credibility with anyone who goes on the thing. That’s damaging for our democracy. Speaker 1: ask you this. And I’ll Speaker 0: look left and right. One thing I would say to people in the audience: you know you’re a lot of you think I’m right. And you know your spouse, your relative, your child, the person at work would be horrified if they knew it. You better speak up, because everyone who thinks I’m a ridiculous fascist, they’re speaking up. They write about it every day. If you do not speak up, the people who are disagreeing with me or think I’m stupid a lot, I disagree with myself. So, you have to speak up. And you cannot blame the far left, far right idiots. When they speak up for their views, do you speak up for your views? Where? Do you tell your colleague, I bet you at The New York Times a lot of people read that article about us and were ashamed. Did you go to your editor and say, how can you write something that’s technically illiterate? The guy might be a fascist, but this is technically illiterate. Okay. Speaker 1: Let me ask you different question. Speaker 0: Did you or didn’t you? Because I’m the only one speaking up. You’re gonna get a world of technical illiteracy on the right, on the left, and in the middle. Speaker 1: Alex, help me with this. A lot of Speaker 0: people

Speaker 0: At some point, many people will hate you for what you've done. Despite preaching inclusivity, they won't include you. The majority still holds power, and we allow it because we take sides in arguments. No one will understand our perspective.

When near vipers, you'll hear them scream. Hornets attack if you question the narrative. Online, being Caucasian is criticized. Diversity in ads is pushed, while social justice is used to control. NPCs can't see the truth. The techno pharisees silence dissent. Hollywood and the music industry manipulate. Ignorance is bliss in the hive mind.

Speaker 0 describes a situation where some individuals “gum felt empowered and emboldened enough to put this picture of me up to try to threaten and intimidate me,” adding that they didn’t succeed because “I signed up for this.” The person who posted the picture “said a bunch of terrible things, not just against me, but against a lot of groups and individuals who, by the way, was arrested today in Wisconsin.” The speaker’s point is that if this person feels empowered or safe enough to threaten them, what would they do to “a kid” or “a Jewish family walking down the street?” The speaker attributes this behavior to the “normalization of this,” describing how people watch such acts on television and feel empowered to imitate them. They argue that while the aggressor may think they can act, they cannot: “a, you can't.” They extend the concern to someone in law enforcement, asking, “if you think you can do it to somebody that's in law enforcement, again, what are you gonna do in an alley or in a street to a Jewish family or a kid walking down the street?” The message is a firm prohibition: “We say no. We're drawing the line.”

I refuse to change who I am and pretend to be someone I'm not just to please others. It's a common fear that drives people to do whatever others want, but those people don't truly care about you and will forget about you anyway. Trying to please everyone will only result in pleasing no one. The power lies in being true to oneself and speaking the truth, while those who let others dictate their actions lack power.

Many people are afraid to admit their mistakes and revise their opinions due to fear of backlash. Despite knowing they are wrong, they stay silent or continue on the same path. They feel protected in a large group, like a mafia, believing nobody can penetrate their team. However, the truth will eventually come out about the large-scale gain-of-function experiment on the human population, which will be remembered for generations.

It's an ongoing battle, but on good days, we find the courage to fight for the best in us. White supremacy is the biggest terrorist threat to our country.