TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

I am honored to be here with 7 brave citizens launching a European citizens initiative against the globalist agenda. We reject the unelected power of organizations like WHO, controlled by billionaires, and demand that democratically elected governments maintain authority. We will expose any government or parliament member who disregards democracy. Elections are coming, and the people deserve to know who is responsible for undermining democracy. We are millions worldwide, and we will fight until we bring down those who oppose us. Brace yourselves, the fight is on. Let's commence.

A speaker asserts that a dangerous subversive elite has infiltrated the highest levels of Western institutions and governments to implement the criminal plan of Agenda 2030. In many self-proclaimed democratic states, devices denounced in this global coup are being silenced through censorship, intimidation, psychiatricisation and even arrest. Among the victims of the totalitarian regime quietly establishing itself in Europe, Canada, Australia and other vassal nations of the United Nations, NATO, World Health Organization and World Economic Forum, all private entities founded by the same powers is lawyer Reiner Fulmisch, unjustly imprisoned and still awaiting a fair trial. His crime is having dared to speak the truth in a world of criminal lives. The speaker calls on Catholics and all people of goodwill to raise their voices in defence of those persecuted by the globalist regime. The speaker further states that it is not attorney Fulmish who should be imprisoned, but those who committed the greatest crime ever against humanity: Anthony Fauci, Bill Gates, Clough Schwab, George Soros, Ursula von der Leyen, Albert Berva and all their accomplices and emissaries, especially those in institutional positions. The message ends with a call to Free Reinerfuhlmisch.

Emails have surfaced between Jack Smith and Merrick Garland, where it turns out they were planning trials like Stalin ran or the Maxi trials in Italy where they tried 250 mafia figures together. They're gonna try a thousand of us altogether in a stadium on camera and send us off to be liquidated. It was crazy what they had. And the emails, they were already planning it. They had no expectation of losing this last November. They found this in the bag. On the bright side, what I found is that it's very easy to figure out what they did because whatever they're accusing you of doing, that's what they were actually working on. That's how they became experts on all of it. So it really makes it easy to put together their rap sheets in that context. Leticia James is just one blaring example of that mindset here. So where do you think this is all headed right now then? So, how do you think it's gonna roll out? And who's domino number three? I think that we are have to I've I'm an outsider. I don't know any more than the next monkey, but what I would do is we have to, at a geopolitical level, mission one and two have to overthrow the governments of Venezuela and Cuba. None of them can survive. This was an act of war that was successful. They overthrew our republic. This was successful. It's a freaking miracle. We were never supposed to get out from under that. They cannot survive. This was a six act of war that eliminated our country. So that's and domestic have to, this all has to be exposed. We've got to this all has to be exposed. And all the parts of society, we need to have almost like a truth and reconciliation where a lot of people who took part in what was basically a Bolshevik revolution have to be exposed. And there there are people you know, there's a 120 federal officers from the CIA and the FBI who went out to Stanford, joined the Stanford Internet Observatory, and took part in a mass censorship industrial complex against the American people. In which case all kinds of medical information was suppressed, which got people killed as well as they supported this political coup. I don't think it's a coincidence that that happened just when it did. And they suppressed any information about the elections. Those people took part in a coup. The professors who took part in it, in a way with pleading, we're just idiotic professors who read too many Herbert Marcuse underlined it too. The people who swore an oath to the constitution at some point in their life and took part in that, I believe should be hung from the Golden Gate in full daylight, left to sunset, and then their bodies disposed at sea so that American soil isn't polluted by the corpse corpses of people who took part in such a program. That was the overthrow of The United States Of America, and there were people who swore an oath to the constitution who took part in it. And that's what really should If I were the president, probably, I would let all that machinery grind on. And at the last moment, I'd probably sign and send them to some island in Hawaii for five years and say, everyone just cool this hell off. We're all just gonna cool off. You guys betrayed the country by all rights. You should be hung. But what we're gonna do is send you this we're gonna take over some resort in Oahu at the tip of wire. We'll just send you there for, like, five years. Everybody shut up. Stay off social media. Be nicer? The Point Barrel, Alaska, I was thinking would be a little bit more appropriate, but that's alright. I mean on top of Island 2. Aleutian Island. Yeah. And just say we don't wanna hear from you for five years. You're gonna be well fed, take care of. Your tennis game's gonna be great. It's not gonna be, you know, it's gonna be prison cells. You can live like a college dorm. But, literally, the US should send them off for, like, four or five years just and not hear from them. They overthrew our country. And that's probably what really should I think should that or some kind of peace and reconciliation, but everything has to be exposed. Think of all the institutions from all these things that they used to throw in our face become our weapons. The idea that 60 judges looked at this and didn't see anything becomes our point, not their point. How corrupt is the system? Now once it's all proven and exposed to them, how corrupt is the system? 60 judges looked at this and saw nothing. That's how corrupt and weak and ineffective the system is. So all these points become points in our favor.

USAID is allegedly influencing judicial systems globally, aiming for "pacification" and "stability." In Poland, there are claims that USAID and corrupted prosecutors are working to suppress populism by targeting political opponents. A Google search for "USAID" and "judicial reform" reveals numerous countries where the organization is purportedly involved in influencing judiciaries, including Serbia, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Uzbekistan, Albania, El Salvador, Ukraine, Central America, and Georgia. This influence extends to judges, courts, legal systems, and prosecutors. The speaker suggests this has been a standard practice for 60 years and will take 50 years to untangle, facing political resistance. These networks may seek funding from other sources, such as the EU or allies in China, and pressure international organizations like the UN, NATO, and the EU to weaponize their assets.

A dangerous subversive elite has managed to infiltrate the highest levels of Western institutions and governments to implement the criminal plan of the Agenda 2,030. In many self proclaimed democratic states, devices denounced in this global coup are being silenced through censorship, intimidation, psychiatricisation and even arrest. Among the victims of the totalitarian regime quietly establishing itself in Europe, Canada, Australia and other vassal nations of the United Nations, NATO, World Health Organization and World Economic Forum, all private entities founded by the same powers is lawyer Reiner Fulmisch, unjustly imprisoned and still awaiting for a fair trial. His crime is having dared to speak the truth in a world of criminal lives. I call on Catholics and all people of goodwill to raise their voices in defence of those persecuted by the globalist regime. It is not attorney Fulmish who should be imprisoned, but those who committed the greatest crime ever against humanity: Anthony Fauci, Bill Gates, Clough Schwab, George Soros, Ursula von der Leyen, Albert Berva and all their accomplices and emissaries, especially those in institutional positions. Free reinerfuhlmisch.

The House and Senate Judiciary Committees should hold intellectual hearings to argue that the founding fathers never wanted radical judges interposing themselves between elected officials and their own views. The committees should also bring in the "weirdest" judges to explain under oath the constitutional basis for their decisions. Congress should consider impeaching judges or abolishing their courts, and also consider dramatically cutting the judicial system's budget. According to Hamilton, courts cannot win a fight with the legislative and executive branches because those branches control the money and power. A recent poll from America's New Majority Project found that 81% of Americans believe the federal government is corrupt. The House and Senate have an obligation to interrogate judges, understand constitutional boundaries, look at historic precedent, and abolish courts or cease paying for them if necessary. The current situation is a direct threat to American self-government.

Today in The Netherlands, outside the Court of Appeal in Amsterdam, a landmark case brings senior government officials, major media figures, pharmaceutical leadership, and global policy actors together as defendants in a single COVID response case. Among those ordered to appear are Albert Baller, the CEO of Pfizer, the former Dutch prime minister, senior Dutch health ministers, leading figures from the Dutch media, and Bill Gates. This makes the case extraordinary. On March 9, an important step is happening at the Amsterdam Court of Appeal. This hearing is not the main trial. The main trial is proceeding, and Bill Gates, if not appearing in person, must have representation and offer a defense. Today’s hearing concerns a procedural question: should the court allow an appeal against an earlier decision that blocked a request for preliminary evidence? In simple terms, the claimants ask the court for permission to present and examine expert evidence early before the trial, to have experts testify, documents examined, and key scientific and legal claims tested through cross examination. The lower court refused that request. The Amsterdam Court Of Appeal is being asked to decide whether that refusal should itself be reviewed. This hinges on the right to have evidence examined in public. If the appeal is allowed, expert testimony and scrutiny of the evidence could proceed; if refused, the claimants must continue without that preliminary examination. The reason for this hearing traces to the main lawsuit, begun in July 2023. Seven Dutch citizens filed a civil case in a district court, claiming they were misled about the nature of the COVID threat and about the safety and necessity of COVID vaccines. They argue that government officials, public health authorities, pharmaceutical executives, and major media figures promoted a narrative that induced fear and compliance based on unscientific claims of a novel pathogen called COVID nineteen. They claim these representations caused them to take vaccines and to suffer psychological and physical harm. The claimants describe a tort claim: the defendants breached a duty of care owed to the public by providing false or misleading information that resulted in damage. They seek two things: a declaration that the defendants acted unlawfully and compensation for the harm. Before the trial proceeds, the claimants asked for the evidence behind those claims to be examined in court, hence the provisional evidence request and today’s appeal. Central to the request are expert witnesses from multiple disciplines addressing scientific, legal, psychological, and institutional dimensions. The experts include Catherine Watt (legal researcher in public health law), Sasha Latipova (pharmaceutical regulatory processes), Doctor Joseph Sansone (psychologist studying crisis messaging and behavioral compliance), Catherine Austin Fitz (financial analyst on institutional power structures and global policy networks), and Doctor Mike Yeadon (English pharmacologist, former Pfizer VP). Yeadon has argued that the safety narrative surrounding the vaccines is challenged, claiming inadequate testing and concerns about toxicity. The point of a court is that such claims should be tested under cross examination, not dismissed without scrutiny. Allowing this appeal would enable the evidence to be heard and tested in public, with broader implications beyond the Netherlands, potentially influencing accountability, transparency, and public trust in other jurisdictions. What happens here may influence debates about open scrutiny of evidence in courts elsewhere. The speaker closes with a personal note, recalling six years spent fighting misinformation and supporting the truth be told campaign for COVID jabbed, injured, and bereaved, and underscoring that this case concerns justice in action, public scrutiny, and accountability for powerful institutions.

The speaker asserts that a dangerous subversive elite has infiltrated the highest levels of Western institutions and governments to implement the criminal plan of Agenda 2,030. In many self-proclaimed democratic states, devices denounced in this global coup are being silenced through censorship, intimidation, psychiatricisation and even arrest. Among the victims of the totalitarian regime quietly establishing itself in Europe, Canada, Australia and other vassal nations of the United Nations, NATO, World Health Organization and World Economic Forum, all private entities founded by the same powers is lawyer Reiner Fulmisch, unjustly imprisoned and still awaiting a fair trial. His crime is having dared to speak the truth in a world of criminal lives. I call on Catholics and all people of goodwill to raise their voices in defence of those persecuted by the globalist regime. It is not Attorney Fulmish who should be imprisoned, but those who committed the greatest crime ever against humanity: Anthony Fauci, Bill Gates, Clough Schwab, George Soros, Ursula von der Leyen, Albert Burma and all their accomplishments and emissaries, especially those in institutional positions. Free Reinhard Fulmisch!

I am honored to be here with 7 brave citizens launching a European citizens initiative against the globalist agenda. We reject the idea of granting unelected bodies like the WHO governing powers. Democratically elected governments should not be replaced by billionaire-controlled organizations. This goes against the principles of democracy and shows contempt for the people. These 7 citizens and we will not tolerate this power grab. I will expose any government, whether in a member state or elsewhere, that supports this.

An international group, including Mark and me, delivered a letter to the UN rapporteur on torture, calling for an investigation into the unlawful imprisonment and torture of Dr. Reiner Fumich in Germany. He has been held for over a year, mostly in solitary confinement, which is effectively torture. This situation must end, and Fumich's imprisonment needs to be investigated. He played a crucial role in exposing COVID-related crimes, and his work has made some powerful entities fearful. If the courts want to maintain credibility, they must adhere to the law. Fumich is a leading figure in class action lawsuits and has gathered significant expert testimony, concluding that a false PCR pandemic was used to justify abuses against citizens. His findings have been validated by recent reports.

Yesterday, at the Department of Justice, I spent several hours reading the unredacted files and the absolutely horrific and depraved messages exchanged among rich and powerful people across every sphere of influence. These individuals sit at the top of governments, academic institutions, giant corporations, and hold positions such as cabinet secretaries. The messages show they absolutely believed they were above the law, above morals, and immune to societal norms. They joked in these emails about pedophiles, about horrific sexual acts with young girls, and about creating spaces—entire islands even—where they could do anything they wanted and get away with it because of their wealth, power, and connections. This was a massive global sex trafficking ring with thousands of victims that we know of and thousands more that we probably don't. So when the DOJ says that there is nothing to investigate, we, the American people, must rise up. We must allow the courage and determination of the survivors who have spoken out at great risk to themselves to push us to never give up until every single one of these predators and pedophiles and predator protectors is brought to justice. It is the voices of the survivors ringing through in the darkness of all of this horror that has gotten us this far. And in speaking to so many of them myself, I know that this effort is not just for them. They're not doing this just for them. They're doing it for their girls, for their children, for other people who have been affected, to all the survivors of sexual assault everywhere across the world who are watching to see if we can get accountability right here in The United States Of America. Many rich and powerful people thought over the decades that they got away with this. They definitely did. You can see it in the emails. But as Lauren said to me the other day, the earth is shaking because every single one of them now is becoming known. And around the world, princes, ambassadors, even prime ministers are being brought down for their participation in this global sex trafficking ring.

Vivian and I, along with a group of international lawyers, conducted a grand jury investigation outside the corrupt European system. We cannot trust the courts here as they have been infiltrated by the other side, including the ICC and the European Court of Human Rights. We have evidence that 25% of the judges in these courts have been paid for by George Soros and Bill Gates. Our goal is to expose the truth and empower people to take action. If their judiciaries fail, we should create our own. This is already happening in parts of the United States.

The speakers discuss Geneva as a place of beauty and peace that also harbors a dark side. The first speaker asserts that “everything evil in the world related to demo side unfortunately comes from Geneva,” naming organizations such as WHO, Gavi, the World Economic Forum (WEF), Big Pharma, and Big Tech, including Bill Gates. They claim the WEF has diplomatic immunity and declare, as a Swiss citizen, that it is no longer eligible for such immunity and call on Swiss authorities to arrest those individuals. They allege that these groups advocated a “global humanity injection” of nanolipids via a bioweapon to 5,700,000,000 people, and state that Switzerland is hosting them. They frame themselves as a victim, saying they and their mother are dying from this, describe it as a “demo side,” and vow that it will be corrected in the name of humanity. They urge a stand against what they describe as poison being injected into humanity. The second speaker responds by noting a “Geneva Swiss Syndrome” and a broader “UN syndrome,” describing fear around what is happening and claiming the United Nations is occupied; those who understand keep quiet or speak indirectly to awaken others. They say it would have been easy to carve a world government without a populace that asserts “we the people is more important,” and describe a global movement they are trying to build that is “we the people” and highly global. They argue that what is happening in Geneva is the opposite: no right for the WHO to dictate globally, and that Gavi has “total immunity” from the Swiss government, with this immunity being verifiable in the Swiss admin database. They call this a coup d’etat and a global crime scene, presenting pieces of evidence with humility, stressing that science invites doubt as a healthy attitude. The first speaker reiterates optimism for Geneva’s future, insisting that Swiss neutrality must be restored and that the young people who survive will be guarantors that such institutions never regain footholds in Switzerland. They describe a “snakehead” in Geneva as a direct, present danger to the Swiss population but say it is being cut off. They compare the situation to a house of cards—criminal in nature—and suggest justice can cause the collapse. They urge everyone, including those who have been vaccinated, to stand up and say they will not comply, ending with a call in French to honor humanity and dispel darkness.

I am honored to be here with seven brave citizens launching an initiative for the European citizens initiative. We hope the EU commission accepts it, although I'm not holding my breath. These citizens stand against attempts by globalist misanthropists to strip us of freedom, democracy, and the rule of law. They say no to granting unelected bodies governing powers. They believe that organizations like the WHO, controlled by billionaires, should not replace democratically elected governments. We will expose anyone who disrespects the people and democracy. Elections are coming, and people want to know who is responsible for the abolition of democracy. We are here to fight and will not tire until we bring them down.

Everything evil related to genocide comes from Geneva. The World Health Organization (WHO), Gavi, and the World Economic Forum (WEF) are all responsible. The WEF, which my father cofounded but left in the early eighties, has diplomatic immunity. I declare that the WEF should not have diplomatic immunity anymore and urge Swiss authorities to arrest them. The WHO, Gavi, Big Pharma, Big Tech, and Bill Gates advocate for injecting a bioweapon into 5.7 billion people. As a Swiss citizen, I am a victim of this and so is my mother. It's genocide, and justice will prevail. We, the masses, must stand up and say no to the poison being injected into humanity. We are the guardians of humanity, and our light will overcome the darkness of evil.

We need to stop this because there are more levels to it than we currently understand. These so-called "globalists" rely on censorship and secrecy because their power depends on people not knowing what they're doing with their money. If Americans truly understood how our money is being used to set up a separate government that ignores the needs of real people, we would be outraged. These individuals have essentially created their own government within ours, using NGOs and operating with different rules and vocabulary. The goal of this interview is to make the public aware that this separate government exists and is funded with our money.

I am honored to be here with 7 brave citizens launching a European citizens initiative against the globalist agenda. We reject the unelected WHO's attempt to govern us and strip away our freedom and democracy. Governments should be elected by the people, not controlled by billionaires. We will expose anyone who disrespects democracy and the people. Elections are coming, and we will hold those responsible for undermining democracy accountable. We are millions around the world, and we will fight until we bring down the globalists. Brace yourselves, the fight is on.

We at Governance and Nations in Action have conducted extensive research on election integrity. Recent events have revealed orchestrated election theft in America, involving individuals uploading software to manipulate results. This information has been documented in an affidavit presented in a federal court in Italy. Foreign interference in the election has been confirmed, and those involved must face prosecution. Italy did it, and the truth is coming to light.

For years, I've exposed the nexus between US government agencies, NGOs, and private entities, revealing their influence on censorship, regime change, and other unconstitutional actions. Recent revelations about USAID's activities have validated my work, sparking a national conversation. This isn't a moment for celebration, but reflection. We're performing open-heart surgery on the American empire, a necessary but risky undertaking. The goal isn't to eliminate US soft power, but to reform it. The system's corruption has reached alarming levels, affecting both foreign and domestic affairs. We need a new vision for foreign policy, one that prioritizes transparency and serves genuine US interests, not just the short-term gains of corporations or ideological excesses. The fight to reform this is just beginning.

An unelected body like WHO, controlled by multibillionaires, should never act in place of a democratically elected government. Any government that supports WHO's power grab is anti-democratic and shows contempt for the people. The speaker vows to expose and name anyone who disrespects democracy, including government officials and parliament members. Elections are coming up, and the people deserve to know who is responsible for abolishing democracy. The speaker, along with seven brave citizens and millions around the world, will fight against WHO every step of the way. They are the majority, and WHO is the minority. They will bring WHO down and won't stop until they succeed. The fight is on.

Every country faces challenges to the rule of law. The choices we make matter for our own country and our neighbors. Thriving countries have transparent institutions where citizens' voices are heard and the court system is fair. Corruption is like a cancer that erodes faith in democracy, weakens a nation, and acts as a form of tyranny. When politicians can be bought, courts manipulated, and media used for propaganda, society becomes susceptible to manipulation and loses control of its own destiny.

I am honored to be here with 7 brave citizens launching a European citizens initiative against the globalist agenda. We reject the unelected power of organizations like WHO, controlled by billionaires, and demand that democratically elected governments govern. Any government supporting this power grab shows contempt for the people. We will expose those who disrespect democracy and the upcoming elections will hold them accountable. We are millions worldwide fighting against this minority. Brace yourselves, the fight is on. Let's commence.

I am revealing the existence of a shadow government controlled by powerful individuals, including Bill Gates, manipulating world governments. They fund military interventions and control US government decisions. The shadow government decided Trump would not be president again. They influenced the 2020 election. I have data banks exposing their actions. Zuckerberg does not own Facebook; the US government does. I urge people to believe and act for the good of humanity.

Speaker describes ongoing experiences challenging corona mandates in Switzerland: leading court proceedings as a Swiss lawyer against unconstitutional mandates, representing individuals seeking compensation for injuries from mRNA injections, and initiating a major criminal court proceeding against Swissmedic, the Swiss medical safety agency. Despite over three years of hard work, results regarding justice remain unseen. From these efforts, the speaker identifies a lesson: in Europe, in all involved courts and health authorities, they protect their governments with deceptive information policies, wrong decision making, and, most of all, with totally illegal authorizations of mRNA products granted in Switzerland by safety agencies. The speaker notes that no justice has been done and no lesson learned in the official European world. The speaker then asks what can be done about this and first seeks input from the MAHA team and Doctor Robert Malone about any hope from the United States, where positive signals have emerged, notably on January 20 with the present president Trump’s declaration to exit the WHO and other steps. From today’s event, the speaker derives hope, but contends that the hope must come from Europe. A plan is articulated: Europe will take its destiny into its own hands. The speaker intends to ensure that people can see the true effects of the WHO and the true effects of the industry after many proceedings have resulted in authorities claiming that the WHO was setting Gold standards. The speaker aims to contribute, together with the MEHA movement, all of their experience and investigations conducted against the WHO, and to work together to make Europe healthy again. The commitment is clear: they will never give up.

Suzanne provided an overview of the Beyond the Ballot project and the broader Defending Democratic Institutions framework, focusing on how disinformation and information operations threaten public confidence in our courts and justice system. She emphasized that while Russia is the most aggressive actor in this space, other countries and domestic voices are increasingly involved, with Russia amplifying domestic narratives. The core insight is that these information operations exploit preexisting divisions and genuine grievances, rather than creating entirely new ones, and their aim is to undermine trust in democratic institutions, including the judiciary. Key evidence and framing from her three-year inquiry is summarized as follows: - Russia’s information operations target democracy and its institutions, including the justice system, and other countries imitate Kremlin tactics. Domestic voices are also engaged, and Russia amplifies those efforts. - These operations exploit weaknesses in our own system. They lean into legitimate grievances and seek to undermine perceived integrity, impartiality, and independence of the courts; they portray the judiciary as biased or corrupt or as a tool of elites. - The attack is not limited to elections but is a year-round threat to democratic legitimacy, including the justice system, and is aimed at weakening public trust in outcomes and processes. - Historical context includes the 2016 election, where propaganda, hack-and-leak activity, and attempts to disrupt voter data integrity were observed. Suzanne describes how such activity can extend to the justice system through hacking, leaking of judicial materials, or social media campaigns that manipulate perceptions of court legitimacy. - A notable case example is Twin Falls, Idaho (2016), where social media misinformation about refugees led to public outcry before facts were clarified. Fake accounts created by the Internet Research Agency in Russia pushed narratives that the justice system was failing, targeting prosecutors, judges, and politicians. - Russia uses three channels: social media, state-sponsored media (RT, Sputnik), and official statements by Russian officials. Narratives commonly assert that the justice system is broken, tolerates crime by immigrants, is biased, serves corrupt interests, or is controlled by a political elite. - Narratives are designed to erode confidence in the independence and impartiality of the judiciary and to frame reforms as evidence of systemic collapse. Examples include RT’s coverage and other propaganda aimed at inflaming racial and political tensions. - The campaign also leverages issues around race and policing, featuring fake affinity groups that appear to support opposing sides to inflame tensions and further undermine trust in institutions. - The FBI has warned that the threat extends beyond elections to a broader assault on democracy, with a focus on information operations aimed at all democratic institutions. Concretely, the project’s ongoing work includes: researching adversary threats to democratic institutions; defending the justice system through public awareness; conducting workshops and training for state and federal courts on cybersecurity and disinformation; building a rapid response and education network with legal organizations; and civic education as a national security imperative. The objective is to rebuild public resilience against pernicious messaging, encourage informed citizen participation, and motivate the public to hold institutions accountable while accepting legitimate outcomes. In response to questions, Suzanne underscored that members of the bar have a vital role: they can educate communities, correct disinformation related to specific cases (which judges cannot easily address), and engage in close contact with courts to safeguard democratic legitimacy. She urged lawyers nationwide to be more engaged in educating the public about the justice system and the mechanisms to hold it accountable.