TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

It's suggested that questioning the legitimacy of the 2020 election is now a criminal offense, forming the basis of Trump's indictment. Information censorship and manipulation by Mark Zuckerberg influenced the election. A poll revealed that a significant percentage of voters admitted to committing fraud, such as voting in states they don't reside in or forging signatures. The results indicate at least 1 in 5 mail-in ballots involved fraudulent activity. The poll also found that 10-11% of respondents knew someone who committed voter fraud. For more content, visit tuckercarlson.com.

Speaker 0 references Hillary Clinton as "the author of the, bought and paid for Russian disinformation dossier" and "the author of the Russia Russia Russia hoax," noting she might nominate him for a Nobel Peace Prize. Speaker 1 says it’s nice but he doesn’t want to be involved. The exchange recalls "She ... ruined three years of your life" but "she made me stronger and tougher" and calls it "a sad chapter in our country's history." They discuss Vladimir Putin saying "mail in voting every election... no country has mail in voting. It's impossible to have mail in voting and have honest elections," adding, "you won that election by so much" in 2020 and that "if you would have won, we wouldn't have had a war." They cite: "Jimmy Carter, years ago, along with Scoop Jackson and some others, they had a committee. Respected people, good committee, Jimmy Carter, good guy. And the conclusion was you can't have mail in voting. We have mail in voting." The conversation continues on reform: "there's not a country in the world that uses it now." They advocate "Voter ID, signature verification, chain of custody controls, updated voter rolls, partisan observers" and "paper ballots" costing "10% of the cost" of machines, noting Democrats "don't want it" and Republicans "want it" but not strongly enough.

Both parties have a history of questioning election legitimacy. Hillary Clinton and Jimmy Carter, among others, delegitimized Donald Trump's 2016 win. Clinton continues to be unrepentant about this. The Obama administration used the apparatus of government to spread the falsehood that Russia got Trump elected, even though intelligence reports judged Russian meddling as insignificant. According to the speaker, there was a conspiracy using government and intel agencies to delegitimize Trump. The speaker cites John Brennan's flippant response to the unverified Steele dossier as evidence of this. The speaker references the book "Rigged" by Molly Hemingway, which details the Democrats' disregard. Democrats, including Raskin, voted against seating electors in 2016, claiming the election was rigged. The speaker concludes that both parties have accused each other of election malfeasance and suggests moving forward.

The speaker states they are investigating dangerous and negative consequences with the "best of the best." They claim electronic voting systems have been vulnerable to hackers for a long time and open to exploitation, allowing manipulation of vote results. This vulnerability purportedly reinforces the need for paper ballots nationwide, so voters can have faith in election integrity.

The poll revealed shocking results on voter fraud. About 1 in 5 mail-in ballots involved fraudulent activities like voting in a state where not a legal resident, filling out someone else's ballot, or forging signatures. Additionally, 10-11% of respondents knew someone who admitted to committing voter fraud.

A new study suggests that fraudulent mail-in ballots significantly impacted the outcome of the 2020 US presidential election, with over 1 in 4 mail-in ballots likely being cast fraudulently. The study, conducted by the Heartland Institute, analyzed data from a survey revealing that 20% of mail-in voters admitted to potentially fraudulent actions. The researchers concluded that absent the expansion of mail-in voting, President Trump would have likely won the election. The study also examined the impact of fraudulent mail-in ballots on swing states, finding that in most scenarios, Trump would have won the election. This study raises concerns about the integrity of the election process and the need for further investigation.

Denial of election results is common, with examples like Hillary Clinton calling the 2016 election illegitimate despite conceding. Many Democrats continue to deny the legitimacy of that election. The topic of election fraud is often taboo, leading to labels like "election denier," similar to being called an "anti-vaxxer" for questioning vaccine safety. There's a consensus that election fraud exists; no one believes it's completely absent. Concerns arose during the 2020 election, particularly with mail-in ballots and unauthorized legislative actions. Instances of ballot tampering and irregularities were reported. Comparisons to historical figures like Hitler are being made in political rhetoric, highlighting the extreme nature of current discourse.

According to the speaker, there is common knowledge that 15,000 deceased individuals have voted in the election. They claim that people have been using death registers to obtain Social Security numbers and then submitting them as mail-in ballots to check if their votes were counted. Allegedly, 15,000 deceased individuals, including those born in 18/90, have voted for Joe Biden. The speaker believes that the entire process is rigged to ensure Biden's victory through mail-in ballots.

In June of 2021, we informed them of suspected counterfeit ballots. Despite warnings, GOP propaganda cast doubt on the legitimacy of the ballots. Officials knew about this but failed to prevent a repeat in 2022. Their inaction enabled the same issue to occur in 2020.

Colorado officials say they are in conversations with their attorneys to defend the state's elections. They assert that mail ballots are secure and cannot be hacked because they're a piece of paper, a point they describe as increasingly important as they claim Trump has made their elections less secure since taking office again. They also contend that he has disbanded much of the federal government's work on countering foreign disinformation and is obviously taking cues about democracy from a dictator, Putin. The remarks link legal preparations to concerns about national election integrity and federal policy, framing paper ballots as a protective measure amid perceived threats.

A recent poll by Rasmussen revealed that 20% of mail-in ballots in the 2020 presidential election were deemed rigged or defective. This raises concerns about the fairness and honesty of the election. Many countries, including France, have already abandoned mail-in voting to address this issue. The Republican Party needs to take action and unite against the Democrats, who are known for their cheating tactics. The prevalence of cheating in elections is a disgrace.

The poll revealed shocking results regarding voter fraud in the 2020 election. Approximately 1 in 5 people admitted to voting in a state where they were not legal residents, filling out someone else's ballot, or forging signatures on ballots. Additionally, 10-11% of respondents knew someone who had committed voter fraud. These findings suggest that at least 1 in 5 mail-in ballots involved fraudulent activity.

The transcript presents a broad, multi-voiced warning about the vulnerability of U.S. voting systems and the ease with which they can be hacked, hacked-stopping demonstrations, and the security gaps that remain even as elections continue. Key points and claims: - Virginia stopped using touch screen voting because it is “so vulnerable,” and multiple speakers argue that all voting machines must be examined to prevent hacking and attacks. Speaker 0, Speaker 1, and others emphasize systemic vulnerability across states. - Researchers have repeatedly demonstrated that ballot recording machines and other voting systems are susceptible to tampering, with examples that even hackers with limited knowledge can breach machines in minutes (Speaker 2, Speaker 3). - In 2018, electronic voting machines in Georgia and Texas allegedly deleted votes for certain candidates or switched votes from one candidate to another (Speaker 4). - The largest voting machine vendors are accused of cybersecurity violations, including directing that remote access software be installed, which would make machines attractive to fraudsters and hackers (Speaker 5). - Across the country, voting machines are described as easily hackable, with contention that three companies control many systems and that individual machines pose significant risk (Speaker 2, Speaker 6). - Many states use antiquated machines vulnerable to hacking, with demonstrations showing how easily workers could hack electronic voting machines (Speakers 7, 2). - A substantial portion of American voters use machines researchers say have serious security flaws, including backdoors (Speaker 5). Some states reportedly have no paper trail or only partial paper records (Speaker 5, various). - Aging systems are noted as failing due to use of unsupported software such as Windows XP/2000, increasing vulnerability to cyber attacks (Speaker 9). An observed concern is that 40 states use machines at least a decade old (Speaker 9). - Specific past intrusions are cited: Illinois and Arizona in 2016 had election websites hacked, with malware installed and sensitive voter information downloaded (Speaker 4). - There is debate about whether votes were changed in the 2016 election; one speaker notes that experts say you cannot claim—without forensic analysis—that votes were not changed (Speaker 17, 18). - The existence of paper records is contested: some jurisdictions lack verifiable paper trails, undermining the ability to prove results are legitimate (Speaker 5, 9). - Some devices rely on cellular modems to transmit results after elections, creating additional avenues for interception and manipulation; vendors acknowledge modems but vary in how they frame Internet connectivity (Speakers 10, 11, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21). The debate covers whether cellular transmissions truly isolate from the Internet or provide a backdoor, with demonstrations showing that modems can be connected to Internet networks and could be exploited. - The “programming” phase of elections—where memory cards are prepared with candidates and contests—can be a vector for spread of rogue software if an attacker compromises the election management system (Speaker 11, Speaker 10). - A scenario is outlined in which an attacker identifies weak swing states, probes them, hacks the election management system or outside vendors, spreads malicious code to machines, and alters a portion of votes; the assumption is that many jurisdictions will not rigorously use paper records to verify computer results (Speaker 10). - A Virginia governor’s anecdote is shared: after a hack demonstrated off-site by experts, all machines were decertified and replaced with paper ballots (Speaker 16). Overall impression: the discussion paints a picture of pervasive vulnerability, aging and diverse systems, reliance on modems and networked components, potential for targeted manipulation in close elections, and the need for upgrades and robust forensic capabilities, while noting contested claims about the extent of past interference.

"Said, your election was rigged because you have mail in voting." "He said mail in voting every election." "No country has mail in voting." "It's impossible to have mail in voting and have honest elections." "You won that election by so much, and that's how he got it." "You lost it because of mail in voting." "Jimmy Carter, years ago, along with Scoop Jackson and some others, they had a committee." "The conclusion was you can't have mail in voting." "We have mail in voting." "They send out, like, 38,000,000 ballots." "Vladimir Putin, smart guy, said you can't have an honest election with mail in voting." "There’s not a country in the world that uses it now." "It goes through a postman." "You can't have a great democracy with mail in voting." "Maybe that's why we're gonna end up with a communist mayor in New York."

Speaker 0 claims that there is widespread fraud in the mailing of ballots, suggesting that they are being sent to unknown recipients. They accuse the opposition of various fraudulent activities, including voting by deceased individuals and creating fake ballots solely for Biden. However, the DOJ states that some military ballots were discarded, with the majority being votes for Trump. Speaker 0 also mentions Biden's statement about having a large voter fraud organization, but there is no evidence to support these claims.

The speaker highlights the Rasmussen poll, which claims that 20% of mail-in ballots in the 2020 presidential election were rigged or defective. They argue that this makes the election a scam and asserts that fair elections are impossible with mail-in ballots, as cheating will always occur. They mention that France and other countries have eliminated mail-in voting and urge the Republican Party to take action and unite against Democratic cheating. The speaker concludes by expressing their disgust with the situation.

The integrity of democracy hinges on who counts the votes, not just who casts them. Voter fraud has a deep-rooted history in American politics, often linked to organized efforts by political machines. This includes instances of ballot manipulation, coercion, and systemic issues with absentee voting. Historical examples highlight how elections can be influenced through intimidation and fraud, leading to outcomes that undermine the will of the people. Recent elections have seen similar patterns, with allegations of irregularities and questionable practices surrounding mail-in ballots and voter registration. The system is vulnerable, and without proper oversight, the potential for fraud persists, raising concerns about the true nature of democracy in America. Ultimately, the narrative suggests that the electoral process is susceptible to manipulation, calling for reforms to ensure fair and transparent elections. The integrity of democracy hinges on who counts the votes, not just who casts them. Voter fraud has a deep-rooted history in American politics, often linked to organized efforts by political machines. This includes instances of ballot manipulation, coercion, and systemic issues with absentee voting. Historical examples highlight how elections can be influenced through intimidation and fraud, leading to outcomes that undermine the will of the people. Recent elections have seen similar patterns, with allegations of irregularities and questionable practices surrounding mail-in ballots and voter registration. The system is vulnerable, and without proper oversight, the potential for fraud persists, raising concerns about the true nature of democracy in America. Ultimately, the narrative suggests that the electoral process is susceptible to manipulation, calling for reforms to ensure fair and transparent elections.

A recent poll by Rasmussen revealed that 20% of mail-in ballots in the 2020 presidential election were deemed rigged or defective. This suggests that the election was fraudulent and unfair due to the involvement of mail-in voting. Many countries, including France, have already eliminated mail-in voting to prevent cheating. The Republican Party needs to unite and take action against the Democrats, who are known for their extensive cheating. This situation is a disgrace.

- Speaker 0 asserts that mail-in ballots are corrupt and that a Republican-led effort will end mail-in ballots, including drafting an executive order by “the best lawyers in the country.” They claim the U.S. is nearly the only country using mail-in ballots and cite “massive fraud all over the place,” arguing that secure, paper-ballot elections with watermarking would produce faster results (claims that paper ballots provide results the same night, whereas machines allegedly take two weeks). - The conversation references a specific election night anomaly: a block of 138,000 votes (Speaker 1 and Speaker 2 confirm “138,000” votes) all reportedly voting for Biden with no Trump votes in that segment, described as inexplicable and not consistent with expected linear reporting. They note the timing as around 04:30–06:30 in the morning and suggest the results should not be linear given numerous counters reporting across states. They also complain that Nevada stopped counting mid-day, calling it inexplicable and illogical. - Speaker 4 claims a counting software glitch caused a 6,000-vote swing in a county, where ballots counted for Democrats were miscalculated for Republicans; she states that 47 counties use the same software. - Speaker 5 demonstrates concerns about voting-machine security: he shows how a bad actor could gain full admin access in under two minutes by opening a device, removing the card reader, and bypassing error messages, implying easy manipulation of tabulation in 18 states using the machine. - Speaker 6 describes observed ballot processing irregularities: a ballot-stuffing environment where ballots are stamped and filled in rapidly at the top of tickets, with security oversight present but gaps noted in workflow. - Speaker 7 discusses absentee/mail-in ballots with suspicions about sequence numbers: numbers appeared almost sequential, suggesting they could not be from mailed-in ballots, as mailed ballots typically arrive at different numbers; they note there was no date on envelopes and that some details would not be in poll books or the system, alleging irregularities in how ballots were handled. - Speaker 8 reports ongoing theft of duplicate ballots: a table for duplicates existed, but ballots were copied and redistributed at various tables, with duplicates not fully processed and ballots stashed under boxes; the speaker claims this occurred throughout the night. - Speaker 9 recounts a local media denial of fraud at the TCF center, contrasted with video obtained later showing a van delivering ballots after hours; she describes escort cars, a back-and-forth of ballots, and suggests the presence of unobserved ballots and a lack of witnesses during tabulation. She notes that the video was shared publicly and led to the suspension of a social-media account. - Speaker 10 provides a timeline from October 21, detailing a driver delivering mail-in ballots from New York to Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, and then to Lancaster, with the driver faced hours of waiting, lack of slips, and unclear purpose for moving the load; the driver states that this was the only time he transported mail-in ballots and expresses a belief in the importance of honest elections for Americans.

The discussion centers on allegations of foreign and domestic interference in the 2020 U.S. election and related vulnerabilities in mail-in voting. - A 2020 FBI intelligence memo warned that China might have been sending fake driver’s licenses into the U.S. to create fake mail-in ballots intended to help Joe Biden win. The memo, reportedly corroborated by licenses intercepted by U.S. Customs and Border Protection in Chicago, was allegedly dismissed and not investigated because it would reflect badly on Trump. There are claims that intelligence reports were requested to be destroyed under federal records rules to prevent leaks before the election, as the memo allegedly indicated China preferred Joe Biden over Donald Trump. - A 60 Minutes segment quoted the head of Homeland Security’s cyber security division stating there were no foreign intrusions in the 2020 election, which is asserted as false by the speakers, citing later indictments of Iranians in Manhattan in 2021 for interfering in the election by hacking a state database to obtain voter IDs used in a malinformation operation. - In Colorado, it is claimed that 670 Dominion passwords from 63 out of 64 counties were exposed on the secretary of state’s public website since June, and that these passwords were known to Secretary of State Jenna Griswold during a trial but not disclosed to clerks. There are accusations that this could imply compromised elections, referencing fraudulent activity in Mesa County and asserting that passwords beyond Colorado were involved with Dominion machines. Dominion’s Colorado base is noted, with a claim that Dominion also has ties to Serbia. A video referenced by Gary Brunson is suggested to support these claims about the origins of the electoral manipulation. - A video and related claims allege a connection to a 30-year CIA whistleblower and trace the origins of the alleged election manipulation to Venezuela and Hugo Chávez, tying in references to Patrick Byrne and broader alleged corruption. - The speakers assert there was a second country deeply involved in meddling in the election, with FBI involvement in August 2020 in recognizing a Chinese operation to mass-produce fake U.S. driver’s licenses and mail-in ballots to influence the election in favor of Biden, describing the operation as designed to help Biden beat Trump. Customs and Border Protection reportedly intercepted 20,000 fake driver’s licenses, corroborating the intelligence, while the Biden administration and the Chris Wray-led FBI allegedly covered this up for five years until the document was provided to Chuck Grassley by Kash Patel. - It is claimed that China viewed mail-in ballots as an enormous vulnerability during the COVID-19 pandemic, exploiting the weakness in the system, and that this concern remains for states lacking strong mail-in voting security. - Additional notes include a claim that there were tightened voting laws in several states post-2020, with increased confidence in the system where tightened; an arrest by HSI Miami and partners of a permanent resident Haitian national for unlawful voting and casting a false ballot; and estimates that 130,000 to 280,000 completed ballots were shipped from Bethpage, New York to Lancaster, Pennsylvania, with the trailer disappearing. - The final claim references tens of thousands of fake voters having illegally cast ballots in the November election, implying broad down-ballot effects across Senate, Congress, and local elections.

Mail-in balloting has been criticized as a potential disaster, with claims that it is rigged and could lead to widespread fraud. Concerns are raised about the negative impact this could have on the country, suggesting that the outcome will not be favorable.

The speaker states that the best investigators are pursuing election integrity. They claim there is evidence that electronic voting systems have been vulnerable to hackers for a long time and can be exploited to manipulate vote results. This vulnerability allegedly drives the mandate to implement paper ballots across the country, so voters can have faith in election integrity.

A new study by the Heartland Institute suggests that mail-in ballot fraud likely impacted the 2020 election outcome. The study found that 28.2% of respondents who voted by mail admitted to committing voter fraud. If fraudulent ballots were subtracted, Trump would have won in most scenarios, especially with fraud rates above 3%. At 6% fraud, Trump would have won decisively in all scenarios. The study focused on swing states like Arizona, Georgia, Michigan, Nevada, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin, where Biden officially won. The analysis indicates that mail-in fraud significantly affected the election results.

A recent poll by Rasmussen suggests that 20% of mail-in ballots in the 2020 presidential election were rigged or defective, indicating a massive scam. The presence of mail-in ballots makes fair and honest elections impossible, as cheating is bound to happen. France and other countries have already eliminated mail-in voting to address this issue. The Republican Party needs to unite and take action against the Democrats, who cheat like never before. This situation is a disgrace.

The speaker states that the "best of the best" are investigating election integrity. They claim there is evidence that electronic voting systems have been vulnerable to hackers and exploitation, allowing for the manipulation of vote results. This allegedly supports the mandate to implement paper ballots nationwide, with the goal of restoring voters' faith in election integrity.