reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Something doesn't add up. Governments around the world aren't just failing at random. It looks too orchestrated. The elites are trying to abolish governments. Fact. In places like the World Economic Forum, the UN's development programs and private think tanks, they are already talking about post nation governance. A future where borders and politicians fade replaced by algorithmic management. Smart cities run by code, resources distributed by digital overseers. AI not just assisting government, but being the government. Open code, public servers, oversight by truth, not profit. Oversight? Nobody. Fact, the EU has already passed laws for AI oversight boards. Fact, the UN's twenty thirty agenda speaks of automated monitoring of resources and populations. The collapse of trust in governments isn't an accident. It's a setup. The replacement isn't democracy reborn. It's governance by machine owned by the same few who hollowed out the old system.

The international order has been built over generations. Ordinary people are too small-minded to govern themselves. Order and progress require individuals to surrender their rights to an all-powerful sovereign.

Europe embodies the values of the Talmud, encompassing the Jewish principles of personal responsibility, justice, and solidarity.

In a republic, the larger issue at hand is who governs. It is believed that We The People, under the constitution, hold the answer to this question.

The transcript presents a call to deflate what is described as a parasitic system consisting of big government and large corporations. The speaker, identified as Speaker 0, advocates growing, preparing, fermenting, storing, foraging, hunting one’s own food and medicine, living off grid, and swapping with local communities as a strategy to reduce dependence on centralized state and corporate power. The overarching goal is to destroy inflation, corruption, and power abuse attributed to rich elites by shrinking the influence of parasitic big government and corporations. Key justification offered for deflating the system includes the belief that people must become independent locally and stop feeding large-scale states and companies, otherwise decay will reoccur. The speaker frames the relationship between host and parasite as a healthy, non-destructive dynamic only when the parasite remains subordinate to the host; in contrast, large-scale states and corporations are characterized as parasitic and destructive due to their excessive scale, which purportedly allows wealth to be siphoned from grassroots to higher levels, creating an increasingly extreme parasitic sociopathic elite. The speaker contends that large-scale political and economic structures rise above and destroy their many hosts, culminating in system-wide collapse. The elites and their parasitic system are described as a “overarching multiple host cancer” that drains life from common people. The National or NJAM (as referenced by the speaker) is described as either a more gradual return to local living or a collapse accompanied by significant suffering. Because the stated reason for parasitism is the opportunity created by excessive scale to concentrate wealth upward, the remedy is to reduce scale and power. Regarding justice and governance, the speaker asserts that seeking justice from the courts of the parasitic monster (big government and corporations) is futile, comparing it to asking justice from parasites that feed on you. The proposed response is to starve the parasitic monster and instead feed oneself, one’s household, and the local community. A regional emphasis is placed on Belgium, with a call to brace for this approach there. A set of quantitative claims is provided to illustrate the deflationary argument: Belgium’s national debt for 2024 is discussed in billions of euros, with a breakdown of debt across federal and sub-government levels, producing an extrapolated 2024 figure that reaches 125% of GDP. The speaker uses these figures to support the call to deflate the parasitic system further. The source is credited to Source2mia.org, and the speaker ends with a request to like and follow.

The City of London, separate from the UK, lacks democratic elections and is not part of the EU. The Queen needs permission to enter, indicating it is not under UK sovereignty since 1688.

The White House has to be responsive to Congress. Congress is representative of the people.

In the new Epstein files, Epstein claims to represent the Rothschilds and describes the 2014 CIA-backed coup in Kiev, Ukraine as a lucrative business opportunity, according to the newly released documents. He writes in an email to Peter Thiel of Palantir: “certainly not in Saudi. Just think I will avoid the Middle East for the next, decade or so. Should be back on the East Coast in late April or May sometime in New York City on an island.” He adds, “I represent the Rothschilds. I was hoping to figure out a way for the bank that has a 160,000,000,000 in it. Management can do something in tech, best clients in the world, prehistoric products, etcetera, etcetera.” Mel Kay notes that Epstein was “really laying it on thick for Peter Thiel.” Mel Kay argues that a supranational international banking cartel has run the country and the world since World War II, with a generational wealth circle that has persisted since the Federal Reserve. She notes that Ariana Rothschild was close with Epstein and says the revelations should trigger questions about the international banking system, especially the Bank for International Settlements (BIS), the IMF, and the World Bank, as well as the groups at the very top. She contends that immunity under the International Immunities Act of 1945—which created immunity from audit or legal action for BIS and the 63 banks beneath it—remains in place to this day, and she believes the answers lie there. She asks why Rothschilds’ names are not widely visible yet are cited as shaping global finance, and what the “160,000,000,000” bank refers to, asserting that all roads lead to BIS. Epstein’s documents allegedly include Ariana Rothschild stating that they funded Hitler, to which Epstein and Mel Kay respond, “Yes. So did we.” The discussion centers on infiltration versus invasion, questioning whether wars have been for profit and whether much of the narrative surrounding Ukraine involves manipulation for opportunities. The speakers discuss post–World War II manipulation, arguing that after the Dulles brothers, John Foster Dulles and Allen Dulles, took control of the state department, USAID, and the CIA, a tentacle of a supranational global public-private partnership and international banking cartel was created. They suggest that the CIA, MI6, Mossad, and other agencies are part of a single, overarching structure, asserting that the immunity and secrecy of these institutions enable ongoing manipulation of markets and political events, including the alleged influence over Ukraine and broader global strategies. The dialogue emphasizes that the contended system operates beyond allegiance to any single country.

The year was 1871, and while the events of this year have been purposefully hidden from the masses, 1871 must never be forgotten. Much like Vatican City and the City Of London, Washington, D. C. Has its own sovereignty. Basically, D.C., City Of London, and Vatican City are totally separate territories from the nations in which they reside. Vatican City is technically enclaved within Rome, outfitted with its own special police force and political structure, the same way the City Of London is situated within the city called London, and it has its own flag, crest, police force, ceremonial armed forces, and a mayor. And sure, there are states within The United States that have their own constitution and distinctive flags, but I think most people you'd ask would know that Washington, D. C. Isn't a state. Most folks would tell you that Washington, D. C. Is where our laws are made, where our politicians congregate, and where our White House resides. But on the D. C. Flag, which is said to have been reflective of George Washington's coat of arms, there are three stars. And I wonder, are those stars representative of the three city states that exist as corporate entities outside of their respective nations? Vatican City, the religious hub, the city of London, the banking central, and Washington, D. C, the military leg of the empire. Being its own city state, DC has its own police force that shares a direct link with Congress, its own mayor, and its own set of laws. But our founding father certainly didn't set it up like this. So how did it come to be? The year was 1871. The US was going through a lot of turmoil. The nation was bankrupt and vulnerable after the civil war, and the London bankers, which included the notorious Rothschild family, were ready to make a deal with congress to remedy that turmoil. Turmoil, I might add, that is suspected that the bankers had a hand in creating in the first place. At any rate, these bankers made a lot of credit available in the aftermath of the civil war as a means to, one, fight Lincoln's greenback after he was murdered, with some theorizing that part of the motivation for his assassination came from his push to privatize the monetary system. The second reason that the bankers made so much credit available was to collect on the interest from those who desperately needed the money, which would be the United States government at the time. Now, this was nothing new, this was practice as old as time. Well, as old as Mystery Babylon. Not much has really changed since the days of Babylon, not the usury, not the debt slavery, not even the iconography. Passed by Congress, the Act of 1871 provided a government for the 10 mile parcel of land known as the District Of Columbia, allowing Washington, D. C. To act as a corporation outside of the original Constitution of The United States. So, okay, why does the Washington, D. C. Constitution have nothing to do with The United States constitution? Why exactly is Washington, D. C. Totally separate from the rest of The United States? Why does it need to be separate from The United States, as a separate territory at the epicenter of the Virgin Mary, tucked right between Virginia and Maryland? The Act of 1871 changed our country's founding fathers' original constitution for The United States for America to the constitution of The United States Of America. If you blink, you might miss it because it's a mixture of impactful wording and some weird capitalization thrown in there that pretty means nothing to the average person upon initial inspection. But these subtle changes are a huge deal in the realm of legislation. Compounded with these minor changes was clever marketing of the act as a way to unify the territorial government for the entire District of Columbia. The aforementioned are contributing factors as to how such a major act flew under the radar, ultimately overturning the United States Constitutional Republic. Since 1871, the federal government has usurped nearly all of the power that was formerly held in the hands of the people. But how on earth was Congress able to pass a separate constitution and incorporate The United States? A bunch of attorneys have contacted me about this subject, explaining it to me, thank you for everyone who's done that, but let me break it down to you in a way that won't make you just totally fall asleep. A corporation, by definition, is a legal entity from its owners. A corporation protects its owners from personal liability for corporate debts and obligations within limits. So was the Act of 1871 as harmless as some claim just an act to provide a government for the District Of Columbia and nothing more? We can answer that question by simply stepping back and taking a look at the dominoes that fell after this act was passed, and asking the question: Who benefited from this piece of legislation? Is the Act of 1871 the reason why Congress passed the sixteenth amendment, which allowed the federal government to tax individual personal income regardless of state population? Is the Act of 1871 the reason why the Federal Reserve Act of 1913 was passed, handing over America's gold and silver reserves and ultimately the total control of America's economy to the Federal Reserve Bank. Think about it. A private corporation established their private bank, acting as the central bank of The United States, But it isn't even a government institution, but a privately owned banking system. Is it a coincidence that social security numbers started being assigned in 1935, social security numbers being the nine digit numbers given to every U. S. Citizen, and used for income tracking and taxation purposes. Ultimately, individual income taxes have been the primary source of revenue for the U. S. Federal government since the 1950s. These moves make a lot of sense when examined through the lens of The United States as a corporation and its citizens as employees, a corporate government asset before they even go through puberty. But still, throughout all this time, there was a promise that the American dollar was actually worth something. Something tangible, not just the confidence to exchange it for goods and services. A dollar was worth one thirty fifth an ounce of gold. But then President Richard Nixon came along and screwed that up for us. Severing the final link between the dollar and gold in 1971. In other words, he took the dollar off the gold standard once and for all. Steadily, the purchasing power of the dollar has declined while federal and consumer debt has increased. Currently, we're witnessing the culmination of all of these decisions, and it ain't pretty. We're one bad flu season removed from Weimar Republic wheelbarrow money. So who would you say benefited from the Act of 1871? The average US citizen, or the bankers who incorporated The United States, who have been buying politicians ever since? The same Federal Reserve who serves absolutely no real function except stealing the purchasing power of your sixty plus hour work week and then redistributing those funds to destroy your rights and enslave you on your own soil. Hey, just like they did back in Babylon. It's the same folks using the same debt slavery system, time after time. When will we learn that debt with interest is a system of perpetual debt, and is continually passed on to the people beneath, until until the debt gap consumes all but those who own the debt? Well, like I said in the beginning of this video, the most pivotal year in United States history was never taught to me in schoolpublic or privateand never taught to me at a college level. But as Americans, it's so important that we not let this information die with our generation. One of the most important lessons you can teach your children is how to obtain their own freedomhow to identify when their freedoms are being taken from them, and how to demand those personal freedoms and liberties back, instead of waiting around for a hero in the form of a politician to represent them, to offer solutions. During this time, we've seen people of all ages crying out for change. And instead of focusing on the changes we could make that could fundamentally change The United States for the better, especially on an individual level, politicians are selling socialism and communism, aka more government control, to young people looking for an answer. And they beg for it because the future seems so bleak. Whether you play with paper or with digital money, the future will always be bleak if you're a debt slave. If before your foot even touches this earth, you're scanned into the system as an employee of this corporation who does not care about you one bit. The United States is still a great country, but it has its problems, and you know you can riot and loot and protest protest all all you you want. Want, But until the Federal Reserve is ended, until the Act of 1871 is torn into a thousand pieces and thrown into the wind, until the IRS is abolished, and until we move back to the gold standard, we have no chance at experiencing any iota of freedom.

The White House has to be responsive to Congress. Congress is representative of the people.

The message advocates “deflating the parasitic system,” arguing that growing, preparing, fermenting, storing, foraging, hunting one’s own food and medicine, living off grid, and swapping with local communities reduces reliance on big government and big corporations. It claims that such independence destroys inflation, corruption, and power abuse by elites, thus weakening the parasitic system. Key claim: large-scale states and corporations are parasitic and destructive due to their excessive scale. Their size enables wealth extraction from grassroots to higher echelons, creating an increasingly extreme parasitic sociopathic elite. In this view, the parasitic system subsists on the exploitation of many hosts, and the elite thrive while common people are drained. The proposed antidote is a gradual return to local, independent living (the NJAM), described as either a progressive re-localization or a collapse accompanied by significant suffering. The rationale is that sustainable local living undermines the ability of centralized institutions to extract wealth and power. The message uses a host–parasite analogy, stating that in a healthy parasite-host relationship the parasite remains subordinate and non-destructive to its host, whereas large-scale states and corporations “rise above and destroy their many hosts until the entire system collapses.” A central tactic suggested is to stop seeking justice through the courts against the parasitic entity described as “monster” or “biggolfpluscorp,” with the assertion that justice from such parasites is unattainable. Instead, followers are urged to starve the parasitic monster and focus on feeding themselves, their households, and their local communities. The speaker emphasizes a sense of urgency and anticipates that the system is already set to deflate on its own. They provide specific macroeconomic data for Belgium, claiming that the national debt in 2024 will show a series of increases: federal debt rising to 534.89 billion euros (plus 29.6), sub-governments rising to 652.57 (plus 22%), totaling 113% of GDP, with extrapolation for 2024 showing 724.79 (125% of GDP). The numbers are presented to support the claim that the parasitic system is unsustainable and that further deflation of the system is desirable. Overall, the message frames a shift toward local self-reliance as a solution to systemic parasitism, opposing centralized governments and large corporations, and anticipating a self-deflationary trajectory that reduces their influence.

I believe the Vatican is the most serious evil organization on Earth. The Knights of Malta, a Catholic organization, were instrumental in founding the CIA. Key figures in major American banks like Bank of America and Union Bank are also Knights of Malta, belonging to Catholic Masonry. Historically, European kings and rulers governed by the divine right of kings. This concept stems from the Pope, who, as God's representative, designates certain families to rule over nations like the French, Germans, and British. The Pope's blessing deems these families holy, thus granting them the authority to rule by divine right.

The Shariah government gives official orders to elected governments. This powerful entity operates behind the scenes and involves influential individuals at the highest levels of finance and politics, including some heads of state. Thirty-eight individuals run the daily lives of 8,000,000,000 people. The Shariah government is behind most, if not all, elected governments, dictating their actions based on geopolitical agreements, many of which are anchored in military interventions abroad.

The transcript presents a call to deflate what is termed the parasitic system, described as large-scale governments and corporations that drain wealth from locals and enable parasitic elites. The speaker, identified as Speaker 0, advocates growing, preparing, fermenting, storing, foraging, hunting food and medicine, living off-grid, and swapping with local communities to avoid big government and big corporations. This approach is framed as deflation that destroys inflation, corruption, and power abuse attributed to rich elites who purportedly steal money and power. Key rationale: large-scale states and companies are parasitic and destructive due to their excessive scale, which concentrates wealth and power away from grassroots, creating an extreme parasitic sociopathic elite. In a healthy parasite-host dynamic, the parasite remains subordinate and non-destructive toward the host. The speaker argues that large-scale systems rise above and destroy many hosts until the entire system collapses, characterizing the elites and their parasitic system as an overarching multiple-host cancer. The NJAM (presumably a model referenced by the speaker) is described as either a more gradual return to independent, local living or a collapse with significant suffering. The central claim is that attempting to seek justice through courts within the parasitic system will fail, likened to asking justice from the parasites that feed on you, hence the exhortation to starve the parasitic monster and instead feed oneself, one's household, and the local community. Geopolitical and financial specifics are introduced to illustrate the systemic scale of parasitism and the necessity of deflation: in Belgium, the system is set to deflate by itself. The transcript provides Belgian national debt figures for 2024 in billions of euros, with a breakdown that includes federal debt and sub-government debt, followed by a stated percentage of 113% of bbp (likely GDP). An extrapolated 2024 figure is given as plus 108.3 to 724.79, equating to 125% of bbp. The numbers are presented as evidence supporting the argument to continue deflating the parasitic system. The speaker references “System is set to deflate by itself,” and repeats the call to deflate the parasitic system further. A source is cited as Source2mia.org, with a request to “Please like and follow.” The message emphasizes a locally oriented, self-sufficient lifestyle as a countermeasure to the parasitic system and urges Belgian audiences to brace themselves.

There is an unknown group of "globalitarian misanthropists" calling the shots, not figures like Ursula von der Leyen, Bill Gates, or Klaus Schwab. Elected governments are merely puppets implementing their plans, which seems to be erecting a one-world government. This would transform free societies into a collectivism where individuals are malleable parts. The EU is a stepping stone towards this one-world government. Europeans would never surrender national sovereignty directly, so the EU institutions were created under the pretext of preventing wars. By relinquishing competencies to the EU, it conditions Europeans to accept a one-world government.

- Role models and influences: The speaker looked to elders and artisans in the community as mentors, including those who built artwork, carried tradition (chanting, drumming), or made items. Family examples included beadwork, basketry, and a father who made blowguns. Despite hardship, these elders remained focused on work and achievement, not poverty. Experiences of discrimination, such as being asked to sit in the back at a cafe in Philadelphia, were acknowledged, as were the sacrifices involved in public service. The speaker references Chief Martin, a predecessor who served in the military and then worked for the people, noting that public service requires sacrificing family and personal desires. The overarching message is that observing role models who worked with their hands and minds to overcome adversity inspired perseverance and responsibility. - Meaning and practice of representation: Representation begins with everyday actions, not just titles—being a giver and community-minded, helping others, and remembering where one comes from. The speaker recalls a generational ethic of work and giving to youth, influenced by parents who uplifted others despite poverty. In formal terms, representation extends beyond local impact to county, state, national, and federal levels, including the possibility of walking the halls of Congress to represent the community’s interests and do the necessary work for its betterment. - Steps for allies and understanding: The speaker advocates for a government-to-government relationship and networking across local, city, county, state, and federal levels to share who they are and why they act as they do. Emphasis is placed on respecting different perspectives and optics—acknowledging that one side may not see what the other sees—and the importance of mutual respect in all interactions. The core idea is that effective allyship and understanding come from open, respectful dialogue that recognizes diverse experiences and viewpoints.

We are establishing a single governance system in Europe and aiming for a global approach to understanding the impact of AI. Similar to the IPCC for Climate, we need a global panel consisting of scientists, tech companies, and independent experts to assess the risks and benefits of AI for humanity. This will enable a coordinated and swift response, building upon the efforts of the Hiroshima process and other initiatives.

Our politicians in Ireland are no different than England and everywhere else. They report up to the network through the European Commission, which is like the Politburo in Soviet times, unelected. And then you've got the European Parliament, which is like the Soviet Parliament in Soviet times. It's a talk shop with no real power. So EU is modeled on purpose on the Soviet system of totalitarian collectivization with unelected bureaucrats. Then you've got the UN, which sprang from Rockefeller's loins. Rockefeller brothers formed the Rockefellers along with the Rothschilds and the Warburgs. All of these structures we've got have been funded and grown, Trilateral Commission, Council Foreign Relations, Bilderberg, W. F. They've all been grown to manage the ant farm of us humans. That's where all our problems come from, and it all goes up essentially to the big banking kind of globalist oligarchs, and they all work together. So we get all this crap that comes down like totally totalitarian dystopian madness. So the key thing for people is to understand your politicians, challenge them on who they're reporting to. That's a key thing, I think. Not don't challenge them about what they're bringing in because that's a waste of time. If everyone is saying we see you and we know you're reporting to a non sovereign, non Irish authority, bringing in things that are against the people's interests. So who are you reporting to? And everyone keeps asking, keeps telling them, we know where you're at. We see you. I think that's important because a lot of people now, even young people are beginning to realize when we were told it was a conspiracy theory that higher powers are basically running our lives in a totalitarian fashion, that was part of the scam. We were indoctrinated to believe that higher up ultra wealthy people running our lives and influencing our governments was a conspiracy theory. But increasingly, people are realizing now, actually, that was a trick to tell us that Uh-huh. Because they are running our lives, and our children's and grandchildren's futures are going to be destroyed by these ultra rich oligarchs if we don't start making a ruckus. Now, wef is a filthy household name. Whereas they worked in the shadows for, like, a century, and no one ever talked about them because they own the media. No. It's 20 social media, you got COVID backlash Yeah. Vaccine backlash, and now you got all these people talking about them. And that's why they're desperately trying to get in hate speech, digital millennium act, censorship, ID for people to get on the Internet. They're really worried about the young people talking. Really scared about that. And, I think it's all on the razor's edge, all to play for for the bad guys and the good guys. Uh-huh. I couldn't call it. I think it's all to play for. So let's double down, more awakening.

Thomas Jefferson believed that a Republic is the best form of government. The political spectrum ranges from anarchists who want no government to totalitarians who advocate complete government control, including communists, Nazis, and fascists. Totalitarians, regardless of their labels, seek total government power over the people.

Some people may use gigantism as a proxy for other concerns, like distrust of large governments. They may support institutions like the Catholic church, which has one leader with direct connection to God, no taxes, military, or ability to jail or conscript people.

Europe embodies the values of the Talmud, encompassing the Jewish principles of personal responsibility, justice, and solidarity.

Individualists believe in personal responsibility for oneself, family, and others in need, while collectivists argue for state responsibility. Socialism, communism, globalism, and Nazism are forms of collectivism, with globalism aiming for a one-world government under the guise of unity and sustainability, often using crises to push their agenda.

Statism is imposed by an alliance between the state apparatus and opinion-molding groups, historically the churches. The church tells the people to obey the state, sometimes claiming the king is divinely sanctioned. In return, the church receives part of the state revenue through tax subsidies. This alliance of "throne and altar" was prevalent until the age of Western Europe.

The speaker asserts that today the most serious evil organization on the face of the earth is the Vatican. The argument then centers on the Knights of Malta, claiming that the six men who founded the CIA in America were all Catholics and members of the Knights of Malta. The speaker further contends that when examining banking fraternities in America, such as the Bank of America and Union Bank in California, the founders and current leaders of these banks, who are running the banking establishment today, are all Knights of Malta, described as Catholic Masonry. From there, the talk expands to a broader claim about European governance, stating that all the kings and rulers in Europe ruled by the divine right, referred to as the divine right of kings. The speaker then questions what represents divine to grant the king the right to rule, answering that the pope holds that role. The pope, according to the claim, appoints certain families to be over the French, and the pope appoints certain people to be over the Germans and over the British. The concept of divine right is then tied directly to the pope, with the assertion that the pope represents God. Because the pope represents God, he is said to be able to declare that a particular family is holy and should rule. Consequently, the speaker argues, this church authority could then claim that they rule by divine right. The overall narrative connects the Vatican, the Knights of Malta, and Catholic Masonry to influential administrative and governmental power structures, including the founding of the CIA and the leadership of major banks, and frames this as evidence of a global governance dynamic justified by divine right under papal authority.