reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The most alarming thing was the organized communication between the FBI, Department of Homeland Security, and tech companies, involving flagging content in large numbers. Four federal judges have ruled that this violates the First Amendment. Former FBI officials within Twitter and other groups worked to censor the Hunter Biden laptop story, despite it not violating Twitter's terms of service. The FBI and CIA had their own internal groups within Twitter. The Aspen Institute held a workshop to discourage coverage of the Hunter Biden laptop story. Content moderators at social media platforms have too much power in determining what Americans can say and see. This collusion between unelected bureaucrats and tech companies is inappropriate and a form of election interference. The censorship organizations tend to have a biased leaning.

Interviewer: Out of all the businesses you guys could buy, why did you guys target buying Pornhub? Executive: We saw an extraordinary opportunity. The fact that we've made the acquisition should tell you this is a space that has not had mainstream investment. It's a space that's legal—it's legal, and in every Western democracy it's constitutionally protected, and it could not be outlawed even if you wanted to. But it doesn't have that legitimacy. Nobody wants to say they are the owners of a major adult company. They want the benefits of owning a major adult company without being out front and engaging with other tech businesses, government, law enforcement, regulation in the way the modern tech industry has to. We saw in this an arbitrage opportunity where people from mainstream professional networks—law, law enforcement, tech, finance, etc.—could bring this industry into the twenty-first century. We saw an extraordinary opportunity to do that with this jewel of an asset, Pornhub, and the entire company. Interviewer: I love it. Here are some stats. In 2018 Pornhub alone witnessed a jaw-dropping 5.8 billion hours of content consumption. Our average visit is about ten and a half minutes. They probably got off the computer and left the website on, but there’s a different story there. So that’s nearly 665 centuries of material over a single platform in just one year. Here’s another: the world was flocking to Pornhub in 2018 with 63,992 new visitors per minute. Is that true? 63,992 new visitors per month. Executive: About does it sound unreasonable? Interviewer: 33 and a half billion visitors. Insane. The most popular day to visit Pornhub is Sunday. You guys have all these different stats, and you even put up a stat recently on which state consumed the least while the election was going on and who was committed to it. So you’re also involved in the election stuff that’s going on. But at the same time, you’ve got a petition— Executive: More than 2,200,000 people have signed an online petition to shut down the site. Interviewer: Why do you think that is? Executive: The topic of pornography has always been a divisive one. It has to do with sexuality in general. There are always going to be different views about human sexuality, and pornography is emblematic of those. It’s sex for the public. So you’re going to have people with deeply held convictions about the proper place of sex in our society, and that’s a good debate. But you take two and a half million signatures; we have a 130,000,000 daily active users. People have voted with their mice and with their feet in terms of where they’re going. But, of course, it’s going to be a subject of public debate.

Pornhub, the largest porn website with 130 million daily users, is under investigation for hosting illegal videos, including those of minors being raped. Lila McCoy exposed the lack of safeguards in place, leading to the removal of 80% of the site's content. Victims are relieved, but the fight continues for justice.

The Biden administration's team would call and aggressively demand the removal of certain content, but we refused to take down anything that was true. They wanted us to remove a meme about potential future compensation for COVID vaccine recipients, but we stood our ground on not censoring humor or satire. Eventually, Biden made a statement accusing us of causing harm, which led various government agencies to investigate our company. The situation became very intense and challenging for us.

Chuck Schumer, the Senate majority leader, called for the censorship of a video showing evidence of wrongdoing by the federal government and the police department controlled by Nancy Pelosi. He claimed that showing the video was a threat to democracy. Schumer was joined by Mitch McConnell and other Republicans in their outrage and calls for censorship. This reaction stems from fear and panic because the videos challenge the lies they have been telling. It is clear that they are all on the same side, regardless of party affiliation, and are aligned against everyone else. This incident reveals their shared interests and exposes their true intentions.

If Kamala wins, the boycott against X will intensify, potentially leading to its shutdown. A Kamala-led administration wouldn't allow X to continue operating. Is there a way to shut it down? Absolutely. The Department of Justice could be weaponized, filing massive lawsuits under the guise of combating "hate speech" and "misinformation." Despite being the actual source of misinformation, this wouldn't deter them from using the DOJ to target X.

I received disturbing information about a website for pedophiles and immediately reported it to law enforcement and news stations. Despite my efforts, no one took action. The website was run by a Democratic politician, Nathan Larson, who openly discussed disturbing intentions. He was eventually arrested for kidnapping a 12-year-old. Sadly, there are more individuals like him on our list who have committed heinous acts. It is alarming how many people think and act this way.

There's now more to the cover up story of Tom Alexandervich, Israel's cyber chief who was busted in a sting operation. New details say Sean King was silenced by X; in the middle of the night all posts about Tom Alexandervich were removed. They were removed because the Israeli government asked X to take them down, and X complied. Israel, the government agency that asked for X to remove the post, was the very agency Tom Alexandervich heads. Sean King's post alleges that in the middle of the night, tweets about Israeli Tom Alexandrovich—arrested in Las Vegas for sex crimes against children—were deleted, including every retweet and link to his articles. Based on verified reports, X voluntarily deleted the tweets under doxing policies likely promoted by Israel's cyber unit where Alexandervich worked. This lacks a public US legal mandate, effectively limiting scrutiny and indirectly protecting the accused from public exposure.

The article on Gawker sparked significant backlash, leading Senator Charles Schumer to call for federal authorities to shut down the site. This challenge to governmental authority was seen as a threat to youth, prompting serious attention from the Senate. The discussion on the Senate floor marked the beginning of increased scrutiny, with the FBI and other agencies taking notice. As a result, the individual associated with the site became a target of investigation.

Taking on the intelligence community is incredibly risky. They have numerous ways to retaliate. Even a shrewd businessman would be foolish to antagonize them. I've heard they're extremely angry about how they've been treated and spoken about. I don't know exactly what they might do if provoked, but it's a dangerous game to play.

Dangerous rhetoric online is impacting the recovery effort. One user suggested a militia should go against FEMA, gaining over a million views. This rhetoric impacts the comfort level of FEMA employees and demoralizes first responders, FEMA staff, volunteers, and the private sector working to help people. It creates fear in FEMA employees, hindering the ability to get resources to those who need them.

The discussion centers on a set of interconnected rumors and reported events involving Hillary Clinton’s private email server, Anthony Weiner’s laptop, and a wave of NYPD suicides, with the following key points emphasized by the speakers: - The FBI is reopening its investigation into Hillary Clinton’s email scandal after the Wall Street Journal reported that 650,000 emails are on Anthony Weiner’s laptop, and thousands of those may involve Clinton’s server because Weiner was married to Clinton aide Huma Abedin during Clinton’s tenure as secretary of state. It is noted that Clinton “bleached and deleted 33,000 emails after receiving a congressional subpoena” to cover up her crimes. - A computer used by former congressman Anthony Weiner and his estranged wife, Huma Abedin, became the focus of new inquiries into Clinton’s use of a private email server. Sources say there could be as many as 650,000 emails on the computer, with metadata suggesting thousands could have been sent to or from Clinton’s private server. The laptop’s significance is tied to its potential connection to Clinton’s emails. - It is asserted that Anthony Weiner’s laptopsite had kill switches, and that the laptop had not previously been discussed in the Clinton email probe. Weiner’s communications with a minor are described in detail, including an exclusive interview with Inside Edition where a 15-year-old girl recounts sending a message to Weiner in January 2016, which escalated to obscene messages. - The exposure of those messages is linked to the FBI’s investigation; it is claimed that Weiner’s laptop revealed emails from Hillary Clinton to Huma Abedin, and that the FBI’s review of the Weiner laptop led James Comey to reopen the investigation into Clinton’s use of a private email server just days before the presidential election. The girl’s identity is being withheld due to being underage, though her father allowed her face to be shown. - Weiner pled guilty to a charge of transferring obscene material to a minor. Commentators discuss the October 2016 Comey announcement reopening the investigation as potentially politically motivated or an attempt to cover prior inaction, with some asserting that the NYPD would have disclosed additional information if not for the FBI’s handling. - The NYPD reportedly found numerous Clinton emails, Clinton Foundation emails, and Huma Abedin’s emails on Weiner’s laptop, along with state department correspondences and other material, described as damning criminal information involving Hillary, her circle, and other Democrats. It is claimed they faced pressure to go public if the FBI did not reopen the investigation or pursue timely indictments. - Beyond the Clinton emails, the conversation includes sensational allegations of sex rings and criminal activity, including a claim that Hillary traveled to a place described as “sex island” with Jeffrey Epstein; Bill Clinton allegedly visited there many times. There are allegations that the material included “insurance policy” files and other damning content. Officers who reportedly reviewed the material allegedly suffered trauma and were said to have died, though specifics and verifications are disputed. - The dialogue notes that there were 12 individuals who saw Weiner’s laptop; it is claimed nine of those who viewed the material died, though one speaker later remarks that none of the 12 are dead. Additional reporting mentions a NYPD deputy chief, Steven Silks, who allegedly oversaw evidence from the Weiner laptop and died by suicide, with speculation about copies of the laptop being held by police brass. The discussion suggests that if the FBI hadn’t pursued the matter, there would be broader revelations. - Other speakers reference an influence of the Weiner laptop on broader investigations and imply that the material could have substantial legal consequences, including potential prosecutions.

I aimed to take down a website that exploited young girls. After discovering a vulnerability, I accessed their server in about one to two hours. I believed I had crucial evidence that could lead to arrests, so I reported it to the exploited children tip line and reached out to various news stations. They were initially excited but ultimately refused to cover the story after legal review. I also contacted Project Veritas with evidence, but no media outlet showed interest in pursuing the issue. I even sought help from law enforcement, but they were unresponsive. I consulted attorneys, including one in Virginia, but they were unsure how to proceed, especially since the website's owner was a Democratic politician who had run for Congress twice.

Speaker 0 asserts: I’m not suicidal. Any creator, politician, or celebrity who tries to make a film or documentary on CPS has wound up dead, including a senator. The November film will be their hardest hitting, and they will “rip the veil off” to the point where CPS shows up at your door. Our government is running the world’s largest child trafficking network. They emphasize they would never kill themselves, do drugs, or put themselves in dangerous environments; if anything happens to them, it is the United States government. They watched the first take of the film and say, “they’re gonna kill me.” They urge a trip down memory lane to discuss Pizzagate, stating this is where it all starts. Speaker 1 begins by saying the Pizzagate story has outrageous connections and promising brand-new whistleblower information that will blow minds. They provide an overview: back to Bill and Hillary Clinton, whom many believe to be child pedophiles. They say there’s never been direct evidence, but in 02/2016 WikiLeaks published Hillary Clinton emails with John Podesta showing coded language about a child trafficking ring centered in a Washington, DC pizza restaurant basement at Comet Ping Pong. Edgar Maddison Welch went to the restaurant with firearms to “liberate the children,” but no one was hurt; it was later said there wasn’t a basement, so the scandal was dismissed, though there’s more to the story. The transcript then ties Hillary Clinton to Laura Silsbee, who was involved in trafficking, and outlines a chain: Hillary Clinton and Laura Silsbee exchanged documents detailing logistics of trafficking children from Haiti to Boise, Idaho. Laura Silsbee had previously kidnapped several dozen children from Haiti and attempted to cross into the Dominican Republic; she was caught and the children were returned to their families. Shawnee M. King is cited for reporting on Silsbee’s case. Jorge Puello, an attorney for Silsbee’s group, was suspected of leading an international trafficking ring; Puello was arrested in investigations by ICE and Homeland Security; his wife faced charges of sexual exploitation of minors and women. The narrative claims Hillary Clinton and Laura Silsbee were connected; Bill and Hillary Clinton allegedly helped negotiate the release of Laura Silsbee and her accomplices after their imprisonment in Haiti. Speaker 1 then ties the connections to CPS: the number-one source of child trafficking is the U.S. CPS system, and the number-one gateway to sex trafficking in America is the foster care system. The foster care system allegedly lost over 100,000 children in the last twenty years, raised questions about where they went, and claims millions of children are abused in foster care by financially compensated foster parents and social workers. The Adoptive Safe Families Act (ASFA), championed by Hillary Clinton and signed by Bill Clinton in 1997, supposedly created and financed CPS/foster care by diverting Social Security funds to 50 states, giving a financial incentive to “kidnap” children. It is claimed that CPS targets poor and minority children and single-parent families, and that the system now functions as a government-subsidized child-trafficking ring. Speaker 1 lists correlations: CPS is a tool used to target conservatives; CPS offices get paid per child kidnapped; 83% of removals lack proof of abuse. The claim is that Hillary Clinton created the system and that Laura Silsbee, a friend of Clinton, is involved in Idaho’s CPS network. Laura Silsbee allegedly works with Idaho Department of Health and Welfare (IDHW) and is a registered foster care parent in Idaho, receiving monthly payments for children in her custody, as shown by whistleblower-provided screenshots. Idaho’s Attorney General Raul Labrador opened an investigation into IDHW financial misappropriations, but Idaho’s Department director Dave Jepison resigned and disappeared, and Judge Lynn Norton allegedly issued an order halting the AG’s investigation. The Idaho Department of Health and Welfare allegedly dominates Idaho’s budget, and Laura Silsbee’s role with IDHW is framed as proof of a nationwide system. The narrative concludes by warning Idahoans to beware of Laura Silsbee (aka Laura Gaylor), Judge Norton, and supporters of IDHW, asserting that the system extends to all 50 states, including Arizona, Texas, and Florida, which are described as among the worst offenders in CPS corruption.

The speaker recounts a long-standing pattern of interactions with federal agents, noting that jokes about agents reading their chats stopped being funny for a period. They describe being pressured to work for these agencies for months, a pressure that left no paper trail and was deliberately concealed. Each time agents visited their home, they were asked to shut off their phone and told not to tell anyone about what was happening. The speaker explains that the only reason they can discuss the situation now is that they made a deliberate, fear-driven decision to do so. They recall sweating and nearly vomiting, and they went so far as to clip a DJI microphone to their bra before every visit, anxious that the device would beep or reveal what was being discussed. This precaution reflects the level of fear and the stakes involved in the interactions. They claim to have later confronted Parliament about the surveillance and pressure campaigns they faced, actions taken after they recorded evidence of these activities. The speaker asserts a broader possibility: there exists a very real world in which they did none of that—where they would still be online today as an independent influencer while privately secretly acting on behalf of Canadian intelligence agencies—because they were made to believe they would go to jail. They emphasize that they are not the only person affected by this dynamic, suggesting a wider pattern or network behind these experiences.

This memo from Health and Human Services signals that anyone interfering with gender affirming care will be targeted by the federal government, who will use their full power to achieve their political goals. This memo greenlights the manipulation of HIPAA, which is intended to protect patient privacy, not shield billion-dollar hospital corporations. Federal agents from Health and Human Services showed up to investigate a case regarding medical records, handing me a target letter, which indicated I was the focus of a criminal investigation by the U.S. Attorney's Office in Texas. Receiving that target letter meant everything was about to change.

The Biden administration's team aggressively pressured us to remove content, often resorting to yelling and cursing. Despite their demands, we refused to take down truthful posts, including a meme about potential compensation for COVID vaccine recipients. We stood firm against removing humor and satire. Eventually, Biden publicly accused us of causing harm, which led to various government agencies investigating our company. The situation became extremely challenging for us.

I was shocked and disturbed to learn that a government document specifically targeted me based on my reporting. It felt chilling, especially because I never expected this to happen in the United States. I have lived in and visited many authoritarian countries, but I never imagined such actions taking place here.

The speaker discovered disturbing information about a website and immediately reported it to the Exploited Children tip line and various news stations. However, the news stations were not allowed to report on the illegally obtained material. The speaker tried to raise awareness about the website without revealing any illegal content, but their efforts were disregarded. Law enforcement also did not take action. The owner of the website, a Democratic politician named Nathan Larson, was eventually arrested for kidnapping a 12-year-old girl. The speaker believes that there are more individuals involved in such activities and intends to expose them. Nathan Larson later died in prison, allegedly due to starvation.

This memo from Health and Human Services, it's a warning: anyone who interferes with so-called gender affirming care will be targeted by the federal government, who will use its full power to achieve its political goals. The Biden administration is giving the green light to prosecutors to manipulate HIPAA. HIPAA is meant to protect patient privacy, but it's being used to protect billion-dollar hospital corporations. Federal agents from Health and Human Services showed up at my door, investigating a case about medical records and gave me a target letter. The U.S. Attorney's Office in Texas is investigating potential federal law violations, and I am a potential target in a criminal investigation. I knew everything was going to change.

Social media sites must be held responsible and understand their power. The speaker claims these sites speak directly to millions of people without oversight or regulation, and that "has to stop." The speaker asserts that the same rules must apply across platforms like Facebook and Twitter. Someone "has lost his privileges" and content "should be taken down."

A father posted a photo of his child in the bathtub, leading to disturbing comments about the child's safety. The speaker, who had access to the server, consulted an attorney who warned about the risk of reporting the incident due to breaking federal law. However, the speaker decided to take their chances and reached out to news stations and attorneys. Despite the interest in the story, no one posted it when it reached the legal stage. Later, the speaker learned about the arrest of Nathaniel Larson, who had kidnapped and raped a 12-year-old girl. The speaker had evidence of Larson's activities and those of 3,000 others, but nothing was done about it.