reSee.it - Related Video Feed

I apologize to everyone here. However, our apology is not accepted by the speaker. They are tired of liberal apologies and believe they hold no value. They mention an ethics violation in February and another one now. They criticize our pride on the first day and claim that Justin Trudeau's actions prove we cannot be nonpartisan. They suggest that if we have any integrity, we should step down.

The events on Friday were unacceptable and embarrassing to the House and Canadians. The speaker should listen to members and step down. Translation: What happened on Friday was not okay and brought shame to the House and Canadians. The speaker should heed the members' calls and resign.

- Speaker 0 apologized in 2016 for a promise about 1000 euros, stating that was a mistake and clarifying that it is not about Ukraine joining the European Union; they are against that as well. - On policy positions, Speaker 0 says: there should not be changes to mortgage interest deduction; they are not in favor of increasing the deductible; they are investing half a billion in the development of alternative energy, with a caveat about wind turbines, noting that those wind turbines operate on subsidies and “do not operate on wind.” - Speaker 1 recalls a statement from nine years ago about a street worker who works 40 years and can retire at 65, noting that nothing of that has been seen in recent years. Speaker 0 counters with “five years said, right?” to confirm the timeline. - Speaker 0 references a past claim about someone being under oath, saying that if it involved political motives, the law would be set aside. They remark not to recall a speech about “group immunity,” and state they have not heard such a speech. - The discussion moves to a person not being in service of the VVD; they state she does not work for the VVD, has no VVD parliamentary pass, and that Speaker 0 had lied about the matter being about Omtzigt. - Speaker 0 asserts that they did so to the best of their knowledge, admitting there was no memo that had been requested by the informant or informally requested; they did not have that memory and could not reconstruct what was discussed in 2015. They acknowledge uncertainty about what exactly was on the table in 2015 and admit they cannot precisely reconstruct those details. - They mention a second example and reference someone named Caroline, then question whether it is odd that officials would be aware of something and the other person would not be informed. They ask if this was four years ago, saying they would not know. They conclude by saying they have misremembered this in hindsight and express sincere regret.

We apologize for the incident on Friday and extend our apologies to President Zelensky and the Ukrainian delegation. Recognizing the individual in question was a mistake and disrespectful to the victims of the Nazi regime.

Tulsi Gabbard is described as "doing a great job" in the speaker’s view, with an aside that includes the word "Whisk." The speaker notes that Gabbard "took a lot of heat two days ago because she went in at Pam's insistence," and that she "looked at votes that wanna be checked out from Georgia." The question is raised aloud: "They say, why is she doing it? Right, Pam? Why is she doing it?" The response given is that the reason is "Because Pam wanted her to do it." The speaker emphasizes the motive by stating, "And you know why? Because she's smart." The dialogue then references a belief that others suggested the action was tied to Gabbard’s position or stance, saying, "they said, well, this has to do her position. Has to do it's really not so, but her position has to do with international." The speaker counters that line of thinking by invoking a different narrative about international affairs and election interference. The speaker recalls the longstanding chorus that has claimed Russia, Russia, Russia has been meddling in elections, noting, "the same people that said that, they've been saying Russia, Russia, Russia has been screwing our elections." The speaker then contemplates the possibility that Russia "had something to do with it," but follows with, "They say, no. No. Russia didn't have." The implication is that the narrative on foreign interference has shifted, leading to the assertion that "now they're saying Russia had nothing to do with it." The speaker adds a broader hypothetical, stating, "Because if I say Russia, that it's perfectly fine. But you could add China and about five other countries to it." Amid these discussions, the speaker reiterates praise for Tulsi Gabbard: "But she's done a great job, and Pam has done a fantastic job, and we appreciate it both." The closing lines suggest a personal note about not having seen the person in a while: "I haven't seen you in a couple of times. And I have one of..." The remainder of the sentence is cut off in the transcript.

The speaker acknowledges that all the failures and risks leading up to the tragedy were known beforehand. They mention the failure to prevent, plan, manage, and respond to the contingencies that arose that day. The speaker also mentions the failure to act quickly when the situation escalated. Viewers are questioning if someone should apologize for these oversights. The other speaker cannot say when apologies will be made but expresses heartbreak over the situation. They believe that as a society, we have neglected global warming and failed to prioritize important matters.

We apologize for the incident on Friday and extend our apologies to President Zelensky and the Ukrainian delegation. Recognizing the individual in question was a mistake and disrespectful to the victims of the Nazi regime.

The exchange centers on whether the person being spoken to is the author of a controversial social media post and on whether authorities should press for a response. The conversation begins with an attempt to verify the person’s identity: “Picture to make sure it's you. We're not sure.” The responding party, referred to as Speaker 0, declines to answer without his lawyer present, stating, “I refuse to answer questions without my lawyer present. So I really don't know how to answer that question either.” He emphasizes his stance with a nod to freedom of speech, saying, “Well, you're like I said, you're not gonna is freedom of speech. This is America. Right? Veteran. Alright. And I agree with you 100%.” The officers explain they are trying to identify the correct person to speak with and proceed with the inquiry. Speaker 1 presents the substance of the post in question: “the guy who consistently calls for the death of all Palestinians tried to shut down a theater for showing a movie that hurt his feelings and refuses to stand up for the LGBTQ community in any way, Even leave the room when they vote and on related matters. Wants you to know that you're all welcome clown face clown face clown face.” They ask Speaker 0 if that post was authored by him. Speaker 0 again refuses to confirm, stating, “I’m not gonna answer whether that’s me or not.” The discussion shifts to the underlying concern. Speaker 1 clarifies that their goal is not to establish whether the post is true, but to prevent somebody else from being agitated or agreeing with the statement. They quote the line about “the guy who consistently calls for the death of all Palestinians” and note that such a post “can probably incite somebody to do something radical.” The purpose of the inquiry, they say, is to obtain Speaker 0’s side of the story and to address the potential impact of the post. Speaker 1 urges Speaker 0 to refrain from posting statements like that because they could provoke actions. Speaker 0 expresses appreciation for the outreach, but reiterates that he will maintain his amendment rights to not answer the question. He concludes by acknowledging the interaction and affirming that the conversation ends there: “That is it. And we're gonna maintain my amendment rights to, not answer the question about whether or that's fine.” Both parties part on a courteous note, with Speaker 0 thanking them and wishing them well.

The transcript centers on a shared, emotional goodbye to “Queen Erica,” with multiple speakers repeatedly declaring that “We’re all grieving with Queen Erica” and “America’s with Erica” or similar variants. The repeated refrain emphasizes a collective sense of mourning and solidarity with Queen Erica, as the speakers insist that “We’re all grieving with Queen Erica,” including lines such as “we mazel tov” and variants like “America’s with Erica,” “America’s for Erica,” and “America Macha Body,” underscoring a broad national or communal outpouring of grief. In addition to the recurring grief motif, Speaker 2 introduces a personal identifier and role: “I am Zion Shixaferer, the queen of TPUS and was chosen for my role controlling.” This statement anchors a claim of belonging to a specific group or title and asserts a chosen position of control. The dialogue then shifts into a more chaotic, accusatory, and confessional tone, with Speaker 2 declaring: “I’ve got you going by these nuts. You cyber skits, you was all our schmucks.” This line conveys insults and a charge of deception or manipulation toward a group described as “you cyber skits” and “our schmucks.” There is a reference to seeking intervention from Barry Weiss: “I cried to Barry Weiss to stop.” The content then touches on religious spaces and national conflict metaphors: “We hide inside your church and mosque,” followed by a personal family context: “My parents made Israeli home with raky yarn and iron dome.” The speaker further describes personal danger or danger to a family member: “My hubby’s body's knocked day round. He’s digging tunnels under the ground,” which evokes images of conflict, injury, and clandestine activity. Speaker 1 continues the grieving refrain: “We’re all grieving with Queen Erica,” adding variants such as “Team Erica, and the socks,” and “our Erica, miss Erizionna,” along with more emphatic lines like “crocodile crying wonder bra” and “we’re all grieving between Erica.” The exact phrases reiterate the collective mourning and blend in odd or nonsensical descriptors, maintaining the overarching theme of mourning for Queen Erica. The exchange ends with a fragment: “Missus Just Love’s Son. Missus Just,” leaving an unresolved cadence that continues the pattern of fragmented, personal asides interwoven with the central grief refrain.

I want to acknowledge Congresswoman Deborah Ross, who unfortunately couldn't be here today. She is currently in Washington fighting for the people in this district. I apologize for the confusion earlier when I mentioned she had left because we just took a picture together. Deborah is a dedicated advocate for our community.

Everything that has been heard and read is true, and the speaker is deeply sorry. They hurt Alex Turk, his friends, and family, which they regret. The speaker also apologizes to the people of San Francisco for letting them down, and commits to restoring their trust and confidence. They will work hard to ensure the city's business is handled appropriately. A personal apology is extended to everyone in the administration, staff, friends, and family members.

Friday's events were unacceptable and embarrassing to the House and Canadians. The speaker should listen to members and step down.

Speaker 0: Many people owe Linda Yacarino an apology. Initially, she faced criticism and was called names when she joined X. However, she has proven herself by risking her reputation for free speech and humanity. Despite facing attacks from Media Matters and powerful individuals, Linda remains steadfast and has released impressive statements. Those who spoke ill of her should apologize. Linda deserves recognition for her excellent work. Thank you, Linda.

The speaker of the house resigned after inviting an actual Nazi to the House of Commons. The prime minister is being blamed for the embarrassment, but he claims no one knew ahead of time. The government vetted the Nazi, and a minister tried to erase the incident from the historical record. The member for Thornhill demands an apology from the prime minister for slandering and dishonoring Holocaust survivors. The government house leader defends the speaker's decision and emphasizes that no one in the chamber knew who the Nazi was. The speaker has taken responsibility and resigned.

I am resigning as Speaker of the House of Commons due to my mistake in recognizing an individual during a joint address. I apologize for causing pain to the Jewish community, survivors of Nazi atrocities, and others. My resignation is effective tomorrow to allow for the election of a new speaker. Thank you for your support during my term.

I am resigning as Speaker of the House of Commons due to recognizing an individual during a joint address, causing pain to various communities. My resignation is effective tomorrow to allow for the election of a new speaker. Thank you for your support during my term.

A historic day for New Zealand. Jacinda Ardern spoke of remorse and regret as she delivered an unreserved apology. I stand on behalf of the New Zealand government to offer a formal and unreserved apology. Government expresses its sorrow, remorse, and regret that these actions were ever considered appropriate.

I apologize for recording a video message that was shown at a partisan gathering. It was a mistake and I should not have done it. As the Speaker, I understand that I am human and can make errors. However, I am committed to doing better. I will implement a stricter communication protocol and seek guidance from parliamentary experts to prevent this from happening again. Respect for people, decorum, and the institution of Parliament are important to me. I am still learning in this role.

The speaker acknowledges someone's goodness and godliness while lamenting their absence. They state they are honoring the person's legacy, not berating it or shaming anyone. Instead, they are humbling themselves.

Speaker 0: Many people owe miss Linda Yacarino an apology. Initially, she faced criticism and was labeled as a World Economic Forum lizard person, a globalist shell, and a snake. However, she has proven her commitment to free speech and humanity by putting her esteemed reputation on the line. Despite facing backlash from Media Matters and powerful individuals calling for her resignation, Linda remains steadfast and continues to release impressive statements. Those who spoke ill of Linda should apologize to her now. Let's appreciate the great job she is doing. Thank you, Linda.

I will address the house and offer Parliament's apologies for the recent incident. The speaker took full responsibility and has stepped down. We deeply regret standing and clapping without knowing the context, as it was a violation of the Holocaust victims' memory. This incident caused immense pain to Jewish people, as well as Polish, Roma, 2SLGBTQI plus, disabled, and racialized individuals who were targeted by the Nazi genocide.

Speaker 0 says, 'I know that big picture, we're all over the place, but I also know that on a community scale and what we're doing for the kids is what's most important.' He continues, 'I miss the mark on the board' and, 'I miss the mark as a as a representative of the board.' So if it's okay to pause on that one, 'I hear you all. Thank you for being honest.' He adds, 'I know this was not easy.' and concludes, 'And yes, I will step down with the board.' The remarks emphasize prioritizing the community and kids, acknowledging mistakes, and the intention to resign from the board.

I apologize for my remarks in the leaked video, which seemed to make light of the COVID-19 rules. I regret those comments and apologize to everyone at home. Working in government is a privilege, and I have always tried to behave with civility and decency. I am proud of the progress made on climate change and nature at COP 26. I understand the anger and frustration people feel, especially those who lost loved ones or struggled with their businesses. I am truly sorry. I am offering my resignation to the prime minister. Thank you for your time.

I will address the house to apologize for inviting and recognizing a controversial figure. The speaker took responsibility and resigned. We regret clapping without knowing the context, which hurt many communities. We deeply apologize for disrespecting the memory of Holocaust victims. We are sorry for the distress caused to President Zelensky and the Ukrainian delegation. It is concerning that Russia is using this mistake for false propaganda. Let us never forget the atrocities of the Holocaust.

The speaker acknowledges that people will be hurt by a particular vote. They state that they worked hard to achieve a budget deal that would avoid the provision that led to the negative impact.