reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The White House was asked if the president still stands by his statement that he has never been involved in his son's affairs or spoken to him about it. The response was that the president has never been in business with his son, and there is nothing more to add.

There are reports of a Downing Street Christmas party on Friday night, according to Twitter. The Prime Minister was asked if he acknowledges these reports, but he did not provide a direct response.

Nigel Farage is said to be the subject of an in-depth investigation in The Times into “illicit funding,” undeclared and running into millions, attributed to a convicted criminal. The betting markets are described as nearly closed on the proposition that Nigel Farage is poised to resign over mounting financial scandals. The speaker predicts that reform is finished “with Nigel Farage,” especially if he is forced out by House of Commons authorities. The speaker then claims that the BBC has used “the law to force you to pay them,” and says the BBC has informed YouTube that it must prioritize “trusted news sources.” The speaker argues that prioritizing BBC One, BBC Two, Channel Four, Sky News, and “Uncle Tom, Cobbly and all” would deprioritize other outlets, and claims YouTube must comply “on pain of financial sanction or worse.” The speaker adds that after this, a BBC license fee may be charged for watching YouTube, which is currently exempt. They say many people watch television only on computers via YouTube and other platforms and therefore avoid a license fee, but predict this will not last. The speaker moves to international stories, describing the funeral of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei (Sayyid Ali Khamenei), the leader and theologian of Iran, and says he was slain by “the United States and Israel” on the first day of the Ramadan war. The speaker claims Khamenei’s wife, daughter, and her children were also killed, and says a 14-month-old granddaughter was burned to death while playing with toys. The speaker further claims Washington, D.C., and “occupied Tel Aviv” were locations of attacks involving children, and says 160 schoolgirls were murdered in Minab while sitting at desks. They describe a funeral process lasting six days because coffins of Khamenei’s family are moved around cities in Iran, then to Karbala in neighboring Iraq, and finally back to Mashhad where he will be buried. The speaker says funeral commemorations involve “10 million people” in Tehran and calls it “the biggest funeral in human history,” adding that Trump’s July 4th celebrations were overshadowed. According to the speaker, Donald Trump reacted to Axios accounts of “millions of people weeping,” despite claims that they “didn’t like him.” The speaker says Trump is now seeing the same pictures, and claims the grieving crowd is shifting toward revenge, with “red flags of revenge” replacing other flags. They argue the chant “death to America” would be expected because, they say, it was America that caused the funeral and murdered Khamenei and others, leading to further war dynamics. The speaker then delivers a history of “American imperialism,” saying the U.S. is 250 years old and that only 19 years have passed without the U.S. being at war with other people. They claim the U.S. and Western Europe have invaded other countries, “stealing their land,” “stealing their wealth,” and taking people as slaves, and they assert that the U.S. was founded on “the genocide of the Native American people.” They claim Spanish, French, English, and “Western, settler colonialism” murdered “a hundred million Native Americans,” and say Africans were taken into slavery and later subjected to apartheid systems “until this day.” They also mention celebrations by people in Beirut and by “lunatics in Japan” after U.S. atomic bombs. Finally, the speaker returns to Trump’s July 4th events, calling him a “thief,” a “betrayer,” and accusing him of abusing women and allegedly “little girls,” associating him with “Epstein class degenerates,” and says it is a misfortune that the time has been “Donald Trump.” They end by saying two guests will appear, beginning with Professor Mohammad Marandi, “direct from Tehran.”

Speaker 0 is asked if he accepted bribes and if he would comment on the arrest of the former president.

Boris Johnson's former spokeswoman, Allegra Stratton, was caught on footage discussing a fictional party that resembled the alleged Downing Street Christmas party. The video, filmed in December 2020, shows staff members trying to come up with answers about the event. The government has been unable to provide a clear explanation about what happened, despite the importance of their messaging during that time. Officials have repeatedly stated that all rules and guidance were followed, but have not directly denied the existence of the party. The controversy remains unresolved, leaving bereaved families seeking answers.

The speaker questions the relationship between Keir Starmer and the head of MI5, suggesting it is unusual that they had drinks together. Despite sending questions to Starmer, he never replies. Jonathan Evans confirmed that they attended his farewell drinks, but couldn't recall if they spoke. The speaker emphasizes that this interaction was not standard procedure for CPS directors. This raises suspicions about Starmer's connections and actions. Translation: The speaker raises concerns about Keir Starmer's interaction with the head of MI5, highlighting the lack of transparency and unusual nature of their meeting.

Downing Street is facing backlash after a video surfaced showing senior staff laughing and joking during a time when COVID restrictions were in place. The police are considering whether to investigate the incident. The video has sparked outrage, especially considering the hardships people faced during that time, such as canceled Christmases and being unable to see loved ones. This situation is seen as worse than the Dominic Cummings scandal, as Downing Street seemingly ignored public outrage and repeated their actions. The government's denial of the party despite video evidence has only added to the perception of dishonesty and a lack of accountability within the government. The prime minister must take responsibility and address the situation.

The Secret Service is investigating who in the Trump campaign knew about a recent service issue. Some people close to Trump were unaware. Trump has a close security team that he trusts and respects.

Former UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson apologizes for the pain and loss experienced by the country during the coronavirus pandemic.

Trump denies climate change while in Vegas. Ready to start the event.

Americans, happy pride month! There has been a shocking discovery of cocaine near the oval office, raising questions about how it got into the White House and who brought it in. It seems that Trump doesn't believe in honesty and decency. On a lighter note, Merry Christmas! How are you? Everything good? Are you doing well in school? We are now saying merry Christmas.

In 2020, UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson claimed he nearly died of COVID-19, with doctors preparing to announce his death. However, a recent investigation revealed this story was untrue, causing disbelief in his honesty.

Trump was shot at a rally, but media outlets like CNN downplayed it as a fall or incident. The divide in the US deepens.

Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau was unable to attend several events at the recent G20 summit due to a valid reason, according to ex-diplomat Deepak Vohra on Indian TV. Allegedly, Trudeau spent two days in his hotel room due to a cocaine overdose. Sniffer dogs on Trudeau's plane reportedly nearly fainted upon landing in Delhi as the entire aircraft was allegedly covered in cocaine. For more information, watch the video by Nicholas Faniyamin, a credible and targeted source of rumors about the President.

If there's a big party happening, it's important to call the police because large gatherings of 30 or more people can help spread the coronavirus. We all have a responsibility to be mindful of each other and follow the rules set by the government. If I were at home and saw something inappropriate, I would definitely call the police, even if it was a social gathering. The government's advice is clear: people should not be gathering.

A speaker claims that in Britain, over a quarter of a million people have been issued non-crime hate incidents, and people are imprisoned for reposting memes and social media posts. They ask if the Trump administration would consider political asylum for British citizens in this situation. Speaker 1 responds that they have not heard this proposal or discussed it with the president, but they will speak to the national security team to see if the administration would entertain it.

Speaker 0 confirms making a phone call to the Prime Minister at 3:34 pm. Speaker 1 questions if there is a record of this call that hasn't been disclosed. Speaker 0 clarifies that there is a record of the call but not the content. Speaker 1 asks if Speaker 0 remembers what was said, to which Speaker 0 affirms.

The discussion centers on the BBC Panorama documentary situation and the Trump camp’s reaction. It recalls that last week The Telegraph in the UK published the leaked Prescott memo, revealing that Panorama had spliced together two clips from a January 2021 Trump speech in a misleading way. After a brief period of silence from the White House, the Telegraph secured an interview with Caroline Levitt, Donald Trump’s press secretary, who described the BBC coverage as “100%, fake news.” The segment suggests the White House was aware of the documentary and the leaked memo, and that the issue was on Trump’s desk over the weekend. Nigel Farage, Reform UK leader and GB News presenter, claimed he spoke with Trump on Friday and that Trump was so angry he couldn’t broadcast a reaction. A copy of a four-page letter from Donald Trump’s lawyers, Britco PLLC of Coral Gables, Florida, to BBC general counsel Sarah Jones is discussed. The letter sets a November 14, 2025, 5 PM deadline and threatens “to enforce his legal and equitable rights, all of which are expressly reserved and are not waived,” including filing “legal action for no less, than $1,000,000,000, in damages” if the BBC does not retract what was said in the Panorama documentary. The BBC is explicitly said to be “on notice.” The BBC’s annual budget is noted as just over £5,000,000,000, underscoring the magnitude of the claimed damages. It’s noted that Panorama was produced by an outside company, October Productions, and not directly by the BBC. Some BBC journalists are reportedly angry about the splicing and the alteration of a sentence, and they wish to distance themselves from the outside production. Nevertheless, the piece emphasizes that BBC management likely should have caught the issue. The report also mentions the broader BBC context and signals that the Washington focus is on what Trump might say when he speaks to the media, anticipated alongside comments with the Syrian president in the coming days.

The speaker stated that the intelligence community repeatedly and incidentally collected information about US citizens involved in the Trump transition. Details about US persons associated with the incoming administration, with little or no apparent foreign intelligence value, were widely disseminated in intelligence community reporting. The speaker also confirmed that additional names of Trump transition team members were unmasked. He emphasized that none of this surveillance was related to Russia or the investigation of Russian activities or of the Trump team. The House Intelligence Committee will thoroughly investigate the surveillance and its subsequent dissemination to determine several questions: who was aware of it; why it was not disclosed to Congress; who requested and authorized the additional unmasking; whether anyone directed the intelligence community to focus on Trump associates; and whether any laws, regulations, or procedures were violated. The speaker said he has asked the directors of the FBI, the NSA, and the CIA to expeditiously comply with his March 15 letter and to provide a full account of these surveillance activities. He noted that he informed Speaker Ryan of this new information this morning and that he would be going to the White House this afternoon to share what he knows with the president and his team. Before taking questions, the speaker referenced a recent event, expressing concern over a terrorist attack in the United Kingdom and extending thoughts and prayers to friends and allies across the pond. He added that intelligence reports clearly show that the president-elect and his team were, at least, monitored and disseminated in intelligence and what appears to be, though not raw, intelligence reporting channels.

Speaker 0 explains that Epstein’s legal problems began with police investigations into allegations that underage women were coming to Epstein’s house. Epstein allegedly believed that Trump was the first to inform the police about what was happening at Epstein’s house, and from that point they became bitter enemies. Speaker 1 asks if this is what Epstein is telling him. Speaker 0 confirms that this is the version he is relaying, as presented by “Oh, the hoax yesterday.” Speaker 2 clarifies that “the hoax” refers to Democrats using a narrative to attack him. He says Epstein has never said or suggested or implied that the hoax is real; he has talked to Epstein many times. He states that the whole thing comes across as a hoax, not that Epstein’s actions are a hoax. He explains that Epstein believes himself innocent, and that when he first heard the rumor, he kicked him out of Maribago. He adds that Epstein was an FBI informant trying to take this matter down. The president knows and has great sympathy for the women who have suffered harms; it’s detestable to him. He and the speaker have spoken as recently as twenty-four hours ago. What he is talking about, according to Speaker 2, are the Democrats who are pursuing this with impure motives. If they truly cared, he asks, why didn’t they act during the four years of the Biden administration when the Biden DOJ had all the records? They didn’t say a word about it, and now they pursue it for political purposes. Speaker 3 notes that our current president has had relationships with Epstein in the past, and mentions Katie Johnson and possibly other victims who have accused Trump of involvement in similar matters. In the speaker’s experience, Trump supporters will not listen to such claims. He admits the court of law isn’t present here. He asks if there is anything that can be said about the validity of those claims or whether more is known. Speaker 1 responds that he can say nothing at all. He states that the only thing he can say about President Trump is that in 2009, when he served subpoenas and gave notice to connected people that he wanted to talk to them, Trump was the only person who picked up the phone and said, “let’s just talk.” Trump offered as much time as needed, provided information that checked out, and helped him so they didn’t have to depose him. He adds that this occurred in 2009. Speaker 3 asks if there is any truth to James Patterson’s claims that Trump kicked Epstein out of Mar-a-Lago. Speaker 1 confirms that he definitely heard that.

Speaker is asked if they agree with congressional Republicans' call for resignation, but does not respond when pressed by the speaker of the house.

BBC's Laura Kuensberg interviews Boris Johnson, who feels a duty to advocate for his beliefs after his role in Brexit. The interview appears staged, with comments suggesting a close relationship between the two. They joke about their interactions resembling a date and imply a past romantic encounter. The conversation is light-hearted but also hints at a deeper connection between them.

Speaker 0 asks what you are here to talk about, says “Thank you very much,” and asks, “Any votes in the prime minister?”

Thank you, Mr. President. I have a few questions for you. Is there a new deal in the works? What's the latest regarding the Brexit deal? President Zelensky, can you share any updates on what has transpired recently? Also, I'm wondering, did you sign the minerals deal? Did you sign the minerals deal? Did you sign the deal?