reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The video shows a fire truck being repositioned multiple times, with bodies being dragged and manipulated like dummies. The bodies are placed on the front of the fire truck and in a police car, which is revealed to be part of a drill involving over 90 agencies. The event is portrayed as a staged scenario used to push an agenda. The bodies are clearly shown to be dummies, not real people. This reveals the truth behind the event being a drill, not a real emergency.

The hospital staff are heroic individuals who are working tirelessly, sacrificing sleep and food, and not knowing if their own families are safe. They are dedicated to saving lives and must be protected.

In the exchange, Speaker 0 questions whether the other is maintaining that there were no planes that hit the World Trade Center. Speaker 1 clarifies that this is not the claim they are making; rather, there is no significant wreckage from a large Boeing crash at any of the four events. This framing emphasizes a distinction between the presence of aircraft impact and the apparent absence of substantial debris. Speaker 0 then asks if Speaker 1 saw the videotape that others saw, prompting a response that encourages a frame-by-frame analysis of the South Tower. Speaker 1 asserts that what you will see is a “fake, a cartoon display,” arguing that an aluminum airplane cannot pass through a building like the South Tower as if it were thin air. In other words, Speaker 1 contends that the footage demonstrates a simulated or cartoon-like depiction rather than a real-time account of an aircraft penetrating the structure. Following this, Speaker 0 probes whether Speaker 1 is suggesting that the news media was involved in this fabrication, indicating a belief that media sources contributed to the apparent display. Speaker 1 affirms the suggestion by stating “Yes,” and notes that there was only one so-called real-time film, adding that “we don’t really understand how they did that.” This introduces a claim of media involvement and a mystery surrounding the production of the visible footage, implying manipulation or concealment of the true events. The dialogue ends with Speaker 1 mentioning that there are “video ex” (likely beginning to refer to video evidence or explanations) but the thought is cut off, leaving an incomplete reference to further material or evidence that would support the previous claims about the nature of the footage and the method by which it was produced.

They set us the fuck up. That's what they did. They set us they set up 64. Okay. Absolutely. And then they asked y'all to come to two hours later. They set us up. They needed everybody right away. No. Right away. They set us the fuck Here. You need water? No. Here. Here.

The transcript follows a group planning and enduring a 36-hour fast. Speaker 0 balks at the idea, wondering if anyone can handle it, while Speaker 1 urges that they’ll be fine and that the brain will cope with hunger later. Early on, they acknowledge depleted glucose from the last meal, noting the brain will likely “cancel everything when the hunger appears,” and that a day and a half without food is long. They admit they’ve run out of initial glucose and that things could get ugly, but both claim reserves: Speaker 1 says they have a glycogen reserve saved, and Speaker 0 shows theirs too, suggesting they can rely on this for a while longer. They check the boss’s stance, who remains unmoved in his position. Suddenly, hunger hits hard. Twenty hours in, hunger is crippling, and both feel the strain; Speaker 0 admits running out of glycogen, with Speaker 1 expressing fear for himself as well. In response, Speaker 0 mentions sending a portion of growth hormone from the pituitary gland to help them last longer, and Speaker 1 thanks the “P two” (pituitary) for the assistance. They note the pancreas is helping generate ketones from fat to produce energy, and they request glucagon, which Speaker 0 provides. As hunger subsides, ketones appear to relieve the energy crisis, though hunger still fluctuates. After about twenty hours, the speaker experiences extreme fatigue, while the brain remains "fresh as ever." A tingling sensation arises and they observe a cell issue: a “toxic protein” and a microbe described as “pubertal,” which seems to be part of an internal repair process. The process appears to be successful, with repair of the cell underway. By thirty-six hours, the boss’s forecast proves accurate: the situation has improved drastically, and they feel ready for a “sweet reset.” Speaker 0 reflects on not realizing how bad things were before and proclaims it the best thing that happened to them this decade. They celebrate the endurance with enthusiasm, declaring, “Congratulations, everybody. I told you we could do it, and here we are.” The scene ends with a plan to have a feast.

I returned to the building expecting to witness the chaos depicted in the news, but what I saw was different. There were no dying people, no coughing or blood. Curiosity led me to explore the clinical areas, although some were off-limits. When I reached the A&E department, I was shocked to find it completely empty. Despite the presence of many staff members, there were no patients. Conversations with my colleagues revealed that we were only operating at 60 to 70% capacity. This stark contrast between reality and what I had been told on the news left me deeply concerned.

Speaker 0 discusses an upcoming March, which they describe as the No Kings March, scheduled for March 28 across the United States. They state that this march will probably be the biggest mass march demonstration in American history and affirm that they will be in attendance along with the We steady state. They also note that they are partners with many organizations that span a wide range of political views and specific positions, emphasizing a broad coalition. The central message conveyed is that it is time to go out into the street and demonstrate the resolve of the American people to stay a democracy. Speaker 0 mentions attending a planning meeting for the No Kings rally on March 28 and adds, “there’s my plug again,” indicating personal involvement and enthusiasm, and notes that they left the planning meeting practically in tears. The speaker emphasizes the scale and significance of the effort by stating that thousands of people are involved in the planning of this event. The transcript ends with an incomplete line: “What’s,” suggesting there is more to the discussion that is not included in the excerpt.

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 address a viral video about Charlie’s chief of staff, Mikey, and explain why they are discussing it. - The video in question attacks Mikey, Charlie’s chief of staff, claiming based on a few seconds of clips that he allegedly has a nonchalant or calm reaction to Charlie’s murder. They describe this as a “extremely disgusting attack.” - Speaker 1 recounts what happened: they were at the scene when a shooting occurred. The loud crack is heard; they turn and see Charlie has been shot. They realize there is a shooter on the scene. They decide to get out of there rather than be shot, noting Charlie had a security team that leapt into action to get Charlie out. - Speaker 0 notes their own actions: he, too, considered getting into the car, but decided against it. He was ahead of Mikey as they left. He recalls a moment where he paused to assess the situation, then saw Mikey, who was profoundly freaked out. Mikey’s lip was quivering, and he said, “I need to call Erica,” then took his phone and began calling Erica. Speaker 0 also called his own mom, saying there had been a shooting and that he was okay. - They describe Mikey’s later actions: after the initial shock, Mikey took charge like a “general directing a battle,” coordinating hospital transport and information flow, and directing people where to go. When they learned Charlie had died, Mikey told them, “now none of you can say anything that you've heard because it is Erica is not going to hear about this from anyone except me.” - Speaker 2 asks if Mikey could be involved in a conspiracy to murder Charlie. Speaker 1 responds that such accusations are vile and describes how some people online fuel such narratives, comparing the mindset to getting a “high” from dangerous or provocative content. - The speakers emphasize Mikey’s heroic actions: Mikey was distressed but stepped up to direct people and communicate with Erica and others. Speaker 0 notes that he, too, was traumatized after learning of Charlie’s death and rushed to be with Erica and the team. - They address the specific allegation that Mikey was on the phone immediately during the incident; they state he was not on the phone but was taking social videos to share with their group chats. He would send updates to Charlie’s social media during the event while the crowd was changing, then, overwhelmed by the noise and shock, he put his fingers in his ears but his phone remained in his hand as he moved away. - They describe the scene as a cordoned-off area with a narrow gap that people used to exit, where Mikey walked briskly or ran as he processed the trauma and continued to direct actions. They reiterate Mikey “turned into a general on a field marshaling the troops.” - Speaker 1 closes by urging readers who propagate narratives attacking Mikey to reconsider, stating that such narratives are bad and gross and a choice that shouldn’t be made.

The speaker says that COVID began and the world suffered, but they believe they did a phenomenal job. They claim Operation Warp Speed was “one of the greatest military feats ever.” They reiterate that they “did a great job” and that the effort used “our military” and “a lot of people.”

They are interrupting our ability to conduct missions. A security guard at a hotel said the entire hotel was booked for federal employees, so people pulled out of a mountain had no place to go. The speaker slept in a car and smells like foot and death, as does the entire team. No one slept. They got done around 3 a.m. and were back in the air when the sun came up. The speaker wants people to understand how incredible the organization, Save Our Allies, is and all the work that the volunteers are doing. This is biblical level devastation and apocalyptic.

There are badge-wearing individuals who need to stay late and require food. They must balance processed people against a scanner to avoid being fired. A party of 15 people is present, but the single scanner is broken. The location will be open for the next 14 days.

The speaker works remotely and attends monthly happy hours. At the first happy hour, the speaker realized that everyone was either gay, lesbian, or in a toxic relationship. The speaker's office has a coloring wall due to boredom. They have been doing training and giving each other fake accomplishment letters. The speaker describes spending two weeks doing basic security checks, which they believe was a waste of time. The speaker says they are considered immigration enforcement, which should exempt them from certain things, but this hasn't been explicitly specified. The speaker expresses a lack of trust in the situation and describes feeling exhausted by constant meetings.

Units were arriving and being sent to work. For some, these would be their final moments. Then it happened.

Hey, how's it going? I'm just curious about the facilities back here. Are they being used? I noticed there aren't many workers coming in or out. We can't allow recording on-site, but we can answer questions. This area is for rapid response in emergencies, mainly for first responders. They stay here to rest between their duties. People think it's for housing illegals, but it's not. The workers are out doing their jobs during the day, which is why you might not see them. Thanks for the clarification. It's important to get accurate information instead of assumptions. Have a great day!

The speaker received messages, including from aircraft and squadron commanders, after posting a video. One squadron commander from North Carolina informed the speaker that they loaded a C-17 full of supplies for hurricane victims solely for a Kamala photo op. The C-17 was never sent. The speaker was contacted by an 06 who said the supplies were never intended to be sent.

The Pfizer COVID vaccine was not tested for its ability to stop the transmission of the virus before it entered the market. The speaker acknowledges that they had to work quickly to understand the situation and move at the speed of science.

Units were arriving and being sent to work. For some, these would be their final moments. And then it happened.

The speaker asserts that in their affidavit they list 19 points and describe spending 27 hours at the TCF Center. They state they are a mother with two children and two degrees, and claim they would never write an affidavit under oath just to write it, noting that you can go to prison for this. They explain that they was initially supposed to work at the Detroit Department of Elections building, an order by their manager, Nick Economagunas, whom they identify as part owner of Dominion. They claim they have emails confirming the arrangement and that they were trained on the adjudication and tabulation process. An email allegedly instructs them to park in a lot and be shuttled to what they call the “Chicago Warehouse.” The speaker asserts that there was illegal activity at that location, stating that there are pictures of people carrying ballots out of the place and vans full of ballots leaving. Around 4:30 AM, they say there was an announcement that a new shipment of ballots was arriving, and that these boxes of ballots were brought in by “mister Baxter” from the rear of the room. They personally witnessed Mr. Baxter carrying boxes from the rear basement of the TCF Center to the tables. They describe each box as containing approximately 600 ballots, and note that the tables were 10-foot tables and about seven tables in total, all full of boxes of ballots. They estimate that about 50,000 ballots were brought in, clarifying that not all ballots were necessarily from the rear entrance, but that there were far more ballots than the ones brought in from the rear entrance. They recount the timeline as starting at 6 AM, with shipments arriving around 4:30–5 AM, and three rounds of activity earlier in the night—from around 10 PM to 1 AM and 1 AM to 4 AM—followed by the arrival of the 4:30 AM boxes. With the shift change, most volunteers, who had expected to be there from 10 PM to 5 AM, left at 5 AM, leaving the speaker to stay. The shift change occurred, and at 6 AM, Baxter and his management team resumed on the microphone. They allegedly stated, “this is what democracy is is supposed to look like,” and the whole room cheered in response to the new shift.

Social media and journalism can misrepresent the circumstances surrounding an event, and the post seen does not depict the entire incident. What often happens is that social media and mainstream media commentary distort content, which makes it harder to thoroughly investigate the activity and enforce the law. A single post or coverage item can present one side of the story without context, leading to people rushing to conclusions and the narrative “growing legs” that the investigation then has to manage. Speaker 1 asked where the nearest officers were. Speaker 0 answered that in the central business section they were working; both were in vehicles and had to maneuver through traffic. Regarding what exactly was distorted, Speaker 0 explained that social media irresponsibility frequently shows one side of the equation without factual context, and then people run with that, causing the issue to grow larger and become more difficult to manage as part of the investigation.

Jackie Pick, speaking as a volunteer and attorney not acting as counsel in this case, presented what she said is evidence from State Farm Arena in Fulton County concerning fraud or misrepresentation. She described the scene as a single large room where absentee and military ballots are tabulated on election day, with videotape from morning through close of polls. She stated that two Republican field organizers were sent as observers but were not allowed to observe meaningfully. They were “roped off with the press” in a roped-off area. She explained the timeline: the observers were to arrive around 08:00 to watch the tabulation of absentee and military ballots; about 10:00, a person working the polls allegedly told everyone in the room to leave because they were going to stop counting and would return at 08:30 in the morning. At approximately 10:00, workers remained, and the press and Republican observers left, but four people stayed behind and continued counting and tabulating well into the night, until about 10:25–10:30. The observers allegedly learned from a news crew that counting had continued after they had been told to leave. The observers returned to State Farm Arena around 01:00 in the morning and confirmed that people had left in contravention of the supervisors’ instructions. The video frames show the room becoming a ghost town between 10:25 and 10:37 as those who stayed behind were described as continuing work after the observers and press had left. The four people who remained behind were described as the lady in purple, two women in yellow (near the scanners), and the woman with blonde braids who had earlier instructed everyone to leave and stop counting. Pick asserted these four stayed behind to operate scanners once the area was clear of witnesses. She directed attention to the act of pulling ballots out from underneath a table, with the same blonde-braided woman having placed a table at 08:22 a.m. The video allegedly shows four suitcases of ballots being moved from under the table, prompting questions about the origin and chain of custody of those ballots, and why counting occurred only when the room was unsupervised. Her team calculated the possible volume: with three scanners processing about 3,000 ballots per hour over two hours, roughly 18,000 ballots could have been scanned during that unsupervised period. They noted six people involved in moving ballots in and out (the four workers plus two others), suggesting a prolonged period of unsupervised tabulation until about 12:55 a.m., after which the witnesses left again. The witnesses say counting resumed around five minutes before their return around 01:40–01:45. During the hearing, respondents questioned whether a water leak or water main break occurred and whether it affected operations; officials described conflicting accounts, with some asserting the leak did not disrupt work and others noting a toilet leak in some testimony. There were claims that a monitor was on-site throughout the process, which Fulton County officials reportedly disputed, stating the video had not been viewed by all parties. Additional questions from senators covered: who operates the cameras (the State Farm Arena) and whether the footage is secured and accessible; whether the scanners maintain real-time logs; and whether the video presents new information not previously reviewed by election authorities. The presenter emphasized the need for further hours of review to fully assess the frames and warrants.

They set us up. They really did. They needed everyone right away, and it felt like a setup. Did you need water? Here, take this.

It's strange, this project used to have people working on it constantly, every single day. Now, there's absolutely no one here. I'm starting to wonder if it will ever be completed at all.

Thousands of people are gathered at the border, causing a significant impact on the United States. The media only shows the surface, but the situation is much more dire. A recent flight with Texas DPS revealed that agents were unavailable to respond to individuals located miles away from the main gathering. The border system is completely broken, and the truth is not being told. Each bump on the ground represents a person, and there were 12,000 encounters today.

During the pandemic, many operating rooms were closed, leaving a surplus of staff. Nurses were often assigned to less critical tasks like testing and surveillance, which contradicted the perception of them being overworked. The staff had more free time than ever before, as seen in videos of them dancing and goofing around. However, the public was not given an accurate picture of the situation. Nurses were given the option to resign without negative consequences, which many younger nurses chose to do to protect their future in the profession. This information was not properly conveyed, leading to misunderstandings about the healthcare system's losses.