TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

The speaker contends that the US Navy and the IEEE took control of safety determinations based entirely on short term heating or short term effects and did not want to address long term effects of radiation. They allegedly funded work on thermal effects in relation to radio frequency radiation, screened the literature, retained for reviews, captured the risk assessment process, and promoted their views because the IEEE has 400,000 members worldwide. They claim these groups promoted their views with politicians and the public and used false arguments. The speaker states, “this radiation is non ionizing. So consequently, it can be dangerous,” but asserts, “the body is permanently ionized,” and maintains this argument is moot. They also say, “this radiation is too weak to heat up molecules as they do in the microwave oven,” but according to the speaker, “the targets are not the molecules, they are the electrons and the protons that are inevitable in living systems.” According to the speaker, industry designed standards of exposure with averaging times of six or thirty minutes and average time over space of one to 10 grams, which are cited as signs of not going into biology at all because these parameters ignore biology generally. The speaker notes that exposures to the head are 20 times higher than to the body, and claims this was done by industry to accommodate the commercialization of cell phones. In 1992, ICNER, which is the International Commission on Non ionizing Radiation Protection, was installed by industry to maintain their restricted view that electromagnetic radiation acts on people only through heat. The speaker also states that ICNERP got the support of the World Health Organization.

To switch a phone from 5G to 4G, go to settings, then cellular data, and change the setting from 5G to LTE or 4G. According to the speaker, 5G is 300 times stronger than 4G and caused the 2020 pandemic. The speaker claims there are zero long-term studies of 5G. A senator questioned industry representatives about funding for 5G studies and was told there are no active industry-backed studies. The speaker suggests that people are the study and advises against using new technologies like AirPods and smartwatches. The speaker claims 5G is tested on plastic dummies and implies it is unsafe for humans.

Speaker 0 describes smart meters in the context of a book, showing a plant and a smart meter, and notes that “that side's all cooked.” They claim that this illustrates what “they don’t tell people.” The speaker asserts that a smart meter catches fire and that a utility company denies homeowner damage claims, with insurance not covering fires. They reference “all these fires” and say there have been fires across the country linked to smart meters. They question how safety is tested, claiming that “this is a plastic dummy” and “that’s a phone” used to demonstrate safety, followed by the statement “And then what about plants exposed to Wi Fi? Look at this. No Wi Fi.” The speaker contrasts the apparent demonstration with alleged real-world risk to plants from wireless technology. The speaker adds a claim about the Navy, stating that it “knew 5,000 studies on the dangers of wireless technology.” They offer an example as “one good one” and connect Wi-Fi to thyroid issues, asserting “Thyroid issues, Wi Fi.”

The speaker demonstrates the levels of electromagnetic radiation emitted by various devices. They show that when the microwave is off, there is minimal radiation. However, when it is turned on, the levels increase significantly. They compare the radiation levels from using mobile data and Wi-Fi to being close to a microwave oven. The speaker also measures the radiation levels inside a car and finds that it is consistently high. They mention experiencing a headache after a test drive, attributing it to the constant exposure to radiation from mobile phones.

To switch from 5G to 4G, go to settings, then cellular data, and change the setting from 5G to LTE or 4G. According to the speaker, 5G is 300 times stronger than 4G and caused the 2020 pandemic. The speaker claims switching to 4G will alleviate headaches, improve sense of smell, and stop dizziness, hair loss, and heart palpitations. The speaker asserts there are zero long-term studies on 5G. A senator asked if there were any long-term studies of 5G before its rollout, and was told there are no industry-backed studies currently. The speaker concludes that the public is the study, and avoids new technologies like AirPods and smartwatches, because they believe the safety testing is inadequate.

Speaker 0 explains how to switch from 5G to LTE: Settings, then cellular data, five g plus or five g, turn that to LTE or four g; it takes less than five seconds. He claims, "you'll start feeling better, you won't have headaches, you'll probably get your sense of smell better, you won't be dizzy anymore, have your hair falling out anymore and suffering from heart palpitations because five gs is 300 times stronger than four g, and that's what caused the pandemic of twenty twenty." "But they're not gonna tell you that because that gets censored." He adds, "there are zero long term studies of five g. Zero." There were people who testified in front of Congress asking, "do you have any long term studies of five g before you roll this out?" Speaker 1: "There are no industry back studies to my knowledge right now." "Happy to visit with you as to what opportunities you think there needs to be more studies, and we're always for more science." "We also rely on what the scientists tell us." Speaker 0: "So essentially, the answer to my question, how much money? Zero." Speaker 1: "Let me follow-up with you, senator. To my knowledge, there's no active studies being backed by industry today." Speaker 0: "So guess who's the study? You. That's why I don't use any of the new stuff. That's why I don't use AirPods and smartwatches and all the other stuff because you don't know what you're putting into your body or doing to your body. That's for sure." Speaker 0: "And they're gonna sell it as safe because they tested it on a plastic dummy. So you gotta ask yourself, do you wanna be the plastic dummy? I don't want to. That's for sure."

The speaker describes a legal victory, stating that they won a major suit against the Federal Communications Commission in the court of appeals for lying to the public about cell phone radiation and cell phone safety. He claims that, as a result, the FCC must go back and redo all of its regulations concerning cell phones. He presents this as a corrective action prompted by the truth about radiation and safety, implying that prior rules were incorrect or misleading. Moving to specific cautions, he asserts that if you have a child, you should never let the child put a cell phone near the head, and you should not let the phone be carried in a front pocket. He adds that, if the user is a girl, you should not allow the cell phone to be carried in a breast pocket. He further warns against carrying the device anywhere near the ovaries. He emphasizes that the farther the cell phone is from the head when you are talking, the better off you are, framing distance as a key factor in reducing exposure. The speaker reinforces his position by claiming a vast body of scientific support, stating that there are tens of thousands of studies that show the really extreme dangers of cell phone radiation. He contends that these dangers are not receiving adequate attention from the public. He notes that many children sleep with a cell phone right next to their heads, sometimes on the bed, and he urges listeners not to allow this practice. He asserts that this proximity at night is a common and troubling habit that increases exposure. Finally, he offers a practical nighttime precaution, suggesting that you should try to get the phone away from children at night so they can obtain eight hours of sleep without the device near them. He frames this as an important safety measure, implying that reducing overnight exposure is a simple and essential step. Throughout, the overall message is presented as a safety-focused stance grounded in legal action and cited studies, urging immediate adherence to the proximity and placement guidelines to minimize cell phone radiation exposure.

The speaker claims to have won a suit in the court of appeals against the FCC, alleging the agency lied to the public about cell phone radiation and safety, and asserts that the FCC must redo its regulations on cell phones. He asserts that if you have a child, you should never let the child put a cell phone near the head and should avoid carrying it in front pockets; for girls, he says not to carry the phone in the breast pocket and to keep it away from ovaries. He emphasizes that the farther the cell phone is from the head during a call, the better. He asserts, “there are tens of thousands of studies” showing the extreme dangers of cell phone radiation and claims that people are not paying attention. He notes that many children sleep with a cell phone right next to their heads, sometimes on the bed, and he advises against that. He recommends removing the cell phone at night so that children can get eight hours without it and stresses that this is really important.

Speaker 0, Speaker 1, and Speaker 2 discuss headphones and potential thyroid health concerns. They note they no longer wear Bluetooth and now prefer wired headphones; Speaker 0 says they use wired headphones plugged into the phone, and they are “just Amazon products. Nothing’s fancy, and they work just as well.” Speaker 1 expresses relief that Speaker 0 moved away from wireless, mentioning that they had shared information for years and kept sending content until Speaker 0 switched. Speaker 2 introduces a shift in how people view wireless headphones. They acknowledge that wireless is convenient, but say it’s moving from outside the Overton window toward inside it. They reference a recent analysis (epidemiology) showing a strong or significant association between Bluetooth headphone use (AirPods, Beats, wireless) and an increased incidence of thyroid nodules, noting this applies to both men and women. They describe the thyroid as a master gland and explain that thyroid nodules can be precancerous. They emphasize proximity to a hormonally sensitive gland and RF EMF exposure from a device worn near the neck, asserting they can measure RF with a meter and that earbuds emit RF energy. They compare the RF exposure to that of microwaves, stating the measurement units are microwatts per meter squared and that the RF band of Bluetooth is essentially the same as that of a microwave. They describe the headphones as “a small microwave in your head” for hours a day and note that readings can be obtained by placing the RF meter near a microwave. Speaker 1 agrees with caution, saying they won’t put a cell phone to their ear and questions why anyone would wear earbuds all day, feeling “spidery” about it. Speaker 0 reports returning to wired setups (Apple 1/1Point0) and values conversation without wireless interference, calling it nostalgic and safer long term. Speaker 1 discusses reasons for pushback: tradition, fashion, or fear of changing habits. They mention they once bought olive-colored Apple headphones as a fashion statement and acknowledge that appearance can distract from the health discussion. Speaker 0 clarifies they aren’t “tin hat” about everything but notes that people who sounded alarms often get vindicated later. They prefer alternatives if there’s even a slight chance of risk. Speaker 1 shares a light parenting anecdote: their five-year-old confessed briefly wearing wired headphones for five minutes, illustrating the challenge of managing kids’ exposure. They reflect on broader concerns about kids, screen time, and technology exposure, referencing a recent guest’s emphasis on limiting screen time. Speaker 0 ends with a Casino-like caution: if there’s a better alternative that works as well, why take the chance?

Speaker 0 argues that tin foil hats actually work and demonstrates how a small amount of aluminum foil can reduce RF electromagnetic fields (RFEMF) from a WiFi router. He shows a RFEMF meter reading standing a few feet away from the router, noting measurements between 100 and 200 microwatts per square meter. As he moves right up to the WiFi router, the reading climbs to over a million, sometimes 2,000,000 microwatts per square meter. He states that generally you want to be working and living in an environment that's less than a 100 or 200 microwatts per square meter. He shares that when he is sitting ten to fifteen feet away, the reading is 18,000 to 20,000 microwatts per square meter. He asserts that this is not an environment he wants to be working in all day. Mentioning that there is a lot of debate about RFEMF and its harm to humans, he says there are a significant number of studies suggesting that RFEMF from a WiFi router or your phone can affect human biology negatively. The proposed solution is to wrap the router with aluminum foil. He states, “Literally just wrap this around the WiFi router, and now you're officially a conspiracy theorist. It's modern art,” yet demonstrates the result. After wrapping around the router, the reading between 500 and 1,000 microwatts per square meter is observed, representing a 10- to 20-fold reduction. He notes that right before wrapping, the reading was 100,000 microwatts per square meter, and after wrapping it, the reading is five to 7,000 microwatts per square meter just in front of the router. He emphasizes that the router remains still very high right at the device, but that the levels are significantly lower throughout the rest of the house. He concludes by stating, “Tinfoil hats work. 5¢ of tinfoil on your WiFi router, something that's in every home, can significantly decrease your exposure throughout the day while you're working.” He ends by encouraging viewers to send this to somebody they know who works very close to a WiFi router.

In the iPhone settings, under legal and regulatory, there is a warning about radio frequency radiation. The device was tested at a distance from the body, so it should not be placed near the head, in a bra, pocket, waistband, or back pocket. There has been a rise in colon, rectal, and breast cancers. To minimize exposure, it is recommended to use hands-free options like speakerphone.

Checklist for summary approach: - Identify and preserve the core claims about cell phone radiation effects on animals. - Retain the quantitative detail: “20 times below the legal safety limit” and the mention of a “weaker form.” - Capture the comparison between weaker exposure and stronger levels (5G/4G) and the claimed effects. - Report the specific harms cited: brain damage, neurodevelopmental issues, DNA damage in stem cells. - Include the assertion that studies not funded by big tech/cellular industry report deleterious effects (oxidative stress, DNA damage, cancer, neurological injuries, blood abnormalities). - Avoid adding commentary, evaluation, or new information not in the transcript. - Translate to English if needed and preserve exact phrases where possible. Subjected rats to to cell phone radiation, like normal cell phone radiation, not four g, five g, even a weaker form. They exposed them at 20 times below the legal safety limit, and it caused brain damage and neurodevelopmental issues in these rats. Like, it was causing DNA damage in stem cells. So, I mean, it's just it just decimates the number what you Just said. 20 times below the legal limit, but you were saying this wasn't even five g. This was a weaker a weaker signal, and it was doing that. So what is the five g doing? What are the stronger levels doing? Yeah. The stronger levels are absolutely terrible. Every time they test the biological effects of five g, four g, and they're not funded by big tech and big cellular industry, they always find extremely deleterious biological effects, including oxidative stress, including DNA damage, cancer, neurological injuries, blood abnormalities. Right? All these things. So it's not good for any any bodily system.

The speaker expresses strong concern about five Gs towers, suggesting their worry is high (even implying a scale up to nine or ten). They state that calling it “five Gs” is a misnomer because it doesn’t tell you what’s wrong with EMFs. EMFs are bad depending on the pulse rates and the wavelengths, and some of them are very bad. They note that in Europe, regulations are an order of magnitude lower than what is allowed here. There are literally over 10,000 studies that document a number of ill effects, including cancer and tumor growth.

Telstra advises using hands-free devices to keep mobile phones away from the head and body because they emit pulsed microwave radiation. Phones search for a signal approximately 900 times a minute. Answering a call by putting the phone to your head is the worst time to do so, as the phone goes to max power. Radiation exposure occurs when phones are kept in pockets. Consumer Reports recommends against keeping phones in pockets, stating that phones tested in pockets would exceed as-tested exposure guidelines. Keeping the phone in your pocket will exceed the as tested exposure guidelines.

Speaker 0 describes higher frequencies as potentially impacting bees and insects because the wave size can resonate with insect size, leading to greater absorption. He shows a study with heat-map images of higher frequencies on the honeybee, noting five insects were examined and bees at different life stages were tested; higher frequencies resonated with the bees and were more highly absorbed, potentially causing biochemical changes that can affect bee behavior. He notes other studies on their website showing impacts to honey production and bee reproduction, including cases where bees did not return to a hive when wireless radiation was near it. Speaker 1 states, “For decades, there has been irrefutable evidence that electromagnetic waves have an influence both thermally and non thermally on living beings, including people.” Speaker 2 adds that five g has triggered irrational fears, but experts are concerned, and Daniel Favre is among hundreds of scientists who think precautionary steps should be taken. Favre signed appeals to the United Nations and European Union asking for the health effects of it to be reassessed. Danielle has been looking into the impact of electromagnetic fields on honeybees for years. Speaker 1 elaborates: in a practical setup, a cell phone emits the waves while another phone receives the waves, and a device records the sound of the colony in the beehive via a microphone under the hive. The waveform thickening indicates greater colony sound intensity; when phones are active, the colony is disturbed, and once the phone is off, the colony returns to normal noise. Speaker 2 emphasizes that implementing five g safely for people and the environment requires more time for independent research and for digesting information from thousands of published papers, citing Enrico Stura, an electronic engineer specializing in molecular biophysics. Speaker 1 adds that “The electromagnetic waves produced by personal telecommunication systems during reasonable periods of time lead to demonstrable and proven DNA damages.” Speaker 0 references a study on radio frequency radiation injuries around mobile phone base stations, conducted as a field study for years, observing trees in line of sight of cell antennas showing damage that led to felled trees over time. He notes photographs showing the antenna and the crown fitting, and mentions studies on impacts to plants, stressing the broader concern about widespread antennas in Montgomery County, the United States, and the world.

So when I travel, I bring my EMF reader with me. Notice that zero point zero. And I'm in a building, and there's people above me. But when you unplug everything, that's what happens. When I had this on, and it was pinging like crazy, and I couldn't figure out where the router was. What I noticed was that phone was plugged in. That's a wireless phone. And look at this. The router was below the bed. So this was going off the charts because they hid the router underneath the bed. So while people are sleeping and they're like, oh, I can't figure out why I didn't get a good night sleep. We got Wi Fi pinging in your place. When you put this closer to here, you see how that's starting to increase? Because the RFs that are toxic can run off of the wires. So it's important

In this video, the speaker shows how to access a menu on an iPhone to find information about radiofrequency radiation exposure. The speaker warns against placing the device close to the body, such as near the head, in a bra, pocket, or waistband, due to potential health risks. They mention the increasing rates of colon, rectal, and breast cancers. The speaker advises using a hands-free option, like a speakerphone, to minimize exposure. These are the main points discussed in the video.

- "We have our own government." - "The US National Toxicology Program completed a $30,000,000 study that concluded cell phones cause cancer and DNA damage." - "Italy's Ramazzini Institute completed another study that shows from cell towers cancers, DNA damage, and more." - "So it doesn't matter where these signals are emanating from." - "The World Health Organization in 2011 said it doesn't matter where it comes from." - "All of this man made radiofrequency back in 2011 was classified as a group two b possible human carcinogen." - "What was missing back in 2011 were these animal studies that the National Toxicology Program and the Ramazzini Institute and others have completed that show clear evidence of cancer." - "Now clear evidence is the top of five categories that can be assigned." - "That should have triggered public policy to inform all the parents and to protect us, but it didn't."

My Wi-Fi router emits harmful radiation, with levels reaching 2,500,000 microwatts per meter squared when turned on. This can cause cancer and neurological issues. To reduce exposure, stay at least 10 feet away from the router. At 20 feet away, levels drop to 1,000 microwatts per meter squared. The safe zone is below 10 microwatts per meter squared.

"This is a small sample of uranium." "five g radiation is nonionizing radiation and has a wavelength in the millimeter range, very close to what microwave range frequencies just like Wi Fi and microwave ovens give off." "So technically, the main damage we need to worry about with five g is if it's giving enough power to heat your body up like in a microwave." "Let's see how strong the signal is from my phone." "Woah. 89." "you actually get way more radiation holding your phone to your head than being near a tower." "it's orders of magnitude lower than the amount that could cause heating to your body." "the battery warming up in your phone is gonna cause more heating on your body than the five g radiation is." "Aren't you glad cell phones don't use uranium?"

Speaker 0 urges switching from five g to four g: "Takes less than five seconds. I guarantee you'll start feeling better." He asserts benefits and adds: "You won't have headaches. You won't be dizzy anymore. Have your hair falling out anymore and suffering from heart palpitations because five g is 300 times stronger than four g, and that's what caused the pandemic of twenty twenty." He states: "there are zero long term studies of five g. Zero." He asks: "There were people who testified in front of congress and asked them, do you have any long term studies of five g before you roll this out?" Speaker 1 replies: "There are no industry back studies to my knowledge right now. Happy to visit with you... we're always for more science. We also rely on what the scientists tell us." Speaker 0: "So essentially, the answer to my question, how much money? Zero." Speaker 1: "No active studies being backed by industry today." Speaker 0 concludes: "So guess who's the study? You. That's why I don't use any of the new stuff... AirPods and smartwatches..."

The speaker introduces antennasearch.com to find cell phone towers near homes and suggests switching cell phones to LTE instead of 5G to boycott a system that is allegedly poisoning people. The speaker claims safety tests are inadequate and that the rapid rollout of 5G since 2020 is causing radio wave sickness, which was allegedly removed from medical books in the 1920s. Symptoms of radio wave sickness purportedly include fevers, chills, shortness of breath, fatigue, headaches, loss of smell, insomnia, pain in the chest, dizziness, muscle pain, hypertension, strokes, and thyroid issues. The speaker states that cell phone tower companies are immune to lawsuits and references a 1971 US Navy document that supposedly acknowledged the damages of this technology. The speaker eliminated WiFi, Bluetooth, and smart meters and now uses a wired internet connection.

Today’s discussion centers on Elon Musk and the technocrat, claiming that "Matt from Cultivate LV lacks medical credentials on five g, and there's no link of any dangers of five g or WiFi," and that AI has been programmed to say this. It references "the studies done by the US Navy in 1971 of 2,000 studies on the biological responses to radio frequencies, five gs wireless, and microwave radiation." It lists side effects: "impotence, anxiety, lack of concentration, dizziness, hallucinations, sleepiness, insomnia, restlessness, chest pain, no side effects," plus "hair loss." It notes that in 1996, "Bill Clinton signs an act to protect cell phone towers from lawsuits," and claims "No dangers," including that "insurance companies don't cover cell phone companies." It adds that "cell phone safety testing is done on a plastic dummy" and that "The safety standard in The US, Canada, and Australia ... is off the charts, while in other countries, actually very low." It links "the rollout of five g" to the "root cause of the pandemic" and ends with "Here you go."

"Never ever ever put a cell phone on your ear." "Tell your kids. I'm gonna prove it to you and to them." "This right here is measuring." "So we're at point two, point six. Now watch it when it comes closer. 28, 33, 29, 39." "Do you see the difference?" "What was that?" ""30 times the amount of radiation going into my head." "Always use speakerphone." "Make sure your kids see this because they're the biggest offenders." "Oh, and don't put it back in your pocket." "If you put it on your body, always have it on airplane mode."

There have been numerous studies since the 1930s on the dangers of microwave radiation, with 5G testing conducted in the 1970s. The speaker believes that microwave radiation is extremely dangerous and that we should eliminate it. They suggest using fiber optics instead, which is safer and provides the same benefits. Another concern is that microwave radiation disrupts our frequencies, which should be in sync with those of the Earth and the universe. The second speaker advises against using lead paint and recommends setting up optic lines to avoid Wi-Fi. They claim that Wi-Fi is a weapon and that various electrical devices, such as smart meters, stoves, microwaves, smartphones, and computers, can negatively impact sleep and cause headaches.