TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

- Speaker 0 apologized in 2016 for a promise about 1000 euros, stating that was a mistake and clarifying that it is not about Ukraine joining the European Union; they are against that as well. - On policy positions, Speaker 0 says: there should not be changes to mortgage interest deduction; they are not in favor of increasing the deductible; they are investing half a billion in the development of alternative energy, with a caveat about wind turbines, noting that those wind turbines operate on subsidies and “do not operate on wind.” - Speaker 1 recalls a statement from nine years ago about a street worker who works 40 years and can retire at 65, noting that nothing of that has been seen in recent years. Speaker 0 counters with “five years said, right?” to confirm the timeline. - Speaker 0 references a past claim about someone being under oath, saying that if it involved political motives, the law would be set aside. They remark not to recall a speech about “group immunity,” and state they have not heard such a speech. - The discussion moves to a person not being in service of the VVD; they state she does not work for the VVD, has no VVD parliamentary pass, and that Speaker 0 had lied about the matter being about Omtzigt. - Speaker 0 asserts that they did so to the best of their knowledge, admitting there was no memo that had been requested by the informant or informally requested; they did not have that memory and could not reconstruct what was discussed in 2015. They acknowledge uncertainty about what exactly was on the table in 2015 and admit they cannot precisely reconstruct those details. - They mention a second example and reference someone named Caroline, then question whether it is odd that officials would be aware of something and the other person would not be informed. They ask if this was four years ago, saying they would not know. They conclude by saying they have misremembered this in hindsight and express sincere regret.

I apologize for the harm caused to Alex Turck and his loved ones, as well as letting down the people of San Francisco. I am committed to regaining their trust and will work hard to run the city effectively. I also apologize to my administration, staff, friends, and family for my actions.

I posted a picture with Mr. Grosskreutz on Facebook, but the caption about him regretting not killing someone was not true. I made the post due to threats I received online and to defend my friend. I apologize for the false statement.

I apologize for the recent events. I deeply regret hurting Alex Turck, his loved ones, and the people of San Francisco. I am committed to rebuilding trust and working hard to fulfill my duties as mayor. I also apologize to my administration, staff, friends, and family for my actions.

I don't understand why the committee skipped over 30 years of my career and focused on a past incident from graduate school. We should be looking at the last three and a half years because people were killed in a terrorist act. The special agent found that I was involved and I apologize for lying to the committee. I was fired for it.

Speaker 1 recalls asking someone, presumably a friend, about something. The friend responded that he was Israeli and would do certain things for his country. Speaker 0 notes that this got the person into big trouble. Speaker 1 says he accepted the answer, almost.

The speaker is asked about the appropriateness of his son's work in China and Ukraine. He denies any wrongdoing, stating that he carried out his job impeccably and that no one found anything out of line. He also mentions that the person who got in trouble in Ukraine was trying to bribe the government to say something negative about him, which never happened. He denies his son making money from China and dismisses the claim that his son received a large payment from a Ukrainian company. He concludes by stating that there is no basis for any wrongdoing in Ukraine.

Everything that has been heard and read is true, and the speaker is deeply sorry. They hurt Alex Turk, his friends, and family, which they regret. The speaker also apologizes to the people of San Francisco for letting them down, and commits to restoring their trust and confidence. They will work hard to ensure the city's business is handled appropriately. A personal apology is extended to everyone in the administration, staff, friends, and family members.

The speaker is asked to explain a discrepancy between their claim of being in Hong Kong during the Tiananmen Square protests in the spring of 1989 and reports that they didn't travel to Asia until August of that year. The speaker says they grew up in rural Nebraska, joined the National Guard at 17, and used the GI Bill to become a teacher. In the summer of 1989, they traveled to China and started a program taking basketball teams, baseball teams, and dancers back and forth to China to learn. They say their community knows who they are and that they have poured their heart into the community, while acknowledging they are not perfect. They claim to have been a bipartisan member of Congress and were elected governor twice. They admit to sometimes getting caught up in rhetoric. They say the experience in China made a difference in their life and that Donald Trump should have come on one of those trips. When asked again about the discrepancy, the speaker says they misspoke and were in Hong Kong and China during the democracy protest.

The speaker learned about an incident involving their colleague, Vlad Lander, a government controller, and found the video of it shocking. The speaker felt the need to come and check on Lander's whereabouts and intervene. According to the speaker, Vlad Lander faces no charges, as they have been dropped, and he is now a free man.

I apologize for the recent events and the hurt I have caused to Alex Turck, his loved ones, the people of San Francisco, and my administration. I am committed to regaining trust and will work hard to fulfill my duties as mayor. I am deeply sorry to my staff, friends, and family for my actions.

Speaker 0 says he went and hassled asked straightforward questions to Ted Cruz, describing Cruz as a sitting senator who was “serving for Israel by his own description,” and notes he isn’t targeting Marjorie Taylor Greene (MTG) because she’s “the most sincere.” He questions why not go after Cruz. Speaker 1 recalls being a friend of MTG; she spoke at his conference, then “the day after, she pretended like she didn't know me,” describing a history that began in 2022. He explains views evolve as people interact with reality and as the reality of self changes, adding that now “everyone agrees with me,” and he would forgive hostility. He says he doesn’t know what MTG’s new views are, noting she’s come around on Israel “this year,” whereas he has spoken on the issue for ten years. He characterizes the past as “ BS” and claims he was treated as if he didn’t exist, canceled for ten years for discussing these topics, particularly during a time of intense censorship. Speaker 1 mentions MTG fired one of his staffers because someone found out a groiper was working in her office, and that person’s life was ruined; MTG allegedly knew exactly what the conference was, yet she pretended not to. He says the issue isn’t personal with MTG, but argues the past disagreement was because she was “on the other team.” Speaker 0 counters that many people were on different sides in the past and suggests the question is bigger than themselves, aiming to restore America for future generations. Speaker 0 adds a personal note: if Dave Rubin called to apologize for calling him “Hitler,” he would consider it meaningful, and he sees legitimate questions to consider. He emphasizes sincerity as central, stating he believes sincerity shows when someone’s heart is pure, and that Joe Kent appeared sincere despite not agreeing on everything, which led Speaker 0 to think Kent was a good person. However, Speaker 0 says Kent was later discredited as being a CIA officer (or contractor), which contradicted their impression, and he recalls showing each other a badge during a mutual suspicion moment. Speaker 1 recalls being disavowed by MTG for his views on Israel and criticized for talking about white people and Christianity, and notes that he worked with Blumenthal on an article while Speaker 0 had called him on the phone. Speaker 0 reflects that the exchange felt “inside baseball” and insists he was seeking a sincere politician, someone brave, regardless of full agreement. He cites Joe Kent as an example of sincerity despite disagreements, and recounts being surprised by Speaker 1’s later revelation that Kent’s CIA association changed his view of Kent.

Moneypenny, who identifies as British, explains she does not profess to understand the American legal system and notes the British system is harsh. She says that if a high-ranking, medal-awarded UK military figure who used to be a jet pilot and who worked in UK military intelligence came forward with evidence of a misdemeanor involving the death of many people, that matter would be investigated. She says she is stuck and wants to appeal to Pam Bondi and possibly Cash Patel. She describes a US military member who used to be a pilot, who worked in sensitive intelligence, who had visited the Diego Garcia Military Base, and who had a level of clearance allowing him to explore the base, and who was aware of the Black Navy and operations requiring senior sign-in. To her, that individual sounds like someone who would be taken seriously. She questions why information from someone of that caliber who has spoken out, who is recorded speaking out, who has given corroborating evidence and named others, and who can tell where a seven seventy-seven airliner with two hundred thirty-nine souls on board went and how the operation took place, down to the mechanics and the people involved, is not being taken seriously or investigated. She frames this as murder. She notes there are two hundred thirty-nine people on board and thousands of friends, family, and others who have dedicated time to examining the case over the past eleven years, including herself. She mentions videos that potentially reveal some information, but Ashton Forbes, who holds those videos, has been given letters from the American military or American department stating that, in matters of national security, they cannot confirm any of the detail. She reiterates that this decorated military veteran, a former jet pilot who flew into Diego Garcia, who served in Iraq, and who has performed impressive military work for the United States, has spoken out and is on record. She says she will send the video and asks why nothing is being done and why nobody is investigating. She says she does not understand how the United States can overlook this, and she expresses anger on behalf of all those people aboard and their friends and families, many of whom are Chinese and Malaysian. She demands that something be done about this. She adds that she is a nobody, and that she will put this on social media and wait for a bloody good explanation as to why nobody is taking this seriously, because she considers it inhumane. She hopes the Trump administration, among others, would not allow something inhumane to occur, and she ends by expressing that she hopes others agree.

My colleagues and family on the frontline are facing heightened tensions due to recent events. It's crucial to handle tempers carefully. There's confusion between two separate cases, leading to misunderstandings. Thank you to Kevin Hurley, a former detective chief superintendent, for sharing his insights.

I apologize for recording a video message that was shown at a partisan gathering. It was a mistake and I should not have done it. As the Speaker, I understand that I am human and can make errors. However, I am committed to doing better. I will implement a stricter communication protocol and seek guidance from parliamentary experts to prevent this from happening again. Respect for people, decorum, and the institution of Parliament are important to me. I am still learning in this role.

I find the case of Detective Bruce intriguing from a professional perspective as a former police officer. He is charged with launching an unauthorized investigation, which is something I have never encountered in my 45 years in law enforcement. During my 15 years with the Toronto Police, I never sought permission to investigate; I would request assistance or resources, but not permission. Law enforcement officers are designed to operate independently under the law and their oath of office. This structure is in place to prevent outside influences from interfering with police work.

In a recent incident at a bar in Ireland, I got into a fight with another man. I admit that I was in the wrong and that he deserved to enjoy his time without it ending that way. I tried to make amends back then, but it doesn't matter because I take full responsibility for my actions. I owe it to my family, my trainers, and my supporters to own up to my mistake. This incident goes against why I got into martial arts, which was to defend against such situations. It hurts me deeply as a young martial artist, but I'm here to face the consequences and move forward.

My family members are on the frontline dealing with recent events. It's crucial to be cautious with tempers high. People are conflating different cases, causing confusion. Thank you, Kevin Hurley, former detective chief superintendent.

The speaker asks about being called a "knucklehead" by JD Vance, specifically regarding a misrepresentation about being in Hong Kong during the Tiananmen Square unrest. The speaker questions if this is more than just being a "knucklehead" and raises the issue of trustworthiness. The respondent says people know who they are and can distinguish between someone expressing emotion, telling a story, or getting a date wrong, versus a "pathological liar like Donald Trump." The respondent claims they can be trusted, admitting to being a "knucklehead" at times, but insists those closest know they keep their word.

I'm from Israel and had a tough past, including jail. I sold drugs and trafficked Russian women while in the IDF. I got kicked out, but stopped trafficking. The other person was shocked by my actions.

I apologize for the recent events and the hurt I've caused to Alex Turck, his loved ones, and the people of San Francisco. I am committed to regaining trust and will work hard to run the city effectively. I also apologize to my administration, staff, friends, and family for my actions.

I'm Moneypenny and I'm British. I don't profess to understand the American legal system, though I know the British system fairly well. It is fairly harsh at the moment. But I know that if a high ranking, somebody who's been awarded a medal in the British military, who used to be a jet pilot, who used to work in the intel sector of the UK military, came to us and said he was aware of a misdemeanor, a crime involving the death of many people, and he had various evidence and other people that would corroborate that, that something could be done about it, it would be investigated. So this is where I'm stuck, and I want to appeal. Pam Bondi and maybe Cash Patel. If a member of the US military who used to be a pilot, who worked in sensitive intel, who had visited the Diego Garcia Military Base, who had a level of clearance such that he was free to explore that base, who was aware of the Black Navy and the operations that would require being signed in or read in at a very senior level. That individual to me sounds as though he would be somebody that would be taken seriously. So this is where I have a problem. This is where I don't understand. I do not understand how somebody of that caliber who has spoken out, who is recorded speaking out, giving evidence corroborating, giving names of other people. Who is able to tell us where a seven seventy seven airliner with two thirty nine souls on board went and who took it and how the whole operation took place down to the mechanics of it, the individuals that took part in it. Why isn't that information being taken seriously? Why isn't that information being investigated? We are talking about murder. I'm sorry to use that word. There are two thirty nine people, souls involved and probably thousands of friends, family and many, many interested parties over the past eleven years. Many people who have dedicated a lot of time to looking at this, myself included. There are videos that potentially are giving away some of the information about what happened. But the person who has those videos, a person called Ashton Forbes, has been given letters from the American military, American department saying in a matter of national security, they cannot confirm any of the detail. So now we have a decorated military veteran, a former jet pilot who flew into Diego Garcia, who was in Iraq, who has done a lot of very impressive military work on behalf of The United States, has spoken out, is on record. I will send you the video. Why? Why is nothing being done? Why is nobody investigating? I do not understand how The United States can overlook this because, frankly, I'm pretty angry. On behalf of all those people on board, predominantly Chinese and Malaysian people and all their friends and families, I demand that something is done about this. And I'm a nobody, and you don't have to listen to me. But I'm gonna put this on social media, and I'm gonna sit here and wait until somebody responds and gives a bloody good explanation as to why nobody is taking this seriously. Because frankly, it's inhumane, and I don't think the Trump administration, amongst anybody else, would allow something inhumane to take place. I hope you agree.

The speaker was asked about a statement where they said they carried weapons in war despite never deploying to a war zone. The speaker responded that they are proud of their 24 years of service and their record speaks for itself. They speak candidly and passionately, especially about children being shot in schools. When asked if they misspoke about being in war, the speaker said the conversation was about carrying weapons of war after a school shooting, and their grammar isn't always correct. The speaker stated they will never demean another member's service.

I apologize for my remarks in the leaked video, which seemed to make light of the COVID-19 rules. I regret those comments and apologize to everyone at home. Working in government is a privilege, and I have always tried to behave with civility and decency. I am proud of the progress made on climate change and nature at COP 26. I understand the anger and frustration people feel, especially those who lost loved ones or struggled with their businesses. I am truly sorry. I am offering my resignation to the prime minister. Thank you for your time.

It's unfortunate another child's bad choice will affect him for life. The speaker has compassion for every human being. This is not a race issue, nor a black and white issue. The speaker does not want the situation politicized. The speaker does not appreciate online remarks from people who weren't present during the event.