reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Misinformation and disinformation are leading people to believe untrue things, especially about vaccinations. However, all vaccines distributed in Canada are safe and uncompromising. While individuals have the freedom to choose, there are no more excuses to not get vaccinated. Enforcement measures will ensure everyone is vaccinated, including incentives for travelers and restrictions for those who are not vaccinated. This approach has led to a higher vaccination rate compared to other countries. It's worth noting that unknown causes were the leading cause of death in Alberta last year.

Out of the 100,000 Canadian doctors, almost all of them have been vaccinated. However, there have been cases of sudden deaths among doctors, mostly due to cardiac issues, blood clots, and aggressive cancers. These cancers, referred to as "turbo cancer" on social media, are extremely aggressive and present at stage 4, leading to death within months. This phenomenon is unlike anything seen before, with young individuals developing rare brain cancers, stage 4 breast and colon cancers in their twenties and thirties, and rapidly progressing leukemias and lymphomas. The severity and nature of these cancers are unprecedented, according to a doctor who has diagnosed over 20,000 cancer patients in their career.

These ten deaths are the tip of the iceberg. There is a vast number of deaths in the peer reviewed literature. These have cases have already been vetted. We don't need FDA officials to comment to them on them. They're deeply concerning. And then our US CDC vaccine administration adverse event system, VAERS, has in total now, this is shocking for United States residents, nineteen thousand four hundred and eighty deaths. About two thousand of these have occurred right within forty eight hours of the shot, and then nineteen thousand two hundred seventy nine Americans reported to be permanently disabled. These are reported to VAERS by doctors like myself who have already determined the vaccine is the cause of the injury, disability, or death. Because if the vaccine was not the cause, then we wouldn't do the report to VAERS. So this is the VAERS does indicate causation by proxy of reporting. This is very important. The VAERS system, I'll say it again, indicates the vaccine is the cause of the problem because the doctor or the health care provider in the field at the scene who's examined the patient, examined the autopsy and the medical record information, examined the clinical record, the vaccine administration has determined the vaccine is the cause. Otherwise, a VAERS report would not be made. So this is very important. I would say at this point in time, both Macron and Prasad should immediately call for the COVID nineteen vaccines to be removed from the market. Every day they continue to delay on this, the more Americans will be hurt by boosters. We've already had several hundred deaths this year that have occurred on their watch. B, they should initiate a safety review of the 19480 deaths with an independent panel to review all the information. The CDC has the patients and their families' phone numbers, emails, addresses. There ought to be interviews of family members for the deceased, interviews of the patient themselves for injuries and disabilities to to get their side of the story. The CDC has all that information. The review should be done independently by people who are not CDC or FDA employees, And there should be multiple reviewers and should be an adjudication process and finally, a determination of causality for the vaccine. And then I would say, finally, the FDA officials, including Macari and Prasad, needs to start showing up to important proceedings in Washington. There have been multiple hearings on vaccine safety. One that I was the lead witness on, 05/21/2025. Yeah. We published a report indicating that there was a government cover up of COVID nineteen vaccine induced mild pericarditis, including fatal cases.

There are two patterns we need to examine: vaccine-related deaths and hospital-related deaths. Hospital homicides may, unfortunately, be greater. Acute renal failure, or sudden kidney failure, seems to be occurring mostly in hospitals and has increased since the CMS NCTAP program, which is a payout program for remdesivir, began. This also involves a greater NIH protocol that includes ventilators. In 2020, there was a signal of acute renal failure; people were put on ventilators and developed lung infections. The government is not examining the data, but over 153,000 excess people have died in the last three years from acute renal failure alone, which is much younger than typical COVID deaths. Doctors were coerced by medical boards and organizations to use these protocols, or they would risk losing their licenses. I believe some people knew exactly what they were doing regarding these hospital protocols. More than half a million people have been killed by hospital protocols and another half a million by the vaccines.

It is acceptable to die today. If your family is struggling with financial burdens and the stress of medical treatments, call us and we will assure you that it is okay to pass away. If you are tired of ineffective medicine, experiencing weight loss and hair loss, and looking frail, taking a shot can relieve your pain. Today is a suitable day to pass away.

When medically assisted dying (MAID) became legal in Canada in 2016, it was limited to those facing imminent death, but accessibility expanded in March. Critics argue that MAID devalues the lives of people with disabilities, particularly those living in poverty. The Netherlands has monthly reviews of assisted dying cases, while Canada only publishes annual statistics. Last year, MAID accounted for 3.3% of deaths in Canada, with cancer as the leading cause. Although many seek MAID, the federal government emphasizes safeguards to ensure eligibility is carefully considered. Canada is set to further expand MAID eligibility to include individuals with mental disorders, potentially increasing its prevalence to about 4% of all deaths, similar to Belgium and the Netherlands.

Since 2016, euthanasia has been legal in Canada, with plans to extend it to mental health conditions next year. In June 2019, Alan Nichols, 61, requested euthanasia after being hospitalized in Chilliwack and died by lethal injection. His brother, Gary, shares that while assisted dying can be compassionate, its loose application can put families in difficult situations. Before hospitalization, Alan faced challenges from a benign brain tumor diagnosed at age 12, which led to surgeries that impaired his right side and hearing. Despite these challenges, he lived a relatively normal life, engaging in daily activities, and was not completely incapacitated. Gary emphasizes that Alan's life was still worth living, raising concerns about the criteria for euthanasia.

There is a mass psychosis happening where doctors are recommending more shots that cause heart and kidney damage, leading to death. The challenge is to bring people out of this trance without more loss of life. Matthias Desmond warns that this situation usually results in significant casualties.

Dan Dix opens by presenting a stark portrait of Canada, praising compassion and healthcare but asserting a dark secret: ninety thousand lives have been killed through Canada’s medical assistance in dying program (MAiD) since legalization in 2016. He asserts this number is an estimate based on what is known and that the true figure could be higher, noting that doctors are sometimes under pressure to propose MAID even when patients do not raise it. He frames MAiD as a system that is accelerating, claiming it has become the leading cause of death in some provinces and that, in 2024, nearly five percent of all deaths in Canada were due to MAID—one in every twenty deaths. Dix argues the scope has expanded beyond terminal illness to include poverty, mental health, or simply feeling like a burden. He alleges veterans with PTSD, disabled individuals, and people who cannot afford housing are being offered MAID. He contends this is not compassionate care but a “conveyor belt to death” sold as dignity, and accuses the government of not fully disclosing the data. He provides anecdotes, saying he knows a man who was offered MAID three times during a single hospital visit, clarifying that the person wanted help, not an option to end his life. He characterizes Canada’s euthanasia regime as a machine “chewing up the vulnerable, the poor, and the broken, and spitting out body bags,” and asserts the world is watching, labeling Canada as “progressive” while describing the situation as a dystopian nightmare. In addressing what should be done, Dix encourages discussion, sharing the video, and demanding answers about why Canada is promoting death as a solution to suffering. He emphasizes the 90,000 figure as representing real people with families and futures. Dix references his video featuring Angelina Ireland from the Delta Hospice Society, describing how the government allegedly took her property for refusing to participate in MAID and allegedly sent “death cult activists” to shut her down. He asserts that there is resistance to MAID and calls for support for that movement. He promotes audience action: share the video, join the fight for life, and support his efforts via donations at pressfortruth.ca/donate, with options for one-time PayPal donations, monthly contributions, e-transfer to Dan@pressfortruth.ca, or mail to his P.O. box. Dix concludes by urging viewers to choose life over death, promising more video reports, and signing off with a call to subscribe, like, share, and stay tuned. He closes with a reiteration of “truth” as the guiding message.

The conversation centers on serious concerns about medical assistance in dying (MAID) in Canada, with Dr. York Sang offering observations from his experience as a retired vascular surgeon and professor. The discussion covers how MAID is carried out, what drugs are used, how death is defined and monitored, and broader systemic issues in Canadian healthcare and autopsy practices. Key points raised - Realities of MAID versus expectations: The hosts note that MAID is not quick or necessarily painless, and that its dignity is attributed to one drug that causes paralysis, making death appear orderly to onlookers rather than to the patient. Dr. Sang agrees that, based on a large Canadian cohort, the process is not always quick or painless, and its perceived dignity largely stems from the paralytic drug used. - Drug regimens and their administration: The described MAID protocol commonly uses a sequence mirroring execution methods: a sedative (a large dose of a benzodiazepine, such as midazolam), followed by an anesthetic (propofol), then a paralytic, and finally a cardiotoxic agent to cause death. The typical MAID drug kit is presented as a standard set, with most patients receiving the sedative, anesthetic, and paralytic, but only about a quarter receiving a cardiotoxic “kill shot” (e.g., potassium chloride or a high-dose local anesthetic to cause fatal rhythm disruption). Approximately 90% of patients receive the sedative, anesthetic, and paralytic; about 25% receive the cardiotoxic agent. The time to death varies widely, with an average around nine minutes but ranges from one minute to over two hours; about a quarter die after more than an hour, according to the cited data. - Training and oversight concerns: Dr. Sang and Odessa discuss that most MAID providers are not anesthesiologists, and that a small minority of doctors—predominantly family physicians, rural GP-anesthetists—provide MAID without specialized training in anesthesia or MAID pharmacology. They argue that 79% of MAID providers had little to no formal training in the drugs used. This raises questions about monitoring, recognition of pain or distress, and ensuring consistency in death certification. - Monitoring and definitions of death: A major thread is the lack of continuous monitoring during MAID and the reliance on clinical death (no heart sounds, no breathing). Dr. Sang notes that the brain is likely still functioning for several minutes after clinical death, suggesting that the patient may still experience distress or wakefulness prior to the official death declaration. There is debate over whether brain activity should guide the determination of death, with some arguing for brain-wave monitoring to avoid premature cessation of artificial support. - Autopsy and post-mortem questions: The discussion references historical concerns from Dr. Joel Zivitt (a Canadian-turned-U.S.-based anesthesiologist) about deaths in the U.S. execution context and why autopsies were performed there. He reported that many blood samples showed anesthetic levels below surgical anesthesia at the time of death, and autopsies revealed pulmonary edema in a large majority of examined cases, raising questions about whether the anesthesia dosing and drug combinations may contribute to distressing end-of-life phenomena. - The pool of providers and ethics: The conversation touches on the notion that MAID is driven by a small, possibly specialized group of physicians, with concerns about whether some providers “hold back” from giving a full, lethal cocktail or whether systemic issues (time pressures, workload) influence practice. Dr. Sang emphasizes that the problem is not that MAID is necessarily too available, but that its execution lacks standardized training, monitoring, and ethical safeguards. - The broader policy and culture context: BC and Quebec are highlighted as leading provinces in MAID uptake, with BC representing nearly seven percent of all deaths due to MAID—almost double the national average. The participants discuss how expanding indications, including discussions about younger individuals or even pediatric cases, are part of ongoing debates in Canada, contrasted with other Western jurisdictions that push back against broader MAID access. - Alternatives: Dr. Sang advocates for palliative care as the preferable approach for terminal illness, noting that opioids (e.g., morphine) and comfort-focused care can offer relief without MAID. A striking point raised is that in the discussed MAID data, zero-point-six percent of patients received any narcotics during MAID. In summary, the dialogue presents a critical view of MAID implementation in Canada, focusing on drug cocktails and their administration, the adequacy of training and monitoring, the meaning and verification of death, and calls for greater emphasis on palliative care and autopsy-based scrutiny to ensure end-of-life practices align with patients’ comfort and dignity. The conversation also situates these concerns within broader provincial trends and policy debates around MAID’s expansion.

The Dutch state has begun euthanizing citizens, including children under 12, with minor disabilities, autism, or alcoholism, claiming it will save the planet. The government ordered the euthanasia of citizens with autism and other minor disabilities without fear of prosecution, even without the patient's consent. Between 2012 and 2021, around 40 autistic or intellectually disabled people were forcibly euthanized in the Netherlands. A Kingston University investigation links rising autism rates to intensive vaccine schedules. The Dutch government considers euthanasia the answer to the autism explosion, pushing aluminum-laced vaccines on toddlers. Black people younger than 30 were euthanized with autism listed as the sole reason. The state is also euthanizing alcoholic sex abuse victims, and those with dementia or depression. Experts question if the euthanasia law is becoming a Nazi-style eugenics program.

Speaker 0 recalls a case: “patient, he was sick. He looked like he was dying, but they just, like, pushed morphine. He had no pain. You know, they do a pain score, so zero to 10. This guy had zero pain.” Then, “they pushed insulin to drop his sugar, and his glucose was fine. And then he died three minutes later.” He says he “turned him into medical board. I reviewed this chart and turned him into medical board. Nothing.” “But, yeah, they definitely that definitely went on during COVID.” Speaker 1: “Jesus. That is such a terrifying thought that someone would just decide so many people are dying. This guy's definitely gonna die. Yep. This is 100% real?” Speaker 0: “Yeah. Definite. Definite.” Speaker 1: “It's It seems like something” Speaker 0: “they would call it tell euthanasia. They don't call it euthanasia.” Speaker 1: “It seems like something I would tell me, and then I would have to ask you. Like, this is something someone told me. I'm sure this” Speaker 0: “is send you the record that I read to you.” Speaker 1: “It seems like something I would be bringing up to you as a ridiculous thing, and you'd shoot it down.”

Speaker 0 states that the Journal of Death and Dying, in 2025, published Health Canada's plans to save money by shifting to MAID (medical assistance in dying) rather than palliative care. The plan projects savings from 2027 to 2047 amounting to $1,273,000,000,000 by providing fourteen point seven million Canadians with MAID. The breakdown of those fourteen point seven million Canadians includes: - Over nine million projected to be elderly. - Over four million projected to be mentally ill and suicidal. - Over three hundred thousand projected to be Indigenous. - The remainder described as addicts, homeless, and others. Speaker 0 emphasizes that Canada is running a program and intends to expand it, including a mentally ill only qualification beginning in 2027. They note that the statistics are "disgusting" to them and direct listeners to check the SAGE journal, or the Journal of Death and Dying, for the detailed breakdown, stating that the sources go through the numbers. They also mention that they have covered these figures on their series as well.

Speaker 0: It was January 2022 when a colleague of mine in the unit came to me saying, something's up. We've had a doubling or tripling of baby deaths in the last year. And that's what got my curiosity piqued. Speaker 1: Their own government told us a medical treatment was safe, and it killed babies. Speaker 2: I have lost all faith that Health Canada is looking out genuine for the best interests of Canadians. Speaker 3: Doctors made extra money to push vaccines and they were given a billing code to do it. I have pulled all the billing codes. Speaker 2: They've purchased the vaccine that hasn't been approved. They've distributed it to the province so the second it's approved, we can start jabbing ourselves with it. We can start jabbing pregnant mothers with it. Speaker 4: Why did we have to get these vaccinations? Like, why was this something that we had to do? You go to the hospital, you expect to have a baby, and you expect to go home, And then you don't. Speaker 0: I was suspect that there was criminal negligence on part of the government and the public health officials. Possible. They pushed on with this narrative to everybody, including pregnant and breastfeeding women, that the mRNA shots were safe and effective. Speaker 2: They had wiretapped her phone. They had harassed her. They had charged her. They didn't allow any expert witnesses to testify. Speaker 1: Our Canadian babies died, and the police are trying to cover it up to the point of stopping detective Helen Greaves from testifying about it. Speaker 2: The dominant individuals keep the subordinates in their place by constant aggression. Speaker 4: If you don't want to get vaccinated, that's your choice. But don't think you can get on a plane or a train besides vaccinated people and put them at risk. Speaker 2: It started off with CBC running a story to implicate her and to paint her with a brush that looks uncomplimentary to the public. Speaker 5: Canada has to shift their understanding of what the CBC is. It is a state broadcaster pushing the agenda of the Liberal government of Canada. Speaker 2: This is the most significant matter affecting our children today from a health perspective, and they're still not investigating. Everything emanates outward from this case involving law enforcement, the judicial system, the pharmaceutical industry, our health agencies, how they work together, how they censored information. It all ties together to this one case, and that's what makes it so dangerous.

People are going to Switzerland and Canada for medical assistance in dying, including vaccine-injured individuals. In Canada, over 15,000 people received medical assistance in dying in 2023. The speaker questions this, suggesting that the focus should be on helping people live instead of facilitating death. They compare it to suicide hotlines that aim to prevent suicide. The speaker suggests exploring options to improve people's health and well-being, addressing hormone levels and other physical issues that may contribute to depression.

In November 2022, Medsafe discontinued regular reports on adverse events following COVID injections in New Zealand. They acknowledged that the reporting system captures only a small fraction of the actual number of adverse events. By that time, Medsafe had received 65,000 adverse event reports, suggesting that around 1.3 million New Zealanders experienced adverse events. Among these reports, there were 3,688 serious cases, nearly 6,000 for young people aged 5 to 19, and 184 deaths. The numbers of adverse events and deaths following COVID injections far exceed those from other vaccines. Similar trends are observed globally, with thousands of deaths and millions of adverse event reports for COVID vaccines. The impact on individuals and families is significant and unprecedented.

In 2016, Canada and California legalized medical assistance in dying. Despite having similar populations, California has seen only 893 cases of assisted suicide, while Canada has reported over 50,000. This stark difference raises concerns about Canada's approach, which some view as predatory. Critics argue that instead of providing palliative care, Canada is expanding eligibility for assisted dying to vulnerable groups, including children as young as 12, the mentally ill, homeless individuals, and addicts.

The speaker discusses concerns about Medical Assistance in Dying (MAID) in Canada, highlighting issues with the drug sodium thiopental and its potential for causing drowning during the procedure. Autopsies reveal troubling details about the process, contradicting claims of a painless death. The speaker also mentions cases of families being denied access to autopsy reports. These revelations raise questions about the ethics and transparency of MAID practices in Canada.

When medically assisted dying (MAID) became legal in Canada in 2016, it was limited to those facing imminent death. Accessibility expanded in March, raising concerns about the devaluation of life for people with disabilities living in poverty. The rapid increase in requests for MAID, particularly among those in financial distress, has surprised many. Unlike the Netherlands, Canada lacks regular reviews of assisted dying cases, although it does provide annual statistics. In the last year, MAID accounted for 3.3% of all deaths in Canada, with cancer being the most common reason. The federal government emphasizes enhanced safeguards, asserting that two doctors would unlikely approve MAID if a person's suffering could be alleviated through available treatments. Canada is set to further expand eligibility to include those with mental disorders, aligning with practices in Belgium and the Netherlands.

LifeSite News reported that Wisconsin has joined 20 other states in legalizing the liquefying of dead humans and flushing them into the municipal sewer system. According to the speaker's research, these liquefied remains, many of whom allegedly died from vaccines, are turned into biosludge and used as fertilizer on crops. The speaker claims that in 2021, people killed by vaccines are dissolved into liquid, flushed down the drain, concentrated into biosludge, and spread on food crops. The speaker states this is confirmed, vetted, verified, and equates it to feeding the dead to the living.

I recently testified in the US Senate on December 7th, 2022. I want to be very clear: the vaccine is killing people, and it's killing large numbers of people. It fulfills all the criteria for the Bradford Hill tenets of causality for a medicinal product causing death. As of December 23rd, 2022, the CDC has recorded over sixteen thousand Americans that have died within a few days of taking the vaccine, and that's probably a gross underreport. I was recently at a conference in Romania on the COVID crisis. There was a lot of work trying to unpack what we actually understand, and I saw a credible estimate of something like seventeen million deaths globally from this technology. When you scale up to billions, it's not hard to reach a number like that with a technology this dangerous.

As a psychiatrist in community mental health, I've seen how MAID affects my patients. Some express a desire to stop treatment, feeling they can choose to die instead. This shift undermines our efforts to support their recovery; we're now focused on preventing MAID as much as preventing suicide. I recall a patient, Ray, 62, with metastatic lung cancer, who had long sought MAID. When I confirmed his eligibility, I witnessed a physical transformation in him—his shoulders relaxed, and he smiled for the first time. He decided to proceed with MAID, and during the process, he expressed gratitude, saying, "I think you saved my life." This highlights the importance of providing care for those who truly need and want it.

LifeSite News reported that Wisconsin has joined 20 other states in legalizing the liquefying of dead humans and flushing them into the municipal sewer system. According to the speaker's research, these liquefied remains, many of whom allegedly died from vaccines, are turned into biosludge and used as fertilizer on crops. The speaker claims that in 2021, people killed by vaccines are dissolved into liquid, flushed down the drain, concentrated into biosludge, and spread on food crops. The speaker states this is confirmed, vetted, verified, and equates it to feeding the dead to the living.

A woman shares a heartbreaking story about a 13-year-old girl who had cancer and was convinced by doctors and nurses at a hospital in Edmonton, Alberta to end her own life using medical assistance in dying (MAID). The girl's parents had left her briefly to get some supplies when this happened. The mother, who had come to the hospital the day after her daughter's death, was devastated and felt helpless because the girl had signed the consent form. The speaker expresses anger towards the healthcare system and advises parents to keep their children away from hospitals. They also mention an article from CBC that claims MAID will save a significant amount of money in healthcare expenses.

The government is aggressively expanding the MAID program to include mental health disorders for euthanasia. A 27-year-old woman with autism and ADHD was approved for MAID and euthanized despite her father's efforts to stop it. There are concerns that vaccine-injured individuals will be pushed towards MAID. Canadians are complacent about these changes, which now include allowing children to make end-of-life decisions without parental consent. Canada has the loosest standards for euthanasia globally. The UK is also facing similar terrifying developments.