TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

A recent study involving 99 million COVID vaccine recipients found increased risks of neurological and heart disorders, described as rare but significant. For example, the risk of brain swelling increased by 378%, myocarditis by 610%, and Guillain Barre syndrome by 286%. The cumulative risk of these adverse events raises questions about the overall safety of vaccines, especially considering the CDC's childhood vaccination schedule, which includes 72 doses without long-term safety trials. Each vaccine has a list of potential side effects, many serious, yet they are often labeled as rare. Historical data shows a rise in chronic illnesses among vaccinated children, suggesting a troubling trend. The notion that vaccine injuries are non-existent is misleading, as many children are experiencing adverse effects. It’s crucial to recognize and evaluate these risks comprehensively.

Doctors who promoted the vaccine were wrong, causing harm. Some doctors remain silent. A doctor treated vaccine injuries early on, defying rules and saving lives. Having a trustworthy doctor is rare. Apologies and explanations are needed for credibility.

Speaker 0: Because there was such a mass vaccination campaign with a product that, you know, tens of thousands, hundreds of thousands of people were injured in this process, what work is the NIH doing in terms of research to somehow help these people? Because just from my own experience, my wife and I made a film about this, right? These people were, even though in some cases they were supported a bit by, but mostly just completely gaslit and just, no, your issue doesn't exist. Right? So how are you approaching this? Speaker 1: Well, you're absolutely right. There were absolutely like, lot patients of who were vaccine injured were gaslit, pretending as if they didn't get injured or that somehow their symptoms are all Speaker 1: in their head or something. Actually, this is part of a broader phenomenon, where, you have patients with conditions that are poorly understood, where the medical system will gaslight them leave. They can they're telling you it's a a psychological issue rather than a physical issue. It should make you think that you're crazy because you you you have symptoms that you just, you know you have, but you can't convince anyone else to do anything about it. Injury is one of them, long COVID, MECFS, Lyme chronic Lyme disease, a whole host of these conditions where it just fits a very similar pattern. Speaker 1: The key underlying thing is that there isn't excellent science to guide decision making for clinicians or anybody else, for patients. And I've made sure that people know at the NIH that I'm very interested in investing in answers for patients for all of those. Vaccine injury, long COVID, MECFS, chronic Lyme. We need to get better answers. The the gaslighting happens because the, if you're let's say you're a doctor and you see a patient and you have no idea what's causing their condition. Speaker 1: Right? Because the scientific literature doesn't have an answer. You're gonna be unless you're an amazing doctor who's really good at, you know, sort of being honest and compassionate, you're going to be wanting to, like, move on to the next patient. And, it's really, really unfortunate. The answer is to get good answers, right? Speaker 1: So invest in, research on treatments, on underlying physiology, physiological causes, you know, basic biological knowledge, so that those patients actually can can the doctors and the caregivers for those patients can will treat them correctly. Speaker 0: So but is is NIH doing this for people that are that have been COVID vaccine injures against a huge number of people relatively. Speaker 1: We have investments in that, and we're going have more investments in that at the start, you know, this year. For all of those conditions, I think patients deserve an answer, and I'm definitely, interested in finding I would love to know myself.

There is no education in medical schools about vaccines, their contents, safety records, informed consent, or the vaccine injury compensation program. Congress removed all liability from pharma related to vaccine adverse events in 1986. Medical professionals are taught to memorize the vaccine schedule. Almost $4 billion has been paid to vaccine-injured patients since 1992. There appears to be a conflict of interest regarding payments to providers for completing vaccine schedules. Patients are being dismissed from practices due to vaccine safety concerns. Employers are forcing employees to receive the flu vaccine or face corrective action or job loss. There is a lack of informed consent; providers often give information sheets after vaccinating. There is a lack of transparency regarding vaccine complications, and patients are shamed for suggesting they were harmed by a vaccine. Unlike other adverse reactions to medications, vaccine adverse events are often dismissed.

Several individuals have reported adverse reactions after receiving COVID-19 vaccines. Some experienced paralysis, while others suffered from blood clots, heart issues, or neurological disorders. The CDC and FDA have launched investigations into these cases. Despite these incidents, health authorities maintain that adverse reactions are rare, and the vaccines have been effective in preventing severe illness and death. However, some individuals feel that their concerns are being dismissed or ignored. Long-term effects and the safety of vaccines remain topics of discussion. Families affected by adverse reactions are seeking compensation and calling for more transparency and open dialogue on the subject.

Dr. Umesh Adalja mentions a small segment may be harmed by any vaccine. However, recent statements from various sources suggest an attempt to downplay vaccine injuries as insignificant. Despite claims of minimal harm, data shows over 33 million Americans have been affected by the COVID-19 vaccine since 2021, with 1.1 million deaths, 4 million disabilities, and 28.6 million injuries leading to chronic illness.

The exemption for pharmaceutical companies from liability for vaccine injuries is alarming. Many people have experienced severe side effects, yet discussing these issues is often taboo. One individual shared that their worst illness in 15 years followed taking the vaccine, despite having had COVID multiple times. There’s a reluctance, especially among those on the left, to acknowledge vaccine injuries due to fear of being labeled anti-vaccine. Some public figures have suffered serious side effects but choose to remain silent. Others, like a colleague, worry about lasting effects such as dizziness and balance issues. This reluctance to discuss vaccine-related health concerns highlights a broader issue of censorship around the topic.

Medical authorities are denying the existence of vaccine-related cancers, leaving patients without proper research or treatment options. Doctors are being threatened and silenced, with some losing their positions and labs for speaking out. Only a few doctors are raising the alarm, while the medical establishment ignores the issue. This denial extends to other vaccine injuries, such as myocarditis, which can lead to sudden cardiac arrest. The denial prevents the development of new treatments and solutions. The medical authorities' refusal to acknowledge vaccine injuries is causing harm and preventing the advancement of medical knowledge and care.

People received the COVID vaccine for various reasons, including vulnerability, protecting loved ones and patients, and traveling. Afterward, they experienced injuries and were often dismissed by doctors who didn't know how to help or attributed the symptoms to other causes. Some were told not to share their stories. Many faced disbelief and bullying, with some receiving death threats. They have been injured for months. No one seems to know how to help, research the injuries, or believe them. Experiences shared on social media were labeled as misinformation, leading to warnings, bans, and the silencing of support groups. Reports to VAERS often went unanswered or were incorrectly recorded. Despite being told their experiences are rare and the vaccines are safe, their reality is unchanged. They feel abandoned, marginalized, and silenced, and seek help, research, and recognition. They emphasize they are real people, not misinformation, and are not rare.

There is a group of people called the "invisibles" who have experienced adverse effects from vaccines. They have been ignored by the medical community, dismissed by mainstream society, and hidden by institutions. The president of a committee dedicated to listening to these individuals shared that they were abandoned and suffering. When they finally had a hearing in the Senate, they were told that they were not expected or accounted for. This reality was disregarded and continues to be. One person's mother, for example, became partially paralyzed and experienced nausea after receiving two vaccines. She is still in the hospital after three years. Despite similar stories, some people deny that the vaccines are to blame.

There have been unprecedented injuries, disabilities, and deaths from COVID-19 vaccines. By January 22, 2021, 182 deaths were reported to the US vaccine adverse event reporting system. The FDA and CDC, who co-administer the program, lack experience in vaccine campaigns. Pfizer knew about 1,223 deaths within 90 days of their vaccine but kept it confidential. Moderna has not released their data. There are over 34,100 peer-reviewed papers on vaccine injuries, disabilities, and deaths.

The exemption for pharmaceutical companies from liability for vaccine injuries is alarming. Many people have experienced severe side effects, yet discussing these issues remains taboo. After receiving the vaccine, I felt sicker than ever, even after having COVID multiple times. Many friends report feeling ill after their second vaccine dose, but this side effect isn't openly acknowledged. The history of pharmaceutical companies lying and facing fines raises concerns about their accountability. Political donations from these companies influence discussions, and there's a reluctance to address vaccine injuries, especially among those on the left. Some individuals fear being labeled as anti-vaxxers, despite experiencing lasting effects like dizziness and balance issues. Many are hesitant to speak out, even if they believe they were vaccine-injured.

The speaker claims the medical landscape is dominated by COVID vaccine injuries, disabilities, and deaths, and that they submit multiple entries daily to VAERS, facing scrutiny and potential penalties for falsification. They state they diagnosed an executive in her late thirties with Guillain Barre syndrome from COVID-19 vaccination. The speaker estimates that only 1% of manuscripts on COVID vaccine injuries are being published, suggesting a tremendous bias, and that there are about 4,000 papers on the vaccine debacle, which is about 1% of reality. They claim to have never seen myocarditis, heart failure, or blood clots from eating frosted flakes, but are seeing people devastated by the shots. The speaker advocates for removing COVID-19 vaccines from the market, a critical reevaluation of the vaccine schedule, dropping all vaccine mandates, and rescinding the 1986 Vaccine Injury Compensation Act.

Multiple individuals share their experiences of adverse reactions and health issues following COVID-19 vaccination. Some report paralysis, loss of feeling, chronic pain, blood clots, heart problems, and other severe symptoms. Concerns are raised about the safety of vaccines, while others emphasize the overall effectiveness and rarity of serious adverse reactions. The CDC investigates deaths potentially linked to the Johnson & Johnson vaccine. A mother shares her daughter's debilitating condition after participating in the Pfizer vaccine trial. These personal accounts highlight the need for further examination and open discussion regarding vaccine-related injuries.

We represent three groups advocating for those affected by COVID vaccine injuries and bereavements: UK CV Family, Vaccine Injured and Bereaved UK, and the Scottish Vaccine Injury Group. Our inquiry highlights the need to acknowledge the real experiences of those impacted, who are neither anti-science nor anti-vaccine. We urge the inquiry to examine the production, regulation, and rollout of vaccines, including the communication of risks and the adequacy of post-rollout monitoring. Many individuals faced disbelief and stigma when reporting symptoms, and the Vaccine Damage Payment Scheme is inadequate. Urgent reform is necessary to support the injured and bereaved, as their experiences must inform future vaccination programs. The inquiry must listen to these voices and propose meaningful changes to ensure better care and support for those affected.

There are over 3,400 peer-reviewed papers in the National Library of Medicine that describe fatal and nonfatal vaccine injury syndromes. These vaccines have been proven to cause real side effects in four major categories. Firstly, cardiovascular issues such as heart inflammation, myocarditis, and cardiac arrest. Secondly, neurologic problems including stroke, Gambray syndrome, and neuropathy. Thirdly, unprecedented blood clotting that doesn't respond to usual treatments. Lastly, immune system abnormalities. These side effects are not controversial or theoretical, but rather a reality.

The speaker discusses the recognition of side effects from the Covid-19 vaccine by public authorities. After two years of conspiracy theories, the link between the vaccine and various health issues is now acknowledged. Only 72 out of 241 cases have received compensation for vaccine-related adverse effects. The main incidents recognized are cardiac disorders, particularly myocarditis and pericarditis. Neurological disorders, such as facial paralysis, and severe vascular issues like strokes, thrombosis, and pulmonary embolisms, have also been reported. The difficulty in reporting adverse events and the low number of victims seeking compensation are highlighted. The speaker suggests that the media downplayed the severity of these effects during vaccination campaigns.

An analysis of clinical trial data showed that for every eight hundred people vaccinated, one suffers a serious adverse event. The goal is to end the silence for the one in eight hundred. It is time to stop politicizing vaccine injuries and start building meaningful recognition, research, competent care, and fair and just compensation.

In my practice, we have administered around three to four thousand vaccinations. Initially, we didn't observe many side effects, but they gradually increased throughout the year. As more people came with post-vaccination complaints, we formed groups of doctors who also noticed similar issues in their patients. Symptoms included heart rhythm disturbances, extreme fatigue, persistent muscle pain, and nerve inflammation. Seeking scientific discourse was challenging as it was dismissed, claiming the symptoms were unrelated to the vaccine. This created an internal conflict for me and many doctors who genuinely want the best for their patients. One notable case involved a sixteen-year-old boy who developed severe heart inflammation forty-eight hours after the second dose. Although he recovered, the trust people place in us compels us to be honest about what we observe. We must inform individuals about our experiences until evidence proves otherwise.

Summary 3: The video highlights the experiences of individuals who have suffered adverse effects from the Covid-19 vaccine, expressing frustration with the lack of recognition and support from healthcare providers and the government. Concerns are raised about the safety and efficacy of the vaccines, emphasizing the need for further investigation and transparency. The vaccination of children and the changing guidelines surrounding it are also discussed. The speakers stress the importance of sharing their stories and supporting one another in the face of indifference and suffering. Additionally, the video addresses the challenges faced by individuals who advocate for honest debate and informed choices about vaccines, as they receive abuse from both pro-vaccine and anti-vaccine sides. The role of government advisory groups and the media in creating a culture of fear and stifling democratic discussion is highlighted. Overall, the video calls for open dialogue and informed decision-making to prevent further harm.

There is overwhelming evidence of a pandemic of vaccine injuries, with millions harmed or killed. Urgent action is needed to find solutions for those affected. Serious harms, especially cardiovascular issues, may persist for years post-vaccination. Boosters and immunosuppression may increase cancer risk. Transparency and collaboration among scientists are crucial to address these issues and identify vulnerable populations. Lifestyle changes can help reduce risks. This crisis is likely a major contributor to excess deaths worldwide.

Doctors and politicians have promoted vaccines, but refuse to acknowledge potential harm. Many Americans who received the vaccine may face unknown risks. The truth must be revealed to prevent future harm from the mRNA platform.

The speaker finds it difficult to find someone who hasn't been damaged by the vaccine, and even senior consultant colleagues haven't connected their ailments to the vaccine. The speaker claims the vaccine causes autoimmune diseases, of which there are 131 types, all reportedly linked to the vaccine. Individually, these appear as coincidences, but collectively, a high percentage of vaccinated people suffer from one or more autoimmune conditions. The speaker is annoyed by their GP practice constantly pushing boosters, even knowing their views, suggesting they are incentivized by payment. The speaker believes that if the practice adhered to "first do no harm," they would refuse to administer the vaccines.

Speaker 0: No compensation is available for people with legitimate vaccine injuries, as there is already a system in place through ACC for managing such cases. Speaker 1: However, many vaccine-injured individuals have been denied by ACC and are facing personal financial burdens for their treatment. The requirement of proving the injury is a high bar to meet. Speaker 2: It is not a high bar if a proper examination system is in place. If someone was fine before receiving the vaccine and experienced severe consequences afterward, it is likely caused by the vaccine. We should let an independent commissioner investigate the truth instead of arguing about it.