reSee.it - Related Video Feed

I recently had a conversation with a libertarian who disagreed with my stance on the Federal Reserve. They wanted to abolish it, while I advocated for an audit first. I believe an audit, similar to the one conducted on USAID, would reveal issues and garner public support for necessary changes. The current level of interest in this topic is surprising and encouraging. The public's growing awareness of sound money principles is promising. There are many naysayers, but the increased interest is positive. People are discovering concerning information within government agencies like the Treasury and USAID, and rather than addressing these issues, many are choosing to ignore them. Elon Musk's public support for auditing, and even my leadership of an audit team, highlights the growing momentum behind this movement. The Constitution clearly states that states should use only gold and silver as legal tender, but the federal government prevents this. To promote sound money, competing currencies, limited only by laws against fraud and deceit, should be allowed.

Speaker: The thing that makes the current system what they would call slavery is debt-based and secrecy. And the failure of their elected representatives to require, you know, to get obey the law. So you have lawlessness, you have debt-based, and you have secrecy. The problem is not that the currency is fiat. Because if you go back through history, if you read Alexander Del Mar, the most effective currencies in the world are fiat currencies that are well governed. We have a debt-based fiat currency that is not well governed in my opinion, but it could be. Now remember, there has been almost no support in the general population for managing it responsibly. Everybody was like, no. Don’t manage it responsibly. Get me my check. And if that means you’re irresponsible, that’s okay. I want my check. But you are not gonna fix this situation by going to gold and silver. You’re gonna make it much worse. Because while we’ve done this sort of hear no evil, see no evil, you know, speak no evil for thirty years, the central bankers have accumulated all the gold. So now that they have all the gold, you’re gonna tell me we’re gonna go to a gold system? Are you out of your mind? Because now they’ve got the gold. And if you start a gold transaction system, now you need gold from them, and they’ve got you over a barrel. Right? And what are you gonna do to get gold? You’re gonna have to sell your land. You’re gonna have to sell your kids. You’re gonna have to sell real assets to get their gold. Right? Why would you do that? Why would you create, you know, you’re dependent on your enemy now. You’re gonna increase your dependency on your enemy now? You’re out of your mind. Okay. That’s not a sound money system, especially because they wanna make it digital. And so they’re gonna have fiat gold, which is even— I mean, if you think fiat is bad, where do you see fiat gold when they own all the gold? So, what we want is we want a fiat system, and we want it with, you know, lawful and no secrecy or minimal secrecy. You’re gonna have to have some secrecy and a good governance system. Can we get there? Of course, we can get there. But we can’t get there if you have an entire population that is absolutely committed to corrupt short-term behavior.

The transcript presents a series of conspiracy claims about the Rothschild family, the Federal Reserve, and Jewish influence over global finance. - The Rothschild family is described as extraordinarily wealthy, with wealth estimates claiming “close to $500,000,000,000,000,” and as having hidden underground vaults, secret financial records never audited, and a public image that disguises a fortune that supposedly rivals a large share of global wealth. It is claimed they bought Reuters in the 1800s, which then bought the Associated Press, and that they “own controlling interest” in three major television networks, allowing them to avoid media attention. They allegedly owned and operated England’s Royal Mint and act as the gold agent for the Bank of England, directing it, with control over the London Bullion Market Association (LBMA) where 30 to 42,000,000 ounces of gold are traded daily, generating millions weekly from transaction fees. They are said to fix the world price of gold daily, hoard trillions of dollars worth of gold bullion, and corner the world’s gold supply. They allegedly own controlling interest in Royal Dutch Shell and run phony charities and offshore banking services to hide wealth in Vatican-linked accounts at Rothschild Swiss banks, trusts, and holding companies. A figure named Elbelein Rothschild is described as not harmless, with ancestors alleged to have handpicked presidents, crashed stock markets, bankrupted nations, orchestrated wars, and sponsored mass murder and impoverishment. The wealth is claimed to be sufficient to feed, clothe, and shelter every person on earth. - The Rothschilds are described as the head of a “snake,” with a one-mile square area in London referred to as the city, cited as the headquarters of their banking dynasty, controlling money supplied through central banks of almost every nation. - A Jekyll Island meeting in November 1910 is claimed to involved seven of the world’s richest Jewish men establishing a central bank called the Federal Reserve Bank. Named participants include Nelson Aldrich, Frank Vanderlip, Henry Davison, Charles Norton, Benjamin Strong, Paul Warburg, and representatives of the Rothschild banking dynasty, with others like Benjamin Guggenheim, Isidore Strauss, and Jacob Astor purportedly opposing it. It is claimed these opposers died on the Titanic, and that opposition dissolved by April 1912. On December 23, 1913, the Federal Reserve Act was signed, creating a privately owned Federal Reserve System. A quoted remark attributed to Woodrow Wilson alleges, “I’m a most unhappy man. I’ve unwittingly ruined my country,” and a stereotype about government by a small number of dominant men rather than free opinion. - It is claimed the Federal Reserve System is private, not federal, has no reserves, is not decentralized, and that the adoption of a debt-based monetary system was accomplished. It is asserted that the current banking system (fractional reserve banking) allows privately owned banks to create money “out of thin air,” with money existing as numbers in a computer system, only about 3% in physical currency, and that control of the Fed enables domination over banks, corporations, money, and politicians. It is claimed the Fed system enslaves humanity to perpetual debt and that the elite who own the Fed seek to maintain a monopoly over credit. - A speaker questions the proper relationship between the Fed chairman and the U.S. president, noting the Federal Reserve’s independence. - A quotation attributed to a figure named Harold Grales Rosenthal claims that Jewish power has been created through manipulating the national monetary system, that the Fed is owned by Jews while appearing as a government institution, and asserts antisemitic stereotypes about Jews as parasites and producers being exploited by Jews.

"the dollars, days as the reserve currency are numbered." "we shortened that number ourselves with a self inflicted wound when Biden announced those crippling sanctions or hope they were intended to be crippling against, Russia." This sent "a strong message to the world that you don't want to hold dollars, that you don't wanna have the US dollar and US treasuries as your reserves because, you know, you run the risk of being punished by the US government." "And so we told the world, get rid of dollars and buy gold, and that's exactly what they've been doing." "That's why the of gold is at an all time record high, you know, despite the fact that retail investors have been selling gold all year." "Gold keeps going up, setting one record after another." "Gold is on pace for its best year since 1979." "That is not a coincidence."

The video argues that a “new world order” is unfolding in real time, signaling the start of a “great reset.” The host points to events from the past Friday as evidence: 3,000,000 Epstein files released, the biggest one-day drop in the history of the precious metals market, and a large arbitrage developing among Chinese, London, and US precious metals markets. Gold is described as the indicator that a full-blown reset is upon us, with attention drawn to pathways like the US’s approach to Iran and the Epstein files, while claiming a broader resetting dynamic is at work. Context for the moment centers on Friday’s nomination of Kevin Warsh (referred to as Kevin Walsh in the transcript) as the new Fed chairman. The host notes baggage around Warsh, including his appearance in Epstein files, but emphasizes his views: Warsh “hates stimulus money,” “hates quantitative easing,” and “voted against it,” believing it pushes inflation higher. He is said to have shifted on interest rates, from believing higher interest rates were good for the dollar to a different stance, and he allegedly favors slashing the Fed’s balance sheet to lower rates. The implication is that the nomination marks a shift toward a new dollar era and a shift away from a strong USD, which the host frames as a response to concerns about the US owning precious metals and controlling energy markets. The host ties these changes to a new petrodollar era, arguing that the United States, now the largest producer of oil and natural gas, has moved the petrodollar structure away from Saudi Arabia and toward the US. This trifecta—new dollar policy from the Fed, a drop in the precious metals market driven by speculators, and US control over energy policy—constitutes a “reset.” The video asserts that the traditional petrodollar system, once led by OPEC, has shifted, reducing outside leverage over Washington in energy matters. The host also claims a debate over foreign influence in the Middle East and calls for ending involvement in regional wars and bringing troops home, while criticizing mainstream outlets and certain political figures. Four main points are then presented as the crux of the reset: 1) Trump desires a weaker US dollar and is pursuing greater domestic manufacturing to compete with China and India, including the aim to export more and import less; the host frames this as a deliberate strategic shift rather than inflationary debasement. 2) The end of the Fed’s independence, with a collaboration era between the Treasury and the Fed, led by figures like Scott Pissent and Warsh, suggesting much lower interest rates and a shift of debt ownership back to American hands, with foreigners potentially selling US Treasuries. 3) Energy wars are emerging, with the US drilling and producing more oil and natural gas than Russia and Saudi Arabia combined, changing the energy dynamic with China, which remains a large importer of oil and vulnerable to such shifts. 4) Sustaining public support for volatility, with Trump’s team allegedly aiming to declare a housing emergency to lower rates, discourage Wall Street from buying single-family homes, implement tariff dividends to Americans, deliver veterans’ checks, and lower inflation and gas prices in the lead-up to midterms. The host contrasts reactions within the Trump-supporting and anti-Trump camps, asserting the reset is underway regardless of opinion. A sponsor segment then pivots to copper, arguing that copper demand is surging due to global competition for materials, and highlighting Giant Mining Corporation (ticker: BFGFF) as a primary copper idea tied to the Majuba Hill Copper Project in Nevada, noting its favorable infrastructure, past production, and strategic importance to American copper independence. The segment cites executive actions and tariff movements, including a 50% tariff on semi-finished copper products effective August 1, 2025, positioning copper as central to the new industrial reality. The host reiterates Giant Mining as the foremost copper idea and invites viewers to conduct their own research.

Trump has been challenging the Fed's autonomy since taking office, aiming to sack Jerome Powell and appoint a loyalist, but he cannot remove the chair because a Federal Reserve chief has a fixed four-year tenure. So Trump is doing the only thing that he can: he's attacking the Fed chief. We have a moron at the head of the Fed. He's a moron. Speaking of the executive chief, now you have a top choice. Do. I have I have two or three top choices. Such remarks have made investors jumpy and all of this is hurting the dollar's reputation, pushing investors towards other assets like gold, the euro, the franc, and the yen. And this does not bode well for America.

We are in a monetary revolution where the power needs to be taken back from the private families and central banks that print money. The government is not in control. This is why we can't see change in congress or have a government that works for us. We need a peaceful revolution, a monetary revolution, where we stop using their money and instead invest in assets like gold, silver, Bitcoin, Litecoin, and Global Boost. These assets can't be inflated or seized. Remember your seed phrase and keep it secure.

The speaker discusses the creation of the Federal Reserve in 1910, its role in financing wars, and its control over the economy through debt-based money creation. They mention the potential confiscation of assets, including gold, in the future. The conversation also touches on the manipulation of financial crises to implement changes in the legal system, such as central clearing of derivatives trades. The speaker emphasizes the need to stop this system to prevent further control over alternative means of exchange.

The speaker argues that "the dollars, days as the reserve currency are numbered" and claims this was worsened by "a self inflicted wound when Biden announced those crippling sanctions or hope they were intended to be crippling against, Russia." This, they say, sent a strong message that "you don't want to hold dollars, that you don't wanna have the US dollar and US treasuries as your reserves because, you know, you run the risk of being punished by the US government." "If you do something that the US government doesn't approve of, you could be sanctioned, and you may lose, those reserves at a time when you really need them." Consequently, "And so we told the world, get rid of dollars and buy gold, and that's exactly what they've been doing." They note "that's why the of gold is at an all time record high, you know, despite the fact that retail investors have been selling gold all year." "Gold keeps going up, setting one record after another." "Gold is on pace for its best year since 1979." "That is not a coincidence."

In this video, the speaker raises concerns about the dangers of central bank digital currency (CBDC) and the increasing control of banks and governments over people's assets. They discuss the potential for bank failures and the loss of individual ownership of financial assets. The World Economic Forum's plan to introduce CBDCs and biometric identification is seen as a step towards a cashless society and the erosion of personal freedoms. The speaker emphasizes the importance of individuals protecting themselves by investing in tangible assets like gold and silver. They also mention the inflation crisis, the incompetence of economic advisers, and the potential decline of the US dollar. Additionally, the video highlights the concern about the FDIC running out of money and the lack of emergency funding for failing banks. The current economic situation, including inflation and high interest rates, is causing more withdrawals than deposits, leading to bank failures. The implementation of central bank digital currency is also seen as a means of control and tracking. The speakers urge viewers to consider investing in precious metals as a means of safeguarding their assets. (202 words)

Powell: "no. I will not. The law says that, the president can't fire me." The discussion points to "a higher law, the supreme law of the land"—the "US constitution," which "never gave any authority to the federal government to create a monopoly central bank that can manipulate interest rates and counterfeit money." "Counterfeiting is a crime." "The issue is the existence of the Federal Reserve." Speaker 1 adds: "They're to continue to mess around with that, but your point is perfect," noting "arbitrary laws that they write that do not follow the rules of the constitution or natural law" and that "the constitutional restraint against, you know, a central bank, there's no authority for that, is one thing that they totally ignore." They call the Fed "a cartel of the biggest banks" with "a government privilege," and argue that "as long as the Fed does exist, we can't have a genuinely free society, free economic life." They warn, "if the central bank is permitted to permit money at will ... the value of the currency is going to go down and prices will go up." The goal is "sound money for freedom."

Fed Chair Powell stated he wouldn't resign if asked by President Trump, citing legal protections. However, the real issue is the existence of the Federal Reserve, which many believe operates outside constitutional authority. The Fed prioritizes its own survival and that of major banks, undermining a genuinely free society. For true economic freedom, sound money is essential. Education is key to helping the public understand these issues, as seen with other political matters. If the central bank continues to create money at will, currency value will decline, leading to rising prices. The founders understood that true wealth comes from productivity, not money creation. Emphasizing freedom can maximize productivity and prosperity.

Jerome Powell, the Fed chair, criticized federal spending, stating that the current path is unsustainable. This is significant because Powell has been supportive of Congress's spending habits. The US is facing massive deficits and increasing debt, which is draining the economy and posing a threat to the financial system. The Fed's role is not to manage the economy but to print money and deliver it to Wall Street and Congress through cheap debt. Powell's criticism is noteworthy as it shows concern about excessive printing. However, Congress continues its spending spree without any checks or balances. The media fails to address this issue, leaving most Americans unaware of the impending crisis.

The speaker reflects on a recent conversation with Tucker and says there were things left unsaid that they would have liked to address more directly. They wish they had been more critical of current fiscal and monetary policy and had warned about a coming crisis more clearly. They feel the discussion didn’t go deep enough in this area, perhaps due to the direction of the conversation. They note that the interview spent a lot of time on gold, but not enough on why they believe gold will rise significantly in the future. There was also discussion of Bitcoin, but not as much focus as they would have preferred. The speaker spent a lot of time talking about the banking system and wanted to get out there the story of the bank, and to highlight corruption in the US government. However, they believe what is most relevant to the public is the corruption that will destroy their standard of living and the lies being told daily by the media, the government, the Trump administration, and the Federal Reserve. The speaker points to Donald Trump’s approval ratings on the economy as a notable indicator, describing them as at a record low. They argue this is significant because, despite the economy being touted as a strength, the public perceives otherwise. The speaker asserts that people know the economy is bad because of their own experiences, regardless of what is said on television. They reference the personal financial pressure that many face: a stack of bills they cannot pay, little to no savings, rising prices, and no relief in sight. In summary, the speaker expresses regret over not conveying a more critical view of economic policy and a stronger warning about an impending crisis, and laments that the conversation did not fully address why assets like gold should rise, or delve into Bitcoin as much as desired. They emphasize that the most consequential issues for the public are the alleged corruption affecting living standards and the harsh economic realities faced by ordinary people, which they believe contrast with the political and media narratives being presented. The overall message highlights a disconnect between what is publicly claimed about the economy and what people experience in their daily finances.