reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Who determined the number 420,987,987 regarding failed signatures from the 2020 election? That figure comes from analyzing a quarter of the 1,900,000 mail-in ballots in Maricopa County. We had 150 trained workers review the envelopes based on the secretary of state's guidelines, examining each voter record individually. After analyzing 25% of the ballots, we extrapolated the data to arrive at the final number. It's important to note that this analysis only pertains to Maricopa County, which had over 2 million ballots in total, with around 1.9 million being mail-in votes. Yes, that is correct. Thank you. Proceed.

A candidate was winning on election night, but California's voting system allows voting 30 days before the election and counting for 30 days after. Unlike Florida, which announces results on election night, California's system makes it easier to cheat. The candidate won narrowly, by about 2,000 votes in a state of 40 million, after weeks of ballot counting. Cheating is assumed, though not proven. This is suggested by a single-party state, machine politics, and inconsistent application of safeguards in vote counting. Some counties match signatures while others don't, despite legal requirements. Some counties ignore irregularities like missing ballot dates.

During the discussion, Speaker 1 mentions an interesting observation regarding the voter rolls. They found that 11,326 individuals who were not listed on the November 7th version of the voter rolls appeared on the December 4th version, despite showing as having voted in the recent election. Speaker 0 seeks an explanation for this discrepancy, emphasizing that they are not implying fraud but simply seeking answers. Speaker 1 admits they cannot think of a logical explanation and suggests reaching out to the county for clarification. The conversation ends there.

The speaker claims that real-time Edison data reveals election data manipulation. According to the speaker, Seidl receives raw election data directly from election officials in at least nine states. The speaker alleges that an additive process should show more votes, not deletions, in each interval report. However, a video of Edison reports allegedly shows pauses, oscillation, and deletions in total, in-person, and mail-in votes. The speaker claims this is the algorithm trying to figure out the math problem. The speaker points to North Carolina and Georgia counties as examples, noting Seidl directly contracts with Georgia. The speaker then plays a clip of someone discussing estimated vote percentages dropping, suggesting the reported results are not actual results. The speaker questions the calling of races with razor-thin margins, particularly Arizona, based on projections and alleged impossible data anomalies. The speaker asserts that historically, those counting votes called races, but now machines and news outlets do, deterring challenges.

I found that there were approximately 25,000 ballots in Maricopa County that were not printed from the official Dominion PDF ballot. These ballots had imperfections in the lines and circles, unlike the perfect PDF printing. The imperfections were consistent across all the ballots, suggesting they were not genuine. These 25,000 questionable ballots alone exceed Joe Biden's margin of victory by over double.

Fulton County reported 59,000 votes on Election Day, but the speaker believes the actual number is around 22,000, suggesting 37,000 votes were inserted. Evidence from Carter Jones, a consultant, shows that Fulton County had 21,843 votes with 655 provisionals. Notably, there is a screenshot from November 5th, a day and a half after the election, showing an incompatible number of open and closed polling places. A former employee, Dwight Brower, mentions about 14,000 people casting ballots. The transcript ends with a question about the confirmed vote count of 14,152 at 5 p.m.

Philip Davis identified approximately 4,000 fake double scan ballots in the Fulton County machine recount. Individuals who filed a case, Joe Rossi and Kevin Moncala, advised by Philip Davis, concluded with evidence that those 4,000 ballots were intentionally counted twice in the Fulton recount. In Georgia 2020, there were 3 vote counts. The first vote count had massive manipulation. In the second hand count, digital votes did not match the ballots, so the hand count was falsified to match the first machine count. In the third machine recount, ballots didn't match digital votes so the third count was falsified by double scanning ballots. The effort was to match the first count.

Maricopa County reported over 923,000 ballots dropped in drop boxes during the 2020 election. However, documentation accounts for only 189,167 ballots, leaving a deficit of 733,000 ballots. This indicates the election was not secure, and there are problems with the process. Laws were not adhered to or complied with. All evidence has been turned over to the attorney general. Every Democrat voted no in committee.

In the exchange, concerns are raised about mail-in ballots in Allegheny and Philadelphia counties and how they were counted. Speaker 0 notes that ballots were counted without observers, citing 682,770 ballots observed and asking about the 1,823,148 mailed-out ballots, contrasted with a final count showing 2,589,242 mail-in ballots. The core question is: what explains the roughly 700,000 mail-in ballots that “appeared from nowhere”? Speaker 1 responds that their cyber team uses white-hat hacking techniques to gather publicly available information from the secretary of state’s website, which has been updated as late as 11:16 this morning with provisional and mail-in ballots, though those numbers continue to change. He adds that the 2,500,000 figure is no longer on the website, and it has “just been taken off.” There is no annotation explaining why. Speaker 2 then describes an on-the-ground observation: a deputy sheriff, a senior law enforcement officer, was seen not being observed and walking in with baggies, with USBs being inserted into machines. The witness claims to have personally witnessed this 24 times, with additional witnesses including Democrat poll watchers. They were told by an attorney that every election leaves a couple of USB cards in the voting machines to be brought back by the warehouse manager, but this account is contradicted by law enforcement and other officials. The witness states that 47 USB cards are missing and “they’re nowhere to be found,” and that 32 to 30 cards uploaded were not present in the live vote update. The witness demanded timely live upload of vote results, which showed 50,000 votes; they assert those votes were for Vice President Biden, though they note that identifying who those votes were for should not matter to a computer scientist. Speaker 1 emphasizes that forensic evidence from the computers was not obtained: the procedure would involve turning off the computer, imaging the drive with BitLocker, under law enforcement observation, which would take about an hour for five machines. This forensic imaging was never performed, despite objections three weeks earlier. They later learned that virtually all chain-of-custody logs, yellow sheets, and forensic records in Delaware County were gone; a signing party attempted to recreate the logs with poll workers but was unsuccessful in recovering them all. The discussion concludes with a claim that there are 100,000 to 120,000 ballots, both mail-in and USB, in question, and that there is no remedy or “cure” within the local charter for certifying a presidential vote, leaving the speaker asserting that nobody could certify the vote in good conscience.

Fulton County reported 59,000 votes on Election Day, but the speaker believes the actual number is around 22,000, suggesting 37,000 votes were inserted. Evidence from Carter Jones, a consultant for Fulton County, shows that there were 21,843 votes with 655 provisionals. Notably, there is a screenshot from November 5th, a day and a half after the election, showing an incompatible number of open and closed polling places. During a special meeting on election night, an official record noted an inconsistent number of votes. A former employee of the Elections Division mentioned that around 14,000 people had cast ballots.

On November 9th, there was a mysterious occurrence where 25,000 ballots went missing in the reported count. The next day, on November 10th, these ballots magically appeared, affecting the outcome of the race. This doesn't make sense and is completely wrong. The law exists to safeguard the integrity of the vote.

The report claims Georgia’s 2020 election should not have been certified, arguing that election data entered by counties and the Secretary of State was never proved or verified as accurate, and that Georgia counties and the Secretary of State blocked open records requests for paper ballots. The report says Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger’s office, “through Ryan Germany,” instructed counties to refuse requests. It asserts the voting system was intended to provide an auditable paper trail via paper ballots and that state wording about making scanned ballot images available for public ballot counts was copied from Dominion marketing materials. It also claims Georgia counties deleted ballot images and references “a Franken count” in which a hand recount was required because “one million seven hundred thousand ballot images” were deleted. It reports open records request results from all 159 counties, stating 1.7 million missing ballots, and says a voter image tool and “Voter GA” reinforce that 74 counties could not produce original ballot images. It further claims that 48% of counties destroyed ballot images or refused to comply, six admitted having none, 22 admitted to having only recount images, and 28 admitted to partial originals (some mail-in, some in-person) with shortages. It claims Raffensperger counted 300,000 too many votes statewide and cites a Today Show appearance where Raffensperger said 4.7 million votes had been cast with “about two percent left to go.” The report says the video feed cut out as those numbers were being discussed. It also claims that at the time Raffensperger said 4.7 million ballots, 158 of 159 counties had reported, with Fulton County the only one still incomplete, and that official certification later showed roughly 4,998,482 votes (about 5 million). It argues this implies additional votes came in from Fulton County precincts, and raises a question about where “three hundred thousand extra ballots” came from, asserting that the paper ballots cannot be checked without access. The report focuses on Fulton County missing ballot images and authentication files. It claims Fulton County is missing 374,000 ballot images from the November 3 ballot count and 315,000 ballot images from advance voting, confirmed by county attorney Steven Rosenberg. It describes scanning outputs: a TIFF image, a results page attached to the TIFF, and a SHA authentication file meant to prove the image was not altered. It states Fulton County is missing 59,000 election-day ballot images and alleges ballot imaging was not required for the November 2020 election, though it claims Dominion’s contract required ballot images and SHA creation. It further claims Fulton County is missing nearly all SHA files: of 527,000 ballots, it alleges Fulton County provided only 16,000 SHA files to authenticate 527,000 ballots, and that it had 148,000 absentee-by-mail ballot images but far fewer SHA files. It also claims the December 9 final recount still lacked 18,000 ballot images. Next, the report alleges “unsigned tabulator tapes” for 315,000 votes certified by Fulton County. It presents claims that tabulator tapes printed without signatures and witnesses’ sign-offs were used to certify votes affecting 315,000 ballots, including duplicated serial numbers supposedly “impossible.” It references rules requiring tabulator tape verification, printing at least three tapes per scanner, and witness signatures or written reasons for non-signing. The report then alleges problems in Georgia’s “risk-limiting audit” process, calling it a “Franken count.” It cites a Secretary of State document stating that from November 11 to November 19 officials conducted a risk-limiting audit requiring a full manual count. The report quotes Philip Stark describing Georgia’s decision as a “Frankencount,” and it cites Carter Jones, a Fulton County consultant, alleging errors in the audit spreadsheet and claiming duplicates and miscounts. It states the report’s work found duplicate ballot counts and vote totals that resulted in “too many” votes for Biden and too many for Trump within a sample of absentee-by-mail ballots, and it argues that multiple counted batches did not match. The report says it also found recount problems and missing images in Fulton County after a December 9 recount, alleging 17,724 missing ballot images and that 3,125 ballot images were counted twice, while another statewide tool purportedly shows duplication across other counties. It further claims an “election day lie” about turnout in Fulton County. It contrasts the county’s reported 59,143 election-day votes with Carter Jones’s screenshot claiming about 21,843 election-day votes as of a specific timestamp (November 5 12:49 AM) and with meeting testimony from Dwight Brouwer asserting around 14,152 votes cast by about 5 PM, plus 598 provisional ballots. The report claims the math implies tens of thousands of additional votes were added quickly and contrasts that with purportedly low crowding and claims about the absence of long lines. It alleges precinct-level vote count mismatches between the initial count (November 3) and the December 9 recount by comparing ballot images for specific precincts and races, claiming ballots were removed and inserted. It lists examples of precincts where it claims large proportions of ballots differed between counts. The report also alleges that in the statewide recount Georgia still lacked over 500,000 ballot images, arguing this makes the vote count unverifiable without paper ballots. Additional claims include: - Logic and accuracy testing allegedly completed after early voting ended (it states testing should have been completed by October 5 but was completed October 31). - Allegations of ballot trafficking shown in videos and requests to view specific clips. - Claims that ballots can be changed or votes ignored via machine vulnerabilities, including a reference to “unclear ballot” demonstrations and an example of QR code signature mismatch affecting scanner handling (leading to misreads as provisional and missing subsequent ballots). - A quoted audit expert (Philip Stark) asserting the lack of basic accounting controls makes it impossible to determine who really won and that this is not limited to Fulton County. The report ends by asserting Georgia’s 2020 results are “totally unverifiable,” referencing archived official counts for late certification moments, and concludes with calls for Raffensperger and Brian Kemp to step down.

42,000 people in Nevada voted more than once, 1,500 were deceased, 19,000 didn't live in Nevada or attend college, 8,000 voted from a non-existent address, 15,000 were registered to vacant addresses, and 4,000 were noncitizens. The speaker asks if there are any ongoing prosecutions for voter fraud in Nevada, given the 130,000 instances identified in the 2020 election. The response is that there are currently no prosecutions.

This clip shows a live feed from Clarity Elections feeding the Associated Desk/Decision Desk HQ, with CNN-generated ribbons updating in real time. The current vote counts displayed are Andy Bashir with 673,948 votes and Matt Bevin with 662,235 votes, aligning with the CNN ribbon at that moment. The presenter then demonstrates the speed of the update by replaying the sequence: a flash update appears, the page fills with the new face, and the viewer sees what was missed in the brief instant between updates. He drags the footage frame by frame to illustrate the moment of change. In the next forward pass, the update from Clarity shows Bashir with 674,508 votes, while Bevin is at 661,675. This reflects a gain of 560 votes for Bashir and a corresponding loss of 560 votes for Bevin within the same split second. The presenter notes that the ribbon below has not yet updated to reflect the new totals, since the changes occur in split seconds. He emphasizes that this is a live demonstration of vote-switching in the computer: as more votes are tallied, Bashir climbs by 560 votes and Bevin drops by 560 votes almost simultaneously. The presenter points out that between the 560-vote gain and the 560-vote loss, 25% of the total loss amount in this race has occurred right before the viewers’ eyes. Key takeaways: - The feed is a live Clarity Elections data stream, with CNN ribbons updating in near real time. - An update shows Bashir gaining 560 votes (674,508 total) and Bevin losing 560 votes (661,675 total) in the same instant. - The ribbon update lags briefly behind the live tally, illustrating the speed and synchronization issues in live vote reporting. - The presenter highlights the phenomenon of vote-switching in the computer and quantifies the visible portion of the race’s loss happening during the demonstration (25%).

Speaker 0 presents a sequence of figures regarding Maricopa County’s 2020 election and asserts inconsistency between tallies and ballots. He begins: there were 2,595,272 registered voters; 2,089,512 voted at the close of business through election night and all counting; yet there were only 1,923,693 ballots existing. He notes, “They called the election at 2,089,512 votes,” but emphasizes that the closing canvas shows a different number, counting the actual codes on paper rather than pieces of paper, yielding 1,923,693 numbers that show up. After post-adjudication, he lists key observations. By the time voting closed, 165,819 ballots were missing, which he states is 7.94% of the votes in 2020, and they could not explain where they were. However, about a month later in Arizona, a new total was produced: 2,086,959, still leaving 2,553 ballots missing as of that adjustment. He notes that Biden was said to have won by 10,500 votes. He then describes a process he calls the “time hack,” alleged to have been used to gain extra counting time—a practice he claims is new to 2020 and has continued in subsequent elections. He asserts that they “picked up, i.e., manufactured 163,266 ballots that never existed.” He questions how ballots could enter the system after the fact if they did not exist beforehand, asserting this as evidence of manipulation. To support the claim, he cites machine outputs: “Maricopa printed 04/7968 ballots for Maricopa,” while there were only 2,595,272 registered voters, yet 4,027,968 ballots printed. He states these numbers come directly from the machines and argues that no one scrutinizes them deeply enough. He asks why Maricopa would print 1,432,696 overprints, suggesting that to fabricate missing numbers, “backwards ballots” are needed to fill those gaps during the time hack. The argument continues that ballots must be suspended from hitting the bottom line—“don’t let them hit the bottom line”—and, once the numbers are known, could be replaced with whatever is needed. He implies that such suspended ballots are not present in either the pre- or post-audit tallies. Finally, he asserts that a proper audit would have all numbers cross-referencing across every manifestation; otherwise, the cross-referencing would reveal the inconsistencies. The overall gist is a claim of missing ballots, late adjustments, a large number of overprints, and a so-called time hack used to manipulate counts, with an emphasis on the need for cross-referenced auditing.

In the 2020 election, Maricopa County reported 923,000 drop box ballots, but only 189,167 have documentation, leaving 733,000 unaccounted for. This shows election insecurity. Evidence was given to the attorney general, with all Democrats voting against in committee.

The discussion centers on the significance of findings in a released public report. The speaker says the final report still shows that 20,344 to 23,344 mail-in ballots were mailed to an address where the voter no longer lived, yet votes were cast on those ballots, in an election decided by 10,000 votes. The speaker repeats the key figure: 23,344 mail-in ballots were mailed to an address that an individual no longer lived at after moving away. They explain that the data source used is National Change of Address forms completed through the post office when someone moves and requests mail forwarding to a new address. The speaker emphasizes that the analysis did not rely on neighbors’ statements about whether someone moved; it relied on these National Change of Address records. According to the speaker, the National Change of Address forms indicate the individual moved to another location, “yet those votes were cast.” The speaker states they cannot think of an explanation that makes logical sense, though they say that through experience working with such data they sometimes find possible explanations after initially seeing no explanation. Even so, they assert that the Attorney General needs to answer why votes were cast in relation to addresses no longer occupied. They conclude by reiterating the election context: the election was determined by 10,000 votes, while the issue involves about 23,344 mail-in ballots, calling it “just one thing.”

Speaker 0 visits a location in California described as “home to a porta john and a giant empty parking lot,” yet inside this empty lot there are “registered voters.” He states that there are “26 registered voters for this exact location. 100 Sunset Avenue in Venice. 26 people registered to a porta john and an empty parking lot. Where do their ballots go exactly? So who's picking up the ballots? Who's voting for the people in this lovely porta john empty lot? Ask the question.” He concludes, “I think you know the answer.”

The speaker asks who determined the number of failed signatures in the 2020 election. Speaker 1 explains that their organization reviewed 25% of the 1,900,000 envelopes from the election and analyzed each voter record individually. They extrapolated the statistics from the first 25% to determine the final number, which is specific to Maricopa County. Speaker 0 points out that Maricopa County alone had over 2 million ballots, and their group analyzed 25% of the mail-in ballots to arrive at the 420,987 failed signature verification number. Speaker 1 confirms this.

- The evidence, through eyewitness testimony corroborated by others, shows that a 130,000 to 280,000 completed ballots for the twenty twenty general election were shipped from Bethpage, New York to Lancaster, Pennsylvania, where those ballots and the trailer in which they were shipped disappeared. - On October 21, there was a series of unusual events that cannot be a coincidence. I know I saw ballots with return addresses filled out, thousands of them, thousands, loaded onto my trailer in New York and headed for Pennsylvania. At first, I didn't think it was a big deal. In fact, I thought it was really awesome. I was like, sweet. I'm doing something for the presidential race. You know? This is cool. But as things became weirder, I got to thinking and wondered why I was driving complete ballots from New York to Pennsylvania. I didn't know why, so I decided to speak up. And that's what I'm doing today. - It could be a 144 to over, to a quarter million ballots. Part of our developing investigation indicates that Jesse wasn't alone. There was a number, as in like a bunch of different trucks which engaged in this. So when you think about the magnitude of potential votes showing up the night of the election after midnight, you have to have an artifact. So if you eliminate the impossible with all things being equal, whatever remains must be the truth. The truth is ballot showed up. They were counted. They do not match necessarily the records of who should have voted. In some instances, the stats don't add up, and we continue to analyze that. - With that said, I believe beyond a shadow of a doubt, we have evidence of a massive transfer of completed curated ballots ready to be injected into counting centers.

Maricopa County reported over 923,000 ballots deposited in drop boxes during the 2020 election. However, documentation accounts for only 189,167 ballots, leaving a deficit of 733,000 ballots. This indicates the election was not secure, with process problems and a failure to adhere to laws. All evidence has been given to the attorney general. Every Democrat voted no in committee.

Robert Beetles of Reno, Nevada says his name and location should be added to the permanent record under NRS. He then discusses “treason,” stating that every Democrat, Republican, and Independent in the room has been “robbed” of their vote by the register of voters in Washoe County. Beetles says that on Valentine’s Day, eight days before his remarks, he and others obtained a disk from the register of voters that contains voter-roll data. He claims they pulled the voter rolls three additional times over the past year and a half to two years to confirm findings in newer data. He states that Spicua’s register-of-voters disk shows the following voter numbers: for 2020, 252,000 voters are claimed, while his data shows 212,000 in 2020; 188,000 in 2018; 181,000 in 2018; 216,000 in 2016; 210,083 in 2016; 128,054 in 2012; and 188,054 in 2012. He highlights what he calls a “full stop” for 2020, asserting there are “forty thousand more votes than we had voters” in the 2020 election, and states that in 2018 there were 77,000, in 2016 there were 126,000, and in 2012 there were 133,000 “more votes than voters.” He argues that, because of these discrepancies, “every Democrat, Republican, Independent” has been robbed of their vote, calling the election system in Washoe “a fraud,” and saying the situation is “even worse” when considering “machines, the dead people, the out of state people, and all the other fraud.” He then characterizes Spicua as guilty of “gross incompetence at best, treason at worst,” and states that Spicua “has stolen from everyone in this room and county and country,” saying she “must be removed immediately.” Beetles questions whether four officials know what happened, asking whether the resolution’s format was manipulated by the county and then pulled by the county for being in the wrong format, and whether they are trying to cover up treason. He asks whether they will bring Spicua out to tell “fairy tales about how great our election system is,” and says the attendees should either fire Spicua or “lock her up.” He asks whether Hartung knew about the fraud, suggesting Hartung refused to chair the resolution for that reason. He warns that if the issue is not addressed immediately, the officials would be guilty of treason “except Jeannie,” whom he portrays as the only one fighting for fair elections, and he asks for evidence she is not alone. He concludes by urging them to either put the resolution back on the agenda and fix the fraud or face treason.

Philip Davis identified approximately 4,000 fake double-scan ballots in Fulton County's machine recount. Individuals who filed the case, Joe Rossi and Kevin Mokla, advised by Philip Davis, have concluded with evidence that those 4,000 ballots were intentionally counted twice in the Fulton recount. There were three vote counts in Georgia 2020. The first vote count had massive manipulation. In the second count, the digital votes did not match the ballots, so they falsified the hand count to match the first machine count. In the third count, the ballots didn't match the digital votes, so they falsified the third count by double scanning ballots. The whole effort was to match that first count.