TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

In 2015, Josh Roche proposed a plan for the EU to accept 1 million asylum seekers yearly, issue euro bonds for financing, and establish safe channels for migrants. He accuses George Soros' NGO of influencing EU institutions to implement this plan, which he believes undermines Christian and national political forces in Europe. This migration issue is not random but part of a deliberate agenda.

In 2015, Josh Roche published a plan stating the EU must accept at least 1 million asylum seekers annually. Financing is critical, and he proposed issuing long-term Euro bonds to finance the migration crisis, including migrants' social welfare. Safe channels must be established for asylum seekers, starting by transporting them from Greece and Italy to destination countries, including Hungary and Austria. This is not accidental but a deliberate plan. The speaker claims they are fighting an organized gang called the Empire of George Soros and NGOs. They allege this group supports those transgressing the legal system, finances illegal activity, and aims to capture main positions inside EU institutions by buying out MPs and leaders. The speaker asserts this plan aims to change Europe, push aside Christian, conservative, and national-based political leaders and voters from EU decision-making bodies, and that migration is not just about migration.

In 2015, George Soros proposed a plan involving the EU accepting 1 million asylum seekers annually, issuing euro bonds for financing, and establishing safe channels for migrants. This plan is seen as an organized effort to change Europe by sidelining conservative, Christian, and national-based political leaders. Soros is accused of influencing EU institutions and supporting illegal activities against nations. The focus is not just on migration, but on reshaping the European Union's decision-making process.

In 2015, George Soros proposed a plan to the EU, calling for the acceptance of 1 million asylum seekers annually, issuing euro bonds for funding, and creating safe channels for migrants. This plan is seen as an organized effort to change Europe by influencing EU institutions and sidelining Christian conservative leaders. Critics argue that Soros and NGOs are undermining national sovereignty.

In 2015, George Soros proposed a plan for the EU to accept 1 million asylum seekers annually and issue euro bonds for financing. He emphasized safe channels for migrants to reach their destination countries, including Hungary. This plan is seen as an organized effort to change Europe by influencing EU institutions and sidelining conservative leaders and voters. The focus is not just on migration, but on broader political objectives.

The Obama administration, and even the early Trump administration, used taxpayer money to support the socialist government in Albania. This involved partnering with George Soros on projects aimed at weakening the independence of the Albanian judiciary. This wasn't isolated to Albania; similar activities occurred in Romania, Hungary, Guatemala, and Colombia. Soros, a billionaire, doesn't need this funding, yet the State Department and USAID enabled his influence, allowing him to shape foreign policy and even review funding applications. This taxpayer funding, the speaker argues, indirectly subsidizes Soros’s activities, both domestically and internationally, and is a way for the State Department to oppose conservative agendas. The speaker highlights this as an example of the government funding groups that oppose American interests, while right-leaning organizations are largely ignored. Legal action was necessary to obtain the documents revealing these activities.

The United Nations is confirmed to be funding the migrant crisis, as revealed by the Center for Immigration Studies. Public documents show that the United Nations plans to allocate $372 million in cash and voucher assistance to approximately 624,000 immigrants heading to the United States in 2024. This information eliminates any need for speculation, and the article link is provided for further reading.

Europe has accepted over 100 million refugees in the past decade, so taking in another 1.5 million would not be a problem. The speaker believes that the land is promised to them, so they are not concerned about the refugees suffering. They mention knowing the location of live hostages but are not taking action because Biden requested them not to.

George Soros's Open Society Foundations have been revealed to be actively trying to influence political processes in Europe and Russia through funding local advocacy groups, social media projects, and journalists. For example, they provided over $130,000 to EU Observer, which used professional news reporting to promote open society values during the European elections. Additionally, leaked documents show the organization's half a million dollar effort to find evidence of Russia's alleged influence in European politics, although they acknowledge the challenges of accusing Russia. Some critics argue that Soros aims to disrupt Europe and promote open borders, referring to his version of democracy as "Sorosocracy."

The speaker outlines a project to map US State Department involvement with George Soros, The Open Society Foundations, and related entities across many countries, noting that the WikiLeaks cables (Kissinger, Carter, and Cablegate) cover 1973–2010 but omit the 1980s and 1990s. The goal is to create a comprehensive picture of how US policy has aligned with “George Soros, The Open Society Foundation, The Open Society Institute, every open society spandrel in every country.” The speaker highlights that Strobe Talbott in 1995 said US foreign policy had to be synchronized with allied governments and with Soros, describing it as “like working with a friendly, allied, independent entity, if not a government,” and stating that Soros then became “the number one political downer.” The narrative begins with precedents before the Open Society Foundation’s creation in 1979. In 1973–1975, Soros references appear in cables before the Open Society Foundation started. The speaker then focuses on a troubling example from 1976 in Gabon, via a Kissinger cable titled Visit by Brown and Root Executives to Gabon. Brown and Root, later Halliburton, is connected to George Soros through Brown and Root’s executives and projects. The CIA’s reaction to a Ramparts article about Brown and Root is discussed, showing Herman Brown (founder of Brown and Root) and his son George Rufus Brown as covert associates with the CIA under project LP coin, with Herman Brown serving as president and director of Brown and Root and trustee of the Brown Foundation. The claim is that both Herman Brown and his son had covert security clearances and were involved with CIA projects from 1965–1967, including potential service on the board of a CIA creation in Thailand/Laos. Brown and Root is described as one of Soros’s top five holdings in the mid-2000s, implying a CIA-connected origin for the company. A note is given that in Gabon, Soros Associates (founded by Paul Soros, George Soros’s older brother) is involved in port projects. Paul Soros’s shipping and engineering influence is illustrated by a Washington Post obituary, and the speaker mentions a related anecdote from Bill Burns’s autobiography The Back Channel about embassy construction projects in Russia being prebugged, and the implication that Western engineering firms with ties to intelligence could have facilitated spying. Before Open Society Foundations existed, in June 1975 Bandar Abbas Port Project in Iran involved three senior Dravo Corporation executives, plus International Systems, Van Houten Associates, and Soros Associates. The embassy was instructed to assist American bidders to ensure Soros Associates’ bid, noting Soros Associates’ engineering focus and the aim to eliminate competing bids. The government of Iran’s consideration of the American group and the influence of Soros’s bid on Iran’s judgment are documented. In Gabon, 1975–1976, financing arrangements are described: a financing package for Soros’s contract including a down payment by the Gabonese governor, an Export-Import Bank direct loan, and a First National City Bank loan, with the U.S. embassy consulting to emphasize more favorable terms and to potentially extend financing into a larger package. The accounts emphasize multiple U.S. government roles: Commerce Department, State Department, Export-Import Bank, and embassies, colluding to support Soros financing and projects, with the claim that this occurred years before the Open Society Foundations were created and began collaborating with U.S. agencies. The speaker suggests a long-standing family involvement, with older brother Paul Soros already coordinating with the State Department to secure deals for Soros Associates before 1979. The Mongolia story is promised as a later highlight. The compilation is framed as a five-decade pattern of government support for Soros-related deals, starting in 1973 and continuing through the Cablegate era.

European leaders favoring restrictive migration policies are meeting in Budapest following Hungary's vote to criminalize those aiding asylum seekers, a move defying the EU and human rights groups. Austrian Chancellor Kurz and Hungarian leader Orban, both immigration hardliners, are attending. Hungary also outlawed EU attempts to relocate asylum seekers. Orban views himself as the defender of Christian Europe against a perceived Muslim invasion, a rhetoric that led to his election victory. The "Stop Soros" campaign was popular, despite Hungary having one of the EU's lowest immigration rates. Soros is seen as the personification of a foreign invasion. Human rights groups are disappointed and hope for intervention from the EU and the Council of Europe, which is reviewing the bill. The European Commission is expected to react, but human rights organizations risk jail sentences if they help illegal immigrants apply for asylum. The EU has warned Hungary before, but Orban continues to defy them. The EU can threaten, but excluding a member state is difficult and unpopular. A mini-summit on migration is planned in Brussels this weekend. Despite low immigration numbers, the issue remains urgent, highlighting a gap between reality and perception.

European leaders favoring restrictive migration policies are meeting in Budapest following Hungary's vote to criminalize individuals or groups aiding asylum seekers. This move defies the EU and human rights groups. Austrian Chancellor Kurtz and Hungarian leader Orban, both immigration hardliners, are attending. Hungary also outlawed EU attempts to relocate asylum seekers. Orban views himself as the defender of Christian Europe against a perceived Muslim invasion, a rhetoric that led to his election victory. The "Stop Soros" campaign, popular in Hungary, paints George Soros as the organizer of this "invasion," despite Hungary having low immigration rates. Human rights groups are disappointed and look to the EU and the Council of Europe for recourse. The EU Commission is expected to react, but Orban has defied the EU before. While the EU can threaten sanctions, excluding a member state is difficult, especially with rising populist support. A mini-summit on migration is planned in Brussels, highlighting the issue's urgency despite low immigrant numbers.

In 2015, George Soros published a plan to bring millions of illegal immigrants to the US and Europe, as noted by Hungary's Viktor Orban. Soros proposed the EU accept at least a million asylum seekers annually and establish safe channels for their relocation from Greece and Italy to other EU countries. Orban's criticism of Soros is attributed to his opposition to these policies.

Speaker 0: In time, Europe has not yet learned how to be multicultural. And I think we're gonna be part of the throes of that transformation, which must take place. Europe is not gonna be the monolithic societies that they once were in the last century. Speaker 1: Now, I think we have a moral and political and social and economic obligation to look after refugees. You can't you have three alternatives. Leave them on the beaches. Send them back to have their throats slit in Syria, or let them walk up to the Balkans into razor wire borders, or welcome them. Those are the only alternatives. Speaker 0: Jews are gonna be at the center of that. It's a huge transformation for Europe to make. They are now going into a multicultural mode and Jews will be resented because of our leading role. But without that leading role and without that transformation, Europe will not survive. Speaker 2: There are 65,000,000 displaced people in the world right now. Matthew, that number is larger than the population of The United Kingdom, and it's not getting any smaller. What we've seen here is that governments are absolutely feckless in attempting to broker peace agreements, be it Syria or anywhere else, which has created this. Speaker 3: Billionaire George Soros says he's investing $500,000,000 to start ups founded by refugees. Soros is responding to president Barack Obama's call to action initiative. That's a request for companies to help refugees and migrants. Speaker 4: And Norwegian society has a very a very short history with ethnic minorities at a scale. So there is a job to be done. So we do have rising antisemitism, and we have rising antisignism, and we have Islamophobia, and we have racism. So we have a lot to do. So we still have have a need of NGOs like the center against racism. Speaker 5: But then he dismissed out of hand what the Prime Minister is doing in relation to migration. Now, I happen to believe that people in this country don't want to pull the drawbridges up, actually. But they do want a fair system. They don't want a free fall. They don't like this sense that people can come here and take us for a ride. And the point, Evan, is this. That in other member states, they have a contributory system of social insurance. I've seen it and discussed it in different contexts. So that people are sort of working and paying their taxes and putting in before they have the right to take out. Speaker 6: The European Union was intentionally set up to give minority organizations influence on the management of Europe. Harry Truman read an article about Kalergi in 1945. He was so impressed that he adopted the Kalergi plan as US official policy as well. After 1965, the real demographic changes of European countries would be seen. Brock Schisholm, former director of the World Health Organization said, what people in all places have to do is to limit a birth rate and promote mixed marriages between different races. This aims to create a single race in the world which will be directed by a central authority. Speaker 7: Very clear that the Jews want to exterminate the European race and that the means to weakening the European race would be to dissolve all the European nations, destroy all their cultural heritage and their national traditions and replace that with the European Union and then to invite in Africans, Middle Easterners and Asians to dilute the blood of Europeans through miscegenation to the point where they became a degenerate mixed race.

Data Republican released a tool indexing the National Endowment for Democracy Journal, aggregating authors, articles, and NGOs. The speaker claims this tool proves George Soros and the government collaborate. The National Endowment for Democracy is described as a government-financed NGO involved in intelligence operations, with congressional representatives. The speaker highlights authors in the journal affiliated with the Open Society Foundation, asserting that many Open Society Foundation people write for the journal. The speaker points to numerous mentions of Open Society Foundations in the journal's articles. The speaker concludes that this demonstrates the government's deep involvement with George Soros, portraying him as a deep insider within the intelligence community.

George Soros is a foreign-born, left-wing individual who aims to change the nature of our country. Leaked memos reveal three key points: a belief in their success at influencing global immigration policy, the refugee crisis as an opportunity to further this influence, and the perception of the refugee crisis as the new normal. Soros is a strong supporter of open borders, advocating for unrestricted movement for all. He views the immigration crisis as a means to advance his broader immigration agenda.

In September 2015, Josh Roche outlined a comprehensive plan for addressing the migration crisis, proposing that the EU accept at least one million asylum seekers annually. He emphasized the need for additional financing, suggesting long-term euro bonds to support migrants' welfare upon arrival. A key aspect of his plan involved establishing safe channels for asylum seekers, particularly from Greece and Italy to Hungary. This situation is not merely a series of random events but part of a deliberate strategy. There are concerns about organizations, referred to as the "Empire of George Soros," that allegedly support illegal activities undermining national regulations. The broader issue encompasses the transformation of Europe, aiming to marginalize Christian and conservative political forces from decision-making within the EU.

Josh Roche published a plan in 2015 calling for the EU to accept 1 million asylum seekers annually and issue euro bonds for funding. He proposed safe channels for asylum seekers to reach their destination countries, including Hungary. This plan is seen as part of a larger effort by George Soros and NGOs to influence European Union decision-making against Christian and national-based political forces.

I outline the speaker’s central claims about George Soros, the CIA, and global political influence. The speaker contends that George Soros has been one of the CIA’s most valuable private assets for over forty years, acting as the civilian, deniable funding arm of American regime-change operations worldwide. Because of this, Soros is not only allowed in the United States but protected there, enabling him to operate with impunity, which the speaker says explains his arrogance and continued influence. The speaker traces a pattern of Soros-backed “color revolutions” starting with Serbia in 2000, refined in Georgia in 2003, Ukraine in 2004, and the Arab Spring in 2011. They assert that logos for USAID, the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), and the Open Society Foundations appear in all these cases, framing Soros as central to these movements. According to the speaker, the Arab Spring served as a trial run for Europe’s migrant crisis. They claim that in 2011 the CIA and Soros turned that playbook on Libya and Syria. Gaddafi allegedly warned in March 2011 that removing him would unleash millions to flood Europe from Africa; eight months later, Gaddafi was dead, Libya descended into chaos, and migrant waves began as predicted. By 2015–2016, the speaker asserts, battle-hardened jihadists and economic migrants were crossing the Mediterranean with iPhones, prepaid cards, and Twitter guides written in Arabic, described as the same social media mobilization tactics used in Kyiv and Tahrir Square. Wayne Madsen is cited as having called this pattern out in 2015, described by the speaker as a deliberate CIA social-engineering operation to fracture Europe from within, applying the same playbook to new targets. The speaker then asserts that the United States has been subject to this strategy from 2020 to the present, pointing to the summer riots of 2020 as an example. The claim continues that Soros’s Open Society Foundations donated at least $33,000,000 to groups that organized and sustained the 2020 riots, and that Soros-backed NGOs provided lawyers, maps, and logistics for the southern border caravans, as well as funding to influence police departments and district attorneys in major cities, effectively helping to elect them. The speaker argues that Soros is implementing the color-revolution playbook “on us now,” with the target being ordinary Americans rather than foreign nations. A historical reference is made to JFK, who allegedly spoke of splintering the CIA after the Bay of Pigs betrayal, a chance JFK did not realize, leaving the world the speaker claims the CIA built. The speaker notes that Hungary, a country of 9 million, has passed Stop Soros laws and expelled his operations, asking why the United States cannot do the same, and suggests finishing what JFK started.

In this video, Speaker 0 asks Speaker 1 if they are responsible for the financial collapses in several countries. Speaker 1 admits to being involved in all of them but clarifies that they are only focused on making money and don't consider the social consequences. Speaker 0 then questions which version of George Soros they are speaking to, the amoral or moral one. Speaker 1 explains that they are one person who sometimes engages in amoral activities but tries to be moral most of the time.

Data Republican released a tool indexing the National Endowment for Democracy Journal, aggregating authors, articles, and NGOs. The speaker claims this journal proves George Soros and the government work together. The National Endowment for Democracy is described as a government-financed NGO involved in intelligence operations, with congressional representatives. The tool identifies authors in the journal affiliated with the Open Society Foundation, which is George Soros. The speaker highlights the number of articles in the journal mentioning Open Society Foundations. The speaker concludes that this demonstrates the government's deep involvement with George Soros, portraying him as a deep insider within the intelligence community.

George Soros has been a target of misinformation and conspiracies since the 1990s, often portrayed as part of a globalist agenda. His Open Society Foundation has funded various initiatives, including support for migrant integration and democracy-building efforts. Critics argue that his influence extends to funding protests and movements in the U.S., including those opposing Israel. Allegations suggest that Soros indirectly supports groups through fiscal sponsors, complicating the tracking of donations. Discussions also touch on the ideological subversion tactics used by leftist organizations, with claims that they aim to reshape American perceptions and governance. Amidst these controversies, the narrative emphasizes a perceived threat to national security and the integrity of American values. The ongoing struggle against globalist influences is framed as a fight for sovereignty and identity.

George Soros, a Hungarian billionaire, is disliked in Hungary and many other nations for his attempts to influence governments. He was the first person to meet with Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez after his election, as reported in Spain. Despite being questioned about this meeting, Sánchez has never responded in parliament. It is interesting to see the alliance between the left and extreme left with globalist billionaires. This alliance contradicts their previous anti-globalization stance and allows these billionaires to dictate how we should live while they live luxuriously.

Speaker 0: Argues Europe has not yet learned to be multicultural and will undergo a transformation; Europe will no longer be monolithic, and Jews will be at the center of this transformation. They claim Jews will be resented for their leading role, but without that leading role and transformation Europe will not survive. Speaker 1: States a moral, political, social, and economic obligation to look after refugees, presenting three alternatives: leave refugees on beaches, send them back to be killed in Syria, or let them walk into razor-wire borders, or welcome them. Speaker 0: Reiterates that Jews will be at the center of Europe’s transformation and that Jews will be resented for their leading role; without this leading role and transformation, Europe will not survive. Speaker 2: Cites 65,000,000 displaced people worldwide, a number larger than the UK’s population, noting that governments are feckless in broker peace agreements (e.g., Syria), which has created this situation. Speaker 3: Reports that billionaire George Soros says he is investing $500,000,000 to start-ups founded by refugees, in response to Barack Obama’s call to action initiative asking companies to help refugees and migrants. Speaker 4: Notes that Norwegian society has a short history with ethnic minorities at scale and asserts there is work to do; mentions rising antisemitism, Islamophobia, and racism, and the ongoing need for NGOs like the Center Against Racism. Speaker 5: Responds to criticism of the Prime Minister’s migration policy, suggesting that people in the country do not want to close themselves off but do want a fair system; describes a contributory social insurance system in other member states where people pay taxes before they can draw benefits, implying a preference for a sustainable, earned access to benefits. Speaker 6: States that the European Union was designed to give minority organizations influence in Europe’s management; references Kalergi and a 1945 article read by Harry Truman, claiming Truman adopted Kalergi’s plan as U.S. policy; asserts that after 1965 real demographic changes would be seen; cites Brock Chisholm, former WHO director, claiming the goal is to limit birth rates and promote mixed marriages to create a single world race under a central authority. Speaker 7: Concludes with the claim that Jews want to exterminate the European race and that the strategy to weaken Europe involves dissolving European nations, destroying cultural heritage and national traditions, replacing them with the European Union, and inviting Africans, Middle Easterners, and Asians to dilute the blood of Europeans through miscegenation to produce a degenerate mixed race.