reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker argues that the Haiti Temporary Protected Status (TPS) program, created after the 2010 earthquake, has been mismanaged for over a decade. What began as a temporary measure has effectively become permanent, with thousands of Haitians remaining in the United States under TPS due to repeated renewals. The speaker challenges the commonly cited numbers about how many TPS holders could be removed from health care, stating that those figures are a fraction of the total and that a large share of TPS beneficiaries are not in health care. The speaker contrasts this with the claim that a large portion of TPS recipients came to the U.S. illegally, stating that 91% of Haiti TPS holders entered the country illegally and are now using TPS status to stay. They argue that the program was not designed to allow ongoing entry and stay, and that its current form undermines efforts to curb abuse of the program and to enforce immigration laws. A notable point raised is that the program’s weakness has real-life consequences. The speaker cites a violent incident in Florida a week earlier, where a mother was brutally murdered outside a convenience store by a Haitian individual, linking the crime to concerns about TPS and President Biden’s handling of immigration policy. The speaker also references other crimes, including murders on a subway in Charlotte, to illustrate the perceived danger and risk to Americans. The overarching claim is that millions of dollars and taxpayer resources are being used to support a program that has become effectively permanent and that it continues to flood the United States with people who are allegedly exploiting TPS and not integrating as promised. The speaker contends that the goal of the bill is not achieved, arguing that people should come to the United States to follow laws and contribute to society rather than to exploit goodwill or pose risks to the American public. In conclusion, the speaker asserts that the bill is flawed and should not be supported by either party, and yields back.

This bill is described as a pipeline to the criminal justice system for parents. The speaker opposes criminalizing parents for wanting to love their children.

I'm heading out to vote on the Lake and Riley Act, which addresses the tragic case of a young girl in Georgia who was murdered by an illegal immigrant. This bill mandates that the Department of Homeland Security detain illegal immigrants charged with crimes like burglary and theft. It also allows state attorneys general to sue the DHS for not adhering to this requirement. Unfortunately, I expect most Democrats to oppose this common-sense legislation. It's crucial for voters to consider the character of those they support. By the way, President Carter's body will soon be lying in state. Thank you for your support.

Kamala Harris sucks.

The resolution was adopted with 219 yays and 208 nays. The motion to reconsider was laid on the table.

The votes are in: 111 in favor and 364 against. The motion has been rejected. Unlock.

The rule 183-1-13-05 regarding poll watchers' tablets is passed with a vote of 3 to 1.

The speaker acknowledges that people will be hurt by a vote. They state that they worked hard to achieve a budget deal that would exclude the provision that caused the harm.

I'm not as eloquent as my colleagues, but politicians voting for this bill own the consequences. American people expect us to fight, not just slow down the country's destruction. We need to pick principled fights, like stopping the border invasion. To the American people: pay attention and stop sending politicians who talk one way and vote another. I'm a strong no on this bill.

Speaker 0 asks if the person really wants Tom Emmer to be speaker, as they did not vote for congressman Jim Jordan. Speaker 1 responds that they do not like Tom Emmer and think it is a terrible job. Speaker 0 clarifies that they voted for someone they don't like because they didn't want to vote for Jim.

House Bill thirteen twelve is under consideration. An "aye" vote is recorded. A "no" vote is recorded. The "aye" votes prevail. House Bill thirteen twelve has passed.

House Bill thirteen twelve is under consideration. An "aye" vote signifies approval, while a "no" vote signifies opposition. The vote is conducted. The "aye" votes prevail. House Bill thirteen twelve is passed.

To pass my amendment, the Senate must remove Democrat leaders blocking it. I propose a vote on whether American taxpayer money should be used to fly illegal immigrants from Venezuela and Haiti into the US. President Biden has secretly flown 320,000 illegal aliens into Blue City airports in 2023. Vote against me to stop this practice. Time has expired.

In the post from earlier today, two Republicans voted nay to stall the government funding bill, but it ended up being only one again: Thomas Massey. The comments that followed labeled Massey a rhino, a democrat, and a grandstander. The speaker then presents Massey’s own explanation for voting against the omnibus, highlighting a breakdown of what Massey calls the most ridiculous items included, including some “America first” items that were not. Massey’s stated rationale includes: - $5,000,000,000 to provide cash benefits, health care, day care, and job programs to refugees on the taxpayer dime. - $315,000,000 to fund the CIA’s branch of the State Department that propagandizes and destabilizes the globe and has an interest in censoring and attacking conservative media outlets. - $3,300,000,000 to our greatest ally, President Trump, with an extra $500,000,000 for the greatest ally. - $1,500,000,000 to Egypt. - $2,100,000,000 to the Jordanians. - Nearly $700,000,000 to foreign HIV/AIDS programs. - Additional items described as America first that Massey says they refused to include. Massey also cites amendments he would have supported but were blocked: - The amendment to freeze funds for the daycare fraud. - The amendment to stop warrantless surveillance of Americans via loopholes in the FISA act. - The amendment to prevent the kill switch on your personal vehicle. - The amendment to end propagandizing US citizens by the State Department and the US Agency for Global Media. - The amendment to stop the creation of CBNCs (which relates to financial surveillance and control of your wall). - The Save Act was included by someone, described as “Grimstander” in the narrative. The discourse portrays Massey as a traitor to America and a grandstander, with tweets and reactions framing him as disloyal to President Trump. The speaker’s compilation emphasizes that if Massey is called a traitor for these positions, others might be viewed similarly, urging readers to compare actions across the broader political landscape.

HR 7909 will be voted on in the House tonight. The bill would immediately deport illegals who harm women and kids. Every member of Congress should vote to protect women and kids tonight. We need to stop illegals from hunting our women.

The transcript shows a parliamentary division. The Speaker states: “The eyes to the right, 111. The nose to the left, 364. The eyes to the right were 111, the nose to the left, 364. So the noes have it. The noes have it.” Following this, the question is: “that the bill be now read a second time as many as are of that opinion say aye. Aye. Of the contrary, no. No.”

Senator Souda's office stated she opposes changing rules on legislation. People need to decide where they stand on protecting rights amid efforts to restrict them.

The ayes are 206, the nays are 222. The resolution is not adopted. Motion reconsidered is laid upon the table. Pursuant to clause eight of rule 20, unfinished business is on the vote of the motion of the gentleman in Missouri, Mr. Smith, to suspend the rules. HR one four nine one as amended is in order. The clerk will report the title.

The speaker acknowledges that people will be hurt by a specific vote. They state that they worked hard to achieve a budget deal that would exclude a particular provision.

The amendment was put to a vote. Those in favor signified by saying aye; those opposed say no. The chair ruled the noes have it, and the amendment is not agreed to. A roll call was requested. The roll call results were: - Missus Fishbach: No - Mister Norman: Yes - Mister Roy: No - Missus Houchin: No - Mister Langworthy: No - Mister Scott: No - Mister Griffith: No - Mister Jack: No - Mister McGovern: Aye - Miss Gantlin: Aye - Mister Nugoose: Aye - Miss Ledger Fernandez: Aye - Madam chair: No The clerk reported the total as 5 yeas and 7 nays. The amendment remains not agreed to. The chair indicated that what’s appropriate will be released when it is time for the president to release it.

Amber, both Barack Obama and I do not support redefining marriage from a civil perspective. We do not support gay marriage.

The proceeding included a brief inquiry about closing statements before a roll call vote. The roll call began as the chair announced the vote would be by roll call. Roll call votes recorded in the transcript: - Chair votes aye. - Representatives with listed votes: Schultz yes; Holland no; Allen yes; Coulter no; Frederick no; Howard no; Jacob yes; Jordan no; Cagle no; Nash yes; Pursell no; Scott yes; Steer yes; Zalesnikar yes. - The transcript does not show representative Weiner’s individual vote, though the roll call note indicates the vote included Weiner. Outcome: - There were eight ayes and eight nays, and the motion does not prevail. - This concludes the agenda for today.

Speaker is asked if they agree with congressional Republicans' call for resignation, but does not respond when pressed by the speaker of the house.

The speaker acknowledges that people will be hurt by a particular vote. They state that they worked hard to achieve a budget deal that would avoid the provision that led to the negative impact.

Speaker 0 states: 'The house voted today to censure Ilhan Omar and remove her from her committee committees.' Four Republicans voted with the Democrats: from Nebraska, Colorado, California, and Florida. 'When the midterm come, remember this because they just let her go. They basically gave her a slap on the wrist.' Speaker 1 notes: 'There has been an attempt to censure Ilhan Omar to punish her for her Charlie Kirk related remarks and actions, and that attempt has just failed due to four Republicans coming to her rescue.' The vote count: 'yeas are two fourteen and the nays are two thirteen. The motion is adopted. Without objection, the motion reconsider is laid on the table.' The discussion closes with online reaction and calls for comments and subscriptions.