reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
In Fulton County, it was discovered that 17,324 votes had no ballot images, despite the requirement of having an image to create a cast vote record and to tabulate. It is unclear whether the images were deleted, replaced, or if the votes were created without evidence. This discrepancy resulted in an additional 13,000 votes for Biden and 4,000 votes for Trump, giving Biden a net advantage of 9,000 votes. The margin of victory in the county was 11,779 votes.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
The auditor's concerns reveal mismanagement and potential breaches in the Fulton County election, where President Biden won by 12,000 votes. Evidence suggests that unidentified ballots were brought in, creating a breach in custody of 9,000 to 19,000 ballots. Fulton County printed around 20,000 ballots independently, bypassing the contracted printer. The whereabouts and legitimacy of these ballots remain unknown. The auditor also observed unidentified individuals delivering ballots, indicating a reckless election management. There is circumstantial evidence of intent to cause chaos and potential fraud. A contract with a group called Happy Faces, which has intriguing financial ties, raises further suspicions. Their involvement in ballot counting suggests an intention to manipulate the election outcome.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
In Georgia, over 200,000 mail-in ballots were found to have been voted but never marked as returned. About 96,000 of these ballots were never marked as returned but were still voted. This issue was not limited to just a few counties, as it was seen across the board. Additionally, some ballots were shown as voted before they were even received back by the county, which is not supposed to happen. These irregularities raise concerns about the legality of these votes.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
There was meaningful voter fraud in Fulton County, Georgia during the November 2020 election. At least 36 mail-in ballots were double counted, totaling over 4,000 votes. The Atlanta Journal Constitution also found that hundreds of ballots were improperly duplicated. Surveillance footage showed ballots being scanned multiple times, but the county won't answer how many times they were counted. Audit tally sheets were falsified, with fabricated vote totals. A whistleblower noticed that the mail-in ballots had no creases and were filled out by a printer. Over 200 mail-in ballot images were not included in the hand count audit results. Additionally, nearly 35,000 voters who had moved out of their county of residence still voted illegally. It is important to find out the truth and protect democracy.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Linda McLaughlin and her colleagues present a data-focused argument alleging election fraud in Georgia, supported by multiple data analyses and demonstrations. - Linda McLaughlin introduces the data integrity group and states that data is numerical and non-partisan; she aims to remedy a lack of presented data in the discussion. - Dave Labou, a lead data scientist, explains that their analysis across precincts, counties, and the state identified over 40 data points of negative voting or vote switching across candidates totaling over 200,000 votes. Separately, machine learning algorithms used for anomaly detection in fraud detection flagged over 500 precincts with over 1,000,000 corresponding votes showing suspicious activity. He emphasizes that the process is scientific and not tied to political affiliations. - Labou uses a banking analogy to illustrate data integrity concerns: in hypothetical online banking, deposits or withdrawals being redirected or split would indicate fraudulent activity. He applies this concept to voting data, arguing that the voting system data aligns with the Secretary of State data used to certify results, yet exhibits patterns akin to transfers and reallocation not authorized by voters. - He states that the data are publicly available but require advanced programming to extract, parse, and join datasets. Their independent team has made all analysis, programs, and data public to allow replication and has produced videos to translate the analysis for broader understanding. - A key claim is that receiving over 90% in a precinct is a marker for fraud; in Fulton County, more than 150 precincts voted 90% or more for Biden, and in the statewide race (decided by less than 13,000 votes), these 150 Fulton precincts accounted for 152,000 Biden votes, described as a clear indicator of suspicious or fraudulent activity. - Labou and team present a series of visuals and explanations indicating explicit vote count switching, e.g., in Dodge County, where Trump’s votes appear to be subtracted while Biden’s counts increase in tandem with county updates, leading to a shift in totals that would not appear in state totals due to timing of updates. - They reference adjudication as the review of ballots flagged during scanning, noting that only ballots with a contest causing questions about how the computer reads them are adjudicated. - In DeKalb County, they assert it is statistically impossible for nine out of ten voters to vote for Biden in 94 precincts. - They describe a data flow in Fulton County: poll pad check-in, ballot image saved on the machine, SD cards transported to drop-off locations, escorted to a warehouse, run through Democracy Suite, exported to a Dominion server, and inserted into a SQL Server database before transmission to the Secretary of State and data aggregators. - A critical point is the vulnerability within the county update data-entry process: the square box detailing data-entry options in the election software allows updating vote batches, projecting batches, and generating new or temporary batches that can be injected directly into the tally; these options can be validated and published, enabling potential manipulation before server upload. - They pose questions about validation: whether two observers from both parties were present during SD card transmissions and drop-off transmissions, and whether there is a public log of exchanges at drop-off points. They challenge why elected officials have not pursued these questions about voting integrity. - Labou notes the process is machine-to-machine and, by design, should not decrement sums; any decrement requires a robust explanation, and their data suggest negative drops are inconsistent with normal sequential processes. Speaker 2 clarifies the data sources (CITL election night data and Edison/New York Times data) and asserts that the process from poll pads to secretary of state is machine-driven, with no human entry of totals, thereby removing human entry error as an explanation for observed negative changes. Speaker 4 adds emphasis on the validation and potential vulnerabilities in the software options used for election administration, underscoring the need for transparency and inquiry into the electoral process.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
I found that there were approximately 25,000 ballots in Maricopa County that were not printed from the official Dominion PDF ballot. These ballots had imperfections in the lines and circles, unlike the perfect PDF printing. The imperfections were consistent across all the ballots, suggesting they were not genuine. These 25,000 questionable ballots alone exceed Joe Biden's margin of victory by over double.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
In my examination of the photographs, I found that there were approximately 5,000 different ballots produced by the election subcontractor for each zone or district in Maricopa County. These ballots were specific to the issues relevant to each area. However, I discovered that around 25,000 ballots were not printed from the official Dominion PDF ballot. These ballots had imperfections in the lines and breaks in the circles or ovals, which were consistent across all of them. These 25,000 unidentifiable ballots alone represent more than double the margin of Joe Biden's 10,457 vote lead.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Fulton County reported 59,000 votes on Election Day, but the speaker believes the actual number is around 22,000, suggesting 37,000 votes were inserted. Evidence from Carter Jones, a consultant, shows that Fulton County had 21,843 votes with 655 provisionals. Notably, there is a screenshot from November 5th, a day and a half after the election, showing an incompatible number of open and closed polling places. A former employee, Dwight Brower, mentions about 14,000 people casting ballots. The transcript ends with a question about the confirmed vote count of 14,152 at 5 p.m.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
We subpoenaed Fulton County for 518,000 ballot images from the recount, not from election day. There are 380,761 missing ballot images from election day. Fulton County has not provided an explanation for this discrepancy. It is important for every vote to have a corresponding ballot image. Translation: We requested ballot images from Fulton County for the recount, not for election day. There are 380,761 missing ballot images from election day that have not been explained. It is crucial that every vote has a corresponding ballot image.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
There were significant discrepancies found in the election audit, including 255,000 ballots without corresponding records, 23,000 votes from people who no longer lived in the county, and 23,000 double votes. The audit also revealed that voting machines were connected to the Internet, contrary to previous claims. The audit did not confirm Joe Biden's win, but rather highlighted potential fraud. The hand recount matched the original count, but concerns about fraud remain.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
In Georgia, over 96,000 mail-in ballots were voted but never marked as returned. This issue was found across multiple counties, indicating a widespread problem. Additionally, some ballots were voted before being received back. These irregularities suggest potential illegal votes.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
The investigation confirms 380,761 missing ballot images from election day. Fulton County was subpoenaed for recount images, not election day ones. It's unclear why the election day images are missing. Fulton County should ensure every vote has a corresponding ballot image. Translation: The investigation found 380,761 missing ballot images from election day. Fulton County was asked for recount images, not those from election day. The reason for the missing images is unknown. Fulton County should ensure that every vote has a corresponding ballot image.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
The investigation confirms missing ballot images - 380,761 from election day not available. Subpoenaed 518,000 ballot images from Fulton County for recount, not election day. Fulton County does not have images for 380,761 election day ballots. County does not know why. Should every vote have a ballot image?

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Fulton County reported 59,000 votes on Election Day, but the speaker believes the actual number is around 22,000, suggesting 37,000 votes were inserted. Evidence from Carter Jones, a consultant for Fulton County, shows that there were 21,843 votes with 655 provisionals. Notably, there is a screenshot from November 5th, a day and a half after the election, showing an incompatible number of open and closed polling places. During a special meeting on election night, an official record noted an inconsistent number of votes. A former employee of the Elections Division mentioned that around 14,000 people had cast ballots.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
There was meaningful voter fraud in Fulton County, Georgia during the November 2020 election. At least 36 mail-in ballots were double counted, totaling over 4,000 votes. The Atlanta Journal Constitution also found that hundreds of ballots were improperly duplicated. Surveillance footage obtained by Voter GA showed ballots being scanned multiple times. Fulton County failed to provide over 100,000 audit tally sheets, and when they were finally turned over, falsified totals were discovered. A whistleblower noticed that the mail-in ballots had no creases and were filled out by a printer. Additionally, an analysis found that nearly 35,000 voters in Georgia illegally voted in their old county. These irregularities raise serious concerns about the integrity of the election.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
The report claims Georgia’s 2020 election should not have been certified, arguing that election data entered by counties and the Secretary of State was never proved or verified as accurate, and that Georgia counties and the Secretary of State blocked open records requests for paper ballots. The report says Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger’s office, “through Ryan Germany,” instructed counties to refuse requests. It asserts the voting system was intended to provide an auditable paper trail via paper ballots and that state wording about making scanned ballot images available for public ballot counts was copied from Dominion marketing materials. It also claims Georgia counties deleted ballot images and references “a Franken count” in which a hand recount was required because “one million seven hundred thousand ballot images” were deleted. It reports open records request results from all 159 counties, stating 1.7 million missing ballots, and says a voter image tool and “Voter GA” reinforce that 74 counties could not produce original ballot images. It further claims that 48% of counties destroyed ballot images or refused to comply, six admitted having none, 22 admitted to having only recount images, and 28 admitted to partial originals (some mail-in, some in-person) with shortages. It claims Raffensperger counted 300,000 too many votes statewide and cites a Today Show appearance where Raffensperger said 4.7 million votes had been cast with “about two percent left to go.” The report says the video feed cut out as those numbers were being discussed. It also claims that at the time Raffensperger said 4.7 million ballots, 158 of 159 counties had reported, with Fulton County the only one still incomplete, and that official certification later showed roughly 4,998,482 votes (about 5 million). It argues this implies additional votes came in from Fulton County precincts, and raises a question about where “three hundred thousand extra ballots” came from, asserting that the paper ballots cannot be checked without access. The report focuses on Fulton County missing ballot images and authentication files. It claims Fulton County is missing 374,000 ballot images from the November 3 ballot count and 315,000 ballot images from advance voting, confirmed by county attorney Steven Rosenberg. It describes scanning outputs: a TIFF image, a results page attached to the TIFF, and a SHA authentication file meant to prove the image was not altered. It states Fulton County is missing 59,000 election-day ballot images and alleges ballot imaging was not required for the November 2020 election, though it claims Dominion’s contract required ballot images and SHA creation. It further claims Fulton County is missing nearly all SHA files: of 527,000 ballots, it alleges Fulton County provided only 16,000 SHA files to authenticate 527,000 ballots, and that it had 148,000 absentee-by-mail ballot images but far fewer SHA files. It also claims the December 9 final recount still lacked 18,000 ballot images. Next, the report alleges “unsigned tabulator tapes” for 315,000 votes certified by Fulton County. It presents claims that tabulator tapes printed without signatures and witnesses’ sign-offs were used to certify votes affecting 315,000 ballots, including duplicated serial numbers supposedly “impossible.” It references rules requiring tabulator tape verification, printing at least three tapes per scanner, and witness signatures or written reasons for non-signing. The report then alleges problems in Georgia’s “risk-limiting audit” process, calling it a “Franken count.” It cites a Secretary of State document stating that from November 11 to November 19 officials conducted a risk-limiting audit requiring a full manual count. The report quotes Philip Stark describing Georgia’s decision as a “Frankencount,” and it cites Carter Jones, a Fulton County consultant, alleging errors in the audit spreadsheet and claiming duplicates and miscounts. It states the report’s work found duplicate ballot counts and vote totals that resulted in “too many” votes for Biden and too many for Trump within a sample of absentee-by-mail ballots, and it argues that multiple counted batches did not match. The report says it also found recount problems and missing images in Fulton County after a December 9 recount, alleging 17,724 missing ballot images and that 3,125 ballot images were counted twice, while another statewide tool purportedly shows duplication across other counties. It further claims an “election day lie” about turnout in Fulton County. It contrasts the county’s reported 59,143 election-day votes with Carter Jones’s screenshot claiming about 21,843 election-day votes as of a specific timestamp (November 5 12:49 AM) and with meeting testimony from Dwight Brouwer asserting around 14,152 votes cast by about 5 PM, plus 598 provisional ballots. The report claims the math implies tens of thousands of additional votes were added quickly and contrasts that with purportedly low crowding and claims about the absence of long lines. It alleges precinct-level vote count mismatches between the initial count (November 3) and the December 9 recount by comparing ballot images for specific precincts and races, claiming ballots were removed and inserted. It lists examples of precincts where it claims large proportions of ballots differed between counts. The report also alleges that in the statewide recount Georgia still lacked over 500,000 ballot images, arguing this makes the vote count unverifiable without paper ballots. Additional claims include: - Logic and accuracy testing allegedly completed after early voting ended (it states testing should have been completed by October 5 but was completed October 31). - Allegations of ballot trafficking shown in videos and requests to view specific clips. - Claims that ballots can be changed or votes ignored via machine vulnerabilities, including a reference to “unclear ballot” demonstrations and an example of QR code signature mismatch affecting scanner handling (leading to misreads as provisional and missing subsequent ballots). - A quoted audit expert (Philip Stark) asserting the lack of basic accounting controls makes it impossible to determine who really won and that this is not limited to Fulton County. The report ends by asserting Georgia’s 2020 results are “totally unverifiable,” referencing archived official counts for late certification moments, and concludes with calls for Raffensperger and Brian Kemp to step down.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
In Fulton County, it was discovered that 17,324 certified results had no ballot images. It is unclear if the images were deleted, replaced, or if the votes were created without evidence. This discrepancy resulted in an additional 13,000 votes for Biden and 4,000 votes for Trump. The margin of victory was 11,779, so this discrepancy gave Biden a net advantage of 9,000 votes.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
The investigation confirms that there are missing ballot images. Specifically, 380,761 ballot images from the election day machine count are not available. We subpoenaed Fulton County for all ballot images and received about 518,000, but these pertain to the recount, not the election day count. Thus, the missing images are a result of the focus on the recount rather than the original election day data.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
3% of pre-election voting ballots were changed using the HAMR and ScoreCard software programs, potentially causing a significant nationwide shift in the vote. An algorithm was also used to calculate additional votes for Mr. Biden in specific areas, like Michigan, where a computer glitch resulted in a 5,500 vote change in favor of President Trump in one district. Similar issues may have occurred in other states. Hundreds of thousands of ballots mysteriously appeared for Mr. Biden, which defies statistical probability.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
In Georgia, over 200,000 mail-in ballots were found to have been voted without being marked as returned. Around 96,000 of these ballots were never shown as received back by the county. This issue was seen across multiple areas, indicating a widespread problem. Additionally, some ballots were voted before being received back by the county, which is not supposed to happen. These irregularities suggest potential illegal votes being counted.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
There was significant voter fraud in Fulton County, Georgia, during the November election, with over 4,000 mail-in ballots double counted. Voter GA's findings indicate that more than 3,300 votes were counted for Biden and 865 for Trump due to these discrepancies. The Atlanta Journal Constitution corroborated that hundreds of ballots were improperly duplicated. Surveillance footage shows ballots being scanned multiple times, raising questions about how many times votes were counted. An audit revealed falsified tally sheets, with discrepancies in reported vote totals. Additionally, over 200 mail-in ballot images were found that were not included in the hand count. An expert noted that nearly 35,000 voters had moved out of their counties before the election but still voted illegally. These issues highlight serious concerns about election integrity and the need for transparency in the electoral process.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
There was meaningful voter fraud in Fulton County, Georgia during the 2020 election. At least 36 batches of mail-in ballots were double counted, totaling over 4,000 votes. The Atlanta Journal Constitution independently reviewed digital ballot images and found hundreds of improperly duplicated ballots. Surveillance footage obtained by Voter GA showed ballots being scanned multiple times. Fulton County failed to provide over 100,000 audit tally sheets, and when they were finally turned over, falsified sheets were found. A whistleblower noticed that the mail-in ballots had no creases and were filled out by a printer. An elections expert found that nearly 35,000 voters illegally voted in their old county. It is important to find out the truth and ensure the integrity of our elections.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Batch number 11 in Ware County was verified by human counters to go to Trump, but machine records showed it flipped to a Biden batch. The altered batch was then reproduced as fake batch 35. In the second machine count, the numbers were manipulated to maintain the result. Only 80 reconciled net votes for Trump were found in the hand and machine counts, leaving 70 unreconciled net votes.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
Examples of statistical irregularities in election data reveal vote manipulation, particularly in Dodge County. Incremental vote counts for Donald Trump show discrepancies, with some votes appearing to switch or disappear. Notably, over 30,000 of Trump's votes vanished across Dodge, Daughtry, and Putnam counties. A specific instance in Bibb County, Georgia, illustrates this: Trump had 29,391 votes at one point, while Biden had 17,218. Shortly after, Trump's votes dropped to 17,218, and Biden's rose to 29,391, indicating a direct switch. Such manipulations can go unnoticed due to the time lag in state reporting, allowing discrepancies to appear neutral to observers.

Video Saved From X

reSee.it Video Transcript AI Summary
We asked Fulton County for all ballot images, but only received about 518,000 for the recount, not the 380,761 from election day. The focus was on the recount, not the original election. It's unclear why the election day images are missing. Shouldn't every vote have a valid image?
View Full Interactive Feed