reSee.it - Related Video Feed

I am an American citizen with the right to bear arms. I will carry my gun as I please, without needing a permit. I will disregard any law that violates my rights, even if it means going to prison. It is the duty of every American citizen to carry a gun everywhere they go. If you are not carrying a gun or have one within reach, you are wrong.

The speaker believes that everyday citizens carrying guns increases the likelihood of gun deaths. States with comprehensive gun safety reforms have lower gun death rates, and there is a correlation between gun safety and saving lives. California has one of the lowest gun death rates in America, while the highest murder rates tend to be in red states; eight of the top ten murder rates per capita are in red states. California started establishing common sense gun safety laws in the nineties, leading to a significant, nation-leading reduction in the gun death rate since then. The speaker states they are focused on data and evidence, and also mindful and respectful of the Second Amendment.

I am Kyle Rittenhouse, outreach director for Texas gun rights. I will be writing in Ron Paul for president because I believe in unwavering support for the second amendment. If a candidate is not fully committed to this cause, I will not vote for them. We need strong advocates for our rights to prevent erosion. I stand by my decision with no regrets.

Speaker 1 asks Speaker 0 if they still believe the NRA is a terror group. Speaker 0 clarifies that they support the 2nd amendment and do not consider the NRA a terror group. Speaker 1 questions if Speaker 0 regrets tweeting about it in 2018, to which Speaker 0 responds that they don't recall tweeting it but if they did, they don't consider the NRA a terror group. Speaker 1 then asks if Speaker 0 regrets endorsing various politicians, and Speaker 0 clarifies that they don't recall endorsing Bernie Sanders but they do like him, and they voted for Barack Obama without regrets.

The speaker argues that the Second Amendment is a right, not a privilege, but with restrictions that include having an ID and a permit on hand. He notes that current reports claim Alex Pretty did not have either on, implying he was not carrying legally. Beyond legality, the speaker emphasizes a responsibility to carry a firearm with foresight and understanding of the situation, recommending that someone who carries take a training class for their state, and even suggesting taxpayers fund it if possible because it’s a right. Regarding the shooting incident, the speaker states that only one person could have absolutely prevented Alex Pretty from being shot that day: Alex Pretty himself. He asserts he does not think the shooting was necessary to save a life, but he watched the incident from behind Pretty and not as an arresting officer or as the person who might have fired. He questions why Pretty had 10 rounds, arguing that if someone is shot, the shooter should have aimed to kill because they are trying to kill you; he attributes this to police training and the reasonableness doctrine. The speaker references the Supreme Court’s reasonableness doctrine, explaining that a police officer may protect themselves when someone has resisted arrest, disobeyed orders, and shown the means to harm. He concedes Pretty should not have been shot, noting there were ten minutes prior to the event with alternative actions that could have been taken, but he did not see those ten minutes. He describes Pretty as a protester versus an agitator, noting Pretty arrived with a cell phone and stood in the middle of a street during an operation, which the speaker labels as common sense. He asserts that carrying a weapon and entering the middle of a police operation is lawful, but suggests another prevention: a police cordon by the Minneapolis Police Department to prevent people like Pretty from entering the middle of the operation, instead of standing 100 feet away with a sign. The speaker acknowledges potential liability for any federal agent who acted prematurely or shot when they shouldn’t have, but reiterates that Pretty had no business where he was at that moment and did resist arrest. He states that in Minnesota, a carry permit is revoked at the moment of resisting arrest. Finally, the speaker blames politicians for letting the event happen, naming Donald Trump and Tim Walz as figures discussed. He calls for Border Patrol agents to secure the border and for the Minneapolis Police Department to be present to manage crowds. He mentions Jose Huerta Chuma, describing a violent rap sheet including domestic assault, and argues that sympathy for someone who is willing to risk the safety of others should diminish. He emphasizes a desire for no one to get hurt and urges people to use common sense, especially when carrying a weapon.

The speaker emphasizes the importance of gun rights, stating they are a lifetime NRA member and an enhanced carry permit holder. They introduced a bill to prevent federal funds from being used to maintain records of gun purchases, citing a strong stance on Second Amendment rights.

I'm Kyle Rittenhouse, outreach director for Texas gun rights. I'll be writing in Ron Paul for president because Trump's stance on the second amendment isn't strong enough for me. If you're not unwavering on the second amendment, I won't vote for you. We need strong advocates for our rights. I stand by my decision.

I have a 20-gauge shotgun for hunting. You're not allowed to own any weapons, but I'm not taking your gun away. You need 100 rounds, and we’re discussing a veto. There’s misinformation circulating; I never said I would take your gun. That’s a viral video spreading lies. You just claimed I said I would take your AR. Let’s clarify what was actually said.

I will not take away anyone's guns, as I believe in the Second Amendment. The Supreme Court has settled the argument on gun rights, with Antonin Scalia's decision providing an expansive interpretation. However, I understand the heartbreak caused by gun violence, as two members of my family were killed. As president, I will work to reduce gun violence, but I don't think taking away guns is the right solution at this time. It would only polarize the country and be seen as an attack on the Constitution. Instead, I want to focus on stopping school shootings and protecting our children, even if it means implementing measures similar to those used for airline security.

The speaker responds to Mr. Massey by discussing the Second Amendment, stating that it guarantees the right to bear arms in the context of a well-regulated militia. The founding fathers believed militias were necessary for a free state and opposed standing armies as tools of tyranny. They framed the Second Amendment as a safeguard for having a militia.

The speaker believes the focus should be on mental health, not guns, stating that most gun owners are good people. They argue that the issue is a mental health problem disguised as a gun problem. They believe people should be able to defend their homes and property, and that disarming law-abiding citizens won't make the world better, especially considering the vast number of guns in circulation. The speaker questions the logic of giving up guns, stating a desire to stay alive and be capable of defending themselves against bad people. They want to be the one making the decision in a confrontation and to be trained in firearms.

The speaker states that many rights could be gone, including those related to unreasonable search and seizure, the 5th amendment, and the 6th amendment right to an attorney. The speaker mentions the first amendment and the second amendment, stating they are in favor of the second amendment and do not believe anyone's guns should be taken away. The speaker claims someone wants to terminate the Constitution of the United States.

America is the greatest country, and the speaker fights against Democrats' gun control, open borders, the "trans agenda," and reckless government spending. Democrats under Joe Biden gave trillions to illegal aliens, the "green news scam," and "deep state" friends to destroy the country. The speaker is working with Donald Trump to make America great again and protect faith, families, and freedom. In honor of America's 250th anniversary, the speaker is giving away an M249 SAW Para to one American patriot because in America, you can. The speaker will always fight for the right to keep and bear arms. Visit the website to enter and wish America a happy 250th anniversary.

Speaker 0 is asked about winning the union vote despite his stance on gun control. He denies wanting to take away guns and clarifies that he never mentioned it. The conversation gets heated, with Speaker 0 expressing frustration and asking for a moment. The transcript ends with Speaker 0 mentioning that there are many people who support him.

I have experience with firearms from hunting, military service, and trap shooting. Responsible gun ownership should not be defined by extremists. This is about protecting our children and communities, not the second amendment.

Speaker 1 describes shift on gun policy after Sandy Hook: "I sat in that office with those Sandy Hook parents. I've become friends with school shooters. I've seen it." He notes: "The NRA, I was NRA guy for a long time. They used to teach gun safety," and recalls: "I'm of an age where my shotgun was in my car so I could pheasant hunt after football practice. That's not where we live today." He cites Minnesota data: "The number one where the most firearm deaths happen in Minnesota are rural suicides," and argues "we have an epidemic of children getting guns and shooting themselves." He cautions against stigmatizing mental health: "just because you have a mental health issue doesn't mean you're violent." He states: "Sometimes it just is the guns. It's just the guns, and there are things that you can do about it." He calls for a "healthy conversation" that finds "solutions... that work, protect second amendment, protect our children."

I was created in the image of god, and I want to talk about Gavin Newsom's 11% tax on guns and ammo in California. It's a violation of our rights. The law says we can have guns in our trucks, but only if they're in a case. Gavin Newsom is a traitor, and our government is allowing chemical warfare from China and aiding Mexican drug cartels. They're killing Americans and the border patrol does nothing. There's also a lot of child trafficking happening. Governor Greg Abbott, shame on you. We believe in law and order and self-defense.

I woke up 5 weeks ago and my daughter urged me to address gun violence. I returned NRA donations, support common sense gun laws like background checks and CDC research, oppose reciprocal carry, and believe weapons of war should only be used in combat.

I'm Lily Tang Williams, a Chinese immigrant who survived communism. Can you guarantee our government won't become tyrannical? If not, the gun control debate is over because I won't give up my guns. Visit China to see how gun control works for the CCP dictatorship.

The only obstacle to the new world order is the right of Americans to bear arms. Efforts to take away guns are driven by the intent of the Second Amendment, which was not for hunting or protection against burglars. Our forefathers established this amendment so that as long as every American owned a weapon, the government could never oppress us. Bills to take away weapons are constantly introduced in Congress, but they are often defeated. The truth is, in a town where everyone owns a weapon, crime is almost non-existent.

The speaker believes there have been attacks on the Constitution, particularly the First Amendment, with Democrats claiming it enables disinformation. The speaker argues the First Amendment exists because the founders came from countries where free speech was punished. The speaker asserts the Second Amendment is there to stop tyranny and protect freedom of speech. They have debated this, especially with people in LA who want to take away guns. The speaker asks if anyone can guarantee the U.S. will never have a tyrannical government, and since no one can, people need to keep their guns to prevent it.

My name is Mark Robinson. I stand for law-abiding citizens' rights to bear arms. Blaming us for shootings won't solve the problem. Criminals won't give up their guns, leaving us defenseless. I will fight for our constitutional rights at city council. The Second Amendment applies to all, and we demand to keep our rights. Let's unite and dispel myths dividing us. We are the majority, and we will stand our ground.

I have a shotgun and a 20 gauge for hunting, but I'm not taking away anyone's guns. The viral video claiming otherwise is a lie. I did not say I would take your AR.

"I'm a constitutionalist." "All I care about is my constitutionally protected rights and the future of my children." "we don't have a gun problem here in this nation. We have a problem with mental health and we have a problem with evil." "It doesn't matter if evil utilizes our gun, a car, a baseball bat, a machete, or a rock." "It's an operation to circumvent your constitutionally protected rights." "America, if you give up your guns, you're not gonna have any rights." "You need to stand up and you need to tell these corrupt career politicians to get fucked."

The 2nd amendment is not just for duck hunting. It's about our rights to protect ourselves from others.