reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speakers discuss financial incentives for abortion services and procedures. They mention removing body parts intact for organ harvesting. The conversation includes details on dismembering fetuses and ensuring intact organs for research purposes. The speakers also discuss the process of extracting body parts during abortions.

The clients of these underground operations are extremely wealthy, arriving in private jets and helicopters. They pay a hefty sum to spend time with a child, knowing that the child will not survive. If the child becomes disabled, no one will care for them, so they are immediately turned into organ donors. These operations are highly secretive and well-organized, resembling corporations. There is a medical team on standby, responsible for organizing the transplants and finding clients for the organs. The demand for organs is immense, ensuring that these operations continue.

Tissue procurement involves dissection to obtain requested tissues from intact fetuses. The status of the fetus, including heartbeat, can vary. Some hearts may beat independently even if not part of an intact body. Discussions reveal challenges in obtaining tissues, with some competitors opting to isolate and sell vials instead of providing whole specimens. In Nigeria, a man confessed to luring and killing individuals for their body parts, revealing a syndicate involved in human trafficking. Meanwhile, Kenya is developing a legal organ donation program to address the shortage of kidney donors. The Kenya Tissue and Transplant Authority is drafting regulations to facilitate organ harvesting from deceased patients, aiming to ensure ethical practices and equitable allocation of organs. The initiative seeks to educate the public on the importance of organ donation to save lives.

Companies pay large sums for women's placentas, used in pharmaceuticals, beauty products, and medical procedures. Placentas from c-sections are more valuable due to less contamination, leading to higher prices. This may incentivize more c-sections, raising concerns about coercion.

A medical director for an entire affiliate and someone over abortion services discuss fetal tissue procurement. They are looking for livers and cardiac tissue, not footprints. Dilation makes it easier to get bigger pieces out before potential relation returns. If the fetus is coming out to the umbilicus and the torso area is intact, that's ideal because that's where all the organs are. Disarticulation counts, and then the rest can be brought through all in one piece. The discussion touches on the use of "ditch" procedures, which nuke the stem cells. Even in procedures where they're not doing anything close to intact, it's easy to identify and isolate relatively intact abdominal context, though the diamonds are trickier. They are considering getting someone who can do deep sedation protocol. The medical director needed to meet with legal counsel to clarify where exactly this is.

Because the liver could get too sick to the point so you can have up to ninety percent of the liver damaged, and it will grow back. You know, when you do a live liver transplant, let's say you need a live liver transplant, I offer to be a live donor, we'll take a third of my liver out, we'll put that little third into you, and that will grow to a fully double loved organ, usually within six months, could be shorter. And with as soon as up to thirty days, mine will have grown back. So no organ does that. You can't do that with the heart or with the stomach or this lining or anything else, but the liver does do that.

Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton discussed newly obtained documents from the Obama-era FDA that purportedly show the Food and Drug Administration purchased fetal body parts from a fetal-tissue provider. The key items cited include purchases of “intact calvarium baby skulls, eighteen to twenty four weeks” for $515 per skull. Fitton told One America’s John Hines that taxpayers’ money was used “to purchase, basically, the dead bodies of unborn human beings,” noting that the bodies were divided up, with heads, livers, and other parts sold. During the interview, it was highlighted that government records indicate the federal government demanded that purchased fetal organs be “fresh, never frozen,” with documents stating they were to be shipped on dry ice. Fitton described this as horrifying and insisted that these were organs, not just cells, and included skulls up to twenty-four weeks gestation. He asserted there was no doubt these were human beings and claimed organs were being sold, chopped up, and sold. Fitton referenced additional documents from a separate lawsuit filed on behalf of the Center for Medical Progress, pointing to a large operation at the University of Pittsburgh funded with tax dollars and involving Fauci’s agency. He suggested Fauci’s agency should be asked about involvement in both the NIH and NIAID, as well as about alleged support for gain-of-function research and dismemberment of fetal organs, describing it as a “fetal organ chop shop.” The interview noted that a Freedom of Information Act request had been filed with the FDA to uncover whether the agency was buying or selling body parts, and that officials did not initially respond. A judge granted discovery, allowing redactions to be removed, and the released information allegedly showed the FDA was purchasing fetal tissue, including human heads, for $515 per skull. Fitton recalled that the government had sought to withhold price details, but the court ruled against this secrecy. Fitton also mentioned a separate case involving NIH and NIAID, highlighting an alleged “one stop shop operation” at the University of Pittsburgh, and raising questions about whether aborted fetuses were still alive when organs were taken. He claimed the Obama administration was involved, the Trump administration halted the activity, and the Biden administration was reportedly preparing to resume funding of similar activities. When asked what a new learner should think, Fitton described the documents as among the worst he has seen in his twenty-three years of work and called for a thorough investigation into how this was done, why it occurred, whether it violated the law, and how to stop it. He concluded by thanking John Hines for the interview.

Doron from Israel plans to take embryos from a US clinic to India. A woman discusses her experience with egg donation, mentioning the control over her reproductive process. After having her baby, she notes the high costs of surrogacy, which can range from $10,000 to $60,000. The commercialization of surrogacy leads to competition among clinics, often resulting in multiple embryos being implanted to ensure success. This raises ethical concerns, as some fetuses may not go home with the intended parents. An agent claims she can provide a baby quickly, revealing that extra newborns are available for purchase, highlighting the dark side of commodified reproduction. This unregulated industry, projected to grow globally, raises fears of human trafficking and exploitation in the future.

During a clinic day, they discussed what specific body parts people wanted. Some wanted intact parts, like livers and muscles. They mentioned the importance of having a good relationship with the supplier to have these conversations. They also talked about a training method where they would start with research cases and gradually allow others to do more. They emphasized the need to prioritize these requests.

The clients at these high-security brothels are extremely wealthy, arriving in private jets and helicopters. They pay a fortune to spend time with children who are not expected to survive or may become permanently disabled. These brothels, which operate worldwide, have their own medical teams and operating rooms. The organization is highly professional, resembling a complex corporation. There are individuals responsible for caring for the children, organizing organ transplants, and finding organs for clients. The demand for organs is substantial, ensuring the continuation of these operations.

The transcript depicts an undercover-style interview with individuals involved in a global child trafficking and organ harvesting operation. The speakers discuss how the network operates, the profits, and the brutal methods used to procure children and organs, often exploiting vulnerable mothers. Key points: - Donor kit and adoption timing: The trafficker (Speaker 1) explains the cost structure and process, saying he “gets €15,000 for abroad with a kid” and that delivering a child takes about two weeks if there are no special requests for gender. The plan requires several meetings, a party, and testing of the girl, with multiple people involved to ensure the girl’s compliance. - Recruitment and manipulation: The group uses persuasion and “positive thinking” techniques, aiming to see the girl’s reaction and exploiting mothers who are vulnerable or indebted. If a girl has a child, she is pressured or reassured before being persuaded to hand the child over. - Transfer options and appetite for either a child or organs: Depending on demand, the organization may pull a child from a brothel to satisfy clients seeking a child or spare parts. They advertise themselves as a sponsor or businessman abroad, receiving many replies from girls who think they are applying for companionship or work. - Targeted profiles and grooming: An “ideal” girl is described as selfish and easily pliable, with tactics including bribing experiences (a trip to Mazari), monitoring reactions to a child’s calls, and testing loyalty in ways that reveal vulnerability to manipulation. - After acquisition: If a girl agrees, discussions cover the child’s fate, with the implication that the child may be taken away and replaced with forged documents later. There is mention of marriages to Arab men and Muslim legal processes to adopt the child and move it abroad, often with easy, illegitimate name changes that erase traces. - Documentation and traceability: The process often involves swapping papers or creating new identities for the child in Poland or abroad, so that traceability is lost. This includes using new papers for Ukrainian-made children, or other methods to render the child effectively invisible to authorities. - Kidnapping and urgent transplants: Kidnapping is described as rare but possible in emergencies when a transplant is urgently needed. The organization uses coordinated efforts to manage the client’s access while avoiding exposure. - Violent and dehumanizing practices: The dialogue describes infants being tortured and dismembered for organs in a sterile room at a villa, with phrases indicating that infants “suffer” and are used as “spare parts.” Older children are drugged and exploited over time; infants are deemed “useless” for long-term exploitation. - Global network and sophistication: The brokers, medical teams, and logistics are likened to a corporation, with branches worldwide, high-security operations, and organized procurement of both children and organs. The demand is described as immense and ongoing. - Emotional detachment: One speaker notes the mother’s collapse into depression and a desire to kill herself and the baby; another reflects a chilling detachment about the mother’s suffering and the ultimate objective of profit. The dialogue reveals a highly organized, international criminal market for exploiting women and children, with both adoption fraud and organ trafficking tightly interwoven, including identity manipulation, forced payments, and extreme violence.

Big money is being made from the sale of fetal body parts, which even disturbs pro-choice advocates. The medical director for the national office discusses the demand for specific body parts, such as livers and lower extremities, and the pricing range for these specimens. Techniques are discussed to ensure intact organs are obtained, and the importance of communication between the person performing the procedures and the end goal is emphasized. The possibility of partnering with EPFA to streamline the process is mentioned, although it is currently deemed too sensitive. The conversation concludes with gratitude for the helpfulness of a certain individual in fetal tissue collection.

The system is run through China, Israel, Ukraine, and the US now. It’s like harvesting organs and discarding the rest; a soylent green analogy. There are videos in Ukraine about 'Chorny Transplantologia'—the black transplantologist—and they're underground harvesting areas. A wounded Ukrainian soldier: not dead yet; two kidneys, two lungs, a heart, a liver; rest goes to food supply. This part I can't prove, but I can prove about the kidneys. The person is worth almost a million; you selling it could fetch over a million. If you sell your own kidney, you might get 10x markup. It involves big hospitals in China and live harvesting of Uighurs, Christians, Falun Gong.

The clients of this organization are wealthy individuals who arrive in private jets and helicopters. They pay a large sum to spend time with a child, knowing that the child will not survive or may become disabled. In such cases, the child's organs are immediately harvested. This organization has branches worldwide, with highly secure operating rooms. It operates like a complex corporation, with a medical team on standby and individuals responsible for finding organs for clients. The demand for organs is high, and the organization continues to meet this demand.

Natalie, the lead technician for BioMax, has been discussing tissue collection with Misty. There are two providers who book up to 24 weeks. Anne is one of these providers. There is another provider who can also send samples through up to 24 weeks. Formula was put in a sample, making it dark white instead of clear.

Some people try to change the presentation, but you never have enough dilation to deliver an intact calvarium unless you have a huge amount of dilation. With breech presentation, dilation happens as the case goes on, and often in the last step, you can evacuate an intact skull. With ultrasound guidance, they can change the presentation. When asked if there has ever been a case where the presentation had to be changed to get intact fetal tissue, the speaker said no. The speaker confirmed that when they said "we've been pretty successful with that," they were referring to Planned Parenthood Los Angeles (PPLA) and including themselves.

The transcript centers on a documentary-like investigation into child trafficking, including the sale of babies for organs and for prostitution, and the operational mechanics of trafficking rings in Europe. - The conversation opens with a debate about the worst fate for a child, with pedophilia deemed the “worst option,” but there is a tension about judging a parent who might sell their child. The speakers acknowledge they want to remove a problem and question the significance of the child’s fate. - A narrator explains encountering a girl willing to sell her child to a brothel or as an organ donor, and aims to save her while documenting the process. The girl was relocated from a criminal environment to a different town, but remained controlled by an agent who wanted to sell her child. The sale is described as foiled by the COVID-19 pandemic and border restrictions. - When the pregnancy is discovered, the pregnant young woman seeks a solution and believes she cannot keep the child, framing it as the best possible decision under the circumstances. The trafficking network involves a well-known criminal underworld contact who is told there is a child for sale and who can help. - The interview reveals that in Germany, small children are sometimes held with a family until age three or four and then sent to a brothel. The sale of a newborn can be arranged so the mother signs the child trafficker in as the father, who then takes the baby abroad, making it hard for authorities to trace the child as “officially somewhere in Europe with its father.” - Emotional attachment to the baby is discussed; one participant reports no emotional attachment, focusing on practicality. The fear of life being over with a child is framed as slavery, constant care, and sleepless nights, highlighting the practical burdens rather than affection. - On profitability, the mother emphasizes selling a child for organs yields high returns, whereas selling for a brothel is considered in terms of possible cash, with initial offers around 50,000 to 150,000, sometimes 80,000 euros, though later deemed possibly a scam using Polish zloty. - The liver is cited as a high-demand organ, valued around 70,000 euros, with the heart valued similarly, and other organs like the retina also in demand. The ads and market dynamics are discussed, including portals like “Sperm donors, let's make babies,” where ads from women wanting to give away or sell their children appear; a mother posts an ad for money, receiving responses from families and recognizing banners that target young girls. - The interview reveals a chilling willingness to commodify the child; the mother states she cares about her own child above the others and expresses disbelief in divine punishment for such acts. She gives the baby the name Marcelina, while another participant has not named the unborn child. - The trafficking network’s operation is described in detail: a broker coordinates with a German or Dutch ring, with multiple brothels and a system of drugs to control child victims. A child is described as moving through stages—from adoption into a family, to a brothel around age four, to a larger network, with frequent sexual abuse but regulated intervals of activity to avoid overdose. The children are kept largely indoors within brothels, sometimes allowed limited outdoor access under supervision, and often suffer severe social and psychological consequences. - A separate account details the recruitment and identification of pregnant victims, the length of stay in brothels, and the eventual fate of children who do not adapt to mainstream life, highlighting how the organized rings operate with surgical precision and a global scope.

A whistleblower from Stem Express revealed that a liver from a 5-month-old aborted baby was sold for $17,000 to a taxpayer-funded lab. Planned Parenthood claims that 75% of abortions are due to financial issues, suggesting that this amount could have covered someone's rent for a year. This situation highlights a troubling reality where the financial transactions surrounding abortion may prioritize profit over the value of life.

The human liver can grow back up to 70% of its size in just a few weeks. That means that even if a pretty significant portion of your liver is lost, it can literally regenerate and become goddamn near as good as new. Unfortunately, your liver is the only part of the body that has that kind of superpowers, so don't go trying it on your finger. That also means that it's the only organ in the body that you can donate half of to somebody else, and both halves will literally grow back into their own functioning livers. After all, it's literally the only thing that will stop it from magically healing itself. So don't destroy your liver just in case you need it to regenerate later or you wanna donate part of it to someone else. Stay healthy, my friends. You're welcome.

Natalie, the lead technician at BioMax, and Misty are discussing tissue collection with a middleman. They mention two providers who can book up to 24 weeks, one being Anne. They talk about the formula being unclear in a product.

Some companies collect women's placentas for use in pharmaceuticals, beauty products, and medical procedures, with reported values ranging from $50,000 to $500,000. The value is reportedly higher for placentas from C-sections, as they are considered less contaminated than those delivered vaginally. This raises concerns about whether financial incentives are influencing the rising rates of C-sections among women.

Judicial Watch reports obtaining records from the Obama administration and FDA revealing the FDA purchased "intact calvarium baby skulls, eighteen to twenty-four weeks" for $515 per skull. The fetal organs purchased by the government were required to be "fresh, never frozen" and shipped on dry ice. According to Judicial Watch, the documents raise questions about whether the aborted human beings were still alive when the organs were taken from them. The Trump administration shut down the practice, but the Biden administration is reportedly preparing to fund it again. Judicial Watch also uncovered documents in another lawsuit showing a massive operation at the University of Pittsburgh, funded with tax dollars, involving Fauci's agency. They allege it was a "fetal organ chop shop." The organization sought details on the buying/selling of fetal body parts via a Freedom of Information request. The president of Judicial Watch stated these are the worst documents about government conduct he has ever seen.

Big money is being made from the sale of fetal body parts. Even pro-choice advocates are disturbed. People want liver and lower extremities. The price is $30 to $100 per specimen. Providers try to change the presentation so it's not vertex. If starting from a breech presentation, dilation happens as the case goes out. There are steps to change the COVID presentation. If enough dilation is maintained, the person doing the procedures understands what is needed. Knowing what is needed makes a huge difference. One person had 8 cases and knew which were more likely to yield what was needed, making decisions accordingly. Conversations are happening behind closed doors with affiliates.

Emily and a technician from Biomax discuss tissue collection. The technician mentions meeting the director and having a lot of tissues available. They have two providers who go up to 24 weeks, including Anne. The technician recalls a past experience in Brisbane with a 16-year-old patient where they had to hurry, resulting in less intact tissue. Other days, the tissue is more intact, with possibly only an arm detached. Tissue collection typically occurs Thursday, Friday, and Saturday. The technician also mentions an instance where formula was put in a glass mirror, making it difficult to see.

We perform dissections to obtain tissues requested by researchers. I'm not in the room when the fetus is eliminated from the mother, and I'm not qualified to testify about its medical or biological condition at that time. When I say the tissues are "not alive," I mean they are not moving. Whether or not they have a heartbeat depends. I have seen hearts, not within an intact POC, that are beating independently.