TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

I was contacted by a reporter from the LA Times, Lawrence Darmiento, who questioned me about accusations of deceptive editing in my videos. He included in his article that I had previously settled a lawsuit for $100,000. I find it ironic that the LA Times themselves had to settle a pay disparity lawsuit for $3,000,000, but in their reporting, they made sure to note they admitted no wrongdoing. I also admitted no wrongdoing in my settlement. Additionally, the reporter failed to mention the numerous legal victories I've had, including cases where judges ruled that my videos were not deceptively edited. Even the New York Times has stated that my videos, while edited, did not take words out of context. I am calling on the LA Times to update their article to include these facts.

Shills are attacking me, including Corey Feldman. I used to defend him, but now he's fake news protecting pedophiles like Steven Spielberg. He's a fraud who scammed people with false promises. He asked for $10,000,000 to expose pedophiles, but all it takes is a smartphone and internet access. If he's protecting them, why aren't they paying him better? Everything Corey said is now in doubt, so we must reevaluate his past statements.

As a Christian attorney, I took my responsibilities seriously and aimed to be morally and ethically upright. I believed in challenging the 2020 election results for President Trump, but I failed to ensure the facts presented by other lawyers were accurate. I regret not doing my due diligence in raising challenges in multiple states, including Georgia. If I had known then what I know now, I would not have represented Donald Trump in these post-election disputes. I apologize to the people and have already faced censure from the Colorado Bar. Thank you.

I have been accused, and it's been a paid campaign, of being a federal agent because I was at January 6 and did not get charged. However, despite being at January 6 and not trespassing, which is the crime that everybody was charged with, despite not being charged, not having committed a crime, I only had my bank account frozen for six months, I only was placed on the federal no fly list for a year, and I was only subpoenaed by Congress. I testified under oath when I was deposed as part of the subpoena last year, or I think that was rather in 2022, that I did not ever have contact with federal law enforcement at any time during or after any of the election riots or protests. This was a narrative that was cooked up. Nobody was saying this in 2021 or 2022 because all of my legal problems were publicized. I was on the no fly list, I had my money taken, I was banned from everything. It was only after Joe Kent was defeated in 2022 in the midterms that Max Blumenthal, Joe Kent's best friend, wrote a three part hit piece about me with his wife, Anya Parampol, accusing me of being a fed. They paid people, someone paid people, on Influencible to spread this article and the narrative that I'm a Fed. The claim grew that I gave a speech outside the Capitol and I said, we're taking the Capitol back, keep moving. They say I incited people to go in the building. The report says that none of their confidential sources on the ground were encouraging people to go in the building. There were undercover operatives or informants tasked to do that, but there were no undercover agents and out of 26 informants none of them were doing that. If the claim was I was entrapping people, that wasn't happening. The report also says that all the confidential sources were known to law enforcement before and were interviewed afterward. If I were one of the confidential sources, why would they make the mistake of freezing my money and putting me on the no fly list? The New York Times said they did charge me. I testified under oath that I never talked to law enforcement under penalty of perjury. So if anything, they’ve been saying Trump is gonna get in and blow the whistle. I wish he would on January 6 because if anything comes out, they could arrest me for perjury. I spent hundreds of thousands of dollars defending myself from the feds; lawyers aren’t cheap. My lawyers, not cheap. I probably spent over 200,000, close to 250,000 in legal fees. All the money that I was given by the mysterious French donor, nearly all of it after it was unfrozen, I wound up spending on legal fees. I had to borrow money from people because my bank account was frozen for six months. I missed weddings of my best friends, funerals of my best friends because I was on the federal no fly list. I haven’t had banking services for four years. I haven’t been able to process a credit card for my business. I’ve been banned from everything—Facebook, Instagram; Twitter until May, not even a year ago. For years I spent defending myself from attacks as a racist and a Nazi and a Holocaust denier, then the tactic switched to accusing me of law enforcement, then gay, pedophile, the usual. The grand irony is that Tucker Carlson, a close friend of Max Blumenthal, collaborated on the piece; Tucker Carlson’s father is a federal agent, and during January 6 Tucker Carlson was not talking about election fraud and said he hated Trump. I’m pulling the veil back a little bit, because this is politics. The election was stolen, and there are these dynamics with Blumenthal, Kent, Tucker, and Max Blumenthal’s wife’s article in The Grey Zone.

I don't understand why left-leaning media, which some say is predominantly Jewish, labels people as white supremacists. According to my Jewish friends, this perspective exists. But why is there a perceived animosity towards white individuals? It seems to stem from what some call "woke" culture and virtue signaling.

I posted a picture with Mr. Grosskreutz on Facebook, but the caption about him regretting not killing someone was not true. I made the post due to threats I received online and to defend my friend. I apologize for the false statement.

I was told that to run for committee again, I need to provide a written apology and undergo mandatory training on online conduct. However, I’m unsure what I should apologize for, as I believe I’ve only stated biological facts. It seems I’ve been suspended for bringing LSR into disrepute, but I don’t understand how. The term "transphobia" has become so broad that it now includes simply stating that sex is immutable. I feel empathy for those with gender dysphoria and would never harass them. However, I will not apologize, as I don’t know what I would be apologizing for, and I find it difficult to even begin writing that letter.

In my previous life, I was an insider and I understand what it means to be part of that group. However, I am now facing consequences for leaving that exclusive club and exposing the troubling issues affecting our nation. I believe that I am the only one capable of rectifying these problems. My actions are driven by a desire to serve the people and the movement. Together, we will reclaim our country and restore its greatness.

I'm sorry for getting emotional, but I truly believe my show had value and that it mattered. Thank you to everyone. I felt a sense of guilt for going so hard on issues like Black Lives Matter, anti-Asian hate, defending immigrants, calling out subversive actions against the Constitution, defending inconvenient books like the 1619 Project, and speaking out about the bombing of babies in Gaza. But ultimately, I'm not sorry. I'm not sorry that I stood up for these things because they align with what I believe is right. As a church girl, I was taught that these values are of God, and I'm proud of my show for standing up for them.

I recently returned from Israel and faced backlash for comments taken out of context on my show. I clarified that I don't support Nazi beliefs and prefer focusing on facts. I criticize Israel for apologizing and explain my support for embracing Christianity and Trump. I advocate for unity against radical Islam's persecution of Christians and Jews. Visit rebelisrael.com for more videos.

I would openly say that you have no intent or have never thought about killing yourself, and you do not and have not ever engaged. But but the second part is even more important diligent because this is something I know for a fact that is used to demonize people that are dancing too close to the sun. You need to state publicly, you have not, never have or have no interest in any type of questionable sexual material. I'm telling you, like, there there's there's a degree of pressure that can be applied to people that will not stand down that most people just don't understand.

I falsely accused others of rape, which was wrong. I betrayed the trust of many who believed in me and created a false story for validation from people instead of seeking it from God. I acknowledge my wrongdoing and hope for forgiveness.

I'm a political figure aiming to organize a massive movement to take over the country, which involves associations that aren't always good. If people have a problem with that, they should try building something themselves. Movements shouldn't be destroyed by bad faith attacks over sexual impropriety, especially when it's just flirting. It's gross if someone flirts with 15-year-olds because it's gay and goes against age norms. While meditating, I thought about how Jesus faced mockery, ridicule, humiliation, and false allegations. Like Jesus before Pontius Pilate, all you can be is obedient and resolved. You can't beat the synagogue of Satan with lies.

A community I care about is hurting because of offensive posts attributed to me. Many of you have seen these blog posts online and on social media. They are homophobic, discriminatory, hateful, and weird. When a friend showed them to me in December, I was stunned because I couldn't imagine where they came from. I've spent months trying to understand these posts and hired cybersecurity experts to investigate if someone manipulated my words or my former blog. They haven't been able to prove manipulation, but I genuinely don't believe I wrote those hateful things because they are completely alien to me. I understand why some people don't believe me based on my past tweets and writings. I've been dumb, cruel, and hurtful to the people I advocate for. I own that, and I'm truly sorry.

In September, media outlets globally labeled me a sex criminal, omitting accusers' names. This was the culmination of a years-long campaign to silence my dissenting views on geopolitical issues, particularly regarding the war in Ukraine. My critiques, initially dismissed as Chinese propaganda, were the target of governments and intelligence agencies. Coda Story, linked to the UK government and CIA, played a key role. My reporting, which included concerns about Moderna's profits and the handling of the pandemic, led to de-platforming and demonetization. This censorship, orchestrated by my own government, revealed the sham of open discourse in the West. The attack on me demonstrates the vulnerability of even high-profile individuals to these powerful forces. The response confirms the threat I pose, a threat to those in power. The battle continues, and I choose to remain steadfast.

I was told that to run for committee again, I need to provide a written apology and undergo mandatory training on online conduct. However, I'm unclear about what I should apologize for, as my suspension is based on bringing LSR into disrepute. It feels like a thoughtcrime for simply stating biological facts. I don’t harbor anger or hatred towards those with gender dysphoria, but the term transphobia has become so broad that it includes expressing biological truths. I wouldn't agree to apologize to return to the radio, as I don't know what I would be apologizing for, making it difficult to even start writing that letter.

I was canceled for speaking out about figures like Michael Jackson and R. Kelly, but it's not about race; it's about truth. In 2024, many will face exposure for their actions, regardless of who they are. The truth will come to light, and those who react negatively know why. I've spent 30 years gathering knowledge and secrets, and I know things I shouldn't. I’m not the villain here; I’ve raised my children well and lived a clean life. The industry claims I was blackballed for not showing up, but that's not true. My work speaks for itself.

I've got updates on a second story by Jeffrey Tishauer from the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) about Tom Homan and me. This guy claims to be an investigative reporter, but he's really an Antifa activist. The SPLC is like the National Enquirer of the left, and it's an oxymoron for them to talk about truth. Jeffy's doing another hit piece, trying to tie in DEI and my employer with unrelated stuff. He's mad because I called him out. I work with various groups, even helped open an African American-led GOP office. Plus, this "Nazi hunter" is targeting normal people and groups like Moms for Liberty. Tishauer is lying. I didn't meet Tom Homan at Trump's inauguration. He's also twisting my words about confronting Venezuelan gang members. He is lying about my views regarding January 6th, too. This whole thing is ridiculous.

I want to address the lawsuit that has been brought to my attention. I want to make it clear that it did not happen. I don't remember ever meeting this person, and I would never harm anyone. This is not who I am. The credibility of the person filing the lawsuit is questionable, as they have filed many lawsuits and written a book on how to win them. I have been in public life for almost 40 years, and people know my character. I would never do anything to harm someone. Right now, we need to stay focused and let go of distractions.

"The American Jewish Committee called in a statement Charlie Kirk an anti Semite and quote dangerous. 'Charlie Kirk, an anti Semite.' 'Yeah. He was not an anti Semite. He was the opposite, and he was not dangerous.' He was 'a great lover of people and a purveyor of peace,' 'the opposite,' and he was 'very stung by that.' 'Charlie was deeply offended by that' and expressed some of those feelings on Megyn Kelly show and in other places, but that did not let up. The story is told because he called me and then came to see me at my house about this topic. And I said to him every single time, 'look, I've got my own way to communicate my views.' This is actually not the most important issue to me. There are lots of things I can talk about. I don't need to come to Turning Point. I can take a year off no problem. I hated seeing how much he was suffering, the hassle he was getting from people, and I was attacked too. By the way, it was a huge effort. I wasn't fully aware of it actually because I don't go online."

I'm sorry for getting emotional, but my show had value. In the end, thank you. I felt guilty for going hard on issues like Black Lives Matter, the targeting of Asian Americans, defending immigrants, calling out subversive actions against our liberty, defending inconvenient books like the 1619 Project, and speaking out about the bombing of babies in Gaza. But I'm not sorry. I'm not sorry that I stood up for those things because those things are of God. I was taught those values in church, and I'm proud of my show.

Hey guys, I'm Ben Brody. I want to address false accusations against me. I'm not a member of the Patriotic Front, and those who claim I am are mistaking me for someone else. I've never been to Oregon City for any protest. Lately, I've been busy graduating from UC Riverside on June 21. I've been hanging out with friends in Riverside. These accusations are crazy and incorrect. My family and I are being harassed, but I'm willing to clear up any confusion. It's ridiculous and hard to believe this is happening to me. Thanks, guys.

I'm sorry for getting emotional, but my show had value, and in the end, it mattered. Thank you. I felt guilty for going hard on so many issues, but where I land is that I'm not sorry. Whether it was Black Lives Matter, the targeting of Asian Americans, defending immigrants, discussing the President's actions against the Constitution, defending inconvenient books like the 1619 Project, or talking about Gaza and our right to object to the bombing of babies, I stood up for these things because they are of God. As a church girl, I was taught these things were of God, so I'm not sorry. I'm proud of my show.

The speaker asserts that the Trump administration was “the best administration I’ve ever seen,” noting it’s ten years after the Trump movement and Brexit, and that their side is in power. They express willingness for a long political run, saying they’d be happy if JD Vance could be president for eight years and Marco Rubio for another eight, with continued involvement. They remark that after Trump, the drumbeat of opposition began quickly, accusing him of starting World War III or being controlled, and they stress that those in government have different responsibilities from those in opposition. They ask how JD Vance can win the next election if the group outside has spent four years tearing each other apart. The speaker then addresses being Jewish within the NatCon movement. They state they’ve never done this before and are not particularly comfortable with it. They reflect that it was easy and great to be a leader in the nationalist movement and Jewish until about a year and a half ago, because whenever left-leaning Jews or others accused their speakers of antisemitism, the speaker could defend them, arguing people hadn’t spoken to the person, hadn’t read full statements, and were taking a sentence out of context. They found it fun and rewarding to defend against what they viewed as false, ridiculous antisemitism accusations, and it made them popular. Now, they say, it’s not that easy anymore. They acknowledge that criticism of Israel is fine as a policy discussion, but they’ve been struck by the “depth of the slander of Jews as a people” online over the last year and a half, and say they didn’t expect this on the right. They observe a transition among some on the right—people they once admired and still admire in part—who now believe that praising the Muslim Brotherhood, Islam, and the Quran is appropriate, and that Jews are a big problem. They express hope this will pass and call for reconsidering the relationship between Jews and Christians, proposing a mutual discussion and honor if possible, rather than a vile stream of accusations about Jews’ actions toward Christians in the Middle Ages. Finally, they stress that the coalition was built by Donald Trump and is broad enough to win the next election and future ones. They warn that driving coalition members out, dishonoring them, or keeping them dishonored will lead to loss: it would destroy Vance’s prospects, Rubio’s prospects, and America’s prospects. The speaker presents a choice: preserve the coalition or risk undermining it.