TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Mike Nellis, Lauren Rishon's business partner, allegedly refused to comply with a subpoena, similar to Steve Bannon and Peter Navarro, who faced jail time. Nellis is associated with Authentic Campaigns, which launched a $10,000,000 anti-Trump ad campaign. The speaker questions if this campaign is funded by the millions of dollars in payments allegedly sent to Rishon and Nellis' homes, and if this is why they were allegedly attacked. The speaker suggests this could be an excuse for Nellis not complying with the subpoena. They criticize the Republicans for not enforcing the subpoena against Nellis, while Bannon and Navarro were jailed. The speaker claims Republicans are useless.

I walked out of prison after being targeted by Biden's administration. Warned that they can come for anyone, not just me. The government's control threatens us all. Refusing to betray Trump led to my imprisonment. Democrats are indoctrinating kids and destroying industries. Trump's America was safer and more prosperous. I went to prison so you won't have to. Vote Trump Vance, 2024. Hold the law fair jackals accountable. Love my fiancée who stood by me. Let's win.

Hey, this is James O'Keefe outside the Phil Bredesen campaign. I'm here with Will Stewart, who we caught on video calling Bredesen a liar regarding Kavanaugh's vote. I asked why Bredesen would need to lie to get elected, but Stewart refused to comment, saying he couldn't talk about it. I pressed him for a response, but he insisted he had to leave. He mentioned that the messaging about a "blue wave" should stay behind closed doors. I noted his reluctance to speak and now I'm heading to the debate to see if Bredesen will comment. Stay tuned.

Questioning whether the speaker was kicked out of CPAC, the exchange goes: "And you were kicked out of CPAC. Right?" The reply: "I wasn't kicked out. Or you were disinvited? What what let's there was some kind of drama on Twitter." The other party says: "Don't think so. Tell me everything. There's no drama." The speaker then clarifies: "I, you know, like I said, I came out here I came out here to CPAC last year, had a great time. You know, met my hero, Ben Shapiro. I met my mentor and friend, Casa Dillon. And and so I just came out again this year."

Speaker 1 mentions waiting for Bonnie Willis to respond. They discuss a whistleblower in her office who raised concerns about misuse of funds. Willis fired the whistleblower, prompting a subpoena for related documents. Willis made US Marshals serve the subpoena. They joke about Willis' behavior and mention CPAC. They express appreciation for CPAC's support of conservative principles. Translation: The speakers discuss Bonnie Willis not responding, a whistleblower's concerns, a subpoena for documents, and Willis' behavior. They joke about CPAC and express gratitude for its support of conservative principles.

The speaker states that MAGA supporters are angered by their video and are trying to "hunt" them down. They claim MAGA supporters are commenting the location of their job on all of their videos, but the speaker no longer works there. According to the speaker, they were let go from their restaurant job because of the video. The speaker says they didn't even serve the MAGA table at the restaurant and didn't speak to them. They are asking MAGA supporters to leave their former job, coworkers, and managers alone. The speaker is upset that MAGA supporters are allegedly trying to target them at their job because they said that since they vote against Latinos, they shouldn't be able to enjoy Mexican food.

Yesterday, we had successful rallies in Wisconsin and Michigan. The economy is struggling due to high inflation, preventing interest rate cuts. The ongoing trial is baseless, with a biased judge. Law enforcement should focus on radical left movements, not targeting me. The left poses a threat that must be stopped to prevent the country's downfall. Law enforcement and the DOJ need to address the radical left within their ranks. Thank you.

Margie, there's a scandal in Georgia involving Fannie Willis, who is running an anti-Trump operation. She allegedly paid her boyfriend $650,000 and went on expensive trips with him using taxpayer money. Some people are arguing that this undermines the racketeering charges against them. It's also been revealed that her boyfriend had consulting ties with the Biden White House. Many Georgians, including myself, are fed up with Willis using her position and taxpayer dollars to target Trump and his allies instead of prosecuting real criminals. I'm urging Governor Kemp and Attorney General Chris Carr to investigate and prosecute Willis and her boyfriend for their corrupt actions. This witch hunt needs to end immediately.

Can't come in. Here’s the ticket. Why not? That’s what I was told. This is day one of the Tribeca Film Festival. I’m passing out flyers about Acorn, stating the investigation is real. I exposed facts about Acorn breaking the law, and they’re making a movie about it. Some people think I’m despicable. Did you know the New York Times confirmed the transcripts match the audio? You’re hurting America. I’m James O’Keefe, and I’m in the Acorn movie. You’re a convicted felon. Actually, I’ve never been convicted of that felony. You’re a racist. No, I’m not. People are angry at the truth. We’ll be back tomorrow to expose it.

The speaker questions someone about their involvement in questionable donations made through ActBlue. They mention talking to people in Maryland who denied making the donations listed on ActBlue's website. The speaker is asked to leave and threatened with arrest for trespassing at a location in Massachusetts.

I'm Chick Wilfa, on a road trip to a ranch. People I've met are upset about the Trump trial, questioning the fairness of the justice system. If they can do this to Trump, they can do it to anyone. The weaponization of the justice system is alarming, regardless of political beliefs. Trump himself said it's rigged. This should concern everyone.

Michigan voter data is described as a state secret that Jocelyn Benson is safeguarding from the federal government, with the speaker claiming she told authorities they can’t have it and contrasting this with the idea of not wanting the federal government to have your social security number. The speaker then alleges that Benson “gives our voter data away” to a nonprofit, and that she has done so since taking office in 2019. The nonprofit identified is the electronic registration information center, ERIC. The claim is not that Benson gives data away to ERIC per se, but that she spends taxpayer money to provide data to ERIC. The speaker contends that on television Benson presents herself as the guardian of voters’ data, while, in reality, she uses public funds to share it. After ERIC receives the voter data, the speaker says it is sent to another nonprofit, the Center for Election Innovation and Research, or CEIR. The common thread alleged between ERIC and CEIR is a liberal operative named David Becker, who is said to have founded both organizations. The speaker asserts that in 2020, Becker’s CEIR gave Benson’s nonprofit $12,000,000 on the eve of the election. The claim continues that Benson used part of this funding to purchase Jocelyn Benson campaign ads. The speaker notes that this year, Lansing Republicans attempted to pull Michigan out of ERIC, as eight other states had already left, but the Republicans could not secure the votes to do so. The transcript suggests that Republicans facing Benson in the governor’s race should make this a campaign issue. It is presented as an easy story on the campaign trail: Jocelyn Benson’s friends obtain Michigan voter data and are paid to manage it, while Michigan taxpayers fund both sides of the lawsuit between Benson and the U.S. Department of Justice. The speaker connects the financial support from CEIR to Benson’s nonprofit with the broader political dynamic involving Benson and the DOJ.

I hate drama. I hate influencer drama. I hate Internet drama. I hate the theatrics of it. And so I want to tell you something. The only reason that I'm going up against Crenshaw is I am sick and tired of watching government officials and people in high places try to silence and bully regular American citizens. I'm sick of saying it. Somebody's gotta stand up to this shit. It might as well be me. It might as well be me. On 12/09/2025, I received a legal demand letter from lawyers representing congressman Dan Crenshaw. They are threatening to sue me for defamation because of comments I made on my podcast about a message that he sent me. So this all transpired from a conversation that I had with Tulsi Gabbard. And I was concerned... Although I didn't mention his name in the interview... I wanted to know how a newer congressman can afford to hire a mainstream DJ, Steve Aoki, to spin at his fortieth birthday party. I didn't just make this up. Somebody sent me the invitation that he had sent out to everybody for his fortieth birthday. And so that's where I got this from. Anyways, here's the clip with Tulsi. Is there any direct money? I mean, know, you see all these people you see all these people show up in Congress, the Senate, the cabinet, whatever, and, you know, not wealthy. Yeah. Speaker 1: I don't have firsthand experience in this. I have often questioned the same thing. I know a big factor is the insider trading that goes on in Congress. And again, some people will say, well, like, hey, I didn't know anything about this. I'm just making investments for my family or my wife or my husband is making investments. I don't know anything about what's going on. Maybe they're being honest, maybe they're not. But the reality is you're in a position where you're making decisions, either in committee or on the House floor, that influence our markets, that influence the outcomes of certain industries, either causing some to tank or others to skyrocket. And the mere perception of insider trading shouldn't exist. This is legislation, again, I introduced in Congress years ago. No member of Congress should be allowed to do any trading of any stocks, neither should their spouse, neither should their senior staff. Period. These are the people who have access to proprietary private information that's not open to everybody in the public, or certainly before it becomes public. And the possibility of the abuse of power in trading on that information should not exist. It's interesting because as we're seeing there are some members of Congress who say that share my view on that, but who are continuing to trade stocks themselves. The Senate just passed, I think out of committee, first step legislation that would reflect similar to banning members and their spouses. We'll see where it goes. In the Senate we've heard a lot of talk coming from leaders from both parties, but no action has been taken. That to me is the most obvious way that people are going from being elected and having no money and you make, what, dollars $160 a year or whatever the salary is now to literally becoming multimillionaires. That is the most obvious way. There are kind of stringent requirements of financial reporting that every member has to do certainly at least once a year, more often if you are actively trading in stocks. But it I think it would be a little hard, not impossible, but a little hard if somebody's just coming and bringing you a sack of cash. Speaker 0: So after the conversation with Tulsi, that's when I got the text or the message on Instagram from congressman Crenshaw that I find threatening, telling me he spoke with his boys at six. Here's a screenshot. Hey, Sean. You have the ability to contact your fellow team guy if you've got a problem with me or have questions about how I'm getting rich. Some of my boys at six told me about your indirect swipe at me. Some of my beliefs are based on trendy narratives instead of facts. And just so you know, I mean, Dan does have a history of threatening people. Once again, here is Dan threatening to kill Tucker Carlson. And then, again, he reaffirms that he's not joking. Speaker 2: Have you ever met Tucker? Speaker 0: We've talked a lot. He's the worst person. Okay. So I get the message. I take it is extremely threatening. It is a tier one unit, the best, most effective tier one unit in the world, deadliest unit. But I don't do anything. I move on. And then a little over a year later, I'm interviewing, oh, a member from SEAL Team six. Maybe he's one of Dan's boys at six. So he brought up the fact that he had asked a congressman with an eye patch, didn't wanna mention his name, to help him with his book debacle. He received no aid. I filled in the blank. I said, oh, you must be talking about congressman Crenshaw. Let me share my experience with you, my interactions with congressman Crenshaw. So I shared him. I told him about the Instagram message, and I told him that I found that threatening. And then I asked Matt if he was one of Dan's boys at six, Maybe he was here to come beat me up. Matt assured me he wasn't. Here's the clip. Speaker 2: I'll give you another example. In the height of my my issues, I contacted a former SEAL. I won't name names, but he has an eye patch, And he's a congressman out of a state You Speaker 0: mean Dan Crenshaw? Speaker 2: I'm not naming names. Speaker 0: Another one of my Speaker 2: favorite Sir, here's my situation. You know, Dan? Speaker 0: Dan actually sent me a message. I should fucking read this to you. But, basically, he tells me I brought something up about him, and I never even met I gave him the courtesy of not even mentioning his fucking name. It was about his birthday party where he hired Steve Aoki to to DJ his birthday. I mean, that can't be fucking cheap. Right? Especially on a congressman's salary. And I brought that up. And Dan sends me a message that says his boys over at six are really upset with me that I brought that up, and they're gonna they might come beat me up. Speaker 2: Boys at six. Speaker 0: His boys over at six. Speaker 2: Well, to infer he's got I don't know why congressman would be Speaker 0: threatening me with seal team six, but I'm still fucking waiting. This is actually a couple years This Speaker 2: is threatened quite a Speaker 0: have not had my ass kicked by a couple of guys over at six. But Dan Crunchy he fits with all these fucking people you're talking about. Speaker 2: So I called him. Right? He's a sitting congressman. He's a former officer. And drum roll, please, he was getting ready to release his book. So I call him up. I get a conversation with him. I said, sir, here's my situation. I hired an attorney. The attorney gave me bad advice. Book was published. I've given up attorney client privilege, cooperated everything I can to to fix this. They've still come after me. We can get into all the the other stuff that I'm dealing with. I said, sir, can you help me out with this? He's like, well, you know, I'm I'm about ready to publish my book, and I'm I'm not getting it reviewed. I'm like, well, sir, same same letter of the law that they came after me for failure to seek prepublication review. I didn't get prepublication review because my lawyer told me I didn't have to, and he could do it. Like, in your case, you know you have to get reviewed. I'm here telling you, confirming you have to get reviewed or the government's gonna come after you. He's like, yeah. No. But I'm not gonna write anything classified in my book. I'm like, there's nothing classified in my book. They they said there was. They went through it. They said, nope. There's nothing classified in it. You just failed to seek review. I'm like, so if I only thing I failed to do was seek review, you're willingly going around that obligation, and you don't give a shit. He's like, yeah. But I'm not gonna write about anything classified in my book. That was his answer. Never talked to him again. So he published his book. No review. Nothing's happened. He's kept his money. He's a sitting congressman. I got a payment plan. So so to say I've been alone So Speaker 0: I guess I guess you're not one of Dan's boys over at six. Speaker 2: That's kinda Definitely not Dave Boys at six. That's a pretty ridiculous statement if I've ever heard one.

Is there a problem here? Excuse me? You're blocking the signs. I was moving my signs. You can't block them like that. I mean, you might think you can, but you can't. I'm in public, so I can record you. Well, that's okay. I'm an elected official. I don't care, but thank you. My name's Mary Anne Minnick, the elected committee woman for the Democratic Party in Moon District 6. Good for you. Thank you.

The speaker attended the Airhunters Association conference, where he received their endorsement, and also got Brett Favre's endorsement. He claims he's campaigning hard, traveling to all 72 Wisconsin counties to connect with voters, because a strong ground game is needed to combat his opponent's lies and media allies. The speaker believes conservatives in Wisconsin are awake and demonstrated this on November 5. He urges people to understand the Supreme Court race's effect on the House of Representatives and the entire country. He asks listeners to encourage friends and family in Wisconsin to vote early for Justice Schimmel, stating this election could decide the fate of the country. He claims Democrats are pouring money into attacking Justice Schimmel, who will ensure serious criminals go to jail, while his opponent wants to let them out of prison.

Yesterday, Randy Fine called me. He berated me for forty two minutes about the Florida governor's race, telling me that if I entered that race, there would be real problems for me in the future, telling me that it wouldn't be nice to Byron Donalds if I ran against him as if we don't have elections in this country. Randy, if Byron is such a good candidate, he'll trounce me. But the truth is Republicans are the ones who got trounced this week. Republicans got trounced because of people like you and Byron Donald's. People like you and Byron Donald's, all you get done is write strongly worded letters, go on CNN and Fox News and whine, and then come back to your districts and act like you got something done for Americans. It's an absolute joke. The only person who's working in Washington DC goes by the name of Donald j Trump. And the do nothing congressional Republicans, many of whom are good people, but the truth of the matter is that if Elon Musk emailed you guys and asked you what you got done this week, you would say absolutely nothing. Because you know what? Going on TV, whining on podcasts, and writing tweets does not count. That does not count as getting something done for hardworking Americans. But you know the beautiful thing about all of this is that you guys endorse each other. You and Byron are thick as thieves, which is quite fitting actually. You guys endorse each other. Byron, you endorsed Randy for his congressional reelection. So Byron, let me ask you. Do you endorse Randy Fine's comment on 07/22/2025 in which in response to children starving in Gaza, Randy said, quote, starve away. This is the problem. This is the problem with you congressional Republicans is you are not focused on delivering for America first. We did not vote for foreign wars. We did not vote for bombing other countries. We did not vote for any of that. We voted for America first, period. End of story. And what you guys have done has been a complete humiliation, a complete rejection of the historic landslide, the mandate that we as voters gave president Trump. Get back to DC, do your jobs, and actually deliver America first.

Speaker 0 says he went and hassled asked straightforward questions to Ted Cruz, describing Cruz as a sitting senator who was “serving for Israel by his own description,” and notes he isn’t targeting Marjorie Taylor Greene (MTG) because she’s “the most sincere.” He questions why not go after Cruz. Speaker 1 recalls being a friend of MTG; she spoke at his conference, then “the day after, she pretended like she didn't know me,” describing a history that began in 2022. He explains views evolve as people interact with reality and as the reality of self changes, adding that now “everyone agrees with me,” and he would forgive hostility. He says he doesn’t know what MTG’s new views are, noting she’s come around on Israel “this year,” whereas he has spoken on the issue for ten years. He characterizes the past as “ BS” and claims he was treated as if he didn’t exist, canceled for ten years for discussing these topics, particularly during a time of intense censorship. Speaker 1 mentions MTG fired one of his staffers because someone found out a groiper was working in her office, and that person’s life was ruined; MTG allegedly knew exactly what the conference was, yet she pretended not to. He says the issue isn’t personal with MTG, but argues the past disagreement was because she was “on the other team.” Speaker 0 counters that many people were on different sides in the past and suggests the question is bigger than themselves, aiming to restore America for future generations. Speaker 0 adds a personal note: if Dave Rubin called to apologize for calling him “Hitler,” he would consider it meaningful, and he sees legitimate questions to consider. He emphasizes sincerity as central, stating he believes sincerity shows when someone’s heart is pure, and that Joe Kent appeared sincere despite not agreeing on everything, which led Speaker 0 to think Kent was a good person. However, Speaker 0 says Kent was later discredited as being a CIA officer (or contractor), which contradicted their impression, and he recalls showing each other a badge during a mutual suspicion moment. Speaker 1 recalls being disavowed by MTG for his views on Israel and criticized for talking about white people and Christianity, and notes that he worked with Blumenthal on an article while Speaker 0 had called him on the phone. Speaker 0 reflects that the exchange felt “inside baseball” and insists he was seeking a sincere politician, someone brave, regardless of full agreement. He cites Joe Kent as an example of sincerity despite disagreements, and recounts being surprised by Speaker 1’s later revelation that Kent’s CIA association changed his view of Kent.

How's it going, Congressman Gayeho? I know you have a close friendship with Steven Richer, your neighbor. Did he assist you with the vote count in the election involving Carrie Lake? Given his opposition to her, do you think it's fair for him to be involved in counting votes while suing her? What are your thoughts on his intentions, especially since he reportedly wants to make things difficult for Carrie Lake? Is your relationship with Richer beneficial to you in this context?

The speaker identifies himself as a longtime representative for the common American, arguing that Washington’s political system of both parties uses Americans to fuel cycles of hatred, with no lasting improvement for everyday people. He claims the debt rises, corporate and global interests dominate, American jobs are replaced, small businesses are swallowed by large corporations, and tax dollars fund foreign wars and aid while the dollar’s spending power declines. He states that in recent years, many American families must rely on two earners, and his children’s generation feels hopeless about the American dream. He says he ran for Congress in 2020 with the belief that Make America Great Again meant America First, and emphasizes a conservative record defending the First and Second Amendments, unborn life, secure borders, and opposition to COVID mandates and funding of foreign wars. He complains that after almost a year in the majority, the legislature has been sidelined, citing an eight-week shutdown that left the House inactive, and notes that during campaign season “courage leaves” and “safe campaign reelection mode” dominates. He criticizes the House for failing to pass a plan to protect Americans’ healthcare and to address overpriced, unaffordable health insurance, accusing both parties of drama instead of working to fix the disaster. He describes his own bills as reflecting Trump-era priorities, including a new census to redraw districts, making English the official language, making it a felony to medically transition a minor, eliminating capital gains taxes on primary-home sales, and eliminating H-1B visas, but says they “sit … collecting dust” because the speaker does not bring them to floor votes. The speaker argues that ordinary Americans are no longer swayed by paid political propaganda; they live with rising costs, debt, and uncertainty, have faced job displacement by visa workers, and are burdened by student debt with limited high-paying job results. He recounts personal sacrifice: spending millions of his own money, missing time with family, and standing with Donald Trump against impeachment efforts. He describes facing constant personal attacks, death threats, and lawfare, and portrays a split within the Republican establishment that “secretly hates” Trump yet welcomes other figures after elections. He recalls supporting Trump against Democrat lawfare and defending him during impeachment votes, including choosing to vote no on the Democrat-led impeachment in 2021 while his father underwent brain surgery. He asserts his core stance against policies like the Green New Deal, broad open-border policies, and the trans agenda on children, while defending his loyalty to the party and to America First. He argues that if he is discarded by the president and the MAGA machine for neocons and elite interests, many common Americans would be similarly cast aside. He contends that real power lies with the people and promises to stay aligned with them if they reclaim control from Washington. He announces his resignation, with his last day on 01/05/2026, and expresses a desire to return to the people he loves while seeking a new path ahead, offering a blessing to the audience and to America.

I was arrested for protesting the election, faced prison time, and refused the COVID vaccine. Now, I'm running for US Congress to fight for America First policies. We need strong leaders to save our country. Thank you for watching and God bless America.

Speaker 0: Hi, Michiganders, specifically Detroiters. Do you guys care that Charlie Kirk has passed away? Yeah. I didn't think so because my district is primarily black people, and Charlie Kirk said awful things about black people. So, no, I think my district will like me because I advocate for them as a white person. So

Robin Vos discusses the role and perception of political leadership, media, and public discourse in Wisconsin and the broader United States. He begins with a personal anecdote about two Wisconsin speakers (himself and Paul Ryan) and how being “speaker” is understood differently in different places. He then gives his background: born and raised in Racine County, political activity since age 10, college involvement, county board, business owner, and a 2004 legislative career. He notes his early positioning as one of the far-right voices in the Wisconsin House, and how he changed as the world changed, including adopting Twitter in 2008 when the mainstream media resisted real-time updates from non-traditional outlets. Vos states two reasons for his presence: to address mainstream media and to reflect on how media coverage shaped politics. He acknowledges that he supported Marco Rubio, then Ted Cruz, and finally Donald Trump, arguing that a fair and unbiased media should be a base standard, though he asserts that most Americans do not believe it to be true. He cites campaign coverage as an example, noting that a loud, quotable candidate received over $6 billion in free coverage, while others received a fraction. He introduces a video compilation about Wisconsin media coverage, including stories on the John Doe investigation into Governor Scott Walker’s recall campaign, national media attention, leaked documents, and coverage of Tom Steyer’s activities to mobilize young voters against Walker and in support of Tammy Baldwin. He contrasts Steyer’s portrayal with the lack of coverage given to the Koch brothers’ similar activities, arguing that media treats some actors as altruistic and others as cynical, depending on ideology. Vos criticizes the media for leaking information from the John Doe process and for pre-judging outcomes, which he says violated state law and undermined fair reporting. He argues that the Guardian’s publication of John Doe documents amplified a narrative before opportunity for response, and that mainstream outlets often mischaracterize or selectively present information, shaping public opinion. He reflects on how people now distrust traditional outlets and turn to social media and “citizen journalism,” sometimes through partisan lenses. He recounts a personal experience with Barb Shear and Charlie Sykes to illustrate how people can misinterpret in-room dynamics when they only hear secondhand narratives. He laments that reporting often neglects open, two-sided discussion, which he sees as essential for accountability and good policy. Vos advocates three concrete reforms for journalists and policymakers: champion free speech (including reporting on campuses where opposing voices are barred or protests hinder dialogue), encourage thoughtful conversations that occur before breaking news, and push for fair reporting that presents both sides and allows nuanced debate. He argues that good journalism should enhance public understanding, not fragment it, and he emphasizes that relationships and pre-meeting negotiations in legislatures lead to better policy than sensational front-page stories. Toward the end, Vos highlights Wisconsin’s historical role in progressivism and conservatism, urging reporters and reformers to focus on open debate, bipartisanship, and policies that unify rather than divide. He warns that failing to do so will deepen national polarization and benefit only those who profit from division. He closes by reiterating the importance of free speech, thoughtful dialogue, and fair reporting as foundational to a healthy democracy.

Derek Evans, a January 6th political prisoner, is running for congress with Trump to "drain the swamp." Endorsed by Trump allies, he aims to fight against "corrupt" Carol Miller. Visit corruptcarol.com to learn more. Vote for Derek Evans on May 14th for a pro-Trump, MAGA agenda.

I met Rob and Ma during a rally in Alabama after a silent symposium in South Dakota. I got introduced to Michael Gableman, who I flew to Wisconsin to meet. We argued but ended up becoming friends. He promised to investigate everything in Wisconsin. I told our real president that Gableman is bold and determined. He's not giving up the fight.