TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

We're committed to improving our election processes, advocating for paper ballots, one-day voting, voter ID, and proof of citizenship. We're actively monitoring for election fraud, filing lawsuits when necessary, and ensuring transparency in vote counting. Michelle Swinick discusses election integrity in Maricopa County, Arizona, highlighting discrepancies in ballot counts and the need for a U.S. senator to initiate a hearing. She emphasizes the importance of public engagement to demand accountability and transparency in elections. Swinick presents evidence of significant ballot discrepancies and illegal recounts, urging the public to push for investigations into these issues. She calls for action to restore trust in the electoral process and ensure fair elections moving forward. The discussion underscores the critical role of citizen involvement in safeguarding democracy.

After October 7th, we established a comprehensive monitoring system in the U.S. to track elected officials at all levels, including school boards. This involves scrutinizing social media, press releases, and official documents. We are keeping a close eye on city councils and their voting records, ensuring we know how each member voted. Our goal is to monitor their actions throughout their careers and work to hold them accountable.

A town clerk in Hudson Township, Wisconsin, a town of 8,000 people, makes a $104,000 salary for working Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday. The new township chairman raised concerns about the clerk's salary at a recent town hall meeting. The chairman conducted a wage study and found the clerk's salary is double that of other clerks in similar-sized Wisconsin townships. The hourly rate is comparable to the governor's salary, at $84 per hour. The town hall was closed, so the clerk's opinion was not available. The township chairman, who began his position in April, stated that the town board will discuss the issue in a closed session with legal counsel to determine how the situation arose and the next steps.

We're committed to improving elections in our country, focusing on paper ballots, one-day voting, voter ID, and proof of citizenship. We are actively monitoring for election fraud, filing lawsuits when necessary, and ensuring transparency in the voting process. Michelle Swinick discusses significant discrepancies in the 2024 election results in Maricopa County, Arizona, emphasizing that one U.S. senator can initiate a hearing to address these issues. She highlights the importance of public records and the need for citizen engagement to demand accountability from senators. The conversation underscores the potential for election results to be contested based on statistical anomalies and legal violations, urging the public to take action for electoral integrity. This is a call to ensure fair elections and hold officials accountable for any misconduct.

Harry Waite openly admitted to illegally requesting absentee ballots for Racine mayor Corey Mason and Republican assembly speaker Robin Voss in an attempt to expose a voter fraud loophole. Two of the three ballots he received were from individuals who gave him permission, while the third was Mayor Mason's. The Wisconsin Department of Justice is investigating the matter, but Waite believes someone should have caught the issue before the ballots were sent out. Mayor Mason believes Waite's actions are an attempt to make voting more difficult in future elections. Waite plans to return the unopened ballot to city hall.

In Arizona, Maricopa County officials were served for treason by residents, leading to their departure from a meeting. A woman named Michelle warned them of their liability and potential military tribunal. The goal is to encourage Americans to hold government officials accountable. Information about this incident is being removed online. Updates are scarce, but comments are welcome.

The Wisconsin Supreme Court race is critical because it will determine the court's majority. This is important due to gerrymandered congressional lines in Wisconsin, which currently favor Republicans. Although Wisconsin is a fifty-fifty state, its congressional delegation consists of six Republicans and two Democrats. Revisiting and establishing fair congressional lines is crucial, but can only happen with an "enlightened" Supreme Court. Therefore, the outcome of the Supreme Court race has significant implications for fair representation in Wisconsin.

We've achieved victories that truly impact lives, and we've also strategically used the courts to expose issues. Take, for instance, the so-called Department of Government Efficiency. While efficiency is the aim, firing inspector generals, who are meant to eliminate corruption, waste, fraud, and abuse, defeats that purpose. We recognize this as a sham and have initiated multiple lawsuits. In response, the courts have, at times, slowed or even halted the department. Other times, the courts have ordered discovery. This allows us to ask questions and inform the public. Our goal extends beyond securing court rulings; it's about enforcing public accountability. The courts serve as a mechanism to protect our rights and empower us with knowledge to hold our lawmakers accountable.

In Chihuahua, Mexico, a local anti-corruption nonprofit called Curewa addressed the lack of transparency in their municipal government. They collaborated with Mexican NGOs, the United Nations Development Program, and the US Agency for International Development to create a digital platform. This platform tracks and publishes open municipal contracts, allowing constituents to monitor how their tax dollars are spent. As a result, all municipal contracts in Chihuahua City are now published online. The success of this tool has led to its expansion, with 15 other city and state governments in Mexico adopting it. This initiative aims to reduce corruption, increase public participation, and build trust in government.

California government is spending $837,000 per tiny home for the homeless, way more than the $25100 retail price. With a $73 billion deficit, they could have housed all 160,000 homeless for much less. Residents should focus on local government corruption rather than the presidential race.

A town board approved a deal for a battery plant that would bring jobs and investment, but the citizens were unhappy with the company's ties to the Communist Chinese Party. As a result, they ousted the entire local government. The new board member emphasized that the democratic process works when people get involved and educate themselves on the issues. The goal of the new government is to prevent the Chinese-owned company from coming to their town. The chances of stopping the factory seem good, as the new board can change zoning rules and file a lawsuit. The citizens' fight was not only against the town board, but also against the supporters of the company.

Some states are allowing votes to be received and counted after election day, which contradicts federal law that designates the first Tuesday after the first Monday in November as election day. This practice raises concerns about potential fraud and undermines voter confidence. Judicial Watch is currently suing Illinois and Mississippi for permitting ballots to be counted days or weeks after election day, as long as they are dated on or before that day. Judicial Watch is committed to ensuring fair and honest elections and is prepared to take necessary actions to uphold the law.

The speaker discusses the involvement of the Office of Special Counsel and the actions taken by David Plouffe and CTCL. They highlight how Plouffe allocated funds from Zuckerberg to select cities without any applications. Additionally, they mention the $28 million in grants given to five cities in Wisconsin. The speaker suggests that this money was used to influence the African American vote in Milwaukee, as stated by Plouffe in a 2016 editorial. They argue that these actions were part of a partisan effort, supported by contracts that bound the cities to follow the directives of CTCL and Plouffe.

We have lawyers in all 50 states collaborating with civil rights organizations, governors, and mayors to combat right-wing extremism. Governors like Maura Healey of Massachusetts and Gavin Newsom of California are already taking a stand, similar to actions during the first Trump administration. Local leaders are uniting to resist federal government attacks on their communities, focusing on protecting not just immigrants but also dissidents and protesters targeted by Trump. We are actively working with these officials to create a protective barrier around our communities.

The speaker raises concerns about the Center for Tech and Civic Life's involvement in election administration processes. They mention an email where an employee from the center suggests embedding a middle management staff member in the Milwaukee Election Commission. The speaker believes this is going too far and emphasizes the need for transparency and accountability in elections. They also mention the director of the Wisconsin Elections Commission discussing the grants provided by the CTCL.

Grassroots Democrats, mirroring tactics used to engage with their own representatives, are now targeting senators to prevent a government shutdown. Groups like Indivisible are focusing their resources on pressuring senators to hold the line against Trump. Indivisible is framing their efforts through the lens of Musk or us. They are reimbursing protesters, whether at town halls or elsewhere, hundreds of dollars for criticizing the Trump administration and supporting senators who might prevent a government shutdown.

Judicial Watch uses the National Voter Registration Act to compel states and localities to clean up voter rolls. They cite successes in California (1,200,000 names removed), New York City (nearly 450,000 names), Washington DC, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Kentucky, and Colorado. Lawsuits are ongoing in California, Illinois, and Oregon. States are reportedly not taking basic steps to regularly clean up voter rolls. Judicial Watch's litigation has led to the removal of over 4,000,000 names from voter rolls in the last two years.

The Wisconsin Supreme Court race is a fifty-fifty contest with a strong Democratic candidate. The outcome will determine the court's majority, which is crucial because of gerrymandered congressional lines in Wisconsin. Despite Wisconsin being a fifty-fifty state, Republicans hold six out of eight congressional seats due to these lines. Revisiting and establishing fair lines requires an "enlightened" Supreme Court. The election's result is therefore critical for the possibility of achieving fair congressional districts.

Milwaukee election director Claire Woodall Bogg was fired without reason. Allegations suggest she printed 64,000 extra ballots for Joe Biden in the 2020 election. Concerns arise about future elections, but Republicans have already filed lawsuits in swing states to ensure legal review if irregularities occur again. This proactive approach differs from the past when lawsuits were dismissed before evidence could be heard due to legal technicalities.

We've been trying to elect good candidates in local elections but keep losing by narrow margins. After a recent election, we suspected cheating, especially after hearing claims about fraud in Detroit. While checking the voting list for a recall, I found friends who had been registered to vote without their knowledge, despite never voting. This pattern continued when I looked into my own voting history after moving to Ohio, where I was also registered back in Detroit without consent. I discovered many others in similar situations, including someone who had never voted but was used in multiple elections. We obtained a massive list of voters from the clerk's office to investigate further.

A government employee was fired for allegedly helping to rig the 2020 presidential election in favor of Joe Biden. She printed 64,000 ballots in City Hall, had ballots filled out by city employees, kicked out observers, and brought in more ballots illegally. An email from a coworker mentioned delivering just enough votes at 3 AM. This may explain how Biden suddenly surged ahead in Wisconsin. The woman has been fired, and this incident needs further investigation. This could have led to Biden having more ballots, not necessarily more votes.

The investigation into fraud in public daycare subsidies is described as massive and deeply obstructed. "Massive. They don't want a fraud unit to do anything. They want a fraud unit on paper." The discussion centers on Halicki, who was fired in 2013 while in the midst of a large probe. The county’s account of Halicki is that he was an insubordinate bully whose tactics hampered efforts to catch welfare cheats, while supporters call the firing part of a broader effort to suppress accountability. One side frames the situation as a cover up: “They don't wanna point fingers at various organizations and people. This is nothing but a giant cover up.” The reporting highlights deco daycare centers, with evidence that the company collected millions in public subsidies for providing bogus child care services to low income families. The overarching assertion is that, in essence, this scheme was a criminal enterprise. In December, Ramsey County charged the owner of Dico with fraud. The daycares shown are described as billing the county at rates over $100,000 a month. Halicki says that before his dismissal he was tracking a similar scheme in Hennepin County involving multiple child care centers. One building is noted as housing its third daycare center in as many years, with a new license granted despite concerns. The two previous centers had their public subsidies stopped by the county because of billing irregularities. Halicki recounts footage of centers with questionable visibility: “7AM to 6PM. There are no lights on.” He and the team visited centers that had no signs outside and, during posted business hours, no one answered. They checked state inspection records for each center on Halecki's tour, finding licensing violations—the kind that are red flags to the state's Department of Human Services. The core accusation is that this is a deliberate attempt by officials in Hennepin County to deceive taxpayers. Halicki claims to possess emails and documents proving knowledge of the wrongdoing and deliberate inaction. He cites an email to the supervisor of the fraud unit where the stated goal was to stop the bleeding quickly and protect taxpayer money from going out the door; the supervisor replies with a plan to tackle the centers, and Halicki reiterates, “It's nothing but a giant cover up.” Officials emphasize that the focus is on prevention, but they do investigate and take action with the county attorney when fraud occurs. In the two years since Halicki was fired, not one case has been prosecuted by the county. The report notes that most metro counties aren’t actively investigating daycare center fraud; instead, they’re handing those cases off to a DHS special team that was ramped up more than a year ago. Public frustration is voiced: “Nobody is more frustrated with the amount of time it's taking than we are.”

California government officials, advised by Biden's PR operation, collaborated with the California Secretary of State to censor Judicial Watch. The same PR firm worked with both Biden's campaign and the Secretary of State. This collaboration led to YouTube censoring Judicial Watch's video just before the 2020 election. This government censorship and election interference violated our civil rights and the rights of Judicial Watch supporters. Our lawsuit aims to expose the corruption of leftist government officials colluding with big tech to attack American citizens' free speech rights.

The transcript describes a live segment about an operation called “operation pull up,” described as clandestine and clandestine in nature, with the aim of disrupting business as usual by showing up somewhere locations where they are not expected. The host, Speaker 0, explains that although the operation may appear MAGA-coded due to the presence of many white people, there is a stated reason for this: “it's because of the the what they're the operation that they're doing today. It's important to have allies, as they said, white allies here.” The host notes turning the camera away from some participants because they are “giving some critical information here,” then signals that the team is ready to proceed. Nakima Levy Armstrong, identified as a civil rights attorney and longtime activist in the community, is introduced on the show. Armstrong is associated with Friday’s appearance on the program and is described as part of the movement’s leadership. The segment then defines the core tactic of the movement: “operation pull up, more of a clandestine operation. We show up somewhere location. They don't expect us to come there, and then we disrupt business as usual.” This explanation frames the operation as an intentional surprise tactic aimed at creating disruption at targeted sites. The group emphasizes their track record of success with previous demonstrations conducted under the same method. Specifically, they mention actions taken after George Floyd’s death, where they “went to the police federation head's, home and staged a demonstration there.” They also reference attention to federal law enforcement, noting they “went to the head of the US marshals from Minnesota after Winston Smith was killed by the US marshals.” Additional examples include action taken after Daunte Wright’s death, with a mention that this followed when AG Keith Ellis—presumably Keith Ellison—was involved, though the transcript cuts off before completing that description. Overall, the narrative centers on a strategic, surprise-based protest approach designed to create disruption at chosen targets, with a history of proactive demonstrations aimed at police and federal authorities following fatalities involving Black individuals. The speakers signal that the operation is ongoing and that more details will be observed as it unfolds live on the Don Lemon Show. The dialogue also underscores the organizers’ insistence on the value of diverse coalition support, noting the presence of white allies as part of the operation’s stated rationale.

I met Rob and Ma during a rally in Alabama after a silent symposium in South Dakota. I got introduced to Michael Gableman, who I flew to Wisconsin to meet. We argued but ended up becoming friends. He promised to investigate everything in Wisconsin. I told our real president that Gableman is bold and determined. He's not giving up the fight.