TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Kansas is filing a civil suit against Pfizer under the Kansas Consumer Protection Act for misleading statements in marketing its COVID-19 vaccine, violating previous consent judgments. This is the first of a multistate collaboration. The suit alleges Pfizer marketed its vaccine as safe for pregnant women, despite possessing reports of adverse events and miscarriages in pregnant women who received the vaccine, and a study suggesting links to infertility in rats. Pfizer denied links between its vaccine and myocarditis/pericarditis, even though the US government, military, and foreign governments had found such a connection. Pfizer claimed its vaccine protected against variants, but data showed it was effective less than half the time. Pfizer urged vaccination to protect loved ones, implying it stopped transmission, but later admitted it never studied transmission. Pfizer allegedly coordinated with social media platforms to censor critical speech. Pfizer declined Operation Warp Speed funding to avoid government oversight. By February 2024, Pfizer delivered over 3.3 million vaccine doses in Kansas, accounting for over 60% of all doses given. The suit focuses on deceptive marketing, not injury claims, as vaccine manufacturers have federal immunity for tort suits.

In January 2021, Brooke Jackson filed a lawsuit against Pfizer, claiming that she witnessed the company defraud the US government by lacking oversight in the making and distribution of vaccines. She was particularly concerned about the absence of clinical trials and safety protocols. Pfizer countered the lawsuit by stating that the US government was already aware of the lack of clinical trials and safety protocols. They provided evidence in the form of a base agreement, stating that there was no legal obligation to conduct valid clinical trials because the government's payment was for a large-scale manufacturing demonstration, not for clinical trials.

Kansas is filing a civil suit against Pfizer under the Kansas Consumer Protection Act for misleading marketing of its COVID-19 vaccine. This lawsuit, part of a multistate collaboration, highlights several deceptive practices. Pfizer falsely claimed its vaccine was safe for pregnant women, despite data showing adverse events and miscarriages. It denied links between its vaccine and heart conditions like myocarditis, despite evidence to the contrary. Pfizer also misrepresented the vaccine's effectiveness against variants and claimed it prevented transmission without conducting relevant studies. Additionally, Pfizer coordinated with social media to censor criticism of its vaccine. This suit follows Pfizer delivering over 3.3 million vaccine doses in Kansas, accounting for over 60% of the state's total. The case aims to address misleading marketing practices, as vaccine manufacturers have immunity from tort suits for injuries.

COVID-19 genetic injections allegedly cause more harm than good, offering no benefit for the young and healthy, and do not reduce infection. Data purportedly shows vaccinated individuals are more likely to be infected, diseased, or die compared to the unvaccinated. These treatments can damage the heart, brain, reproductive tissue, and lungs, potentially causing permanent immune system damage. Pfizer allegedly did not test the vaccine on stopping transmission before market release. COVID vaccines are described as toxic, lethal, ineffective, and harmful, damaging the brain, heart, liver, and bone marrow. Misinformation from the CDC, FDA, and medical organizations is allegedly causing death and injury, especially in women of reproductive age and pre-born babies. The spike protein produced by the vaccines may never leave the body. Pharmaceutical companies allegedly withheld safety and effectiveness information, with the injections causing the expression of toxic spike protein that distributes widely and has no built-in limit. Clinical trials showed questionable practices, including unblinding and subject removal suggestive of fraud. The vaccines are allegedly killing large numbers of people and fulfill causality criteria for causing death. Illegal advertising of vaccines as safe and effective, without mentioning risks, violates advertising laws. Charges of fraud and mass negligent homicide are suggested due to wrongful advertising, defrauding the country, lack of early treatment, and vaccine-induced deaths.

The speaker claims Pfizer documents reveal the COVID vaccines didn't work to stop the virus a month after rollout in November 2020. They allege Pfizer knew the third most common side effect was COVID. Within months, Pfizer supposedly needed to hire 2,400 staffers to process adverse event reports. The speaker asserts Pfizer and the FDA knew in May 2021 that the vaccines caused heart damage in 35 minors within a week of injection, but this wasn't disclosed to parents until August 2021. The speaker states the CDC initially claimed the injection materials stayed at the injection site, but Pfizer knew they biodistributed throughout the body within 48 hours, settling in the brain, liver, adrenals, spleen, and ovaries. Pathologist Dr. Robert Chandler allegedly found no mechanism for the body to eliminate lipid nanoparticles from the ovaries, leading to accumulation with each injection.

Kansas is filing a civil suit against Pfizer under the Kansas Consumer Protection Act for misleading marketing of its COVID-19 vaccine. This lawsuit, part of a multistate initiative, highlights several deceptive claims made by Pfizer. Key allegations include misrepresenting the vaccine's safety for pregnant women, downplaying the connection to heart conditions like myocarditis, overstating effectiveness against variants, and falsely claiming it prevented transmission. Additionally, Pfizer coordinated with social media to censor criticism of its vaccine. Despite federal immunity from tort suits, Pfizer is still accountable for misleading marketing practices. The suit aims to hold Pfizer accountable for its actions, which contributed to the distribution of over 3.3 million vaccine doses in Kansas.

The speaker claims the Shimabukuro study published in the New England Journal of Medicine on 04/21/2021, misrepresented miscarriage rates, reporting 12.6% when raw data allegedly showed 82% in women vaccinated during the first trimester. The speaker alleges conflicts of interest and misrepresentations by CDC Director Rochelle Walensky and Journal Editor in Chief Eric Rubin in publications intended to coerce pregnant women into taking vaccines. The speaker asserts that subsequent studies claiming vaccine safety during pregnancy are compromised by biased funding, institutional mandates, and threats to medical licenses. Pharmaceutical companies allegedly paid $1,060,000,000 to reviewers at leading medical journals between 2020 and 2022, corrupting the peer review process. Safety signals were allegedly ignored in at least six studies from CDC, FDA, and Pfizer. The speaker states their team published a study on 02/08/2025, identifying 37 adverse pregnancy outcomes significantly associated with COVID-19 vaccines. They cite a study documenting the vaccine traversing the placenta and producing spike protein in the placenta and uterus, and animal studies revealing destruction of ovarian reserve. The speaker urges halting funding to organizations like ACOG and SMFM and ending promotional campaigns for mRNA therapies in pregnant women.

The speaker claims that women who received the vaccine in the first trimester had an 82% miscarriage rate. They state that this is the same miscarriage rate observed in the Pfizer 5.3.6 post-market analysis.

According to the speaker, Pfizer documents reveal that one month after the vaccine rollout in November 2020, Pfizer knew the vaccines didn't stop COVID and identified vaccine failure. Within months, the company allegedly needed to hire 2,400 staffers to process adverse event reports. The speaker claims Pfizer knew in May 2021 that the vaccines caused heart damage in 35 minors within a week of injection, but this information wasn't shared with parents until August 2021. The speaker alleges that the CDC initially stated the injection materials stayed in the injection site, but Pfizer knew these materials biodistribute throughout the body within 48 hours, settling in the brain, liver, adrenals, spleen, and ovaries. The speaker asserts that there is no mechanism for the body to eliminate lipid nanoparticles from the ovaries, leading to accumulation with each injection.

Kansas is filing a civil suit against Pfizer under the Kansas Consumer Protection Act, seeking penalties and damages for misleading marketing of its COVID-19 vaccine. This lawsuit is part of a multistate effort involving five states. The complaint details several misleading claims, including that the vaccine was safe for pregnant women despite evidence of adverse events and miscarriages. Pfizer also denied links between its vaccine and heart conditions like myocarditis, despite known risks. Additionally, Pfizer claimed its vaccine was effective against variants and could stop transmission, but later admitted it had not studied transmission. The suit emphasizes that Pfizer's misleading statements contributed to its vaccine's success in Kansas, where over 3.3 million doses were administered. The case focuses on marketing practices, asserting that Pfizer's actions violated its obligation to provide truthful information.

We found that the FDA lied about a maternal rat study that was testing the safety of mandating a vaccine to pregnant women. In every litter, individual pups had horrible bone deformities. This signal was extremely prominent. Moderna submitted the rat study, as they were required to do. The FDA then lied about the study results by claiming there were no problems. It was a huge enterprise in lying.

A Pfizer whistleblower has revealed documents indicating over 158,000 reports of adverse reactions from December 2020 to February 2021, including serious issues like spontaneous abortions. It is claimed that the FDA was aware of these reactions and sought to keep the documents hidden for 75 years, suggesting intentional harm. The whistleblower argues that the vaccine remains on the market despite serious concerns, highlighting a double standard compared to previous vaccine removals for fewer adverse events. There is a call for accountability for those involved in this situation.

The speaker discusses a New England Journal of Medicine study from April 21, 2021, and an accompanying op-ed by Eric Rubin, Stephen Morrissey, and Rochelle Walensky, alleging they made false and fear-mongering statements about the risks to pregnant women, unborn children, and newborns if they didn't get vaccinated. This was allegedly done despite evidence suggesting pregnancy reduced maternal mortality and data showing the COVID-19 vaccine was the deadliest and most injurious vaccine ever released. The speaker claims the study, authored by 21 federal employees including Tom Shimabukuro, was biased. Out of 827 pregnant women in the study, they highlight a claimed miscarriage rate of 12.6%, which they argue is abnormally high compared to the normal rate of 3% at a normal booking visit. They allege that 700 of the women received the vaccine in their third trimester, but were artificially placed in the first trimester data. This allegedly skewed the miscarriage rate for women vaccinated in the first trimester to 82%, which is the same miscarriage rate seen in the Pfizer post-market data.

The speaker asserts that the Pfizer documents reveal the greatest crime against humanity in recorded history and that the documents focus specifically on destroying reproduction. They claim that Pfizer knew they were blocking women's ovaries with lipid nanoparticles and that these nanoparticles traversed the placenta. They contend the deaths of fetuses were due to maternal exposure to the vaccine, described as “maternal exposure quote unquote to the vaccine.” The speaker states that vaccinated women who were nursing their babies were making the babies sick, citing charts showing thousands of babies vomiting, thousands with edema (swollen flesh), and thousands with convulsions. They claim one baby died of multi-organ system failure from nursing vaccinated moms. They further assert that, to this day, in places like the Netherlands and across Europe and the world, vaccinated moms are not being told they can risk their babies’ lives by nursing them. The speaker alleges Pfizer knew these risks and references a section of the Pfizer documents noting an over eighty percent spontaneous abortion or miscarriage rate. They further claim Pfizer knows there is something in the semen of vaccinated men that is possibly dangerous to women or fetuses, because they warn vaccinated men not to have intercourse with childbearing-age women and to use “two reliable forms of contraception.” They assert that the injection doesn’t stay at the injection site but travels throughout the body within forty-eight hours, accumulating in the adrenals, the spleen, the lymphatic system, and the liver, crossing the blood-brain barrier to cause brain-damage-type reactions, and accumulating in the ovaries. They claim it is damaging the hearts of minors and reference FOIA documents from the White House, noting a scramble in April 2021 to cover this up. The speaker concludes that the shots were propagated to parents during that summer and into the next year, advocating for vaccinating minors while knowing they were injuring or killing them. They describe the actions as ongoing dissemination and promotion of vaccination for minors despite the asserted harms.

Kansas is suing Pfizer for deceptive marketing of its COVID-19 vaccine, violating previous agreements. Pfizer misled on safety for pregnant women, heart conditions, variant protection, and transmission. They censored criticism and avoided government oversight. Despite this, Pfizer delivered over 3.3 million doses in Kansas. This lawsuit is the first of a potential multistate effort.

The speaker asserts the "golden rule of pregnancy" is to never use unproven drugs or vaccines, a rule they claim was broken during COVID. They allege that Pfizer's post-marketing analysis of approximately 29 pregnant mothers showed a 97% pregnancy loss. They claim real-world data from hospital systems indicates a 50% to 67% pregnancy loss rate when women are vaccinated during pregnancy, leading to obscene stillbirth numbers and early pregnancy losses. The speaker attributes these losses to the toxic spike protein from vaccines crossing the placenta and harming the fetus. They state that vaccinating pregnant women was a mistake based on lies and that it is now known to be unsafe, especially for mothers and their children.

Kansas is filing a civil suit against Pfizer under the Kansas Consumer Protection Act for misleading marketing of its COVID-19 vaccine. This lawsuit, part of a multistate effort, highlights several deceptive claims made by Pfizer. Key issues include claims of vaccine safety for pregnant women, despite evidence of adverse events and miscarriages; denial of a link between the vaccine and heart conditions like myocarditis; overstated effectiveness against COVID-19 variants; and false assertions about preventing virus transmission. Additionally, Pfizer coordinated with social media to censor criticism of its vaccine. Despite federal immunity from tort suits, Pfizer is still obligated to avoid misleading the public in its marketing practices. The suit aims to hold Pfizer accountable for its deceptive statements.

A recent study suggests that Pfizer may have excluded known deaths in the vaccine arm of its clinical trial from its data filing with the FDA in 2020. The study also found that trial subjects vaccinated with Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine experienced a significant increase in cardiovascular deaths compared to placebo controls. This information was not disclosed by Pfizer when the FDA was evaluating the vaccine for emergency use. Additionally, researchers identified instances where Pfizer attributed potential vaccine-associated deaths to other causes, undermining vaccine safety data. The data presented to the FDA prior to the authorization of Pfizer's vaccine did not include all the deaths that occurred during the trial. The speaker raises concerns about the prioritization of profit over lives and warns against trusting Big Pharma.

Pfizer marketed its vaccine as safe for pregnant women, but reports showed adverse events and miscarriages. They denied a link between their vaccine and heart conditions, despite evidence. Pfizer claimed effectiveness against variants, but data showed otherwise. They also misled about transmission and censored criticism on social media. Pfizer avoided government oversight in vaccine development. Despite these issues, Pfizer successfully marketed their vaccine in Kansas. Multiple states are filing suits against Pfizer.

The speaker claims the Pfizer documents reveal the "greatest crime against humanity in recorded history," with a specific focus on destroying reproduction, indicating a depopulation agenda. They assert Pfizer knew lipid nanoparticles were blocking women's ovaries and traversing the placenta, determining fetal deaths were due to maternal vaccine exposure. The speaker alleges Pfizer knew vaccinated nursing mothers were making babies sick, citing charts showing thousands of babies experiencing vomiting, edema, and convulsions, with one death from multi-organ system failure. They claim no one is warning vaccinated mothers about the risks to their babies. According to the speaker, Pfizer documents show over an 80% spontaneous abortion/miscarriage rate and warn vaccinated men to avoid intercourse with women of childbearing age or use two forms of contraception. The speaker states Pfizer knew the injection travels throughout the body, accumulating in various organs including the ovaries, and damaging the hearts of minors. They claim lawyers have FOIA documents showing a White House scramble in April 2021 to cover this up.

Pfizer documents show an 80% miscarriage rate in pregnant women. 236 out of 270 records were lost. Babies in utero were exposed to the vaccine, leading to deaths. Breast milk was poisoned by vaccine components, causing convulsions and deaths. Newborns may have air sacs between lungs and chest walls, leading to respiratory distress. Pfizer knew about this issue 2 years prior.

Experts, including the speaker, believe that the COVID-19 vaccine is safe for pregnant women based on extensive research. The vaccines have been proven safe and effective in the general population, without affecting fertility rates. They also provide protection against COVID-19 for pregnant women. The speaker, if pregnant, would definitely get vaccinated as the risks of the vaccine are much lower than the risks of the disease itself. Even children are eager to get vaccinated to regain their normal lives. However, another speaker raises concerns about fetal and chromosomal malformations, premature births, and respiratory issues after mRNA injections. They accuse pharmaceutical companies of hiding information about the deaths of two babies due to transplacental exposure to the vaccine. They call for attorney generals to investigate these claims. The Moderna documents are said to contain similar shocking information.

The speaker claims the Pfizer papers reveal an intentional attack on human sexuality, especially on women and babies. They allege Pfizer killed babies, poisoned breast milk, damaged placentas, and lowered sperm count, knowing the consequences. The speaker states that Pfizer has a chart documenting injuries to babies and disruptions to women's menstrual cycles, and concluded that babies were dying in utero due to maternal vaccine exposure. This information allegedly went to Dr. Walensky, who then recommended the COVID vaccine before, during, or after pregnancy. The speaker accuses Pfizer of trying to kill and sterilize people, resulting in deaths and fertility struggles. They cite a thirteen to twenty percent drop in live births and conclude that despite these attempts, the truth has emerged.

Pfizer is being sued for defrauding the government, but they claim they did not commit fraud. They argue they provided what the government requested, even if it was a faulty product distributed worldwide. This information is crucial and not widely known.

Kansas is filing a civil suit against Pfizer under the Kansas Consumer Protection Act for misleading statements in marketing its COVID-19 vaccine, violating previous consent judgments. This is the first of a multistate collaboration. The suit alleges Pfizer marketed its vaccine as safe for pregnant women, despite possessing reports of adverse events and miscarriages in vaccinated pregnant women, and a study suggesting links to infertility in rats. Pfizer denied links between its vaccine and myocarditis/pericarditis, even though government sources had found such a connection. The suit claims Pfizer overstated the vaccine's effectiveness against variants and implied it stopped transmission without having studied this. Pfizer allegedly coordinated with social media platforms to censor critical speech. Pfizer declined federal vaccine development funding to avoid government oversight. By February 2024, Pfizer had delivered over 3.3 million vaccine doses in Kansas, accounting for over 60% of all doses given. The suit focuses on deceptive marketing practices, not injury claims, as vaccine manufacturers have federal immunity for those.