reSee.it - Related Video Feed

I have a PhD in virology and immunology. After testing 1500 samples, we found no COVID, only influenza A and B. Other labs confirmed our findings. CDC couldn't provide viable COVID samples. We believe COVID is fictitious, and the 225,000 deaths were due to comorbidities. We are suing the CDC for COVID fraud. The genomic extracts of COVID were not successfully isolated. COVID is just another flu strain, not a real virus.

Are you a conspiracy theorist? That label has been used against me to silence tough questions about powerful interests. I pointed out early on that the COVID vaccine didn't prevent transmission or infection, contrary to government claims. I was labeled a conspiracy theorist for saying red dye causes cancer, which the FDA has now banned. I also mentioned that fluoride lowers IQ, and a recent JAMA review confirmed a direct correlation between fluoride exposure and IQ loss. Is there any claim you can say was truly a conspiracy theory, or do you stand by your position?

A speaker states that a large segment of the public feels betrayed by scientists who won't admit fault regarding COVID-19. They want to know why they were lied to and no longer care about lab funding. The speaker asks what the scientific community needs to say about lockdowns, masks, and vaccines to restore trust. Another speaker responds that they were a vocal advocate against lockdowns, mask mandates, vaccine mandates, and the anti-scientific approach of public health during the pandemic. They also believe that scientific institutions should be transparent about their involvement in dangerous research that may have caused the pandemic, referring to the lab leak hypothesis.

Back then, you couldn't say anything about masks or vaccines without facing censorship. It was considered a public health threat. Now, two years later, we're seeing news admitting that there were mistakes due to censorship. No one was interested in the truth or studying the situation. People were more focused on imposing restrictions and control. We need freedom to debate. It's concerning that a public organization can gather and accuse someone of lying on the internet without any consequences. Is this the solution? Is this the way forward?

The speaker criticizes Dr. Fauci, claiming he lacks knowledge about electron microscopy and medicine. They accuse him and other administrative figures of having personal agendas and making up rules. The speaker believes that the public cannot distinguish between good and bad scientists, which is a problem in the scientific community. They mention a request for Dr. Fauci to debate someone knowledgeable on the subject.

Humanity questions why experts like Fauci delve into unnecessary details. Fauci lacks understanding of electron microscopy and medicine, suggesting he is unfit for his role. Top officials are disconnected from the reality at the bottom, driven by personal agendas rather than public health. They create and change rules as they please, with Fauci even willing to lie to the public on TV.

The speaker says Dr. Fauci “contradicted himself constantly” during the COVID years. They claim Fauci admitted that he previously told people they “shouldn’t be walking around with masks on,” later explaining that the change was due to an effort to control the supply for health care professionals and that it “wasn’t based on any science.” The speaker then says Fauci later repeatedly told everyone to wear masks. They further claim the six-foot distancing rule was “crafted out of thin air” with “no basis in science,” adding that Fauci said the rule “sort of just appeared when he testified.” The speaker also claims guidance on shutting down schools and small businesses was “arbitrary and not based on any science.” The speaker argues that the American public should hear about what they describe as a government that was supposed to be limited and stay out of people’s lives but instead repeatedly came in with guidance, often under mandates. They say these mandates led to closing businesses, affecting people’s livelihoods, keeping children from being educated, and restricting people from expressing their faith through freedom of religion and gathering.

I was jailed for speaking out, do you agree? I don't want another lockdown. The speaker presents a book exposing research fraud behind vaccine mandates to a senator.

Criticism of science often targets me, but vaccination significantly reduces the risk of serious illness and transmission. While masks may provide limited benefit, they can offer reassurance during outbreaks. School closures have impacted children's mental health, but I didn't recommend shutting everything down; it was a difficult decision due to economic consequences. The origins of COVID-19 are debated, with some suggesting a lab leak. However, the NIH has not funded gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute. Claims about enhancing a bat coronavirus for human transmissibility are disputed; the focus is on research that alters transmissibility and pathogenicity. Misunderstandings persist, but I stand by the scientific approach.

I wouldn't label myself as anti-vaccine, but after watching your interviews and the guests you host, I'm disappointed. I believe you are anti-science and not pro-vaccine. Supporting vaccines like MMR or pertussis doesn't change the fact that denying the science behind the COVID vaccine makes you anti-vaccine. Rejecting COVID vaccine science equates to being anti-science.

It's okay to be afraid of COVID dominating your life, and everyone should be afraid of COVID. We won't be free of this pandemic until we listen to the acknowledged truth and the scientists. Science is truth. Questioning science impacts public health and prolongs economic hardship. Someone not wearing a mask is perceived as a threat, selfish, a COVID denier, and unvaccinated. Seek out scientists, listen to their advice, and trust the experts. Republicans have given their voters license to believe whatever they want. Don't listen to Trump, a nonmedical professional, but listen to Bill Gates. The science checks out, and eventually, the science catches up with you. Trust the vaccine and the medical experts. If you don't understand the science, let the experts speak. Don't take advice from your golf buddy or aunt; listen to the scientists and stop saying, "I need to do my own research." If we follow science, people can hug their grandchildren. This isn't about freedom, but freedom for your neighbors. You can hug each other if fully vaccinated. Listen to the scientists because the science works.

I came here to speak to this man, not your security. You have failed me. I've been a labor voter my entire life, and you have not held the government accountable. Thousands have died because you haven't asked the real questions. You have allowed children to wear masks in school despite a lack of evidence supporting it. You have failed this country. Get out of my pub; that man is not allowed in here. Thank you.

I don't speculate on the motivations of figures like Anthony Fauci or Bill Gates. Instead, I present the actions they've taken, which reveal a narrative of immoral and criminal behavior. This involves the misuse of their long-held positions in government to impose authoritarian controls that lacked scientific backing. It's now widely acknowledged that these measures were not based on science.

I cannot understand how anyone can recommend the mRNA vaccination and sleep well at night. They seem afraid to admit they were wrong. I want to give you a chance to address your colleagues, fellow pathologists, and medical professionals. My advice is to always question what so-called experts say. You don't need top scientists, you need experienced doctors who think critically. In the past, people died from the flu without it being turned into a pandemic or locking people away.

The speaker believes criticism of them is an attack on science. They stated vaccinated people don't need to worry about serious illness or transmission, but later acknowledged fully vaccinated people can transmit the infection. Masks were described as working "at the margins, maybe ten percent." School closures were considered an appropriate approach initially, but remote learning may have "forever damaged" kids, though the speaker doesn't believe it's "irreparably damaged anyone." The speaker claims they didn't recommend lockdowns, but recommended shutting the country down to the president, knowing it would have serious economic consequences. The speaker suggests the virus originated from the animal-human interface in wet markets, but that the place of origin was not within the market itself. Another intelligence arm concluded COVID began with a lab leak in China. The speaker denies the NIH funded gain of function research in the Wuhan Institute, while others claim NIH funded research that made a bat coronavirus more contagious. The speaker denies that this is gain of function.

Without your mask, you enjoyed the game next to others, while many were forced to stay home. Your science led to children being placed in plastic bubbles at school. In your own email, you stated that typical masks from drugstores are ineffective and do not recommend wearing them. Yet, healthy children across America were forced to wear masks and learn from home due to your guidance. Meanwhile, you and your associates benefited financially from big pharma. This committee should consider recommending your prosecution for crimes against humanity. You belong in prison, doctor Fauci.

The speaker claims the COVID vaccine is not a vaccine, but an experimental gene modification therapy that doesn't work, citing instances of vaccinated individuals contracting COVID. They state that masks are ineffective against the airborne virus and that social distancing guidelines were based on fabricated information from a 19th-century scientist. The speaker believes the regulations were not based on science but were lies, and that the government suppressed non-mRNA vaccines. They recount an incident of being forced to wear a mask by a police officer in an airport. The speaker concludes that the issue is not about regulation or etiquette, but about lies and "neo-fascism," which they believe is what younger people dislike.

I ask if you intend to substitute your judgment for that of professional scientists. I won’t substitute my judgment for science. The New York Times reported on fraudulent studies by NIH regarding amyloid plaques and Alzheimer's. Are the scientists who disagree with you considered bad? The corrupt ones, like those behind the fraudulent amyloid studies. Do you have a medical degree? No. Your failed presidential campaign has raised money. How much from HHS's issues? Zero. I want to enter emails about your fundraising into the record. Without objection. You previously stated that Black people should not follow the same vaccine schedule as whites. Can you explain? Studies show Black individuals may have stronger reactions to certain antigens, suggesting they need fewer. That’s dangerous. Your views could mislead parents. Do you think science is dangerous? These are peer-reviewed studies. I yield.

"Please wear a mask. There's no reason to be walking around with a mask. I often myself wear two masks. If you wear a mask, you can decrease the likelihood of transmitting or requiring COVID nineteen by fifty, sixty, seventy, maybe eighty percent. Said masks work at the margins maybe ten percent. Mask mandates did nothing. Forget the politics. Look at the data. There is just no evidence that they, masks, make any difference, full stop. The mask that you buy in a drugstore would be not particularly efficient in keeping out virus. Cloth coverings work. Two year old with asthma thrown off a flight. Mom is arrested in front of a young child. Isn't that theater? Isn't it just theater? There's no science behind it. Keep everybody masked."

Apologies for wearing my mask, but mandates are being reinstated. I love my mask as it shows my allegiance to the regime. I'm not concerned about studies showing mask mandates don't stop COVID spread or the link between masks and heart conditions. The loss in purchasing power and potential hyperinflation don't bother me unless it affects me directly. Admitting I was wrong is difficult, so I stick to my beliefs. I blame fascism, racism, and white supremacy for the world's problems, while denouncing those who question or fight back. I avoid deep research to save time. Wearing my mask allows me to avoid personal accountability. In the end, I wash my hands clean of any responsibility for communism.

No children died from COVID in 2020, so there is no need for them to be vaccinated. The government's role in this situation cannot be denied, and many Americans are outraged and angered by the lack of accountability. The worst thing to happen to our country and the world, in my opinion, is the ongoing vaccine mandates.

Fauci should be in prison for mishandling the pandemic. He caused countries in Africa to have no COVID deaths, while shutting down our economy and schools, leading to a lost generation's education. This also resulted in the largest wealth transfer ever. Additionally, a million people died.

Doctors who spent years in medicine told me that masks were not effective, yet they were being forced on people, including school kids. This had a devastating impact on their education. It surprises me that the NIH and CDC didn't do follow-up testing to determine the effectiveness and impact on kids. However, there were many studies during the height of COVID transmission that showed masks were working to prevent transmission. Because of this, it is unlikely that anyone would have proposed a clinical trial as there was no longer a question of equipoise.

Dr. Fauci was criticized for claiming he represents science. Many people see him as similar to Nazi doctor Joseph Mengele, not science. Some believe he will be remembered as the greatest mass killer in history once the truth about COVID is revealed.

I was accused of being part of a propaganda effort to censor those questioning the origin of the virus. I stand by my assertion that the virus is not a lab construct, which aligns with the intelligence community's conclusion. I cannot control how my work is used. It is wrong to censor and lie to the public, and I should have done better.