TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Bobby Kennedy is deeply knowledgeable about science, particularly regarding health issues like food dyes and vaccines. For over a decade, studies have shown certain food colorings are carcinogenic, yet they remain legal in the U.S. while banned in Europe. Kennedy's concerns about vaccines, including older polio versions with mercury, are often misunderstood. He emphasizes the importance of clearing viruses to prevent long COVID, highlighting the need for effective vaccines. The rising incidence of cancer in children is alarming, and there are now effective therapies available. The goal is to advance healthcare innovation and use it as a tool for foreign policy, promoting a healthier future.

In major metropolitan areas in the US, getting an appointment at an oncology clinic can take months. The long-term effects of new products like vaccines causing cancer are not immediately observable. Cancer takes time to develop, ranging from 2-3 years for blood cancers to 20-30 years for other types. However, clinicians have observed strange occurrences, such as colon cancer in young individuals without family history. The speaker believes that if the immune system is damaged, it may not be able to recognize or disable cancer cells, leading to their multiplication. COVID vaccines have been found to damage the immune system in some individuals, potentially increasing the risk of cancer in the long term. There have been reports of aggressive cancers appearing relatively soon after vaccination, leading to the term "turbocancers." The connection between cancer occurrence and vaccination is difficult to establish due to weak data. The pandemic lockdowns may have affected cancer diagnoses, but not the aggressive nature of the cancers observed.

We're seeing a surge in aggressive cancers, appearing at advanced stages, a phenomenon unlike anything seen before. Doctors are noticing a correlation between these cancers—breast, ovarian, pancreatic, colorectal, and prostate—and increased lipid peroxidation, seemingly linked to vaccinations. This isn't explained by delayed diagnosis or treatment. For example, a previously healthy 28-year-old male died five days after his second Pfizer vaccine; his heart was described as "mushy." This, among other cases, highlights the vaccine's danger. The lack of media coverage is alarming; this isn't just a medical crisis, but a crisis of science and democracy. I believe this vaccine should never have been authorized for mass use.

We need comprehensive double-blind, long-term placebo studies to properly evaluate vaccines. Vaccines work by tricking the immune system into thinking it has encountered a disease, which raises concerns given the rising autoimmune diseases we see today. Our immune systems appear confused, attacking our own bodies. While some may question whether environmental factors like air, food, or water are to blame, it's crucial to note that vaccines are specifically designed to manipulate the immune response. Unlike past vaccination schedules, children today receive numerous vaccines—up to 72 times—far exceeding what previous generations experienced. This trend is negatively impacting the health of our children, and we must address this issue urgently.

Many people are questioning the potential links between COVID and the COVID vaccine to rising cancer rates. While some cancers, like colon cancer, are increasing, especially among younger individuals, the reasons remain unclear. There are theories suggesting that changes in the US diet may be a contributing factor, but further research is needed to understand these trends fully.

The speaker claims SV40 in literature turns on cancer genes. They further claim the spike protein impairs tumor suppressor systems P53 and BRCA, promoting cancer and inhibiting the ability to fight it. The speaker suggests cancer rates are up, and the question is how much is due to vaccines. They state that repeated shots every six months increase the chances of getting loaded with synthetic genetic material that will cause harm, including heart disease, neurologic disease, blood clotting, immunologic problems, and cancer.

Cells and blood patterns reveal the truth, and the rise in unusual disease patterns is evident. As a pathologist, I report what I observe. Many in the medical community, including oncologists and radiologists, are noticing an alarming increase in aggressive cancers among younger patients, particularly after vaccinations. For instance, a radiologist reported two high-grade breast cancers in 31-year-old women shortly after their booster shots. A Florida oncology chair mentioned seeing five aggressive brain cancers in young patients within a month post-booster, a significant increase from the usual rate. Doctors from England and Ireland also confirm similar trends, with previously cancer-free patients relapsing after receiving boosters. This is a concerning reality that I wish were not happening.

I made it clear that my children were immunized with childhood vaccines. Public health failed to explain that COVID vaccines are different. Childhood vaccines, like for many diseases, provide immunity after one dose by giving children the disease without the deadly consequences. The COVID vaccine wasn't designed to prevent infection. Vaccine hesitancy has doubled since COVID, and we need to address these concerns. The mRNA vaccine should have been prioritized for those at high risk of severe disease, as the science and data indicated. We should have protected the elderly and those with comorbidities first. It went into young people before the elderly and nursing homes. We need to align public health actions with science and data. When we don't, we fracture trust with the American people.

I have three aunts who developed aggressive cancer after receiving the COVID vaccine, and they all passed away last year within months of each other. One had pancreatic cancer, which is known for its rapid progression. The other two aunts had different types of cancer, but the family is not discussing the details.

The speaker claims that this is not conspiracy theory and cites a BMJ publication by Retzaf Levy, which describes a process in vaccine development: vaccines were trialed under one formulation, but when the decision was made to deploy them globally, the process was changed and the product injected to the rest of the world. The speaker asserts that changing the process requires new trials, yet the EMA asked for an additional trial of 250 people after the process change, and that data was never delivered. This is described as a “bait and switch,” asserted as crucial for understanding why trial data is of zero consequence to what’s seen in the field, implying that real-world outcomes do not match trial data and that the numbers from trials are a caricature of field performance. The speaker claims Pfizer had early data indicating what would happen and acted on that by acquiring cancer companies: $43,000,000,000 into the acquisition of C Gen and $2,260,000,000 to acquire Trillium Therapeutics. Trillium is described as focused on blood cancers with the CD147 marker (CD Adaptor 147) on them, a marker claimed to be known to be involved in COVID. The implication is that Pfizer is building an investment portfolio in cancer companies that would benefit from the consequences the speaker alleges they caused. In summary, the vaccines on the market are said to be not the same formulation as what was tested in clinical trials, labeling this a “bait and switch” and a fraud, and asserting that vaccine effectiveness numbers are not reliable because the products differ from trial formulations and because those numbers decay over time. The speaker alleges significant DNA contamination, stating that 10 out of 11 studies have found this, with the remaining studies allegedly constrained by financial conflicts. The claim is that consensus among real studies supports DNA contamination, with several studies through peer review, which the speaker notes is difficult for those papers to pass through peer review. It is claimed that five peer-reviewed studies not originally examining contamination found DNA in blood and tissue upon sleuthing. The speaker asserts that cancer is on the rise and that several papers report cancer post-vaccination, including neoplasms at the site of injection. The claim is that this situation cannot be dismissed as coincidence and is described as “liability free” and often mandated. The speaker posits that this may be the largest carcinogenic hit to the human population, with vaccines on childhood schedules and given to pregnant women, stating that “this has gone absolutely off the rails.”

The speaker claims messenger RNA vaccines with the spike protein can induce cancer in multiple ways. They allege the presence of oncogene stimulants, specifically SV40 in the Pfizer vaccine, confirmed by multiple researchers. A paper from Wurzburg purportedly confirms this and shows the vaccines convert cells to cancer. The speaker asserts the spike protein and mRNA vaccines bind to major suppressor genes like P53, BRCA, and MSH, which normally suppress cancer. Mutations in these genes can lead to earlier onset of cancer. The speaker suggests these vaccines could cause the equivalent of mutations in these genes, leading to an explosion of colorectal cancers. They advocate for an immediate ban on these vaccines and accountability for those who oppose it.

I recently met someone whose 18-year-old daughter developed cancer after receiving the Pfizer vaccine. I've heard from many parents who lost children to these injections, some experiencing immediate and horrific deaths. They repeatedly share their stories with lawmakers, highlighting a significant crime that must end. The FDA was aware of the potential cancer risks associated with these vaccines, as outlined in guidance documents from 2013 and 2015. These documents instructed manufacturers to study risks like cancer, fertility issues, and cardiovascular problems, and deemed it unethical to test on healthy volunteers. Yet, by 2020, these concerns were seemingly overlooked. This raises serious suspicions about the intentions behind the vaccine rollout, suggesting a premeditated crime where regulators and the military may have colluded with pharmaceutical companies.

Since the rollout of COVID-19 vaccines, there's been a notable rise in young individuals, particularly women in their teens and twenties, presenting with stage 4 cancers, such as breast and colon cancer, without any family history or genetic anomalies. Many of these young patients were vaccinated due to mandates for education or employment. This trend is unprecedented, with cancers growing and metastasizing rapidly, often showing resistance to conventional treatments like chemotherapy and radiation. The only common factor among these cases is the COVID-19 vaccination, indicating a significant shift in cancer patterns since the vaccines became available in 2021.

The majority of Canadian doctors are vaccinated, with some experiencing sudden deaths from heart issues, blood clots, strokes, and aggressive cancers. These cancers, dubbed "turbo cancer" on social media, are unusually fast-growing and deadly, affecting young individuals in their twenties and thirties. The rapid progression and severity of these cancers are unlike anything previously seen by the speaker, who has diagnosed over 20,000 cancer patients in their career.

Australia has administered over 60 million vaccine doses to over 20 million people. Despite this, governmental health authorities have chosen not to monitor new or emerging cancer trends, and have failed to make post-vaccination cancer trend data publicly available, which is a critical oversight. Given the massive contamination levels of rogue residual DNA in the Australian vials, we must expect an ongoing rise in cancers and other genetic disorders in Australia. This is a potential long-term health crisis. This matter must be taken seriously. We must advocate for immediate public health responses and monitoring of these trends. Without action, Australians are vulnerable to preventable diseases that may devastate families and strain our healthcare system. These gene-based vaccines should never have been considered. The technology had never been proven to be effective in preventing coronavirus infections and was unsafe long before 2021.

Speaker 0: Let's start with I had predicted, unfortunately, and I hate that I am right. I predicted before the vaccines were ever launched to the public that they would have a profound impact on the immune system. And as a result of that alone, would likely cause increased cancer rates just because of their immunological impact. So let's start, if you would, just by talking a little bit about what you are seeing in the data, in the numbers with regard to cancers, what kinds of cancers, those sorts of things. And then maybe we'll get into the weeds, you and I, about perhaps some of the pathology of that, why that might be, some theories for why we're seeing these numbers. Speaker 1: You know, Doctor. Kelly, I've been tracking these turbo cancers as they're being called, these very aggressive cancers that are showing up in young COVID vaccinated people. The youngest case I've reported is a 12 year old boy who had a Moderna vaccine and came down with, end stage brain cancer that killed him in less than a year. I'm seeing it in teenagers in university and college students who are mandated to take COVID vaccines. People in their twenties, thirties, forties, fifties are coming down with stage four cancers. These cancers are presenting at a late stage, stage three, but usually stage four. These are lymphomas, leukemias, these are breast cancers, colon cancers, lung cancers, hepatobiliary cancers, testicular cancers in young men, ovarian cancers in women, kidney cancers, renal cell cancers, melanomas, skin cancers, and sarcomas as well. So these are the types of cancers that are showing up in a younger cohort than oncologists expect. They're showing up at a late stage. The tumors can grow very large. So some of these tumors are described as football sized, even watermelon sized, you know, these are ten, fifteen centimeter tumors, and they're very aggressive and and they really they spread very rapidly. Even when the surgeons are trying to get at them, trying to surgically excise them so that they could control the tumor, what they usually find after surgery is that the tumor has already spread. It's already spread to the lymph nodes, it's already spread to the lungs or the bones, very aggressive cancers, and really related to the COVID-nineteen vaccine specifically, and mRNA vaccines, the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines. Speaker 0: One of the things, me just step back for a second, because one of the things that might not be known to our audience is that all cancers are not created equal with regard to the population that they hit. You know, for example, we not uncommonly and tragically see certain blood cancers in children leukemias, for example. It wouldn't be uncommon, to to see a brain tumor, brain cancers sometimes in young children. It would be extraordinarily uncommon to see a colon cancer in somebody before the fourth or fifth decade. Very uncommon to see a lung cancer before the fourth or fifth decade. Those sorts of things, extremely uncommon to see. So some of these cancers that we are seeing, and I think you're getting at that, things like these colon cancers, we are now seeing colon cancers in people in their late teens, twenties, and thirties. And again, as you said, very aggressive colon cancers. So it's not just that cancers per se, but it's seeing cancers in in groups of people in whom they'd never seen before. So let's in terms of just to put some magnitude on it. In terms of give us some sense of the magnitude versus what we would have considered to be the baseline numbers. Speaker 1: You know, it's very hard to get a sense of this because it's almost impossible to get good cancer data from from the governments. Know, Ed Dowd has talked about this, the difficulty of getting good data. You know, I've tried to get cancer data here in Canada from Statistics Canada, from the Canadian Cancer Society, and they are not reporting any data from 2021 or 2022. It seems they're holding this data back. And so I'm left with anecdotal evidence. When Ed Dowd, you know, he'll report from US insurance data that disability rates, in the working population, let's say, eighteen to sixty four, who abided by the COVID vaccine mandates, disability rates are 500% higher compared to the working population who dropped out of the workforce and didn't want to get the vaccines. Well, a big portion of those disabilities are these cancers, are these cancer diagnoses. And so, you know, I'm seeing an explosion of these cancers. I'm seeing it in doctors. I'm seeing it in nurses. I'm seeing it in other vaccine mandated professions. So all types of healthcare workers, I'm seeing it in teachers, I'm seeing it in police officers, firefighters, the military. You know, you see it in flight attendants, for example, you know, you had these airlines that wanted to have 100% vaccinated workforce. So really anywhere where there were very strict COVID vaccine mandates, that's where I'm seeing these explosions of these very aggressive cancers. And I can tell you, this year, '23, seems to be much worse. There's many more cases of these turbo cancers than in 2022 or 2021. The trend is upwards. The numbers are on the rise. You can see this on websites like GoFundMe. If you go on GoFundMe and you put stage four cancer and you can pick whatever cancer you want, you could put, you know, breast cancer, you could put lung cancer, colon cancer. Not only are you seeing the shocking ages, young ages of these individuals who are reporting their cancers and their fundraising because, you know, they lose their jobs when they're undergoing chemotherapy, for example, by you see just how many people are suffering are coming down from these cancers, especially in 2023. It's just unbelievable. It's a tsunami of cancer diagnosis.

3.1 million Canadian children have received at least one COVID-19 vaccine, increasing their long-term cancer risk. Vaccinated kids are developing turbo cancers like leukemias and brain tumors, previously seen in adults. This elevated cancer risk will affect them for life.

There have been reports suggesting a significant increase in cancer rates since the vaccination rollout, with many anecdotal cases emerging globally. The immune system plays a crucial role in identifying and eliminating early cancer cells. However, the vaccination may have impacted immune function, potentially allowing cancers to grow unchecked. The extent of this issue remains unclear, but there are concerns that it could lead to a surge in cancer and other conditions linked to the vaccination program. Notably, some healthcare professionals, like Dr. Ryan Cole in Idaho, have reported increased cancer activity, raising alarms about the lack of thorough studies typically associated with vaccine development, which usually spans 5 to 10 years. This situation is unprecedented and warrants serious attention.

It is possible to understand what is happening with vaccines without a statistics degree. VAERS was in place during the rollout of many vaccines, including measles, rubella, and COVID. One speaker had not heard federal officials reference VAERS. The idea with VAERS seems to be that people are complaining and should be quiet. The technology in these shots was brand new and never deployed before at scale, and the trials were a joke. It is hard to get up-to-date cancer numbers. While one speaker does not see a lot of cancer in their practice, friends at MD Anderson say they have never seen anything like the young people coming in with very advanced tumors. That is what we have to be worried about now.

I made it clear that my children received childhood immunizations. The issue is we failed to communicate that COVID vaccines differ significantly from childhood vaccines, which typically provide lasting immunity after one dose. The COVID vaccine was not designed to prevent infection. Vaccine hesitancy has doubled since COVID, and we must address this. The mRNA vaccines should have prioritized individuals at high risk for severe disease, aligning with the scientific data. We should have protected the elderly and those in nursing homes first. Prioritizing young people in hospitals before the elderly was not following the science. Public health actions must align with scientific data to maintain the trust of the American people.

I've lost all my friends during my medical training because they thought I was crazy. In the past year, I've witnessed alarming health issues among my colleagues. Out of 30 physicians at my clinic, two were diagnosed with aggressive cancer, and one died. It's become common to hear about physicians dying suddenly. Recently, a healthy family practice resident in his thirties died from advanced gastric cancer, leaving behind an unborn child. This situation highlights the risks healthcare providers face when they receive these experimental vaccines, which they promote to their patients while potentially suffering serious health consequences themselves.

The speaker states they are still being persecuted for raising concerns about harm from vaccines. They testified at the National Citizens Inquiry in Edmonton about vaccinated kids now getting cancer, which they believe will be denied for years despite seeing it in their patients. They claim to have discussed the "died suddenly" phenomenon and "turbo cancer" – aggressive cancers developing after COVID-19 vaccines – for two years, resulting in being banned from Twitter. The speaker says they have shifted focus to solutions and treating vaccine injuries, as the destructiveness of the "jabs" is now widely understood, with many knowing someone who has experienced heart attacks, strokes, blood clots, autoimmune diseases, neurological issues, or cancer. They claim there has been a huge explosion of cancer, and they are currently running the largest ivermectin cancer clinic in the world with over a thousand patients.

Traveling the country, the speaker has heard anecdotes from physicians about unusual cancer cases following the rollout of boosters. In Florida, one physician reported seeing five kidney cancers in young patients in one month, whereas they usually see one per decade. A chief of oncology reported seeing five astrocytoma brain cancers in young patients after the booster rollout, when they usually see one per year. Another physician reported their 21-year-old son developed salivary gland cancer after getting a booster. The speaker claims these are not normal cancers, and they've heard of patients with stable cancer or who have been cancer-free for years developing stage four disease after getting vaccinated. Doctors in France and the UK have allegedly confirmed similar observations, and a family doctor from Ireland reported seeing the "weirdest cancers" after the shot rollout. The speaker concludes that these anecdotes suggest something is wrong.

I'm skeptical about the COVID vaccine, especially the mRNA vaccines. I recently spoke with a top cancer expert in Britain who was very critical of the long-term effects of the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines. According to this expert, we may see a significant increase in cancer cases as a result of these vaccines. While I believe the vaccines saved lives, I question whether we had enough time to fully understand the potential long-term consequences.