reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Speaker alleges the Tennessee Department of Children's Services is taking undocumented kids and putting them in state's custody and the state foster care system. They are assisting these kids into getting a court order from the juvenile court that says that they're abandoned, then they get an order of abandonment and a special circumstances juvenile immigration status. They warn 'how clever and how smart cartel immigration is.' The speaker says they 'finally got my hands on a court order' showing 'how they did this right here in Davidson County.' They claim to have told state legislators, congresspeople it's 'totally illegal,' and cite phone conversations stating that 'DCS Commissioner Quinn is well aware of it and she is central to it' because she has told providers to report to her if they have any issues with undocumented kids. Huge. It is trafficking. I mean,

This bill is described as a pipeline to the criminal justice system for parents. The speaker opposes criminalizing parents for wanting to love their children.

In this video, a state legislator expresses concern about the lack of protection for parents. They highlight the assault on charter schools, which limits parents' choices in education, especially for children of color. The legislator also mentions government interference in medical care decisions. They argue that if parents don't support the government's ideology, they may have their children taken away. While the current focus is on divorce proceedings, the legislator believes this issue will expand beyond that. They urge parents who love their children to leave California, as they feel the state is becoming oppressive and reminiscent of "The Handmaid's Tale." The legislator plans to move to another state that values freedom.

According to the speaker, Gavin Newsom signed a document that makes it a crime to ask a voter for identification. The speaker believes this action indicates a desire to cheat on elections. The speaker claims that while identification is required for other activities, it is now virtually a crime to ask for it when voting, which the speaker considers the most important act. The speaker asserts the only reason for this is to enable election cheating and insists this should not be allowed to happen.

The speaker claims the bill pays "lip service" to 16 and 17-year-old victims of sex crimes by watering down penalties. They assert the Democratic caucus is on the "wrong side" of the issue, influenced by an "extremist wing" that normalizes sex with minors. The speaker alleges SB 145 (2020) allows predators to molest children as young as 14 without mandatory sex offender registration and that SB 357 legalized loitering for sex trafficking under the guise of LGBT rights. As a "gay Republican," the speaker finds it offensive to use the gay community as "window dressing for sex trafficking." The speaker argues the bill removes prosecutors' ability to punish those who purchase sex from 16 and 17-year-olds and accuses the bill's supporters of trying to deceive California voters. The speaker also objects to the amendment that removes a legislator's name from the bill. They believe the bill will fail to protect 16 and 17-year-olds from sexual violence and vows to work against it.

The speaker questions the ACLU's stance on 85,000 missing children and suggests that the sponsors of these children are not real. They claim that the sponsors are involved in a racket and are not answering the phone. The speaker believes that a large number of these sponsors are involved in sex trafficking and accuses the current administration of supporting this through their policies. They also mention a partnership with cartels for human trafficking.

HB 251312 is described as the worst bill ever proposed, defining misgendering and deadnaming as coercive control, which could lead to children being taken from parents who don't affirm their trans identity. The bill allegedly allows the state to intervene if someone doesn't affirm another's delusion. The speaker, who identifies as autistic, expresses heartbreak that the transgender ideology is targeting autistic people, claiming to have seen a post of an autistic woman whose breasts were cut off. The speaker believes half the victims of transgender ideology are autistic and that this bill will steal autistic children to castrate and mutilate them, taking away their bodies and families. The speaker says autistic people are targeted due to their vulnerability and are exploited for money and votes to make them dependent on big pharma. The speaker believes the real reason autistic people struggle is due to authoritarian government repression in schools, followed by the trans community telling them they struggle because they're trans.

The speakers question why anyone would vote for Democrats, citing open borders, gender-affirming care, and lenient stances on child trafficking as reasons. One speaker claims Democrats in California don't prioritize punishing child traffickers. Another speaker asserts that California is attempting to lower the age of consent to 14 and is decriminalizing the sale of sex. They believe a 16 or 17-year-old should not have to prove force, fraud, or coercion in sex trafficking cases for perpetrators to be jailed. They describe this as a "slippery slope" and question how anyone can still vote for the Democratic party.

The government is implementing laws and rulings indicating they believe children belong to the government, not their parents. These policies are expected at the state, local, and federal levels under a Harris-Waltz administration. Many across the country now recognize the "idiocy" in California's stance. The district must do the right thing, even if the state does not. The government should stand up for parental rights, the safeguarding of children, and women's rights.

California bill AB 495 allows any adult to gain guardianship of a child without parental consent or due process by filling out a form. The bill, which has passed the assembly and is moving through appropriations, is purportedly intended to protect children of parents facing deportation. However, the bill's language is broad enough to allow any adult in California to take guardianship of any child. The form requires the applicant to state they have advised the parent or legal guardian, or that they are unable to contact the parent. There is no verification of deportation status or the adult's safety. The speaker claims this amounts to state-sanctioned child trafficking.

Speaker 0 asserts that states are taking children and giving them to others for money from the federal government, describing it as a nationwide, government-subsidized child trafficking ring—the largest and most pervasive in history by money and numbers. Speaker 1 adds that children are seized unnecessarily from their families due to the federal Adoption and Safe Families Act, enacted in 1997 by Bill and Hillary Clinton, which, according to the speakers, “literally steals money from the Social Security Fund and gives this money to the states in order to incentivize them to kidnap babies.” Speaker 0 elaborates that in order to receive adoption incentives or bonuses, local CPS must have more children, i.e., more “merchandise to sell.” Speaker 1 and Speaker 0 together claim that each child, when totaled, is worth approximately $1,000,000 to the state, challenging the official figure of $60-80 billion per year as the size of the industry and claiming that the federal government takes about $80,000,000,000 annually and distributes it to all 50 states to “kidnap children.” Speaker 1 states that parents are victimized by a system that profits from holding children longer and offering bonuses for not returning children to their parents. Speaker 0 cites statistics alleging that eighty-three percent of all children taken by CPS are for unsubstantiated allegations, implying that many removals should not have happened in the first place. Speaker 1 notes that case workers and social workers are often guilty of fraud, with allegations that they withhold and destroy evidence.

Proposition 1 on the New York ballot is presented as an abortion bill, but the speaker claims it doesn't mention abortion. Instead, the speaker asserts it grants voting rights to illegal citizens in local elections. The speaker alleges the bill removes parental rights by requiring parents to assist children in transitioning genders or face neglect charges. The speaker also claims the bill allows men to participate in women's sports and use women's bathrooms. The speaker urges listeners to read the three-page bill and says abortions have never been under attack in New York. The speaker accuses proponents of lying to manipulate voters.

California Governor Gavin Newsom's law requires schools to hide a child's gender dysphoria from parents, which Newsom claims protects the child-parent relationship. However, this law prevents schools from informing parents when their children believe they were born into the wrong body, potentially leading to puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and surgery. Newsom's actions are attributed to weak leadership and caving into radical activist pressure. Newsom has increased homelessness by 40% and is allegedly enabling drug addiction, mental illness, and sexual assault. His government is accused of affirming mental illness and psychiatric disorders rather than treating them. A movement is organizing to fight back against these policies. The speaker urges people to sign up and subscribe to Public to combat California's disinformation and fight back against Newsom's policies. Newsom is accused of lying and weaponizing the government to attack the child-parent relationship.

If you live in California, pull your kids out of public school because it's unfixable and will worsen. In one district, dozens of girls reported being assaulted on campus. The board of education members belong to Project Indivisible, so change is unlikely. The speaker worked for the district for two years and witnessed unbelievable things. After speaking out at board and city council meetings and meeting with the district office, the speaker was stalked, harassed, and chased off the road. The speaker advises, "These are not seeing people you're dealing with. Pull your kids out."

Children arriving at the border with questionable guardians are not verified. Taxpayers fund their travel and necessities, potentially aiding traffickers. Officials admit to knowingly sending children into sex trafficking or sweatshops. The lack of DNA testing raises concerns about child safety.

AB 495 would expand affidavits by redefining the term relative to include nonrelative family members, hundreds or thousands of people. The affidavit would allow an adult with whom the child resides to exercise the parent’s rights over the child’s education and medical care. It is intended to be temporary and not supersede the parent’s decisions. The form requires only the child’s name and birthday, and the adult’s alleged name and address, with no identification and no requirement to contact the parent. The back states that a person relying on the affidavit has no obligation to make any further inquiry or investigation. A nonrelative is defined as anyone with a familial or mentoring relationship, such as teachers, medical professionals, clergy, neighbors, and friends. The transcript warns of scenarios where a creepy neighbor could use this to enroll or obtain care, giving kidnappers a leg up and a head start.

According to the speaker, anyone living in Washington state should leave immediately because the state has gone "absolutely insane." The speaker claims that Washington state passed a medical bill, signed by the governor, that allows the state to do whatever they want to individuals during a medical emergency. The speaker recalls that Washington previously discussed building internment camps for unvaccinated people. The speaker alleges that the state can dictate what happens to every individual based on "scientific experts" during a statewide emergency declared by the governor. The speaker asserts that individuals will be forced to take whatever "scientific experts" say they have to take. The speaker states they will not have their kids in that state and will not live in that state.

The California legislature has passed four bills aimed at removing children from their homes and placing them in government systems, where everyone except parents will have knowledge about their personal struggles. This policy is about parental notification, not outing. Meanwhile, the attorney general is suing Chino Valley Unified School District, but the temporary order issued recently is just to maintain the current situation until a final decision is made. This decision will determine if the policies are legal, constitutional, and necessary for protecting children.

Speaker 0 asserts: I’m not suicidal. Any creator, politician, or celebrity who tries to make a film or documentary on CPS has wound up dead, including a senator. The November film will be their hardest hitting, and they will “rip the veil off” to the point where CPS shows up at your door. Our government is running the world’s largest child trafficking network. They emphasize they would never kill themselves, do drugs, or put themselves in dangerous environments; if anything happens to them, it is the United States government. They watched the first take of the film and say, “they’re gonna kill me.” They urge a trip down memory lane to discuss Pizzagate, stating this is where it all starts. Speaker 1 begins by saying the Pizzagate story has outrageous connections and promising brand-new whistleblower information that will blow minds. They provide an overview: back to Bill and Hillary Clinton, whom many believe to be child pedophiles. They say there’s never been direct evidence, but in 02/2016 WikiLeaks published Hillary Clinton emails with John Podesta showing coded language about a child trafficking ring centered in a Washington, DC pizza restaurant basement at Comet Ping Pong. Edgar Maddison Welch went to the restaurant with firearms to “liberate the children,” but no one was hurt; it was later said there wasn’t a basement, so the scandal was dismissed, though there’s more to the story. The transcript then ties Hillary Clinton to Laura Silsbee, who was involved in trafficking, and outlines a chain: Hillary Clinton and Laura Silsbee exchanged documents detailing logistics of trafficking children from Haiti to Boise, Idaho. Laura Silsbee had previously kidnapped several dozen children from Haiti and attempted to cross into the Dominican Republic; she was caught and the children were returned to their families. Shawnee M. King is cited for reporting on Silsbee’s case. Jorge Puello, an attorney for Silsbee’s group, was suspected of leading an international trafficking ring; Puello was arrested in investigations by ICE and Homeland Security; his wife faced charges of sexual exploitation of minors and women. The narrative claims Hillary Clinton and Laura Silsbee were connected; Bill and Hillary Clinton allegedly helped negotiate the release of Laura Silsbee and her accomplices after their imprisonment in Haiti. Speaker 1 then ties the connections to CPS: the number-one source of child trafficking is the U.S. CPS system, and the number-one gateway to sex trafficking in America is the foster care system. The foster care system allegedly lost over 100,000 children in the last twenty years, raised questions about where they went, and claims millions of children are abused in foster care by financially compensated foster parents and social workers. The Adoptive Safe Families Act (ASFA), championed by Hillary Clinton and signed by Bill Clinton in 1997, supposedly created and financed CPS/foster care by diverting Social Security funds to 50 states, giving a financial incentive to “kidnap” children. It is claimed that CPS targets poor and minority children and single-parent families, and that the system now functions as a government-subsidized child-trafficking ring. Speaker 1 lists correlations: CPS is a tool used to target conservatives; CPS offices get paid per child kidnapped; 83% of removals lack proof of abuse. The claim is that Hillary Clinton created the system and that Laura Silsbee, a friend of Clinton, is involved in Idaho’s CPS network. Laura Silsbee allegedly works with Idaho Department of Health and Welfare (IDHW) and is a registered foster care parent in Idaho, receiving monthly payments for children in her custody, as shown by whistleblower-provided screenshots. Idaho’s Attorney General Raul Labrador opened an investigation into IDHW financial misappropriations, but Idaho’s Department director Dave Jepison resigned and disappeared, and Judge Lynn Norton allegedly issued an order halting the AG’s investigation. The Idaho Department of Health and Welfare allegedly dominates Idaho’s budget, and Laura Silsbee’s role with IDHW is framed as proof of a nationwide system. The narrative concludes by warning Idahoans to beware of Laura Silsbee (aka Laura Gaylor), Judge Norton, and supporters of IDHW, asserting that the system extends to all 50 states, including Arizona, Texas, and Florida, which are described as among the worst offenders in CPS corruption.

The speaker expresses concern about increased regulations on homeschooling. They mention a lack of transparency in the discussion, citing Attorney General Nessel's desire for a list of homeschool parents for unwarranted home entry. The speaker questions the effectiveness of a mere registration in preventing abuse.

In my 11 years in the state legislature, I've realized that we need to protect parents, not just children. Charter schools are under attack, limiting parents' choices and negatively impacting children of color. Government interference has also come between parents, children, and doctors in medical care. Now, if parents don't align with the government's ideology, they risk losing their children. While currently limited to divorce proceedings, this won't stop there. I used to encourage people to fight, but now I urge parents who love their children to leave California. The state is becoming oppressive, resembling The Handmaid's Tale. As someone born and raised here, it breaks my heart, but I believe in freedom and will move elsewhere after leaving the legislature.

Speaker 0 conveys a series of grave allegations about the abuse and trafficking of children. They state that children are not only kidnapped and, in some cases, bred by families as a cash crop, but that there are people in the United States who breed children in order to sell them. The claim continues that when these children are sold, they come without birth certificates, which, according to the speaker, makes it easier to kill them without anyone asking where they are. In addition to this, Speaker 0 asserts that children are being imported by the plane load, again noting that these children have no documentation. Beyond child slavery or child sex abuse, the speaker asserts that there is child torture, described as involving adrenalized blood. They mention “the whole blood drinking ceremony of the satanic world,” and reference ritual ceremonies and ritual murder, as well as incidental murder. The speaker also raises a working assumption about the survivability of these children, asking how long they survive, and states that, from witnesses they have spoken to, the answer is two years. These points are presented as direct claims about widespread abuse, trafficking, and ritual violence directed at children, with a specific assertion that some of these children lack birth certificates and travel with no documentation, facilitating harm and concealment. The overall narrative emphasizes a combination of kidnapping, forced breeding for profit, illegal importation, lack of documentation, and extreme forms of torture and ritualistic violence, culminating in the asserted conclusion that the observed survival time for these children is two years, according to the witnesses referenced by the speaker.

California's Bill AB665 is causing confusion, so let's clarify. Currently, 12-year-olds in California can consent to mental health treatment without parental knowledge or consent. However, there are safeguards in place to prevent impulsive decisions. The bill aims to remove these safeguards, allowing 12-year-olds to decide if they want to leave home and enter residential shelter services under state care. The bill also includes various professionals who can facilitate this transition. It has passed the Senate Judiciary Committee and will now go to the Senate floor before returning to the assembly for a final vote. To oppose the bill, contact your state senator and assembly member for a meeting or town hall discussion.

In California and New York, it is illegal to ask for or show ID when people vote. According to the speakers, there is no logical reason for this law other than to facilitate election fraud. To commit fraud, one would eliminate the need for ID and allow mail-in ballots.

California Governor Gavin Newsom signed a law preventing schools from informing parents if their children are on a medical pathway for gender transition. This law puts children at risk of irreversible medical treatments without parental consent. Similar actions in Britain have led to a ban on puberty blockers due to their harmful effects. Children and parents have the right to know about any potential gender dysphoria diagnosis. Schools should not promote the idea of being born in the wrong body. Action is needed to overturn this dangerous law in California to protect children and their parents.