TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

This video discusses the history of coronavirus research, highlighting its origins in 1965 and the development of spike protein vaccines by Pfizer in 1990. The speaker emphasizes the long-standing manipulation of pathogens for various purposes and questions the ethical implications of these actions. The conversation urges listeners to consider the implications of such research on humanity's future.

In this video, James O'Keefe confronts the vice president of Pfizer, Josh, about whether Jordan Walker still works for the company. Josh avoids answering the question and instead talks about the virus mutating. O'Keefe continues to press him for a direct answer, but Josh remains silent. O'Keefe accuses Pfizer of prioritizing profits over public health, quoting Josh as saying COVID is a "cash cow" for the company. A whistleblower, Debbie Bernal, also speaks up, questioning Jordan Walker's employment at Pfizer and criticizing the school board for not addressing the issue. The school board members, including Josh, dismiss the questions and refuse to comment. O'Keefe tries to confront them further, but they ignore him and drive away.

Pfizer did not disclose SV40 DNA in COVID vaccine to regulators, causing concern among Health Canada officials. The presence of SV40 DNA was confirmed by Pfizer but not shared with FDA, EMA, or HC initially. Despite claims that the DNA fragment is inactive and below regulatory limits, concerns remain about potential risks. Health Canada is working with international partners to address the issue for future vaccine strains. The focus seems to be on vaccine acceptance rather than addressing health risks associated with DNA contamination. Pfizer has not responded to requests for comment.

Pfizer is reportedly considering mutating the COVID virus to develop new vaccines, a topic discussed internally but not disclosed to the public. The process involves infecting monkeys with the virus to create mutations, which raises ethical concerns. While some argue this resembles gain-of-function research, Pfizer claims it is a different approach called directed evolution. The goal is to anticipate new variants and create vaccines in advance, potentially turning COVID into a profitable venture for the company. Concerns about the moral implications of such actions and the influence of government officials in the pharmaceutical industry were also raised, suggesting a troubling relationship between regulators and companies like Pfizer. The situation remains controversial, with ongoing discussions about transparency and public health risks.

Every day, just the 1% of the cells of your DNA that gets replicated stretches from here to the sun four times. If you're to line it up end by end, that's very hard to conceptualize. But it should give you a little bit of humility before you go and start monkeying with it with these vaccines that can actually alter your DNA. And that's what I'm gonna show you. Is that the vaccines had a DNA contamination in them that didn't tell you about that could in fact alter your genome. Alright? These people are vibe coding your genome. And this is a major attack surface to the human gene pool because if this thing starts to alter the lifespan of people, it's going to part you with your Bitcoin. You're gonna end up spending money in a fiat system that has no controls, has no liability, and ends up oftentimes inducing mandates to get what it wants done. Many people had have peer have gone and replicated this work. It happened on Twitter. It did not happen very quickly in the peer review system. The peer review system kinda kicked it out. Some of these papers have now been peer reviewed, but it took years for them to come to this conclusion. Now, the FDA, the EMA and the TGA have all admitted that this mistake has happened. How did it happen? There's a big bait and switch. Pfizer actually ran the trial of 22,000 people on the process on the left and after they got to the trial, they then switched to the process on the right and didn't retrial the drug. And in doing so, they left a tremendous amount of excess DNA behind in the product. So all of the vaccine efficiency numbers you've heard in the news are flawed. They're not real because that's not what actually went into the trial. What went to the public was actually something that came out of this process too. It's published now in the BMJ that this fraud happened and no one has yet been prosecuted for it. So what did they leave in there? What they left in there was something we know from the polio scandal. If you're not familiar with the polio scandal, that polio vaccines were also contaminated with something known as SV40 and it created a massive cancer wave. Now the whole virus isn't in these vaccines, but there is a very curious part of this called the SV40 region that Pfizer intentionally removed from the disclosure that they gave to the FDA. So the FDA has admitted that this SV40 material is in there. They did not spell this out to the regulators. The regulators did not find them and they're actually running cover for them saying this DNA is too little consequence to matter, it's too small, and it's not functional. But we know it's functional because Dean et al has published that this piece of DNA drives DNA straight to the nucleus. It gets used in gene therapy vectors.

Pfizer is being accused of colluding with the US government and the Department of Defense in what is considered a war crime. However, the speaker believes that putting all the blame on pharmaceutical companies is a deliberate tactic. They argue that the truth will eventually be revealed, leading to repercussions. To divert attention, the speaker suggests that Pfizer will be portrayed as a corrupt capitalist company that bought off politicians and government officials. Pfizer will likely plead guilty to minor crimes through shell companies, paying fines that the government will distribute to themselves. The speaker emphasizes that this strategy protects those involved and shifts focus away from the actual crime committed.

A senior scientist at Pfizer in Kyiv reveals a disturbing COVID-19 vaccine trial for children. Children are dying, and subjects are unaware they are part of an experiment. Despite high mortality rates and hospitalizations, the trials continue without revision. The Ministry of Health and President Zelensky are involved, and the scientist is horrified by the unethical practices. The next phase is set to begin soon, and the scientist plans to demand the trials be stopped. Ukraine is becoming a test field for illegal medical trials.

This is not conspiracy theory. This has been published in the BMJ by Retzaf Levy, and they go through this process: one where they ran these vaccines in the trial and how they changed that when they decided to go and inject the rest of the world. This is traditionally a mortal sin in vaccine manufacturing or in any sort of biologic manufacturing. The process is the product. You change the process, you have to go through trials again. And the EMA even asked them to do that, although they failed to. They asked for another trial of 250 people once they changed the process and that data was never delivered. So this bait and switch is very important for you to understand why the trial data is of absolute zero consequence to what we're actually seeing in the field. Those numbers are a caricature of what they're actually doing with these injections. They know something. Pfizer very early on they had the data on this from their trial, they knew this was going to happen and they quickly went out and acquired cancer companies. They put $43,000,000,000 into the acquisition of C Gen and they put $2,260,000,000 to acquire Trillium Therapeutics. Trillium was focused on blood cancers that have a CD one forty seven marker on them. Okay? That is one of the markers that is known to be involved in COVID. So, they have a very interesting window on those malignancies and, they're buying up the cancer companies that are probably gonna play the biggest role in benefiting from the mess that they've created. So, in summary, the Pfizer vaccines on the market are not the same formulation as what was tested in the clinical trials. This is a big bait and switch and it's a fraud. So you can't believe anything they're saying about the vaccine efficiency, which we have seen even those numbers decay over time. This is probably why. They're not really what they trialed. They gave you something different. There is significant DNA contamination that's found. Like, 10 out of 11 studies have found this, and the ones that haven't found it have some financial conflicts. So, I think the consensus is out. 10 out of 10 out of 10 of the real studies, are finding this. Several are through peer review, which have not been easy to get through peer review. The peer review journals do not like these papers. They get beat around in peer review for months to years, but they're making their way out now. There is also significant DNA contamination now found in five peer reviewed studies that were not looking at this. They were looking at people's blood and tissue and it was accidentally in there. Other people had to go sleuth it out. We've got cancer on the rise and there's several papers that report cancer post vaccination. Like, right at the site of injection, they'll see neoplasms. Alright? There is there's something going on here. This can't be ignored saying it's a coincidence anymore. Now this is these are liability free and they're often mandated. Okay? This may be the largest carcinogenic hit ever to the human population. And we have these on childhood schedules. We're giving these to pregnant women. This has gone absolutely off the rails.

Pfizer was not initially ready for Operation Warp Speed. Pfizer allegedly went to their genetic department and found SV40, using it to design their COVID jab. They then allegedly instructed scientists to remove evidence of SV40 before presenting it to the FDA for approval. SV40, a monkey virus, appeared in polio vaccines during FDR's term and is now allegedly present in COVID vaccines seventy-five years later. There are two legal definitions for BioNTech and the Pfizer jab. In 2021, the speaker discussed a documentary with Robert Malone and Robert McCullough, highlighting two Pfizer patents. The speaker suspected in 2020 that SV40 would be used in someone's jab, most likely Pfizer's. The speaker advised people not to take the jab, especially the Pfizer jab.

Every vaccine maker except Pfizer was ready to deploy the COVID jab when Operation Warp Speed came out. Pfizer allegedly went to their genetic department and used SV40 to design their jab because they were behind. They then allegedly used a molecular tool to remove the evidence of SV40 before presenting it to the FDA for approval. SV40 was present in the Cutter incident during FDR's term in polio vaccines. The speaker questions how a monkey virus from 1951-1959 appears in COVID vaccines 75 years later, and claims Pfizer tried to remove it. The speaker believes the official story is that "they wanted to kill people." In 2021, the speaker discussed in a Clubhouse Bitcoin room a documentary with Robert Malone and Robert McCullough, focusing on two Pfizer patents. The speaker suspected in 2020 that SV40 would be used in a jab, most likely Pfizer's, and advised people not to take the Pfizer jab.

Government regulators are influenced by big pharma, with FDA employees receiving royalties from approved vaccines and drugs. FDA's budget heavily relies on pharmaceutical industries, leading to agency capture. For instance, NIH owns half of the Moderna vaccine, with high-level deputies under Fauci receiving $150,000 annually from it indefinitely. This conflict of interest is not widely discussed in mainstream media, as speaking out can lead to censorship.

The speaker claims that this is not conspiracy theory and cites a BMJ publication by Retzaf Levy, which describes a process in vaccine development: vaccines were trialed under one formulation, but when the decision was made to deploy them globally, the process was changed and the product injected to the rest of the world. The speaker asserts that changing the process requires new trials, yet the EMA asked for an additional trial of 250 people after the process change, and that data was never delivered. This is described as a “bait and switch,” asserted as crucial for understanding why trial data is of zero consequence to what’s seen in the field, implying that real-world outcomes do not match trial data and that the numbers from trials are a caricature of field performance. The speaker claims Pfizer had early data indicating what would happen and acted on that by acquiring cancer companies: $43,000,000,000 into the acquisition of C Gen and $2,260,000,000 to acquire Trillium Therapeutics. Trillium is described as focused on blood cancers with the CD147 marker (CD Adaptor 147) on them, a marker claimed to be known to be involved in COVID. The implication is that Pfizer is building an investment portfolio in cancer companies that would benefit from the consequences the speaker alleges they caused. In summary, the vaccines on the market are said to be not the same formulation as what was tested in clinical trials, labeling this a “bait and switch” and a fraud, and asserting that vaccine effectiveness numbers are not reliable because the products differ from trial formulations and because those numbers decay over time. The speaker alleges significant DNA contamination, stating that 10 out of 11 studies have found this, with the remaining studies allegedly constrained by financial conflicts. The claim is that consensus among real studies supports DNA contamination, with several studies through peer review, which the speaker notes is difficult for those papers to pass through peer review. It is claimed that five peer-reviewed studies not originally examining contamination found DNA in blood and tissue upon sleuthing. The speaker asserts that cancer is on the rise and that several papers report cancer post-vaccination, including neoplasms at the site of injection. The claim is that this situation cannot be dismissed as coincidence and is described as “liability free” and often mandated. The speaker posits that this may be the largest carcinogenic hit to the human population, with vaccines on childhood schedules and given to pregnant women, stating that “this has gone absolutely off the rails.”

The mRNA technology used in vaccines may have hidden gene sequences intentionally designed to create harmful proteins like spider silk, leading to blood clotting. Plasmid contamination in Pfizer's injections could be intentional, allowing for the creation of functional proteins when read backwards. This intentional design raises concerns about nefarious intent behind the vaccine development. Further investigation is needed to determine the extent of potential harm caused by these hidden genes. The delayed discovery of these issues highlights the importance of transparency in medical technologies.

Pfizer is considering mutating the COVID virus to create new vaccines, but they don't want the public to know. They are conducting experiments on live monkeys to study the virus and its mutations. Pfizer believes that by controlling the mutations in their labs, they can develop vaccines for new variants before they even emerge in nature. This would be a lucrative business model for them. The pharmaceutical industry has a revolving door with government officials, which benefits the industry but is bad for everyone else. The comments made by Pfizer's Jordan Walker show a lack of moral compass and a disregard for public health. Pfizer believes it has successfully captured the regulatory apparatus and can circumvent laws. Governments are turning a blind eye to this unethical behavior.

The speaker discusses evidence suggesting preplanning of COVID countermeasures through leaked audio from AstraZeneca. Contracts for vaccines were signed before the virus was identified, raising suspicions. The Pentagon's involvement in initiating COVID work without informing Trump is highlighted. The motivation behind this preplanning is speculated to be a combination of financial gain, power, and control. The pharmaceutical industry's need for new intellectual property and the Pentagon's reliance on them for funding are also mentioned.

The speaker suggests that pharmaceutical companies want people to continuously take vaccines, even as they become sicker. They claim that these companies also acquire drugs to treat the injuries caused by the vaccines. For example, before rolling out COVID-19 vaccines for children, one of the companies acquired drugs to treat blood clots in children, which they believe the vaccines may cause. The speaker also mentions a large acquisition by Pfizer for novel cancer treatments, implying that they will cause the cancers they treat. The speaker concludes that pharmaceutical companies want people to be sick and dependent on their medications.

A recent study suggests that Pfizer may have excluded known deaths in the vaccine arm of its clinical trial from its data filing with the FDA in 2020. The study also found that trial subjects vaccinated with Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine experienced a significant increase in cardiovascular deaths compared to placebo controls. This information was not disclosed by Pfizer when the FDA was evaluating the vaccine for emergency use. Additionally, researchers identified instances where Pfizer attributed potential vaccine-associated deaths to other causes, undermining vaccine safety data. The data presented to the FDA prior to the authorization of Pfizer's vaccine did not include all the deaths that occurred during the trial. The speaker raises concerns about the prioritization of profit over lives and warns against trusting Big Pharma.

During the COVID pandemic, the Australian government granted Pfizer blanket immunity, allowing them to develop and distribute COVID injections without accountability. However, Pfizer has a history of criminal acts, including bribery and suppressing adverse trial results. The manufacturing process of the injections was also questionable, with evidence of live DNA derived from e coli found in the Pfizer product. The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) did not conduct thorough testing on each batch of injections, relying instead on the US FDA's word. The lack of long-term safety testing is concerning, especially considering Pfizer's record-breaking profits. The Australian taxpayers are left with an unknown liability, while those who question the injections are labeled as "anti-vaxxers." The speaker opposes the forced administration of untested experimental injections and calls for accountability.

Every childhood vaccine will be mRNA, becoming gene therapies that alter genetics without re-approval. COVID vaccines were profitable data and experimentation tools, but the danger lies in continued genetic tinkering. mRNA is being integrated into every vaccine. Therefore, no vaccines should be taken. All vaccines are being redesigned to include gene therapies because there is so much money in it.

Russia's Ministry of Defense accuses the US of using virus mutations for its own interests. They claim that the US collects pathogens from biolabs worldwide, which later become pandemics, benefiting American pharmaceutical companies. The ministry suggests collusion between big pharma and USAID through a company called Eko Health Alliance. They also mention an exercise at Johns Hopkins University where scientists transferred a coronavirus strain from bats to humans via a pig, just months before COVID-19 emerged. The US government's contradictory statements about the pandemic raise suspicions. Russia's defense ministry believes the US is preparing to establish biological control and create crisis situations. Concerns are raised about Dr. Anthony Fauci's involvement and his alleged financial gains from the pandemic.

The speaker discusses the unethical actions of the CDC in patenting the SARS coronavirus, the bioterrorism threat of the RT PCR test, and the gain of function research on coronaviruses. They highlight the financial motives behind the push for a universal vaccine template and call for an end to gain of function research and corporate influence in science. The speaker emphasizes the need for moral oversight and independent review boards in scientific research.

Pfizer is being sued for defrauding the government, but they claim they did not commit fraud. They argue they provided what the government requested, even if it was a faulty product distributed worldwide. This information is crucial and not widely known.

Pfizer knew their failed coronavirus modifications were dangerous, causing heart issues and death in animals. There is extensive literature, including patents and scientific publications, showing that they knew the heart was the target. The mRNA shots using pseudo uridine were known to generate tumors and rapid cancers. Remdesivir, with a 53% mortality rate, was chosen by the FDA as a COVID treatment, despite being deemed unethical by the World Health Organization due to its high death rate. The definition of adverse events was changed to exclude any causal link, allowing them to deny any negative effects. Data on these injections won't be published for another four and a half years.

A senior scientist at Pfizer in Kyiv reveals alarming details about a COVID-19 vaccine trial for children. Children aged 5-11 were unknowingly given the experimental vaccine, resulting in deaths and hospitalizations. Despite concerns raised, the trial continues with approval from authorities. The scientist is appalled by the lack of regard for children's safety and vows to push for the trial to be halted. The situation highlights unethical practices in medical trials.

The speaker believes COVID vaccine programs should be stopped. They are astounded by the number of papers critical of the vaccine or showing negative effects. The speaker claims a group of researchers funded by Pfizer and the NIH bullies editors to retract papers with negative findings about the vaccine. They assert the number of retractions is appalling. According to the speaker, in one instance where an editor resisted, Nature Springer bought the journal and retracted the paper. The speaker states that this is what they have been dealing with.