reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Decades of government neglect and abuse have fueled widespread anger, exacerbated by recent violations of civil rights during the pandemic. The erosion of trust in institutions, wealth transfer, and assaults on privacy and freedom have ignited righteous fury across the globe. The suppression of peaceful protests and demonization of dissenters by the media have further fueled public outrage. Politicians are now facing the consequences of their actions, with the public demanding accountability and unity to prevent further division. Parliament is once again fearful of the people, signaling a positive shift in power dynamics. Translation: Years of government neglect and abuse have led to widespread anger, worsened by recent violations of civil rights during the pandemic. The loss of trust in institutions, wealth transfer, and attacks on privacy and freedom have sparked justified anger worldwide. The suppression of peaceful protests and demonization of dissenters by the media have fueled public outrage. Politicians are now facing the consequences of their actions, with the public demanding accountability and unity to prevent further division. Parliament is once again afraid of the people, indicating a positive change in power dynamics.

In 2019, Parliament removed the crime of spreading false news from the Canadian Criminal Code, a provision that existed in the 1954 version. This raises questions about the trustworthiness of the government, especially when it comes to handling public health and media accountability. The government has been criticized for its financial practices, restricting access to effective treatments, and promoting vaccines without thorough investigations into their safety. Meanwhile, mainstream media outlets like CBC and CTV are perceived to operate without consequences for misinformation. This situation challenges the belief that elected representatives are looking out for the public's best interests.

We were elected by the people to represent their best interests in the European Parliament. However, the leaders of the Parliament have stripped away our fundamental rights without proper explanation. They are now conditioning access to the Parliament based on a green certificate, which violates people's freedom to choose whether they want to be vaccinated or tested. We also question whether European citizens were properly informed about what is happening. The contracts between pharmaceutical companies and the European Union were initially kept secret, but after pressure, they were disclosed. We believe in transparency and democracy, and it is our duty to fight for the freedom and liberty of the people.

The speaker says their role is to present context that, in their view, the past four years involved “orchestration to assault the liberties of people” by “pretending” the situation was a public health emergency while enabling “inconceivable threat to liberties” and “violation of human rights.” They frame this as “lip service to tyrants” and as “domestic and international terrorism.” They argue that evidence begins in the UK in 1966, saying the UK’s wealth and trust decided to fund “the coronavirus as the preferred form of human manipulation” in 1966. They then claim that one year later, the United States and the UK agreed to “modify and manipulate coronavirus” to see what could be done to infect a healthy population (described as 1967). They characterize “Operation Warp Speed” as arriving after 56 years. They cite an imaged 2011 document, described as stating “antitrust collusion” involving the Wellcome Trust, the Rockefeller Foundation, the Gates Foundation, NIAID, and the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. The speaker claims this group established a mandate that “by 2020, the world would accept… a universal vaccine” by the end of 2020, and they say the group identified coronavirus as the thing nature would need for the plan to happen. The speaker then quotes a 2015 public statement: “To sustain the funding base beyond the crisis, we needed to increase the public understanding of the need for medical countermeasures such as a pan influenza or pan coronavirus vaccine.” They say that at the time, the World Health Organization had officially declared coronavirus an eradicated disease, and they ask what world would need a vaccine for an eradicated disease. They argue that media hype drives economics: “A key driver is the media, and the economics will follow the hype,” and that “We need to use that hype to our advantage to get to the real issues.” They add that investors respond if they see profit, and characterize this as treason or terrorism. They say that Peter Daszak will testify in Congress in “a few short days” that the emergence likely came from a random event in Wuhan, China, where a bat and pangolin “got together and voila” by December, calling it “conspiracy level language.” The speaker asserts this is an admission of conspiracy “to commit acts of terror.” They also cite 2016 language, claiming an announcement that the Wuhan Institute of Virology Virus 1 was “poised for human emergence,” and treat this as part of the same “conspiracy.” Next, the speaker claims evidence includes a 2002 patent filed on “synthetic primary coronavirus,” which they say was “patented to be infectious and replication protective,” calling it “weaponized.” They further claim that in 2005, a curriculum vitae indicates “synthetic coronaviruses, biohacking, biological warfare enabling technologies,” and they question the meaning of that phrase, linking it to biological weapons. They state they have U.S. credentials since 2002 as a “biological weapons inspector” and say they briefed the matter since then. Finally, they cite a WHO Global Preparedness Monitoring Board announcement in September 2019, saying that between 09/19/2019 and September 2020 there would be “our greatest… accidental or intentional release of a respiratory pathogen,” emphasizing the word “release” as “not a leak” and suggesting no mention of accident likelihood.

150 years ago, people didn't need government permission for everyday activities like fishing, owning property, starting a business, or even setting up a lemonade stand. Now, almost everything requires government approval. If you believe you're still free, you're mistaken. You're essentially a controlled human in a tax system.

Does the government work for us or do we work for the government? What if the Constitution no longer applied and Congress's powers were used to extend their authority over every aspect of our lives? What if the president acted like a monarch and assumed everything he did was legal? What if our rights guaranteed by the Constitution have been distorted? What if the states were no longer sovereign entities and the Constitution was amended without proper ratification? What if the government controlled our speech, assembly, and protest? What if the military acted as law enforcement and our rights to privacy and property were violated? What if the government could decide when we were entitled to a jury trial and could take our property at will? What if our rights were stripped away and the government had unlimited power? What if our elected officials didn't truly represent us? What if the government could strip us of our rights based on where we were born? What if the income tax was unconstitutional? What if voting didn't matter and both political parties supported big government? What if the government could write any law, regulate any behavior, and tax any event without regard for the Constitution? What if we loved our country but hated what the government has done to it? What if sometimes we had to alter or abolish the government to truly love our country? What if freedom's greatest danger is now?

There should have been a revolution over the abuse and exploitation of our daughters, with the knowledge and complicity of authorities. They allowed a generation to be victimized without care, treating us as if we are insignificant. When we fear them, it’s tyranny; when they fear us, it’s democracy. We must unite and organize, as the focus on the Muslim vote overlooks that they represent only 7% of the UK population. The majority has had enough of mass immigration and ongoing wars. No one has consulted us on these critical decisions affecting our lives.

The speaker begins by discussing the loss of public accountability and the assault on liberties. They mention the funding of coronavirus research in 1966 and an agreement between the US and UK in 1967 to modify and manipulate the virus. They argue that this orchestrated assault on liberties has been happening for 56 years. They also mention a mandate established in 2011 for a universal vaccine by 2020. The speaker accuses various foundations and organizations of colluding to create a public health emergency for profit. They discuss patents filed in 2002 for a weaponized coronavirus and the use of the term "biological warfare enabling technology." The speaker claims that the World Health Organization predicted a release of respiratory medicine in 2019. They conclude by accusing MI5 of being involved in the distribution of the virus and discussing previous instances of crises being used to justify vaccine immunity and corporate immunity.

Elon, none of this could have happened without you giving the British public access to the truth and giving us free speech and fighting for our free speech. There needs to be massive government reform in Britain, and the people need to be in charge, not some bureaucracy that doesn't care. you can't get to the truth of things without freedom of speech. The essence of democracy is it should be a government for the people, by the people. And in fact, this is a government against the people and not for the people. The government needs to be responsible to the people of Britain. It needs to protect Britain. It needs to protect the the weak, those who cannot protect themselves, especially the children. if this continues, what world will you be living in? You either fight back or you die.

It is evident that people have been manipulated and controlled on a global scale for decades. Legislation changes were made to control doctors and individuals. However, thanks to individuals like Doctor Altman, Senator Babette, and Craig Kelly, we now realize that we have been deceived. We will not rest until those responsible are held accountable and their global agenda is exposed. Our goal is to ensure a better future for Australia, for the sake of our children and grandchildren. We are determined to save our country.

There should have been a revolution over the ongoing issues of rape, prostitution, torture, and murder affecting our daughters. It's not just the actions of certain groups but also the cover-ups by authorities who allowed this to happen. We are treated as cattle, and when we fear them, it becomes tyranny. We need to unite and organize as a majority, as Muslims represent only 7% of the UK population. We've had enough of mass immigration and wars that we never consented to. Key decisions impacting our lives are being made without our input, which is not democracy.

People worldwide are seeking freedom and accountability from their officials. The pandemic has provided an opportunity for unelected elites to seize more control over our rights and assets. An example is the Canadian truckers' protest against Trudeau, where their bank accounts were blocked. With the rise of digital currency and vaccination certificates, the potential for abuse is even greater. Allowing the WHO to have excessive power threatens our national sovereignty, constitutional supremacy, and fundamental rights. If global institutions, led by unelected individuals, take over our national authorities, we lose the ability to challenge their decisions, leading to draconian measures. Our rights are at stake.

Hello, I'm Dr. Tess Lawrie. The World Health Organization's pandemic agreement is set to be finalized by November 11 and adopted in December. However, the WHO has failed its mission to ensure health for all, and its authority is questionable due to its COVID policies. Consider the WHO as a gang imposing rules on us, demanding compliance and silencing dissent. We have options: comply, plead for change, escape, or confront them. Negotiating with such entities is unlikely to succeed. It's time to inform the WHO that their agreements are irrelevant to us, the people. Thank you.

Flat lie rule means illegitimate, not allowed on the throne. The speaker claims the British royal family were bankrupt after Waterloo and have been funded by the Rothschilds in exchange for breeding rights, with the Rothschilds holding the rights from 1819 to 02/2019. He asserts the royal family are Rothschild batards, with batard meaning bastard. He alleges he exposed George V as sired by Tsar Alexander III and Elizabeth II as sired by artificial insemination by Winston Churchill. Documents were sent to America, Russia, Israel, England, and the Pope and Archbishop of Canterbury, and were accepted by passive acquiescence with estoppel and action. He says the queen hid in Windsor Castle for coronavirus, which means crown him in Latin. The Pope and Queen abdicated. He claims American generals are contacting him and accepting him.

Speaker 0 argues that the world has been lied to for 110 years by a small group of criminal industrial conspirators who aim to subjugate humanity to enrich themselves, impoverish and kill others, and that the words “acceptable death rate” have become an industrial norm. They claim this is not just a political disagreement but a crime, asserting that the World Health Organization (WHO) and pharmaceutical companies authorized to begin the process of killing human beings in the interest of advancing their goals. The speaker declares this is a criminal cartel and states they will show documents proving it, insisting this is not an allegation but something that is provable by their own words. The four-step process alleged for executing nefarious plans is: 1) they begin by planning an exercise, 2) they fund that exercise, 3) they create the rationale for what they will do, and 4) they deploy and profit from it. They claim this violates 15 U.S. code section 19 (and connect it to the Clayton Act and the early formation of WHO in 1947), and they claim violation of the TFEU (the treaty for the functioning of the European Union), asserting Article 101 sets out that this was never public health but racketeering to instill terror to adapt population behavior. Data from Zurich is used to argue there was no pandemic: the speaker notes that during the death pandemic of the globe, life insurance claims fell by $30,000,000,000, stating that the data is unambiguous and that there was genocide rather than a pandemic. They pivot to the 2011 WHO, Welcome Trust, PATH, and Gates Foundation malaria vaccine program for children under six months, highlighting that 66 children in the vaccine group were murdered and 28 in the control group were murdered, with the control described as a cocktail of pathogenic injections rather than saline. The speaker references Article five, section 13, claiming immunity from arrest or legal process was designed as permanent immunity for a criminal organization formed in 1947; they connect the first WHO director general, Renee Sand (sic) from the Dachau-era milieu, to Brock Chisholm, who allegedly advocated population control as a primary objective. The claim extends to funding and influence: Gates Foundation allegedly provides 88% of WHO’s foundation donations, which the speaker says constitutes a tax and competition law violation in Europe and the United States. The four-step process is illustrated again with sourcing: to sustain funding beyond the crisis, to increase public understanding for medical countermeasures like pan-influenza or pan-coronavirus vaccines, and to use media hype to attract investors who see profit at the end of the process, as documented by the Global Preparedness Monitoring Board and Peter Daszak’s partnerships. The 2014 Rand Paul–Anthony Fauci correspondence is cited, showing a letter from NIAID to UNC Chapel Hill stating that gain-of-function research would continue during a moratorium with a budget funded by DARPA and NIH. The speaker quotes that the Wuhan virus was anticipated, citing a 2016 publication stating SARS-like Wuhan Institute of Virology virus one is poised for human emergence, implying foreknowledge and manipulation of the virus in Wuhan and UNC Chapel Hill. The talk shifts to the characterization of the work as biological warfare enabling technologies, referencing Ralph Baric’s 2005 DARPA/MITRE presentation and subsequent NIAID and DARPA funding, concluding that the project was to produce biological warfare enabling technologies rather than public health measures. They highlight substantial profits for Pfizer and Moderna from public funds and accuse the WHO of laundering money via a budget expansion request of 11%. In closing, the speaker maintains this is not a public health crime or constitutional crime, but a criminal conspiracy of criminal racketeers. They call for ending the criminal organization itself and urge everyone to destroy the WHO.

Clause 61 of Magna Carta states that no one, not even a king, is above the law. In medieval Europe, kings made promises to be just and take care of the people. But if a king failed to provide justice, a council of 25 barons could take over the kingdom without harming the king or his family. This was a significant moment because it made the king accountable on earth, not just in heaven. Throughout the Middle Ages, the idea that the king is not above the law became a constant reference.

In 2019, the Canadian government removed the crime of spreading false news from the Criminal Code. This raises concerns about trusting a government that takes our money, restricts effective treatments, and fails to investigate the safety of promoted vaccines. Additionally, the parliament we elect allows mainstream media to freely lie without consequences.

We are gathered here to discuss the World Health Organization and their proposed pandemic treaty. We believe our freedoms are at risk and want to protect our future and democracy. Please read our leaflet and research these institutions to understand the impact on Britain.

The speaker discusses the legality of the state in the Netherlands, claiming that it became illegal after the royal family fled during World War II. They argue that the first government was not democratically elected, making subsequent governments illegitimate as well. They mention that this issue has been brought to the attention of the constitutional court in Belgium since the Netherlands lacks a constitutional court. The speaker also suggests that the current situation in the Netherlands is still influenced by the Nazi regime. They mention the power held by the Secretary General of Justice and the untouchability of Demink. They conclude by stating that the only solution is for another country with a constitutional court, like Belgium, to have jurisdiction over the Netherlands.

A global shift in consciousness is underway, revealing government corruption. Article 61 in England allows citizens to reject government actions. The legal system is a man-made tool for control. After being arrested 27 times and having six cars crushed, I learned the legal language and questioned police authority due to their lack of legal training. I negotiated with judges, aware of their tactics. The government intrudes into every aspect of life, creating a web of control. Capitalism and healthcare shouldn't profit from illness. I envision a world filled with love and cooperation, not self-interest. If I had children, I wouldn't hand them over to a government that operates like a corporation.

In 2019, Bill C39 removed the crime of spreading false news from the Canadian Criminal Code. This change was discovered when comparing the 1954 and 2020 versions of the code. It raises questions about trusting the government, which is accused of stealing money, restricting effective treatments, and not properly investigating promoted vaccines. The parliament, elected to protect citizens, has granted mainstream media outlets like CDC and CTV the freedom to lie without consequences.

The speaker presents a message of alarm and action, arguing that anarchy in Washington DC stems from the federal government seizing powers and passing unconstitutional laws, with men acting as though they are above the Constitution. He claims a supranational, clandestine power structure governs world events. Key claim: a Committee of Three Hundred (also known in intelligence circles as the Olympians) consists of 300 men who run the world and who are sworn to secrecy. The speaker says he discovered this while in Africa, finding documents labeled above top-secret that revealed the committee’s influence. He asserts that the descendants of the British East India Company control The United States today, and that the 300 men govern global affairs with equal voting rights and no outvoting. The speaker traces the committee’s roots and influence to the British East India Company, opium profits, and a global elite. He asserts that in India House in London he found manifests showing opium trade profits that dwarned major carmakers’ profits for certain years, and that the 300 govern from Venice’s black nobility families (the Lucatis, the Rekanates, the Volpe Dumiserratis), boasting wealth that would make figures like David Rockefeller seem modest. He claims those families still run the world and name every member in his book The Committee of 300 and, later, in socialism, the road to slavery. The scope of control is described as worldwide and multi-branch: the Royal Institute for International Affairs (RIIA, aka Chatham House) is the executive arm; the Club of Rome, the Seni Foundation, the Mont Pelerin Society, the Order of Saint John are tapped as executive arms; the RIIA allegedly instructs U.S. policy through the Morgan Guarantee & Trust Bank, with Dennis Weatherstone as a conduit to the Secretary of State and then the President. The speaker alleges the Gulf War was orchestrated by Margaret Thatcher (in Aspen Institute) to instruct George Bush, framing it as unconstitutional and driven by an international agenda. He asserts that the Club of Rome (through Aurelio Peccei) sought to destroy U.S. industry and agriculture, citing Bertrand Russell’s influence and writings on overpopulation. He claims the Club of Rome’s “Zero Growth” post-industrial plan aimed to destroy the American middle class, destroy U.S. industries, and push a socialist transformation. Global 2000 is described as a Club of Rome genocide blueprint targeting mass population reduction by 2050, aimed particularly at decimating the U.S. middle class and other populations. The speaker links AIDS, HIV-era and other outbreaks to this plan, alleging deliberate creation and dissemination of pathogens via Fort Detrick, the World Health Organization, and other bodies, with assertions of experiments (CAB, Lassa fever, etc.) and a later shift to other viruses like HIV/AIDS, cholera, malaria, and black plague, all framed as part of population control under the global plan. He claims vaccines and viral campaigns in Africa and Brazil were weaponized to decimate populations, while the “black nobility” finances these operations through London and Venice. The speaker asserts that a vast network of bankers, insurance companies, mining conglomerates, and political organizations—including the Democrat Party in the U.S.—are controlled by the 300 and their secret society apparatus ( Illuminati, Society of the Cincinnati, etc.). He contends the strongest arm is the Club of Rome, and that the RIA/Club of Rome manipulated U.S. presidents through PMs, MI6, and other foreign controllers. He gives examples: Lincoln’s assassination, Wilson’s presidency, Kennedy’s murder, and later U.S. policy under Bush, Clinton, and others, as outcomes of control by London and the RIIA. The speaker contends that intelligence and political leadership are predetermined by the 300, not elected by the people. He argues the President and Secretary of State are chosen by the Royal Institute for International Affairs, not directly by the American electorate. He cites MacArthur, Dean Rusk, and Truman as exemplars of subversion by an international power structure that guides U.S. foreign policy. In closing, the speaker asserts the Constitution is immutable, condemns what he sees as creeping socialism, and calls for the dissolution of the Federal Reserve and a severing of the concord between the 50 states and the federal government. He frames the situation as a war to the death for the United States, urging Americans to reclaim state sovereignty and reject what he characterizes as unconstitutional measures, arguing that the United States consists of 50 nations with rights to dissolve the federal government if necessary.

The UK, the country of the Magna Carta, is allegedly sentencing people to jail for disagreeing with the government online or protesting against open border policies and mass immigration. People are reportedly being tried and jailed for months or years for disagreeing with the government. The speaker questions what options remain for UK citizens to disagree with their government without facing imprisonment. They cite the case of David Springer, a 61-year-old train driver caring for his sick wife, who was allegedly sentenced to jail for attending a protest, possibly shouting at the police. The speaker argues that the UK has a two-tiered justice system and is no longer a free nation because citizens lack democratic options to express disagreement. They cite the case of a mother of five sentenced to 26 months for throwing a can at the police and a man jailed for a Facebook post inciting racial hatred. The speaker concludes that the message is clear: disagreeing with the government results in imprisonment.

Fabricated evidence was used and the courts were lied to, to ensure a certain outcome, which should never happen again. The details of the report are worse than imagined. Without a certain important move, things would have been even worse, and they might have succeeded. This was an attempted overthrow of government, and many people were involved. They got caught red handed. The Durham report is coming out soon, and it contains this information, plus more. It's incredible this was caught. This is one of the great achievements because what was found should never happen again.

People in this country and globally have been steamrolled in a coordinated and integrated effort planned over decades. Legislative changes were implemented to control doctors and people. However, individuals are resisting, and those responsible will be held accountable. The aim is to expose the global agenda and secure freedom for the people of Australia in the future.