reSee.it - Related Video Feed

What matters is not which party controls our government, but whether the people control it. For too long, a small group in our capital has benefited from the government while the people have suffered. The establishment protected itself, not the citizens. But that's all changing, starting here and now.

A form of government is based on majority rule, but it can be dangerous. For instance, a lynch mob is an example of majority rule, where only one person disagrees and is silenced. This is pure democracy. However, a republic is different. It is a limited democracy that protects the rights of the minority. In a republic, a set of rules called the constitution is written to ensure that everyone follows them, regardless of temptation. This creates a constitutional republic.

What matters is not which party controls our government, but whether the people control it. For too long, a small group in our nation's capital has benefited from the government while the people have suffered. The establishment has protected itself, but not the citizens. This is all changing, starting now.

In a republic, the larger issue at hand is who governs. It is believed that We The People, under the constitution, hold the answer to this question.

No person is above the law, regardless of their position or title. This principle is fundamental to American justice. Everyone, including former presidents, must be held accountable under the same laws. There cannot be two justice systems; we must ensure that the law applies equally to all. The rule of law means that no one is exempt, and it is essential for maintaining a fair society. The idea that anyone could be above the law undermines the very foundation of our legal system. We must uphold this principle to ensure justice for everyone.

The celebration of this day is rooted in history. The men who pledged their lives, fortunes, and sacred honors knew the risk of high treason to the crown. Benjamin Franklin emphasized the importance of unity to avoid individual punishment.

You can lose your job as a public official without being convicted of a crime in our constitutional republic. Impeachment is not punishment, but a way to cleanse and restore honor and integrity to the office.

The Catholic Church, specifically Pope Boniface VIII in 1302, created the first expressed trust in history. This trust concept originated from Crusaders leaving their homes and riches behind to fight in Jerusalem. They would entrust their property to a trusted friend, who became the trustee. However, some trustees decided to keep the treasures when the Crusaders returned, and the courts supported their right to do so. This marked the beginning of the trust system, which worked for most people but not for those who didn't get their property back.

No one is above the law. This principle is emphasized repeatedly to stress that everyone is accountable under the law, regardless of their status or position. The message is clear: the law applies equally to all individuals.

Many people see freemasonry as positive, but corruption exists at the highest levels. The vow of silence, a gesture used for centuries, reminds members to keep secrets under threat of death.

Jury nullification is a powerful tool to veto corrupt laws. It allows jurors to judge the law itself, not just the facts of the case. This practice has been used throughout history, such as opposing the Federal Fugitive Slave Act and ending alcohol prohibition. The justice system is filled with victimless crimes, resulting in a high number of people behind bars. The war on drugs is seen as a war on freedom. Jury nullification provides a way for people to stand against unjust laws and protect individuals from the government's victimization.

The constitution prohibits titles of nobility. Therefore, while the president could name his son "baron," he cannot actually make him a baron.

In 1999, a group of 68 individuals discussed the potential unconstitutionality of entering the EU Treaty of Nice. They formed a committee of 25 members to petition the queen, who responded on the 39th day without addressing the issue properly. As a result, the committee invoked article 61 of Magna Carta in 2001, which means that the crown has lost its authority until the people restore our common law and constitution. Consequently, for the past 19 years, we have lacked a lawful government and courts with authority. The parliament has deceived and controlled us, stripping away our human rights and waging war against its own people. Additionally, there is mention of a pending app from Health Factory.

A speaker says friends argued the country was not founded on Christian principles, claiming instead that it was founded on common law: the Declaration of Independence refers to God four times, while the Constitution does not refer to God and only sets up the structure of government. The next speaker responds that the U.S. began as a collection of states and colonies, so state constitutions must be considered. They claim that at founding, 9 of the original 13 states required Bible-believing Christians to serve in government, and that 13 of 13 required a declaration of faith. They add that 9 of 13 required adherence to Protestantism (with Maryland being Catholic but still requiring a declaration of faith). They also claim that almost every original state constitution, including Pennsylvania, included an explicit profession that the person’s Lord and savior was Jesus Christ. The speaker further claims that 55 out of 56 of the original signers of the Declaration were Bible-believing, church-attending Christians. On common law, they say it was inherited from Blackstone, who was Christian, and that common law is an outgrowth of scripture. They list three “common law” principles—presumption of innocence, due process, and trial by jury—describing all as biblical principles. They connect these to a broader biblical principle from Leviticus 19: in administering justice, you shall not favor the rich or the poor, immediately before the command to love your neighbor as yourself. They also claim this relates to human equality reflected in the idea “neither slave nor Greek nor Jew” and that these are biblical ideas rather than “enlightenment” ideas. They address the Declaration’s references to God by pointing to “Laws of nature and nature’s God” and say the final paragraph reads as a prayer, appealing to the supreme judge of the universe, whom they identify as Jesus Christ, referencing Revelation. They add that Deuteronomy was the most quoted book in the founding era when creating constitutional material. They describe Deuteronomy as containing laws, customs, and traditions and as Moses’s farewell address, providing guidance on setting up a form of government. Quoting John Adams, they claim Adams said the Constitution was written for a moral and religious people and that it was inadequate for any other. They argue that a “Christian form of government” without a Christian population causes constitutional crisis and that liberty requires a Christian population. The speaker then discusses the First Amendment, saying “separation of church and state” is not in the U.S. Constitution and instead comes from a 1807 letter by Thomas Jefferson to the Danbury Baptist Convention. They contrast this with claims attributed to the Warren Court and Burger Court in the 1960s, and they focus on the Establishment Clause and a “free exercise” provision as expressed in the Constitution. They also claim early Congress funded Bible printing and distribution and that church services were held in the Supreme Court building as late as the Jackson presidency in the 1820s. They argue the concept is not biblical because there is no neutral morality, and they say morality comes from somewhere, with the Ten Commandments (the Decalogue) described as the core morality for society. They conclude by claiming that if the founders were not Bible-believing church-telling Christians, they would not have put Leviticus on the Liberty Bell, specifically citing Leviticus 25:19 about proclaiming liberty throughout the land. They describe the idea that the founders were “enlightenment” common law deists as an “unsubstantiated lie,” and they end by saying returning to Christian roots is America’s best hope for revival and a great future.

236 years ago, the founders signed our constitution, starting the United States of America. The constitution begins with the powerful words "We, The People," reminding us of our responsibility. As speaker, I use every constitutional tool, like the power of the purse and oversight of the executive branch, to stand up for the people. I take this duty seriously and see it as part of my oath of office. I will always follow the constitution, ensuring that government by the people, for the people, does not perish from the Earth.

Did you know Byzantine legal principles are still used in some parts of the world? Byzantine emperor Justinian set scholars to compiling his famous body of civil law Corpus Juris Civilis, which is the foundation of Roman law in Continental Europe today. These Byzantine legal principles were transmitted to Latin America, Quebec province and Louisiana through the Napoleonic code.

Clause 61 of Magna Carta states that no one, not even a king, is above the law. In medieval Europe, kings made promises to be just and take care of the people. But if a king failed to provide justice, a council of 25 barons could take over the kingdom without harming the king or his family. This was a significant moment because it made the king accountable on earth, not just in heaven. Throughout the Middle Ages, the idea that the king is not above the law became a constant reference.

Ron DeSantis attempted to revoke Disney World's self-governance rights due to their involvement in political matters. However, Disney World claimed that they answer only to the British crown, as the land they occupy is owned by Britain. Since 1960, Disney World has been a tax-exempt district, operating as an apolitical charity. DeSantis threatened to remove their tax-exempt status, but Disney World cited a clause from the British Bill of Rights, which grants Britain sovereignty over their territory until the last descendant of King Charles III passes. This clause, originating from the Magna Carta, allows Disney World to maintain their tax-exempt status. It is worth noting that Washington, DC, like Disney World, is also considered a territory of the crown. Some historians believe that England allowed America to have the illusion of freedom while still exerting control over them.

Courts uphold the rule of law, protecting us from arbitrary actions, even those resembling tyranny, as we've recently witnessed. They reinforce our values, specifically those enshrined in the Constitution, in a legal context. History provides numerous instances of this, and we've observed many examples in recent years as well.

What matters is not which party is in power, but if the government is controlled by the people. A small group in Washington has benefited while the people have suffered. The establishment protected itself, not the citizens. This changes now.

Our democracy is powerful in protecting individual rights and freedoms, but it is also fragile. Its strength depends on our willingness to fight for it.

What matters is not which party controls our government, but whether it is controlled by the people. For too long, a small group in our nation's capital has benefited from government while the people have suffered. The establishment has protected itself, neglecting the citizens. But that changes now.

The speaker asserts that today the most serious evil organization on the face of the earth is the Vatican. The argument then centers on the Knights of Malta, claiming that the six men who founded the CIA in America were all Catholics and members of the Knights of Malta. The speaker further contends that when examining banking fraternities in America, such as the Bank of America and Union Bank in California, the founders and current leaders of these banks, who are running the banking establishment today, are all Knights of Malta, described as Catholic Masonry. From there, the talk expands to a broader claim about European governance, stating that all the kings and rulers in Europe ruled by the divine right, referred to as the divine right of kings. The speaker then questions what represents divine to grant the king the right to rule, answering that the pope holds that role. The pope, according to the claim, appoints certain families to be over the French, and the pope appoints certain people to be over the Germans and over the British. The concept of divine right is then tied directly to the pope, with the assertion that the pope represents God. Because the pope represents God, he is said to be able to declare that a particular family is holy and should rule. Consequently, the speaker argues, this church authority could then claim that they rule by divine right. The overall narrative connects the Vatican, the Knights of Malta, and Catholic Masonry to influential administrative and governmental power structures, including the founding of the CIA and the leadership of major banks, and frames this as evidence of a global governance dynamic justified by divine right under papal authority.