reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Since May 2020, Remdesivir has been linked to a 30% death rate among patients receiving the drug for 5 to 10 days in hospitals. In New York, 26.9% of Medicare-aged patients who received Remdesivir died. The Cardiovascular Toxicology Journal found in October 2020 that Remdesivir is cardiotoxic and can cause death of heart cells. Despite this, the FDA and NIH continue to approve and recommend Remdesivir as the only drug for hospitalized COVID-19 patients. The World Health Organization published in April of last year that Remdesivir leads to increased acute kidney failure compared to other drugs. Shockingly, the FDA recently authorized the use of Remdesivir for newborns and children up to 18 years old.

At home, it is recommended to treat viral replication by giving zinc and other remedies like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin. However, the protocol followed was to provide no treatment until hospitalization. Once in the hospital, the treatment included ventilators and Remdesivir. It is claimed that Tony Fauci knew Remdesivir could be lethal, as it had caused harmful side effects in Ebola patients. The drug was then used in the pandemic, leading to kidney failure, heart failure, and organ collapse in those who died. The deaths were attributed to Remdesivir rather than the virus itself.

Treat COVID-19 at home with zinc and zinc-enhancing remedies like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin, which reduce viral spread. Current protocol delays treatment until hospitalization, using ventilators and remdesivir, known to cause harm. Fauci's promotion of remdesivir, despite its lethal side effects, led to unnecessary deaths from kidney and heart failure. The true cause of death during the pandemic was not the virus but remdesivir.

Tony Fauci's problem is that a federal law prohibits emergency use authorization for a vaccine if there is an approved medication that is effective against the target disease. If Fauci had acknowledged the effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine or Ivermectin against COVID, it would have been illegal to approve the vaccines. The medical community, including 17,000 doctors, supported the use of these medications, but Fauci dismissed them as dangerous. It is speculated that Fauci had a strong incentive to discredit these medications. Many doctors, such as Harvey Reach, Peter McCulloch, and Pierre Corey, who have successfully treated COVID patients, believe that hundreds of thousands of American lives could have been saved if these medications were not suppressed.

Since May 2020, Remdesivir has been linked to a 30% death rate among patients receiving the drug in hospitals for 5 to 10 days. In New York, 26.9% of Medicare-aged patients who received Remdesivir died. The Cardiovascular Toxicology Journal found in October 2020 that Remdesivir causes heart cell death and is cardiotoxic. However, the FDA and NIH continue to approve and recommend Remdesivir as the only drug for hospitalized COVID-19 patients, despite the World Health Organization's report in April of last year that it causes increased acute kidney failure. Shockingly, the FDA recently authorized the use of Remdesivir for newborns and children up to 18 years old.

A speaker claims remdesivir, an experimental drug, caused COVID-19 patient deaths in hospitals between days one and nine of a ten-day treatment. The speaker states that Dr. Anthony Fauci claimed in May 2020 that remdesivir was found safe and effective in an African drug trial in February 2019, and he hyperlinked the study in a memo to hospitals. The speaker says that the African trial actually showed a 53% death rate, leading the safety board to suspend remdesivir use and notify funders of its toxicity. The speaker alleges that Dr. Fauci and his NIH department funded the Ebola trial in Africa. The speaker accuses Fauci of lying to Congress and the American people by claiming the drug was safe and effective when the safety board deemed it too deadly and toxic.

Since May 2020, remdesivir may result in at least 30% death in hospitalized patients who receive it for five to ten days. CMS data for Medicare patients in New York showed 26.9% of those who received remdesivir died. In October 2020, the cardiovascular toxicology journal found remdesivir causes death of heart cells, is cardiotoxic, and can lead to cardiac arrest. Despite this, in December 2020, the NIH, with Anthony Fauci, updated guidelines listing remdesivir as the only FDA-approved drug for hospitalized Americans, even though the WHO published data in April of last year that it increases acute kidney failure compared to other drugs used to treat COVID-19. As of January 21st of this year, the FDA extended emergency use authorization, making remdesivir the only authorized medication that can be administered intravenously to newborns to 18-year-olds for COVID-19.

Before the pandemic, Dr. Fauci tested Remdesivir in an Ebola trial in Africa alongside four other drugs. However, the institutional review board (IRB), responsible for ensuring safety in clinical trials, intervened and removed Remdesivir from the trial due to its high fatality rate. Ebola typically kills 53% of those infected, but Remdesivir was causing even more deaths. It seems illogical to then administer this drug to individuals with a disease that has a much lower infection fatality rate of 1%. This decision appears questionable, but unfortunately, there is a history of similar actions being taken.

Ralph Barrick, the inventor of coronavirus and developer of Remdesivir, a drug used to treat COVID, had a hand in both. However, Remdesivir had a high kill ratio of 53% and was pulled by the World Health Organization for Ebola treatment. Despite this, in 2020, Anthony Fauci and others decided to use Remdesivir on COVID patients, knowing it would cause deaths. This was premeditated murder, with the criminals sitting next to President Donald Trump. There are other individuals involved as well. Efforts are being made by courageous sheriffs and DAs to compile evidence of the deaths caused by Remdesivir and take legal action to end these felonies.

In 2011, 2012, and 2014, publications revealed that pseudouridine in mRNA shots could cause rapid cancers. Remdesivir, with a 53% mortality rate, was chosen by the FDA for COVID treatment despite being deemed unethical by the World Health Organization due to high death rates in Africa. This lethal drug was administered regardless of viral load, resulting in unnecessary deaths.

Patients are dying not from COVID, but from treatments like remdesivir causing organ failure. One person's mother died after being given remdesivir against their wishes, leading to organ shutdown. There was a financial incentive for hospitals to admit patients and put them on ventilators, resulting in unnecessary treatments and deaths.

Speaker 0 describes contracting COVID from his gardener, noting that the gardener had it first and died, while he survived. He says, “I got COVID from my gardener, and he had it first, and then I got it. I was like, ah, did I grab the hose or what, you know, what was I don't know. But it was it was I knew the guy for twenty years, and we both went to the same hospital. And he died, and I didn't. Jesus.” He claims they both received remdesivir, saying, “I think we both got remdesivir, which is not good. Not good. Not good. Causes kidney failure. I know.” He adds that he couldn’t walk for three months after receiving that treatment and that, “I couldn't walk for three months after I had that stuff. Really? Because it kills you.” He says he learned afterward that remdesivir “kills you,” and he ties this to a question about Fauci: “and that's why I wonder about Fauci, you know.” Speaker 1 responds, suggesting that the audience should indeed “wonder about that guy,” and contrasts this with actions he describes as preventing people from obtaining monoclonal antibodies: “Oh, you should wonder about that guy. When meanwhile, they were trying to stop people from getting monoclonal antibodies.” He criticizes the restriction of monoclonal antibodies as “fucking insane” because it followed a push to promote vaccines for profit, stating, “They've restricted monoclonal antibodies, which is fucking insane because they wanted to promote that vaccine because they wanted a profit off of it, which brings us back again to evil.” He asserts, “Evil's real. It's real. Putting money over human lives is evil. I agree.” He adds that there is a temptation to pursue such income, calling it “a real thing,” and reaffirms, “and there's a there's a temptation to do it too, which is even more crazy. Yeah.”

The speaker accuses Dr. Anthony Fauci of knowing that the drug remdesivir would be deadly and deliberately denying effective treatments for COVID-19. They claim that treatments like zinc, hydroxychloroquine, and ivermectin, which have been shown to reduce the spread of the disease, were not used. They also allege that remdesivir causes kidney and organ failure and that it was responsible for many deaths during the pandemic. The speaker suggests that the pharmaceutical companies and healthcare organizations should be held liable for the damage caused by their products and actions. They mention the deaths of two teenage boys after receiving the Pfizer vaccine and question the safety and effectiveness of vaccines for children. The speaker accuses Dr. Fauci, Ralph Barrick, and Peter Daszak of colluding to create and weaponize the coronavirus. They argue that these actions constitute genocide and crimes against humanity. They call for the prosecution of those involved and the destruction of the system that allows such crimes to occur.

Speaker 0: There were four drugs that were being tested for Ebola. Remdesivir killed more people than placebo, and the data safety monitoring board had actually stopped the study where literally fifty three percent of Speaker 1: the patients died in the failed Ebola trial and was repurposed. It was a failed Ebola drug because it caused more harm than good in Ebola trials. It was still unpatent. It was Tony Fauci's drug of choice. The majority of hospital deaths were actually caused by Anthony Fauci because his NIH put out protocols that if the hospital systems adhered to, they got bonuses, big bonuses, lots of money, $3,000 per for putting an IV in of remdesivir. Boom. $3,000. But guess what? On top of the entire hospital stay, a 20% bonus, that could be hundreds of thousands of dollars. Speaker 0: The data was so overwhelming that remdesivir killed patients more so than placebo. The drug had to be stopped, and this was published in the New England Journal in the 2019. Speaker 2: What happened during COVID could not have happened without propaganda and censorship. And how do we overcome that propaganda and censorship? It's primarily through people not being willing to shut up.

Tony Fauci's problem is that a federal law prohibits emergency use authorization for a vaccine if there is an approved medication that effectively treats the target disease. If Fauci or anyone had acknowledged that Ivermectin works as a treatment for COVID, the vaccine would not have received authorization. Despite many doctors and publications supporting Ivermectin, Fauci actively dismissed it as a dangerous medication to drown out its effectiveness. It is unclear why he continued to do so after receiving authorization, but there is a strong incentive for him to discredit Ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine. Notable doctors like Harvey Reich and Pierre Cory have successfully treated thousands of COVID patients.

At home, it is recommended to treat viral replication by giving zinc and other zinc-enhancing remedies like hydroxychloroquine and Ivermectin. However, the protocol followed by hospitals was to provide no treatment until admission, and then use ventilators and Remdesivir, which were known to be harmful. Tony Fauci was aware of the dangers of Remdesivir, as it caused lethal side effects in Ebola patients. Despite this, he manipulated a study to make Remdesivir the standard of care, resulting in kidney failure, heart failure, and organ collapse in COVID-19 patients. The deaths attributed to the virus were actually caused by Remdesivir.

In 2018, remdesivir was considered unethical for Ebola clinical trials in Africa due to a 53% kill rate, higher than Ebola's typical mortality. Despite this, it was chosen to treat COVID in April and May 2020, with Anthony Fauci and Deborah Burke advocating for its use despite the World Health Organization's ethical concerns. The speaker claims that a conflict of interest exists because the same entities that financially benefit from promoting certain products are declaring the pandemic. These entities are allegedly linked to the Eugenics office at Carnegie Mellon in 1913 and the establishment of the World Health Organization in 1953. The speaker expresses concern about the influence of eugenics on these decisions.

We ended our previous episode with our COVID pyramid, build layer upon layer of lies, deceit, fraud, scandals. Now, by now you’re wondering how so many hospitals, doctors, and health care workers went along with all of the above. We have reached the capstone of our nauseating COVID pyramid. Pyramid. We shall name the capstone M and M, money and murder in hospitals. Shocking as it may sound, we’ve seen it before. Remember the unjust administering the killer drug midazolam in The UK as shown in part 19? Well, The US and many other countries had their own version called remdesivir. Here’s what happened. Hospitals were given incentives, as in money, for each and every COVID casualty. According to whistleblowers, investigative journalists, lawyers, and specialists, Hospitals in The US have been receiving $13,000 for every admitted COVID patient. There have been financial extras for every COVID test, for every positive outcome. If patients were treated with the only prescribed drug, remdesivir, the hospital received yet another bonus: 20% of the entire hospital bill of the patient. Then for every patient put on a ventilator, the hospital received $39,000. And if that patient officially died of COVID nineteen, they got yet another $13,000. That’s a lot of money. According to attorney Thomas Renz and CMS whistleblowers, the hospitals receive approximately $100,000 per COVID casualty if the above protocol was followed. Now the thing is, the American hospitals received this money in advance based on the COVID predictions, based on the flawed models of people like Brooks. If the hospitals didn’t actually meet those models, they had to pay that money back at a later stage. And we’re talking millions of dollars here. So what happened? Everybody who was admitted to a hospital, for instance because of a car accident or because of cancer or diabetes or kidney failure, everybody got a PCR test to start with. Due to the ridiculous amount of cycles, there was an abundance of false positives. False positives equals positives equals COVID patients equals money. Hence, the sunrise in COVID patients. Then remdesivir left its detrimental mark just like midazolam had done in The UK. You see, remdesivir is not a new drug. It was used in 2018 during the West African Ebola outbreak. It was known to have severe adverse effects such as kidney damage, liver damage, and even death. Yet in 2020, Anthony Fauci directed that remdesivir was to be the drug hospitals used to treat COVID nineteen, hence the incentives. So what happened next? Those poor patients only got worse, after which they were put on a ventilator. After all, that was yet another bonus of many thousands of dollars pouring straight into the pockets of the hospitals. Now the problem with ventilators is that the patient is put into an induced coma. His or her breathing is taken over by a machine that puts extra pressure on the lungs called barrow pressure. In the case of damaged lungs due to for instance pneumonia, those lungs will only get worse. The chances of that patient recovering, of being able to be taken off the ventilator and to start breathing by himself are very, very small. Combined with organ failure as a result of remdesivir, the chances of that patient ever leaving the hospital alive are next to nothing.

In 2018, remdesivir was described as one of the speaker’s “favorite targets,” but it was said to have been considered too unethical for Ebola clinical trials in Africa because a “53% kill rate” was published in medical journals. The speaker contrasts this with the choice made in April and May 2020 to use remdesivir as the drug of choice to treat COVID, stating that the drug was still treated as unacceptable for African trials due to the alleged 53% kill rate. The speaker claims that Anthony Fauci and Deborah Birx were present next to the president advocating for remdesivir, while stating that the World Health Organization said it was unethical to use. The speaker frames the issue as a lack of accountability and justice as long as financial interests determine what product is promoted, arguing that if the entity declaring a pandemic is also driven by financial interests, there is no possibility for accountability. The speaker also alleges that the decision-makers were formed out of the Eugenics Office at Carnegie Mellon in 1913, and that the same group established the World Health Organization in 1953. The speaker asserts that this group was making the decision in 2020 regarding remdesivir and says they have a problem with eugenics.

Remdesivir, one of four drugs tested for Ebola, allegedly killed more people than the placebo, leading the Data Safety Monitoring Board to halt the study. According to the transcript, 53% of patients died in the failed Ebola trial, but the drug was repurposed. It is claimed that Remdesivir was Anthony Fauci's drug of choice, and that the NIH protocols, which provided hospitals with bonuses for using remdesivir, caused the majority of hospital deaths. Reportedly, hospitals received $3,000 for each remdesivir IV and a potential 20% bonus. The data allegedly showed that remdesivir killed more patients than the placebo, resulting in the drug trial being stopped. One speaker stated that it is inexplicable that remdesivir became the standard of care, and that doctors seemingly shut off their brains and followed directions from above without questioning the use of remdesivir in every hospitalized patient.

In 2018, remdesivir had a high kill rate in Africa, making it unsuitable for Ebola trials. Yet, in 2020, it became the top choice for treating COVID-19. Despite objections from the World Health Organization, Anthony Fauci and Deborah Birx endorsed its use. The issue lies in allowing those with financial interests to dictate pandemic responses, potentially influenced by eugenics ideologies.

Treat COVID at home with zinc, hydroxychloroquine, ivermectin, and other remedies that reduce viral spread. Current protocol delays treatment until hospitalization, using harmful ventilators and remdesivir. Fauci knew remdesivir's dangers from Ebola trials. He manipulated data to make it standard care, causing kidney and heart failure. Many pandemic deaths were due to remdesivir, not the virus.

In 2018, remdesivir, described as one of my favorite targets, was deemed too unethical to put into Ebola clinical trials in Africa because it had a fifty-three percent kill rate published in medical journals. The speaker notes that Ebola doesn’t have a fifty-three percent kill rate, yet in April and May 2020 it was chosen to be the drug of choice to treat COVID. The drug was considered too unethical to use in an African clinical trial because it was killing fifty-three percent of the people to whom it was given. The speaker asserts that Anthony Fauci and Deborah Birx were sitting next to the president advocating the use of remdesivir despite the World Health Organization stating it was unethical to use it. The central problem identified is that, as long as the financial interest that dictates which product is promoted is the one making the declaration of the pandemic, there is no possibility for accountability and no possibility for justice. The speaker argues that the decision-making is influenced by a lineage described as having emerged from the Eugenics office, specifically naming Carnegie Mellon in 1913, the same group of people that established the World Health Organization in 1953. The speaker claims that this same group is the one making the current decisions. The speaker asks the audience to consider their feelings about Eugenics and concludes by expressing a problem with it, tying these connections to the governance and promotion of pandemic responses.

Speaker 0: Remember that in 02/2018, remdesivir, one of my favorite targets, remdesivir was too unethical to put into Ebola clinical trials in Africa because it had a fifty three percent kill rate published in medical journals. Ebola doesn't have a fifty three percent kill rate, but it was chosen in April and May 2020 to be the drug of choice to treat COVID. This drug was too unethical to use in an African clinical trial because it was killing fifty three percent of the people that it was given to. And we had Anthony Fauci, Deborah Burke sitting next to the president going, we need to use remdesivir despite the fact that the World Health Organization said it was unethical to use it. Here's the problem. The problem is as long as the financial interest that dictates what product is going to be promoted is the one making the declaration of the pandemic, We have no possibility for accountability. We have no possibility for justice. And what we do is we allow people who were formed out of the Eugenics office, Carnegie Mellon in 1913, that same group of people that were the same group of people that established the World Health Organization in 1953, that same group of people are the ones who are making this decision. And I don't know how you feel about Eugenics, but I have a problem with it.

I've stated since May 2020 that remdesivir will result in at least 30% death in those who receive it in the hospital. I had data pulled for Medicare patients in New York, and found that 26.9% of those who received remdesivir died. As of October 2020, the cardiovascular toxicology journal found that remdesivir causes death of heart cells and can lead to cardiac arrest. Yet, in December, the NIH decided to update all guidelines for treatment drugs allowed for COVID-19, and remdesivir was the only FDA-approved drug for hospitalized Americans, despite the WHO publishing that it causes increased acute kidney failure. As of January of this year, the FDA extended an emergency use authorization, making remdesivir the only authorized medication that can be administered to newborns to 18-year-olds.