reSee.it - Related Video Feed

In May 2024, 194 WHO member states will vote on international agreements for pandemic prevention behind closed doors. These agreements give the WHO leadership in health matters related to pandemics, but the process is not widely reported or discussed in the media, parliaments, universities, or society.

The speaker raises concerns about a new convention on pandemic prevention and preparedness that would give the World Health Organization (WHO) more power. They argue that this would require a significant financial commitment from the US without proportional voting power. The convention would also require the US to give 20% of vaccines and pandemic-related products to the WHO, transfer intellectual property rights, and give the WHO a leading role in fighting misinformation. The speaker criticizes the WHO for its failure to detect the COVID-19 pandemic and accuses the Biden administration of considering joining the convention without Senate approval. They call for the amendment to be submitted to the Senate for review.

The speaker expresses concerns about the World Health Organization (WHO) and its proposed pandemic treaty. They question the WHO's ability to learn from past mistakes and argue that giving the organization more power could lead to catastrophic errors. The speaker discusses the WHO's structure, funding, and influence, highlighting the role of external sources such as the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. They criticize the WHO's reliance on private-public partnerships and claim that member states have limited input in decision-making. The speaker also raises concerns about the WHO's ability to define information and determine what is considered settled science. They emphasize the importance of considering the potential costs to democracy and individual freedoms.

The WHO is developing a pandemic treaty and amendments to international health regulations that will remove human rights protections and enforce surveillance and censorship. The goal is to develop vaccines in 100 days. The amendments would bind states to enforceable edicts, provide a liability shield, remove intellectual property rights, move supplies between countries, and enforce digital passports. The WHO director general can declare a pandemic with no standards, and countries must obey. The WHO will dictate which drugs can be used. One Health is a concept to enable the WHO to take over jurisdiction, suggesting humans are no longer of greater value than animals.

"There's the transformative, if I might use that word, experience that we've all had now in year five of COVID." The speaker says, "The thought that we won't have another pandemic, I think is naive at best and just not completely unrealistic at worst." They add, "I'm convinced that there will be another pandemic and that's the reason why we have to be perpetually prepared to prevent the terrible impact of a pandemic."

The speaker discusses the power of the World Health Organization (WHO) during a public health emergency or pandemic. They mention that the WHO can declare recommendations and impose various restrictions, such as lockdowns and surveillance. They also highlight the potential requirement for proof of vaccination. The speaker emphasizes that the WHO will have control over health-related information, including the right to censor and interfere in social communication. These provisions are present in the International Health Regulations and the proposed pandemic treaty. The summary concludes by mentioning the importance of discussing these matters.

The UN General Assembly adopted a declaration on pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response. The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted societies and economies, exposed political fault lines, and eroded trust. Misinformation and inequality worsened the impact on vulnerable communities. A new pandemic accord and amendments to international health regulations are being negotiated by WHO member states to strengthen the global response. National ratification and accountable implementation are crucial to avoid repeating past mistakes. We must not return to a cycle of panic and neglect. Together, we are stronger.

The speaker introduces the plan and documents for negotiation, which include a new pandemic treaty and amendments to international health regulations. They express concern over the World Health Organization's push to increase its powers and control over countries and individuals. The reform process began in 2021, with two separate legal instruments being prepared: a new treaty and amendments to existing regulations. These drafts will be negotiated and finalized, with member states voting on them in May 2024. The process is happening quickly and behind closed doors, without public reporting.

The speaker discusses the global implementation of measures like mask mandates and testing requirements, following the World Health Organization's (WHO) recommendations. The WHO is set to gain more authority, with member states recognizing it as a coordinating authority. The speaker raises concerns about the WHO's power to command states to enforce lockdowns or vaccine mandates, with countries deploying their police and military against their own citizens. There are discussions about potentially removing human rights and freedoms from the regulations, while an independent advisory committee is created to protect human rights. The goal is to advance the WHO's new world order at the upcoming World Health Assembly, with finalized agreements in a year's time, unless people pressure their governments to stop the plans.

The Indonesian health minister mentioned international health regulation amendments. The European Union aims to lead negotiations for a new legally binding international agreement on pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response. Member states like Bangladesh want to remove the word "non-binding" from WHO recommendations, making them binding. Malaysia proposes that recommendations under Article 15 and 16 must be initiated and completed promptly by all state parties. India seeks to remove the words regarding human rights and fundamental freedoms from Article 3. These countries independently propose similar ideas, raising suspicions.

The speaker emphasizes the importance of technology and digital infrastructure for managing vaccines and future pandemics. They highlight the need for data on vaccinations and the necessity of a proper digital infrastructure, which many countries lack. The speaker suggests that the G20 should focus on creating partnerships and mechanisms for handling future pandemics effectively. They mention the role of formal institutions like the WTO and organizations without bureaucracy and politics. The speaker concludes by stating that politicians will prioritize a plan if they see its relevance in the near future.

In this exchange, the speakers reference the World Health Organization’s ten-year plan. The first speaker states that the plan has long warned: “for the coming 10 years, there will be a large infectious disease crisis,” and notes that “this was year 1.” The second speaker adds that the aim is to prepare and help, should a second pandemic occur, and asserts that, based on years of the speakers’ discussions, “the chance that a second pandemic comes is very large.” The first speaker reiterates that there is consensus and that the plan has anticipated a major infectious disease crisis over the decade, emphasizing that the warning has been a longstanding part of the plan.

Hello, I'm Dr. Tess Lawrie. The World Health Organization's pandemic agreement is set to be finalized by November 11 and adopted in December. However, the WHO has failed its mission to ensure health for all, and its authority is questionable due to its COVID policies. Consider the WHO as a gang imposing rules on us, demanding compliance and silencing dissent. We have options: comply, plead for change, escape, or confront them. Negotiating with such entities is unlikely to succeed. It's time to inform the WHO that their agreements are irrelevant to us, the people. Thank you.

The speaker discusses new pandemic agreements that give the WHO unprecedented power to declare emergencies and mandate medical interventions globally. These agreements also allow for censorship, state-controlled economies, and limited accountability for the WHO. Fundamental rights may be compromised under this regime.

The UN general assembly adopted a declaration on pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response. The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted societies and economies, exposed political fault lines, eroded trust, and highlighted inequalities. The next pandemic is inevitable, so WHO member states are negotiating a new pandemic accord and amendments to strengthen the global response. National ratification and accountable implementation are crucial to avoid repeating past mistakes. We must not return to the cycle of panic and neglect. Our world needs to be stronger for future generations.

The UN General Assembly adopted a declaration on pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response, emphasizing the need for a collective approach. The COVID-19 pandemic has caused immense damage, affecting lives, economies, and societies. It has exposed political divisions and worsened inequalities, hitting the most vulnerable communities the hardest. It is not a matter of if, but when the next pandemic will occur. To address this, WHO member states are negotiating a new pandemic accord and amendments to international health regulations. However, it is crucial to go beyond negotiations and ensure national ratification and accountable implementation. We must break the cycle of panic and neglect to protect future generations. Together, we are stronger.

The World Health Organization (WHO) is facing criticism for its push to extend its powers and control over countries and people's self-determination. An independent evaluation will be conducted to review pandemic preparedness and response. The WHO's proposed pandemic treaty and international health regulations have raised concerns about its authority over health decisions, including vaccines, treatments, and surveillance. The treaty could impose restrictions, lockdowns, and experimental treatments without respecting human rights. The WHO claims absolute leadership in all health matters, but some argue that this level of authority has never been seen before. Supporters argue that these measures are necessary to protect the global population. The final vote on these agreements will take place in May 2024.

The speaker discusses the new pandemic treaty and amendments to the international health regulations proposed by the World Health Organization (WHO). They express concern over the potential impact on countries' sovereignty and people's self-determination. The speaker highlights that these changes will affect everyone and reduce democratic participation. They mention the WHO's claim to absolute leadership in health measures and the power to impose restrictions, lockdowns, and experimental treatments. The speaker also emphasizes the WHO's control over information and the lack of mechanisms to challenge their assessments. They argue that without open debate and different opinions, there can be no science or democracy. The speaker calls for the negotiations to be stopped and urges citizens to pressure their political representatives.

The speakers discuss the achievements of the World Health Organization (WHO) in the past two years. They mention that the WHO is passing amendments to international health regulations, which member countries must actively opt out of to avoid accepting them. They express concern about the power given to the WHO's director general during a pandemic, as they can decide what actions to take. The speakers also mention that the definition of a pandemic has been changed, potentially leading to a situation where even a small number of cases in different countries could be classified as a pandemic. This would allow the WHO to seize governing powers of member states.

The WHO has announced a global police force to control and censor opposition. They plan to use medical tyranny to take over and are pushing for a world treaty. The head of WHO, Tedros, openly talks about using disease x for total control. However, people are waking up to their agenda. It is important to expose this for our own survival. On the other hand, Speaker 1 discusses the need for a pandemic agreement to better prepare for future outbreaks. They emphasize the importance of a shared response and hope that member states will deliver this agreement by May 2024. Speaker 2 promotes Infowars as a source of truthful information.

The COVID pandemic highlighted the tragic failures in the availability of vaccines and medicines. In response, the World Health Organization proposed a pandemic treaty in 2021, emphasizing equity as its core principle. This treaty aims to ensure that everyone, regardless of their circumstances or location, has access to life-saving resources. By promoting shared data and allocating resources more fairly, the treaty would bring together problem solvers from different populations and countries to better prepare and respond to future epidemics. It is crucial to address the inequities experienced during the pandemic to protect humanity, as viruses do not respect political borders. A shared future is our only way forward.

The UN General Assembly adopted a declaration on pandemic prevention, preparedness, and response. The COVID-19 pandemic disrupted societies and economies, exposed political fault lines, and eroded trust. The next pandemic is inevitable, so WHO member states are negotiating a new pandemic accord and amendments to strengthen the global response. National ratification and accountable implementation are crucial to avoid repeating past mistakes. We must not return to the cycle of panic and neglect. Together, we are stronger.

This morning, the United Nations approved a political declaration on pandemic prevention. In May 2024, the WHO will have a final vote on international agreements behind closed doors. The WHO seeks absolute leadership in health matters related to pandemics.

The speaker criticizes the World Health Organization (WHO) for its lack of accountability and the influence of pharmaceutical companies. They argue that proposed regulations would give the WHO more power, including the ability to make binding recommendations and enforce financial contributions from countries for pandemic response. The regulations could also require the sharing of intellectual property, mandate vaccine production and international sharing, and override national safety approval processes. Another speaker highlights the agility of the UK's response to COVID-19 after leaving the European Union and suggests it as a model for the future. The speaker warns that the WHO's powers could include ordering border closures, travel restrictions, contact tracing, forced quarantining, medical examinations, proof of vaccination, and forced medication, even in potential emergencies.

The speaker expresses concern over the World Health Organization's (WHO) proposed new pandemic treaty and amendments to the International Health Regulations. They argue that these changes will diminish countries' sovereignty and individuals' rights, erode democratic participation, and grant the WHO excessive power. The speaker highlights the lack of transparency and public debate surrounding these negotiations. They emphasize that the WHO will have authority over health matters, including imposing restrictions, lockdowns, and experimental treatments. The speaker also criticizes the WHO's control over information and the absence of mechanisms to challenge their decisions. They conclude by urging citizens to pressure their political representatives to halt these negotiations.