reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The World Health Organization has become a corrupt entity, heavily influenced by China. When the pandemic began, it covered for the Chinese Communist Party, leading to the termination of the U.S. relationship with the organization. The U.S. was paying nearly $500 million annually, while China contributed only $40 million. Joe Biden foolishly rejoined without negotiations and is now pushing a pandemic treaty that would undermine U.S. sovereignty. This treaty would require the U.S. to supply medical resources to other countries and promote censorship on public health matters. Under a future Trump administration, this treaty would be terminated, and the U.S. would withdraw from the WHO, which failed during COVID. A new coalition of nations focused on health and sovereignty would be established. Biden missed the chance to renegotiate a lower fee for WHO membership, opting instead for the higher cost.

The speaker raises concerns about a new convention on pandemic prevention and preparedness that would give the World Health Organization (WHO) more power. They argue that this would require a significant financial commitment from the US without proportional voting power. The convention would also require the US to give 20% of vaccines and pandemic-related products to the WHO, transfer intellectual property rights, and give the WHO a leading role in fighting misinformation. The speaker criticizes the WHO for its failure to detect the COVID-19 pandemic and accuses the Biden administration of considering joining the convention without Senate approval. They call for the amendment to be submitted to the Senate for review.

The speaker criticizes the World Health Organization (WHO) for its lack of accountability and the immunity it grants to its affiliates. They argue that the WHO has granted itself extraterritorial and extrajudicial rights that no other institution would have. The speaker believes that no institution should have absolute immunity and highlights the potential for corruption and malfeasance. They claim that the COVID narrative was a premeditated, genocidal program carried out by racketeering co-conspirators who violated laws in the United States and Europe. The speaker specifically mentions the World Health Organization's Global Preparedness Monitoring Board as a violation of the Clayton Act in the US and a criminal collusion network.

The World Health Organization (WHO) has been accused of being a criminal cartel that has manipulated public health for profit, leading to widespread harm. The speaker argues that the WHO's actions, including the handling of vaccines and the COVID-19 pandemic, reflect a long history of deceit and exploitation. They assert that the organization was founded with the intent to commit crimes, using tactics that prioritize profit over public health. The speaker emphasizes the need to recognize these actions as organized crime and calls for the dismantling of the WHO, rather than merely limiting its power. This is framed as a necessary step to address the alleged global terrorism and profiteering that has resulted from the WHO's operations.

The speaker expresses concerns about the World Health Organization (WHO) and its proposed pandemic treaty. They question the WHO's ability to learn from past mistakes and argue that giving the organization more power could lead to catastrophic errors. The speaker discusses the WHO's structure, funding, and influence, highlighting the role of external sources such as the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. They criticize the WHO's reliance on private-public partnerships and claim that member states have limited input in decision-making. The speaker also raises concerns about the WHO's ability to define information and determine what is considered settled science. They emphasize the importance of considering the potential costs to democracy and individual freedoms.

The speaker criticizes the World Health Organization (WHO), claiming it is corrupt and controlled by China. They highlight how the US paid a significant amount to the WHO while China paid much less. The speaker mentions terminating America's relationship with the WHO and criticizes President Biden for rejoining without negotiations or reforms. They express concern about a proposed pandemic treaty that would require the US to send medical supplies to other countries and censor free speech. The speaker pledges to withdraw from the WHO, abolish and replace it, and form a new coalition of nations committed to health protection, sovereignty, and freedom. They also mention a missed opportunity to renegotiate the WHO deal for a lower cost.

The WHO, under the leadership of the United States, is developing a pandemic treaty and amendments to international health regulations. These changes would remove human rights protections, enforce surveillance and censorship, restrict freedom of speech, and promote a single narrative. Vaccines could be developed in just 100 days, according to the organization CEPI. The amendments would bind states to enforceable measures, provide a liability shield, eliminate intellectual property rights, enforce digital passports, and allow the WHO director general to declare a pandemic without standards. The WHO would also dictate which drugs can be used during a pandemic. Additionally, the concept of One Health would give the WHO jurisdiction over climate change, animals, plants, water systems, and ecosystems, while devaluing humans compared to animals. (150 words)

The World Health Organization has become a corrupt entity, influenced by China, especially during the initial COVID-19 outbreak. The United States was paying nearly $500 million annually, significantly more than China's contribution. I ended this relationship, but Biden rejoined without negotiations, pushing for a pandemic treaty that could compromise U.S. sovereignty and promote censorship on public health issues. Under my next administration, that treaty will be terminated, and the U.S. will withdraw from the WHO, which failed during the pandemic. I aim to create a new coalition focused on health while preserving national sovereignty. I had the opportunity to renegotiate a lower fee to rejoin the WHO, but Biden chose the higher amount. This is just one example of the many issues facing our country. Thank you.

We cannot defeat the epidemic alone, but the UN's approach is misdirected. It attempts both too little and too much. It exceeds the UN's proper role while ignoring the most pressing health issues, and that's why The United States will reject it. The WHO cannot claim credibility or leadership until it undergoes radical reform. The United States objects to the political declaration of noncommunicable diseases. Member states decided earlier this year that this meeting should approve a declaration in advance by consensus to ensure this gathering would not be marred by controversy, but the declaration is filled with controversy with provisions about everything from taxes to oppressive management entered by international bodies of communicable diseases. The draft declaration before us today should not have been included in today's agenda. The United States will walk away from the declaration.

The speaker discusses the World Health Organization (WHO) and its current state. They believe that the WHO has lost its way and is attempting to gain power by declaring pandemics and imposing healthcare policies on member nations. The speaker plans to negotiate with the WHO and defund it if necessary. They criticize the WHO for being influenced by China, Davos, the pharmaceutical industry, and the big ag industry. The speaker believes that the WHO should focus on supporting local health clinics, agriculture, economic development, and clean water. They also express concerns about the safety and effectiveness of vaccines, citing a study that shows girls who take the DTP vaccine are more likely to die from other causes. The speaker emphasizes the need for thorough testing and understanding of pharmaceutical products before mandating their use.

Two weeks ago, I signed an executive order announcing the United States' withdrawal from the W.H.O. This decision is due to the W.H.O.'s mishandling of the COVID-19 pandemic and other global health crises. We declared a public health emergency of international concern. From the moment we detected viral pneumonia in Wuhan, we requested more information, activated emergency systems, alerted the world, convened global experts, and published comprehensive guidance for countries on protecting their populations and health systems. This all happened before the first death was reported in China on January 11, 2020. Many nations face economic difficulties, and the US announcement has intensified this situation.

The World Health Organization (WHO) is facing criticism for its push to extend its powers and control over countries and people's self-determination. An independent evaluation will be conducted to review pandemic preparedness and response. The WHO's proposed pandemic treaty and international health regulations have raised concerns about its authority over health decisions, including vaccines, treatments, and surveillance. The treaty could impose restrictions, lockdowns, and experimental treatments without respecting human rights. The WHO claims absolute leadership in all health matters, but some argue that this level of authority has never been seen before. Supporters argue that these measures are necessary to protect the global population. The final vote on these agreements will take place in May 2024.

The World Health Organization (WHO) is facing criticism for seeking to extend its powers and control over countries and people's self-determination. The WHO's reform process, initiated after the COVID-19 crisis, aims to bring significant changes that will affect all member states. The organization is pushing for a pandemic treaty that would grant it authority over health decisions, including vaccines, treatments, and restrictions. Critics argue that the WHO has failed in its response to the pandemic and should not be given more power. The treaty, if approved, would be binding and could restrict individual liberties. Citizens are urged to pressure their political representatives to oppose these measures.

The HHS Secretary, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., is addressing controversial WHO amendments to international health regulations (IHR) that establish a framework for managing global public health events. The US is rejecting these amendments due to concerns about national sovereignty, as the regulations could grant an unelected international organization power over health emergencies, potentially leading to lockdowns and travel restrictions. The agreement bypasses the US Senate and employs broad language, enabling the WHO to implement unified public messaging, raising fears of censorship. Provisions regarding health IDs, vaccine passports, and a centralized medical database could lead to global medical surveillance. The WHO's failures during COVID, including its handling of China's actions, further fuel concerns. Rejecting the amendments aims to strengthen national autonomy and prevent a technocratic control system that uses health risks to curtail freedoms. While the regulations may have been written with good intentions, they represent a step in the wrong direction. This rejection is not a rejection of international cooperation, but a commitment to protecting civil liberties, the Constitution, and American sovereignty.

A small group of conspirators has manipulated global health organizations for profit, leading to widespread harm. The World Health Organization (WHO) has operated as a criminal cartel since its inception, prioritizing control and profit over public health. They employ a four-step process: planning, funding, creating rationale, and profiting from their actions. Evidence suggests that the WHO and its partners have engaged in unethical practices, including harmful vaccine trials. The funding structure, heavily reliant on the Gates Foundation, raises legal concerns. The narrative surrounding pandemics has been manipulated to instill fear and drive acceptance of vaccines. This situation is characterized as organized crime, requiring a reevaluation of the WHO's role and a call for its dismantlement rather than mere reform. The focus should be on addressing the criminal actions rather than debating public health measures.

The WHO Pandemic Preparedness Treaty gives the WHO excessive power, potentially undermining America's interests. We must prevent President Biden from signing it to protect our constitution and sovereignty. Research this issue and stand against international bureaucrats and their Davos allies. We, the people, still hold the power to resist.

The World Health Organization (WHO) is facing criticism for seeking to expand its powers and control over countries and people's self-determination. An independent evaluation will be conducted to improve pandemic preparedness, but the WHO's track record has raised doubts about its ability to handle such responsibilities. The WHO's proposed pandemic treaty aims to gain authority over health decisions of UN member nations, including vaccine mandates and distribution. Concerns have been raised about the lack of transparency in the decision-making process and the potential infringement on human rights. Citizens are urged to pressure their political representatives to ensure accountability and prevent the WHO from gaining unchecked power.

The speakers discuss the achievements of the World Health Organization (WHO) in the past two years. They mention that the WHO is passing amendments to international health regulations, which member countries must actively opt out of to avoid accepting them. They express concern about the power given to the WHO's director general during a pandemic, as they can decide what actions to take. The speakers also mention that the definition of a pandemic has been changed, potentially leading to a situation where even a small number of cases in different countries could be classified as a pandemic. This would allow the WHO to seize governing powers of member states.

The WHO's new treaty and amendments are causing concern as they could potentially seize governing powers during a pandemic. This unelected body, funded by billionaires, could dictate when people can leave their homes, wear masks, and receive mRNA shots. It is seen as undemocratic and not in the best interest of the people. The United States government proposed changes to the treaty, but most were withdrawn due to public outrage. However, the WHO continues to pursue their agenda, finding alternative methods to achieve their goals.

The World Health Organization (WHO) is facing criticism for seeking to extend its powers and control over countries and people's self-determination. The WHO's reform process, initiated after the COVID-19 crisis, aims to bring significant changes that will affect all 194 member states. They are proposing a pandemic treaty that would give them authority over health decisions and the power to impose restrictions, lockdowns, and experimental treatments. Critics argue that the WHO has failed in the past and should not be granted more power. The treaty is set to be voted on in May 2024, and citizens are urged to pressure their political representatives to oppose it.

The speaker criticizes the World Health Organization (WHO), claiming it is corrupt and controlled by China. They highlight how the US paid a significant amount to the WHO while China paid much less. The speaker mentions terminating America's relationship with the WHO and criticizes Joe Biden for reentering without negotiations or reforms. They express concern about a proposed pandemic treaty that would require the US to send medical supplies and promote censorship. The speaker pledges to withdraw from the WHO and replace it with a new coalition of nations committed to health and sovereignty. They also mention a missed opportunity to renegotiate the WHO deal for a lower cost.

The World Health Organization is allegedly attempting a global power grab to become a global ministry of health with divisions like the FDA and CDC. The WHO's definition of health encompasses every area of life, including climate, animals, and the environment via "One Health." According to the speaker, the head of the WHO, Tedros Ghebreyesus, considers climate change, racism, and gun violence to be public health emergencies. If these are public health emergencies, every area of life would fall under the WHO's control. The WHO adopted amendments to the international health regulations and intends to push through an international pandemic treaty by the end of the year or May 2025. They will allegedly continue until humanity says no.

The speaker criticizes the World Health Organization (WHO), claiming it is corrupt and controlled by China. They highlight that the US paid almost $500 million to the WHO while China paid only $40 million. The speaker mentions terminating America's relationship with the WHO and accuses Joe Biden of reentering without negotiations or reforms. They express concern about a proposed pandemic treaty that would require the US to send medical supplies to other countries and censor free speech. The speaker pledges to withdraw from the WHO, abolish and replace it, and form a new coalition of nations committed to health and sovereignty. They also mention a missed opportunity to renegotiate the deal with the WHO for a lower cost.

The speaker criticizes the World Health Organization (WHO) for its lack of accountability and the influence of pharmaceutical companies. They argue that proposed regulations would give the WHO more power, including the ability to make binding recommendations and enforce financial contributions from countries for pandemic response. The regulations could also require the sharing of intellectual property, mandate vaccine production and international sharing, and override national safety approval processes. Another speaker highlights the agility of the UK's response to COVID-19 after leaving the European Union and suggests it as a model for the future. The speaker warns that the WHO's powers could include ordering border closures, travel restrictions, contact tracing, forced quarantining, medical examinations, proof of vaccination, and forced medication, even in potential emergencies.

I expressed skepticism towards the World Health Organization's ability to handle a global pandemic due to past errors and conflicts of interest. While we can assist other countries, we must not give up our sovereignty or agree to a lockdown charter. In emergencies, governments may feel pressured to make harmful decisions. Therefore, I believe that no pandemic treaty is preferable to a flawed one.