reSee.it - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0 states: I just call them Frankenshots. If you study it, the technology here, the mRNA technology, came out of the Pentagon. They the Pentagon were the people who financed these Nazi COVID Frankenshots, and they were involved in the development of them. So it's certainly my belief and the belief of the people in Florida that they have to be withdrawn from the market, prohibited, and and destroyed. They're they're just too dangerous for people. You can see Pele if you just click on the Internet. All of the adverse reactions among people and deaths that are, occurring, all the time. In fact, right at the very beginning of the pandemic, based on my, experience dealing with biological warfare weapons and their so called vaccines, frankinchots, I said quite clearly that anything that big pharma came up with that set as a that they said would be a vaccine was would be more dangerous than useless.

The speaker, who has experience in the morbidity mortality business and international law, discusses a lawsuit against the Department of Defense (DoD) regarding COVID-19 vaccine mandates. They claim that the shots contain pathogens, including Marburg, and that the lipid nanoparticles in the vaccines can be activated by an 18 gigahertz signal, causing a Marburg epidemic. They also mention the 1P36 gene deletion, which they believe can turn vaccinated individuals into zombies. The speaker urges people not to go to FEMA camps and shares information about therapeutic drugs and preparations to treat Marburg. They express concerns about the erosion of constitutional rights and the potential for enemy occupiers to take over the country.

The Republican Party leaders in Brevard County are set to call for an immediate ban on mRNA COVID vaccines, viewing them as a biological weapon. The executive committee is expected to vote on this proposal shortly. If approved, they will urge state leaders to make it illegal to administer or receive these vaccines in Florida. Their four-page letter, which includes references, outlines the reasoning behind their stance.

The vaccine is back in the news as Republican leaders in Brevard County are set to call for an immediate ban on mRNA COVID vaccines. The executive committee believes these vaccines are a biological weapon. They are expected to vote on a letter asking state leaders to make it illegal to administer or receive mRNA vaccines in Florida. The four-page letter includes citations that support their claims, and the vote is anticipated to pass.

Pursuant to 28 USC seventeen forty six, I, Joseph Sanson, declare under penalty of perjury that the following statement is true to the best of my knowledge. I'm a psychotherapist with a bachelor's degree in psychology, a master's degree in clinical mental health counseling, and a PhD in psychology. I've been litigating here in Florida for over a year and a half to get the mRNA nanoparticle injections off the market because they're biological and technological weapons of mass destruction. In violation of Florida Statute 790.166, 18 USC 175 Chapter 10 Biological Weapons, as well as the Biological Weapons Convention, of course. I filed an affidavit in my case from Doctor. Francis Boyle, the law professor that wrote the Biological Weapons and Anti Terrorism Act of 1989. Doctor. Francis Boyle was arguably the world's leading legal authority on biological weapons. Doctor. Boyle clearly states in his affidavit that COVID injections and MRI nanoparticle injections are in violation of Florida Statute 790.166, Weapons of Mass Destruction, as well as 18 USC 175, Chapter 10, biological weapons. Keep in mind that the Biological Weapons and Anti Terrorism Act of 1989 was The US domestic implementation of the Biological Weapons Convention. I certify the authenticity of doctor Francis Boyle's affidavit as well as his intention to testify in this case that the COVID injections and and mRNA injections are biological weapons and weapons of mass destruction.

The Brevard County GOP is planning to call on state leaders to ban mRNA-based COVID vaccines, claiming they are biological weapons. They believe government agencies, media, tech companies, and corporations have committed fraud by promoting the safety and effectiveness of these vaccines. The party's letter, which is yet to be sent, will be accompanied by evidence supporting their claims. This request coincides with a grand jury investigation into the vaccines, initiated by Governor DeSantis. The investigation aims to determine if pharmaceutical companies are involved in any wrongdoing.

The COVID injections are labeled as biological weapons and weapons of mass destruction by top law professor Dr. Francis Boyle. An emergency petition in Florida calls for a halt to distribution and confiscation of existing supplies. The case includes evidence from legal and biotech experts, claiming violations of biological weapons laws and more. Dr. Boyle's credentials support his assertion. The Florida Supreme Court approved an investigation into COVID injection manufacturers, and the 9th Circuit Court ruled the mRNA injection is not a vaccine. The Wellness Company offers medical emergency kits with life-saving medications for various health crises. Visit twc.healthforward/blackout and use promo code blackout for a discount.

The COVID vaccines are deemed biological weapons by law professor Dr. Francis Boyle in a recent affidavit. The affidavit argues that the mRNA vaccines violate various laws, including those on biological weapons and treason. Cases of rapid onset cancers and deaths post-vaccination are highlighted, urging viewers to be prepared with emergency medical kits. The video emphasizes the importance of staying informed and ready to fight infections. The speaker encourages viewers to subscribe to their channels for more updates.

The vaccine is back in the news as Republican leaders in Brevard County are set to call for an immediate ban on mRNA-based COVID vaccines. The Brevard GOP executive committee believes these vaccines are a biological weapon. They are expected to vote on a letter requesting state leaders to make it illegal to administer or receive mRNA vaccines in Florida. The letter, which includes citations, outlines their reasoning and is likely to pass during the upcoming vote.

Checklist for summary approach: - Identify and restate the speaker’s claimed credentials (or lack thereof). - Capture the core activity described (deposing leading vaccine experts) and the basis for claims (actual evidence). - Note the courtroom principle contrasting titles versus evidence. - Outline the asserted strategic actions (legal action against specific agencies) and purported results. - Preserve the exact claim about the outcome of the lawsuits regarding vaccine safety science. - Present statements verbatim where feasible, and otherwise closely paraphrase to retain meaning. - Avoid adding judgments, external context, or evaluative commentary. Summary: The speaker introduces himself as Mister Siri and immediately clarifies that he is not a medical doctor, and not an immunologist or biologist or any kind of vaccinologist. He adds that despite lacking these titles, he “depose[s] them regularly, including the world’s leading ones with regards to vaccines,” and that he must base his claims on “actual evidence.” In describing his courtroom approach, he asserts that when he goes to court regarding vaccines, “I don’t get to rely on titles.” He then recounts a proposed strategic path he characterizes as a “genius way forward”: “We’re gonna sue the government agencies, HHS, FDA, NIH,” and he states that “we started winning.” The narrative then turns to the alleged outcomes of those legal actions, posing the question, “And what did we prove in those lawsuits?” followed by the claimed conclusion: “That the entire science behind vaccine safety was nothing but a complete fraud.” Throughout, the speaker frames the process as a shift from deference to credentials to a reliance on evidence obtained through deposition and litigation, culminating in purported victories against major federal health agencies. He presents the lawsuits as the mechanism by which the foundational science of vaccine safety was challenged, and he asserts that the result of these proceedings is a definitive statement that the science underpinning vaccine safety is fraudulent, as claimed within the transcript’s courtroom-centered account. The emphasis remains on the contrast between claimed authority and evidence-based legal challenges, as well as on the asserted procedural successes and the sweeping conclusion about vaccine-safety science.

- The mRNA on plasmids was produced, and after processing, much DNA from plasmids remained; Kevin MacKinnon found that vials were full of plasmid DNA, the whole plasmid and parts of it, and this was published. Authorities claimed it doesn’t matter and that vaccines have saved millions of lives, so why not have some DNA in them. - The DNA in the vaccine vials was packaged in lipid nanoparticles and was shown by colleagues last year (the INMODIA publication) to enter human cells in culture and remain stable in cells for days, as did the mRNA. Despite this, the message given was to poof, never mind, don’t worry, be happy. - A radical change occurred due to a discovery by Kevin MacKinnon three weeks ago: during transcription on the chromosome, byproducts are generated; some mRNA strands do not detach from the DNA where they’re formed, creating hybrids of DNA and RNA that come off together. These hybrids are dangerous. - In cells, an enzyme called RNase H takes care of these sparks and extinguishes them immediately; otherwise they can cause damage to the chromosome, potentially lighting “fires” on the chromosomes. If not extinguished, the fires can cause diverse damage depending on where they occur, potentially leading to illnesses described in medical textbooks, including tumors (neoplastic disease), autoimmune disease, developmental impairment, birth defects, or death. - The speaker asserts these hybrids and their mishandling could lead to a broad range of illnesses, and emphasizes that this situation is not limited to the COVID vaccine but applies to all Moderna RNA vaccines, including new Moderna RNA vaccines entering the market, such as a flu vaccine, and mentions veterinary RNA vaccines as well. - The claim is made that these vaccines will be heavily contaminated with deadly dangerous hybrids, and it is the duty of authorities and controlling authorities to stop proceeding and not turn away; otherwise they will face court for not fulfilling their duties. The speaker has been giving interviews and asserts this narrative is spreading worldwide, framing it as akin to attempted murder and urging physicians to refuse vaccination.

The discussion centers on a Dutch civil litigation in which Bill Gates, Albert Bourla, and Marc Rutemp (Marc Rutza) are named as individual defendants in cases linked to “Project COVID” and broad pandemic preparedness efforts years before the 2020 pandemic. Key facts asserted: - The defendants are plaintiffs in civil tort litigation filed in the Netherlands around 2023. Two cases exist: an older 2023 case and a second case involving additional plaintiffs. The Dutch approach allows individuals to be named as defendants in civil tort actions. - Gates and Bourla (and Rutza) have appeared as defendants; Gates attempted to avoid jurisdiction, but the Amsterdam court ruled that Gates and Bourla, as individuals, respond to the case. They have not appeared in court personally, but their lawyers appear on their behalf. - On March 9, an appeal hearing occurred in Amsterdam at the Court of Appeals, with extensive public attendance (about 60 journalists, podcasters, and plaintiffs). The hearing was described as explosive; a single attorney, Peter Stassen, presented a long argument as co-counsel had been imprisoned and disbarred, leaving one attorney on a tight budget. A video of the proceedings and a standout speech went viral. - The plaintiffs allege the defendants conspired to create “Project COVID” and a “pandemic preparedness racket” years prior to 2020. The core claim is that Gates, Bourla, Rutza, along with others, collaborated with private NGOs, the military, NATO, and DOD through a DARPA-linked pandemic program to identify pandemic potential viruses and to develop vaccines and therapeutics within sixty days, with funding from the DOD. - Evidence cited includes a 2017 AstraZeneca tape in which a key AstraZeneca executive states that DARPA approached them in 2017 to join a consortium to identify pandemic viruses and deliver vaccines within sixty days; the response was, “I thought it was science fiction.” The tape is part of an evidence package showing pre-2020 planning. - February 4, 2020 is highlighted as a crucial date: a telephone call from DARPA indicating COVID was declared a national security threat, followed by retroactive emergency declarations around March 2020. A February 4, 2020 conference was scheduled, with widespread communications among government, military, HHS, and CDC; the aim was to secure liability protection for pharmaceutical countermeasures during a declared emergency. - The defense includes the assertion that the public-private partnership extended to many companies (including 300 others) that joined the consortium, with U.S. and European regulatory synchronization through mutual recognition agreements. - The alleged motives are primarily framed as profits and control, with references to a long-standing history of military involvement in vaccine development and public health measures, including the PREP Act in the U.S. and parallel European countermeasures frameworks that waive liability and regulatory requirements during declared emergencies. The PREP Act’s role — especially in the U.S. — is discussed as shielding manufacturers from liability, with European frameworks described as allowing similar protections through contracts and synchronized countermeasures legislation. - Expert testimonies: five experts have provided evidence supporting foreknowledge and intentional deception by government health officials and the named defendants. Sasha Ladopova and Catherine Watt contributed written testimonies; Ladopova references foreknowledge by health regulators, and the broader regulatory harmonization across EMA and FDA. - Francis Boyle, a professor known for work on bioweapons law, testified that the vaccines/metas could be viewed as bioweapons; he died three weeks after agreeing to testify. - Injuries to plaintiffs: in the initial case, seven injured plaintiffs with one death; the second case added three more plaintiffs. Injuries cited include cardiovascular inflammation, autoimmune conditions, and cancer; plaintiffs contend their lives were destroyed by the countermeasures, while regulators and manufacturers allegedly denied injuries and deaths. What happens next: - An October 22 hearing in the lower court in Lewarden (The Netherlands) is planned, with a public in-person event and a press conference. - The appeal on the second case seeks to have expert witnesses heard under oath; the prior lower court denied this, and the higher court’s decision is anticipated (with expectations of denial, according to the interview). - The campaign invites public interest and financial support; the foundation in the Netherlands funds the case, and the English-language YouTube channel is available for updates and evidence. Contact points for following the case include Sasha Ladopova’s Substack and the Dutch foundation’s YouTube channel and materials.

Speaker 0 presents the statement of Joseph Sanson, based on the sworn statement of the late professor doctor Francis Boyle, described as the greatest authority in bioweapons legislation and the author of it. Boyle is asserted to have concluded that the COVID-19 mRNA injection is a bioweapon, and that he knew this “like no other” before his death, which occurred shortly after he declared willingness to testify under oath in court. The core of Boyle’s argument, as presented, is that the COVID-19 mRNA injections contain derivatives of illegal military gene function research, and therefore qualify by definition as a military biological weapon system—a bioweapon. This bioweapon is said to consist of two integrated components: a pathogenic load and a delivery mechanism. It is asserted that the pathogenic load results from illegal gene or function research. Boyle is described as referring to an article in Nature Medicine, with a link included in the plea note. If opened, the article is claimed to warn that true scientists believe an animal is the most likely source of the coronavirus, and that what is called the “new normal” are not scientists but faith fanatics. The 2015 Nature Medicine article is summarized as reporting that, based on findings, researchers synthetically created an infectious fully SHC014 recombinant virus with robust viral replication in vitro and in vivo, a SARS-like coronavirus with a spike protein optimized for human infection. The article is attributed to researchers including those affiliated with UNC Chapel Hill and the Wuhan Institute of Virology, implying that the spike protein and pathogenic payload were the result of illegal gain-of-function research. The spike protein mRNA is described as providing instructions to human cells to produce this pathogenic spike protein, emphasized as not being a natural spike protein but an illegally developed, synthetically made pathogen optimized for human infection. The delivery system is identified as nanolipid particles (NLPs) that encapsulate the mRNA payload and deliver it into cells. The rhetoric labels these as fat globules, and Boyle is said to declare that this is actually a nanotechnology-enhanced delivery platform. This technology is described as being paid for, developed, financed, and conceived by the Pentagon and its research institute DARPA, with the claim that the virus was aerosolized and engineered with nanotechnology from the beginning, indicating a long-term program for advanced delivery systems. The claim is made that this technology has been used in the COVID-19 injections, with the NLP delivery system described as the result of a specific teacher-sponsored program for nanotechnological biological weapons. The presentation by Samsung is cited for further legal implications, and it is argued that Gates and Borla qualify as suspects of crimes against humanity under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.

Speaker 0 discusses Dr. Francis Boyle as a highly distinguished human rights lawyer who worked at the highest levels of global treaties and advocacy, and who wrote the bioweapons treaty governing the United States. Boyle is described as having intimate knowledge of what a bioweapon is, what it does, and what it looks like. Early in the COVID-19 period, Boyle is said to have stated that COVID and the vaccine are bioweapons, echoing similar points made by others about their similar structures and common origins. The speaker notes Boyle warned the world that this is a bioweapon and cites Boyle’s status as a powerful voice on the matter. The speaker recalls an interview conducted in 2023 or 2024 with Boyle, describing him as deeply knowledgeable and brave, and asserts that the interview should have been front-page news. The speaker quotes Boyle as saying publicly that the virus and the vaccine are bioweapons and that their goal is to depopulate, disable, and kill. The speaker paraphrases Boyle’s words to emphasize that the aim is to disrupt reproduction and to disable and to kill, asserting that Boyle’s statements connected these outcomes to the design of the bioweapons. Boyle died in January, described as dying suddenly while being in good health and active in his early seventies. The speaker notes Sasha Ladopova’s claim that there is a problem with Boyle’s death, while avoiding speculation about the specifics, and states that Boyle was intended to be one of five witnesses slated to testify in a Netherlands trial against Pfizer, Albert Bourla, and Bill Gates regarding depopulation, disabling, and murdering people with the injection. Sasha Ladopova is reported as expressing concern about Boyle’s death and its timing, though the speaker declines to elaborate further, citing respect for the family’s privacy and avoiding baseless speculation. The transcript adds that the lawyer who would lead the prosecution in the same Netherlands context was arrested and detained under severe circumstances, highlighting a dramatic intervention that the speaker says does not align with the rule of law and due process in the Netherlands. The speaker closes by noting Boyle’s exceptional character and expressing a sense of great loss. Speaker 1 then warns listeners to be cautious about trusting Sasha Ladopova and Naomi Wolf, advising that if something is hard to swallow, one should pay attention, stating that these two individuals should be questioned at one's own peril. The speaker asserts personal familiarity with both women and urges listeners to recognize potential risks in accepting their reporting.

Fauci, George Soros, Bill Gates, and Mark Zuckerberg should be arrested for their role in the "greatest mass poisoning in human history" via COVID-19 vaccines. The COVID-19 vaccines are "unsafe and defective" and have poisoned nearly six billion people around the world. These "fake vaccine gene editing, immune damaging, sterilizing, and potentially lethal injections" are "straight up poison." There needs to be a global ban on the spike protein because "they're gonna try to put it in our food next."

The COVID-19 mRNA injections have been described as dangerous, with claims that they increase the likelihood of contracting COVID and cause severe health issues, including myocarditis, blood clots, and even death. Doctor Francis Boyle, who drafted the Biological Weapons Anti-Terrorism Act, has labeled these injections as bioweapons. Studies indicate that the more doses received, the higher the risk of adverse effects, including long COVID and increased mortality. Reports from healthcare professionals highlight alarming trends in vaccine-related injuries and deaths. Whistleblowers have shared personal accounts of severe complications following vaccination, including paralysis and miscarriages. Additionally, there are concerns about the injections' impact on reproductive health and potential long-term effects, with some suggesting a deliberate intent to harm the population. The military's involvement in vaccine development and distribution raises further questions about the motives behind the rollout.

Florida plans to end all state vaccine mandates, including for schools. It actually means for you to voluntarily agree, only mandatory once you agree to do it. the grand jury finds no criminal activity related to the COVID vaccines. a state health officer may use any means necessary to vaccinate or treat the individual, using the law enforcement to rip you out of the house and vaccinate you. Ronnie DeSantis is for genocides. if you type in died suddenly into Google, you'll find all the people who continuously keep dropping since 2020, since they've rolled out all these toxins and injections. 1986 Reagan Act. 1986, Reagan decided to pass a bill to protect all the vaccine companies from lawsuits. They've been doing this since 1626, and here's two books to read so you can realize how all signs are controlled.

I am a toxicology expert who has worked on designing experimental molecules for medicines. Based on my expertise, I firmly believe that the materials used in these vaccines were intentionally designed to cause harm, injury, and reduce fertility. I will be presenting this argument in court soon. Therefore, I strongly advise against taking these injectables or any future mRNA-based materials as they are all dangerous. Additionally, we have all been deceived from the beginning, as there was never a true pandemic or public health emergency. The media and unreliable diagnostic tests have spread lies and propaganda.

This week, rumors emerged about potential pardons for figures like Fauci and Daszak amid the conclusion of a two-year investigation into the COVID-19 pandemic, which implicated the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Doctor Joseph Sansone has filed a lawsuit in Florida seeking to prohibit mRNA nanoparticle injections, labeling them as biological weapons and arguing they violate state laws. He aims to gather expert affidavits to support his case and emphasizes the need for accountability. Sansone argues for bodily autonomy and public health safety, asserting that these injections pose significant risks. He encourages public support for the case and calls for independent media coverage, as mainstream outlets have largely ignored the issue. The Florida Department of Health has previously deemed these injections unsafe, reinforcing Sansone's legal stance.

Brevard County's GOP leaders are planning to call on the governor and state leaders to ban mRNA-based COVID vaccines, claiming they are biological weapons. They are set to vote on this issue, and if it passes, they will ask for the vaccines to be made illegal in Florida. The Republicans cite sources in a letter, alleging fraud by government agencies, media, tech companies, and corporations regarding the safety and effectiveness of the vaccines. At the same time, a grand jury requested by Governor DeSantis is investigating the vaccines for potential legal violations. While the federal government is urging drug companies to make the vaccines more affordable and accessible, the support for the GOP's ban is significant.

**Bahasa Melayu:** Penceramah berkongsi pengalamannya sebagai penasihat WHO dan pengetahuannya tentang vaksin. Beliau mendakwa telah memberi amaran tentang vaksin COVID-19 sebelum ia dikeluarkan, tetapi disenyapkan. Beliau mencadangkan alternatif seperti ivermectin, tetapi juga disekat. Isu COVID-19 digunakan untuk agenda lain, dengan vaksin sebagai fokus utama. Vaksin mRNA yang digunakan berbeza daripada vaksin tradisional dan dipromosikan secara agresif walaupun terdapat kesan sampingan. Pakar tempatan dan tokoh agama digunakan untuk mempromosikan vaksin, manakala pandangan alternatif disenyapkan. FDA digunakan sebagai sandaran untuk kelulusan vaksin kecemasan, walaupun terdapat pilihan rawatan lain. Maklumat yang salah disebarkan melalui media, dan percubaan untuk berkongsi maklumat alternatif disekat. Rakyat disogok untuk mengambil vaksin dan booster. Beliau mendakwa tiada bukti vaksin menyelamatkan nyawa, tetapi banyak bukti kesan buruk. Vaksin COVID-19 sebenarnya adalah terapi gen yang mengubah genetik manusia, menyebabkan pelbagai masalah kesihatan. Beliau menggesa orang ramai untuk tidak panik tentang virus dan fokus pada meningkatkan sistem imun. **English Translation:** The speaker shared his experience as a WHO advisor and his knowledge of vaccines. He claimed to have warned about the COVID-19 vaccine before its release but was silenced. He suggested alternatives like ivermectin but was also blocked. The COVID-19 issue was used for other agendas, with the vaccine as the main focus. The mRNA vaccines used differ from traditional vaccines and were aggressively promoted despite side effects. Local experts and religious figures were used to promote the vaccine, while alternative views were silenced. The FDA was used as a backup for emergency vaccine approval, even though other treatment options existed. Misinformation was spread through the media, and attempts to share alternative information were blocked. People were bribed to take vaccines and boosters. He claimed there is no evidence that vaccines save lives, but plenty of evidence of adverse effects. The COVID-19 vaccine is actually gene therapy that alters human genetics, causing various health problems. He urged people not to panic about the virus and focus on boosting their immune systems.

Just 2 weeks ago, Professor Francis Boyle issued an affidavit stating that mRNA COVID vaccines are bioweapons. He claims Croatians have unknowingly delivered weapons of mass destruction to their people. Boyle, a respected lawyer who drafted bioweapons laws in 1989, urges action to investigate. Failure to do so is the people's own fault.

In Florida, there is a push to ban the mRNA COVID vaccines, which are referred to as "Franken shots" due to safety concerns. The speaker believes these vaccines are dangerous and should be removed from the market. They claim the technology behind the vaccines came from the Pentagon and point to adverse reactions and deaths as evidence. The speaker predicted early on that these vaccines would be harmful, as discussed in their book "Resisting Medical Tyranny." They warn of a looming humanitarian crisis due to the vaccines.

Dr. Joseph Sanson, a Florida psychotherapist and licensed mental health counselor who litigates pro se, contends that the COVID-19 mRNA injections are biological and technological weapons of mass destruction and argues Florida should stop facilitating these injections and related products. He frames his effort as part of a broader effort to stop what he calls a bioweapon program tied to the pandemic. Background and filings - Sanson began in May 2021, working about 18 months to pass a band of jab resolution at the county level declaring mRNA COVID injections to be biological and technological weapons of mass destruction and urging action by the governor and attorney general. He claims that he got these resolutions passed in about 10 Florida counties, in Idaho, and in Arizona, and that they influenced the Florida Surgeon General to call for a halt to injections in early 2024. - He notes that the Florida Department of Health has said these mRNA injections are unsafe for humans and a potential threat to the human genome. - On 04/01/2023, while advancing these resolutions, Sanson says he suffered congestive heart failure and later underwent a triple bypass on 04/10/2023. He says he tried to rely on unvaccinated blood for surgery and consulted Dr. Francis Boyle, who helped endorse his band-and-jab resolution. Boyle is described as the author of the U.S. domestic implementation legislation for the Biological Weapons Convention; Boyle died about two months after Sanson filed his December 2024 case, which Sanson says prejudiced his case. - Sanson’s first mandamus filing claimed the governor and attorney general were violating Florida statute 797.166 (as he asserts). The court found the writ of mandamus improper (ministerial duty limit) and he lost the appeal. Second case and remedies sought - On 12/01/2024 Sanson filed a second case seeking an injunction and declaratory relief, arguing that his April 2023 medical events and exposures were the result of involuntary environmental exposure through shedding of the technology in the injections. - He characterizes his hospital stay, the decision to obtain unvaccinated blood, and Boyle’s involvement as part of this exposure theory. He says the case includes an 80-page complaint with 50–64 pages of affidavits, including nine affidavits up front and two more recently. - One key affidavit is from Francis Boyle, whose affidavit is described as not only expert legal opinion but legislative intent, given Boyle’s role in crafting the U.S. domestic implementation legislation for the biological weapons conventions. - The World Council for Health in Florida endorsed Sanson’s bill, and a 2025 paper titled COVID-19 Harms and Damages (COVID-19 harms and damages, non-exhaustive conclusion) is cited as stating that both the virus and the vaccine violated the Biological Weapons Convention; the paper has 11 coauthors, including doctors Villa, Zivjic, McCullough, and Maverkakis. Evidence and theory of harm - Sanson cites studies and affidavits suggesting shedding of the mRNA technology, transmission to unvaccinated individuals (including women), and possible environmental exposure from intimate contact or proximity. He references an Israeli study showing transmission of mRNA components to unvaccinated women and notes reports of menstrual-cycle interference and other immune effects. - He argues that involuntary environmental exposure through shedding constitutes a dangerous threat warranting injunctive relief under Florida Health Freedom Act and Civil Rights Act, as well as constitutional protections. He contends the Florida Surgeon General’s statements and the 2025 paper support these positions. - He also argues that the vaccines are illegal gain-of-function products, with derivatives of the spike protein present in injections, demonstrating specific intent; he cites Boyle’s arguments on gain-of-function, dual-use technology, and knowingness. He invokes malice of forethought (reckless disregard for human life) and informed consent issues, arguing there was zero informed consent for a bioweapon. Legal strategy and procedural posture - Sanson says his strongest immediate legal avenue is the Health Freedom Act, along with Civil Rights Act and constitutional provisions, rather than relying on the Weapons of Mass Destruction statute alone, which he dropped in an amended complaint. He argues the illness and exposure could violate civil and constitutional rights and that discovery is needed to develop evidence. - He claims the defense has not adequately addressed the merits, focusing on procedural arguments. He asserts there are procedural errors and seeks a new judge and evidentiary development, including testimony from multiple experts (Villa, Zeviets, Mihalchia) and the Surgeon General Ladapo under oath. - He has sought to reassign the case to a different judge due to perceived bias and past rulings; he notes the prior judge’s decision in a related whistleblower case against the Surgeon General. The Netherlands case and cross-border dimension - Sanson is involved as a witness in the Netherlands case against Bill Gates and Albert Borla of Pfizer, coordinated by Sasha Ladopova. The Netherlands appellate court limited live testimony, but Sanson has provided written statements and affidavits. A trial hearing in The Netherlands was set for October 22 in the cited case. Next steps - Sanson is pursuing an oral-argument motion for live, livestreamed proceedings; a decision is pending, potentially in September. He hopes for evidentiary development and more cases to challenge the PREP Act and related immunities. - He emphasizes public engagement and urges others to seek cases in other states or countries to push discovery and accountability. Overall, Sanson presents a narrative linking the mRNA vaccines to environmental shedding and alleged bioweapon characteristics, backed by affidavits, peer papers, and testimonies, and seeks injunctive relief in Florida and collaborative proceedings in Europe to halt the use and distribution of the injections.

Republican leaders in Brevard County are poised to call for an immediate ban on mRNA COVID vaccines, labeling them as biological weapons. The executive committee plans to vote on a letter urging state leaders to make these vaccines illegal in Florida. The letter accuses government agencies and corporations of fraudulently claiming the vaccines are safe and effective, citing recent evidence suggesting the vaccines are harmful. If the letter is approved, it will be sent to Tallahassee amid an ongoing grand jury investigation into potential legal violations by pharmaceutical companies regarding the vaccines. Currently, it is illegal to mandate COVID vaccinations in Florida, but this request could further restrict access to mRNA vaccines. Meanwhile, the federal government is encouraging drug companies to make COVID vaccines more affordable and accessible as flu season approaches.