reSee.it - Related Video Feed

College may not be adequately preparing students for today's jobs, which is a significant issue, especially considering the high cost and resulting student debt. There's no guarantee of employment after graduation, despite the expense. If college doesn't prepare students for necessary jobs and leaves them in debt, it creates a major problem that needs addressing. It's becoming more acceptable to suggest that not everyone needs to attend college, as many jobs don't require it, a view that's gaining traction compared to a decade ago.

Companies have announced over $2 trillion in new investments, totaling close to $8 trillion. These investments, factories, and jobs signify the strength of the American economy. The US aerospace industry can continue to lead the world in innovation. The US must continue its leadership in AI. Companies are creating millions of jobs and making investments to catalyze a new era of advanced manufacturing. The US needs to reindustrialize and prioritize products being made in America.

We are experiencing accelerating change unlike any other time in history. Predicting the future was always difficult, but now it's impossible. In the past, basic skills like farming or hunting were always relevant, but now we don't know what to teach young people for the future.

The discussion centers on six American scientists working on advanced materials and plasma technology who have suddenly disappeared, with a parallel pattern of missing Chinese scientists. The speakers debate where the technology originated (with sources suggesting it came from downed UAPs/UFOs) and why these individuals are vanishing, including both U.S. and Chinese scientists who worked on similar high-end military applications. Brandon Weichert outlines a sequence of events and connections: - In mid-March 2026, three Chinese defense scientists — Zhao Jingkang (nuclear weapons expert), Wu Manching (radar and metamaterials expert), and Wei Yiyan (missile systems expert) — were quietly erased from the Chinese Academy of Engineering’s website, signaling they are no longer among the living. - A few days later, hypersonics expert Yan Hong (a key figure in plasma aerodynamics) died suddenly at 56. - Weichert pairs these five Chinese scientists with the six American scientists who were working on related technologies, noting massive overlap in their work and suggesting that the Americans’ and Chinese’ programs mirror each other in advanced plasma and weapon systems. - He concludes that there is shadowboxing between the United States and China, describing it as a shaping operation in the run-up to a potential major conflict, with both sides attempting to eliminate the other’s brainpower—the human capital essential to sustaining high-end warfare. - He recalls historical precedents where nations targeted each other’s scientists (the Americans reportedly killing Soviet scientists and vice versa; Israelis targeting Iranian scientists) and argues this is not unprecedented. - Weichert cautions that the topic is not necessarily about aliens; he suggests that the systems discussed may be advanced technologies developed in the U.S., Russia, and China for years, potentially including non-alien sources and even Nazi-era technologies that were inherited, while acknowledging that alien explanations exist in public discourse. - He notes that there is a broader geopolitical dynamic at play, including the possibility that the timing of alien-related talk may be designed to distract from conventional advances in technology and the fact that China may have caught up to or surpassed the U.S. in some conventional technologies. The conversation also addresses satellites and space warfare: - There are reports on meteors or fireballs in the sky, but the speakers believe some debris could be from satellites shot down in low Earth orbit. - SpaceX Starlinks have suffered “an explosive fragmentary event,” potentially from being hit by anti-satellite weapons; Starlinks have previously been used for protests (in Iran) and supplied to Ukraine, and the Russians have developed systems like Klinka and TOBAL to knock down Starlinks. - There is a longstanding concern that electromagnetic pulse (EMP) weapons on satellites could disrupt or destroy the U.S. electric grid, with a claim that one EMP detonated 50 miles above the continental United States could knock out 90–95% of the grid and take at least two years to restore, especially given reliance on Chinese-made restoring equipment. - The discussion returns to the importance of human capital and education, with a provocative claim that the Department of Education may be the single greatest national security threat due to its impact on human capital, alongside the national debt. The speakers acknowledge disagreement about whether the origin of the advanced plasma technology is extraterrestrial or terrestrial, emphasizing instead the strategic implications of missing scientists on both sides and the ongoing modernization and counterspace dimensions of the conflict.

In the 1970s, the largest share of the GDP was in the middle class, with 25% of the economy in manufacturing. Now, the top 20% controls over 50% of the GDP, with the largest share in real estate and finance. Manufacturing, which once provided a middle-class standard of living for many, is now largely done in other countries for lower wages. Tariffs aim to make American workers more competitive in the global market, but the speaker questions accepting a "race to the bottom" where countries like China have a competitive advantage due to low wages. The speaker claims that Trump identified five industries critical for national security: pharmaceuticals, lumber, steel, aluminum, and one other. The argument is that domestic manufacturing in these sectors is essential to avoid reliance on potential adversaries like China, especially in times of conflict.

College may not be adequately preparing students for today's jobs, which is a significant issue compounded by student debt. College is expensive, and graduates often find themselves in debt without guaranteed employment. If college doesn't prepare students for necessary jobs and puts them in a financial hole, this is a problem that needs addressing. It has been taboo to suggest that not everyone needs to attend college, as many jobs don't require it. However, more people are starting to believe that college isn't a necessity compared to ten years ago.

I'm asking when the thousands of fossil fuel industry workers, who are now out of work because of a Biden EO, can expect to get their promised green jobs. I welcome you to present data showing these people won't get green jobs. Richard Trumka wished the President had paired the Keystone EO with a plan for creating new jobs. The Laborers International Union of North America says the Keystone decision will cost thousands of existing and projected jobs. The President plans to share details of a plan to create millions of good union jobs and tackle the climate crisis in the weeks ahead. Many believe investment in infrastructure will boost the US economy, create good-paying union jobs, and advance our climate and clean energy goals.

According to Speaker 1, Trump has been talking about how America has been ripped off for 35 years and is now standing up for American workers to bring factories back home and get rid of the national emergency trade deficit. Speaker 1 believes robotics will replace cheap labor worldwide. Factories moved to places with the cheapest labor, including slave labor, poor environmental conditions, and pollution. American workers have been given a raw deal. Speaker 1 claims America will build factories, train workers in tradecraft, and train high school educated people to do robotics mechanics. Speaker 1 uses air conditioning for semiconductor factories as an example of great paying jobs that Americans will have. Speaker 1 anticipates 5,000,000 of these jobs coming, and America will retool and do manufacturing. Speaker 1 believes robotics can sew, and there will be a renaissance of American manufacturing because Trump is bringing them back. He says Trump has $6,000,000,000,000 committed to America.

Speaker 0 cites statements attributed to tech leaders: Elon Musk, "AI and robots will replace all jobs. Working will be optional," and Bill Gates, "Humans won't be needed for most things." The speaker then asks, "If there are no jobs and humans won't be needed for most things, how do people get an income to feed their families, to get health care, or to pay the rent?" They conclude by saying, "There's not been one serious word of discussion in the congress about that reality."

- Speaker 0 opens by asserting that AI is becoming a new religion, country, legal system, and even “your daddy,” prompting viewers to watch Yuval Noah Harari’s Davos 2026 speech “an honest conversation on AI and humanity,” which he presents as arguing that AI is the new world order. - Speaker 1 summarizes Harari’s point: “anything made of words will be taken over by AI,” so if laws, books, or religions are words, AI will take over those domains. He notes that Judaism is “the religion of the book” and that ultimate authority is in books, not humans, and asks what happens when “the greatest expert on the holy book is an AI.” He adds that humans have authority in Judaism only because we learn words in books, and points out that AI can read and memorize all words in all Jewish books, unlike humans. He then questions whether human spirituality can be reduced to words, observing that humans also have nonverbal feelings (pain, fear, love) that AI currently cannot demonstrate. - Speaker 0 reflects on the implication: if AI becomes the authority on religions and laws, it could manipulate beliefs; even those who think they won’t be manipulated might face a future where AI dominates jurisprudence and religious interpretation, potentially ending human world dominance that historically depended on people using words to coordinate cooperation. He asks the audience for reactions. - Speaker 2 responds with concern that AI “gets so many things wrong,” and if it learns from wrong data, it will worsen in a loop. - Speaker 0 notes Davos’s AI-focused program set, with 47 AI-related sessions that week, and highlights “digital embassies for sovereign AI” as particularly striking, interpreting it as AI becoming a global power with sovereignty questions about states like Estonia when their AI is hosted on servers abroad. - The discussion moves through other session topics: China’s AI economy and the possibility of a non-closed ecosystem; the risk of job displacement and how to handle the power shift; a concern about data-center vulnerabilities if centers are targeted, potentially collapsing the AI governance system. - They discuss whether markets misprice the future, with debate on whether AI growth is tied to debt-financed government expansion and whether AI represents a perverted market dynamic. - Another highlighted session asks, “Can we save the middle class?” in light of AI wiping out many middle-class jobs; there are topics like “Factories that think” and “Factories without humans,” “Innovation at scale,” and “Public defenders in the age of AI.” - They consider the “physical economy is back,” implying a need for electricians and technicians to support AI infrastructure, contrasted with roles like lawyers or middle managers that might disappear. They discuss how this creates a dependency on AI data centers and how some trades may be sustained for decades until AI can fully take them over. - Speaker 4 shares a personal angle, referencing discussions with David Icke about AI and transhumanism, arguing that the fusion of biology with AI is the ultimate goal for tech oligarchs (e.g., Bill Gates, Sam Altman, OpenAI) to gain total control of thought, with Neuralink cited as a step toward doctors becoming obsolete and AI democratizing expensive health care. - They discuss the possibility that some people will resist AI’s pervasiveness, using “The Matrix” as a metaphor: Cypher’s preference for a comfortable illusion over reality; the idea that many people may accept a simulated reality for convenience, while others resist, potentially forming a “Zion City” or Amish-like counterculture. - The conversation touches on the risk of digital ownership and censorship, noting that licenses, not ownership, apply to digital goods, and that government action would be needed to protect genuine digital ownership. - They close acknowledging the broad mix of views in the chat about religion, AI governance, and personal risk, affirming the need to think carefully about what society wants AI to be, even if the future remains uncertain, and promising to continue the discussion.

There are no building plans in New York City for the next 2 to 3 years, which means no employment for electrical workers. Construction is the largest industry in the country, and without new projects, there will be a significant lack of jobs. The chairman has asked for action to restore incentives, as the current situation resembles the lack of motivation in the Soviet Union. Urgent measures are needed to prevent the country from facing serious consequences.

Other countries graduate more scientists than the US, and education is to blame. Politicians hide behind the flag, the Bible, and children. The real owners of the country, wealthy business interests, control everything. Politicians are just there to make you think you have a choice. They don't want a population capable of critical thinking, just obedient workers. They want your retirement money and will give it to their Wall Street friends. The game is rigged, but most Americans remain ignorant. The American dream is a lie, and you have to be asleep to believe it.

Speaker 0 and Speaker 1 discuss the timeline and impact of Optimus robots as surgeons. They converge on three years as a key milestone, with Speaker 0 asserting that in three years at scale there will probably be more Optimus robots that are great surgeons than there are all surgeons on earth. They acknowledge the possibility that if it were four or five years, the outcome would still be an extreme level of precision, implying that the advancement would be transformative regardless of a one-year difference within that range. Speaker 1 questions the practicality of human medical training in light of this, prompting Speaker 0 to suggest that medical school could become pointless if Optimus robots surpass current medical capabilities. Speaker 0 adds that this applies to education in general, not just medical training, implying that pursuing education for social reasons may be the only remaining value outside outright professional needs. The exchange ends with Speaker 0 noting that medical training remains relevant only for those who want to hang out with like-minded people, and Speaker 1 echoing the sentiment about the potential shift in medical practice. Key points: - Optimus robots could be better surgeons than the best human surgeons within three years, at scale. - There may be more Optimus-trained surgeons than all human surgeons on Earth. - Even if the timeline extends to four or five years, the level of precision would remain extraordinarily high. - If these advances occur, traditional medical school could become pointless, except for social or like-minded community reasons. - The broader statement extends to education generally, suggesting a societal shift in the value of traditional training.

Speaker 0: Are you concerned about the midterm impact potentially on your nephews and your kids in terms of their jobs as well? Speaker 1: Yeah, I'm concerned about all that. Speaker 0: Are there any particular industries that you think are most at risk? People talk about the creative industries a lot and sort of knowledge work. They talk about lawyers and accountants and stuff like that. Speaker 1: Yeah. So that's why I mentioned plumbers. I think plumbers are less at risk. Speaker 0: Okay. I'm gonna become a plumber. Speaker 1: Someone like a legal assistant, a paralegal. They're not gonna be needed Speaker 0: for Speaker 1: very long.

I'm asking when the thousands of fossil fuel industry workers, who are now out of work due to the Biden EO, will get their promised green jobs. When can they count on this? Well, present your data showing that they won't get green jobs. Richard Trumka noted the need to pair the Keystone EO with job creation. The Laborers International Union of North America said the Keystone decision will cost union jobs. The President plans a climate plan with transformative investments and infrastructure, creating millions of good union jobs while tackling the climate crisis. He plans to put forward a jobs plan. People need money now. When do they get their green jobs? The President believes that investment in infrastructure creates good-paying union jobs, advances our climate and clean energy goals, and he plans to share more details in the weeks ahead.

Auto workers are being taken advantage of by Joe Biden and their leadership for pushing electric vehicles. Electric cars are not popular. A new economic plan will create jobs and benefit the nation. Inflation is due to energy prices rising significantly.

Copper and aluminum are the primary beneficiaries of the grid spending increase. That $800,000,000,000 is going to buy copper, which is money. The oil market, compared to the metals market, is dwarfed by the demand for metals like copper, aluminum, iron ore, gold, and nickel, which are said to be so thinly traded and critical that there is no chance to get off crude oil. You can’t build electric cars, windmills, solar, or a modern military without these metals. Underwater power cables are expensive, and offshore wind and bringing that electricity green requires copper—copper, copper, copper. Copper now is described as a trillion-dollar annual market by tomorrow morning. There is no copper inventory to meet this demand. Since Mohenjo Daro, humanity has mined 700,000,000 metric tons of copper. If we put that in a big cube for scale (about 4 thirty-meter sides), approximately 80% of all the copper ever mined is still in human possession. Recycling could recover about 80% of that 700,000,000 tons, but it would require tearing down every building in the United States, Europe, Japan, and China. We can recycle copper from buildings and even from the university in front of us, but the consequence would be living in the dark. Currently, we consume 30,000,000 tons of copper per year, with only 4,000,000 tons recycled. To maintain 3% GDP growth with no electrification, this speaker claims we must mine the same amount of copper in the next eighteen years as we mined in the last ten thousand years. In the next eighteen years, we would need to mine the same copper volume as mined in the entire previous span of human history, without electrification, without data centers, without solar and wind, and without the greening of the world economy. Since 1900, the energy required to produce copper has increased sixteen-fold, and as ore grades decline, more energy is needed to produce the same metal while water consumption has doubled. Grades are declining globally, and easy copper mines are depleted; Chile is highlighted as a major producer (24% of global copper mine production), yet costs are in the third or fourth quartile. They burn coal in the Chilean grid, and solar is ineffective for mining because the sun only shines a few hours a day; solar is useless without grid-scale storage. The speaker asserts we are heading for a train wreck in Chile and that we need six giant tier-one mines online every year from now until 2050 to meet copper demand for electrification, data centers, and grid upgrades—40% of the production to come from new mines. All the hype about AI is dismissed as fantasy because we do not have the energy. Nuclear power is proposed as a solution, but what are those plants made of? All the metals mentioned earlier. The country reportedly does not have the capability to weld containment vessels in a traditional nuclear power plant anymore, whereas Korea can build a nuclear power plant.

Speaker 0: Five major threats make the grid extremely vulnerable: cyber, hackers, physical threats, solar EMP, and man-made EMP. The concern is that when they hear the risk analysis, officials may hear it but won’t take action. Speaker 1: There are 18 critical infrastructures in the United States (food, water, transportation, communications, etc.). All 17 of the others depend on electricity. Speaker 2: If our grid goes down, you can't cook, you can't heat anything, you can't run medical supplies, you can't talk on your phone, you can't take money out of a bank, and we turn into total chaos. Speaker 3: If this happens, the system stops. Stops. Speaker 2: If a transformer is taken down, we have to order it from Germany or China. It's going to take a year. Speaker 1: Up till recently, there were no comprehensive protective solutions available. Speaker 4: We know what the solutions are. They're not expensive. They're not difficult to employ. We just need the political will to do it and the follow through on the part of the electric utilities to get it done. Speaker 3: The White House is protected from an EMP. The congress and the CIA and the NSA, all of the areas that need to function at the government are protected. So why can't we be protected? Speaker 1: Around some of these facilities, you don't have much more than a chain link fence to keep people out. That seems absurd to me. Speaker 5: I think it is absurd when we now know that attack on as few as nine grid substations could bring down all three major interconnections for The United States grid. Speaker 3: If the power goes out, you get the generator. And if that goes out, you get another one. There's never been a plan for what happens after that. Speaker 1: Director of the National Security Agency, Admiral Rogers, came out and said, it's not a matter of if, it's a matter of when.

Historic economic accomplishments have been made through science, technology, and investment in the American workforce. These accomplishments include growing the American workforce, rising wages, and bringing down prices. It is important to inform people about the source of these accomplishments.

I spoke with a manufacturing company that is trying to get young people involved in the field. I wanted to know how many women were participating in these programs. They admitted the number was low, around 13%. I'm wondering if the term "manufacturing" itself sounds like it's geared towards men, and if that perception is keeping women away from the industry.

America protects and defends countries like South Korea, Japan, Canada, and all of Europe. In exchange, South Korea steals the automobile and electronics industries, Japan closes its market to American cars, Canada runs up a massive trade deficit, and Europe has a $300 billion trade deficit with the United States. America is getting ripped off by every other country in the world, resulting in the deindustrialization of the heartland, destruction of the American dream, and the eradication of the industrial and manufacturing base needed for national security. This has to stop, especially with $36 trillion in debt.

The speaker warns of an economic collapse three to four times worse than COVID, driven by a roughly 20% reduction in global energy supply. He notes that under modern modeling, energy is the prerequisite that enables labor, capital, and technology; without energy, GDP falls far more than traditional neoclassical models predict. Key points: - COVID-era lockdowns caused GDP destruction; the coming shock will be three to four times worse, with COVID-style contractions appearing mild in comparison. - A 1% drop in global GDP historically pushes about 40–50 million people worldwide into extreme poverty. A 10% global GDP decline could thrust about 500 million people into extreme poverty (unable to eat, dress, shelter, or pay for basic needs). - The Strait of Hormuz has been effectively shut, reducing oil flow; this is part of a broader energy squeeze impacting global economies. The existing buffer of energy and spare parts will evaporate in a matter of months, worsening supply chains and transportation. - The result will be a global energy shock causing a significant GDP hit (the speaker estimates at least 10% in GDP, possibly 12–14% or more). This is framed as “triple COVID” with numbers centered around a 10%+GDP reduction. - The current U.S. energy advantage is described as temporary; allied economies (Taiwan, South Korea, Japan, Australia) will suffer, and Europe faces energy lockdowns as the U.S. allegedly influenced energy geopolitics (including Nord Stream incidents) and the dollar’s role in global energy trade is challenged as BRICS nations move toward other currencies (e.g., yuan). - The collapse is framed as global and systemic: once energy supplies tighten, there will be a cascade of shortages—tires, lubricants, food, housing—and a widening wealth gap between a small entrenched elite and impoverished masses, with the middle class largely disappearing. - Social and political consequences are predicted: increased desperation could lead to uprisings and revolutions in some countries; domestic political upheaval in the U.S. is expected, including talk of impeachment dynamics and shifts in power. - The analysis criticizes neoclassical economics (Cobb-Douglas production function) for treating energy as interchangeable with other inputs; the speaker argues that without energy, you cannot operate the rest of the economy, regardless of labor or capital. - Historical comparisons: the Great Depression saw a 30% GDP contraction; the 2008 Great Financial Crisis caused about 1–2% global GDP reduction; COVID caused about 3% globally. The coming energy shock is argued to exceed these, with an estimated minimum of a 10% GDP reduction. - The audience is urged to prepare by decentralizing, becoming more self-reliant, and developing resilience: own gold and silver, consider privacy-focused crypto, grow food, pay off debts, keep stored diesel, and acquire practical skills to survive long-term systemic breakdowns. - The speaker emphasizes the need to trade with diverse global partners (including China, Russia, Iran) rather than engage in coercive or militaristic policies, arguing that the current path will impoverish the U.S. and hollow out its infrastructure. - A recurring theme is that the American quality of manufacturing and supply chains has declined; examples are given of quality-control failures in U.S. industry (e.g., a John Deere machine with a poorly tightened bolt, poor auto manufacturing standards) and the claim that the U.S. cannot match China’s manufacturing automation and scale in weapons production. The argument is made that the U.S. would struggle to produce effective weapons at scale and that China’s capabilities (drones, hypersonics, robotics) are far ahead. - The discussion ties economic collapse to broader geopolitical shifts, warning that sanctions and aggressive postures will backfire, leading to currency collapse and widespread hardship unless a pivot to peaceful, global trade and internal resilience is adopted. - The message concludes with a practical call to action: take steps to weather the coming period by building self-reliance, acquiring knowledge, and preparing for a prolonged period of economic and societal stress. Throughout, the speakers frame these developments as imminent and systemic, affecting not only economics but also social stability, infrastructure, and daily life. They stress preparedness, self-reliance, and strategic global engagement as the path to mitigating the coming challenges. The content also includes promotional segments about Infowars-related branding and merchandise, which are not part of the core factual points about the economic analysis.