reSee.it - Related Video Feed

A speaker warns that something very serious is happening in Canada related to Alberta’s push for independence. He says rumors from private conversations indicate discussions about how far the federal government will go to prevent Alberta from separating, noting that actions against protesters—bank account freezes, jailing, and emergency powers—have occurred in the past, implying they could be used against a province seeking independence. He adds that, concurrently, there is quiet military movement and exercises increasing in Alberta. Speaker 1 reports that the Canadian Forces base at Suffield, Alberta will see increased activity this summer, with larger base size and infrastructure drawing renewed interest for military use, suggesting a coincidence with Alberta’s referendum timing. He also mentions claims of a foreign security presence from China in Alberta’s oil patch with heavily armed guards, tying this to federal pressure, military movement, and foreign influence in the same region as the independence push. Speaker 2 provides an update on the Stay Free Alberta petition, noting 178,000 signatures collected—enough to trigger a referendum. An Alberta judge paused the signature validation process after three First Nations challenged it as infringing treaty rights. The pause affects what comes after collection, not the collection itself. Petitioners must submit signatures by May 2 for Elections Alberta validation. After failed mediation, the judge ordered a one-month pause while she decides whether to shut down the petition altogether. Courts have already blocked delivery of petition signatures, indicating the process is being slowed or obstructed. The speaker asks what happens if the vote cannot proceed but pressure continues, and mentions a looming court challenge and possible injunction that could restrict canvassing rights. Speaker 3 echoes concern about the campaign, urging supporters to keep collecting signatures as if the future of children and grandchildren depend on it, despite uncertainties about legal obstacles and potential injunctions. He discusses alleged internal communications from a private visit, where Mark Carney was reportedly asked what he would do if Alberta moved toward independence. He recounts an alleged message from a Stelco employee claiming Carney answered that there will be no Alberta independence because he would invoke the Emergencies Act. The claim is presented as an unreported allegation from a private source, not mainstream media. A speaker identifies the incident as a pivotal element that would move beyond politics into enforceable power, implying implications beyond Canada. Speaker 4 notes Alberta’s resource wealth and the strategic interest of the United States, suggesting Alberta could be a valuable partner for energy trade. The discussion touches on the possibility of Alberta voting on independence and the broader geopolitical attention this situation attracts. The overall message emphasizes internal pressures, legal challenges, military and foreign dimensions, and alleged statements about invoking emergency powers in response to Alberta’s independence movement, with ongoing updates and calls for continued public action.

The Canadian government has invoked the Emergencies Act, granting unprecedented power. Financial service providers can now freeze accounts without a court order, and those involved in protests may face financial sanctions and criminal charges. Some banks have already frozen accounts of protesters. A speaker warns of growing authoritarianism and urges people to fight back. The Prime Minister acknowledges the right to protest but criticizes using protests to demand policy changes. He emphasizes the importance of following science to protect freedoms and values. Critics accuse him of admiring China's dictatorship and suppressing citizens' rights. Responsible leaders are urged to consider their stance.

Illegal blockades are harming Canadians and foreign money is funding this illegal activity. The border will not stay closed. Politicians don't control the police in a democratic society, but everything is being considered to stop this unlawful activity. If you joined the protests due to COVID frustrations, you must realize that you are breaking the law. We understand your frustration with COVID and the safety measures in place.

In this video, the speaker discusses various issues affecting Canada, such as inflation, government spending, immigration, and foreign interference. They argue that government policies are intentionally causing the decline of the middle class and the destruction of the country. The speaker highlights the impact of high housing prices, the influx of immigrants, and the influence of foreign powers like China. They urge viewers to wake up, get involved, and pay attention to the issues at hand.

President Harris stated that Trump would turn the US military against the American public to promote his agenda. However, the Biden-Harris administration allegedly enacted a directive two weeks prior that changed the law to make it legal for the U.S. military to use lethal force against American citizens on American soil. The speaker claims that under this directive, the U.S. military can legally shoot and kill Americans who engage in political protest because they disagree with White House policies. The speaker emphasizes that this initiative came from the Democratic party, not during the Trump administration, and is the reason they left the party.

The Canadian Armed Forces can assist domestic law enforcement in Canada as needed under the National Defence Act. This is part of their responsibility to support civil authority when required. Minister Blair, who has experience in both areas, can provide more information on this topic.

Trump's plan to use the military for deportations is deeply concerning. The military is not trained for domestic issues, and this approach misuses its role. Past actions, like the Lafayette Square incident and attempts to seize ballots, raise further alarm about potential military overreach. In response, Democrats are considering various strategies to push back, including legal action, congressional efforts, and public protests. While discussions are ongoing among different groups, there is a collective effort to prevent the implementation of harmful policies and protect constitutional rights. There are significant concerns about the implications of Trump's proposals and the need for vigilance against abuses of power.

The Biden administration has introduced a concerning directive, DOD 5240.01, which reportedly grants the Pentagon unprecedented authority to use lethal force against Americans protesting government policies on U.S. soil. This marks a significant shift in military power and raises alarming questions about its implications. The directive has sparked widespread discussion and fear, as it allows the military to potentially engage in deadly force against citizens for the first time in history.

War is coming to the Arctic Circle, with Greenland seen as part of a broader clash for the world’s most important trade route. Russia and China have already laid claim to large portions; the United States now seeks in. The discussion notes the growing competition over the Arctic, Iran, and Europe as flashpoints. Trump is calling for a Pentagon budget increase from 1.0 trillion to 1.5 trillion for 2027. He tweeted that after negotiations, the military budget should be 1.5 trillion “in the very troubled and dangerous times,” and suggested capping CEO compensation in defense contracts at 5 million per year. Following the tweet, Lockheed Martin stock jumped, as did other defense contractors. Glenn Greenwald is cited, saying the Pentagon fails its audit for the seventh consecutive year and questions how hundreds of billions of dollars move around, then notes a preference to increase budgets from 850 billion to 1.0 trillion to 1.5 trillion. Tucker Carlson is quoted suggesting war is coming and that Trump may know something others do not. Speaker 1 frames the budget increase as the kind of funding a country anticipates a global or regional war would have, calling it a “war budget,” not a peacekeeping one, and suggests we’re moving toward a big war. Speaker 0 adds that a large-scale attack against Iran is likely before the end of the year, and questions what will happen in the Arctic Circle. The panel introduces Ben Freeman, author of The Trillion Dollar War Machine, who joins to discuss. Freeman’s point is that the president justifies a larger foreign war budget by pointing to money generated abroad, including oil resources in places like Venezuela. The panel agrees the implication is that the military is “paying for itself” through conquest, and a speaker notes this echoes imperial patterns. Another participant emphasizes that China’s military budget is about a third to a quarter of the U.S. budget, but China has triple the personnel, arguing that quantity does not necessarily equal capability and that the U.S. remains the strongest military force. There is a claim that the current budget primarily funds contractors, not service members, veterans, or families; defense contractors’ revenues largely come from U.S. government contracts, and this is reflected in stock surges when large budgets are announced. The discussion cites a statistic that about 54% of the defense budget goes to Pentagon contractors, and notes a contrast: one in four military families faces food insecurity despite the existing trillion-dollar budget. The panel argues that perpetual war is used to justify the size of the budget, not merely to address threats, but to keep the defense industry tidal-wanked into profits. They discuss whether diplomacy with Russia could be a more effective path, and acknowledge a shift in U.S. policy rhetoric compared to earlier promises to avoid endless wars. There is mention that the Senate voted to limit presidential actions in Venezuela; the president defends war powers as constitutional, while critics point to campaigns that promised restraint on war. Ben Freeman promotes his book, The Trillion Dollar War Machine, noting its availability in hardback, Kindle, and audiobooks, and the discussion ends with praise for the book and thanks to Freeman.

The Canadian Armed Forces can assist domestic law enforcement in Canada as needed under the National Defence Act. This is part of their responsibility to support civil authority when required. It is essential to have this capacity in place for future threats.

A Department of Defense directive has expanded domestic military authority to include lethal force, allowing the military to use lethal force within US borders, even against citizens, with the Secretary of Defense's approval. The directive, DOD Directive 5240.01, which took effect September 27, expands the circumstances under which the DOD can assist law enforcement, including the use of lethal force. The directive states that defense intelligence components may provide personnel to assist law enforcement agencies when lives are in danger, with the use of lethal force requiring Secretary of Defense approval. This expanded authority has raised concerns, especially before the election, with some politicians predicting civil unrest regardless of the election outcome. Representative Jamie Raskin stated that if Trump wins, "we will need civil war conditions." The speaker suggests that politicians are preparing for civil unrest whether Trump wins or loses, potentially instigated by three-letter agencies.

In the past 3 years, more people have left than joined the Canadian Armed Forces, leading to recruitment issues. The speaker criticizes the government for prioritizing spending on various projects over supporting veterans and the military. They highlight examples of what they perceive as wasteful spending, totaling over $600 billion, suggesting this may contribute to low recruitment numbers due to lack of support for those who serve the country.

Mark Harney allegedly advised the liberal government to enact the Emergencies Act on protesters in Ottawa. According to the speaker, Harney advised Trudeau for a very long time. The speaker claims the Act was deemed unconstitutional and unreasonable, violating the Charter of Rights. The speaker says the government is appealing the decision. The speaker believes the protesters occupying Ottawa are not patriots but are inciting anarchy and should face consequences. Anyone funding the convoy is funding sedition. Foreign funders interfered in domestic affairs and should be punished. The speaker insists foreign governments involved should be exposed.

According to credible sources within the police infrastructure, the government has chosen to use brute force instead of negotiating with the popular movement happening across the country. The RCMP is assembling and bringing in hundreds of riot cops to make mass arrests. They plan to disrupt the protests by cutting off cell phone service and transporting the arrested individuals to Lansdowne for processing. The government is avoiding dialogue and peaceful resolution, opting instead to disperse the protests forcefully. The RCMP riot cops will be supported by the exempt OPS and other police forces like the OPP and Durham police. This information is being shared to inform viewers about the situation.

If the military is deployed in the US, their weapons aren't just aimed at other countries, but at you. If you don't follow orders to stay indoors, you're seen as the enemy. This could lead to martial law.

The speaker condemns the Canadian government, saying, "That's your Canadian government right there that just did this." They note, "I went to Bosnia, Somalia, and Afghanistan, and I did not fucking serve my country for this bullshit that's fucking in front of us." They add, "Right? The government has committed their own."

The speaker discusses Canada becoming interesting in January and February due to protesters in Ottawa. The job of reporters, according to the speaker, is to go out and ask protesters why they are on the streets, why they are there with their kids, and why there is a bouncy castle in the middle of Ottawa, to discover the story. The speaker claims the Government did not want that and that the Prime Minister decided in advance that the protesters were all the modern excommunications—Nazis, white supremacists, anti-Semites, probably homophobes, misogynists, probably transphobes, etc.—and then he brings in the Emergency Powers Act. The speaker asks what the mainstream media would do at such a time, and asserts they would question it, but claims the Canadian mainstream media did not and instead acted as an Amen Chorus of the government. Several examples are provided. A CBC host described the Freedom Convoy as a feral mob. A Toronto Star columnist said, “sorry for the language, it's a homegrown hate farm that was then jet fueled by an American right funded rat fucking operation.” The speaker notes that CBC claimed two indigenous women who were scared to go outside in Ottawa because of racist violence did not bother to mention that indigenous drummers had led the truckers in an 0 Canada rendition. The National Observer allegedly stated that many black and indigenous freedom convoy supporters were, in fact, duped by the truckers. A Globe and Mail reporter claimed, “My 13 year old son told me to tell protesters I'm not a Jew” out of fear of antisemitic violence, without mentioning that one of the convoy leaders was Jewish. The speaker argues this demonstrably rancid and corrupt behavior is rooted in a system where in Canada, the media is funded by the government. It is stated that in 2018, election year, there was a coincidence with the government funding; the Canadian media allegedly received $595,000,000 over five years, and the Toronto Star estimated it was going to be getting $3,000,000 from the Government in the first half of the year. The government is described as able to tell banks to shut down people’s bank accounts, and able to tell the media what to do, with the media then doing the bidding of the government camp. The speaker concludes that this is not a free society’s media.

President Harris stated that Trump would turn the US military against the American public to promote his agenda. However, the Biden-Harris administration allegedly enacted a directive two weeks ago that changes the law, making it legal for the U.S. military to use lethal force against American citizens on American soil. Under this directive, the U.S. military can legally shoot and kill Americans who engage in political protest because they disagree with White House policies. This initiative came from the Democratic party, not during the Trump administration.

The speaker discusses the alleged plans of the government to declare martial law and strip the president's power to call the military. They claim that the country is being burned down by Antifa, Black Lives Matter, and Soros-funded groups, using the Israeli conflict as a catalyst. The speaker also talks about the long-term beta testing of tactics to create chaos and collapse civilization. They mention the deployment of troops in Chicago and the establishment of permanent TSA-style checkpoints in subways. The speaker criticizes the actions of Liz Cheney and accuses the Democrats of gaslighting and manipulating elections. They conclude by urging viewers to support their cause and promote their products.

A Department of Defense directive, 5240.01, effective September 27th, expands military authority in domestic law enforcement, potentially including lethal force. While assassinations are forbidden, the directive now allows the military to assist law enforcement when lives are in danger, with Secretary of Defense approval required for activities involving potential lethality. This includes situations where confrontations between law enforcement and civilians are anticipated. Alex Jones has warned of domestic martial law drills and military activities, including mock training exercises across the country. Examples include black helicopter raids with live ammunition in North Carolina and the use of civilians for intelligence gathering. Amidst concerns about the economy and potential national disasters, Biden might implement hidden tax traps, impacting retirement funds, income taxes, and utility/gas prices. Food costs are predicted to rise by 18%. Gold Coat offers a free 2024 gold and silver kit and a bonus on qualified accounts to protect savings.

A group of public interest organizations and lawmakers are quietly planning to prevent former President Trump from pressuring the US military to carry out his political agenda. The concern is that this could undermine civilian control of the government. The article specifically mentions Trump potentially using the military to suppress domestic protests, similar to the Black Lives Matter (BLM) movement. The groups involved in this plan were also involved in previous protests against Trump. The fear is that if Trump were to win the election, these tactics would be used to destabilize his entire term and prevent him from stopping protests, even if they turned violent or occupied federal buildings. The speaker warns people to watch a movie about the Serbian revolution to understand how these tactics work.

A Department of Defense directive, 5,240.01, effective September 27th, expands military authority in domestic law enforcement, potentially including lethal force. While assassinations are forbidden, the directive now includes provisions for military assistance in situations where lives are in danger, even if lethal force is reasonably foreseeable. Secretary of Defense approval is required for assistance involving potential lethality or confrontations between law enforcement and civilians. Alex Jones has warned of domestic martial law drills and military activities. Examples cited include mock training exercises across the country, such as those involving Delta Force, all night restaurant shootings, warehouse explosions, black helicopter raids, and civilian intelligence gathering. There is concern that Biden might implement hidden tax traps, potentially affecting retirement funds, income taxes, and utility/gas prices. Food prices are predicted to rise by 18%. Gold Coat is offering a free 2024 gold and silver kit and a bonus on qualified accounts to help protect against these economic concerns.

The US government has passed a bill that gives the military more power and funding. This includes expanding the use of surveillance drones for commercial and private purposes. There are concerns about the militarization of law enforcement and the erosion of constitutional rights. The Department of Homeland Security has purchased a large amount of ammunition and military equipment, raising questions about who they are preparing to fight. There are also reports of military training exercises and the potential for martial law. Some believe that the US is heading towards a totalitarian state and that religious liberty and personal privacy are under attack. The situation is seen as a complete takeover and intensification of a police state.

Trudeau announced that the Canadian Armed Forces can now be deployed against civilians, a move criticized by some. This action would not be accepted in the United States. Spread the word about this concerning decision.