reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The speaker discusses the various unethical practices of Johnson and Johnson, including their involvement in the World Trade Center incident, the opioid crisis, and the talcum powder lawsuits. They highlight the company's fraudulent activities, bribery, and manipulation of clinical data. The speaker also mentions a case involving a pharmaceutical called factor 8, which caused thousands of deaths. They criticize Johnson and Johnson for declaring bankruptcy to avoid liability and express the need for accountability. The speaker advises against trusting the company and suggests that Congress allows such behavior to continue.

The speaker discusses the various unethical practices of Johnson and Johnson, including their involvement in the World Trade Center incident, the opioid crisis, and the talcum powder lawsuits. They highlight how the company engaged in fraud, bribery, and deceptive marketing practices. The speaker also mentions a case involving a pharmaceutical called factor 8, which caused thousands of deaths. They criticize Johnson and Johnson for declaring bankruptcy to avoid liability and express the need for accountability. The speaker advises against trusting the company and suggests that Congress allows such behavior to continue.

The conversation opens with Speaker 0 arguing that there is no climate catastrophe or climate emergency. They claim that the threat narrative is pervasive, describing “tentacles” extending across the public sector, private sector, and academia. The speaker asserts that politicians, exemplified by Mark Carney, use fear mongering to secure votes, and notes that this phenomenon is seen globally, predominantly in left-leaning governments. According to Speaker 0, the climate discourse represents self-sabotage and economic suicide. They describe economies as being strangled by a left-wing agenda, contending that such forces are shaping markets, national policy, media output, education, and financial flows. The overarching claim is that this agenda is about power and control, with fear mongering used to imply a climate catastrophe. The transcript then shifts to a brief interlude welcoming Desiree Fixler. Desiree Fixler is thanked for joining again, with a note that much has happened since their last chat.

The speaker discusses the various unethical practices of Johnson and Johnson, including their involvement in the World Trade Center incident, the opioid crisis, and the talcum powder lawsuits. They highlight the company's fraudulent activities, bribery, and manipulation of clinical data. The speaker also mentions a case involving a pharmaceutical called factor 8, which caused thousands of deaths. They criticize Johnson and Johnson for declaring bankruptcy to avoid liability and express the need for accountability. The speaker advises against trusting the company and suggests that Congress allows such behavior to continue.

The CEO of The Weather Channel, who is not a scientist, argues against the consensus on global warming. He claims that science is not a vote and states that climate change is not happening, with no significant man-made global warming in the past or future. He believes that the issue has become political instead of scientific, but asserts that the science is on his side. The other speaker questions the 97% agreement among climate scientists and wonders if it is fabricated. The CEO explains that government funding for climate research is biased towards supporting the global warming hypothesis, leading to the majority of published reports supporting it. The conversation ends with the acknowledgement that they won't reach a conclusion.

The speaker criticizes climate czar John Kerry, calling him an 80-year-old who doesn't care about the future and is out of touch with reality. They argue that leaders around the world ignore Kerry's calls to eliminate coal-fired power plants because they prioritize their economies and feeding their populations. The speaker also questions Kerry's knowledge of the advancements in emission scrubbers for coal plants. They highlight Vice President Kamala Harris's threat to punish those who deny climate science. The speaker interviews journalist Michael Shellenberger, who discusses the elites' open expression of their hatred for humanity and their desire to keep energy scarce. They mention the bullying of oil and gas companies by the ESG movement and the attack on cheap energy as an attack on modern civilization. The speaker expresses hope that people will realize the scam and the anti-human nature of the climate movement. They mention the resistance rising against environmentally destructive renewable energy projects and the potential downfall of Europe due to its overdependence on renewables.

Speaker 0 says that the richest people in the world have recently started telling people they need to produce more energy, which they find “a little weird” because the same group has spent at least the past fifteen years—since Al Gore became famous—telling people the opposite. Speaker 0 claims they said energy is not the source of life or the base of civilization, but instead the cause of humanity’s downfall: the destruction of the earth and the main reason for climate change. Speaker 0 further states that CO2 is the reason it is getting warmer and that this warming happens because climate cycles are part of nature, including the example that glaciers existed and now do not. Speaker 0 says this group previously taught that burning fossil fuels was not only bad for the environment but a sin, and that society should be organized around being “carbon conscious” because they “love the earth.” Speaker 0 then claims that the same people, including Larry Fink of BlackRock, have since said they are going to take a pause on concern about global warming and that society needs more electricity. Speaker 0 states that most electricity on Earth is produced by boiling water to move turbines, and that a small portion uses radioactive material in nuclear reactors, while most generation is from coal, then natural gas, and some oil. Speaker 0 characterizes this as essentially industrial-age technology: refining and cleaning, but fundamentally the same process of burning fuel to boil water and generate power. Speaker 0 says these figures who previously framed that technology as inefficient and morally wrong are now calling for a massive expansion of it. Speaker 0 links this shift to AI, describing artificial intelligence as a dramatic, quantum increase in processing power that enables computers to reason and mimic human thinking, replacing a lot of human labor. Speaker 0 states that AI is incredibly demanding of power and will require far more electricity than most people understood. Speaker 0 concludes that society will need to put on hold—and invert—its concerns about global warming in order to build AI.

The speaker discusses the various criminal activities of Johnson and Johnson, including their involvement in the World Trade Center incident, the opioid crisis, and the talcum powder lawsuits. They highlight the company's fraudulent practices, bribery, and manipulation of clinical data. The speaker emphasizes that Johnson and Johnson knew their talcum powders caused ovarian cancer but did nothing about it. They also mention the company's bankruptcy declaration and the lack of accountability for the harm caused. The speaker concludes by urging people not to trust Johnson and Johnson and criticizing Congress for allowing such actions to continue.

The video features confrontations between journalists and speakers at the World Economic Forum. The journalists question the carbon footprint of the event and criticize the attendees for their travel and environmental impact. The speakers dismiss the questions as stupid and refuse to answer. The video also includes clips of Rebel News journalists questioning individuals about ESG (environmental, social, and governance) policies and the goals of the World Economic Forum. The journalists express concerns about transparency and the influence of globalist agendas. They urge viewers to support their work and visit their website.

The speaker notes that 'the climate change hysteria has sort of magically gone away' and offers two theories: 'the climate hysteria was astroturfed' with 'funding got pulled with Biden out,' or that 'there's so much money to be made in AI that no one wants to criticize the energy industry anymore.' They add that 'climate change was always a luxury belief in Europe but Europe is having financial problems.' The speaker argues that 'the data has been so not cooperating now for several years and we don't have we just don't have the signs that they promise us' and says 'All data is fake,' questions 'measuring the temperature of the earth,' mentions 'No. We don't have like a new technology,' and concludes 'climate change I'm not expecting to make a big comeback but I could be wrong.'

James O’Keefe goes undercover at the World Economic Forum in Davos and reports on hidden camera footage in which elites allegedly admit to spraying sulfur dioxide and other toxic aerosols to alter the climate. The claim is that sulfur dioxide, the same chemical released by volcanic eruptions, blocks the sun and cools the planet, and also causes itchy, watery eyes, chest tightness, worsened asthma, nasal irritation, sinus pressure, headaches, and sneezing. O’Keefe asserts they are not just admitting it but laughing about it, and he urges viewers to like, follow, and share to wake the American people up. The footage allegedly shows that sprayed particles linger in the atmosphere for months to a year, actively altering weather patterns over time. The speakers allegedly avoid the terms climate engineering or geoengineering, instead calling it aerosol injections to keep the public calm. A clip is cited where a participant says, “We invest in these technologies to assist with the warming climate,” noting that sulfur dioxide will block some warming and that particles stay in the air for a year; there is mention of emitting the technology into the atmosphere to help with global warming, and a preference to avoid terms like climate engineering because they scare people. Another segment features Kennedy Ritchie, president/CEO of Four Air, who, unaware of being recorded, reportedly states that much geoengineering work “came directly out of the military” and that “the military does this all the time behind closed doors,” including cloud seeding. He suggests it would be interesting if governments began doing this over each other’s territories to control weather. The discussion touches on the Airborne Snow Observatory and upper-atmosphere weather monitoring, with a sense that those involved do not see the impacts on others as a concern. Later, BlackRock is named as being behind the climate initiatives, with DARPA (the Pentagon’s ARPA) mentioned, along with references to Vanguard technologies and an AI platform. The participants reportedly discuss SAI (stratospheric aerosol injections) and sulfur dioxide, mentioning “the sphere” and other technologies like laser light pumps and dark panels. The video frames this as elites openly discussing sky modification, with military and financial power involved, suggesting lack of consent, transparency, and accountability. It credits Shadow of Ezra for posting the footage and James O’Keefe for undercover reporting, along with Jimmy Dore and Dane Wiggington for publicizing geoengineering warnings. The speaker calls for accountability and transparency and urges viewers to share the video.

Ned Ryan, American CEO, joins the discussion on the World Economic Forum's tactics. He agrees that their goal is to instill panic about climate change, just as they did with COVID. He criticizes the organization for using fear manipulation and claims they aim to establish a global technocratic ruling elite, merging big government, big tech, and big money. Ryan suggests that the World Economic Forum wants to create a modern form of feudalism, where they are the ruling lords and the rest of us are serfs. He concludes by stating that their ultimate objective is to make us believe we should be content with having nothing.

Tom Harris, executive director of the International Climate Science Coalition, argues that the policies surrounding climate change are not only destructive but also based on lies. He believes that the only way to address this issue is by challenging the science behind climate change. Harris shares his personal journey from being a climate alarmist to questioning the existence of a climate crisis. He mentions a professor who debunked the idea of a runaway greenhouse effect on Earth, citing the lack of consistent correlation between carbon dioxide levels and temperature throughout history. Harris highlights a book called "Climate Change Reconsidered" as evidence that thousands of scientists question the prevailing narrative on climate change.

Dan asks if Hugh supports Trump. Hugh confirms and talks about being an early public endorser. When Dan brings up rising ocean levels, Hugh shares his experience in Antarctica and questions the impact of global warming. He criticizes the lack of mention of global warming in investment prospectuses and believes it's a scam. Hugh expresses jealousy towards Al Gore for his early recognition of the issue. The conversation ends with a promotion to watch more on their website.

The speaker questions why Greta Thunberg never criticizes Saudi Arabia or Russia, only Western energy. They ask if she will condemn OPEC energy and every delegate who arrived on a private jet. They challenge her to condemn private jets and ask if she has ever been on one. The speaker claims to own 100 private jets and asks if Greta has ever been on one, to which she responds affirmatively.

The speaker discusses the causality between atmospheric CO2 levels and temperature. They argue that human activities have a minimal influence on CO2 increase, with natural effects, particularly temperature, being responsible for over 85% of atmospheric CO2 rise since the industrial revolution. They criticize the IPCC's focus on anthropogenic CO2 emissions as the sole cause of climate change, calling it contrary to the truth. The speaker accuses certain individuals, such as Jean Jouzel and Valérie Masson Delmotte, of scientific fraud and highlights the lack of evidence in the IPCC's reports and their inaccurate predictions. They emphasize the need for policymakers and industry leaders to realize they have been deceived by the IPCC and its "apprentice sorcerers."

Speaker 0 questions whether the climate change narrative is dying, noting that many people are afraid to say so for fear of being called a climate denier. They claim a growing number of people believe “this is bullshit.” They relate conversations with energy industry people who said, “the thing is collapsing because the money people are realizing we can't pay for this,” and that the grid cannot rely on solar and wind because it “needs to maintain frequency.” They reference Spain shutting down last year and describe the grid as unstable now. They say, for the last ten years, engineers have known there’s a major problem but won’t say it in meetings because “the climate stuff comes from the top and you can't question it,” yet this is starting to break down as people realize trillions of dollars have been spent to move from “85% of our energy is from, you know, real fuels” to “84.2” or so, which they view as insane. Speaker 0 asserts that “Real fuels are gonna be needed,” and notes a shift in stance on the climate hoax. They claim the pivot is happening because “they want data centers and they want to pour massive energy into them,” and suddenly “don’t care about the climate because all the boys up the top who are pushing the climate are now saying, no. We need data centers. We need CBDC. We need a crypto,” which is described as a huge energy use, along with mentions of AI. They conclude that it’s “always crypto,” and state that these developments reveal the climate pushers to be liars.

Speaker 0 introduces Desiree as an outspoken whistleblower who has challenged the Davos elite, asserts that old systems are not fit for the twenty-first century, and asks how Desiree helped build the WEF’s great reset. Speaker 1, Desiree, recounts that in 2020 she obtained her dream job as chief sustainability officer at Deutsche Bank. She states that while in that role she witnessed fraud and describes the annual report as a “legal living document” filled with lies. She says that a couple of weeks after she spoke out, she was fired, and shortly after, the annual report was released with “all the lies.” She describes a subsequent “horrific smear campaign” and notes that within two days, U.S. authorities contacted her, including the SEC, the FBI, and the Department of Justice. She mentions that they asked her questions, implying inquiry or investigation directed at her claims. Speaker 0 questions whether Desiree is advancing the view that “they’re controlling the world.” Speaker 1 asserts that the WEF is vast and that its tentacles affect every part of life. She claims that this situation is not stakeholder capitalism but socialism, accusing the WEF of lying to the public. She contends that the Davos agenda involves more than net zero and asserts that it is connected to a “climate crisis” manufactured by a “multi trillion dollar industrial complex.” She reiterates that the Davos agenda is about more than climate goals and frames it as a broad, powerful economic and political enterprise. Speaker 0 asks Desiree whether she ever met Claus Schwab and whether she has anything to say about the encounter. Speaker 1 responds with a brief affirmative, saying “Yes,” to having met Schwab, and adds “Truthfully” when asked for further remarks about the meeting. Summary of key points: - Desiree’s career move to Deutsche Bank in 2020 as chief sustainability officer and her claim of discovering fraud and a lies-filled annual report. - Her claim of being fired and subjected to a smear campaign, followed by inquiries from U.S. authorities (SEC, FBI, DOJ). - The assertion that the WEF’s influence extends across life, characterizing the Davos agenda as socialism rather than stakeholder capitalism, and alleging a manufactured climate crisis tied to a multi-trillion-dollar industrial complex. - The claim that the Davos agenda encompasses more than net zero and entails broader power and influence. - Desiree confirms she met Claus Schwab, with a brief, candid acknowledgment.

The speaker emphasizes that the climate crisis is directly linked to the burning of fossil fuels such as oil, gas, and coal. They criticize the oil industry for deceiving and manipulating the public, buying off politicians, and denying scientific evidence for decades. The speaker appreciates the efforts of California and others in acknowledging the urgency of the crisis and the need for action. They express gratitude to the Secretary General for using their moral authority to clarify the challenges we face. The speaker concludes by acknowledging that everyone has unique circumstances and challenges, but emphasizes the importance of unity in addressing the crisis.

The speaker discusses the numerous unethical practices of Johnson and Johnson, a company that has faced lawsuits for fraud, bribery, and deceptive marketing. They specifically mention the issue of asbestos in talcum powder, which the company knew about but failed to address. The speaker also mentions a case involving a pharmaceutical called factor 8, which was infected with HIV and caused deaths. They criticize Johnson and Johnson for declaring bankruptcy to avoid liability. The speaker concludes by urging people not to trust the company and criticizing Congress for allowing such practices to continue.

In the 19th century, John Rockefeller made oil seem scarce to increase profit. He sent scientists to a convention to claim that oil came from fossils, leading to the term "fossil fuels." However, it was never proven that oil actually came from fossils. Despite this, Rockefeller donated a large sum of money to the general education board, which influenced the belief that oil is a fossil fuel. The question remains: did oil really come from fossils?

The speaker states he is the founder of The Weather Channel and asserts there is no consensus in science, only facts. He claims climate change is not happening, there has been no man-made global warming, and there is no reason to expect any in the future. He alleges CNN has taken a strong position that global warming is a consensus, but the science is on his side. He believes the issue has become political instead of scientific. When questioned about the claim that 97% of climate scientists agree on global warming, he explains that the government provides billions in research money annually, but only to scientists who support the global warming hypothesis. Therefore, scientists produce results that align with the government's position to secure funding, which doesn't make it true.

Speaker 0 argues that groups like Just Stop Oil are funded by the Getty and Rockefeller families. He claims the Rockefeller family made its money in oil and has long supported eugenics and funding, contributing to what he describes as “this sort of new environmental movement” that downplays pollution and emphasizes carbon dioxide as the sole concern. He cites the Club of Rome, stating that its quote—“the biggest enemy of humanity is man”—is the core narrative. He contends that the real polluters are not corporations or the U.S. military, even by climate-change metrics, but rather ordinary people. He asserts that the underlying aim is to control how much energy people can use, which would allow controlling economic activity and, he says, how large families can become. He concludes that this is the ultimate objective.

In this video, the speakers discuss the financial incentives and political motivations behind the climate change narrative. They explain how the climate industry has grown into a multitrillion dollar business, with many jobs and funding dependent on the existence of a climate crisis. They highlight the pressure to conform to the consensus and the consequences faced by those who question the narrative. The speakers argue that the climate scare is not only an attack on science but also a means for governments to increase their power and control over people's lives. They emphasize the need for open scientific inquiry and express concerns about the suppression of dissenting views.

The speaker questions the profits made by the company from government subsidies and opioids. They accuse the company of lying about the addictive nature of opioids and causing the opioid crisis. The speaker highlights the company's billion-dollar settlements and expresses outrage at their attempts to limit liability. They emphasize the importance of private rights of action and the need to hold big corporations accountable. The speaker mentions a significant jury verdict and the fear it instills in companies. They call for more Americans to have recourse in court and changes to the bankruptcy code to prevent companies from avoiding accountability.