reSee.it - Related Video Feed

President Trump is correct that the immunity decision would help President Obama. However, it doesn't help him with impeachment. The Democratic Party and House managers in the second impeachment trial argued that a former president is still subject to impeachment after leaving office. This means figures like Lincoln or George Washington could be impeached. As predicted, this could backfire, as President Obama could be impeached if certain evidence holds true. Impeachment could strip Obama of immunity because, according to the Democrats' argument based on Article One Section Three Clause Seven of the Constitution, it bars one from holding further office while still being subject to criminal prosecution or indictment.

The Department of Justice may indict Donald Trump the day he leaves office. I strongly support indicting a president after they leave office. Threatening political opponents with jail time is unacceptable presidential behavior in a democracy.

The speaker criticizes the indictment against Trump, suggesting that if the bar is set this low, then prosecutors like Smith and Garland should expect similar treatment. The indictment claims that Trump conspired to interfere with the presidential election process. The speaker argues that using the same logic, one could argue that Biden prosecutors are conspiring against the 2024 presidential election.

The speaker criticizes the Supreme Court's decision that a president is immune from prosecution while in office, suggesting Joe Biden should have Donald Trump killed to prevent him from running for reelection. The speaker sarcastically suggests that since the Supreme Court said a president is above the law, Biden could shoot Trump on 5th Street to win the election.

Have you ever heard of someone innocent receiving a preemptive pardon? It seems unlikely, especially when it involves the president's family and associates. Seeking such pardons raises questions about guilt; if someone is innocent, why would they need one? Preemptive pardons suggest that crimes may have occurred, even if they are not publicly known. If the president were to issue these pardons, it might be framed as protecting his family from external threats. However, the underlying concern appears to be about his own and his family's legal troubles. The idea of a permanent pardon for individuals like Rudy Giuliani and the president's children is troubling, especially if they haven't been convicted of any crimes. Many would interpret these pardons as an admission of guilt.

The president appears focused on self-interest and grievances as his term nears its end. He is reportedly inquiring about the possibility of issuing preemptive pardons for himself, his family, and Rudy Giuliani. The clear answer is no; this would constitute a serious misuse of presidential pardon power.

If Trump wins, DOJ won't stop ongoing cases. Cases in Florida and DC could continue until January if Trump is reelected. Garland would still lead DOJ for a while after inauguration. Trump is using the Supreme Court decision on presidential immunity to delay his sentencing in New York until September. Uncertain how things will unfold in the coming months.

Have you ever heard of someone innocent receiving a preemptive pardon? It's unusual, especially when it's the president's family involved. Seeking preemptive pardons raises questions about guilt; if there's no wrongdoing, why ask for one? Such actions suggest that crimes may have occurred, even if not publicly known. If pardons are issued, they might be framed as protecting family reputations from external threats. The notion of a permanent pardon raises eyebrows, especially for individuals like Giuliani and the president's children, who haven't been convicted of crimes. If the president pardons them, many would interpret it as an admission of guilt. Meanwhile, there are still legal avenues to pursue accountability for any wrongdoing.

Some leaders feel a physical threat, including at least two assassination attempts against Trump, possibly by Iran. However, if Iran had tried to assassinate Trump, the U.S. would be at war with them. The American president was murdered, and we're still not allowed to know who did it and why. You can't have a president or senator who truly does his best to uphold the core idea of a democratic republic because he's worried about getting killed. If this were happening in Liberia you'd be like it's not a real government because whenever the president strays outside the pre prescribed boundaries, he gets murdered or worries about getting murdered. Foreign policy is the only issue they care about. They only care about the projection of force using American service personnel to fight faraway wars that have no material benefit.

The president may have immunity if he orders an assassination of a rival, as it could be considered an official act done for personal reasons.

Donald Trump's questioning of his attorney is not a crime, as it is allowed. The documents being discussed are photocopies generated by computers, not the only copies. The president still holds the same security clearances as when he was in office, unlike the vice president.

The president's lawyers are arguing in court about whether he can be charged for inciting an insurrection. They are using examples of previous presidents, such as George W. Bush and Barack Obama, to question if they could be prosecuted after their presidency. The lawyers claim that Bush lied about going to war with Iraq, while Obama's killing of an American citizen by drone is also brought up. These arguments are being presented in front of a three-judge panel in the DC appeals court. The court has not answered this question before, and it could potentially reach the Supreme Court in the future.

President Trump, a smart and experienced individual, will find a solution after enduring significant challenges in his fight to reclaim the Oval Office. It's shocking how uncivilized tactics have been used against him, including multiple assassination attempts, and I believe he remains at risk. The attacks on Trump extended beyond him to his family, which is particularly troubling. In Russia, even criminal gangs avoid targeting children and women during conflicts. This behavior reflects poorly on the political system in the United States, highlighting its decline.

The special counsel did not charge President Biden with a crime, citing his failing memory. This report highlights a double standard, as President Trump is facing charges for the same offense. The Democratic party is trying to convict and imprison Trump to prevent his re-election, which is what you would expect in countries like Pakistan or Brazil, not in the United States.

Rudy Giuliani has suggested the possibility of pardoning himself, claiming he has that authority, though it hasn't been tested in court. This raises concerns about the precedent it sets and how it affects perceptions of justice in the nation. The justice department will operate independently, and I won't dictate their actions or prosecutions. The people I appoint to lead the department will have the autonomy to make decisions on prosecutions. In our administration, we will not adopt a similar approach to pardons.

President Trump is being prosecuted for something he had control over, while Joe Biden seems unaware of the thousands of records in a garage that Hunter Biden had access to. The reason for this is fear. They can't pass their agendas with Trump in charge, but Biden is a puppet they can manipulate. Trump is focused on America and exposing corruption, which is why they target him. If he were to drop out, they wouldn't care about the next person. This should concern everyone. Keep this in mind. Trump 2024.

Have you ever heard of someone innocent receiving a preemptive pardon? It's typically reserved for those close to the president, like family or associates. Seeking such pardons raises questions about guilt; if someone is innocent, why would they need one? Preemptive pardons suggest that crimes may have been committed, even if not publicly known. If the president issues these pardons, it may be framed as protecting his family from external threats. The obsession with pardons indicates concern over potential criminal culpability. The idea of a permanent pardon raises further questions about accountability. If figures like Rudy Giuliani receive pardons, many would interpret that as an admission of guilt, questioning the necessity of such actions if there were no wrongdoing.

The executive power is vested in the President of the United States, as stated in Article Two of the Constitution. No court can assume that role or define the duties of those in the executive office. This amendment violates the separation of powers and Article Two, implying a federal court could limit the duties of individuals within the President's office, which isn't their role. Without action, presidents face numerous claims across multiple states, potentially using non-official funds to respond. Since 2017, courts have been used nefariously. Lawfare has been weaponized against President Trump, even after his presidency. The President defines the duties of personnel within the office, as clearly stated in Article Two.

The US government has no legal checks in place to overrule the president if he orders a nuclear attack. This system was designed during the Cold War to ensure a quick response to a surprise attack from the Soviet Union. While some may hope that senior political figures, military commanders, or lawyers would intervene, it would be illegal for them to do so. The president has complete control over the US Armed Forces as the commander in chief. This lack of checks is concerning, especially considering the president's recent actions of spreading false election claims and inciting violence. The current reality is that the president can order a military attack without delay, and there is no immediate solution to this issue.

It is unknown if lawsuits against Donald Trump will lead to impeachment. Trump has come close to criminality, and the greatest risk to him is Special Counsel Bob Mueller. The risk is that Trump obstructed justice by firing Comey with corrupt motives after Comey refused to drop the Flynn investigation. There is disagreement over whether Mueller can pursue criminal charges against Trump. The DOJ and president's lawyers historically take the position that a president cannot be criminally charged. It is an unsettled question that could end up in the Supreme Court. At a minimum, Mueller can charge Trump as an unindicted co-conspirator and seek permission from the grand jury to issue a report to Congress of the illegal conduct.

Attorney-client privilege is a well-known concept in our legal system, but it seems to be disregarded when it comes to Donald Trump. Even individuals like the accused Idaho sorority house intruder, Jeffrey Dahmer, and Charlie Manson enjoyed this privilege. The same goes for the Murdaugh guy in South Carolina. However, when it comes to Trump, his lawyer becomes a target, and this privilege is ignored.

The Supreme Court will hear arguments in April about a case involving presidential immunity. There is speculation that if the case is not resolved before the election, it could benefit Trump. Some believe conservative justices may delay the case to help him. Biden could potentially use this immunity to dismiss debts or take extreme actions. The quick resolution of the Bush v Gore case is referenced as a comparison.

In 1968, Pentagon engineer Ernie Fitzgerald exposed a corruption scandal involving the Pentagon overspending by $2 billion on shoddy military aircraft from Lockheed Martin. Fitzgerald sued President Nixon for retaliation but lost the case due to presidential immunity. Currently, a poll shows Donald Trump leading Joe Biden by 12 points in Michigan, causing Democrats to make legal attempts to charge Trump for challenging the election. Trump argues that as president, he had the authority to enforce election laws and investigate fraud. The prosecutor argues that if immunity is removed, future presidents could be charged with crimes. The discussion also touches on the possibility of assassinating political rivals, which is deemed outside the scope of presidential actions. Democrats are now considering strategies like institutionalizing Trump or using straight jackets to discredit him.

If Donald Trump regains power, it's not just a second term, but potentially a life term, considering his attempt to overthrow democracy. He is currently facing a legal trial for this, and while he is presumed innocent, it's important to consider that if you vote for someone who has already tried to steal your vote, it may be your last chance to cast a vote.

The 25th amendment poses no risk to me, but could be problematic for Joe Biden and his administration. Be cautious about what you wish for.