TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Under Trump, people have mobilized in large numbers to counter the alt-right and reject white supremacist violence. Now, the far right is making a final attempt to back Trump's bid to remain in power through any means necessary. It is crucial for all of us to unite, protect our streets, and dismantle Trumpism along with its neo-Nazi supporters. We must demonstrate that people of all races hold the true power, not the white supremacists.

Speaker 0: This is not just a story about violence and chaos; this is a money story. At the Government Accountability Institute, Peter Schweitzer and I followed the money to the top of what we call the protest industrial complex, Riot Inc. We found a network of NGOs—not just the Soros/Open Society network, but also the Arabella Funding Network, the Tides Funding Network, Neville Roy Singham and his network, Foreign Cash, and other big left-wing funders, including Hans Georg Wiese of Switzerland. They’re pouring money into this ecosystem. Here are three money facts about Riot Inc. Number one: Riot Inc. has many divisions like any corporation. It doesn’t just have the Antifa boots on the ground division; it has PR divisions, marketing divisions, and a well-funded legal division to get these boots back on the ground as quickly as possible. It has investors I mentioned. Number two: We have identified dozens of radical organizations—not just decentralized Antifa groups, but dozens of radical organizations—that have received more than $100,000,000 from Riot Inc. investors. These include lawyer groups and groups that advocate for calling good honest Americans fascists, etc. Number three: More than $100,000,000 in U.S. taxpayer funding has flowed into these funding networks, including at least $4,000,000 to these very groups themselves. There was an event in Atlanta called Stop Cop City; over 60 rioters were charged with domestic terrorism. These groups received money for that from both the billionaire class and taxpayer money. Additionally, this money helps fund decentralized crowdfunding platforms that support Antifa, the John Brown Gun Club of Elm Fork (which had links to the ICE facility attack), the Socialist Rifle Association, and others. Even though some groups don’t have LLCs or EIN numbers, they can still get paid. Some funding platforms are funded by this network that we call Riot Inc. Speaker 1: Do you know the name of any of the funders? Do you know the names? Because if you do, I’d like you to give them to Cash or Pam—or Christie? Speaker 0: Absolutely. Speaker 1: Or Christie? Speaker 0: Yes, we’ll do that. Speaker 1: As soon as you can. That’s all of you. Because you probably know the names after a certain period of time, you tend to find out. But these are people that do not have good intention for the country and that’s treasonous probably. So if you could, it would be very important if you could do that, it would be great. Speaker 0: it

The speaker claims that the Black Lives Matter and Antifa riots, the antisemitic riots after October 7, and current pro-illegal immigration protests are not organic, but funded by radicals, Marxists, and jihadists. These groups are allegedly funding violence and extremism. The speaker has introduced the Stop Funders Act, which adds rioting to the list of predicate crimes under RICO. This would allow federal prosecutors to target those who are financially supporting these activities. The speaker suggests that the Department of Justice should follow the money and prosecute those funding violence, harassment, and actions aimed at tearing down the country. The speaker believes that those funding these attacks on America are more dangerous than the mafia.

We should be focusing on moving forward is encouraging these mass mobilizations, mass peaceful mobilizations to disrupt far right organizing. I have been in meetings with labor leaders over the last couple of weeks. There seems to be more appetite in getting organizing and boots on the ground to show that condemnation in a well organized fashion. And that is very encouraging to me because we are sorely bereft of it. But that's the path forward. We can poke the government to do a few things that we very much need them to do around online harms. But we also need to talk about organizing and getting boots on the ground to shout f you and to throw the middle finger at these, you know, far right populist groups because that's part of the bigger solution to it.

The speaker discusses the distinction between ideological movements and those who engage in violent actions. They mention that Antifa operates on a decentralized level, making it difficult for law enforcement to take action. Antifa is known for organizing through social media and encrypted chats. They openly solicit donations on platforms like PayPal, Venmo, and Cash App to sustain themselves. The speaker also mentions personal observations of seeing the same individuals at protests and questioning how they maintain employment. Overall, the speaker emphasizes that Antifa is a real movement with a history of violence against innocent people.

Conservative party members stand with Canadians needing to get back to work, not those waving swastikas or the confederate flag. Elite protests must end.

We manufacture infighting to paralyze organizations instead of exposing individuals. Deep platforming denies far-right fascists public access to prevent hate speech from becoming materiality, organizing, and mobilization. It's not about exchanging ideas in the marketplace, but strategically deploying organizational energy. The belief is to shut down websites, close meetings, and physically prevent public assemblies.

The discussion centers on what defines the far right. Speaker 1 identifies two key features that far-right groups share. First, they reject or undermine what representative liberal democracy is all about, a system that accepts that a plurality of views is legitimate and should be supported and allowed. Speaker 1 suggests that many viewers would feel that the organization’s campaign methods automatically discount the views of Muslims and the rights of Muslims to hold those views. Second, beyond variations in different groups, there is a shared ultimate rejection of human equality. Speaker 1 notes that while the organization may deny being the same as groups like the American Nazis, there is a recognition of considerable variation within those parties; nevertheless, the core characteristic they share is this rejection of equality. Speaker 0 pushes back by saying that the discussion has moved from militant Islam to a broader focus on Muslims, implying that the conversation has shifted from a discussion about extremism within Islam to Muslims in general. This leads to a clarification of the perceived issue: the organization’s approach is viewed as not merely critiquing militant Islam but targeting Muslims as a group. The exchange highlights a tension between describing far-right groups as advocating for a democracy that excludes or diminishes minority rights and acknowledging the internal diversity of far-right movements. It also raises a concern about how such groups are perceived by the public in terms of whether their campaigns are seen as denying Muslims the right to hold views or participate in the political process. The dialogue emphasizes two main points about far-right ideology: a fundamental challenge to liberal, pluralistic democracy and a fundamental rejection of human equality, with an added discussion about whether the scope of critique should be directed at militant expressions of Islam or Muslims as a whole.

We need to invest in intelligence to understand who are the anti-Semites, who's funding them, what's their plans, who are the leaders. Then once we have that, we can define who is an enemy we can attack. Obviously, we're not gonna go against Islam or leftists in The United States. It's too big. We need to define very specific organization, individuals, actions that we can fight against. For example, when we talk about Islam or leftist, it's clear that Qatar is behind all that. So we need to focus on Qatar, Muslim Brotherhood, CARE in The United States. When we talk about radical left, we need to focus on the Democratic Socialists of America, which are not Democrats. They're just socialist Marxists that are using democratic means to take over the Democratic Party. Mamdani is a Democratic Socialist of America. So we need to focus on DSA. We need to focus on other radical movement, anarchist movements, People City Council of the PP Forum, a lot of organization that are being sponsored by China and by Marxist billionaires. And once we have all this information, we need to empower and mobilize an ecosystem of many organizations that we can incentivize them to work together, to share, and to fight against our common enemies. We need to invest in pro-Israel organizations, and we need to invest in pro American organization.

We are not afraid of the technocrats or the progressive left. We believe that courage is contagious and once the working class wakes up, they will inspire others to show courage as well. We want to unite Canada by installing patriotic bureaucrats in government and encouraging citizens to get involved in their communities and the democratic process. This will allow elected officials to challenge the technocrats and elites, and ultimately fix our country. Thank you.

The People's Party may not have seats in parliament, but they have significant influence over Canadian politics. They have brought taboo issues like COVID tyranny, mass immigration, gender ideology, climate alarmism, and globalism to the forefront of political conversation. By existing, they challenge the false consensus imposed by local elites, which is why the media and establishment parties want to shut them down. While getting seats in parliament is the ultimate goal, they believe it's crucial to continue growing and becoming more influential. They urge Canadians to support them in order to address key issues that threaten freedom, prosperity, and social cohesion. They dismiss claims that they are irrelevant and emphasize the power of their message. They believe Canada needs them as the true political alternative.

At the core of the left, at the core of a liberal, is someone that would use the sword if they had it. They are very violent people at their core. They always have it. They can't debate. They can't have conversation. So they'll resort to these tactics. They're gonna do everything they possibly can to try to murder this movement because they can't beat us. So they're gonna try to take weapons. And now we're very aware of that. I'm aware of it. We have to have full time security. This is not a joke. This is who these people are.

There is a small fringe minority with unacceptable views on their way to Ottawa, but they do not represent the majority of Canadians. Canadians believe in supporting each other and following scientific guidelines to protect one another. This is the best way to safeguard our freedoms, rights, and values as a country.

This video is a meeting discussing the organization of counter protests against anti-2SLGBTQIA+ events happening in Canada. The participants emphasize the importance of allies coming together to fight against hate and protect marginalized communities. They discuss the need for rapid response teams, organizing safe and effective protests, and building networks to counter the rise of hate groups. Concrete steps and plans are being discussed, including occupying the space in front of the school board to promote positive messaging and allyship. The goal is to overwhelm the numbers of hate groups and focus on positive messaging during the counter protest. Labor, community, and student groups are calling for a rally at Queen's Park on September 20th to combat hate, aiming for representation from all unions and community organizations. Resources and support are being shared, and attendees are encouraged to fill in their contact information for further communication. The meeting concludes with a call to action for attendees to sign up and join the fight against hate, aiming to build a rapid response network to combat hate in all forms.

There is going to be a need for thousands of people and millions to come into the streets. "The ultimate vision is to break with their comfort and come into the streets day after day, night after night, in the hundreds of thousands until the millions." "Last week, we released video of New York Antifa like group Refuse Fa, short for Refuse Fascism, training people how to poke people's eyes out and reframing assault as self defense." "It's not just Soros and Steyer who may have interest in groups like Refuse Fa and Antifa. It's also our friends in Silicon Valley." "Our cities are on fire." "If there was 10 to 50,000 demonstrating in those five cities, there'd be a million people." "The Electronic Frontier Foundation is the main organization that fights for Internet privacy, net neutrality."

Large American online platforms are full of racism, misogyny, antisemitism, Islamophobia, and hate. Criminals are using them to harm children. The government will act with a plan to fight crime, protect Canadians, and build safe, secure, and strong communities. The plan aims to make Canada secure and strong.

The Conservative Party of Canada, all MPs are on side with the ostriches. The Charles Darwin Foundation, one of the largest foundations on the planet is on side with the ostriches. They have given their full support, and they should be issuing something soon to the public stating such. The speaker was there to coach them on social media security—how to handle an aggressive person, deescalate conflicts, and police themselves. The RCMP's guard right now is coming down. They are openly chatting with everybody. The only thing that will shut down a chat with the RCMP here is if you pull out a camera and shove it in their face. it was a pleasurable conversation because I didn't show the camera in their face. If you guys see something online that questions start popping up in your head, send it to me.

Speaker asserts that large American online platforms have become seas of racism, misogyny, antisemitism, Islamophobia, and hate in all forms, and are used by criminals to harm children. The government promises to act and announces a plan to fight crime, protect Canadians, and build communities that are safe, secure, and strong.

Speaker points to Mike Cernovich: "this would be a good time for congressional hearings" and says "every billionaire funding far left wing extremism sorrows Bill Gates, Reid Hoffman, massive RICO investigation now. Every dollar accounted for every pass through groups financial records public." He proposes banning NGOs unless they've been vetted, audited, and made transparent; "I'm 100% in favor of the government going way more aggressive on RICO investigations for this massive criminal enterprise called Democrats." He says the risk tolerance has changed after Charlie got shot to death; "it's personal" and "RICO every one of these motherfuckers to the ground." He now believes "the Democrat Party has to be totally dismantled" and, though it would be bad for the country, asserts "we can no longer settle for the status quo." They are creating "a mortal danger to Trump supporters" and, "rip open this whole billionaire game whatever's going on there."

There is a small fringe element in this country that is angry and doesn't believe in science. They are lashing out with racist and misogynistic attacks. These voices, special interest groups, and anti-vaxxer mobs are not protesters.

Jonathan asks for commentary on Nick Fuentes, what countermeasures are effective, and what the government’s role should be in being critical of such a platform. The respondent explains that Nick Fuentes’ second name is Joseph, and that Fuentes is a Hispanic person described as an open, unapologetic racist, homophobe, and anti-Semite. He notes that Fuentes has been incredibly effective at spreading his message thanks to X and social media, which act as super spreaders of anti-Semitism and hate, making Fuentes like patient zero. He points out that it didn’t help when former President Trump had Fuentes over for dinner at Mar-a-Lago, and he criticizes those in power who don’t renounce Fuentes. JD Vance has done so, but the current right faces a challenge with elevated bad voices like Fuentes, Tucker Carlson, and Candace Owens, while there are good voices on the right such as Ted Cruz, Ben Shapiro, and Mark Levin who push back on figures like Speaker Johnson and the revolting lunatics. To defeat rising anti-Semitism on the right, he believes it must come from the right; to defeat rising anti-Zionism on the left, it must come from people on the left. At AADL, the goal is to provide data and tools and to operate behind the scenes rather than publicly targeting Fuentes or Hassan Piker; the speaker even calls Hassan Piker “Hamas Piker” and notes his large platform on Twitch, Steam, YouTube, and Instagram. The speaker emphasizes working to get platforms to enforce terms of service to pull down the most offensive hate speech, or compel action from the platforms. However, he also stresses the need for people on the right to take down figures like Tucker Carlson and Nick Fuentes, and for people on the left to support similar efforts. The second speaker adds that in a sermon about the nuance of every human being, they did not mean Nick Fuentes.

The speaker describes efforts to counter right-wing extremism by targeting its spread and influence in society and government. They assert that the ideology seeks to move into the center of society and that the extended reach of right-wing extremists extends into parliaments. The goal is to dismantle these extremist networks, deprive them of funding, and take away their weapons. The overarching use of all state legal instruments is emphasized to protect democracy, combining prevention with a firm approach. The core strategy focuses on preventing the ideology from infiltrating society and preserving democratic integrity. They reference an action plan against right-wing extremism introduced at the start of their term, claiming that nearly all measures have been implemented or are already in operation. Specific components cited include bans on right-wing extremist groups, new preventive programs, and enhanced political education. The speaker notes ongoing efforts and promises to intensify them, stating that “everywhere here we will add another layer.”

Speaker 0: Are you concerned about your supporters being harassed and subjected to racial slurs? Does it put them in a difficult position to support you? Speaker 1: I won't back down from standing up for Canadians. The election highlights the stark differences in our approaches and the important issues at hand. While there is a small fringe element that spreads hate, the majority of Canadians do not support them. They won't dictate our policies on vaccines or the pandemic. We need strong leadership to recover our economy and keep our kids safe. Aaron O'Toole seems to take cues from these groups, but Liberals will stand up for Canadians. Speaker 2: Does attending events with anti-vaxxer protesters pose a health risk? Speaker 1: Anti-vaxxers pose a risk wherever they go, not just at protests. We will implement measures to ensure the unvaccinated cannot travel, work in public service, or access nonessential services. Canadians have a choice in this election, and it's crucial to move forward in the right way. Aaron O'Toole's suggestion that testing is enough is not acceptable. Liberals will continue to stand strong on this issue alongside Canadians.

Allowing citizens to speak freely makes them stronger. This brings me to Munich, where conference organizers banned lawmakers from populist parties on both the left and the right. We don't have to agree with everything, but when political leaders represent a constituency, we should engage in dialogue. To many, it appears that entrenched interests are hiding behind terms like misinformation and disinformation. They dislike the idea of alternative viewpoints, different opinions, or, even worse, different election outcomes.