TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

We partnered with Google to address the issue of distorted information on climate change. Now, when you search for climate change on Google, you'll find reliable UN resources at the top. We believe it's important for people to have access to accurate scientific information, and we're taking a proactive approach. This is a significant challenge that requires the involvement of all sectors of society.

The speaker expresses a deep concern about climate change and ties it to their actions, noting that they built a building twelve years ago to convene discussions on the issue. They mention past collaborations, including a session with the Smith School in Oxford and other events. About ten years ago, they organized a program with Oxford University featuring Bill Clinton and David Attenborough to discuss climate change, and they emphasize that the problem is getting bigger and bigger.

The speaker sets out to “clear up” fascism, communism, and totalitarianism by arguing they are not simple opposites but rival forms arising from the same collectivist impulse. He cites Mussolini’s definition of fascism as corporatism—the merger of corporate and government power—and the view that “for the fascist, everything is the state and nothing human or spiritual exists, much less has value outside the state.” He then paraphrases Ayn Rand, saying “Fascism and communism are not two opposites, but two rival gangs fighting over the same territory” based on the collectivist principle that man is the rightless slave of the state. He notes that the Nazis’ National Socialism fused unions, industry, and state into a totalitarian system, and labels that form of totalitarianism as fascism. Turning to today, he argues Mussolini’s corporatist definition best fits recent developments, with “the corporate and governments joining into a merger” aided by the World Economic Forum (WEF), United Nations (UN), and related entities. He traces a historical lineage: in the late 1950s, the Rockefeller Brothers Fund funded the Special Studies Project, with Nelson Rockefeller and Henry Kissinger involved, aiming to “shape a new world order” across spiritual, economic, political, and social dimensions. The CFR (Council on Foreign Relations) and David Rockefeller are described as coordinating global leaders to build a globalist system, identifying global challenges—health, pandemics, population, climate change—as pathways to global governance. He emphasizes climate change as an opportunity to promote globalism, noting Harvard’s International Seminar (funded by Ford, Rockefeller, and others) and Klaus Schwab’s rise to prominence, leading to the European Economic Forum in 1971 and its evolution into the World Economic Forum (WEF). Key players and structures are listed: Barbara Ward’s push for sustainable development and climate focus; the Club of Rome and its Limits to Growth; Giovanni Agnelli linking banking and big oil with Rockefeller figures; the Davos forum’s shift to sustainability, stakeholder capitalism, and climate. He highlights funding and influence from major banks and financial institutions, the Council on Foreign Relations, Trilateral Commission, and Bilderberg participants, asserting a broad network guiding global policy. From the 1970s onward, he covers milestones: the 1972 Stockholm conference on climate, the 1987 World Commission on Environment and Development (Brundtland) and Our Common Future; Agenda 21 (1992) from Rio; Bilderberg meetings; the 1990s and 2000s’s Davos and the emergence of the Global Leaders of the WEF; the 2020 initiative and the identification of pandemics, climate risk, and digital governance as future imperatives. He notes the 2006 Global Risks report’s mention of a pandemic and misinformation, arguing they anticipated the 2020 pandemic and the censorship that followed. He argues that public-private partnerships represent totalitarianism, with “the state and corporate power” merged and “the politicians… taking orders from the top levels.” He contends the UN Global Goals and the 2019 formal joining of WEF with the UN formalize a global government, promoting the Fourth Industrial Revolution to reshape the physical world, environment, space surveillance, and digital technology. The Decade of Action (2019) culminates in a 2020 pandemic as part of a planned sequence toward global governance. He concludes that fascism, communism, and totalitarianism are effectively the same at core: “the state” or “the corporate governmental” structure controlling individuals, with “fascism and communism” as rival narratives used to advance a single collectivist end. The closing thanks acknowledge supporters and invite further contributions.

I first stumbled across agenda 21 in about 2008, and my first reaction was to dismiss what I was reading because I didn't believe that any government in Australia would take us down this road. Then I began to see a legislative pattern emerging in parliament which concerned me greatly, and I also started to see the tenor of legislation that we were passing. I did air those concerns in parliament, and it was dismissed and ignored. The words agenda 21, ladies and gentlemen, were never meant to be spoken. And if they were, then, of course, it would be dismissed as a conspiracy theory. Because if people knew agenda 21 and what it stood for, there's plenty of information out there where they could actually learn what the end game was, and governments didn't want that to be known. My dad always said to me that people only lie for two reasons. One reason is because you're ashamed of what you're doing, and the second reason is that you don't want people to be warned just before you screw them. And I honestly believe that these secrets have been kept for both of those reasons. Ladies and gentlemen, the origins of the environmental movement as we see it began back in 1968 when the Club of Rome was formed. The Club of Rome has been described as a crisis think tank which specializes in crisis creation. The main purpose of this think tank was to formulate a crisis that would unite the world and condition us to the idea of global solutions to local problems. In a document called the first global revolution authored by Alexander King and Bertrand Schneider on pages 104 and 105, it stated, in searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine, and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers, of course, will be caused by human intervention that will require a global response. That's the origin of global warming, ladies and gentlemen. In 1975, Australia agreed to bring in a new economic order via the Lima Declaration on the second conference of the United Nations Industrial Development Organization. The outcome of this was, as I said, the Lima declaration which was a blueprint for the redeployment of tools, jobs, and manufacturing to the developing nations, leaving countries like Australia short of technology, a manufacturing base, and jobs. Blind Freddy can now see what the outcome of that has been for our country with their unworkable trade and tariffs agreements hand in hand with this that have followed as a matter of course. This has now become a reality with around 90% of our agriculture and manufacturing just gone. Australia signed the Lima declaration in 1975 and hundreds of others with the support of all major political players, Whitlam, Fraser, Hawke, Keating, Houston, Howard, Rudd, the democrats, the greens, and even the Nationals. It has been put to me that all of these treaties were the foundation for the rollout of agenda 21. And it seems that Australia has been moved around the global chessboard, and our so called leaders were either complicit or naive to the long term consequences. And now we're almost at checkmate. Sorry. In 1992, former president of The United States George Bush senior said, effective execution of agenda 21 will require a profound reorientation of human society unlike anything the world has ever experienced. A major shift in the priorities of both governments and individuals and an unprecedented redeployment of human and financial resources. This shift will demand that a concern for the environmental consequences of every human action will be integrated into individual and collective decision making at every level. Cutting through the code, I want everyone here tonight not familiar with agenda 21 to consider what the words profound reorientation of all human society and unprecedented redeployment of human and financial resources actually means. For everyone here tonight not familiar with agenda 21, I would suggest that this is the beginning of your learning curve, not the end. In 1992, Morris Strong, secretary general of the UN Earth Summit and member of the Club of Rome said, it is clear the current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle class involving high meat intake, consumption of large amounts of frozen and convenience foods, use of fossil fuels, ownership of motor vehicles, small electrical appliances, home and workplace air conditioning, and suburban housing are not sustainable. Put those statements together with the previous one, and it must become clear that agenda 21 is about controlling every aspect of our lives, how we eat, what we eat, how much we eat, how we move around, food production, the amount of food, and where we even live. Dixie Ray, former Washington state governor and assistant secretary for oceans and international environmental and scientific affairs stated, agenda 21 seeks to establish a mechanism for transferring the wealth from citizens to the third world. Fear of environmental crisis would be used to create a world government and UN central direction. From a report in the September Habitat One Conference, land cannot be treated as an ordinary asset controlled by individuals and subject to the pressures and inefficiencies of the market. Private land ownership is also a principal instrument

I played a key role in getting the Paris climate accord passed. After meeting with Deng Xiaoping, I convinced China to join by applying pressure. As a result, nearly 200 nations came together to support the accord.

The pandemic has caused great harm, but the green recovery offers a chance to change how we live and do business. We must shift to a model that values nature and achieving net zero emissions for sustainable growth. After 40 years of advocating for climate action, I see progress in using market forces and private sector resources to make a difference. Time is running out, and urgent action is needed to address the crisis. It's time to act, not just talk.

As an engineer and business manager, I have never found any logical scientific evidence to worry about atmospheric gases. When hydrocarbon fuels are burned, they produce carbon dioxide and water vapor. Carbon dioxide is essential for life. Two global experiments in 2009 and 2020 showed that despite reductions in human carbon dioxide emissions, the levels in the atmosphere continued to increase. This proves that humans do not have a significant impact on carbon dioxide levels, as it is controlled by nature.

I am fully convinced about climate change. While we may not know all the causes, we suspect the sun plays a significant role. There's substantial evidence suggesting that around 90% of the influence comes from solar activity.

Speaker 0 outlines a narrative linking the origins of the environmental movement to the Club of Rome, described as a crisis think tank that purportedly specializes in crisis creation. The speaker cites a document, The First Global Revolution by Alexander King and Bertrand Schneider, claiming it states that pollution, global warming, water shortages, famine and similar dangers would fit the bill as a new enemy to unite the world and justify a global response to local problems, thereby claiming “the origin of global warming.” The speaker then connects this to Australia, asserting that in 1975 Australia accepted a new economic order via the Lima Declaration at the UNIDO conference. The Lima Declaration, they say, was a blueprint for redeploying tools, jobs and manufacturing to developing nations, leaving Australia short of technology, a manufacturing base and jobs, and that unworkable trade and tariffs agreements followed. They claim these treaties were the foundation for the rollout of Agenda 21 and contend Australia has been moved on a global chessboard with leaders either complicit or naive to long-term consequences. The segment cites 1992 remarks by former U.S. president George Bush Sr. about Agenda 21, describing it as requiring a profound reorientation of human society and an unprecedented redeployment of human and financial resources, integrating concern for environmental consequences into decision making at every level. The speaker urges the audience to consider the implications of “profound reorientation of all human society” and “unprecedented redeployment of human and financial resources.” The speaker references Morris Strong, then secretary-general of the UN Earth Summit, stating that affluent middle-class lifestyles are not sustainable, including high meat intake, frozen foods, fossil fuels, vehicle ownership, and other consumption patterns. The implication drawn is that Agenda 21 is about controlling every aspect of life—what and how we eat, how we move, food production, quantity of food, and where we live. Dixie Ray, former Washington state governor and assistant secretary for oceans and international environmental and scientific affairs, is quoted as saying Agenda 21 seeks to transfer wealth from citizens to the third world. A fear-based trajectory is described where fear of environmental crisis would be used to create a world government with UN central direction. The speaker quotes a Habitat One report suggesting land cannot be treated as an ordinary asset and that private land ownership contributes to social injustice, implying a redistribution of wealth through land and resource control. A report from the president’s council on sustainable development is cited as advocating a new collaborative decision process for better decisions and more rapid change in resource use. Harvey Ruben of the Wildlands Project and Jay Gary Lawrence are invoked to suggest that individual rights would be subordinated to the collective, and that participating in UN-planned processes would provoke conspiracy-minded groups to resist, leading to alternative labels like comprehensive planning or sustainable development. The narrative claims that costs are rising for citizens while services are cut, portraying this as wealth redistribution and redeployment of resources that harms the working poor. It references debates over land rights and water allocation, the native vegetation act, and development and planning acts as threats to food producers and long-term security, with alluding to heritage status used to justify control over land titles. The speaker argues for legislative Council checks and balances as a safeguard against parties colluding to pass restrictive policies, urging public participation to restrain erosion of common law, and portraying agenda 21 as an ongoing threat since 2008. The account then traces the Club of Rome’s 1972 Limits to Growth and its environmental alarmism, linking Ted Turner and Mao to early endorsements of the movement, and cites 1987 and 1996 statements about a new world order and an environmental crisis unlocking a one-world government. It asserts the Earth Summit produced the Earth Charter, co-written by Morris Strong and Mikhail Gorbachev, as a new set of commandments with environmentalism as a new world religion, and connects this to Agenda 21. Ted Turner’s 1996 reductionist population statements are included, along with a 1998 Baltimore Sun report on Turner’s donations to the UN aimed at stalling population growth and supporting sterilization to “save mother earth.”

I have been involved in climate change for 25 years, starting in 1973. I was the one who first gave the Club of Rome a major platform. I share your concerns and believe we can address these issues by fixing our global architecture and system.

The speaker states that they partnered with Google because, initially, Googling "climate change" yielded "incredibly distorted information" at the top of search results. As a result of the partnership, UN resources now appear at the top of Google searches for climate change. The speaker asserts that they "own the science" related to climate change and believe "the world should know it." The speaker also indicates that the platforms themselves are taking action on this issue.

I was involved in policy determination, but it's hard to say if I became too involved. While I'm associated with a specific policy, the reality was more complex. I never explicitly said we should take action immediately. Instead, I sometimes went beyond my scientific advisory role to make people aware of the potential consequences of current trends.

I'm a skeptic about climate change, not a denier. It's important to clarify that I am a scientist, while the CEO of the Weather Channel is not. There is no scientific consensus on climate change; science is based on facts, not votes. The evidence shows that significant man-made global warming is not occurring now, has not occurred in the past, and is unlikely to happen in the future. This issue has become politicized, particularly by the Democratic Party, which I regret. However, I believe the scientific facts support my position. I'm glad to have the opportunity to share my views with your audience.

Earth's climate also changes pretty radically over the course of like say ten thousand years. You know, it can shift from being extremely hot to extremely cold. You can really go down a deep rabbit hole if you read about ice ages. That that that how much Earth's climate has changed and even where the where the magnetically where the poles are have has shifted over time. So on the climate change issue, I'm fully convinced. After all these years, even though we may not know exactly what is causing climate change, we suspect it's the sun. We have a lot of evidence to show that it's probably the sun. Very high percentage, you know, like, I would say, 90%, we're sure.

I have 25 years of experience working on climate change, starting in 1973 when I gave the Club of Rome a major platform. I share your concerns and believe that the only way to address these issues is by fixing our global architecture and system.

Not an expert, but a concerned citizen. Thousands marched in New York, joined by billions worldwide, to address the climate crisis. As an actor, I solve fictional problems, but climate change is not fiction. Pretending it doesn't exist won't make it disappear. We all know better than that.

This conference is crucial in our efforts to save our planet. It holds extraordinary power to alter our current trajectory and create a better world. As a representative of We The 15, I urge you to take action and join us in this mission. Together, we can make a significant difference. This is my message from Earth to Come.

My climate crusade has been the most successful of all my crusades. Many geologists support it because they understand geological and climate history. Today's climate is not extreme or new, with minor fluctuations and moderate temperatures. Even if it warms up, we may benefit.

We need to provide better tools to poor farmers to combat climate change. I became aware of this issue while visiting Africa and witnessing the devastating effects of temperature increase on crops, leading to malnutrition and increased deaths. By utilizing gene sequencing, AI, and satellite data, we can enhance the productivity and resilience of all crops, not just mainstream ones. This will greatly improve the lives of over 500 million farmers. Scaling up these improvements is crucial, and prioritizing high-impact interventions, similar to how we prioritize health interventions, is essential. Today marks a significant milestone in accelerating innovation for climate adaptation.

I have 25 years of experience working on climate change, starting in 1973 when I gave the club of Rome a major platform. I share your concerns and believe that the only way to address these issues is by fixing our global architecture and system.

I attended the World Economic Forum in Davos in 2013 and realized that everyone there represents corporations, governments, or NGOs - no individuals. This future where people have no personal ideas or the freedom to think differently is something I oppose.

I attended the World Economic Forum in Davos in 2013 and realized that everyone there represented corporations, governments, or NGOs, with no individuals present. This lack of individuality in shaping the future is concerning to me. I reject a future where people have no independent thoughts or the ability to challenge the status quo.

Hi, I'm Hillary Clinton, and I'm committed to raising awareness about climate change and its potential impact on our lives. It's crucial that we take action immediately.

Climate change is real and I believe that carbon and methane emissions contribute to global warming. I have personally witnessed the effects of climate change through melting ice caps, mass migration of animals, and changes in the timing of seasonal events. However, I agree that this crisis is being exploited by powerful entities, such as intelligence agencies and billionaires, to gain more control and power. A war on carbon won't solve the problem, but instead, we should focus on using free markets to transition to sustainable energy sources. If you want to support my presidential campaign, visit Kennedy2020.com and donate.

I'm the only person on the stage who isn't bought and paid for, so I can say this: the climate change agenda is a hoax. We need to declare an independent rule and acknowledge that the anti-carbon agenda is dampening our progress.