TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

Speaker 0 asked Speaker 1 if they had a personal relationship with Donald Trump, clarifying if they had socialized with him. Speaker 1 answered affirmatively. Speaker 0 then asked if Speaker 1 had ever socialized with Donald Trump in the presence of females under the age of 18. Speaker 1 invoked their Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights and declined to answer the question.

Jeffrey Edward Epstein, the speaker, is asked to confirm his identity and swear to tell the truth. He admits to being convicted of two counts related to soliciting prostitution and procuring a minor for prostitution. When asked about soliciting a minor for prostitution in various locations, including Florida, the Virgin Islands, New York, New Mexico, and Paris, Epstein repeatedly invokes his Fifth Amendment right. The deposition is terminated at this point.

It's about how women think. Is that a justification for the wrongs done against young women? I've always believed women should take charge. Federal prosecutors stated that the video of Epstein's first suicide attempt in jail no longer exists. By 16, I had introduced him to 75 girls. You own two islands, right? Money is just numbers to you. How many houses do you have? I don't know. The greatest threat for those in solitary confinement is self-harm. Being confined to a room for 24 hours can drive someone to madness.

Speaker 0 recounts an interaction with Donald Trump, who asked about her because she reminded him of his daughter; 'she's 13 as well.' He knew it the first time he saw me, and came over angry because I was crying, saying that I should be thankful that someone like Donald Trump took my virginity. Rohi basically didn't say took my virginity. He said, 'I should be glad that someone like Donald Trump popped my cherry and not some pimply little 14 year old.' I asked, what if I I you know, I said, what if I get pregnant? I'm not even talking to him. I didn't wanna talk to him. I was talking to Tiffany. And he said, 'well, you'll get an abortion then, bitch.' And then just walked away. 'Why the Jeffrey Epstein case would be of interest to anybody? It's pretty boring stuff.' It's sorted, but it

There is disbelief that influential people could be involved in an island where they engage in sex with underage individuals. The speaker mentions Jeffrey Epstein, who went to jail for this crime but still had connections with people like Bill Gates. Epstein later died under suspicious circumstances, and no one was held accountable. Ghislaine Maxwell, who was involved in this illegal activity, was arrested and convicted, but the list of people involved was not released. The speaker expresses frustration, stating that this kind of injustice shouldn't happen in the United States, regardless of the individuals' power.

Jeffrey Edward Epstein, the speaker, is asked to confirm his identity and address. He admits to being convicted of soliciting prostitution and procuring a minor for prostitution. When asked about soliciting a minor for prostitution in various locations, he repeatedly invokes his 5th Amendment right. The deposition is terminated at this point.

I was asked about my relationship with Jeffrey Epstein. I've said many times I shouldn't have had dinners with him. It was just dinner, nothing more. Regarding my divorce, my ex-wife has stated that my meetings with Epstein were a problem in our marriage. She made it clear she didn't like them. She even met Epstein once to see who he was but regretted it immediately, describing him as "abhorrent" and "evil personified," and had nightmares afterwards. I don't know why I kept seeing him. I am a rich man, but that's not a reason to take me seriously.

The unredacted Epstein files have been shown on Capitol Hill, with Ro Khanna and Thomas Massey beginning to view them. The discussion centers on why large portions of the documents were redacted by the DOJ and why Pam Bondi may not have complied with the Epstein Transparency Act. An ad aired during the Super Bowl urging transparency and truth about the victims and the case is referenced. Ghislain Maxwell, Epstein’s associate, appeared before Congress and pleaded the fifth when asked direct questions. Ro Khanna summarized his view of Maxwell’s deposition: after listening to her refusal to answer questions about the men who raped underage girls, she should be sent back to maximum security rather than stay in a country club setting. The conversation then returns to why the DOJ did not release the names of clients and coconspirators, with Massey highlighting the failure to release those names as a core issue. Former Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene appeared on Redacted to speak about the Epstein files. She emphasized the victims’ desire for transparency and the public’s right to know the truth, noting the files illustrate violence and possible murder, far beyond what initial perceptions suggested. Greene stated that the release of the files has shown the American people more than many can handle, and she argued that the DOJ is breaking the law by redacting certain names and deleting or redacting information in ways that protect the powerful. She also asserted that the files reveal a vast cover-up involving rich and powerful elites, and she tied the issue to a broader theory of an international deep state. Greene claimed that the problem is not just with individuals like Pam Bondi, but that “the man at the top is Donald Trump,” who she said initially opposed releasing the files and labeled the release a “democrat hoax.” She argued that Bondi works for Trump and that the FBI and other agencies operate under the president’s authority, making independent action difficult. She asserted that the president’s stance has influenced the pace and scope of disclosures, and that those who press for release face political backlash. She also described her confrontation with the two-party system as a “political industrial complex” that punishes dissidents, detailing how Massey and others have faced political and professional retaliation. Greene reflected on the personal cost of pushing for disclosure, recounting the pressure and the “knife in the back” she has felt from colleagues across the aisle. She described the political environment as a “blood sport” in which those pushing for transparency are isolated, while the system rewards conformity. She criticized neocon Republicans and asserted that governance is driven by fear and fundraising rather than principled action. She indicated that, for her, the Epstein issue underscores broader frustrations with Washington and the perceived inability of independent actors to enact change within a two-party framework. Regarding potential remedies, the discussion touched on the possibility of an independent counsel. Greene suggested that the American people themselves are the independent counsel, explaining that trust in politicians to appoint such counsel is limited. She expressed skepticism that the Epstein files will yield accountability, noting that the president warned that “his friends would get hurt.” She stated she does not expect significant resignations or indictments of major figures, including those connected to Israel, but underscored the desire for full transparency and justice for the victims. When asked about listing the names seen in the documents, Greene clarified that the list is held by the women involved and that reading it publicly could expose them to costly lawsuits; she did not have the list herself.

Dershowitz, a longtime friend, represented Epstein in his underage sex case. Dershowitz claims he never saw a young underage woman. However, Epstein's former butler swore under oath that Dershowitz was at Epstein's residences at the same time underage girls were there. Dershowitz stated he has no idea if young women were giving massages in another part of the house when he wasn't around. Dershowitz said he once received a massage at Epstein's mansion, but from an adult woman, and that he kept his underwear on during the massage.

I was horrified that Ghilan Maxwell had been transferred to what's called a a low security it's it's really is like a like a holiday camp, and that a Department of Justice notification arrived after it had happened. "This woman abused children. I was abused by Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell for over ten years. Ghislaine Maxwell was present for some of my abuse at the hand of Jeffrey Epstein." "She was present. She was complicit. She was enabling, and it is appalling and disgusting." "And it's one of my worst nightmares that she not only be transferred, but at the possibility that's very much going around that she might be pardoned." "This is not okay, guys. This is not okay." "To to our country, to the young people in our country that someone that we all know is aware of these crimes could be given a pass." "Epstein would brag about her relationship with Donald Trump." "My first trip to the Palm Beach residence, I drove there from the airport with Gilen Maxwell, and they Jeffrey and Gilen were always very boastful about their friends, their"

Speaker 0, Jeffrey Edward Epstein and my residence address is 6100 Red Hook Boulevard in Virgin Islands. Speaker 1: Is it true that you forced Virginia Roberts to have sex with numerous friends of yours? Speaker 0: Wouldn't love my fifth amendment right. Speaker 2: You had a number of meetings with Jeffrey Epstein, who, when you met him ten years ago, he was convicted of soliciting prostitution from minors. Speaker 3: And, you know, I've said I regretted having those dinners regretted having those dinners. We did what we did because we wanted to see Epstein go to jail. He needed to go to jail. Were there young women in another part of the house giving massages, when I wasn't around? I have no idea of that. Speaker 1: Sent him three 12 year old girls from France who spoke no English for defendant to sexually exploit and abuse. After doing so, they were sent back to France the next day. Speaker 0: Please, they never saw a young underage woman. Speaker 3: You know, those meetings were were a mistake. They didn't result in what he purported, and I cut them off. You know, that goes back a long time ago now. There's you know, so there's nothing new on that. Speaker 2: We now know that he was and had been procuring young girls for sex trafficking. Speaker 0: We now know that. At the time, there was no indication to me or anybody else. I kept my underwear on during the massage. I don't like massages particularly. Speaker 3: If we had had more transparency, perhaps this case would have gone differently. Speaker 2: It was reported that you continued to meet with him over several years. Speaker 3: You know, I had dinners with him. I regret doing that. Speaker 0: You have what's been described as an egg shaped penis. Speaker 3: Well, he's dead. So, you know, in general, you always have to be careful.

The speaker, Jeffrey Edward Epstein, is asked to confirm his identity and address. He admits to being convicted of soliciting prostitution and procuring a minor for prostitution. When questioned about soliciting a minor for prostitution in various locations, he repeatedly invokes his Fifth Amendment right. The deposition is terminated at this point.

The speaker defends himself against allegations and claims to have nothing to hide. He offers to release all evidence to prove his innocence. The interviewer brings up the association with Jeffrey Epstein, to which the speaker explains that he and his wife had massages at Epstein's house but denies any wrongdoing. He mentions that many prominent individuals also had massages there and that his friendship with Epstein was purely academic. The speaker argues that having a massage does not make him guilty and that the person making the allegations has admitted to possible mistaken identification. He concludes by stating that he and his wife are innocent.

The speaker defends himself against allegations and claims to have nothing to hide. He offers to release all evidence to prove his innocence. The interviewer brings up the association with Jeffrey Epstein, to which the speaker explains that he and his wife had massages at Epstein's house, but denies any wrongdoing. He mentions that many prominent individuals also had massages there and that his friendship with Epstein was purely academic. The speaker argues that having a massage does not make him guilty and that the person accusing him has admitted to possible mistaken identification. He asserts his innocence and states that neither he nor his wife are guilty.

Jeffrey Epstein is accused of sexually abusing young girls at his mansions in Florida and New York, facing two counts of sex trafficking. He allegedly trafficked underage girls to his private island, often referred to as "pedophile island." Notable figures like Bill Clinton and Prince Andrew were among those who flew on Epstein's private jet. After Epstein's death by suicide in jail, concerns arose about the motives of those connected to him. Reports revealed Bill Gates met with Epstein multiple times and was involved in a charitable fund with him post-conviction. Many powerful individuals, including celebrities and politicians, were linked to Epstein, raising questions about their involvement in his crimes. Despite widespread knowledge of Epstein's actions, there was a lack of legal action against him, suggesting complicity among elites and media.

I met Donald Trump at Jeffrey Epstein's mansion when I was 13. During a party, he asked me for a sexual act, and although I was uncomfortable, my recruiter insisted I comply. He insisted I use a glove before I proceeded. Afterward, he left, and I didn't see him again that night. I had come to New York to model and was recruited by a girl named Tiffany, who introduced me to these parties. Epstein, aware of my age, made inappropriate advances toward me. He seemed to prefer younger girls and was aware I was a virgin. It felt like he wanted to have first access to me before anyone else.

He traveled multiple times with Jeffrey Epstein on the "Lolita Express," which allegedly had a bed for young girls. Unlike Donald Trump, who distanced himself from Epstein over a decade ago, this individual has maintained a long-term friendship with him. There are concerns about the Justice Department's silence on this issue, especially while they label parents as domestic terrorists. Human trafficking is a significant problem, and while Epstein is dead and Ghislaine Maxwell is imprisoned, some individuals mentioned in reports are still trying to keep their names private without a valid legal reason, unless they are victims or cooperating defendants in a case against Maxwell.

- The questioning begins with noting a calendar or schedule, then moves to record-keeping instructions: "Turn off the video record at 01:05PM." - Mister Epstein is asked about sexual attraction to underage minor females. The question is objected to as harassing and argumentative. - Epstein invokes his rights: he states he must invoke his fifth, sixth, and fourteenth amendment rights to not answer questions today or any questions relevant to this lawsuit. - The questions focus on the names of any underage minors who were the subject of criminal charges to which Epstein pled guilty. Epstein responds, "I don't know." - The examiner asks what the charges were about and what the underlying allegations were. Epstein states the charge as "Solicitation of prostitution," clarifying it was not underage prostitution but prostitution. - The examiner asks if the victims or prostitutes were minors. Epstein repeats, "I plead guilty to solicitation of prostitution." - The examiner presses for details of the cases—what happened, what the underlying facts were, how Epstein engaged with the individuals. Epstein repeats that he cannot tell more than that and ultimately says, "I plead guilty to the solicitation of prostitution. Not underage prostitution, but prostitution." - The examiner asks to clarify whether the three females who were the subject of the guilty pleas in state court were procured by Epstein by having underage minor females locate other underage minor females and bring them to Epstein’s house. Objections are raised for argumentative, harassing, and assuming facts not in evidence; the examiner moves to strike. - The examiner asks whether all people with whom Epstein engaged in sexual activity were underage and brought by other underage girls. Objections persist; Epstein states he does not understand the question. - The examiner repeats a question about whether Epstein used underage minor females to bring other underage minor females to his house for sex; the exchange indicates the question had been asked and answered earlier. - Epstein again states, due to his counsel, that he must assert his sixth, fourteenth, and fifth amendment rights and cannot answer that question at the moment. - In closing, Epstein cites that his firm, Edwards and Jaffee, has been described by the US attorney as perpetrating one of the largest frauds in South Florida’s history, crafting malicious cases of a sexual nature to fleece people using bogus schemes and investment schemes. He reiterates his attorneys advised he must assert his constitutional rights, and therefore he cannot answer at this time.

Jeffrey Edward Epstein, the speaker, is asked to confirm his identity and address. He admits to being convicted of soliciting prostitution and procuring a minor for prostitution. When asked about soliciting a minor for prostitution in various locations, including Florida, the Virgin Islands, New York, New Mexico, and Paris, Epstein invokes his Fifth Amendment right. The deposition is terminated at this point.

Speaker 0 explains that Epstein’s legal problems began with police investigations into allegations that underage women were coming to Epstein’s house. Epstein allegedly believed that Trump was the first to inform the police about what was happening at Epstein’s house, and from that point they became bitter enemies. Speaker 1 asks if this is what Epstein is telling him. Speaker 0 confirms that this is the version he is relaying, as presented by “Oh, the hoax yesterday.” Speaker 2 clarifies that “the hoax” refers to Democrats using a narrative to attack him. He says Epstein has never said or suggested or implied that the hoax is real; he has talked to Epstein many times. He states that the whole thing comes across as a hoax, not that Epstein’s actions are a hoax. He explains that Epstein believes himself innocent, and that when he first heard the rumor, he kicked him out of Maribago. He adds that Epstein was an FBI informant trying to take this matter down. The president knows and has great sympathy for the women who have suffered harms; it’s detestable to him. He and the speaker have spoken as recently as twenty-four hours ago. What he is talking about, according to Speaker 2, are the Democrats who are pursuing this with impure motives. If they truly cared, he asks, why didn’t they act during the four years of the Biden administration when the Biden DOJ had all the records? They didn’t say a word about it, and now they pursue it for political purposes. Speaker 3 notes that our current president has had relationships with Epstein in the past, and mentions Katie Johnson and possibly other victims who have accused Trump of involvement in similar matters. In the speaker’s experience, Trump supporters will not listen to such claims. He admits the court of law isn’t present here. He asks if there is anything that can be said about the validity of those claims or whether more is known. Speaker 1 responds that he can say nothing at all. He states that the only thing he can say about President Trump is that in 2009, when he served subpoenas and gave notice to connected people that he wanted to talk to them, Trump was the only person who picked up the phone and said, “let’s just talk.” Trump offered as much time as needed, provided information that checked out, and helped him so they didn’t have to depose him. He adds that this occurred in 2009. Speaker 3 asks if there is any truth to James Patterson’s claims that Trump kicked Epstein out of Mar-a-Lago. Speaker 1 confirms that he definitely heard that.

Speaker 0 asked Speaker 1 if they ever had a personal relationship with Donald Trump, clarifying if they socialized with him. Speaker 1 answered affirmatively. Speaker 0 then asked if Speaker 1 ever socialized with Donald Trump in the presence of females under the age of 18. Speaker 1 invoked their Fifth, Sixth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights and declined to answer the question.

Prince Andrew denies any involvement in the activities of Jeffrey Epstein and maintains that he did not have any sexual encounters with Virginia Roberts. He claims that he stayed at Epstein's house out of convenience and that his judgment was clouded by his sense of honor. He denies sweating or having any recollection of the specific events described by Roberts. He acknowledges being in a photograph with her but cannot explain it. He also denies any knowledge of suspicious behavior or underage girls at Epstein's residences. Prince Andrew states that he would be willing to testify under oath if legally advised to do so. He emphasizes that he is focused on his philanthropic work and moving forward.

Jeffrey Epstein had a vault on his island containing secretive information and videos of people engaged in sexual conduct. Despite being rich, he managed to evade consequences for his actions. Some speculate that intelligence agencies like Mossad or a mysterious black ops group were involved. The charges against Epstein were limited to paying underage girls for massages, which seemed underwhelming compared to expectations. The speaker, a lawyer, found the indictment lacking in substantial evidence.

During a deposition, a witness was asked if he had what was described as an egg-shaped penis. Another individual stated he hired psychologists to profile Jeffrey Epstein, finding him to be a narcissist lacking empathy who saw himself as a master of puppets, needing to be in control. The witness was then asked if it was true that a friend of Epstein sent him three 12-year-old girls from France who spoke no English for him to sexually exploit and abuse on one of his birthdays, after which they were sent back to France the next day. The witness stated that his attorneys advised him to assert his fifth, sixth, and fourteenth amendment rights. He was then asked if he was invoking his fifth amendment rights because his answers would incriminate him and could result in prosecution for these crimes.

In the discussion, Congressmen Ro Khanna and Thomas Massie were shown viewing the unredacted Epstein files on Capitol Hill, including material that had been previously redacted by the DOJ. The hosts question why large portions of the files were redacted and accuse Pam Bondi’s team of noncompliance with the Epstein Transparency Act. They suggest the move to foreground Bondi is a signal of political maneuvering to manage the release of the documents. Speaker 1 presents a Super Bowl ad urging the DOJ to release what the law requires, followed by a note that Epstein’s associate and alleged child sex trafficking figure Ghislain (Ghislaine) Maxwell appeared before Congress and invoked the Fifth Amendment when asked about the men who allegedly abused underage girls. Ro Khanna’s reaction is shared: Maxwell should not be in a cushy setting and should be sent back to maximum security. Speaker 2 emphasizes that, of the files released, the names of clients and coconspirators in the sex trafficking ring have not been disclosed, while victims’ names have been released. This is framed as either over-redaction or omission, with a claim that government names should not be redacted under the Transparency Act. Speaker 0 introduces Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, who explains her perspective. She notes the urgency of transparency and states that victims deserve the truth, accusing the DOJ of failing to comply with the Epstein Transparency Act and calling out a persistent “battle” over the release of files even after the 2025 law. Speaker 3 (Greene) describes the impact of the disclosures, noting that the files reveal “violence, possibly murder,” and that survivors’ testimonies are harrowing. She recounts facing personal and political backlash for pushing disclosure, arguing that the administration and many Republicans have shifted their positions since the revelations. She asserts that the released files show that “the DOJ breaking the law” through redactions of names of former presidents, secretaries of state, and government officials, while leaving victim information exposed. Speaker 4 asks Greene about the possibility that the information might point to a broader, deeper network. Greene responds by stating that the files include FBI forms about Epstein, implying a level of official involvement, and asserts that the Trump administration has not released the information; she claims President Trump referred to the Epstein issue as a “Democrat hoax” and that Pam Bondi, who works for Trump, controls the release. Greene suggests the “independent counsel” would be the American people themselves, explaining distrust toward political figures and the two-party system. She shares that she would not vote to support foreign aid or a central bank digital currency, and notes the chilling effect of the retaliation she and Massey have faced from party structures, including loss of campaign staff and suggestions of political blacklisting. Speaker 0 asks about potential accountability or a special counsel and whether there might be more significant revelations. Greene predicts limited accountability, arguing that the president has influence over DOJ and other agencies, and that the people are the true independent counsel. She laments the “uni-party” dynamic and predicts continued resistance to releasing the full Epstein files. Towards the end, Greene reiterates that she does not plan to run for higher office and reflects on the broader political environment, emphasizing that the public’s demand for transparency could drive change. The dialogue closes with Greene expressing willingness to return and discuss further.