reSee.it - Related Video Feed

The food supply is being shut down worldwide, with livestock being culled and farmlands bought up. Restrictions on water usage and backyard farming are increasing. The goal is to reduce carbon emissions, but it's destroying the ability to produce meat and fish. This is seen as a war against nature and humanity.

Electric cars are expensive and will be used to control where people can and cannot go. Unlike traditional cars, autonomous electric cars will be computer-driven and will only take passengers where they are allowed to go. The goal is not to save the planet from climate change, but rather to impose control over people's movements. The idea is to replace petrol and diesel cars with electric ones in order to limit people's freedom and decide where they can travel. The claim of saving the planet is just an excuse.

France has banned short-haul flights within the country to reduce carbon emissions, a move that may soon reach the United States. This decision, although symbolic and not impactful on CO2 emissions, is part of a larger global effort to restrict travel and fulfill the World Economic Forum's vision of a world where people own nothing and are happy. The ban on short-haul flights forces people into cars, which are statistically more dangerous than planes. This trend is spreading across Europe and is expected to be adopted by Canada. The goal is to create a flying-free world with travel restrictions similar to those in East Germany. The focus is now shifting to agriculture and transportation, with plans to ban gas-powered cars and create intentional car shortages. The ultimate aim is to limit vacations and seaside travel to only the wealthy, effectively abolishing the middle class. This climate agenda is driven by a religious-like fanaticism and is imposed without democratic processes, similar to the COVID-19 restrictions.

The speaker discusses the symbolic significance of the increase in property tax in relation to Emmanuel Macron's political philosophy. Macron aims for a society where no one owns anything, as seen through his previous actions of abolishing the wealth tax and replacing it with a real estate tax. This ideology attacks citizens' ability to establish roots and make independent financial decisions. The speaker also highlights the contradiction between the government's claim of improving purchasing power during a period of inflation and the increase in taxation. Various taxes and levies, such as those on highways, airports, airfare, eco-contributions, non-road diesel, alcohol, and more, will burden the already struggling French population.

BlackRock has purchased £1,400,000,000 worth of UK homes, and Lloyds Bank aims to own 50,000 homes by 1930. Massive institutions are buying up UK homes, potentially leading to a society where homeownership is unattainable and people are forced to rent. The next fifteen to twenty years may represent the last opportunity to buy a home. Renters will not be able to negotiate with massive US private equity firms, where they are just a line item. Multinationals are buying up all of the homes in the UK.

The 15 minute cities plan by c40 cities will ban petrol and diesel cars, implement calorie-controlled food systems, and freeze bank accounts for non-compliance. The WEF and London mayor are pushing this globally. It's seen as a form of control, leading to a future where work is limited to within these cities. This plan is concerning and not widely discussed.

Governments have an ESG agenda and use money to control the population. Public opinion is also a tool for control. Money is essential for navigating society, so limiting spending can influence behavior. For example, only 10% of wages can be used for petrol or buying meat. These measures are presented as beneficial for society.

The 15-minute city initiative by c40 cities will ban petrol and diesel cars, control food intake, and freeze bank accounts for non-compliance. The WEF and WBF are pushing this agenda globally, with London's mayor as the chair. This plan is concerning as it restricts freedom and could lead to a lifetime of limitations. It's a hidden agenda that needs more public awareness.

The government will soon send letters requiring homeowners to make costly improvements to their houses, while landlords will increase rent due to rising costs. This is a result of the energy performance of buildings directive, which aims to have all privately owned houses at energy class d by 2033 and zero emission homes by 2050. The estimated cost per house is around €100,000, forcing many to sell. This threatens the middle class and could lead to a feudal system, with big international companies seizing properties. It is crucial to resist and refuse to accept this wealth transfer, as ownership is essential. Disobedience is necessary, despite the consequences.

When all else fails, they take you to war, and the climate hoax is an effective tool. In the name of saving the planet, they will take food, cars, gas boilers, and air travel. Land seized from farmers will be used for wind turbines and solar panels, which won't provide reliable energy, potentially leading to a new dark age. The production of turbines and panels uses oil, gas, and coal, requiring the mining of rare earth metals and minerals, destroying habitats and ecosystems. Mining for lithium, cobalt, cadmium, copper, and lead may increase by 2,000%. While coal mines are shut, other mines are opening to obtain materials for batteries. Child slaves give their lives for cobalt used in electric batteries. When turbines and solar panels reach the end of their lives, they can't be recycled and are buried in landfill sites, leaking lead, cadmium, and other toxins into the soil and water supply. This is driven by greed, benefiting the few and denying the many, after years of brainwashing people into thinking the Earth is about to catch fire.

There is a push towards globalization and centralization of control by unelected officials. The goal is to collapse liberal democracy and replace it with global technocracy, controlling all resources. This involves controlling with rules, potentially eliminating currency, and creating a system where access is restricted. Strategies include commandeering land, reducing farming, changing food, transforming electricity supply, and replacing currency with credits, all justified by a climate crisis caused by carbon dioxide. Some claim there is no climate crisis and that governments want a catastrophic narrative, with no conclusive proof humans control the global climate. Europe's net zero policies are seen as economic suicide, impoverishing people and de-industrializing the continent. This is described as a global war on agriculture leading to food shortages. The plan involves switching to "pharma food" for complete control of the agriculture industry. This is described as a public relations scam and a blueprint to radically change all life on Earth, monitoring every human action. Once digital IDs are in place, it's "game over for humanity."

The EU is working on a draft law that could lead to the expropriation of older residential buildings that don't meet energy efficiency standards. By 2030, these buildings may no longer be used, meaning owners can't live in them or rent them out. This follows the logic of German economics minister Robert Hebeck, who believes certain industries may stop producing instead of going bankrupt. Landlords who own multiple apartment buildings but can't afford to renovate them energetically will no longer be allowed to rent them out, resulting in a loss of rental income and worthless real estate. This could lead to foreclosure and financial ruin. The state can easily forbid property use, leaving owners with no choice but to comply. Many owners of older buildings can't afford the necessary renovations, which can cost thousands of dollars. Energetic renovations are also seen as a scam. The speaker, who used to specialize in affordable housing, has sold all their properties and plans to start anew in a country with fewer climate initiatives. The prospects look bleak unless one starts a business focused on energy-efficient renovations.

The C40 consortium, made up of 40 major cities, aims for citizens to only have 3 articles of clothing, 95% reduction in private car ownership, and limited flights. This could greatly impact industries and living standards. Some believe this green agenda may sacrifice the working class and poor for environmental goals.

The speaker argues that five years ago the WEF claimed we would own nothing by 2030, tied to the UN Agenda 2030, with digital ID as a key component. They question how ownership has shifted toward non-ownership in that period. They point to homeownership: ownership in homes has remained flat over the last five years while rent has skyrocketed, with a claimed increase of 5,600,000.0. As a result, homeownership is expected to decline, and younger generations, particularly Gen Z, are described as priced out and the largest generation ever to be renting. The speaker claims many goods and services are moving to subscription models. They note that vehicles are adopting subscription features from brands like Toyota, Mercedes, and BMW, and that farming equipment from John Deere can be shut down if a subscription service is not maintained, with mechanics needed to fix issues tied to that service. Printer ink subscriptions are cited with HP, asserting that canceling the ink subscription would cause the printer to stop functioning. They argue that media, movies, and music have moved to streaming services, and ownership is eroded because items are stored in cloud rather than in the user’s possession. CDs and DVDs are gone, and gaming systems can be shut down if the user’s behavior is not acceptable. Software previously owned, such as Adobe Creative Suite, Quicken, and Microsoft Office, is now offered on a subscription basis, so users no longer own the software but pay to use it regularly. Ebooks are also hosted on Kindle, with a specific claim that in 2009 Amazon removed George Orwell’s books from some users’ digital libraries. The speaker asserts that such controls illustrate how digital content can be removed. They argue that digital ID would enable even broader control, allowing authorities to shut users down or deny access to services. The speaker emphasizes that incremental steps are leading toward owning nothing and paying regularly for access to services that were once purchased outright. They claim social media platforms can suspend users for things they disapprove of, reinforcing the potential reach of this agenda. The overall conclusion presented is that this is the direction of Agenda 2030 and how ownership is being eroded.

Housing prices and interest rates have doubled, making homes unaffordable due to large companies like BlackRock buying up properties. Nearly 30% of new home purchases are by investors, not individuals. This shift from ownership to renting erodes community ties and turns citizens into subjects. Homeownership fosters community involvement and care for neighbors, police, firefighters, and teachers.

They're aggressively ramping up control as more people awaken to the situation. This urgency stems from a closing window of opportunity, leading to louder critical voices. Current issues include the establishment of "15-minute ghettos" in places like Great Britain and Ireland, and the suppression of farmers, which threatens food production. The sudden acquisition of farmland by figures like Bill Gates raises concerns about food control and its implications for the populace. Additionally, the push for digital identity and currency is about government control, reminiscent of China's social credit system. This could lead to severe consequences, such as losing access to resources if one refuses certain mandates. Overall, the trajectory points toward a totalitarian surveillance state.

In 2023, private equity firms, specifically BlackRock, accounted for 44% of single-family home purchases. This trend is impacting people's ability to buy homes, as BlackRock aims to create a world where ownership is impossible. They want to control what you can purchase by putting everything on debt. This means you may not own a home, a car, or even the clothes you wear. Their goal is to destroy permanence and the family structure, aiming to atomize and dehumanize individuals for easier control.

Several speakers present a cohesive, alarmist view of a global move toward centralized, technocratic governance: - A long-standing desire to control others is fueling a push toward globalization and centralization of power in unelected officials at supranational bodies. They claim the aim is to have all the world’s resources “in their pocket.” - The larger project is described as an attempt to collapse liberal democracy and replace it with a global technocracy. A “coup” is alleged, with the argument that rules could replace currency, creating a system of control without money. - The situation is likened to an inverted prison: people may seem free to roam, but “everything you want to access is behind lock and key.” The potential for social control is described as gigantic and potentially irreversible. - The plan reportedly includes commandeering land, reducing farming, radically changing the food we eat, transforming the electricity supply, and dictating how it is used, while replacing currency with a system of credits. All three strategies are said to be premised on a climate-crisis narrative centered on carbon dioxide. - One speaker disputes the climate-crisis premise, stating they do not think there is a climate crisis and that the government pushes a catastrophic story; another adds that no single science paper proves conclusively that humans control all or most of the climate. - Europe is criticized for a “mad dash towards net zero,” described as economic suicide that deliberately impoverishes ordinary people and de-industrializes Europe, raising questions about what is being saved if it’s being paved over. - A global war on agriculture is claimed, with many farms selling up and concerns about looming food shortages. There is a suggestion that shifting people from “real food” to “pharma food” would enable control through publicly traded stocks. - The speakers call the movement “the biggest public relations scam in the history of the world” and, more broadly, a blueprint and action plan. They warn that life on Earth will be radically changed and that everything will be monitored, with environmental consequences of every human action. - A chilling point is made that once a digital ID is in place, “it's game over for humanity,” and that the general population cannot fathom the psychopathy of the vision they describe. Overall, the discussion centers on a perceived coordinated effort to centralize power globally, erode traditional democracy, redefine currency, reshape agriculture and energy systems, and surveil all human activity under a climate-justified technocracy.

A woman named Tiffany shared a video about private equity firms buying up single family homes. In 2023, these firms purchased 44% of all single family homes in America, potentially leading to them owning 60% by 2030. This trend threatens the middle class's ability to own homes, with future generations likely to rent from a few companies. Without reform, private equity firms could soon own the majority of single family homes in the country, posing a significant problem for all Americans.

Real estate prices in France are causing concern, with interest rates reaching 5%, the highest in 15 years. This means that households have lost around €100,000 in borrowing capacity over the past two and a half years. Additionally, energy efficiency is now a factor in obtaining a mortgage, with banks requiring more personal contribution for poorly insulated properties. For investors, banks may no longer consider rental income for highly energy inefficient properties, making it difficult to secure a loan. While high interest rates are expected to eventually lower prices, there is currently a divide between expensive cities experiencing price corrections and coastal areas where prices continue to rise. Overall, the real estate market is expected to face significant challenges in the near future.

I've examined the C40 consortium agenda, which includes major global cities pushing for extreme measures. They propose limiting citizens to three articles of clothing per year, drastically reducing private car ownership by 95%, and allowing only one short-haul flight every three years. This would severely impact the travel and tourism industries, particularly in Europe. The overarching aim seems to be an 85% reduction in Western living standards, deemed necessary for a sustainable planet by certain globalist groups. This agenda appears to prioritize bureaucratic ambitions and radical leftist goals, potentially sacrificing the working class and the poor in the process.

The UN's 30 by 30 agenda aims to seize 30% of all land and water on Earth, disregarding private property rights. The European Union is implementing it, and California and Joe Biden are using similar language, mentioning conserving 30% of lands and waters by 2030. The speaker claims this isn't about conservation but about taking, facilitated in the US by the sustains act, which allows the government to receive private funds for conservation programs. This act assigns value to environmental services provided by privately owned land, such as pollination, photosynthesis, and clean air/water, monetizing them through partnerships between private investors and the government, without landowner consent. The speaker asserts this is a seizing of American assets aligned with the UN's goals, without public consent or input. Representatives, according to the World Economic Forum, are now solely responsible, without needing to consult the public.

There is a push towards globalization and centralization of control by unelected officials. The goal is to collapse liberal democracy and replace it with global technocracy, controlling all resources. This involves controlling with rules, potentially eliminating currency. The plan includes commandeering land, reducing farming, changing the food supply, dictating electricity use, and replacing currency with credits, all justified by a climate crisis caused by carbon dioxide. However, some argue there is no climate crisis and no conclusive proof humans control the global climate. Europe's net-zero policies are considered economic suicide, impoverishing people and de-industrializing the continent. This is viewed as a war on agriculture, potentially leading to food shortages. The aim is to switch people to "pharma food" for complete control of the agriculture industry. This is described as a public relations scam and a blueprint to radically change all life on Earth, monitoring every human action. The digital ID is considered "game over for humanity."

As of January 1st, property owners in Mexico City must declare information about residential properties exceeding a certain value to the Finance Secretariat. This includes occupancy status, who lives there, and rental agreements. This new measure is seen as a violation of privacy and property rights, as it compels citizens to share private family matters with the authorities. It is also viewed as a targeted attack on the middle class, as it only affects properties above a specific value and excludes commercial, industrial, and agricultural lands. There are concerns that the government intends to misuse the collected data to increase property taxes, create new taxes, or even confiscate vacant properties. Similar policies were implemented in authoritarian regimes like Nazi Germany, Fascist Italy, Cuba, Venezuela, and Bolivia.

Speaker 0 argues that COPPA and related policy proposals wrongly take individual rights away from homeowners. He says the idea that a homeowner must consult with the building department and provide a six-month period for another party to make an offer is outrageous and constitutes government overreach, which he describes as 100% true. He states that this is “absolutely maniacal” and questions how this body operates when it comes to individual citizens, calling the measure overreach at its best. He identifies as a homeowner and asserts that no one will tell him or others who have worked hard to own a three- or four-family home that they must submit the ability to sell their house first to the building department and then offer it to a nonprofit, especially when a neighbor across the street may want to buy it and they must wait six months. He further adds that it is ridiculous and that everyone in the room should be terribly embarrassed for stripping veterans bills today from today's hearings. He asks why the men and women of the country deserve better treatment and asserts that the city has failed to come through for veterans, stating that the veterans bills were stripped totally off the record for today. He ends by calling the situation absolutely ridiculous and expresses shame: “Shame. Shame on all of you.”