TruthArchive.ai - Related Video Feed

A Georgia election official, who is a Democrat, discovered that none of the straight party Republican tickets in the recent runoff were being scanned. She contacted Dominion, the company responsible for the voting machines, and expressed her concern about the ballots going to adjudication instead of being counted. Dominion insisted that she just push the green button. Frustrated, she threatened to contact the local media. Dominion quickly sent someone to fix the issue. The Dominion representative acknowledged the problem and made a phone call. Ten minutes later, he returned and assured her that everything was fixed. It is important to note that the voting machines were not connected to the internet.

We need to address issues with computer voting, as seen in Antrim County, Michigan. Despite a programming error, it was caught and corrected the same day. There is no evidence of a statewide software glitch affecting other elections. Let's focus on winning elections instead of worrying about false claims.

We have a problem with the election due to the influx of mail-in ballots. Trump was initially winning in Pima County, but more ballots were suddenly poured in. The issue lies in the fact that some mail-in ballots lack signatures, indicating a broken system. Regardless of who wins, we need to ensure a fair election. Election officials were rewriting rules instead of following the legislature's authority. We don't trust the media, as they have their own agenda. People witnessed irregularities during the election and want a fair vote. We can provide a forensic audit report for further information. The deletion of a million files before the audit was debunked.

The speaker discusses the issue of bleed through on ballots and its potential impact on voting. They mention that if the bubbles on the ballot bleed through, it can cause an overvote or result in voting for a different candidate than intended. They refer to a newsletter from Maricopa County stating that they use VoteSecure paper, which is thick and has a special coating to prevent bleed through. However, the speaker points out that they have observed bleed through on actual ballots, which raises concerns. They mention the need for further analysis to determine the extent of the impact on votes. The second speaker seeks clarification and confirms that Maricopa County's newsletter stated they only use secure paper that does not allow bleed through. The first speaker affirms this and adds that paper experts have confirmed the thickness of the paper should prevent bleed through, but they have observed thin paper stock being used on Election Day.

I just voted in the White Settlement election and noticed an issue. I selected one candidate on the video screen, but the paper ballot showed a different name. Everyone should check their paper ballots carefully. I’m Lucas Clark, and I also voted at White Settlement. I waited in line for about 45 minutes. I heard from two people who experienced ballot changes, so it’s crucial to double-check your printed ballots. Thank you for your attention, and remember to verify your votes.

The transcript discusses concerns about election irregularities and voting machines. One speaker claims a voting machine subtracted votes, displaying a negative number. Another speaker states that such subtraction cannot occur accidentally and that someone consciously tried to steal votes. A third speaker says that when they press the button next to their name, another person's name appears on the display, questioning the accuracy of the vote count. Another speaker asserts that the machines are working correctly, recording votes accurately, and that the results will be accurate and reliable. One speaker expresses concern about private corporations controlling the voting system and calls for a formal debate about election irregularities, warning that the democracy and republic are at risk.

Speaker 0 mentions the possibility of printing out something. Speaker 1 asks if there is an explanation for the uncounted votes. Speaker 2 clarifies that there is no concrete explanation for why those votes were not counted by the machine in the first place. Speaker 1 confirms that they don't know why the votes didn't get scanned. Speaker 2 asks if the Dominion Tech guys have figured out the reason, but Speaker 0 says they are not allowed to comment. Speaker 1 believes it wasn't a memory card issue. Speaker 2 asks if memory cards can be ruled out, and Speaker 1 agrees. Speaker 0 suggests it may be human error, but they don't have evidence to confirm it. Speaker 2 questions if it could be a software issue, but Speaker 0 refuses to speculate. Speaker 2 acknowledges the lack of a definite answer.

Approximately 25,000 ballots were not created from the usual PDF format for the election process in Maricopa County. These ballots are tailored to specific geographical areas to account for different voting preferences. The ballots are created in advance in PDF format for mail-in and early voting convenience. However, the quality of the printed ballots in this case was significantly lower than expected, indicating a problem with the printing process.

We now know how elections are rigged, with Maricopa County mailing more ballots than voters. This shows extra ballots were printed to manipulate the election. States are avoiding scrutiny of ballots, and censorship of truth reveals we are on the right track.

Speaker 0 mentions the possibility of printing out something. Speaker 1 asks if there is an explanation for why certain votes were not counted. Speaker 2 clarifies that there is no concrete explanation for why those votes were not counted by the machine. Speaker 1 confirms that they do not know why the votes were not scanned. Speaker 2 asks if the Dominion Tech guys have figured out the reason, but Speaker 0 says they are not allowed to comment. Speaker 2 asks if it could be a memory card issue, but Speaker 1 and Speaker 0 both say they don't think so. Speaker 0 suggests it could be human error, but they don't have evidence to confirm it. Speaker 2 questions if it could be a software issue, but Speaker 0 avoids speculation. They admit they don't have a definite answer yet. Speaker 2 acknowledges this and thanks them.

The speaker questions whether purging the 2020 election database in February is a standard practice for all elections. The response is uncertain, but they promise to provide an answer. The speaker further asks why data from previous elections was still present on the databases. Again, there is no clear answer, but they assure the congressman that they will find out. The chairman mentions limited server space as a reason for making room for new election data. The speaker raises concerns about the credibility of the recorder, who had criticized Adrian Fontes, the person in charge of the 2020 election. The speaker clarifies that they had a bipartisan board overseeing the election to ensure fairness.

A Georgia representative reported that a voter in Whitfield County experienced issues with a Dominion voting machine. The machine allegedly switched votes on the printed ballot, not reflecting the voter's selections for president, congress, or other races. The voter reported the issue to election workers and had to restart the process multiple times, with the same error occurring repeatedly. The representative also expressed concerns about states like Pennsylvania, Arizona, Wisconsin, and Michigan not fixing their election laws after 2020. Additional concerns include overseas voters receiving instructions via email on how to obtain and submit absentee ballots electronically, as well as the potential for illegal aliens to vote. The representative believes there is a good reason why people are skeptical and don't trust elections. They stated that everyone they talk to feels Donald Trump would win by a landslide if the election isn't stolen, citing betting markets, business sectors, and the prevalence of Trump signs in people's yards as indicators of his support.

Congratulations to all Americans on this historic victory. However, there are concerns about voter fraud, particularly in Maricopa County, Arizona. Adrian Fontes, the Arizona Secretary of State, claims the election process is secure, but there are accusations of mishandling voter registration. Reports indicate that 90,000 registration forms submitted by a third party were mostly damaged or incomplete. Additionally, the Election Fairness Institute has identified 500,000 cloned voters in Arizona. The counting process in Arizona is criticized for taking much longer than in Florida, despite a smaller population. Many believe that late ballots will favor Republican candidates, and there is skepticism about the integrity of the election process. Voters in Arizona are encouraged to verify that their votes are counted, especially regarding the important Kary Lake Senate race. We must ensure transparency and accountability in this election.

The video discusses the 2022 general election in Maricopa County, Arizona, which saw record-breaking turnout and a close race for governor. Controversy arose when candidate Katie Hobbs refused to debate her opponent, Carrie Lake. Issues with tabulators and printers caused delays in counting the ballots, leading to an undecided governor's race one week after election day. Despite claims of voter fraud, the election was deemed secure. Concerns were raised about the accuracy of the tabulation process due to incorrectly printed ballot images. The trial between Lake and Hobbs focused on allegations of misconduct with ballot printers and handling. The video highlights the need for transparency, hand counting at the precinct level, and restoring faith in the electoral system. Viewers are urged to take action to demand change.

The speaker questions Miss Hobbs about the alleged intentional failures during the election that caused disenfranchisement of Republican voters. They mention ongoing lawsuits and express concern about her decision-making on Arizona's water future. Another person brings up the issue of signature verification in the 2022 election, where employees were allegedly clicking through signatures too quickly. Miss Hobbs states that she doesn't have a comment on it as it's not under her jurisdiction. The speaker insists that she should answer election questions since a majority of Arizonans believe the election was unfair. Miss Hobbs is reminded that she is not a reporter.

Speaker 0 asked Speaker 1 to explain what they wanted to get from the board if they had been allowed to continue. Speaker 1 mentioned that since 2019, voters have no way of knowing if their vote was counted properly because they can't read the QR code. Even if the words on the ballot match their vote, the QR code remains unreadable. Speaker 1 believes the board panicked when they were about to discuss this issue.

Maricopa County is accused of breaking seals on tabulator machines and reprogramming them without observers or lawyers present. The machines were allegedly tampered with over a three-day period before the election, causing about 60% of them to fail. The failing machines were reportedly placed in Republican areas. Despite the judge's refusal to address this issue, the accusers claim to have recorded 24-hour footage showing the tampering. They vow to continue their pursuit of secure elections and put pressure on Maricopa County.

Speaker 0 mentions the possibility of printing out something. Speaker 1 asks about the reason for the uncounted votes. Speaker 2 clarifies that there is no concrete explanation for why those votes were not counted by the machine. Speaker 1 confirms that they don't know why the votes didn't get scanned. Speaker 2 asks if the Dominion Tech guys have figured out the reason, but Speaker 0 says they are not allowed to comment. Speaker 2 points out that it hasn't been confirmed if it was a memory card issue. Speaker 1 agrees and suggests it could be human error. Speaker 0 says the ballots didn't transfer over correctly, but they don't have a definite answer yet. Speaker 2 asks if it could be a software issue, but Speaker 0 refuses to speculate. They conclude that they don't have a pinpointed answer at the moment.

The director is awaiting clarification on a reported human error from the state board of elections. Concerns about a flash drive with votes are raised, but the director is unsure if it was read multiple times. Despite past issues, the director defends their oversight of elections. The state board is investigating discrepancies in election results, with canvassing ongoing for provisional and mail-in ballots.

Mr. Bennett questions if it's standard practice to delete files off a server after an election. Mr. Gates says they maintained files but deleted the ones that were archived. It is revealed that Maricopa County deleted files off the server after the election, which the auditors didn't have access to initially. The auditors didn't subpoena those files, and Maricopa County claims they responded to the subpoena. Mr. Bennett finds it laughable that the county would delete files in response to a subpoena, as the subpoena requested all records related to the election. The county interpreted the subpoena differently.

The election supervisor wants to vote for Jason Shaw. During adjudication, the supervisor states they want to vote for Biden, overriding the original marks on a ballot. The supervisor decides someone "don't deserve no votes" and chooses not to count votes on that ballot. The supervisor then declares another ballot should be blank. The supervisor admits to scanning the same batches of ballots repeatedly.

Hi, everyone. This is Harmit Dhillon in Scottsdale, Arizona, with the election integrity team. We have numerous lawyers and thousands of observers reporting on voting conditions, including line lengths and issues with paper and ink. I'm pleased to share that we are quickly resolving any problems and assisting voters. So far, there are no significant long lines that haven't been addressed. We are effectively deploying voters from crowded locations to nearby polling places. The communication and get-out-the-vote efforts have improved significantly from previous elections, leading to great voter turnout. Every vote matters, especially in close races here in Arizona, and we aim to win decisively. Thank you for your efforts, and please make sure to vote. Looking forward to a successful election day!

The Arizona audit report does not confirm that Joe Biden won the election. The purpose of the audit was to identify problems with the election system and provide recommendations for legislative reform. One major issue found was that 23,344 people received ballots at their former addresses and were able to fill them out and mail them in. This finding alone exceeds the margin of victory. However, the media coverage of the audit results has been misleading, with some outlets claiming that Biden won by even more votes. The speaker dismisses this as "fake news" and emphasizes that the goal of the audit was to uncover the truth.

The video provides an overview of the controversies surrounding the 2022 general election in Arizona, specifically in Maricopa County. It mentions the high voter turnout and the closely contested race for governor. Concerns are raised about candidates avoiding debates and the security and accuracy of the election process. Issues with tabulators, printers, and signature verification are highlighted, along with unauthorized testing of machines and the discovery of fit-to-page ballots. The trial of an election lawsuit is discussed, alleging misconduct with ballot printers and handling. The video raises questions about transparency and the integrity of the election system. The speakers emphasize the need for hand counting ballots at the precinct level to ensure accuracy and restore trust in the election system, urging viewers to take action and demand changes to prevent future election fraud.

The speaker highlights that the number of misfeeds in the voting system is much higher than the federal standard of one out of 500. They mention that the insertion errors were a significant issue throughout Election Day, contrary to reports claiming it was a minor problem. The system log files reveal that there were consistently over 7,000 ballot insertion failures every 30 minutes from 7 a.m. to 8 p.m., with some intervals exceeding 8,000 errors. The problem persisted throughout the day despite technicians attempting to fix it.